A Regime We Can Trust

How did the West get Qaddafi so wrong?

BY CAMERON ABADI | FEBRUARY 22, 2011

When Muammar al-Qaddafi assumed power in Libya in 1969 by means of a military coup d'état, he seemed intent on cultivating the status of international pariah: He banned all political opposition, loudly advocated sweeping Islamist ideologies that demanded the reordering of the international system, picked territorial fights with neighbors, and supported terrorists from the Irish Republican Army to the Palestine Liberation Organization. If his goal was to isolate himself and his country, Qaddafi was largely successful in his first three decades as head of state, even earning comprehensive U.N. economic sanctions.

But if Qaddafi never admitted the error of his ways, he eventually learned how to minimize the effect his erratic personality and repressive political inclinations had on his regime's pursuit of stable relations with the rest of the world. By the time Qaddafi renounced the pursuit of weapons of mass destruction in 2004, the international community was eager to begin patching up relations. Qaddafi made up for his years of solitude with a number of high-profile trips to Europe, as well as to the U.N. -- though the lingering effects of isolation expressed themselves in his sometimes bizarre behavior and statements. Once interpreted as signs of pathology, Qaddafi's eccentricities were redefined as mere personality quirks.

But now that Qaddafi's brutality has returned full force -- with his giving orders in recent days for indiscriminate attacks on protesters throughout Libya -- there are more than a few in the West who may wish they can forget these past several years' worth of photo ops.

 SUBJECTS: DIPLOMACY, MIDDLE EAST
 

Cameron Abadi is an associate editor of Foreign Policy.

KEVINSD

11:33 PM ET

February 22, 2011

You can't wake someone who is not asleep

I don't get the author's point. From the Wikileaks disclosures to the investigation into Scotland's freeing of al-Megrahi, everything we've learned suggests that the West's grasp of Qaddaffi and his regime was quite keen. Unfortunately, we've also learned that when their own self-interest is involved we can't many of our foreign policy and corporate elites to do the right thing. One can't put the planners of the Lockerbee murders on the same level as those who would set murderers free so they could get some juicy contracts, I'll grant you, but both should shock the conscience.

 

LEARNFROMHISTORYUSA

2:43 AM ET

February 23, 2011

His son's names explain the entire human crisis in the mid east

Nothing has changed in Libya, and the Colonel sure hasn't. He's just showing his true colors. He said he wants to die a martyr, this is an enormous event in history where a leader of a nation wants to die a martyr. This is the absolute worst scenario that he was able to utter them senseless evil words out of his mouth, the future could have multiple leaders saying those exact words. i.e. Syria, Iran, or any other radical muslim dictator. The middle east and Islam in general has been a bomb waiting to explode. It is like an uncontrollable wildfire set ablaze. When is the line going to be drawn in the sand where enough is enough? If the last 20 years tells us anything we better extinguish or defuse this horrific situation now. If not we risk fighting a 50 year war...This is a religious war believe it or not. We better be planning some major strategic shifts now before it's too late...Things are changing over night these day's we cannot afford to keep believing we can appease or negotiate with Islam. If this Libyan massacre doesn't show the true colors of this disease I don't know what will.

 

JUAN67

7:59 PM ET

February 23, 2011

@LEARNFROMHISTORY

@LEARNFROMHISTORY, it seems that you know a little about Libya, I lived there for many years and I know 4 sure that Islam has nothing to do with this mad dog's defiance. He simply has no where to go, he knows that he is dead at the end of this anyway , so he chose a stand which he thinks will give him a honorable death, he is trying to bring the West to the fight so he dies fighting his eternal enemy, he cares so much about what history will tell on him and he genuinely believes that he is a great man who could effect the whole world.

 

WS

11:51 PM ET

February 22, 2011

The West misjudged the Arab masses, not their dictators

The governments of the West have always espoused democratic values while making deals with dictators when it served their geopolitical interests. There is nothing new in this. It may be embarrassing, at this historic moment, to see the video on Aljezeera of Blair so warmly embracing Qaddafi on his visit to Libya. But he had good reason to seek a rapprochement. Blair was looking for oil deals and the ruthless support of Qaddafi in 'the war on terror'.

It was well known among Western intelligence that Qaddafi was absolutely ruthless in suppressing opposition within Libya. Western leaders didn't misjudge the man. Their calculus was simply that it didn't matter. The Arab masses were grumblers but they would never rise up against their rulers. Dictators like Qadaffi -- in power for 40 years -- appeared to be durable. Their brutal control was well managed and largely hidden from sight. In the West, we looked the other way while filling up our SUVs. The suffering of the Arab people under brutal dictators was regrettable, but it didn't really matter in the larger scheme of things. Blair could fulminate against Saddam for gassing the Kurds, and use this to justify joining the US invasion of Iraq, while embracing Qadaffi. Did he imagine that Qaddafi was incapable of resorting to mass murder to suppress an uprising of his people -- as Saddam had done? Not if he was reading British intelligence reports. He just never imagined it would be necessary on a mass scale.

What the West 'got wrong' was the Arab masses, especially the youth. It is their courageous struggles for democracy that have revealed the West's hypocricy -- trumpeting democratic values while propping up repressive rulers. Now they are toppling, and Western leaders are "shocked" -- as if they didn't really know what these regimes were capable of.

 

BEINGTHERE

8:31 AM ET

February 24, 2011

Reagan and Thatcher did not get Qadaffi wrong ...

The U.S. forgets lessons it supposedly has learned in its relatively short history about "strong men." Dictators - most of them sociopaths at the least - don't change their strategies of oppression. Take Karzai ....

Intellectuals at Foreign Policy must keep reminding us why the U.S. is in Afghanistan, other than to support a strong man and his corruption. Of course, there is something in it for the already-rich contractors, and it does involve Bob Gates' legacy and an upward path for David Petraeus' brilliant career. Wait ... this was about dictators and their keeping on doing what they know, year after year after year, often with help from democracies ...

 

ROMANIX

5:45 PM ET

February 24, 2011

Learn from the Arab masses

>> WS: What the West 'got wrong' was the Arab masses, especially the youth.

Maybe the West learns something from those masses and rebels against the dominance of multi-national companies. Well, it's unlikely, but who knows...

 

PFOLLERS

1:55 PM ET

February 27, 2011

The middle east and Islam in

The middle east and Islam in general has been a bomb waiting to explode. It is like an uncontrollable wildfire set ablaze. When is the line going to be drawn in the sand where enough is enough? If the last 20 years tells us anything we better extinguish or defuse this horrific situation now. If not we risk fighting a 50 year war...This is a religious war believe it or not. We better be planning some major strategic shifts now before it's too late...Things are changing over night these day's we cannot afford to keep believing we can appease or negotiate with Islam. If this Libyan massacre doesn't show the true colors of this disease I don't know what will.

 

HAGELADUKI

9:26 AM ET

February 28, 2011

The human crisis is going to the world

Nothing has changed in Libya, and the Colonel Calories in a Banana sure hasn't. Just like Karzai and his brothers were always GHW Bushes toadies.