How Russia and China See the Egyptian Revolution

In Moscow and Beijing, the powers that be are understandably unsettled by events in Cairo -- and Washington can't afford to ignore their reaction.

BY FIONA HILL | FEBRUARY 15, 2011

One of the principal bases of U.S. foreign policy under President Barack Obama has been to create as constructive relations as possible with Russia, China, and other great powers. The administration had some degree of success in 2010: notably the Russia "reset" policy and managing inevitable trade and other tensions with rising China. But 2011 looks set to be more challenging as events continue to unfold in Egypt after the mass demonstrations that ousted President Hosni Mubarak and as the United States, Russia, and China all prepare for elections in 2012.

In moving forward on a strategy for Egypt, Washington will have to factor in how to deal with reactions and perceptions in Moscow and Beijing, and what implications the still evolving outcomes in Cairo will have for the complex algorithm of bilateral relations between the United States, Russia, and China. The demonstrations in Tahrir Square will have global ripple effects, and Washington must be very careful to avoid falling into the usual stovepipes in thinking through and crafting a comprehensive response. This is not simply an issue for the Arabists or Middle East hands in the administration.

Although China and Russia are clearly very different from Egypt, the implosion of Mubarak's regime is a stark warning of the difficulties all authoritarian governments face in dealing with the modern world. Mubarak's fate was shaped by a faltering economy, high unemployment, glaring income disparities, mounting popular frustration, and the unpredictable dynamics created by new forms of public and social media. Although China may be rising economically and politically, the one-party regime perceives serious challenges to its legitimacy, and crisis management is complicated by its collective leadership. Russia is particularly vulnerable given the tight correlation between its economic growth and global oil prices and the fact that, as in Egypt, one man -- Vladimir Putin -- dominates the political scene and his personal popularity underpins the government's legitimacy. China and Russia will now be very cautious about opening their domestic political space for more popular participation in their respective leadership transition and presidential elections in 2012 in case this casts increased media spotlight on their shortcomings and brings opposition groups and their supporters onto the streets. They will also watch Washington's policies in Egypt very closely for any hint that the United States will move to support their domestic opposition groups now that the political winds in Washington seem to have changed in favor of democracy promotion again. For Beijing and Moscow, internal stability will be even more the imperative.

China and Russia should also be concerned about where unrest might emerge next. Most of the focus in recent days has been on the Middle East, on the consequences for Israel and Iran, and on the potential contagion or inspiration for political change across the Arab world, given that the uprising in Egypt was preceded and spurred by the January overthrow of President Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali in Tunisia. The list of Arab regimes next in line for a popular backlash variously includes Algeria, Jordan, Syria, Yemen, and also potentially the Palestinian Authority. But none of these states is of monumental strategic significance to Moscow or Beijing. However, there are states outside the Arab world and the Middle East where family dynasties or autocratic regimes have entrenched themselves, emasculated opposition parties and democratic institutions, and denied their populations any meaningful say in leadership succession. Many of these are in Russia and China's neighborhood, including Azerbaijan; Belarus; the Central Asian states of Kazakhstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan; and North Korea. They all face the risk of their own Mubarak moment. And Russia, in particular, is right to be worried. A host of states on its periphery had their political convulsions in the so-called color revolutions of 2003 to 2005.

MAXIM MARMUR/AFP/Getty Images

 

Fiona Hill is director of the Brookings Institution's Center on the United States and Europe and senior fellow in its foreign-policy program. From 2006 to 2009, she was on leave from Brookings as the national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia at the U.S. National Intelligence Council.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

BOXUAN

4:39 PM ET

February 15, 2011

China banned web searches of "Egypt," ???

I just did a quick search in BAIDU, the biggest search engine in China, and this is what I found:
http://www.baidu.com/s?bs=%B0%A3%BC%B0&f=8&wd=%B0%A3%BC%B0
Everyone interested could try to translate it in English by google or other tools.

Also I routinely view SINA, the mostly used portal site in China, and I can show you this page:
http://news.sina.com.cn/z/Mubarak2011/index.shtml.
Yes, a special column on Egypt's newly events.

Here's the page from SOHU, the other important portal site: http://news.sohu.com/s2011/8489/s279138583/
Translate it, and you'll see how awefully wrong your former assertion is.

So a piece of advice to Ms. Fiona Hill, next time you should try to make your point without lying to people, because lazy readers could easily be cheated and misled, then manipulated.

 

LYTOOMUCH

10:25 AM ET

February 17, 2011

Lazy Commentator like you

Yes, You. Next time you should try to live in China. Or better still, be a Chinese, like me.

It would be laughable to block a word "egypt" ???so instead of doing that, they keep the negative news of the protests. Maybe you care to read the news, half of them about how many people were killed (hahaha don't protest you idiots), half about the crimes the "mobs" have commited (You see we actually saved you by slaughtering you in 1989). But these, of course, had been the case before Mubarak was out.

I think what Ms. Hill meant is what happened on the micro-blogs sponsored by sina, sohu. They actually banned the words ?? in micro-blog search engine. So here is my advice: run the search a little more carefully.

 

VIVID_HAZE

5:56 PM ET

February 15, 2011

@BUDAHH

Do you live in China? I believe the search filters only apply to mainland china, where you will be directed to baidu.cn not baidu.com. The filtering is done at the ISP, so ISPs based outside of China will not be affected.

Anyway, I suggest you learn what you're talking about before you start aggressively spouting off.

This was a great article, very interesting.

 

ANDOR_1

7:49 PM ET

February 15, 2011

China and Russia

http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/world/2011-02/13/content_11998939.htm

Here is an article regarding Egypt in the China Daily.
I think the author is trying to prove her original premise by grouping together totally different counties, regions and economies.
She keeps piling Moldova, Ukraine and Georgia in one category with the the huge countries such as China and Russia, trying to tell her readers that somehow they all fall into one category. Wrong.
Economies of Russia and China are far more diversified than she is trying to make you believe.
The political regimes are much closer to what people of these countries want to see than the few dissidents would like the West to believe.
Don't hurry to see anything similar to the Egyptian uprising in Moscow or Beijing soon )))

 

XENOPHON

10:53 PM ET

February 15, 2011

NIO?

Wow--for someone who was the National Intelligence Officer for Russia, I don't find her analysis terribly impressive. The article is supposed to be about how Russia and China view the turmoil in Egypt, etc, but she doesn't actually document any reaction. It's all just speculation on what they SHOULD be concerned about or what they MIGHT be concerned about.

 

PKOULIEV

1:15 AM ET

February 16, 2011

Battle of the Giants

Fiona Hill's article covers all aspects and tendencies taking place in politics of superpowers. As Ms. Hill indicated in her article individual factor getting more voice and influencing many others through modern technology becomes part of today's society building mechanisms. Many countries with authoritarian regimes realize that it is impossible to restrict people's thinking due to being part of civilization progress. In a competitive world of economic racing, one country cannot just rely on natural sources, intellectual assets and contributions play very important role and it comes with unlimited access to media sharing technologies. Thank you for such an informative article.

 

AR

4:05 AM ET

February 16, 2011

Andor and Xenophon: You too

Andor and Xenophon:

You too understood that this paper is fluff and nothing more.

 

ANDOR_1

3:15 PM ET

February 16, 2011

)))))))

Right on!

 

BOXUAN

9:37 AM ET

February 16, 2011

@VIVID_HAZE

I assume you replied to me since I'm the only one before you, even though you deliberately spelled my name wrongly. To answer your question, yes, I do live in China and I view those sites almost everyday. If you don't believe it then I have nothing to do about it because I guess you are not in China. So maybe you can try some software to give you a Chinese IP, then do your own verification. Don't be easily misled by media!

 

XTIANGODLOKI

11:53 AM ET

February 16, 2011

The people's daily has articles on egypt on its front page

I don't get the reason why so many authors who have little or no idea about China's media (most of them can't even read Chinese) continue to make blanket statements about China's censorship. It really detracts from the otherwise good article.

People's daily, the main mouthpiece of the Chinese government does in fact talk about what's going on in Egypt. You can find it on the web too:
http://world.people.com.cn/GB/13927822.html

For those who can't read, the article talks about how the Egyptian military is promising to draft a constitution in 10 days in order to appease the democratic protesters.

It's true that Chinese media doesn't provide the extensive coverage of the revolution like the western media does, however China does provide some coverage enough to let people know that there is a popular revolution which overthrew the Egyptian government. Instead of having stories which portray only the positives of the revolution, the Chinese media focused more on the turmoil which is the result of the revolution (such as the fact that many middle class Egyptians are scared for their lives at night because police force is currently nonfunctional).

What will be interesting is the most recent story about the female reporter Logan getting sexually assaulted by the mob. As expected, the Western media does not specify the affiliation of the mob like they usually do when they are assaulted by the pro-government protesters ( tahrir square is known to be controlled by anti-mubarack protesters). Because portraying the protesters in a negative light may contradict their earlier message. However in China the government news stations may use this story to highlight the fact that the revolution is violent.

 

BILL888

11:15 AM ET

February 19, 2011

Blocked?

@XTIANGODLOKI

You are right. That Links talked about Egypt revolution. I guess the authority relax the blocking if you can read the following net in China.

www.yzzk.com

This one was blocked in China.

 

SCOOP

11:40 AM ET

February 22, 2011

Analysis: Discontent, but no revolt in China — yet

"China may have successfully squelched a mysterious call for protests Sunday, but people's trust that the government will look after their interests runs shallow. In the latest test, China's authoritarian government seems to have dispatched the threat of public protests with great efficiency. In response to an Internet appeal of unknown origin for simultaneous protests in 13 cities Sunday, police detained known activists, disconnected some cell-phone text messaging services and blocked online searches for the phrase 'Jasmine Revolution' — the name of both the protest call and the wave of Middle East democracy protests that started in Tunisia. Still few China watchers believe a revolution is at hand, following the mass demonstrations that swept the autocratic rulers of Tunisia and Egypt aside and are now violently engulfing Libya and roiling Algeria, Bahrain and Yemen."