There Will Be No Uprising in Saudi Arabia

Contrary to what you might have heard, the kingdom is hardly ripe for revolution.

BY NAWAF OBAID | MARCH 10, 2011

The past few months have seen unprecedented turbulence in the Middle East. Leaders in Tunisia and Egypt have been forced from power by popular uprisings, Libya is careening toward civil war, and widespread unrest has rattled Bahrain, Yemen, Iraq, Iran -- and to a lesser extent, Jordan, Algeria, Oman, and other countries in the region. Yet at the geographic center of all this chaos is Saudi Arabia, a country untouched by turmoil. This fact has led some pundits to the conclusion that the kingdom has only temporarily muffled the latent discontent of its people and that ultimately the domino of dissatisfaction and regime change will fall in Riyadh. These analysts, however, are highly likely to be proved wrong, as they fundamentally misunderstand the unique strengths of the Saudi monarchy and the current system of governance.

What their assessments fail to take into account is that though the kingdom shares several characteristics with the Middle Eastern countries listed above, it has a number of features that render it exceptional. Saudi Arabia is not ripe for revolution. Not even close.

Unlike many of the regional governments currently facing unrest, the kingdom has a strong record of fiscal responsibility. Revenues from energy exports and the more than $500 billion in foreign reserves (the third-largest in the world) amassed during King Abdullah's rule have been tapped to fund development projects that benefit the kingdom's surging population. In fact, the Saudi government has spent tens of billions in the last several years alone to build universities, schools, hospitals, rail links, and housing developments. King Abdullah recently announced a financial amelioration package, which had been in development since December 2010, to coincide with his return from abroad. These include $29.5 billion in extra expenditures that will benefit the poor, aid the unemployed, provide housing assistance, and support a real estate fund and bank of credit. Another program will raise the salaries of public employees and military personnel and give part-time public-sector employees full employment and benefits. Another aims to help those impacted by inflation. All these programs will be augmented by a further series of initiatives that will be announced later this year and included in the 2012 budget, with a focus on social security, unemployment, and housing. It is precisely these types of programs that were lacking in those countries that have witnessed revolution or are now facing unrest.

In addition to its social spending, the kingdom has invested extensively to shore up the defenses of its energy infrastructure, including several billion dollars for its 35,000-strong Facilities Security Force, and has spent a similar amount on its various armed services to protect its borders. Finally, the Saudi government has made considerable investments in internal security to root out al Qaeda from the kingdom; domestic safety and stability have been a key pillar of support from the general population.

Of course, the kingdom is not immune to economic problems. Greater efforts at fighting poverty and youth unemployment, as well as investing in infrastructure and public services, are still drastically needed. All Saudis receive housing assistance and free health care and education; the kingdom has a GDP per capita of about $18,500; and relatively few live in extreme poverty. Nonetheless, there is a widespread acknowledgement that the standard of living is not commensurate with a country as resource rich as Saudi Arabia. For this reason, the leadership has undertaken various economic reforms. A plan is in development to raise the minimum salary for civil servants to about $1,500 per month. The bureaucracy is being streamlined to improve the delivery of health care and other services. And several years ago, the government launched an office with the mandate of reducing the number who live under the poverty level ($1,015 per month) from 13.3 percent in 2010 to 2.2 percent in 2020. Another initiative will successfully reduce to zero the 1.63 percent of Saudis living in "extreme poverty" (less than $450 per month) by the end of this year. Compared with the world poverty line of $1.25 per day, the kingdom is doing very well. But because Saudi Arabia is no ordinary country, such numbers are an embarrassment and have been met with large-scale government action.

Although there are some cultural similarities between Saudi Arabia and some of the states that are currently experiencing unrest, the dissimilarities are more important. First, no Arab country possesses a culture so rooted in change-resistant conservatism, which is in many ways derived from the kingdom's unique role in Islam and the Arab world. Not only is it the birthplace of the Prophet Mohammed and the home of the holy cities of Mecca and Medina, but it is also the largest provider of Muslim charitable contributions worldwide. And the fact that the Saudi monarchy has acted as a responsible custodian of the two holy sites gives it enormous legitimacy, both at home and abroad.

FAYEZ NURELDINE/AFP/Getty Images

 

Nawaf Obaid is a senior fellow at the King Faisal Center for Research and Islamic Studies and is pursuing a doctorate on the rise of Saudi nationalism at the department of war studies at King's College London.
A shorter version of this article was published in the Washington Post on March 11.

Facebook|Twitter|Reddit

OLIVER CHETTLE

10:17 PM ET

March 10, 2011

For all I know the case put

For all I know the case put forward here may be a strong one, in which case commissioning an article from someone who is effectively on the Saudi royal family's payroll is not a good way for your magazine to present that case.

 

ARABIAN KNIGHTS

10:57 PM ET

March 10, 2011

For all you know....

it seems that anything bad, has to be true- anything good ever said about a Middle East country, has to be by 'someone on the payroll of the royal family'......

 

AHSON HASAN

11:32 PM ET

March 10, 2011

Overwhelming over-optimism...

The over-whelming optimism expressed in this article sticks crazy! If not on the Saudi payroll, the author certainly has been showered by riches from the Arabs in some way or the other. The House of Saud is the worst possible offender of human rights and yet it gets away with it because of the oil money. One would dearly like to see these royal unceremoniously kicked of their palaces in the desert heat by a people's revolution.

And, give me a break Foreign Policy - stop writing positive stuff about these atrocious Arabs! You know and we understand that giving a twist is never going enhance their image or your reputation.

 

ARABIAN KNIGHTS

11:06 PM ET

March 10, 2011

Stability in the ME is in the interst of the US.....

It will be nice to see at least one of the 'strong' countries in the ME maintain stability, which is in the interest of the US (something the White House forgot), which will in tern limit the Iranian influence, keep oil prices down, and maintain some kind of relative peace with Israel.
This administration seems to forget that Al-Qaida thrives in chaos- the more of it, the more Al-Qaida will grow. They also forgot, that even after killing thousands of Americans and spending billions, Bin Ladin is still in his cave safe and sound, along with his fellow terrorists, just waiting for something exactly like what is going on now to go down. But this might require a higher level of thinking than anyone in our government is capable of these days...
It is in the US's benefit to let the Arab countries deal with their problems on their own, without the orders and statements from us, in order to keep gas from sky rocketing, and having the same type demonstrations in this country... These are mostly food riots or sectarian riots (fueled by Iran) - one can reshuffle the governments all they want, but at the end of the road, poor Arab countries cant afford to feed their people... it is important to remember that none of this is about 'democracy'- it is about food prices.....

 

JJH722

12:01 AM ET

March 11, 2011

this guy is a joke--he's a

this guy is a joke--he's a paid lackey. if the saudis have really been fostering a sense of nationalism, it is only because their people are so pissed that they operate as an american client state. nationalism isn't a good thing for backwards monarchies. a "nation" is a visceral idea more powerful than, and independent from, the kinetic power of the state. the saudis are the state. not the nation. the only reason i can see for the saudis not having momentous unrest is that it is likely to derive, at first, from the minorty shiite in the east. if the saudis can rally their majority, then divide and conquer will be the default strategy. FP should stop giving lobbyists soapboxes.

 

MGHULOUM

12:21 AM ET

March 11, 2011

Yes, Virginia (or Hassa), there is a Utopia

Wow! So there is a utopia after all. Headed by the 5000 or is it 6000 al-Saud, where everything is orderly, even the gross corruption. Everything is love and peace and justice. Even the lurking prince Bandar Bin Sultan and his rumored plots (no mention here of the US$ 2 billion from BAE Systems). Ain't gonna happen: probably not. But it all depends on the time frame.

 

FIRASAYYAD

12:51 AM ET

March 11, 2011

It may not be ripe now..

The author's correct. SA is not ripe for revolution. However, you cannot argue it is as stable as a western democracy, like German or Sweden, for example. The fact that there are gross violations of women's rights, absolutely no democracy or say-so in political affairs, and 30% unemployment for those under 30 means that the threat is always there, and any time, there could be a revolution. So long as princes drive around in diamond-studded Benzes, there will be those, who rightfully so, will want to overthrow the entire system that allows such.

 

KEVINSD

12:57 AM ET

March 11, 2011

You think?

Surely anyone who thought differently wouldn't have a job at the King Faisal Center For Research and Islamic Studies.

 

AVILLA

1:06 AM ET

March 11, 2011

Ridiculous propaganda.

Yes, Saudi Arabia is a wonderful country, with equal rights for all. A true world leader for gender equality, religious freedom, poverty elimination, and sane criminal laws. We should all look up to the country and its benevolent patrons, the Al Sauds, who (as you can see in the picture) rule the land with a gentle smile and... unique... beards.

 

HOKIEMAN78

9:32 AM ET

March 11, 2011

This would be funny if it wasn't so sad

This article would be funny if it wasn't so sad. I spent two years living and working in Saudi Arabia 30 years ago, and the main thing that strikes me about the country and its culture today is how little it has actually progressed in those decades on its supposed march to progress. It becomes very easy for folks to mistake the construction of infrastructure and the spreading of wealth for the actual development and evolution of a modern society. And one thing Saudi is most definitely not is a modern society.

Compared to my time there, the genie is out of the bottle in regards to mass communication and exposure to outside influence and thought. While I agree with the author that SA is unlikely to undergo an Egypt-style revolt in the short-term, eventually the inherent incompatibilities of a theologically-derived absolute monarchy operating under a capitalist economic model will cause an inevitable fracture of the previously insular Saudi culture sometime in the future. I've waited for it to happen all these many years, and I now believe it will not take another 30 years to occur.

 

ORPAHN

10:40 AM ET

March 11, 2011

please ...!

It is principally to FP’s created to present both sides. But this article, please … I mean it is an insult to your readers to publish this kind of propaganda. Even the Weekly Standard knows better; change is coming!

 

INSIGHTABLE

12:20 PM ET

March 11, 2011

I'm relieved to see that

I'm relieved to see that readers of this article have more insight into the issues than the writer himself pretends to not have. No mention of a dysfunctional judicial system, political prisoners incarcerated without trial. No mention of gross disparity between the super wealthy and the poor, who are expected to be greatful working for a " minimum wage" of $450 per month, no mention of even poorer foreign workers employed for less than $100 per month. No mention of a total lack of participation in government, nor the possibilty to organize politically, nor to demonstrate peacefully. No mention of gross corruption, nor of this being the only country in the world which does not allow women to even drive. No mention of all of the other issues pertaining to women... This article is not only an insult to your readers. It's an insult to Saudis who have a dream of progress.

 

KARENYKARL

12:48 PM ET

March 11, 2011

The author certainly presents the best case for status quo.

As with other establishmentarian views, I think it tends to stick inside the bubble a bit too much. It's hard to get a true feeling for the tenor of the country when everyone you talk to has the first name of Prince, and speaks perfect English.

My understanding is that Saudi Arabia is riven by huge disparities in income, political power and participation, religious outlook, and sympathy towards the regime. 52% of the population is under 25. 45% of the males in the under 25 age cohort are unemployed, as are more than 90% of females, 10% of the population is Shiite, putting it in the oppressed minority status. And the western secularist slant of many of the young is in direct conflict with the Safalists and Wahhabis.

For a more detailed counterargument, go to old new lefty's blog on Open Salon.

 

HURRICANEWARNING

2:11 PM ET

March 11, 2011

All I know is that I feel for

All I know is that I feel for the people of Saudi Arabia. I wish they could have the government that they deserve. BUT, unfortunately, the world needs oil, and thus, we need Saudi Arabia to be nice and stable. I also suppose that most of this unrest (in the Shia areas) is being directly influenced/ caused by Iran, who no doubt sees this as a great opportunity.

 

CATARINAALEXON

2:51 PM ET

March 12, 2011

Good analysis.

Have lived and worked with international relations in Riyadh and agree completely with Nawaf Obaid's analysis.

And people should remember that it's in the interest of the world to keep Saudi Arabia stable and prosperous. There has been too much Saudi bashing since 9/11 based on prejudice.

 

MAIGARI

4:08 AM ET

March 20, 2011

UPRISING

There will be no uprising so long as the democratic nations of Unites States of America andher allies want the oil dollars fo their economy. At present, the Saudi police is hopelessly bound to the wishes of the king and any attempt to raise a voice for freedom of association and democracy will be ruthleely crushed and there not be a whimper rom the West. Oil and the oil revenue is far more important to the U.S. and her allies is far more important than freedom. The Libyans , Tunbisians and Egyptians sre simply lucky that they are not so vital as the heriditary rulers of the gulf. Today the West id spending millions "to protect Libyan civilianbs" but Sanaa, Riyadh, and Manam are mauling thier own civilians and all we hear and see is frown followed by a wink - contunue the good works your majesty- those pesky human rights people don't understand how lucky they are to have You.