What Happens During a Nuclear Meltdown?

Not what's happening in Japan.

BY JOSHUA E. KEATING | MARCH 14, 2011

Technicians are scrambling to contain the damage after March 11's devastating earthquake and tsunami knocked out power at Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant. Seawater is being flooded into the reactor core to prevent overheating, and radioactive gas is being periodically vented to prevent pressure from building up. But these are merely stopgap measures to prevent a full meltdown of the reactor core. How likely is it that this strategy will fail and Japan will face a total meltdown?

At the moment, not very. It's an inexact term, but "meltdown" generally refers to the complete melting of a plant's nuclear fuel rods. These rods are about half an inch in diameter and 12 feet long and are surrounded by a zirconium covering called cladding. To prevent overheating, water is constantly circulated through the reactor. When the cooling system fails, the rods, made of a ceramic material, can melt. The melted nuclear material drips down and accumulates, possibly penetrating the core.

In the case of the Fukushima plant, it is believed that the top 2 to 3 feet of the rods were exposed after the power went out, causing them to overheat. The vessel containing the nuclear core has not been penetrated. Nuclear engineers prefer the term "partial melting" for events of this type.

The good news is that the plant is not currently operating, meaning that the fuel is only producing about 6 percent of the heat normally generated when it's up and running. During the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, the plant was still running during a power surge that essentially turned the plant's reactor core into a small nuclear bomb, pushing actual radioactive material -- as opposed to gas with trace radioactive elements -- out into the air.

The bad news is that without power, the plant's technicians can't resume the normal circulation of water through the core to cool down the rods.

The controlled venting of steam from the reactor -- while necessary to prevent overheating -- is also problematic. Inside the core, the steam reacts with the protective zirconium casing surrounding the rods, creating hydrogen. When this hydrogen is vented out and interacts with oxygen, it can cause explosions like those that occurred at the plant on March 12 and 14. The steam also contains cesium and iodine -- radioactive elements that are dangerous to human health. The level of radioactivity around the plant, while relatively modest, is still twice what the Japanese government considers safe. This venting process could potentially continue for several months.

The most severe instance of partial melting in history occurred at the Three Mile Island plant near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, in 1979. The melting was caused when a pump pushing water into the reactor core failed for unknown reasons. Nuclear specialists say that the melting at Fukushima Daiichi may release more radioactivity than that incident. However, a disaster on the scale of Chernobyl, which left hundreds of square miles uninhabitable for years, is believed to be nearly impossible because of improved containment facilities at modern nuclear plants.

Thanks to Mujid Kazimi, director of the Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and John Lee, professor of nuclear engineering and radiological sciences at the University of Michigan.

STR/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS:
 

Joshua E. Keating is an associate editor at Foreign Policy.

SARGAM

12:24 AM ET

March 18, 2011

typical establishment condescension

A) Are all the reactors actually shut down? That's not clear. All 3 reactors that were running - and lost power so they could not shut down? - blew their tops.

B) "However, a disaster on the scale of Chernobyl is believed to be nearly impossible because of improved containment facilities at modern nuclear plants."

What about the spent fuel storage pools, which contain MORE fuel than the reactors. At least one was reported completely dry. They basically do not have any containment.

IS FP another gvmnt mouthpiece?

 

DALLAS WEAVER

4:09 PM ET

March 18, 2011

Understanding the basics

You need to learn the basics about reactors and their design details before you comment, unless you believe that unsupported beliefs are more relevant than reality. There are significant differences between a boiling water reactor and a graphite moderated reactor (Chernobyl).

Yes, they are shut down. The heat is from decay of short lived radioactive products. Spent fuel that has been sitting around a long time doesn't put out as much heat, which puts the spent fuel in different categories depending upon it's age.

 

VICENTEP

9:09 PM ET

March 18, 2011

What about the blow up

For as long as its being said the reactor number 4 protective case is blown.

Have you seen the footage, the build is looking like Chernobyl. I know the design is completely different, but if they don`t manage to cool down the core, a melt down can cause a leak towards the protective bed, witch is not certain to hold.

I'm much worried about the leaking of this radiative material to the ocean, where it can be spread with easy and with out control.

 

HAGELADUKI

11:50 PM ET

March 26, 2011

It is a disaster

I think this is a disaster on the scale of Chernobyl, but the result is even worse that Chernobyl.

There are much dangerous nuclear stuff is poured into the sea, the damage of these will hurt most countries in Asia. I guess many people there will have pain in left side.

What's more, official health departments in Asia already detected there are some nuclear things in their seafood. God Bless Us!