The End of the Arab Dream

Muammar al-Qaddafi's fall won't just mark the close of an awful dictatorship -- it will end the Arab world's disastrous half-century-long affair with utopian governing fantasies.

BY JAMES TRAUB | FEBRUARY 25, 2011

If Muammar al-Qaddafi falls, as seems increasingly likely, he will land with the rending crash of an immense, rigid object, like the statue of Saddam Hussein pulled down in Baghdad's Firdos Square. This is not because, despite his own delusions, Qaddafi mattered to the world remotely as much as Saddam did. Rather, it's because the Jamahiriya, or stateless society, he fostered in Libya constitutes the last of the revolutionary fantasies with which Arab leaders have mesmerized their citizens and justified their ruthless acts of repression since the establishment of the modern Arab world in the years after World War II.

Qaddafi and the other junior officers who overthrew Libya's King Idris in a bloodless coup in 1969 were inspired by the revolt of the Free Officers in Egypt, who had similarly deposed an unpopular, pro-Western monarch in 1952. The Free Officers under Gamal Abdel Nasser declared a new socialist regime, confiscating the properties and eliminating the privileges of the old elite. Especially after the Bandung Conference of nonaligned nations in 1955, Nasser's pan-Arab vision, which would dissolve colonial borders in order to establish an Arab superstate, became the default ideology of a generation of young thinkers and activists in the Middle East.

The leaders of the Libyan coup also called themselves the Free Officers. Nasser's own reputation had been destroyed by the disastrous outcome of the 1967 war with Israel, but Qaddafi and his co-conspirators saw themselves as the new generation of Arab revolutionaries. "Tell President Nasser we made this revolution for him," Qaddafi said in the aftermath of the coup. "He can take everything of ours and add it to the rest of the Arab world's resources to be used for the battle [against Israel, and for Arab unity]." Over the next few years, Qaddafi would forge pacts with his neighbors, including Chad, Egypt, and Sudan -- all of them far more populous than Libya -- in a vain and mostly ludicrous pursuit of Nasser's dream of a pan-Arab state.

The Libyan leader's ambitions turned out to be yet more grandiose than Nasser's. Qaddafi's Green Book, first published in 1975, offered a design for a state ruled directly by its own citizens with none of the usual mediating institutions -- parties, parliaments, even central government. The revolution would abolish as well the institutions of private ownership. "Whoever possesses the house in which you dwell, the vehicle in which you ride or the income on which you live," Qaddafi wrote, "possesses your freedom, or part of it." This freedom, however, belonged not to the individual but to the collective, for "the individual is linked to the larger family of humankind like a leaf is to a branch or a branch to a tree. They have no value or life if they are separated." The Green Book was an exercise, if a daft one, in utopian totalitarianism.

YouTube

 

James Traub is a contributing writer for the New York Times Magazine and author of, most recently, The Freedom Agenda. "Terms of Engagement," his column for ForeignPolicy.com, runs weekly.

USAMA2

2:31 AM ET

February 27, 2011

Pathetic. Nonsensical. It

Pathetic. Nonsensical.
It sounds like Traub is afraid and is spouting hot air to compensate for his shrivelling gonads.

The Arab world has been subjugated through tyranny and repression on behalf of the West and now that shroud of fear is lifted. Qaddafi is part of a long list of rulers who's significance has been in repressing his own people well enough so Western interests can peacefully advance in his country.

For the time, the fear of one's entire family and tribe being killed is lifted. And Libyans know its better for 10s of 1000s to fight and go their deaths to oust Qaddafi rather than millions have to endure another 40 years of subjugation.

Arabs and Muslims know who is behind Qaddafi and his lot. Qaddafi was trained at the Royal Military Academy at Sandhurst where Mi6 recruited him and staged a coup around him. The Arab League was created in Cairo in 1945 when the British were still controlling Egypt and most of the rest of the region.

The world is getting smaller and the fear is being lifted.

 

ABURAIHI

3:37 AM ET

February 27, 2011

Very nice.

Condoleezza Rice said once that we support stability in the middle East, not democracy. The U.S.'s policy was to support the dictatorship in the Middle East. Again and again, the revolution in the Middle East is against our undemocratic regimes and the U.S.'s policy. We this time will decide our fate and destiny.

 

ERIC TREANOR

1:35 PM ET

February 27, 2011

Theater vs. Sacrifice

Conflating the image of Saddam's fallen statue with the collapse of Qaddafi's regime is intellectually disingenuous.

The first "fall" was an act of political theater perpetrated by an occupying army. The second fall, when it occurs, will have been earned by the blood, determination, and sacrifice of the Libyan people.

Pretending by analogy that the two events are even remotely similar destroys a distinction that we must never forget.

 

CHAFAON

2:22 PM ET

February 27, 2011

Contestable!!

A pritty over-loaded "Westcentric" view that appears to try a bit too hard to down-play the role of Islamic Revivalism as a live and moving force in this current wave of Arab Uprising.

I particularly contest the view that "This is the Arab ...world's exit into history...". The writer's insistent reference to Arab violence against Israel is another slopy attempt at hitting hard but on the wrong nail.

But for all it's sloppiness, the article highlights some interesting, but largely obvious, observations concerning the wrotten state of affairs of governance in the Arab World.

 

ZMAN

8:14 PM ET

February 27, 2011

What utter and complete nonsense!

Kudos to James Traub for packing so many falsehoods and non-sequiturs into a single article!

Charlie Sheen called. He wants to know what drugs Traub was on when he wrote this. It was obviously some powerful stuff.

Qadhaffi was never "a popular hero in the Arab world" . He was always seen as a madman and rightfully so. Whatever following he had was bought (or rather rented) with petrodollars and vanished as soon as the payments stopped.

The reason it barely took a decade for Russians to "tire of their messy experiment with freedom, and embrace Vladimir Putin's soft authoritarianism" is that during that decade they got fleeced by the oligarchs with the help and complicity of American financial institutions and consultants.

 

BETTY212

10:06 PM ET

February 27, 2011

clinton fight

Clinton disclosed that the administration is now in communication with some of the opposition groups amid efforts to help minimize bloodshed and ensure an orderly transition. A former Libyan justice minister claimed last week to have established a provisional government in rebel-held Benghazi, but Clinton did not specifically endorse any of the numerous factions that have taken up arms against Gaddafi.
http://www.jbradsblog.com/simple-tips-in-saving-the-forest/

 

MATC

12:15 AM ET

February 28, 2011

What if it is both Islamic and Arabic?

I was thinking, if the new regimes realize that they need to pick up both Islamism and pan-Arab as political doctrines, would they look more powerful? One might argue the fall of dictatoral regimes is a fall of pan-Arab nationalism. Nationalism does not have to be authoritarian. What if the new Islamic Democracies in the Middleast decide to pick up Arab Nationalism as another populist cause and they successfully combine the two neatly into one Islamic Arab Nationalism?

 

BDMNTN

9:47 AM ET

February 28, 2011

wow amazing

amazing how uninformed this writer is. sounds like it was written by an octogenarian who's steady diet of usa today has washed through him like steady milk resulting in an oozing excrement.

too tired to point out the many flaws, but how's this for glaring stupiditiy:

"It took barely a decade for Russians to throw off the yoke of Communism, tire of their messy experiment with freedom, and embrace Vladimir Putin's soft authoritarianism."

tire of their messy experiment with freedom? maybe you're joking? the shock capitalism approach, similar to the one implemented by brener et. al in iraq, maybe considered free in american doublespeak, but was it really free?

free from fear? nope - crime was out of control - free from authoritarianism? no, the greedy and well connected all became billionaires, dictating the lives of ordinary russians through market-prices at least as much as the waning days of the ussr. free to live nihilist lives, perhaps, so yay freedom!

was it 'their' experiment with freedom? most would agree that it was not the russian people's experiment, any more than the ussr was a people's republic. the role outsiders played in bringing about shock capitalism through the imf and other means, however, is totally ignored by this trite statement.

it echoes the stick in the author's eye throughout this whole piece. no wonder this magazine is for america's elite - a nice bubble to feel warm in, those stupid fucking arabs, those stupid russians with their failed freedom, how come they didn't take well to rapid privatization? they're fucking idiots not like us!

 

REDWELL

3:57 PM ET

February 28, 2011

BDMNTN, thanks for elevating

BDMNTN, thanks for elevating the debate here at FP. Democratic dialogue is now a little bit more empowered than it was at 9:46 this morning.

 

PROPHET

7:48 PM ET

February 28, 2011

Utopian Dream Palaces, old, new and old!

Does Traub really believe that Arab dreams of authoritarian utopias are being replaced by democracy? The reality, of course, is that old Islamist utopia will most likely replace the current dictatorships, with new dictatorships like in Iran, and these religious dictatorships will be much worse that what they've removed. Murder, mayhem and martyrdom seem to be synonymous in the Arab street as well as in their dream palaces (read mosques). The general populations of theses Arab nations are brave and desiring a better way of life free from oppression. However, radical Islam will undoubtedly be thinking their time has come, and are working towards deceiving the populaces that Sharia Law and Islamic Republics are the only answer to achieve the Utopias, they've been conditioned to believe in. This is the jihadist's dream come true. But it will be darkness appearing as light, and the nightmare that is about to descend on the middle East is not only prophetic but apocalyptic!