WikiLosers

Julian Assange said WikiLeaks would change the world. At the very least, it changed these people's lives forever.

BY CHARLES HOMANS | MARCH 25, 2011

Over the weekend, Carlos Pascual (above) stepped down from his post as U.S. ambassador to Mexico over an unsparing January 2010 cable about Mexico's flailing drug war, and Mexican President Felipe Calderón's handling of it, that WikiLeaks published in December. The disclosure had poisoned Pascual's relationship with Calderón, and by the end his departure was all but inevitable -- even if Pascual wasn't telling Foggy Bottom anything that everyone (the Mexican president probably included) didn't know already.

Nearly four months after WikiLeaks dropped its first State Department cables, no one can say that Julian Assange's radical transparency project hasn't left a sizable mark on global politics. But whom exactly has he brought down? It's not necessarily the people we might have expected: The Singaporean ambassador at large who called the second-biggest economic power in the neighborhood a "big fat loser" has emerged from the controversy more or less unscathed. The Lebanese defense minister who gave Israel advice on how to invade his country is still around. The U.S. diplomat who signed -- though may not have written -- the epic Dagestani wedding cable still has his high-ranking State Department job, and the one who signed off on a series of withering Silvio Berlusconi portraits in the U.S. Embassy in Rome doesn't appear to have gone anywhere, either.

So who are the losers? Foreign Policy takes a chronological look at WikiLeaks' casualties and near casualties so far, an eclectic group of unfortunates that includes political leaders, diplomats, corporate executives, and the organization's own sources.

ALFREDO ESTRELLA/AFP/Getty Images

 

Charles Homans is an associate editor at Foreign Policy.

L0LALLTHETIME

1:54 PM ET

March 25, 2011

wikileaks is amazing

"wikilosers" - the author of this post is obviously pretty butthurt about wikileaks. LOL somebody is mad...most likely because wikileaks has struck a chord with the public, hahahahahahahahahahahaha.

wikileaks is awesome

kudos to julian assange for putting the truth in the public domain!

the internet is serious business OP

 

ANON45

10:03 AM ET

March 26, 2011

LoL

umad wikileaks got pwnt?

 

DDSHIN

1:58 PM ET

March 27, 2011

Seriously...?

Did you bother reading this before posting? If you had, then you would be aware of the fact that the author is referring to the people who "lost" their positions due to wikileaks: hence wiki"losers". Why you would bother posting your thoughts on an article without reading past the title completely escapes me.

 

TECUMSEH35

4:21 PM ET

March 28, 2011

Sorry to burst your fantasy

Sorry to burst your fantasy world bubble, but the author is right. Outside of maybe 15-20% of the people who follow foriegn affairs, the public doesnt know and dosnt care. We have alot more serious things to worry about. He is a hero to the non-shower taking anti-globalists, anti-Americans and as usual, anti-semites. He will be in prison for the rest of his life. If he has the misfortune to end up in an American prison, it will be a short life.

 

L0LALLTHETIME

1:56 PM ET

March 25, 2011

stop with the propaganda

stop with the propaganda against wikileaks

it's bullshit. though in my opinion, i can only assume the US government is pushing for propaganda against it, and gagging the media to stop publishing the huge stories within the leaks

 

TECUMSEH35

4:26 PM ET

March 28, 2011

So, now that this has failed

So, now that this has failed to inspire your grand leftist revolution, what's next? Your running out of ammo.

 

CPPTHIS

7:39 PM ET

March 25, 2011

well...

First page pretty much says it, as amusing and probably useful as Wikileaks is it hasn't really revealed anything that everybody didn't already know so the casualties are pretty much limited to the leakers themselves and some low-hanging fruit like the Tunisian regime. As for Assange himself, he's pretty much owned himself courtesy of egomania but self-styled Truth Crusaders tend to do that sort of thing.

 

TEASER38

9:33 PM ET

March 25, 2011

It wouldn't be the first time pecadillos...

brought down a public figure. To say his rape charges are anything but his own doing, unless the two ladies really are lying, is disingenuous. Most of his associates, as typified by Mr. Domscheit-Berg, have stated he is a paranoid delusional jerk.

 

WHISKEYPAPA

11:26 AM ET

March 31, 2011

Scott Ritter

Recall that when Scott Ritter called BS on Bush's Iraqi WMD claims back in 2003, he was soon charged with soliciting sex over the internet with a minor.

Make the wrong noise and they will come for you.

Walt

 

ANON45

10:05 AM ET

March 26, 2011

Hey...

whatever happened to the documents from Russia or China anyways? I remember reading that they had documents about them that would be released, then nothing.

Guess they got scared... truth and justice indeed lol!

 

PNPHOWARD

9:42 PM ET

March 26, 2011

pnphoward

Interesting article, nicely done. But a few thoughts...

Whether he actually deserved to go or not, Howard Davis doesn't really belong on this list. He would have been kicked out of his position at the London School of Economics for sure regardless of his mention in a Wikileaks cable. His acceptance of millions from Libya on behalf of the LSE (or the Libyan School of Economics as it's now known) was officially announced and was up in neon lights. As you can imagine, the students were hardly impressed. The Wikileaks cables were definitely not a significant, let alone decisive, part of the case made against him.

I'm surprised that Mubarak and other members of the former Egyptian kleptocracy, and also Qaddafi's recently killed son, aren't on this list, as the rebels in those countries were surely inspired/encouraged by the events in Tunisia?

I'd also question your choice of wording suggesting that the fact that US was allegedly complicit in a negative local media campaign against a would-be presidential candidate in another democratic country is not a big deal. Wow. I know the world's not perfect, but it sure as hell should be. Try reversing the names of the countries and imagine how that would go down in the US.

 

YARBELS

10:55 AM ET

March 29, 2011

Info On White House Budget

" WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve will publish new details about its emergency lending to banks during the 2008 financial crisis after the Supreme Court on Monday rejected a White House appeal for secrecy." No wonder the Flee Bagger Party are afraid to create a budget! Remember none of this has anything to do with the republicans not doing their jobs! The Dems of evil and their punter should have has this finished a year ago. We all know why the little girls did not do their jobs. Why would Republicans lower themselves to even speak to these Flee Bagger Party members amazes me! I treat all humans with respect. These Flee Baggers are a lesser species and should be treated as such. As always you can contact me at work http://www.michigan-businessreview.com and keep the jokes coming!It looks like Obama has gone more that a little "Gadhafi Duck" on us. Is it Obama's plan to take over for Qaddafi? Finally a job he is qualified for

 

NORTHERNER

8:19 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Well, Bradley Manning is

Well, Bradley Manning is certainly someone who didn't come out on top here, but I have to say that he brought it upon himself. What kind of person thinks they'll get labeled a hero, free from military punishment, for leaking thousands of state secrets?

Assange is up there too.

I have to say that the biggest losers are the Afghan informants who's lives were either altered or destroyed simply because they were making their lives a better place. If Assange really wanted to be the crusader he thought he was, he would've at least avoid bringing those people in Afghanistan into the picture. The Taliban has internet too...

 

GLENANTON

1:05 AM ET

April 18, 2011

I have to say that the

I have to say that the biggest losers are the Afghan informants who's lives were either altered or destroyed simply because they were making their lives a better place. If Assange Reiki really wanted to be the crusader he thought he was, he would've at least avoid bringing those people in Afghanistan into the picture.