'Internet Freedom' in the Age of Assange

From Egyptian Facebookers to WikiLeaks to China's Great Firewall, the State Department's efforts to promote an open global Internet just got a lot more complicated.

BY REBECCA MACKINNON | FEBRUARY 17, 2011

 

Clinton sought to distance the State Department from individual American politicians who have called for Julian Assange's head. She made the point that the U.S. government did not pressure private companies like Amazon.com and Paypal to sever their ties with WikiLeaks.  Yet it is well known that these companies were influenced by State Department Legal Advisor Harold Koh's letter on WikiLeaks, in which he wrote that the "violation of law is ongoing" as long as WikiLeaks continues to publish the leaked diplomatic cables. As Harvard legal scholar Yochai Benkler wrote in response to Tuesday's speech, the assertion that publication of the cables is illegal "is false, as a matter of constitutional law; but it is not in fact stated, it is merely implied by omission; this leaves room for various extralegal avenues that can be denied as not under your control to do the suppression work."

Concerns about extralegal actions by companies who can shut down controversial -- but arguably constitutionally protected -- speech before any court has even ruled on a publisher's guilt or innocence highlight how governments are not the only actors with a responsibility to make and uphold commitments to free expression and privacy.

Clinton was certainly right to highlight the fact that corporations running Internet platforms and telecommunications services have equally serious obligations to uphold universally recognized rights to free expression and privacy, particularly when governments fail to respect these rights.  Companies around the world face strong pressure to censor, monitor, and silence users and customers when it suits government interests. The Egyptian government's shutdown of Internet and mobile services could not have succeeded without the private sector's cooperation. Research In Motion, the owner of BlackBerry, has been asked by a range of governments to comply with surveillance requirements. Some activists are concerned that Facebook is making it easier for governments to track them down by enforcing terms of service requiring the use of real names, no matter where in the world you live.

It was thus encouraging that Clinton called on companies to join the Global Network Initiative, a multi-stakeholder effort by companies, socially responsible investors, human rights groups, and academics to help companies make and uphold such commitments. Unfortunately only Google, Microsoft, and Yahoo have had the cojones (as former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright would put it) to join.

Getty Images/Brendan Smialowski

 SUBJECTS:
 

Rebecca MacKinnon is a Bernard L. Schwartz Senior Fellow at the New America Foundation. She is co-founder of the global citizen media project Global Voices Online and a founding board member of the Global Network Initiative. Her book, Consent of the Networked, will be published by Basic Books in January 2012.

NAMEYNAME

5:57 AM ET

February 18, 2011

Right.

Is this the same speech during which a silent protested was beaten by official goons?

http://www.bradblog.com/?p=8360

 

MTRANCHI

7:12 AM ET

February 18, 2011

freedom of the press, freedom of speech

When the founding fathers gave the right to freedom of the press, they meant the printing press, the only technology available at the time for the mass-dissemination of ideas and information.

Realizing this, freedom of the press is really the same thing as freedom of speech: I write down what i want to say, copy it many times, give it to others.

Article 19 of the U.N. Universal Declaration of Human Rights brings this into the 21st century: “Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom . . . to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.” Which, as you can see, essentially combines the two concepts of freedom of speech and freedom of the press, and also adds a third, freedom to receive, which was denied the people of Egypt recently with the shutdown of the internet and cell-phone service. And just in case there's confusion as to what media, singular medium means, it's "intermediate agency, channel of communication." In other words, the internet is a member of the media.

If you think about it, all confidentiality agreements, including whatever the gov’t calls whatever they have a gov’t official sign before giving him/her a level of clearance, is unconstitutional, or at least any laws which enforce such agreements. The word “except” is not in the first amendment.

 

XTIANGODLOKI

12:03 PM ET

February 18, 2011

So how is Bradly Manning so different from Liu Xiao Bu again?

Both broke domestic laws, so why support one and not the other. The cable leaks are not as much of a big deal as the videos of civilian killings. Yet the media' treatment of Manning is far different from the "freedom fighters" of other places.

The US state dept is grappling with the concept of "internet freedom" because it knows it's a double edged sword. Like any government the US supports conditional liberalizations and oppose changes which are not in the interest of the US. However publicly the US government will not admit to its realism foreign policy views and instead paint itself as some kind of moralistic saint to save others. The US media happily goes along with the US government, even when its personalities (and people like Mackinnon) go onto criticize how other government's media operate as propaganda machines for the government. When it comes to foreign policy the US media is not much different. So why the hypocrisy?

 

FACEMAN

11:34 PM ET

February 20, 2011

free internet

We understood on egyptian revolution internet is important tool it can even change countries future. Internet should be freer and reachable to anybody. I believe it's one of human right. Facebook, twitter, google all these servicing humanity.

It does not emphasize an idealogy but gather people who has same idea and belief and those people can act on their sorrow together with more power thanks to facebook groups, twits etc.