Russian Revolution? No Thanks.

Faced with persistent grumbling from citizens, the Kremlin responds in the usual way: blaming the West.

BY MIRIAM ELDER | MARCH 2, 2011

MOSCOW — On Feb. 21, the Libyan air force swooped in on protesters in Tripoli, opening fire on a crowd that had joined the uprising against Col. Muammar al-Qaddafi. That same day, Boris Yakemenko, a high-ranking ideologist for the pro-Kremlin youth group Nashi, decided it was a good moment to offer his own take on events.

"Libyan leader Col. M. Qaddafi has shown the whole world how to treat provocateurs who aim for revolution, destabilization, and civil war," Yakemenko wrote in an essay titled "The Right Path," posted on his blog and on Nashi's official website.

"He started to destroy them. He used rockets and everything he has," Yakemenko wrote. "This is the most accurate path to ending American 'revolutionary' technologies."

His words would seem like the ravings of a madman -- if they did not ring so close to statements made by Russia's leadership since the unrest riling the Middle East broke out in January. Intrinsically frightened by revolution and by recent polls showing widespread agitation and mistrust of the government, the Kremlin is striking pre-emptively: hinting that the revolutions are Western-backed overthrows of troublesome regimes and issuing paranoid statements designed to shift the blame for Russia's ills away from itself.

Yakemenko is no outsider. He's one of the top officials in Nashi, the brother of its leader, and a member of the Public Chamber, a government oversight committee made up of presidential appointees. Nashi, the group he represents, is an explicitly counterrevolutionary body, formed by the Kremlin in 2005 in the wake of the so-called color revolutions in Georgia and Ukraine. In the West, those uprisings were viewed as two post-Soviet countries throwing off the remaining shackles of Russian influence. Inside the Kremlin, the color revolutions were seen as victories for Western spy agencies bent on bringing Russia to its knees.

"[At the time,] President Putin and other officials really used the rhetoric of 'the next day it'll happen in Moscow,'" said Masha Lipman, an analyst at the Carnegie Moscow Center. Nashi, which counts tens of thousands of Putin-loving youths as members, was designed to pre-empt that day.

But Nashi's representative wasn't the only one egging on autocratic dictators in the Arab world. As events in Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya unfolded, Russia's leaders remained uncomfortably quiet before responding with the same level of high-alert paranoia. Igor Sechin, a secretive deputy prime minister and one of Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's closest confidants, used a rare interview to blame the unrest entirely on Google, hinting at the role of Wael Ghonim, the Google executive who anonymously ran a Facebook page that gathered thousands of supporters for Egypt's revolution. "We need to more closely examine what has happened in Egypt," he told the Wall Street Journal. "See, well, what senior managers of Google have been doing in Egypt, what kind of manipulations of the energy of the people took place there."

Hours after the interview was published on Feb. 22, President Dmitry Medvedev made his first statements on the unrest, warning that "fanatics" were attempting to come to power in the Arab world. "This will mean fires for decades and the spread of extremism," he warned.

Most striking, however, was Medvedev's remark that an unidentified "they" were preparing similar unrest at home.

"They have prepared such a scenario for us before, and now more than ever they will try and realize it," Medvedev said, without making any attempt to elaborate on who "they" might be. "In any case, this scenario won't succeed."

Alexey SAZONOV/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: RUSSIA, EUROPE
 

Miriam Elder is a freelance journalist based in Moscow.

MALICEIT

1:40 AM ET

March 3, 2011

Well...

...biased article. Thank you.

 

NORBOOSE

4:25 PM ET

March 3, 2011

perhaps...

however, you do not debate the opinion's merit?

 

AR

1:49 AM ET

March 3, 2011

yashin and elder are both

yashin and elder are both agitators.

 

GEELWILMAN

5:14 AM ET

March 3, 2011

STOP

Stop lie that protesters bombing jets and stop write that tank attacks can be defended with bazookas!

You are fucking stupid journalists, stop to fuck our brains!

 

ANON45

12:00 PM ET

March 3, 2011

...

Once again in English good sir!

 

NORBOOSE

4:22 PM ET

March 3, 2011

When I read crap like this...

...I always wonder if someone actually thinks it, or if its someone of a contrary opinion trying to make their opponents look bad

 

GEELWILMAN

5:21 AM ET

March 3, 2011

n

for modern tank bazookas and spears do equal damage

where the destruction in Tripoli from the bombing?

 

GONZOV

7:11 AM ET

March 3, 2011

FP in Russia ain't easy.

The iron curtain of former soviet states that lays the belt isolating Russia within its own maze of borders. Inherited with ancient ethnic feudes creating constant tension.
From Karelen and Estonia, throughout the whole European border and further all the way throw Asia. Its an immense task to control(stabilize). Its true what they say about the corruption, though on the other hand this is just one way to label the status
of these transactions. Basically its communism still at work.
The finical system in between citizens have a tradition of trade that's embedded with their way of life. Same goes for largely any former communist state.
High ~corruption is always an issue, obviously.

Nashi seems too me be a desperate attempt to manufacture a shift in balance on the streets of Moscow. One have to be aware of various quite serious organization, such as the ultranationalists or neocon-leftist groups. They rally thousands upon the streets and lately with Domedovo tensions are growing.

 

THE GLOBALIZER

11:33 AM ET

March 3, 2011

Predictable reaction.

Communist dogma states that government is about the people. Communism does flatten the curve, but only by pushing down on the top.

Capitalism pushes up at the same point, exacerbating earnings differentials but also pulling up the entire curve.

Communism, particularly state economies, have the added bonus of being rife with corruption. Leaders use the communist structure to achieve capitalist ends, pulling their portion of the curve even higher.

Net effect? Same curve, but the capitalist tree bears considerably more fruit.

For the people, the emperor has no clothes. Russia rejected the communist ideology but retains many of its vestiges. Communism and statism result in less economic growth and opportunity than capitalism. In capitalism, the rich can get fantastically wealthy but it they're standing on the tip of a flagpole. In strong statist governments, the entire structure of the state organization exists to support the wealthy (ie. leadership).

Every statist nation around the world should be scared, because the economic stagnation + corruption combo is becoming clear to all citizens (at least, anyone with basic internet).

Rejecting the forces of grassroots democratic change is the classic playbook of statists, except that the statist governments in play have obvious evidence of being economically handicapped in the world, as compared to wealthy nations (US, EU) and growing nations (India, Brazil, Turkey). While there are some demographically-driven counterexamples (China, Vietnam) the vast majority of statist regimes are floundering.

The beauty of capitalist and generally democratic countries is that dissent is part of the daily discourse. Progressives argue with Tea Partiers, Tories argue with Labour, Christian Democrats argue with Socialists. These arguments fertilize the landscape, which statist regimes with secret police and restrained public debate only deplete their lands, which have grown barren.

Internet + long term economic trends = freedom's tipping point. Grab your bag of popcorn, it's only going to get better.

 

DREW ASHTON

4:36 PM ET

March 3, 2011

Russian reaction

Dr. Kruscheva has once sid Russia never changes. The most important change foreign reations today is people meeting all other peoples of the world on a daily basis. Remember, those of us in the Central Europe mindset for twenty years or more still hav Russia in our eyes. We belong to the region from Prague/Budapest to the Russian Far East. We are Americans, but we love that region. Myself, I live in the us.

 

KUMHO

5:25 AM ET

March 27, 2011

Thanks

biased article. Thank youparça kontör