Qaddafi Under Siege

A political psychologist assesses Libya's mercurial leader.

BY JERROLD M. POST | MARCH 15, 2011

The rambling statements of Muammar al-Qaddafi since the uprising in Libya began on Feb. 17 have led many to characterize the idiosyncratic Libyan leader as a madman, psychotic, out of touch with reality. Among the statements made by Qaddafi that have led observers to question his sanity are his characterization of the rebels as "drug-crazed youth" whose Nescafé the United States plied with hallucinogenic drugs. He also accused al Qaeda of being behind the rebellion, only to then again accuse the United States. In his first media interview on Feb. 28 since the uprising began, with BBC, ABC, and the Sunday Times, when asked about his countrymen rising against him, Qaddafi denied it:

"There are no demonstrations at all in the streets. Did you see the demonstrations? Where? They are supporting us. They are not against us. There is no one against us. Against me for what? Because I am not president. They love me. All my people are with me. They love me all. They will die to protect me, my people."

This led many to conclude that he was denying reality. He also went on a rant blaming al Qaeda:

"It is Qaeda, it is Qaeda, it is Qaeda, not my people. It is Qaeda, Qaeda, Qaeda, yes. They came from outside. It's al Qaeda. They went into military bases and seized arms and they're terrorizing the people. The people who had the weapons were the youngsters. They're starting to lay down their weapons now as the drugs that al Qaeda gave them wear off."

When he was asked in the interview whether he would step down, Qaddafi again denied that he has any authority:

"If they want me to step down, what do I step down from? I'm not a monarch or a king. It's honorary. It has nothing to with exercising power or authority. In Britain, who has the power? Is it Queen Elizabeth or David Cameron?"

Most recently Qaddafi indicated that the rebellion was the result of a conspiracy by the West to recolonize Libya in order to gain control of its oil.

Characterizations of being psychotic have been leveled at Qaddafi since he took over the reins of Libya in a bloodless coup in 1969 at the age of 27. A Time magazine article from April 1986 quoted U.S. President Ronald Reagan as calling him "the mad dog of the Middle East." But for the most part, during his 42 years at the helm of Libya, he has been crazy like a fox.

While this is not a definitive clinical diagnosis, Qaddafi can best be characterized as having a borderline personality. The "borderline" often swings from intense anger to euphoria. Under his often "normal" facade, he is quite insecure and sensitive to slight. His reality testing is episodically faulty. While most of the time Qaddafi is "above the border" and in touch with reality, when under stress he can dip below it and his perceptions can be distorted and his judgment faulty. And right now, he is under the most stress he has been under since taking over the leadership of Libya. Thus, the quotes elaborated above probably accurately reflect his true beliefs. He does sincerely cling to the idea that his people all love him.

Qaddafi's strong anti-authority bent and his tendency to identify with the underdog can be traced back to his childhood. He was born in a tent in the desert to a Bedouin family in 1942. When Qaddafi was 10 years old, Gamal Abdel Nasser took over the reins of Egypt at the head of the Free Officers Movement, which made a deep and lasting impression on the young Qaddafi. He initially attended a Muslim school, where he was recognized as being very bright, and was sent to Tripoli to continue his education, but was teased by the children of the cosmopolitan elite for his coarse manners, leaving him with a bitter resentment of the establishment.

In Libya at that time, a military career provided an opportunity for upward mobility, and Qaddafi entered the Libyan military academy in Benghazi in 1961. Nasser and his revolutionary nationalism assumed a heroic stature in the mind of Qaddafi and his fellow students. He first began to think of organizing a military coup against the corrupt regime of King Idris while in military college, and on Sept. 1, 1969, with a small group of junior military officers, formed Libya's own Free Officers Movement and successfully led a bloodless coup to depose the king.

From the very beginnings of his leadership of the junta known as the Revolutionary Command Council, the deeply anti-establishment Qaddafi actively supported groups that he considered underdogs, who represented themselves as attacking imperialism. He became one of the world's most notorious supporters of terrorist groups around the world, with no particular benefit to Libya. His support of terrorism was both wide and deep. He sent arms to the Irish Republican Army, provided financial support to the social revolutionary group FARC in Colombia, and to the Red Army Faction in Germany and the Red Brigades in Italy. He reportedly provided major financial support to the "Black September" organization responsible for the massacre of the Israeli Olympic team at the Munich Olympics in 1972. He praised the terrorist attack by the Japanese Red Army on the Lod Airport in Tel Aviv, Israel, urged Palestinian terrorist groups to carry out attacks on Israel, and offered to provide financial support and training.

Following Nasser's lead, he attempted to create a pan-Arab nation, merging first with Egypt and Syria, and then later attempting to merge with Tunisia, but his would-be partners were quick to discover that to merge with Libya was to be taken over by Qaddafi, leading to the swift failure of these proposed unions. In Qaddafi's modest view, he and Libya were at the very center of three overlapping circles: the Arab world, the Muslim world, and the Third World.

MANOOCHER DEGHATI/AFP/Getty Images

 

Jerrold M. Post is professor of psychiatry, political psychology, and international affairs and director of the political psychology program at George Washington University. Before assuming his position at GWU, he had a 21-year career at the Central Intelligence Agency, where he was the founding director of the Center for the Analysis of Personality and Political Behavior. He is the author of Leaders and Their Followers in a Dangerous World.

GRANT

1:05 AM ET

March 16, 2011

I would suggest that we take

I would suggest that we take a great deal of care in attempting to analyze anyone without actually being able to observe them in person. Aside from that I will agree that he probably isn't insane, much as I wish he were.

 

SERSERICOCUQ

3:35 PM ET

March 16, 2011

Thanks

sana gelmek istiyorum aramizda sira daglar porno senden gitmek istiyorum aramizda sira daglar gozun yasi pinar olmus senin icin her gun aglar saol

 

VONRYANSEXPRESS

9:38 AM ET

March 16, 2011

The Colonel gets a pass.

Quick editorial note: the name of the former Ethiopian strong-man is Mengistu Haile Mariam, not "Haile Mengistu".

Regarding Mr. Qaddafi, it is indeed a bitter comment on national interest(s) and geo-politics that he will not be 'forced to fight till the end' this time out because his challengers appear to be so oblique that the west and the Sunni gulf will not support them. Better the costume we know than the mufti we suspect?

One time Col. Qaddafi called for all Arab states to send their Air Forces simultaneously against Israel in a coordinated attack from all sides. It didn't stimulate much interest in Arab capitols after the air campaign over the Bekaa Valley in 1982, but the model would suit the needs today with the caveat, the air power of just one state could stop Qaddafi's regrouping cold. Doesn't appear that there is a real desire to support the rebellion.

Perhaps the Benghazi fighters can retreat south to the Chad and wage a "Toyota War" from the Aozou Strip. Any shelter in the sand storm.

 

COFFIE

1:04 PM ET

March 16, 2011

dictators are weirdoes

I tend to agree with the article. He must really think is has to be at the helm of Libya, having ousted anyone around him who is not a sycophant, like the Eastern European systems.

And he probably even thinks that people actually like him. Surprise: they do not. He has told himself that anything Libya has achieved is all because of him so many times - and listened to sycophants repeat that - that he does not distinguish between the leader as a job and the country. He does not see himself as having just another job, but as a cornerstone of Libya. That does not make rational sense.

He really does not see that the world has moved on. The leader is also another job; it is not to be the parent of the people. If that were the case, the kids have gone to college.

He is not Libya. He has not achieved much for it. He has mostly hurt it. Significantly. That is the message his people hide.

Everyone makes a decision. Everyone who stands behind his regime makes a stand to stand beside him. Not to stand for Libya, but to support that regime. When he is gone, that country can survive without him alright. If 'his' supporters understood that, they will stop looking for outsiders to put the blame on.

Introducing the idea that country can function without a particular leader, i.e. Libya is not all about Quaddafi, can be a very powerful message for his supporters to find another leader.

 

JEAN KAPENDA

5:24 PM ET

March 16, 2011

Qaddafi Is Not Alone !

Qaddafi is not alone. We've also got our Mad Basenjis in Black Africa as well. As you move south, there is almost no democratization, rather what I've coined "dictocratization" of the African continent. Simply put, dictocratization is a political process where dictators use and manipulate state resources to be fraudulently elected. It is a transmutation of a species of dictators into dictocrats in a neo-tyrannical phase. Like the desert tyrant, ours in Black Africa also bark and believe they're the only ones fitted for the job!

 

DWIGHTBAKER

7:41 AM ET

March 17, 2011

Maybe harsher things are to come!

Qaddafi Under Siege
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/03/15/qaddafi_under_seige?commentspace=true
US Pushes For Air strikes On Libya On The Verge Of A Civilian Massacre In Benghazi

Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/libya-thursday-march-17-2011-3?utm_source=Triggermail&utm_medium=email&utm_term=10+Things+Before+the+Opening+Bell&utm_campaign=10Thing_NL_03172011#ixzz1GrFijN5m

MY TAKE
By Dwight Baker
Dbaker007@stx.rr.com

Maybe harsher things are to come!

Big oil and big banking and our own run away corporate giants that want more and more that they are behind the current crises in the Mediterranean! Do we remember the Banana republic? Can we think back on how we deposed the powers in Chile to take over all our corporations wanted? How about Iraq and all the oil that the Big boys wanted and to control the trade routes from east to west?

Yesterday Senator John McCain proposed the no-fly zone and today the entire crew on the hill has chimed right in.

We the People may be on an endless cycle of speed bumps. I hate those things and I also hate how much confusion is going on in my America today.

Many goof balls in the legion of moron media blasters say off the wall things that bring serious doubts to those basically unknowing. I see through the endless mindless rhetoric and then in a few moments I have all I need of what I suppose is the real news to go on. Yet then I think how many do not? And they set spell bound and in a short time fear grasp them.

So why did I say maybe harsher things are to come?

Ignorance is not a protector never has been and never will be.

Need I say more?

 

GEJSZA FIRST

1:13 PM ET

April 13, 2011

He probably even thinks that

He probably even thinks that people actually like him. Surprise: they do not. He has told himself that anything Libya has achieved is all because of him so many times - and listened to sycophants repeat that - that he does not distinguish between the leader as a job and the country. He does not see himself as having just another job, but as a cornerstone of Libya. That does not make rational sense. Big oil and big banking and our own run away corporate giants that want more and more that they are behind the current crises in the Mediterranean! Do we remember the Banana republic? Can we think back on how we deposed the powers in Chile to take over all our corporations wanted? How about Iraq and all the oil that the Big boys wanted and to control the trade routes from east to west? We've also got our Mad Basenjis in Black Africa as well. As you move south, there is almost no democratization, rather what I've coined "dictocratization" of the African continent. Simply put, dictocratization is a political process where dictators use and manipulate state resources to be fraudulently elected. It is a transmutation of a species of dictators into dictocrats in a neo-tyrannical phase. Like the desert tyrant, ours in Black Africa also bark and believe they're the only ones fitted for the job!Everyone makes a decision. Everyone who stands behind his regime makes a stand to stand beside him. Not to stand for Libya, but to support that regime. When he is gone, that country can survive without him alright. If 'his' supporters understood that, they will stop looking for outsiders to put the blame on.