A Return to Hell in Swat

The Pakistani Army -- and Gen. David Petraeus -- treated the counterinsurgency effort in the Swat Valley as a monumental success. A year later, things on the ground look quite a bit different.

BY TARA MCKELVEY | MARCH 2, 2011

On a sunny afternoon last fall, I took a Chinook helicopter flight to the grounds of a former boarding school in Pakistan's Swat Valley, where I drank chai with a Pashto-speaking Special Services Group commando. In the meadow where we sat, the air was filled with the scent of valley flowers. Yet this idyllic place, the commando told me, had once been controlled by militants.

"What was it like under the Taliban?" I asked.

"Simple," he said. "Just three words: H-E-L-L."

His arithmetic may have been imprecise, but the message was clear: The Pakistani Taliban, or Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which intermittently ruled this verdant, lush region of about 4,000 square miles from 2007 to 2009, held it with an iron fist, lashing people in public and posting "Taliban" signs outside police stations. Then they were thoroughly routed -- or at least it seemed so at the time. The Pakistani Army started an ambitious, U.S.-backed counterinsurgency effort against the TTP in the spring of 2009, the first operation of its kind in the country. The campaign was held up both in Pakistan and abroad as a model of military tactics: "They have done quite impressive operations in Swat Valley," U.S. Gen. David Petraeus told NPR in December 2009. In a hopeful sign that the counterinsurgency has made progress in suppressing the TTP, the Pakistani newspaper Dawn recently reported that the military is starting to turn over responsibility for the security of Swat to local police officials.

Talking to Pakistani Army officials, you get more of this rosy picture: The TTP has been pushed out; Swat is rebuilding; Pakistan has perfected its counterinsurgency tactics. And the United States has banked heavily on Pakistan's counterinsurgency program, appropriating $1.2 billion for a Pakistani counterinsurgency fund and training Pakistani officers in the doctrine.

But the reality of the last year in Swat is quite different. Instead of curing the disease, Pakistan's supposed counterinsurgency attack has in some ways only fed it. And America is continuing to funnel money to a government with no intention of using it to fight the terrorists in its midst. Talk to people like the Swat commando, and it's clear that plenty of Pakistanis in the Swat Valley and elsewhere truly want the area to remain peaceful and for the terrorist attacks that have been roiling the rest of the country to stop. No one wants to go back to hell. So why is the Swat Valley -- and Pakistan -- having so much trouble avoiding doing that?


The problems in the Swat Valley started in October 2007, when a TTP commander named Maulana Fazlullah took over Mingora, the largest city in the area, and began a reign  of terror, assassinating "medical staff for administering polio vaccines to children" and hanging bodies from trees and in busy roundabouts, according to a June 2009 report from the Islamabad Policy Research Institute. In November 2007, the Pakistani military sent five brigades, 17 infantry battalions, and five artillery regiments into Swat Valley and drove out the TTP. Then the military left and the TTP returned; once again the military plowed back in again. Over the next two years, this cycle of "blow up; patch up; blow up" repeated itself several times, as Haider Ali Hussein Mullick wrote in a report last year for the Australian Strategic Policy Institute.

A Majeed/AFP/Getty Images

 

Tara McKelvey, author of Monstering: Inside America's Policy of Secret Interrogations and Torture in the Terror War, was a 2010 Carnegie/Medill national security fellow.

ZULUMIDMORNING

12:04 AM ET

March 3, 2011

Route to hell

Very interesting article. One thing though - leading with an anecdote about a commando's bad English seems a little patronizing. He sounds childish - hence incompetent - where in reality, talking to someone like this will be a good deal edgier and more nuanced. And he is speaking your native language.

Since 'routed' is misspelled 'route' in the fourth paragraph, it would be a bit like someone ironically referencing your grasp of English verb tenses - even though this was not the cause of the mistake, and wholly beside the point of your writing ability.

Sorry to sound like a troll. But in an otherwise excellent piece, this bit stood out as somewhat disrespectful - and of a man whose life will be shaped, and perhaps circumscribed, by a situation that you are simply able to dip a toe into.

Again, if this isn't helpful, sorry for such banal criticism. I'm sure everyone who comes to write for FP has been hit over the head with Edward Said plenty.

 

ARYABHAT

7:31 AM ET

March 3, 2011

"Marketing Myopia" of Pak Army

When a Marketing professional creates a product range, he/she creates a brand, its packaging, thinks through and sets price, etc. etc. Thus when the product reaches its end of life in product life cycle, the Marketing Manager is the last one to realise it and plan its cull. It is called "Marketing Myopia" which is actually every creator's emotional response for its creation.

Pakistan is a "Rentier" (always seeking favours for its geo strategic location and doing dirty work of highest bidder) and "Spoiler" (again, doing dirty work of highest bidder/s) state. As Army of such a state, Pak Army has manufactured various products on Islamic Militancy, since 1947(sending Tayafawallas- Afghan nomads in Kashmir as fighters to forcibally annex it).

This creator - Pak Army - has the same myopia for its product range - Islamic Militancy. Product covers entire range with various packaging, pricing and branding, TTP, LeT, Jaish-e-Mohammed, Al-Queda, Afghan Taliban, Haqqanis, Quetta Shura, Hekmatyar, Panjabi Taliban, etc. "Marketing Manager" was/is ISI.

Till this Marketing Manager isn't changed, you will never see this product range go out of market.

American and Western approach is to plead the same Marketing Manager to adapt/change its product or reduce its sales/operations in certain territories, like Western world.

This would never work. On needs tocompletely detroy this menace and ISI would never kills its creation.

Dismantle ISI first. For world peace.

And its product - Taliban/Al-Queda etc. - will disappear in some time, direction less, rudderless.

 

MARTY MARTEL

10:07 AM ET

March 3, 2011

Dog and pony show put up by Pakistani Army

Pakistani Army had put up a dog and pony show in Swat Valley to milk Uncle Sam. General Petraeus had to praise hid buddy General Kayani, never mind the dog and pony show.

“The operation is a joke just to please the foreign masters," so said Saidalam Mehsud, 59, a burly driver from Dera Ismail Khan in South Waziristan at the time. "Whenever the dollars are floating into Pakistan, such operations are carried out." This observation reported in Washington Post on 10/28/09 aptly described how Pakistani government and army had intended to spend US aid to prove its bona fides against terrorism to minions in Washington.

With media totally kept out of the operational areas, one had only the Pakistani military’s claims to go by, which were often far removed from reality. One needs to be particularly wary. Powerful sections in the Pakistani armed forces and the ISI have close links with the Taliban and Al Qaeda, and even others regard both as instruments for a future takeover of Afghanistan after the US pulls out. They will want to proclaim victory right now while leaving sizeable sections of both fanatical organizations intact for a future offensive.

Let us NOT forget that nobody forced Pakistani government to facilitate relocation of Osama bin Laden from Sudan to Afghanistan in 1996. Pakistan’s democratic government chose to do so of its own free will.

Let us NOT forget that nobody forced Pakistani Army and Intelligence to create what ex-CIA official Bruce Reidel called ‘this jihadist Frankenstein’ monster in 1990s. Pakistani Army and Intelligence chose to do so with the full financing provided by Pakistan’s democratic governments at the time.

Let us NOT forget that Sandy Berger, Clinton’s national security advisor told 9/11 Commission in 2004: 'Pakistani Army was the midwife of Taliban'. UN report on Bhutto killing released on 4/15/10 confirmed this fact when it noted that "The PAKISTANI MILITARY ORGANIZED AND SUPPORTED THE TALIBAN TO TAKE CONTROL OF AFGHANISTAN IN 1996“.

As reported by Times of London on 9/28/09, Pakistani government started to relocate Afghan Taliban’s Quetta Shura Taliban leaders to Karachi to protect them from impending US drone attacks on Quetta after the submittal of General McChrystal’s assessment to President Obama in August, 2009.

Duplicitous Pakistan has poor U. S. over the barrel. US can NOT use its aid leverage to force Pakistan to stop sheltering, nurturing and supporting terrorist groups who kill US/NATO troops in Afghanistan day in and day out since 2001 because US needs Pakistan’s help in ferrying supplies to those very US/NATO troops.

With an ally like Pakistan, US never had a chance of winning in Afghanistan.

 

SALEEM ALI

12:48 PM ET

March 3, 2011

Rather one-sided

Having been the Swat many times, this article is totally one-sided. Compared to the Taliban predicament, the situation is MUCH better. Girls are going to school at least and there is a new university which has opened up.

Considering the damage done during their reign of terror, the progress in Swat is quite commendable.

Yes, we should keep the pressure on the government and the army to do more but dont throw the baby out with the bathwater.