Roman Ruins

How Muammar al-Qaddafi hoodwinked Italy for decades.

BY MAURIZIO MOLINARI | MARCH 3, 2011

View the visual history of Italy's failed African adventure.

In each of my three conversations with Col. Muammar al-Qaddafi throughout the 1990s, one theme prevailed: the Libyan leader's contempt for my country. Listening to his verbose condemnation of Italian colonialism was the price I paid to ask my own questions -- no matter the supposed topic of the interview. In one encounter, in the middle of the night under a tent in the Sirte desert, he bemoaned Libya's exploitation at Italian hands; at noon near the sand dunes just outside Tripoli, he blamed his country's troubles on Rome. Now, with his regime on edge, he is again blaming outsiders for Libya's ills. The protests, he said in a Feb. 22 address, were sparked by malevolent foreigners who were giving the demonstrators drugs. He accused the Italians -- along with the Americans -- of having delivered shoulder-launched rocket-propelled grenades to the rebel forces.

Given all this, you might find it odd -- as I still do -- that Qaddafi's closest European ally is, or was until very recently, none other than the Italian government. During his four decades of rule, the colonel managed to convince Italian leaders not only that their country owed Libya a historical debt, but that Rome couldn't do without Tripoli's help on everything from terrorism to immigration to oil. He extracted huge concessions from Rome and won huge economic windfalls for cronies including Farhat Bengdara, governor of the Central Bank of Libya, who became vice chairman of UniCredit, the biggest Italian bank, in 2009. Perhaps most significantly, he convinced Italy to be an evangelist for Libya's reintegration into the world community. The result is an absurdly asymmetrical relationship between the two countries; Qaddafi was always the winner.

At the beginning of his rule in 1969, Qaddafi's beef with Italy may have been justified. Like Britain and France elsewhere in Africa, Italy had occupied the country, sometimes brutally, beginning in 1911. After World War I, 30,000 Italian settlers were given farmland, taken away from local cultivators. When Benito Mussolini came to power in Italy, he ordered his forces to crush the fledgling Libyan resistance using any and all means. Untold numbers were killed, forced to migrate, or shoved into concentration camps. It wasn't until after World War II that Libya became independent again.

Libya was reborn in 1951 as a monarchy under King Idris, who was overthrown by the coup d'état that brought Qaddafi to power. A disciple of the anti-colonialism preached by Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser, Qaddafi found in Italy the perfect enemy. In 1970, less than a year after coming to power, he expelled every Italian living in the country -- more than 20,000 people -- and seized all their assets.

Qaddafi's hatred for Italy escalated into distaste for the entire West. He became a seemingly indiscriminate supporter of anti-Western militancy and terrorism. He funded and trained the Red Army Faction, the Red Brigades, and the Irish Republican Army. He also carried out his own attacks against targets such as Berlin's La Belle nightclub in 1986 and the Pan Am Flight 103 jumbo jet that exploded over Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988, killing 270 people.

Yet throughout this period, Italy-Libya relations remained solid -- even after the colonel dubbed a 1985 terrorist attack against the Rome airport that took the lives of 13 people a "heroic act," after he shot a Scud missile at the Italian island of Lampedusa as revenge for the U.S. bombing of Tripoli in 1986, and after he offered refuge in 1989 to Abdel Osama al-Zomar, the Palestinian terrorist sentenced to life for having been part of the 1982 attack against the Great Synagogue of Rome.

Yes, through it all, Italy found a way to work with Qaddafi. Its energy giant, Eni, began operating in Libya in 1956. Today the country supplies Italy with 22 percent of its oil and 10 percent of its gas -- some 28 percent of Libya's total exports. In 1998, Rome and Tripoli signed an agreement that committed Italy to paying reparations for colonialism, without any stipulations that Libya compensate Italians for the properties it seized in 1970. Then, beginning in 2000, Romano Prodi, then pre­si­dent of the European Commission, pus­hed Eu­ro­pe to re­start trade re­la­tions with Tri­po­li, which was under U.N. sanctions because of the Pan Am bombing. In 2004, he succeeded. Prodi received Qaddafi at the European Commission building in Brussels that April in the leader's first visit to Europe after 15 years.

It has always been clear who is in charge of the Italy-Libya relationship: The mo­re Qaddafi insulted I­ta­ly, the mo­re concessions he won from Ro­me. The colonel never wanted to build on the two countries' common past. What he was after was more tangible: hu­ge I­ta­lian in­vest­ments in Libyan in­fra­struc­tu­re pro­jects and permission to invest in the big­gest I­ta­lian bank as well as in many strategic pri­va­te com­pa­nies. This is to say nothing of oil, which Italian firms pump to the tune of 89 million barrels a year, decade after decade -- including during a U.N. trade embargo. Eni was the only major Western oil company to remain in the country -- a choice that was rewarded in 2007 when Eni entered into a giant, 10-year, $28 billion deal with Libya, which agreed to extend existing oil supply contracts through 2042 and natural gas ones through 2047. (Qaddafi allegedly received a significant cut of those sales' profit.)

How did Qaddafi so completely seduce Rome?

Franco Origlia/Getty Images)

 

Maurizio Molinari is the U.S. correspondent of La Stampa.

DIZZYFINGERS

11:47 AM ET

March 4, 2011

Gaddafi and Italy

"How Muammar al-Qaddafi hoodwinked Italy for decades"

Surely... surely this was a case of sociopaths (could have been any/every country on earth) recognizing each other and winking.

 

LAZESPUD

12:59 PM ET

March 4, 2011

Sourcing for Qaddafi funding and training RAF?

I found this a generally interesting and compelling article. It is pathetic how Italy bent over backwards to support this murderous madman. However the brief line about Qaddafi funding and training the Red Army Faction sticks out like a sore thumb.

The Red Army Faction was the notorious left-wing terror group that plagued Germany throughout the 1970s and 1980s. I know more than most people about this group (see my website www.baader-meinhof.com for more info). Qaddafi did not, to my knowledge, ever fund or train RAF members.

Following this link in this article takes you to another article on "the New American" which unearths the Soviet Spectre as the answer to all-thing Qaddafi. The problem is that the main source for this article appears to be Claire Sterling's much discredited and derided book of 1980 called "The Terror Network". This book's thesis was that all terrorism was essentially part of a global Soviet cabal. It was (mostly) bunk. It was filled with speculation presented as fact, apparently fed to Sterling by particularly rabid CIA case officers spinning theories. Ironically the book became (in)famous when CIA director used it as sourcing for himself when his own CIA offers presented a more muted assessment of global terrorism. Little did he know that much of it was essentially propaganda and speculation spread by his own case officers.

Regardless, since the fall of the Soviet Empire, much has been learned about this supposed Soviet hand in global terrorism; essentially it didn't exist. Ironically, (and most after the publication of the book) another communist govt., without the knowledge of the Soviets, harbored 11 Red Army Faction terrorists: the East Germans. But it wasn't part of some Grand Soviet Scheme.

At some point in the distant future there will be discussions about global foreign policy that don't ultimately dredge up the Soviet Spectre. What a glorious and informative discussion that will be.

 

THE GLOBALIZER

2:39 PM ET

March 4, 2011

Interesting article.

It does show the painful weakness of the Italian government internationally. It is a real shame, as Italians are a wonderful people, but they are incredibly inept at leveraging their considerable economy, and continually shirk what could be an influential role as one of the largest economies in the EU. (France, while a larger economy, far outstrips Italy in influence.)