Japan's Black Swan

The earthquake changed everything. What will Tokyo do next?

BY ROBERT MADSEN, RICHARD J. SAMUELS | MARCH 16, 2011

Observers of world affairs often speak of "unimaginable" events, developments which like the end of the Cold War, the 2008-2009 global financial crisis, or the recent Arab revolutions prove stunning not so much because they are illogical but rather because they fall outside the normal range of experience and prediction. The surprise, in other words, arises from a failure of human imagination. Japan's recent disaster fits this pattern. In hindsight there was only a single "black swan" anomaly: the 9.0 earthquake. That such an event, once it had happened, would trigger an enormous tsunami was surely predictable, as was the impact on nuclear facilities that were designed to withstand only more limited shocks and the sickening human and social devastation that would ensue. The political, economic, and strategic implications of the continuing disaster are likewise more foreseeable than was the disaster itself.

Political Implications

The immediate effect of the Japanese catastrophe has been to give new life to a government that was on the verge of collapse. The ruling Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) rose to power in the autumn of 2009 with a strong electoral mandate, ousting a Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) that had long maintained a stranglehold on the Japanese political system. Soon, however, the DPJ's mistakes in managing alliance negotiations with the United States, maritime quarrels with China, and feckless economic policies sent the party's approval ratings spiraling downward. After a series of scandals within the upper reaches of the DPJ as well as the government's failure to pass in a timely fashion the enabling legislation necessary to effectuate the budget for fiscal 2011 (which begins in two weeks), Prime Minister Naoto Kan appeared doomed. The situation was so bad that the prestigious Nihon Keizai Shimbun openly queried whether he -- and perhaps even his ruling DPJ -- could survive through the end of March.

The current crisis has given the prime minister a second chance. With thousands of confirmed deaths, some 15,000 persons missing, hundreds of thousands displaced, and several nuclear reactors on the brink of meltdown, this is no time for a change of government. Kan has made reasonably good use of this "rally round the flag" moment, establishing a national crisis management center and dispatching ministers and other staff to deal with various problems. It is still too early to say that he has done enough, but he seems to have improved upon his predecessors' performance after the Kobe Earthquake that took more than 6,000 lives in 1995. Rather than proudly rejecting offers of foreign assistance, for example, Kan quickly accepted all offers of aid, mobilized the military for rescue operations, and appeared frequently on television to calm a nervous public.

Due both to the magnitude of the disaster and to Kan's relatively firm leadership, the opposition has likewise adjusted its position, edging toward a more conciliatory stance on several major issues. Sadakazu Tanigaki, the head of the LDP, and other opposition leaders have thus declared their desire to work together in the formulation and passage of an emergency spending package. The ambit of this new cooperation will probably expand to include the regular budget as well, enabling Kan to obtain Diet approval for the aforementioned enabling legislation. Kan and his party may therefore succeed in gaining several more months of time in which to rebuild their reputation and power -- assuming, naturally, that the trouble at the Fukushima nuclear facility ends without producing yet another catastrophe. But with that caveat, this second opportunity, is for the DPJ, the silver lining on a very dark cloud.

AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: DISASTERS, JAPAN
 

Robert Madsen is a senior fellow at the Center for International Studies at MIT, a member of the executive council at Unison Capital, and an advisor to several international investment groups.

Richard J. Samuels is Ford International professor of political science and director of the Center for International Studies at MIT. His latest book is Securing Japan: Tokyo's Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia

ASAD KHAN

12:17 AM ET

March 16, 2011

politics.

in a national crisis like this talk of change of government would be inappropriate.Soon however the nation will be called upon to rebuild itself.At such a time the formation of a national government would be a feasible option.

 

ODYSSEY8

3:19 PM ET

March 16, 2011

Maybe not feasible at present, but change will be coming!

I do agree that at the present time, regime change in Japan is not feasible. The emphasis at this point must be to do everything possible to save as many of the people of Japan as possible.

However, assuming that there is not another major catastrophic event involving the ill-fated nuclear power plant, and the entire country is not irradiated to the point of making all of Japan uninhabitable, change will be coming! Many of Japan's citizens are becoming more and more angry over what has happened to their people and their country, and rightfully so!

The Japanese government sold out its citizens and its ecology in the name of profit. Then, it all went to hell, and the reaction of the government has been essentially hear no evil, see no evil, and in particular speak no evil, to the further detriment of Japan's citizenry.

The time may not be right now, but a time will come when the Japanese government will have much to answer for what they have done to their country and their people, and they must be held to account!

 

DR. SARDONICUS

8:43 PM ET

March 16, 2011

Forget Uranium/Plutonium and coal, think Thorium

People of the very best kind keep nattering on and on about how nuclear and coal power are the only “realistic” alternatives to petroleum: the only ones the gigabuck petroleum cartel and its political/media appendages have allowed to be discussed and thoroughly researched. Alternative energy research has been sabotaged for fifty years. No wonder we don’t have viable alternatives.

We have solar, hydro, recycled trash, biofuels (yuck!) hydrothermal and wind power, whose stunted research and development are nonetheless coming up with more and more promising user efficiencies. They will serve as stopgaps.

In addition, there is the theoretical alternative of Thorium reactors: much cleaner, cheaper, safer and more secure (on paper, working models were never permitted) than Uranium variants. Those were first selected and have been rammed through ever since, BECAUSE of their weapon applications. Against the historical record of uranium safety (one of the first reactor piles fried one of its physicists) plain common sense and Lloyds of London number crunching. People thought they needed thirty thousand ICBMs, for some insane reason, so they built uranium/plutonium reactors that would satisfy that insane requirement. Now, those same reactors haunt us with the specter of accidental and/or deliberate catastrophe. Inevitable, statistically predictable and worsening catastrophe, once enough of the damned things come online. New reactors = new Chernobyls. No question, merely a matter of time and numbers, whether or not the runaway Japanese reactors and their fuel pools are recovered.

Why doesn’t academia and the media stop calling nuclear/coal anything but the cholera excrement it is, and start seriously discussing a clean energy future? The lot of you have been paid so much money to shut down every viable alternative for so long, you’ve actually started believing your own mercenary lies.

There is one thing Americans have always been good at. That is rejecting a perfect storm of self-serving lies from on high, and heading off in the totally opposite direction at flank speed, despite all the self-serving flack in opposition to this endeavor. The divine right to rule of George III, the biblical sanction of slavery, or the enthronement of raw greed over the common good (invalidated by the Great Depression and repeatedly, sadly, since, for any honest observer to see); those used to be “we cannot change this” common knowledge. The people of the United States never hesitated to overthrow a status quo whose safety date had expired, and set their native talent, ingenuity and plain hard work to implement a more progressive, more productive alternative. What we do best. Let me repeat that. What we do best.

It is time, once again, for senile elites to step aside, voluntarily or otherwise, and allow this Nation to find its new path to clean energy in the absence of their self-serving and dangerously obsolete counsel. Nuts to the expense, nuts to the difficulty, nuts to the VIP portfolios emptied in the process. This is a matter of national survival in the short term, and planetary survival long term. Tear out all the crap and start over from scratch. Come out the other end with a clean, sustainable energy economy free of greed-driven obsolescence and decay.

Let’s get going with a Thorium-based national energy project!
By the way, pure Thorium reactors, not half-assed, so-called pebble bed Thorium/Uranium hybrids, with all the inconveniences of both systems. Which rotten compromise is what the powers-that-be would ram through, if they were given half a chance.

 

S04I2

8:59 AM ET

March 20, 2011

"Initial signs thus suggest

"Initial signs thus suggest that Beijing has moved beyond what one scholar calls "the harsher jingoistic anti-Japanese reflex in China that has poisoned relations with Japan in recent years."

Now, the initial 'signs' mentioned were $4.5 million in aid and appears willing to dispatch personnel to assist in the relief and recovery efforts.

$4.5 million dollars.
One South Korean actor donated $11 million dollars within 24hrs.
China, one of the super powers in the world and the 2nd largest economy, 'reluctantly' sent aid as can be seen from the fact that it was one of the last countries to dispatch personnel and send monetary aid.
I could not agree that this is in any way a sign that Beijing has moved beyond its anti-Japanese reflex.