BY TINA ROSENBERG | FEBRUARY 16, 2011

"OK, good. You're developing parallel institutions," said Popovic. This was Adam Michnik's strategy for Solidarity in Poland: Don't tear down institutions -- build your own. "You did this to remove bodies after Cyclone Nargis" -- the 2008 disaster that killed more than 138,000 people in Burma -- "when the government would not. Now, what if the municipality doesn't care?"

"We'll dump the garbage in front of the mayor," said a tall man. Popovic laughed. "Or you could choose a lower-risk strategy -- take pictures of the garbage and present them to authorities," he said.

When the next group came to the front of the room, its members were smiling and, oddly, taking off their shoes. Their spokeswoman, a young woman in a pink shirt who was wriggling with excitement, proposed a "Barefoot Campaign," to commemorate the monks of the Saffron Revolution, who do not wear shoes. The idea was to start with 100 young people, contacted by email and social networks. They would do something simple: go barefoot in public spaces. "We can start with the pagodas," said Pink Shirt -- no one wears shoes in a pagoda anyway. And people could walk through paint, Pink Shirt said. "We can easily measure success -- if we see barefoot people and footprints everywhere."

"When the authorities respond with arrests, how will you respond?" Auntie asked. The group had thought through this. "For safety, people can carry a pair of broken sandals in their pocket to show the police," said a cherubic-faced young man. "Or you can say, 'I'm getting ready to go running.'"

The tall man halted their excitement. "If the authorities see you leaving footprints, they will know and arrest you."

"They won't know who it was if we do it at night," said the Cherub. "Let's do it!" He pumped his fist in the air. Everyone laughed.

But the footprints were a problem -- they could quite literally lead the police to their prey. Then a soft-spoken young woman in a gauze shirt spoke up. "There are lots of stray dogs and cats," she said. "We can put a dish of paint in front of where they live so they will walk through it." Cats and dogs as the foot soldiers of democracy! They looked at each other, awed by their own brilliance, and slapped hands all around.

Near the end of the week the group watched Burma VJ, a 2008 documentary by Danish director Anders Ostergaard about a group of clandestine Burmese video journalists, whose footage, smuggled out of the country, is often the only way the outside world knows what is happening in Burma. The film takes place during the Saffron Revolution; it is precious contraband in Burma, and most of the participants had seen it before. It is a document of hope and valor, a record of a few weeks many Burmese consider the high point of their lives. But after a week of CANVAS training, the Burmese were watching it with fresh eyes.

When the film ended, Djinovic walked to the front of the room. "So what did you think?" he said. The Cherub was wide-eyed. "This was not organized!" he said. Suddenly the Saffron Revolution looked very different. It was so brave, so inspiring -- and so improvised, foolish, and irresponsible. "People were going into the streets spontaneously, asking for something that is not achievable," Djinovic told them, perhaps not gentle enough as he razed their heroes. "Our advice," he said slowly, "is that you think about nonviolent struggle totally differently than you have seen in this movie."

Silence fell over the group.

"Then you know what you have to do," he said.

 

Philip Blenkinsop

 SUBJECTS:
 

Tina Rosenberg is the author of the forthcoming Join the Club: How Peer Pressure Can Transform the World.

WESTERNSKEPTIC

11:36 AM ET

February 17, 2011

Hugo Chavez

Contrary to the misleading remarks in this otherwise well-written article, Hugo Chavez is not an autocrat. He is a populist, democratically elected leader who commands the support of a huge majority of the Venezuelan population. CANVAS, a USAID and NED-funded organization tried to advance US interests in the region and that is why they were chastised. The irony of a pro-democracy group trying to overthrow a leader who has been re-elected many times in fair elections leaves me to believe that CANVAS' definition of democracy really means "free-market neoliberalism". To even mention Chavez, a man who has saved Venezuela from the crippling economic policies of his US-supported predecessor, in the same breath as Aleksandr Lukashenko is reckless journalistic dishonesty.

I recommend this article for an alternate view of CANVAS: http://www.swans.com/library/art16/barker47.html

 

HASS

5:58 PM ET

February 17, 2011

Iran is different

Problem is, the government of Iran does NOT rely on "fear" to rule, and it is about time you stopped bunching so many different countries together. There is a large percentage of Iranians who DO support their regime, and who do regularly show up to vote in the elections (over 86%) that outsiders sneer at.

In fact Iranians are very sensitive to the idea of foreigners pushing to topple regimes in their country, and would resent any such training provided by Otpor or others to their people who will be labelled as agents of a foreign power.

 

CHOPSTIK

10:53 AM ET

February 18, 2011

Iranian elections?

If you wish to argue that Iranian elections have 86% voter participation (I would like your source for that), then I would point out that Saddam Hussein obtained 100% of the vote in his last election (which also saw 100% participation). You can argue that elections occur but there are also elections in China, Burma and any number of other countries that are tyrannical dictatorships. When Iran does not automatically disqualify half the candidates because they are "reformers" or "liberal", then it would be better to use them as a reference for your point.

And yes, Iranians are sensitive to the idea of foreigners pushing to interfere in their internal politics (even toppling their corrupt and bankrupt regime) - much the same as citizens in any other country in the world. That does not mean, however, that they don't want to see regime change in their own nation and are willing to seek outside help sometimes to accomplish it. While there are certainly supporters of the regime in the country, it seems unlikely that they number among the majority. And if you wish to argue that there are pro-government rallies and supporters - bear in mind how many of them are paid, bused-in and given signs and slogans at the rally by government operatives. Besides, there were pro-government supporters in Egypt and some more in Yemen, Jordan, Libya and Bahrain (among others) - do you view them as benignly as you seem to view those in Iran? Or is the basis for your argument more anti-US (which would place you in the pro-Iran by ideological default)?

To the article as a whole - a very interesting group and one that may be viewed through two very different lenses depending upon your given ideological bent. A case could be made to compare them against Wikileaks (under the operation of Julian Assange). It is not so black and white as it may seem in the open.

 

HASS

3:32 PM ET

February 25, 2011

Reality intrudes

Well Chopsix, hate to burst your bubble, but Iranians DO support their government and DO turn out to vote, and Iran is NOT comparable to Burma or Saddams' Iraq.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5j01lWEft-nSRiSucCk-EB-Y9lUPg?docId=CNG.5ecbda1132f2622b919e251d461cca6c.201

 

PROJEKTOGRADNJA

1:56 PM ET

February 18, 2011

We Serbs over through Milosevic

We Serbs over through Milosevic

Because he was wimp, un-nationalist, who was scared to fight for our people in Krajina Republic, and Serbian Republic of Bosnia. Wimp who was scared to fight for Kosovo, and was only concerned how to stay in power himself. That is the main reason why at the end we over through him. And not because of what Western regimes and media are saying.

 

ESHA

2:30 AM ET

February 19, 2011

Website for CANVAS

The website for CANVAS is down. I've been trying it since a few days..

Waiting for revolution in Africa..

 

MARKOB

11:55 PM ET

February 19, 2011

CANVAS Is For Everybody But The Serbs

I noticed that the article does not tell us what CANVAS is doing in Serbia itself, a country racked by poverty with people killing themselves out of despair, tycoons who control political life and who did not exist as a class prior to October 5 2000, where to get a job you need to join a political party, the media is controlled by the regime and the tycoons, where people are taking to the streets to protest the devastating effects of more than a decade of neoliberal reforms, where the labour movement is organizing strikes against IMF mandated government budgets and so on. Notice these are all the same affects that REALLY brought people to the streets in Egypt and Tunisia seeking a SOCIAL revolution. Lukashenko might be a thug but if you're a Belorussian you're probably better off than being a Serb. I predict that we will never, ever, see an article at FP going into great detail describing how the Egyptian labour movement and striking workers helped to oust Mubarak.

 

PKOULIEV

12:55 PM ET

February 20, 2011

Youth Revlution

Fist of all, thank you Tina Rosenberg for such informative feature analyzing and providing references for further reading. I think this article is more about the concept than comparing all details to accuracy. There is no written formula for any revolutions. They could be as bloody and chaotic as French Revolution, and as planned and organized with support of alternative institutions as American Revolution. There is message about using non-conventional methods and increasing interactivity instead of just reaction to tyranny suppression. Revolution in minds start any other creativity like using virtual world to put in use for more progress.

 

FRANTZ_LUBIN@HOTMAIL.COM

3:51 AM ET

February 21, 2011

A New Haitian Revolution, perhaps?

Well done Tina! This is a very informative piece. This sort of organizing is needed in Haiti right now. As we're experiencing a fraud-ridden election, the people need a new comprehensive strategy to obtain a real and credible democracy. CANVAS obviously provides some applicable techniques for community building, which as a result, can create a genuine solidarity at the bottom of the pyramid. Minus the political rhetoric, these ideas are intriguing. I’m surprised I never heard of this group.

Good stuff Rosenberg.

 

JULIO NUñEZ

8:12 AM ET

February 21, 2011

Pinochet and Allende

An excellent article containing much valuable information. However, I must tell you that Chile's cacerolazos sessions were held very effectively against Salvador Allende, not Pinochet. Pinochet held democratic elections, was defeated, accepted the verdict and went home. Unusual, is it not?

However, congratulations on the excellent article.