Harvard for Tyrants

How Muammar al-Qaddafi taught a generation of bad guys.

BY DOUGLAS FARAH | MARCH 4, 2011

Col. Muammar al-Qaddafi is well known now for the abuses he has inflicted on his own people during more than four decades of brutal rule in Libya, but few remember the vast campaign of carnage and terrorism he orchestrated across West Africa and Europe when he was at the height of his powers.

Nor are his more recent alliance with Hugo Chávez of Venezuela and his long-standing relationship with Daniel Ortega of Nicaragua -- both of whom are busy trampling their constitutions and moving toward dictatorship -- well understood. And the fact that all three governments support the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), a terrorist group that produces more than half of the world's cocaine and two-thirds of the cocaine entering the United States, is usually ignored.

Ortega and Chávez are among the handful of leaders to publicly defend the Libyan leader's attacks on his own people and urge him to hang on for one last revolutionary battle. In 2004, Qaddafi awarded Chávez the al-Qaddafi International Prize for Human Rights, created by the Libyan dictator. Chávez, who in turn bestowed Venezuela's highest civilian honor on Qaddafi in 2009 while comparing him to South American liberator Simón Bolívar, has now offered publicly to mediate the Libyan conflict. Thus far, only Qaddafi has reportedly accepted the offer.

The ties that bind Qaddafi to some of the world's most repressive regimes and armed movements began in the 1980s, when he was regarded as one of the premier terrorist threats in the world. Flush with oil money, Qaddafi orchestrated a training campaign for those who became the most brutal warlords in much of Africa, a legacy that has left the region crippled and unstable today.

Qaddafi's World Revolutionary Center (WRC) near Benghazi became, as scholar Stephen Ellis noted in his classic 2001 book The Mask of Anarchy, the "Harvard and Yale of a whole generation of African revolutionaries," many of them the continent's most notorious tyrants. There, recruits from different countries were hosted in camps in the desert and given training in weapons and intelligence techniques, with some doses of ideological training based on Qaddafi's Green Book. Courses lasted from a few weeks to more than a year, depending on the level of specialization and rank one had.

In addition to the African contingents, Qaddafi's cadres trained the Sandinistas from Nicaragua, along with other Latin American revolutionary movements, and in the process developed an enduring relationship with Ortega. Later Qaddafi developed a close and ongoing relationship with the FARC, becoming acquainted with its leaders in meetings of revolutionary groups regularly hosted in Libya.

At the WRC in the 1980s and 1990s, a select group of the students, drawn from the broader group of attendees, formed a fraternity of despots who provided mutual support in their bloody and ruthless campaigns for power and wealth. That durable network still wields considerable influence today through its alumni still in power, including Blaise Compaoré of Burkina Faso and Idriss Déby of Chad.

The one thing that held these disparate thugs together was their broad anti-American agenda, which led Qaddafi to support other dictators. Qaddafi's closest ally in the region was murderous Robert Mugabe, who although he is not a WRC alumnus, has been propped up by direct Libyan donations and subsidized oil shipments, primarily hundreds of millions of dollars in oil shipments. Relations between the two countries have been more strained in recent days when Zimbabwe could not repay its Libyan debt.

Qaddafi seems to have made out well in his investments. After he intervened militarily in the Central African Republic in 2001, the president he protected, Ange-Félix Patassé, signed a deal giving Libya a 99-year lease to exploit all of that country's natural resources, including uranium, copper, diamonds, and oil. In Zimbabwe, Qaddafi acquired at least 20 luxurious properties after riding to Mugabe's rescue; he also got a stake in some of the few still-viable state enterprises.

But West Africa bore the brunt of Qaddafi's early ambitions. Liberia, the U.S. stronghold in West Africa in the Cold War, was of particular interest to Qaddafi, especially after President Ronald Reagan ordered a bombing attack in 1986 against Libya that killed one of his daughters.

HO/AFP/Getty Images

 

Douglas Farah, a former Washington Post correspondent who covered Libya's activities in West Africa, is a senior fellow at the International Assessment and Strategy Center in Alexandria, Virginia.

000ACE000

1:15 AM ET

March 5, 2011

S/P

al-Qaddafi International Prize --> spelled as "internatioanal"

 

P.J. AROON

5:48 PM ET

March 5, 2011

Corrected

Thanks for pointing out the typo.

--FP copy chief

 

SAM FROM CALIFORNIA

3:39 AM ET

March 5, 2011

Back to hypocrisy.

Savimbi, Pinochet, Mobutu, Noriega, Bazner, Somoza, heck the entire "School of the Americas" crowd ... so Gaddafi supported some rotten tyrants around the world, it's not like America didn't back some crap leaders and ruthless thugs.

Take his support for Daniel Ortega. So Danny Ortega was not a nice guy, but was he as bad as the thug that the US had in as a puppet? Morally speaking, Gaddhafi was on the right side of history to support the FSLN against Somoza, since Somoza's human rights abuses were that much more extreme.

It is more than appropriate to criticize Gaddafi for being a thug who murders his own people. But criticizing him for backing foreign dictators just begs the question-why was the US backing people who were equally violent and sinister at the same time?

 

REUBEN HINTZ

9:03 PM ET

March 6, 2011

So...

So two wrongs make a right?

Because the US supported bad guys no American journalist can ever write about other people doing it?

 

VERITAS123

12:15 AM ET

March 7, 2011

Too True

Just because the U.S. did it (which I am not proud of) doesn't mean a journalist can't criticize other nations

 

D.D

12:07 PM ET

March 7, 2011

Thats the beauty of being a

Thats the beauty of being a journalist, you can share, inform and transmit information, foras long as it is accurate and unbiased...
I am grateful for the article, but lets all have a 'mea culpa' moment please:
Firstly lets recognize that the only reason why you are writting about Qadaffi and we are reading it, is because of the Libyan people. They are the ones fighting '...in the trenches..", WE, the rest of the 'morally sound' and 'tyrant free' world; for reasons of financial gains or cowardness, we were 'friends' of Qaddafi! At least, we were friends until his people started hating him! Lets remember that not so long ago we invited Qadaffi (his children and all his so called 'scholars' for that matter) to our hostels of democracy; to the creme de la creme of our institutions and rooms of power, we rolled out the red carpet for him (heck even raised tents for him!), sent envoys and lobbyists to 'sway his ego'. The Libyan people probably saw less of him than many of our 'non tyrant' of leaders. The 'hallway' cowards, those that were easily corrputed by chump change, the African Nations leaders, we cannot hate, for they have always been cowards and lets face it, they are more viscious of tyrants and thugs than Qaddafi! The number of African presidents and of meetings they were afraid to attend to, just in fear of having to vote 'against' Qaddafi and 'for' the 'right thing' is too shameful to count! Case in point though all of our African leaders didnt like Qaddafi they nominated him as the African candidate for chairman of the U.N. Human Rights Commission in 2002! No, it's no joke, maybe Qaddafi is the among the most 'potent' of our leaders... as far as Human Rights goes!

For us, watching CNN, now, today, Qaddafi is a tyrant, yesterday he was a 'friend'-
Why don't we question ourselves on that: When the rest of the world is too scared or weak to speak against the ills of the world, we cannot be solely 'self interest driven' and close our eyes to what does not serve our agenda.) Qaddafi's so called 'school of thugs' might not have had students from American, British, Chinese, German government leadership bodies, but I am certain these same high ranking officials of these same nationalities were on the 'Board of trustees' of his 'school'.
(FYI:Just as he was a military student in the UK and in Greece, we are really too quick to make the analogy that these so called 'schools' were Al Qaeda training camps...)
In the 1980's when Qaddafi was named "...premier terrorist threat in the world", the same people that 'branded him so, have 'de-branded him, re-branded him and now call to the 'International Community to being sanctions against this 'dylusiona, unfit ruler'.
Lets point the finger at them, lets judge them, and lets make sure we dont sit outside like hygenas waiting for the winner of the battle to come out and praise them, then run inside and finish off the fallen with our cheap punches, (after having checked his pulse to make sure he really is dead)-
Then lets question our 'policing' of ruthless dictators and tyrants, to make sure the peoples do not die, that the peoples do not have to martyr themselves for the rest of the world to pay attention and do something about it. Because really, the Libyan people, should march into Developed Nations' government offices and demand for answers, (and their money back). If we are being honest with ourselves and say what we did in Libya:

Since the late 90's the Developed Nations of this world, starting with with the most developed (uhmm uhmm...) were sprinting to Libya for it's: "...natural resources, strong intelligence assets in one of the most volatile parts of the Arab world and a shared interest in neutralizing Al Qaeda, its loyalists, and its emulators." Mr. Joseph Kirschke wrote in an article in worldpress, he goes on to say:
"...with proven reserves one-sixth the size of Saudi Arabia's, enhanced access to Libyan oil markets, some have suggested, could be the antidote America needs to curtail at least partly its energy dependence on the country that produced 15 of the 19 Sept. 11 hijackers."
In that same article, he quotes:
"Libya needs to understand that the way forward must finally and fully account for the past," from Mr. Biden, who was then an 'active' chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
And such accountablitity was simply paying the families of the victims of the Lockerbie tragedy. So, that the American Peoples will not stand in the way of the American Government doing 'business' with Libya.
Once the remaining balance was settled to the Families of the Lockerbie Victims, the Americans, the European Union started 'pumping in money' into Libya; in so called 'Development Aid' 'Investments in Oil and Natural Gas' and my top three favorites: 1. Military Hardware, 2.Nuclear Power and last but not least 3. Debt Forgiveness!

So, the moral of all of this is; once a tyrant/and or dictator, from a country rich in natural reserves and/or oil, has a change of heart, after murdering people of developed countries (his own people....well, our hands are kinda tied....and really its kind of an 'internal' matter, so they should handle it 'internally'!) then we would love to do 'business' with him, we would love to 'not see all the flaws of the man and his wrong doings to his people.
And though when we were excavating the peoples internal resources, we really dont ask the people we ask the mad tyrant, dictator at the top! (Ironically,the first thing we do is 'freeze his assets' in our banks!)

In that same article, Mr. Joseph Kirschke, says:
A Libya expert at the Middle East Institute and a former translator for the United States Ambassador to Tripoli said four years ago, "...We wanted to show you can have a rogue nation—a supporter of terrorism with weapons of mass destruction—coming in from the cold to our side"
So, the 'nation' was rogue? The people of Libya were the rogue ones, and thank Goodness for Qadaffi for 'allowing' his rogue nation to be 'touched' by the hand of 'Democracy and Righteousness! (More like the hand of Hyprocrisy and Capitalism!)
So, I ask the questions: Is he or Is he not your 'business' partner, didn't you let him in from the cold?. Was he or was he not always rogue? Why did you let him in from the cold, and arm him? and now that he uses these weapons against his people, and you call him a 'dilusional man, what will you do to save these people?.
The shame really is on the developed mind, for the least developed one, had nothing to do with making the man or arming the 'dylusional man'.

There are some comments in your article that I must call out Foul to:
1. Qaddafi's "training campaign, courses in the desert...."- Can you cite a source that will corroborate that? Its sounding eerie, like the "WMD moblie storage trucks"
2. Calling Mr. Compaore a 'disparate thug' yes, he is and yes you can call him that, but "... with broad anti-American agenda.." that does nothing but take away your credibility as a 'journalist'. Dont get me wrong, I can't stand the man, I hate what he has done to my people and my country, (if I could run to the State Dept. and 'accuse him of making weapons of mass destruction so the American government can 'deal' with him I would!)
But an 'Anti American Agenda'? Really? prove it.
If there is one side of the world this 'neigborhood thug/mercenary supplier' does not care much of is exactly that side of the world, America!
My opinion is that he knows he is a thug, he is friends with thugs and he has done nothing but stir up horrible wars in the region, so he was never foolish enough to think that he would get a visa let alone a picture session at the White House! His first and only visit to the White House was in 2008! He was so happy to finally get in there that he gave the American Ambassador to Burkina, (the man that made his trip possible) the highest distinction in the country! So he is alot of things, but a man with an 'Anti-American Agenda', please dont go there. I like you, I don't like him, but above you all I love the truth! (That's how people get people thinking that people have WMDs and poor people die everyday for years and years!!...uhm uhm...)
3. I love the American in you, when you claim that I quote "..The Che could not work with Kabila because the Che thought Kabila was an 'incompetent leader' and 'corrupt' and you go on to say.. "Relations with Kabila's son Joseph, the current DRC President, are not as close".. are not as close with whom??? The Che'? Please don't leave room for the 'simple, simple minded to make up stories' (YES, I am saying there are people out there crazy enough to think and say the following "The man is so bad, even the Che won't work with him!!)

3. Lets not forget that Libya has even been hosting talks aimed at resolving the crisis in Darfur. Yes, there is only one Libya in the world, and yes, WE as nations all sat around this dylusional man's table and tried to come up with a solution to a 'Dictator, Tyrant, who has killed his people and whom we would LOVE to see at the International Court of Justice!" So, lets take a minute and ponder on that.

Lastly, when Chavez said "..What Simon Bolivar is to the Venezuelan People, Qaddafi is to the Libyan People.." It's not that crazy: Bolivar's family wealth helped him gain power, Qaddafi's family was his country, and the country's wealth was his wealth! (no one objected that til now). He gained power thanks to that control. Mr. Bolivar and Mr. Qaddafi were both very inclined to a lifetime of governance. And though yes, the two men were very different in essence and 'raison d'etre', why couldnt Chavez say that? and why would it be erroneous?
We, the peoples of all Developed Nations clearly thought Qaddafi was a 'lucid, democratic and worthy leader, when we "...let him in from the cold".
Who knows, someday, we might even be letting Chavez in from the 'cold'!
So, lets write about the Brothels of Tyrants and Dictators, and how we all, for a certain resource and/or money, we all have a price tag. How we can all close our eyes to 'corrupt/illegal/unethical/un-democratic' doings, if we get compensated! And like a bunch of 'workers' in a brothel, when we get our money and go back to our rooms and gossip about how bad he pays or how he isn't that good after all!
The point is in this game called Democracy, we should all be priceless!!!!

 

JUAN67

9:11 PM ET

March 6, 2011

His daughter is not dead

"Ronald Reagan ordered a bombing attack in
1986 against Libya that killed one of his daughters"

That daughter is not dead and her name is Hana and she is 26, the claim was only an attempt to gain sympathy and support against the Us attack , he used her as a propaganda tool.

 

XTIANGODLOKI

11:43 AM ET

March 7, 2011

So what?

What is the US to do? Get involved in Libya's civil war and choose a side? From a historical perspective it will only make matters worse.

Why is it that before these journalists and their articles never pop up BEFORE it became popular to bash mubarak and qidaffy, you know when they were our allies?

 

RALPH E.

1:42 AM ET

March 9, 2011

GADDAFI'S NUCLEAR CAPACITY

Snake Hunter Sez,

Once Upon A Time...Col. Gaddafi had a nuke factory, & Good Old Uncle Sam
said to him, "Al Ga.daffy, You are a Bad, bad Boy...playing with those nasty toys! So, Uncle Sam took them away, and hid them in a safe place, underground.

And that's the rest of the story. - reb
___ ___

 

JPSCHOLTEN

2:45 PM ET

March 21, 2011

Why another Harvard?

Surely Harvard is the Harvard for tyrants. The school has a long and distinguished history of producing corrupt leaders with blood on their hands in foreign countries, from Kissinger to Bush. If Gaddafi coughed up the cash I'm sure Harvard would be delighted to welcome his children and his cronies into its classrooms