Revolution in the Arab World
Dispatches Middle East Channel Latest Scenes from the Uprisings

Why the Egypt Revolution Is Good for Israel

It's not pretty, and there certainly are risks, but the fall of Mubarak could mean a better, lasting peace in the Middle East.

BY KAI BIRD | FEBRUARY 10, 2011

I long to be back in Cairo. I have fond memories of the two years I spent there from 1965 to 1967. I remember sipping sweet black tea in the Old City's Khan al-Khalili souk, hanging out on weekends at Groppi's Tea Room, and riding the train to the southern suburb of Maadi, where I attended an international high school. I have vivid memories of Tahrir Square's chaotic sidewalks. There were crowds of people everywhere, a moving mosaic of gentle, jostling chaos. It was a noisy city, home to both considerable wealth and desperate poverty, and over the three decades of President Hosni Mubarak's rule the inequality gap has grown even wider.

I wish I could be there today, in solidarity with the thousands of young and old Egyptians, to celebrate the demise of his dreadful regime. But what we are witnessing is more than the end of a government -- it is nothing less than the birth of a new liberal order in Egypt. And that's not only good news for the beleaguered citizens of Egypt, but also the United States and Israel.

The upheaval in Egypt marks the demise of two generations of stagnation in the Arab world that began with the Naksa ("Setback") -- the Arabic word to describe the defeat in the 1967 war. That loss ushered in a cynical era of autocracy, corruption, repression, and fatalism. It marked the defeat of the secular Arab project and profoundly humiliated Egypt's Gamal Abdel Nasser, the last Arab leader who could plausibly claim to reflect the broad popular will. Nasser's defeat was also the defeat of any notion that the Arab world had a progressive, modernist future.

In the wake of the 1967 war, Mohamed Heikal, Egypt's prominent pundit, punned that power had shifted in the Arab world from thawra ("revolution") to tharwa ("wealth"). Not incidentally, the defeat of secular Arab nationalism created an intellectual vacuum that was filled by religiosity. As Syria's Yale-trained philosopher Sadik al-Azm said, "At the same time, the political regimes responsible for the military defeat began utilizing religion in general and Islam in particular in a campaign designed to protect them from the aftermath of the defeat."

Nasser's successor, Anwar Sadat, adopted the language of Islam, partly in an attempt to co-opt the Muslim Brotherhood and give himself a semblance of legitimacy. He cracked down on the secular left and shifted the regime to the right with his Open Door policies, welcoming American investment and influence. In the wake of the October 1973 war, Sadat was briefly seen as a genuinely popular national leader. In November 1977, he astonished everyone by flying to Jerusalem. Most Egyptians were tired of war and so welcomed the subsequent Camp David Accords and the Egypt-Israel peace treaty. But at the same time, Israel was still regarded with suspicion and even hostility. It was always a cold peace.

ABBAS MOMANI/AFP/Getty Images

 

Kai Bird is a Pulitzer Prize winning historian, and the author most recently of Crossing Mandelbaum Gate: Coming of Age Between the Arabs and Israelis, 1956-1978, which has just been named a Finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award in autobiography.         

TECHGUY222

2:57 PM ET

February 10, 2011

This is really, really

This is really, really stretching it, implying:
A) That Israel will ever acknowledge the legitimacy of Hamas.
B) That the Egyptians won't go softer on Gaza, now with the pro-Western dictator gone, and that Israel won't retaliate in response.
C) That Hamas will forge an agreement with Fatah, which lacks legitimacy among both Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank, especially after the Palestinian Papers.
I've seen some optimistic analyses of the Egyptian revolution, but this one takes the cake.

 

PECHORIN

6:21 PM ET

February 10, 2011

Why?

The real question is why FP published this guy at all. By his own admission he hasn't been in Egypt for over 40 years, and from what I can find about his biography he doesn't have any other qualifications to be writing about the Middle East. He's one of those journalist-turned historians who write popular nonfiction books on topics they know nothing about. Benny Morris wrote a damning review of his most recent book for its factual inaccuracies and frequent elisions. His criticisms weren't a matter of politics, but they were pointing to the shoddy work produced by journalists like Kai Bird who have no training in history and no familiarity with the standards and methods of academic historians.

I understand that Egypt's a hot topic right now, and FP presumably wants the page views from articles about it. But there are dozens, even hundreds, of qualified scholars who are infinitely more qualified to write on the subject than Mr. Bird and would love the exposure. So why can't we have content written by people who have some credibility? Why does FP give us this guy, who has hardly any more insight into Egypt than an undergrad who did a semester abroad there? I'd like to see less of this in the future.

 

KHADIJA

8:22 AM ET

February 11, 2011

I agree

I agree with you about what you said but I am really surprised to read such an article on FP ,too much triviality, because if the revolution gain succecc Israel will be the biggest looser that's why the USA and it's Obama government are trying to kill this success by preparing it's new good boy the coming dictator Omar Suliman ( by the way it's the first time in egypt history to have a vice president , he is appionted after an American order i guess ).
I think that Mr Bird have no idea about what is really going on in the Middle East ."

 

YARBELS

3:03 PM ET

February 10, 2011

Obama's new dictator

We appointed our CIA trained torturer to be the next dictator of Eygpt...we made him the "vice president" now he is the next American appointed dictator....you think this is a good thing? I mean yes Obama did get what he wanted a puppet paid off with our tax dollars to do Obama's torturing for him...and your OK with all of this? The CIA has stated that Vice President Omar Suleiman will take over. He is the former Deputy head of MILITARY INTELLIGEN­CE, dubbed by the Daily Telegraph him as "one of the most POWERFUL spy chiefs."
Suleiman has been implicated as directly involved in the controvers­ial CIA "rendition­" program.So OF COURSE the CIA director would want him to be the next President of Egypt.
Meet the new boss, WORSE than the old boss. Typical Obama he still needed someone to do his torturing for him. As always you can contact me at work http://www.usa-businessreview.com and yes keep those jokes coming! Like the one about the sicko president who held his first reelection campaign in Tucson just days after the death of a nine year old girl! It is amazing how low he will stoop and the media proudly displaying their love for him pretends his attempt to profit from a young girls death is a good thing!

 

COLINDALE

3:16 AM ET

February 11, 2011

As the slender Omar Suleiman teeters up in his stiletto heels

As the aged Mubarak falls out of Netanyahu’s comfortable bed, with its $1.3 billion American blanket, the slender Omar Suleiman teeters up in his stiletto heels, anxious to take up the offer to sleep with the Israeli prime minister who desperately needs someone to cuddle during the dark nights of revolution now sweeping through his region of the Middle East.

Binyamin Netanyahu has never been used to sleeping alone and during these long nights is comforted by the thought that a United States president is always at the end of the line to promise eternal love and tanks from the American people. Ordinary men and women who are willing to sacrifice jobs and medicare to ensure that both he and the Likud party are always able to sleep secure in the knowledge that the United States and Israel are blood brothers with identical wants, needs, resources, peoples, friends and enemies.

Or is that just a dream? The Prime Minister is never entirely sure and that’s why he needs reassurance in the small hours when he wakes hot and sweating. But the hand of Omar looks to be the one that will now hold him close to kiss his brow.
Isn’t love just wonderful?
________________________________________

 

YARBELS

1:30 PM ET

February 11, 2011

Time for Obama to step down

Obama close personal friend is gone? Lucky he placed the CIA trained torturer as vice president just in time! I mean Obama can't get his hands dirty doing his own torturing! He is a busy man he has a campaign to run!
Obama should take his own advise, step down and take Biden/Reid and Palosi with him. As always you can contact me at work http://www.usa-businessreview.com and yes keep those jokes coming.. Like the one that is Soros! "The Jewish Funds group has received financial support from Soros's Open Society Foundations." What a joke so much for freedom of speech! You did notice they never denied Soro's sent fellow Jews to their death! They just wanted Beck to stop telling people about it! Wow maybe I should watch this Beck guy some time!Glad to hear someone is educating Americans on the Holocaust! I am sick of people saying it never happened! How can these people call themselves Jews? Little Georgie Soros paid people off so they would stop telling people that he killed his fellow Jews during the Holocaust....amazing that he can show his face in public without people spitting in it. I often wonder why the M0SSAD isn't keeping an eye on Soros like they do to other Jewish Nazi treasonists. He may have kept himself out of the Nazi ovens but hell will be much hotter.

 

RON01

5:07 PM ET

February 11, 2011

Isreal want to push secular,

Isreal want to push secular, democratic governance among its neighbour. How would that work on Saudi Arabia? Iran has a democratic system, but it turn out working against Israel's interest.

 

OPEMILY

11:40 PM ET

February 11, 2011

I wouldn't call iran's system

I wouldn't call iran's system democratic...

 

OPEMILY

11:40 PM ET

February 11, 2011

I wouldn't call iran's system

I wouldn't call iran's system democratic...

 

USAMA2

12:49 AM ET

February 12, 2011

Democracy and Empire go Together

Do folks here even know what democracy is?

Really, you pretend all kinds of platitudes and superiority with 'democracy' but ignore the reality that America, the most powerful democracy in the world, has perpetrated some horrible, amoral, destructive policies, which include working with and supporting Mubarak for decades.
Heck, America has worked with the Syrian regime too, including sending "detainee" for rendition and "interviews" in Syrian prisons.

The Greek empire was a democracy and was the Roman empire for various periods. For Greek men and Roman men respectively. The French had a democracy while maintaining their colonial empire, as did the British.
And America is a democracy while sustaining a global empire.

Democracy and empire are synonmous in political reality. One group of people's 'freedom' gives them supposed license to oppress and subjugate many more people for their benefit and interest.

Egypt's fate is unknown, but it is STILL part of the American empire as its generals that were trained in America and catered to American interests now directly rule Egypt as a military junta. Talk of "democracy" for Egypt is an offense to reality.

America has nullified elections of Muslim countries and sanctioned their nullification, it has overthrown elected Muslim governments and sanctioned their overthrow, and it has colluded to uphold tyranny over the liberation of people.

Egypt is not free. Not yet.

 

MARKUS

6:10 AM ET

February 19, 2011

Why the Egypt Revolution Is Good for Israel

Totally disagree with you. Relations between Egypt and Israel under Mubarak were not the best but they were stable. Israel was at peace for the border with Egypt.
Now the situation is very tense for Israel because Opposition in Egypt is set against Israel.
My blog.