The Poor Are Getting … Richer

It really is getting better -- even for the bottom billion.

BY CHARLES KENNY | FEBRUARY 7, 2011

For most of the last 200 years, the story of global incomes has been one of the rich getting richer and the poor staying poor -- or "divergence, big time," as Harvard Kennedy School professor Lant Pritchett put it in a 1997 article. Pritchett argued that in 1870, the world's richest country was probably about nine times as rich as the poorest country. By 1990, that gap had increased to a 45-fold difference. And populations grew fast in many of the stagnant economies at the wrong end of this divergence. By 1981, according to the World Bank, 1.9 billion people, or half of the population of the developing world, lived on $1.25 a day or less.

It's easy to assume, faced with images of continuing destitution in rural Africa and South Asia, that things have just kept getting worse. But they haven't. In fact, over the last two decades the pattern has reversed. The world has got a lot less poor -- and the nature of the poverty that remains has changed in important ways.

Start with the numbers: In the 1980s, the average GDP per capita growth rate in developing countries was 1.4 percent, according to data from the World Bank. By the first decade of the 21st century, however, the average had shot up to 4.4 percent -- considerably higher than growth rates in rich countries. As a result of this economic explosion, the number of countries classified as low income -- that is, with a GDP per capita of less than about $1,000 -- has fallen from 60 in 2003 to 39 today.

It's not just countries that are getting richer -- individual people are, too. In 2005, the number of people worldwide living in absolute poverty, or on $1.25 or less a day, was around 1.3 billion, according to estimates from Laurence Chandy and Geoffrey Gertz of the Brookings Institution. The same researchers suggest it was below 900 million last year. From one-half of the developing world in 1981, they estimate the proportion of people in absolute poverty today at less than one-sixth.

This isn't just a story of Chinese tigers and Indian elephants -- even Africa is getting in on the action. To be sure, the continent was late to the party, but the last 10 years have seen impressive growth in countries both oil-rich and oil-poor, landlocked and coastal. According to Xavier Sala-i-Martin and Maxim Pinkovskiy of Columbia University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, respectively, Africa is on track to halve the number of people living in absolute poverty between 1990 and 2017. Already, poverty rates are 30 percent lower than they were in 1995.

Of course, all these numbers need to be taken with a cellar's worth of salt. Measuring incomes within countries is hard, and meaningfully comparing them across borders -- when the same goods have different prices from country to country, and people buy different things -- is even harder. Measuring across time adds additional uncertainty. Trying to come up with regional and global estimates, especially for the last few years, requires filling in big gaps using rafts of arguable assumptions. One indication of the lacking exactitude of cross-country income data is that with a few exceptions we don't really know whether African countries south of the Sahara are richer or poorer than each other.

Caveats aside, the trends are strong enough that the broad picture of falling global poverty and rising incomes is widely accepted -- and that makes for some dramatic changes in the nature of the world's poverty problem.

Issouf Sonogo/AFP

 SUBJECTS:
 

Charles Kenny is a senior fellow at the Center for Global Development, a Schwartz fellow at the New America Foundation, and author, most recently, of Getting Better: Why Global Development Is Succeeding and How We Can Improve the World Even More. "The Optimist", his column for ForeignPolicy.com, runs weekly.

XENOPHON

10:49 PM ET

February 7, 2011

Wait Just a Minute

Well, well. The optimist is back with more happy talk. Charles Kenny says that there are fewer people in extreme poverty now than several decades ago. This could be true, but let's dig a bit. Here is his basic comparison:

"By 1981, according to the World Bank, 1.9 billion people, or half of the population of the developing world, lived on $1.25 a day or less."

"In 2005, the number of people worldwide living in absolute poverty, or on $1.25 or less a day, was around 1.3 billion...The same researchers suggest it was below 900 million last year."

But what about the fact that $1.25 was worth much less in 2005 than it was in 1981? (And even less in 2011.) In fact, nowhere does Kenny even mention the word inflation. Are these constant dollars? Kenny gives me no reason to think so. What cost $1.25 in 1981 cost $2.67 in 2005 and $2.91 in 2009. So, if you want to make a legitimate comparison between 1981 and 2005, the question should be how many people were existing on $2.67 in 2005 (and how many on $2.91 in 2009)?

The same point applies to his claims about per capita GDP improvement. $1,000 in 2003 was the equivalent of $1,163.58 in 2009.

Moreover, food and fuel, which take up a higher proportion of a poor person's budget, have gone up even faster. This spike in food and fuel prices has been the proximate cause of the extreme instability in Tunesia, Egypt and other countries. The monetary inflation of the US Federal Reserve and other central banks is contributing materially to this spike.

Also, like the US, any improvement probably has relied heavily on women entering the work force and may explain a good deal of the economic "progress". This tends to have hidden social costs, especially where child care is basically nonexistent. US family incomes have been essentially stagnant since 1980 even with women entering the workforce and seem now to be trending downward.

Of course, the labor arbitrage so beloved of our corporations has undoubtedly raised wages in some locations, but there is no Ricardian magic at work. Wages in the West are falling as the jobs are transferred elsewhere.

So, it's not exactly clear that things are getting systematically better except, arguably, in China, a few other East Asian manufacturers and perhaps in some hydrocarbon producers.

Just what is kenny trying to pull here? I guess happy talk is just his job.

 

JOHN MILTON XIV

11:31 PM ET

February 7, 2011

"IMF Raises Spectre of Civil

"IMF Raises Spectre of Civil Wars as Global Inequalities Worsen"

http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/209-bwi-wto/49768-imf-raises-spectre-of-civil-wars-as-global-inequalities-worsen.html

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) identifies global inequality as a major cause of the economic crisis and urges nations to address it. A recent paper released by the IMF states that workers have steadily lost their "bargaining power" relative to owners of capital. To reverse this trend, governments should institute radical changes to their tax codes and offer debt relief to workers facing an escalating crunch from low wage growth and increasing food and energy prices.

By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard

The Telegraph
February 1, 2011

The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has warned that "dangerous" imbalances have emerged that threaten to derail global recovery and stoke tensions that may ultimately set off civil wars in deeply unequal countries.

Dominique Strauss-Kahn, the IMF's chief, said the economic rebound across the world is built on unstable foundations, with many rich nations still strapped in job slumps while the rising powers of China, India and Brazil already facing the threat of overheating. "It is not the recovery we wanted. It is a recovery beset by tensions and strain, which could even sow the seeds of the next crisis," he said.

"Global unemployment remains at record highs, with widening income inequality adding to social strains," he said, citing turmoil in North Africa as a prelude to what may happen as 400m youths join the workforce over the next decade. "We could see rising social and political instability within nations - even war," he said.

The IMF has published a paper entitled Inequality, Leverage and Crisis arguing that the extreme gap between rich and poor - with echoes of the US in the late 1920s - was an underlying cause of the Great Recession from 2008-2009.

The paper, by the Fund's modelling unit, warned of "disastrous consequences" for the world economy unless workers regain their "bargaining power" against rentiers. It suggests radical changes to the tax system and debt relief for workers.

Mr Strauss-Kahn said the toxic global imbalances that caused the financial crisis are re-emerging, naming China and Germany as the two arch-sinners that rely on export surpluses to power growth at the expense of the US and other deficit countries.

"The most important question is to deal with the recurrent problem of some countries' large external surpluses," he said, warning that failure to curb excesses will lead to global clashes and rising protectionism in trade and finance.

In a veiled warning to China and other countries holding down their currencies for commercial advantage, the IMF chief said "exchange-rate adjustment should not be resisted". Nor should capital controls be imposed to stop the inflow of funds.

The comments appear to align the IMF behind Washington in the simmering dispute over the declining dollar. China and Brazil have accused the US of covert currency warfare through quantitative easing, but the claim is slippery since the US has a huge structural trade deficit.

Mr. Strauss-Kahn also hinted that parts of Asia are exceeding the safe speed limit for growth and needed to "tighten" further before inflation gets out of control. "There are risks of overheating, and even a hard landing," he said."

http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/209-bwi-wto/49768-imf-raises-spectre-of-civil-wars-as-global-inequalities-worsen.html

The IMF report that is referred to in the above article can be at the below address.

http://www.globalpolicy.org/images/pdfs/Inequality_Leverage_Crises.pdf

 

JOHN MILTON XIV

11:35 PM ET

February 7, 2011

The IMF report that is

The IMF report that is referred to in the above article can be found at the below address.

http://www.globalpolicy.org/images/pdfs/Inequality_Leverage_Crises.pdf

 

JOHN MILTON XIV

10:22 PM ET

February 8, 2011

Re. the account given of the

Re. the account given of the interview which Dominique Strauss-Kahn gave in Singapore earlier this month, the story in the Telegraph stressed his remarks concerning international trade.

(I can't seem to find a full transcript of the interview anywhere.)

The following account

http://www.euronews.net/newswires/717549-global-imbalances-returning-could-fuel-unrest-imf-chief/

contains some very important and urgent warnings concerning the fate of labor around the world.

"Strauss-Kahn noted two “dangerous” imbalances that he said could sow the seeds of the next crisis.

The first was the unbalanced recovery across countries, as emerging nations grow much faster than developed economies and possibly overheat. The second was the social strains within countries with high unemployment and widening income gaps.

Over the next decade, 400 million young people would join the global labour force, posing a daunting challenge for governments, Strauss-Kahn added.

“We face the prospect of a ‘lost generation’ of young people, destined to suffer their whole lives from worse unemployment and social conditions. Creating jobs must be a top priority not only in the advanced economies, but also in many poorer countries.”

Unemployment stands at 9.4 percent in the United States while European countries are struggling to create jobs."

The reason I'm making such a song and dance about these remarks is obviously due to the remarkable 180 degree change in tone coming from the IMF in the last few years.

As always the best place to turn for data and analysis is straight from the horse's mouth.

http://www.ilo.org/pls/apex/f?p=109:1:0

 

JOHN MILTON XIV

10:30 PM ET

February 8, 2011

D'OHHH!!!! Actually above

D'OHHH!!!!

Actually above remarks *were* contained in Telegraph account. That'll teach me to "speed-read". Wish these boards had an edit or delete function,

Oh well, I'll just have to put up with the severe embarrassment of being absent-minded and tautologous.

 

PFOLLERS

8:50 AM ET

March 7, 2011

Well, The reason why the poor

Well, The reason why the poor in China are getting wealthier is because they were able to get jobs producing things. The same jobs which used to belong to the middle class of the developed nations, like the US. As the result, the average Chinese are wealthier, the average wealthy in the US are a lot wealthier, and the average middle class American is a lot poorer.

The real question is: Is it a good thing for the average American to lose his $40k/yr job so that 4 or more poor in India or China, or where ever can see dramatic increase in their living standards and life style. T he answer really depends on who you are asking. hidrolipo

 

JOHN MILTON XIV

1:10 AM ET

February 8, 2011

Mr Charles Kenny, The

Mr Charles Kenny,

The problem with eg. Jeffrey Sachs, Tom Freidman et al. and your good self is that for "Davos men" such as yourselves "there is no such thing as society" in Mrs Thatcher's pithy formulation - neither at a national level nor a fortiori at a global level.

I realize that to make this argument properly would require producing here a veritable Alexandrian library of supporting data and analysis.

I'll content myself instead with noting the vast world of difference between "trickle down" theories of redistribution - otherwise known as "being pissed on from a great height"!! - and a grassroots or "autochthonic" approach to socio-economic growth and (geo)political empowerment and agency.

Immanuel Wallerstein describes this as the conflict between the spirit of Davos and the spirit of Porte Alegre.

The World Economic Forum
is an independent international organization committed to improving the state of the world by engaging business, political, academic and other leaders of society to shape global, regional and industry agendas.

http://www.weforum.org/

"There are several levels of membership: the basic level, which will get you one invitation to Davos, costs 50,000 Swiss francs, or about $52,000. The ticket itself is another 18,000 Swiss francs ($19,000), plus tax, bringing the total cost of membership and entrance fee to $71,000.

But that fee just gets you in the door with the masses at Davos, with entry to all the general sessions. If you want to be invited behind the velvet rope to participate in private sessions among your industry’s peers, you need to step up to the “Industry Associate” level. That costs $137,000, plus the price of the ticket, bringing the total to about $156,000.

Of course, most chief executives don’t like going anywhere alone, so they might ask a colleague along. Well, the World Economic Forum doesn’t just let you buy an additional ticket for $19,000. Instead, you need to upgrade your annual membership to the “Industry Partner” level. That will set you back about $263,000, plus the cost of two tickets, bringing the total to $301,000.

And if you want to take an entourage, say, five people? Now you’re talking about the “Strategic Partner” level. The price tag: $527,000. (That’s just the annual membership entitling you to as many as five invitations. Each invitation is still $19,000 each, so if five people come, that’s $95,000, making the total $622,000.)"
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2011/01/24/a-hefty-price-for-entry-to-davos/

World Social Forum Charter of Principles

1. The World Social Forum is an open meeting place for reflective thinking, democratic debate of ideas, formulation of proposals, free exchange of experiences and interlinking for effective action, by groups and movements of civil society that are opposed to neoliberalism and to domination of the world by capital and any form of imperialism, and are committed to building a planetary society directed towards fruitful relationships among Humankind and between it and the Earth.

http://www.forumsocialmundial.org.br/main.php?id_menu=4&cd_language=2

See the difference??

I hope and pray to God that you do for while it would be nice to think the WEC and WSF could simply meet together in their common humanity and happily "synthesize" their findings and peoples, such a pipe-dream would completely ignore the conflictual reality embedded in the blood-soaked history of the 500 year-old Capitalist world system.

I wish it were not so but "the history of civilization is the history of class-conflict".

Meine Kamerad, meine Feind, we are friends between which there is a barbed-wire fence.

 

XTIANGODLOKI

12:38 PM ET

February 8, 2011

Third world poor are taking jobs from American middle class

The reason why the poor in China are getting wealthier is because they were able to get jobs producing things. The same jobs which used to belong to the middle class of the developed nations, like the US. As the result, the average Chinese are wealthier, the average wealthy in the US are a lot wealthier, and the average middle class American is a lot poorer.

The real question is: Is it a good thing for the average American to lose his $40k/yr job so that 4 or more poor in India or China, or where ever can see dramatic increase in their living standards and life style. T he answer really depends on who you are asking.

 

JOHN MILTON XIV

4:25 PM ET

February 8, 2011

One notable figure on the

One notable figure on the American side who thinks that the processes which you describe are assuredly a *bad thing* is Paul Craig Roberts.

He served as an Assistant Sectary of the Treasury during the Reagan Administration, earned fame as one of the co-founders of "Reaganomics" and has since become a harsh critic of neo-liberal globalization.

A collection of his columns and essays can be found here.

http://vdare.com/roberts/all_columns.htm

Pretty much all of his insightful essays are worth reading.

At least to my mind, amongst the highlights are:

http://vdare.com/roberts/100831_death_by_globalism.htm

http://vdare.com/roberts/081029_dollar.htm

http://vdare.com/roberts/091005_marx_and_lenin.htm

http://vdare.com/roberts/091015_economy.htm

http://vdare.com/roberts/101027_job_loss.htm

http://vdare.com/roberts/110109_unemployment.htm

http://vdare.com/roberts/090603_illiteracy.htm

http://vdare.com/roberts/090818_oligarchs.htm

 

YOGI-ONE

11:52 AM ET

February 20, 2011

How about toppling a few of the financial dictators?

There's specific reasons for the 2008-2009 world economy crash. There's specific reasons why the poor aren't seeing real gains, and specific reasons why the middle class is losing the war brought against us by the elite financial class.

And there are specific perpetrators of immoral actions and outright white collar crimes on a massive scale. And our leaders, like Obama, just worship and protect these crooks.

Don't tell me 'nobody could have seen it coming'. BS. The whole thing was engineered.
Want to make inroads into ending inequality and alleviating povertyy? Why not start by getting rid of the people who are perpetrating it on the rest of us?
Like some of your beloved Davos buddies, for a few.

Maybe there is one good effect of the separation of classes - I can keep my kids away from people like Bernanke, Greenspan, Rubin, Summers, Cassano, and the rest of the greasy criminals.

Educate thyselves:

Why isn't Wall Street in Jail?
http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/why-isnt-wall-street-in-jail-20110216?page=1

Fed dictator Bernanke needs to be toppled
Commentary: Forget Mubarak, it’s Fed reign of terror that must end
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/fed-dictator-bernanke-needs-to-be-toppled-2011-02-15

Don't know what planet you live on Charles, but there's LOT of angry people out here who know exactly who is giving them the shaft. And you are starting to see them hit the streets of the world. This is the beginning of something, not just a bumpy space in some Disney-esque Small World After All that you seem to live in.

Expect sopme serious boat-rocking, because it's coming.

 

ABCDE

4:11 AM ET

February 22, 2011

Even if less poor

it doesn't excuse the rampant corruption and exploitation across the globe.

Just reading the FP article on the US supported Equatorial Guinea where the "average" GDP per capita is above $36,000 per person, but it sounds like the "media" GDP per capita is about $3.50 (slight exaggeration perhaps).

In that country alone, and enlightened leadership could end poverty for the 80% of it's country that are suffering.