BY TINA ROSENBERG | FEBRUARY 16, 2011

Early in 2008, workers at a government-owned textile factory in the Egyptian mill town of El-Mahalla el-Kubra announced that they were going on strike on the first Sunday in April to protest high food prices and low wages. They caught the attention of a group of tech-savvy young people an hour's drive to the south in the capital city of Cairo, who started a Facebook group to organize protests and strikes on April 6 throughout Egypt in solidarity with the mill workers. To their shock, the page quickly acquired some 70,000 followers.

But what worked so smoothly online proved much more difficult on the street. Police occupied the factory in Mahalla and headed off the strike. The demonstrations there turned violent: Protesters set fire to buildings, and police started shooting, killing at least two people. The solidarity protests around Egypt, meanwhile, fizzled out, in most places blocked by police. The Facebook organizers had never agreed on tactics, whether Egyptians should stay home or fill the streets in protest. People knew they wanted to do something. But no one had a clear idea of what that something was.

The botched April 6 protests, the leaders realized in their aftermath, had been an object lesson in the limits of social networking as a tool of democratic revolution. Facebook could bring together tens of thousands of sympathizers online, but it couldn't organize them once they logged off. It was a useful communication tool to call people to -- well, to what? The April 6 leaders did not know the answer to this question. So they decided to learn from others who did. In the summer of 2009, Mohamed Adel, a 20-year-old blogger and April 6 activist, went to Belgrade, Serbia.

The Serbian capital is home to the Center for Applied NonViolent Action and Strategies, or CANVAS, an organization run by young Serbs who had cut their teeth in the late 1990s student uprising against Slobodan Milosevic. After ousting him, they embarked on the ambitious project of figuring out how to translate their success to other countries. To the world's autocrats, they are sworn enemies -- both Venezuela's Hugo Chávez and Belarus's Aleksandr Lukashenko have condemned them by name. ("They think we are bringing a revolution in our suitcase," one of CANVAS's leaders told me.) But to a young generation of democracy activists from Harare to Rangoon to Minsk to Tehran, the young Serbs are heroes. They have worked with democracy advocates from more than 50 countries. They have advised groups of young people on how to take on some of the worst governments in the world -- and in Georgia, Ukraine, Syria-occupied Lebanon, the Maldives, and now Egypt, those young people won.

For More

Echoes of Belgrade
From Minsk to Cairo, uprisings that have been influenced by Serbia's 2000 Bulldozer Revolution.

In Belgrade, Adel took a week-long course in the strategies of nonviolent revolution. He learned how to organize people -- not on a computer, but in the streets. And most importantly, he learned how to train others. He went back to Egypt and began to teach. The April 6 Youth Movement, along with a similar group called Kefaya, became the most important organizers of the 18-day peaceful uprising that culminated in President Hosni Mubarak's departure on Feb. 11. "The April 6 Movement and Kifaya are the groups that have led the charge in actually getting protesters organized and onto the streets," a Feb. 3 report from the geopolitical analysis group Stratfor said. The tactics were straight out of CANVAS's training curriculum. "I got trained in how to conduct peaceful demonstrations, how to avoid violence, and how to face violence from the security forces … and also how to organize to get people on the streets," Adel said of his experience with the Serbs, in an interview with Al Jazeera English on Feb. 9. "We were quite amazed they did so much with so little," Srdja Popovic, one of CANVAS's leaders, told me.

Philip Blenkinsop

 SUBJECTS:
 

Tina Rosenberg is the author of the forthcoming Join the Club: How Peer Pressure Can Transform the World.

WESTERNSKEPTIC

11:36 AM ET

February 17, 2011

Hugo Chavez

Contrary to the misleading remarks in this otherwise well-written article, Hugo Chavez is not an autocrat. He is a populist, democratically elected leader who commands the support of a huge majority of the Venezuelan population. CANVAS, a USAID and NED-funded organization tried to advance US interests in the region and that is why they were chastised. The irony of a pro-democracy group trying to overthrow a leader who has been re-elected many times in fair elections leaves me to believe that CANVAS' definition of democracy really means "free-market neoliberalism". To even mention Chavez, a man who has saved Venezuela from the crippling economic policies of his US-supported predecessor, in the same breath as Aleksandr Lukashenko is reckless journalistic dishonesty.

I recommend this article for an alternate view of CANVAS: http://www.swans.com/library/art16/barker47.html

 

HASS

5:58 PM ET

February 17, 2011

Iran is different

Problem is, the government of Iran does NOT rely on "fear" to rule, and it is about time you stopped bunching so many different countries together. There is a large percentage of Iranians who DO support their regime, and who do regularly show up to vote in the elections (over 86%) that outsiders sneer at.

In fact Iranians are very sensitive to the idea of foreigners pushing to topple regimes in their country, and would resent any such training provided by Otpor or others to their people who will be labelled as agents of a foreign power.

 

CHOPSTIK

10:53 AM ET

February 18, 2011

Iranian elections?

If you wish to argue that Iranian elections have 86% voter participation (I would like your source for that), then I would point out that Saddam Hussein obtained 100% of the vote in his last election (which also saw 100% participation). You can argue that elections occur but there are also elections in China, Burma and any number of other countries that are tyrannical dictatorships. When Iran does not automatically disqualify half the candidates because they are "reformers" or "liberal", then it would be better to use them as a reference for your point.

And yes, Iranians are sensitive to the idea of foreigners pushing to interfere in their internal politics (even toppling their corrupt and bankrupt regime) - much the same as citizens in any other country in the world. That does not mean, however, that they don't want to see regime change in their own nation and are willing to seek outside help sometimes to accomplish it. While there are certainly supporters of the regime in the country, it seems unlikely that they number among the majority. And if you wish to argue that there are pro-government rallies and supporters - bear in mind how many of them are paid, bused-in and given signs and slogans at the rally by government operatives. Besides, there were pro-government supporters in Egypt and some more in Yemen, Jordan, Libya and Bahrain (among others) - do you view them as benignly as you seem to view those in Iran? Or is the basis for your argument more anti-US (which would place you in the pro-Iran by ideological default)?

To the article as a whole - a very interesting group and one that may be viewed through two very different lenses depending upon your given ideological bent. A case could be made to compare them against Wikileaks (under the operation of Julian Assange). It is not so black and white as it may seem in the open.

 

HASS

3:32 PM ET

February 25, 2011

Reality intrudes

Well Chopsix, hate to burst your bubble, but Iranians DO support their government and DO turn out to vote, and Iran is NOT comparable to Burma or Saddams' Iraq.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5j01lWEft-nSRiSucCk-EB-Y9lUPg?docId=CNG.5ecbda1132f2622b919e251d461cca6c.201

 

PROJEKTOGRADNJA

1:56 PM ET

February 18, 2011

We Serbs over through Milosevic

We Serbs over through Milosevic

Because he was wimp, un-nationalist, who was scared to fight for our people in Krajina Republic, and Serbian Republic of Bosnia. Wimp who was scared to fight for Kosovo, and was only concerned how to stay in power himself. That is the main reason why at the end we over through him. And not because of what Western regimes and media are saying.

 

ESHA

2:30 AM ET

February 19, 2011

Website for CANVAS

The website for CANVAS is down. I've been trying it since a few days..

Waiting for revolution in Africa..

 

MARKOB

11:55 PM ET

February 19, 2011

CANVAS Is For Everybody But The Serbs

I noticed that the article does not tell us what CANVAS is doing in Serbia itself, a country racked by poverty with people killing themselves out of despair, tycoons who control political life and who did not exist as a class prior to October 5 2000, where to get a job you need to join a political party, the media is controlled by the regime and the tycoons, where people are taking to the streets to protest the devastating effects of more than a decade of neoliberal reforms, where the labour movement is organizing strikes against IMF mandated government budgets and so on. Notice these are all the same affects that REALLY brought people to the streets in Egypt and Tunisia seeking a SOCIAL revolution. Lukashenko might be a thug but if you're a Belorussian you're probably better off than being a Serb. I predict that we will never, ever, see an article at FP going into great detail describing how the Egyptian labour movement and striking workers helped to oust Mubarak.

 

PKOULIEV

12:55 PM ET

February 20, 2011

Youth Revlution

Fist of all, thank you Tina Rosenberg for such informative feature analyzing and providing references for further reading. I think this article is more about the concept than comparing all details to accuracy. There is no written formula for any revolutions. They could be as bloody and chaotic as French Revolution, and as planned and organized with support of alternative institutions as American Revolution. There is message about using non-conventional methods and increasing interactivity instead of just reaction to tyranny suppression. Revolution in minds start any other creativity like using virtual world to put in use for more progress.

 

FRANTZ_LUBIN@HOTMAIL.COM

3:51 AM ET

February 21, 2011

A New Haitian Revolution, perhaps?

Well done Tina! This is a very informative piece. This sort of organizing is needed in Haiti right now. As we're experiencing a fraud-ridden election, the people need a new comprehensive strategy to obtain a real and credible democracy. CANVAS obviously provides some applicable techniques for community building, which as a result, can create a genuine solidarity at the bottom of the pyramid. Minus the political rhetoric, these ideas are intriguing. I’m surprised I never heard of this group.

Good stuff Rosenberg.

 

JULIO NUñEZ

8:12 AM ET

February 21, 2011

Pinochet and Allende

An excellent article containing much valuable information. However, I must tell you that Chile's cacerolazos sessions were held very effectively against Salvador Allende, not Pinochet. Pinochet held democratic elections, was defeated, accepted the verdict and went home. Unusual, is it not?

However, congratulations on the excellent article.