Stiff Upper Lip

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad may have shaved off his mustache, but it's going to take a whole lot more than that to convince the world that he's not a dictator. FP investigates the whiskers that autocrats wear.

BY CHARLES HOMANS | MARCH 30, 2011

Mustafa Kemal Ataturk

"The Kaiser"

Nearly every aspect of the father of modern Turkey's life was freighted with historical significance, and his upper lip was no exception. The soaring mustache Ataturk wore as a young army captain (above, in 1907) was popular in the Ottoman era, modeled on the grooming style of Kaiser Wilhelm II, which reflected the influence of German culture on the Turkish intelligentsia of the period. But by the time Ataturk took office as the autocratic ruler of the new Republic of Turkey in 1923, his mustache had been pared back to a conservative bristle; as he guided Turkey toward economic and political liberalization in the years that followed he shaved it off entirely, as a symbolic example of Turkey leaving behind its Ottoman past in favor of a modern future.

But the Turkish mustache was not so easily vanquished; it continued to advance and retreat, in both size and significance, in the decades that followed. In the 1970s, a walrus-style mustache became a popular accessory among Turkey's leftists. By the 1990s, it had evolved into a class symbol distinguishing the hirsute lower and middle classes from the clean-shaven urban elite. It returned to power in 2002 atop the lip of current Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, a gesture of his populist appeal.

Francisco Franco

"The Generalísimo"

Of all the dictatorial mustaches of mid-20th century Europe, Spanish General Francisco Franco's was undoubtedly the least memorable, which perhaps explains why it does not carry the stigma today of its German and Soviet contemporaries. But the blandness of the Spanish model belies its influence: A Franco-style martial brush was a near-mandatory part of the Latin American military dictator uniform well into the 1980s. For years after Franco's death, his pilatory legacy adorned the faces of Chile's Augusto Pinochet, Guatemala's Fernando Romeo Lucas García, and half the officers in Argentina's post-Perón junta, among others.

Adolf Hitler

"The Hitler"

When it first appeared on men's faces in the late 19th century, the mustache that Adolf Hitler made infamous was known as the "toothbrush." Not so much today. The Hitler mustache, Rich Cohen wrote in Vanity Fair in 2007, "did not only die with the Führer -- it was embalmed with him. It was his essence, and so it has been relegated to the black book of history."

All the stranger, then, that Hitler's signature facial accessory was originally of American, not German, extraction -- and that its arrival in Germany was at first greeted with some ambivalence. According to a 1907 New York Times dispatch from Berlin, German women hated the thing, vastly preferring the Kaiserbart that Ataturk had once coveted. "Man is naturally very ugly," one woman wrote to the Berliner Tageblatt newspaper at the time. "The only natural adornment he ever had was his mustache, and that he is now ruthlessly mutilating. Instead of the peaceful hirsute ornament of the past he is now marring his face with a lot of bristles." Of course, after April 1945, they didn't have that problem anymore.

Joseph Stalin

"The Cockroach"

Stalin's walrus mustache never quite achieved the status of shorthand for modern barbarity as Hitler's did, but it was an indelible part of his public image -- and a target for his detractors. "Stalin is known the world over for his mustache, but not for his wisdom," the smooth-lipped Josip Broz Tito, Yugoslavia's then-prime minister, remarked in 1951 as relations with his Soviet erstwhile mentor were fraying.

Stalin could be quite sensitive about these things, as the Russian poet Osip Mandelstam learned the hard way. In 1933, shortly after Stalin's agricultural collectivization policies plunged the Soviet Union into famine, Mandelstam wrote a short and searing poem titled "Epigram Against Stalin." Its contemptuous evocation of the dictator included a few unkind words about his facial hair:

His greasy fingers are thick as worms,
his words weighty hammers slamming their target.
His cockroach moustache seems to snicker,
and the shafts of his high-topped boots gleam.

Bad move. Stalin was not amused, and had Mandelstam arrested and sentenced to exile in the Ural Mountains.

Saddam Hussein

"The Desert Eagle"

Though the model that he sported in his prime was Stalin-esque in its particulars, Saddam Hussein's mustache was less a product of his own self-styled personality cult than it was of Iraqi tradition. Bushy mustaches had been synonymous with manhood in Iraq since the 16th century, a remnant of Ottoman rule in Mesopotamia. Disrespecting them was a grave insult; at a summit in Doha days before the beginning of the Iraq war in 2003, Iraqi diplomat Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri lashed out at his Kuwaiti counterpart by shouting, "Curse be upon your mustache!" Rallying military officers in Baghdad the same week, Saddam invoked a tribal adage, telling them, "I don't need to say that Iraq is attached to your mustache, because after all it is your country."

In the early months of the war, U.S. soldiers played along; many units were ordered to grow mustaches as a nod to local culture. But as the war took a turn for the worse in 2004, the razors came back out. "We grew them for the Iraqi people," Marine Lt. Col. Brennan Byrne told the Associated Press on the eve of the battle for Fallujah in April 2004. "We shaved them off for us." As for Saddam himself, he went to the gallows in 2006 not with his signature jet-black mustache, but with a salt-and-pepper beard.

Robert Mugabe

"The Hitler Lite"

The Zimbabwean strongman's mustache is easy to miss, cropped so closely within the confines of his philtrum that it could be mistaken for a shadow. But it's there nonetheless, the narrowest of toothbrushes -- and if it evokes a certain Führer, it may not be entirely by accident. Mugabe is an unapologetic fan: On the eve of a brutal reprisal against his opponents in 2003, he declared, "I am still the Hitler of the time. This Hitler has only one objective, justice for his own people, sovereignty for his people, recognition of the independence of his people, and their right to their resources. If that is Hitler, then let me be a Hitler tenfold. Ten times, that is what we stand for."

Aleksandr Lukashenko

"The Apparatchik"

When a CNN reporter described Europe's last dictator in 2001 as "a man whose 1950s-style Soviet-era rule is echoed by his Stalinist moustache," he gave the Belarusian strongman far too much credit -- Lukashenko's trapezoidal soup-strainer is more mid-tier bureaucrat than world-historical tyrant. Nevertheless, Lukashenko's detractors have latched onto his mustache with aplomb. In 2005, student demonstrators were jailed for wearing fake presidential whiskers; and when Lukashenko arrived in Lithuania for an official visit in September 2009, he was met with protest banners reading, "No country for mustache!"

Bashar al-Assad

"The Family Heirloom"

The Syrian president's decision to shave the mustache he had sported for his entire political life prior to his March 30 speech promising an implausible array of reforms was no doubt intended to carry some symbolic weight in the Middle East -- a region in which the mustache has often been seen as the bristly line between tradition and modernity. But Assad's thin variant beneath his beak of a nose never made much of an impression to begin with (though it did inspire Christopher Hitchens to call him a "human toothbrush"). Like most other things about his presidency, it was a hand-me-down from his father and presidential predecessor, Hafez al-Assad, who wore a considerably more robust version of the same during his nearly three decades of rule. Taking over a successful family business is never easy.

 

Charles Homans is an associate editor of Foreign Policy.

READERCOMMENTER

3:36 AM ET

March 31, 2011

Irrelevant and wrong info

bashar always had his mustache like this, this is so not FP quality.
check out any old pic of bashar or youtube links dating 2008 or even older.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IaqzXX2WTck&feature=related

on other note if not more 80% or males now in the arab world, tukey or the other countries like spain back then grow mustache, lol i didnt beleive im reading this article on FP. such a shame

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6_3RWu_QaU&feature=related

 

DENNISGORDON

12:07 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Fame

By writing an article with absolute ignorance and simple false acquisition for the last great leader of the past century , you have achieved great fame but lost your reputation FP

 

WHATASHAME

2:05 PM ET

March 31, 2011

who is Charles Homans?

Dear Mr Homans,

After I have read your article, I wanted know about your background and maybe your qualifications to write such an article like this.

If this article is about mustaches, I do not think you are a fashion adviser or FP is a fashion magazine.
If this is a histo-political article, I am sorry to say Mr.Homans, I do not think your background is not enough to write an article like this. I have googled your name but could not find anything about you... Maybe FP should have a profile page for their authors. It is a genuine feedback.

Anyway, Let me share a couple of things about "How to write an article"

1-Determine your topic

2-Figure out who your audience is

3-Do your research ****** This is where you have clearly failed*****

4-Compile a list of possible sources for you to consult *** You can use maybe Harvard referencing**** Nobody needs to read your assumptions Mr.Homans, people needs to read facts. My university tutor used to say:
" Never assume! "Assume" is "make an ass of u and me.... "

5-Check over your piece for presentation.Check for faulty information. Have you double-checked your facts?Delete any unnecessary or contradictory information...

These were the basics of "How to write an article Mr.Homans. It is a shame, because you have failed to follow these basics!

According to Oxford dictionary; Dictator means " a ruler with total power over a country".

Mustafa Kemal Ataturk was not a ruler with total power over a country. He was not the new sultan of Ottoman Empire. Turks had lived under and ruled by sultans, khans for centuries. And we, Turks know the difference between a sultan/khan/king and ATATURK which means "father of the Turks". What a great and lovely name isnt it? And it is given to him by his people, us...

Lord Patrick Kinross has a book about ATATURK.... it is 8 GBp in amazon... If you do not have enough money, I will lend my copy to you... Just be genuine and ask, I promise I will send my copy to FP s address...

Lord.Kinross describes Ataturk in his book: "He was an outstanding soldier-statesman of the first half of twentieth century. He regenerated his country, transforming the old sprawling Ottoman Empire into a new compact Turkish Republic" p.17

I do not think Mustafa Kemal Ataturk belongs to this list. I would expect an apology from you and/or FP to publish a non sense article.

Best Regards

 

GEORG GEORGIAN

4:13 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Liar

Ataturk is 100 % Dictator like Hitler.

 

SAADETTOKER

4:49 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Ataturk

This is what Ataturk said about the Fallen soldiers from other nations in Galipoli:

"Those heroes that shed their blood and lost their lives (at Gallipoli battles).. You are now lying in the soil of a friendly country. Therefore rest in peace. There is no difference between the Johnnies and the Mehmets to us where they lie side by side here in this country of ours.. You the mothers who sent their sons from far away countries wipe away your tears. Your sons are now living in our bosom and are in peace. Having lost their lives on this land they have become our sons as well."

Another quote from him: "PEACE AT HOME PEACE IN THE WORLD"

Obviously,the author did not study history and one of the commentators is blinded by his hatred against Turks or extremely ignorant to make a comparison like this. Ataturk is one of the graetest leaders ever lived on this Earth.

 

_MUGE_

5:40 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Yuhhh

Are you crazy? Atatürk is flight commander. Everybody see it. Your commandant to take on board to. I think you must ascertain. I to feel pity for you. Somebody bilk you.....

 

GARY1

5:50 PM ET

March 31, 2011

ATATURK

I think you guy's should get more education. There are other countries as well as USA. ATATURK is father of Turks. Before you given comment please educate your self

 

MRTCNPLT

8:37 PM ET

March 31, 2011

How can you dare giving such

How can you dare giving such bullshit information and accusing one of the best leaders of the world history. Ataturk and his actions should be evaluated within his times and one must be a real dumbass to call him a dictator. there is not one single line in the whole article that can explain why they have listed Ataturk amongst such evils. I guess you should first take a look at your own dictators. You're just a bunch of red necks, racist and ignorant b...s.

 

ATATURCO

4:35 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Delete Ataturk from this list

Delete Ataturk from this list urgently , or i guess you will be in big trouble!!! how dare you put his name to this list? dont you have 1 gram brain? whaT is ur ambition? just delete it...

 

ATATURCO

4:36 AM ET

April 1, 2011

...Delete Ataturk from this

...Delete Ataturk from this list urgently , or i guess you will be in big trouble!!! how dare you put his name to this list? dont you have 1 gram brain? whaT is ur ambition? just delete it...

 

BURKAY

5:07 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Ataturk is one of the brightest minds in the human history

Is is an ashame to list Ataturk in the list of dictators or autocrats or whatever you call it. He is the father of modern Republic of Turkey and beloved commander, teacher, president, leader and founder of Turkish people. Your irrevelant article I am sure, does not mean anything who knows enough about Mustafa Kemal Ataturk.

Rest at peace Mustafa Kemal ATATURK, founder of the modern Republic of Turkey...

 

ERZURUMLU

5:16 AM ET

April 1, 2011

cant resist commenting

Ataturk was great leader you all now that leader of democracy , his old enemies admiring him, he must be very good.
How ever Armenians they have distoryed my town many times thanks to support of French and Russians. and also many other parts of Ottoman empire , our gerat leader brought happines and peace in to the region he was not a dictator if he a had mustache that was when was young and mustache was in fashion , when he became leader he was shaven all the time.Look at to old Europeans and American aristocrats they all had there mustaches they must be dictators to.
reagards.

 

BBAYBURT

5:18 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Ill-informed arrogancy

As an influential publication this magazine should apologize.

I am an Australian and somehow found Mr Homans' knowledge level on M Kemal Ataturk rather poor and biased.

Please use your influence fairly.

Regards

Beck Burt
Sydney

 

ILKERNEBI

5:21 AM ET

April 1, 2011

funny and idiotic

Ataturk was the greatest leader in the last century in the world. He founded modern Turkey. All of the comments opposite of him is desire for vengeance like people's comment who wrote this article.

 

MACIT

5:38 AM ET

April 1, 2011

What do you know about

What do you know about Mustafa Kemal ATATURK ???

 

BERKERGUN

5:47 AM ET

April 1, 2011

He was not a dictator.He gave

He was not a dictator.He gave our women election right.You, Imperialists don't like him neutrally.All innocent Eastern folks were waken up by Mustafa Kemal.He ruin your plans.He's still phenomenon for Eastern folks.He didn't accept Imperialist.Because of that you don't like him.Because of that you say' he was a dictator'.

 

GERCEKTURK

6:29 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Ataturk The big genius and the kindest man I had ever heard.

The people who is calling Atatürk a killer!!!!!!!. You need to read his own letters that he wrote to his friends and to his mother, he is very kind and respectful man to human, he is a humanist actually, and he wants peace for the world.
He actually, ended a theocratic fascism in Turkey.
His only goal is to keep the Turkey undivided, independent and clean from occupant enemies. And he scarified his life and body for the people of Turkey. He is the 2nd holiest man in my life after Muhammed Mustafa. He wants his people always educated, good in science and technology and in for all social activities (Sports...) .
I am using present tense, not because of my grammar is bad, its because Ataturk's body had past away but his ideals and his soul is with us and living, and will live until all of us and our children and their children may be dies, may be to the end of the world who knows.
I am ATATURK and we have Millions of ATATURK in Turkey currently. And you must be sure that everyone of us is sensitive about ATATURK. So his name is not belong to this list. We like his ideas. And no body forces us about this. We are willingly putting his pictures to the office to our cars, home. Because we own our life to his ideas.
ATATURK

 

1881

7:51 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Ignorance

I find it pathetic to see that someone who thinks he is enlightened enough to write an article about a subject could make a fool of himself by writing something so ignorant!
Haven't you made any research? Seriously?
How come you think you're entitled to call ATATURK our Savior, our Hero, a dictator?
He brought, light, equality, wisdom, education, modernism and FREEDOM to our nation!

I find it ridiculous to even comment on this article.

http://www.ataturk.com/content/view/17/35/

I advise everyone to read more about Ataturk, I'm sure every World citizen would be impressed by such a great intelligence, high character and futuristic vision.

I'm proud to be a member of Ataturk's modern nation,and I'll always be his follower as long as I live.

 

MERSIN2013

8:02 AM ET

April 1, 2011

who is Charles Homans?

Delete Ataturk from this list urgently , or i guess you will be in big trouble!!! how dare you put his name to this list? dont you have 1 gram brain? whaT is ur ambition? just delete it...

 

ZIGURI

8:10 AM ET

April 1, 2011

SECRET AGENDA

I believe the author tried to draw a picture about Ataturk as a Dictator, Monopolist maybe because Ataturk refused to be part of EMPERALISM and NEW WORLD ORDER of his period!!!! He fought bravely against any type occupation of Turks as geographically, culturally and humanitarian.

We do know that there is a huge lobby against Turkey from different backgrounds of nations which the author also showed what he AIMED to create. Mentioning HITLER with the same category with ATATURK!!! HOW DARE YOU? I can only see your aim of truing to brain wash of Americans against Turkey for a secret AGENDA. Some people or let’s say nations are very disturbed with positive developments in Turkey and they are trying to put us down.

We are watching you.......

 

1923

9:15 AM ET

April 1, 2011

such a shame

dont u read any books or research before you start to write?
Atatürk is the best soldier and polition in last century. He is not a dictator.
You should remove this topic and do your homework more carefully.

 

LAV

9:57 AM ET

April 1, 2011

i dont remember any dictator

i dont remember any dictator who found a democratic country by himself. do u ?

 

ALPERDEM

10:17 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Ataturk was not a dictator!!!

Please, please, please. People who create a product which is highly related to public, it is so important to search the correctness of the data. Please verify it again and again. How can you call a magnificent leader as "dictator"?. How dare you? Do you think that it is ethical to make assumptions about a leader who have changed the destiny of a whole nation? Have you ever come to Türkiye? Have you ever asked Turkish people why we call him as "ATATÜRK", "Father of the Turks". Is it because he is a dictator? Do you think that it is logical? Why we aggressively react such an assumption to our leader? Is it because he was a dictator, but still we love him? Do you think that it is logical? Mustafa Kemal Atatürk was a great leader who gave us our life again as a nation. Do you know Lloyd George's words? Would you mind if I remind you please: " The world produces only a genius for every century. Genius of this century, unfortunately, has been bestowed on the Turks." Thus, please never again dare to name our ATATÜRK as "dictator" or "autocrat". He was a genius. Please memorize it: "Genius, and a leader".

 

ALPERDEM

10:45 AM ET

April 1, 2011

TO GEORG GEORGIAN

:D. what a subnormal person you are.

 

ALPERDEM

10:48 AM ET

April 1, 2011

TO GEORG GEORGIAN

:D. what a subnormal person you are.

 

BARBAROS52

11:01 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Liar, you are the real liar!

You poor creature,

Trying to be identified behind the tail of an unidentified below everything-thing. You are so stupid you lost soul, to chose a right object (forget about an identity) to be identify with. If you want to be someone, try to be like anyone but not like a nothing; who is trying to be something by defaming a massively huge Hero. Unfortunately that poor nothing (the one you like to be), is in a sad situation; without a trace of a brain, at the bottom of the brain-chain, trying to have faim only by defaming him. Of course I'm wrong and you may be right, you might be just alike!
Do you know what; when I see idiots like you, it is my confirmation that how much I'm right!

Barbaros Oner

 

HAYSIYETSIZ FP

2:17 PM ET

April 1, 2011

TÜRK

Bu yaz?y? yazan embesil ki?i;Derginin kalitesi ya da okuyucu miktar? hiç önemli de?il,sen e?er bir dergide editörüm diye geçiniyorsan öncelikle i?ini adam gibi yapmak zorundas?n.Bir yaz? yazmaya yelteniyorsan,ara?t?rman? adam gibi yap?p öyle yazmak zorundas?n.Senin ?erefine haysiyetine ba?lar?m!El alemin itleriyle Mustafa Kemal ATATÜRK'ü hiç bir ?ekilde ayn? kefeye koyamayacak olman?n d???nda sen O'nun ad?n? a?z?na dahi alamazs?n.Sen ve senin soyundan olan bir avuç ?erefsizin gözünde diktatör olabilir;Ancak kendi halk?na,milletine kar?? son derece duyarl?,laik,demokratik,halkç?,milliyetçi,devletçi,mükemmel bir ADAMd?.Kuyruk ac?lar?n?z yüzünden son derece modern,ça?da? olan atam?z?n de?erli ad?n? koku?mu? kalemlerinze alet etmeyin can?m?z? s?kmay?n bizim.Sabr?m?z? s?namay?n.Öncelikle Atatürk'ün hayat? boyunca nas?l bir insan oldu?unu adam gibi ara?t?r ne bok yemeye diktatör diyerek kaleme ald???n? söyle e?er söyleyemeyeceksen de bu çirkin ve son derece yanl?? olan yaz?n için tüm Türk halk?ndan özür dile.Mustafa Kemal Atatürk ne b?y?kl?yd? ne de diktatör! Biz O'nun sayesinde Türk'üm diyoruz,bizi mutlu eden ki?i,özgürlü?ümüze sebep veren ki?i O'dur.Ne Mutlu Türk'üm Diyene!

Bi'tane de salak yazm?? "KURDO" lakapl? ona da sesleniyorum;Ulan ?erefsiz be?enmiyorsan biz Türklere ait olan topraklar? siktir git.Senin annen olacak kad?n seni do?urarak namusluluk mu yapm???Ya?ad??? topraklara ihanet eden bir ki?iyi meydana getirip bu ?ekilde beyinsizce yeti?tirdi?i için benim gözümde de o kad?n iyi bir kad?n olmamakla beraber atam?z Mustafa Kemal için sarf etti?in o senin a?z?na lay?k iki kelimeyi yani "orospu çocu?u" laf?n? aynen sana iade ediyorum.Öyle olan sensin çünkü!

Yav?aklar!

 

AYAN KOKSAL

3:23 PM ET

April 1, 2011

such a shame

what did you think Mr. Homans

" i don't know. i must write a article because i am a writer and i need money so... hey this guy have a mustache... what a minute..."

does this look like your idea?

 

TURKER

6:46 AM ET

April 2, 2011

Ignorance and Envy

Only a fool or an idiot can attempt to compare Ataturk with dictators or so-called Arabic leaders. Ataturk was a genius who waged war against the invaders in his country and imperialism. Not only did he liberate our country, TURKIYE, but also he set a good example to other nations who don't want to live in captivity.
With this meaningless article, you have revealed your ignorance and envy at Ataturk. Obviously, as the members of so- called civilised nations that live on blood and imperialism, you envy Ataturk his success because you were unable to defeat him and now you prefer to slander.
As for Adolf Hitler, perhaps you don't know or pretend not to know, he started World War 2 and caused the deaths of millions of people.
Shame on you FP, you employ such ignorant foreign editors.

 

MERICERG

3:49 PM ET

April 2, 2011

Comparing Ataturk with Hitler?

a) You either don't know history
b) or you don't know who Hitler is
c) or you don't know who Ataturk is
d) or you are the victim of your prejudices..

In all case, someone needs to help you t find the truth..
Truth, nothing but the truth...

 

KAIOWAS

10:01 PM ET

April 2, 2011

to the uneducated editor.

I strongly suggest you to check wikipedia before you write anything to cover your ignorance. Writing about the one who is extremely important for whole country makes you responsible, especially if your writing for the magazine which is read by many people all around the world.
I cant tell you how much disgusting to read this wrong informations.

 

MARKSHIELDS

1:17 AM ET

April 3, 2011

Maybe It's a Bad Joke?

Taken at face value (so to speak), Homans slide show/commentary is daft and dumb. But can he really be SERIOUS? Either way--as dumb history or dead humor--Foreign Policy should have exercised better editorial discretion. (This is a case of one editor's editorial license, I guess.) More alarming, however, is the utter outrage and vitriol of most of the 300+ replies. People of Turkey, my beloved adopted country, Homans' "article" was indeed insulting to Ataturk--but a capital offense? Calm yourselves. Let others believe and write what they wish about Ataturk. Allow your national pride to be expressed as a deep sense of inner security in knowing his true worth as the leader and founding father of modern Turkey. No one can take that away from you.

 

AMADEUS

4:48 AM ET

April 5, 2011

Name given by his people ? Really ?

Quote :
"And we, Turks know the difference between a sultan/khan/king and ATATURK which means "father of the Turks". What a great and lovely name isnt it? And it is given to him by his people, us..." (WHATASHAME)

The name was offered by Agop Martayan.

 

AKKAN

6:26 AM ET

March 31, 2011

Ataturk is not dictator

TO WRITER : Do you really know that What is Ottoman Empire and Turkey's history ? Ataturk is saver of Tukish people . If you write an comment about a country or its symbol you should find infos and searhin to find this infos . Turks are not arabic . Why dont you check dictators of world ,who are Obama or G.W.Bush ?

 

JBROCKLE

8:26 AM ET

March 31, 2011

I think...

you should really look up the definition of dictator. I don't think Ataturk was (though I don't really know/care) but even the most fervently anti-western, mouth frothing nutjob like yourself cannot plausibly argue that either of those two are dictators.

 

AGRICOLA

8:41 AM ET

March 31, 2011

Dictator? You Dick.

I believe the term was "autocratic" in his part of the article, not dictator... though the series does mention dictator.

"Why dont you check dictators of world ,who are Obama or G.W.Bush ?"

That seems like a statement, followed up by a question.

Alright I checked up on the dictators of the world. Dont worry, attaturk is not on the list, he is dead. And by the looks of modern Turkish politics, his secular republic is following suit.

Obama and G.W.Bush are/ were the democratically elected presidents of the united states of America. inb4 "bush was not elected" in fact, yes he was, as the electoral college performed its chief duty perfectly: the system guaranteed that was a winner, thus avoiding a stand off.

Seeing that the blind rage you flew in to I find it twice has hilarious that after saying "If you write an comment about a country or its symbol you should find infos and searhin to find this infos ." you attempt to bash the US for an opinion piece someone threw together before a deadline.

Now i feel even more sorry for million Armenians your people murdered and raped (and the kurds). What did they do to piss you guys off so much? Not say bless you when you sneezed? Calm down there buddy.

 

OZLEM

9:56 AM ET

March 31, 2011

miserables!

you miserable capitalist and murderer american be careful while you are writing 'Turkish'it begins with the capital T. All the world knows that america is a murderer of Afghan people as well as Iraque.. Your assertion about armen?ans doesn't change the reality that Turks in fact didn't do such a thing.. This is just a make up by the despot countries like you..You miserables I pity on you and shame on you.

 

SADRAZAM

10:38 AM ET

March 31, 2011

Dictator or autocrat

Ataturk is indeed no dictator but placing him on top of a list with a title "what is it about the dictators and their mustaches?" probably made by an diaspora Armenian lover is telling all about the intentions.

Ataturk sir, is the only leader of modern human history whom UN have made a declaration about his unprecedented and unique leader characteristics not only for Turkish people but also for whole world. I would recommend you to read about the "Ataturk Centennial" of United Nations to honor the 100th birth day of this charismatic leader in 1981.

By the way, Turks and Armenians have fought for their own interests during WWI. Armenians have chose the sneaky way by murdering thousands of innocent women and children while their men were defending our country against the Russians and the French. Thousands of Armenians have "fought" together with the Russians and the French against their neighbors of 1000 years. They wanted to create a dream land of Armenia to the example of some minor Balkan states as Greece, Bulgaria, Romania etc. Well sir, they have lost big time. But the loss was such unexpected and huge, until today they have not been able to swallow it. That's the reason why we still hear every now and then about their tall talle, the falsified genocide, the so called "Armenian Genocide". I would recommend you to check your sources about their credibility on the subject and study Ataturk a little better.

 

SERHAN

12:10 PM ET

March 31, 2011

To Agricola: Before worrying

To Agricola: Before worrying about Armenians and Kurds, why don`t you look at the Iraqi people who were murdered by some US Soldiers just to have some fun!

 

BILKANK

1:02 PM ET

March 31, 2011

The Greeks The Armenians The

The Greeks The Armenians The Kurds The Araps... They murdered millions of Turks during WWI and after and still you talk about as if it was them that was the victim. The fact that Turkish nation survived is a miracle by itself and person responsible for our survival is Ataturk. How can you make such accusations without knowing what we had to endure during those hellish times. My Grandma still tells stories about how Greeks murdered their neighbors and they had to escape from Crete in overcrawded ships. How can you be on the side of those who caused us so much pain and still lies to the world as if they were the victims? This country is still trying to recover from the damages it received from the war. Turkey was built from zero, it was nearly wiped out by those traitors that we once lived together with and they are blaming us as if it was us that started these hostilities

 

EAGLE

1:36 PM ET

March 31, 2011

to b?lkank

you yold that your mother st?ll tell?ng stor?es about how murdered greeks Can you ask her that why the greeks stab ottoman emp?re from beh?nd wh?th help?ng the england?? and dont forget that turk?sh people murdered nobody.On the other hand dont forget when ottoman emp?re occupancy bizans they let them to believe Isa and they didn t give harm to churchs If we want to k?ll greeks your grandmother has already dead and you can never ever be al?ve

 

GEORG GEORGIAN

1:55 PM ET

March 31, 2011

The big Dictator is Ataturk

Ataturk is the biggest killer of all time. He is number one. Whether he has a mustache or not, does not matter. He is it!

 

ULYTA

2:04 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Lol

Lol another history ''expert'' lets start to discuss about natives than we will go to Asia than Middle east?

And elections i believe you must check about ''elections'' cause hitler elected too also about fairy tales please check www.tallarmeniantale.com.

 

GEORG GEORGIAN

2:12 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Liar

Ataturk is the biggest killer of all time. He is number one. Whether he has a mustache or not, does not matter.
Hitler killed millions of Jews and Ataturk killed also millions of Kurds and Armenians.
Ataturk=Hitler

 

ULYTA

2:52 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Lol

Armenian detected www.tallarmeniantale.com will help you as i said.

 

AGRICOLA

3:08 PM ET

March 31, 2011

@ozlem (lower case o)

Could you rant more and try to throw something in about a Freemason conspiracy or say the word Zionist? While you're being ridiculous, defend your profit (lol) mohamed's choice of bedding a 9 year old. Yeah, that's right your religion put you in the position of defending pedophilia.

Everyone knows turkey slaughtered the Armenians. It's the event that created the word "genocide". Interviews, pictures, etc etc it's all documented. Before that it was just called islamic treatment of non muslims.

I like how u side stepped the Kurd issue. A graceful move.

Ad-hominem aside, my point still stands.

Thank you AND AKKAN for exemplifying why turkey should NOT join the EU. The EU is a union between civilizations. turkey doesnt get to be part of a European organization just because it's own version of Zionism has led it to occupy a Greek city on the European side of the Bosporus for the past 600 years.

 

AGRICOLA

3:21 PM ET

March 31, 2011

@serhan

Alright.

So a few dozen soldiers target civilians, got caught, and now are being prosecuted. They did wrong and we are big enough to figure that out, and punish them. thank God. You're supposing that turkey is justified in the killings of a million Armenians because someone else killed a fraction of that? hardly. The point is 100% valid, turkey committed a huge crime that stains them forever because it was done on purpose and unapologetically.

From what the UN, and world know, most Iraqi deaths occurred from iraqi on iraqi violence in a sectarian blood bath whose roots go back to the pre-british colonial era when Mesopotamia was fought over between the turks and persians. turks slaughtering shia, shia slaughtering sunnis, and both killing kurds.

Al that blood on turkish hands doesn't excuse the legitimate civilian casualties from the iraq war, but perhaps Im being too level headed for you.

 

AGRICOLA

3:24 PM ET

March 31, 2011

@ulyata

I dont think there are any Armenians here. the turks didnt leave enough of them around for one to find his way here.

Nice website. your willingness to grab onto straws while your argument of "it never happened" sinks, should show you how flimsy your position is.

And just b/c im tired of having to mention iraq, im from iceland, so unless u got shit on me there, stay on topic.

 

ULYTA

4:08 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Of course

Sorry but thank you for showin what kind of RETARD you are with calling Istanbul as Greek city and Turks as occupiers.Lets give all world to pagans if we speakin about this right?

Its not about ''civilization'',''EU'',''culture'' not even ''Armenians'' oh first i must enlight you at 1915 Atatürk was an officer at Gallipoli,its all about your sick minds and prejudices.There is no problem when you start rebellion aganist people but cry when you lost a war.

LOL

 

GEORG GEORGIAN

4:15 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Ozlem, Liar

Ataturk is High Criminel, also he is the big Dictator.

 

AGRICOLA

4:18 PM ET

March 31, 2011

@ulyta

Yup. Istanbul is the city of Constantinople which the turks conquered in an aggressive war of expansion, like a zionist to jerusalem, the turk came hungry and ravenous off the plains of asia.

Gallipoli? Man your really grasping for something to feel proud about. That battle does not concern me, but the outcome of defeat for turkey amuses me.

Thank you for your passion, thats about all you're able to bring... besides the sword.

LOL

 

GEORG GEORGIAN

4:21 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Evidence

Ataturk is Dictator
Please click on....

http://rasterast.com/?p=1275

 

ULYTA

4:54 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Ali

Continue beein retard here is JFK speech about Ataturk;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RfCGap0Pic also i wonder which organ you are using when you readin cause i wrote HE WAS OFFICER AT GALLIPOLI

First check this link,especially check nominated from who;

http://nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/nomination/nomination.php?action=show&showid=2046

Check this;

''Atatürk Centennial is declared in 1981 by United Nations and UNESCO. Atatürk is the only person to receive such recognition by UNESCO.''

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atat%C3%BCrk_Centennial

Quotations about Atatürk from Greece

Greece

It is only natural that the two nations are in grief because of the death of the Turkish Chief.

Etnika Nea Newspaper

Our friend Turkey is preparing to pay its final respect to its founder and creator.

Athens-Peria

Before his death, Atatürk has finished his task to create a strong, young and hard working Turkey that is admired and respected by everyone.

Elenikon Mellon Newspaper

We accepted the fact that he was not an ordinary man and that we had not been able to understand his creative power after he threw away the English, the French and the Italian from Anatolia and defeated us.(1938)

Yorgi Pesmazo?lu, Greek Minister of Economics

Each country will make statues of great men that brought victory, well being and happiness to their nation. However, Turkey will have to excavate and look for a distinguished stone in the mountains to carve Atatürk’s statue. Because Turkey had the previlage to have such a distincted leader that all the world looked on in envy and admiration. The death of this great man is not only a loss for Turkey, but for the whole civilized world.

Katimerini-Athens

Atatürk was in search for the roots of the Turks. Turks have always been influenced by the positive or negative theories of foreign historians. Kemal Atatürk has given the Turkish Nation a rank of nobility that all countries in the world would envy. For the forthcoming generations, only his era would be enough for them to be proud of their past.

A. V. Daskalavis, Greek Historian

We, the Royal Government, the Hellenic Nation and I personally share the national mourning of our friend and ally Turkey. Greece has decided to show its deepest sympathy to this noble and friendly nation in their most difficult time. While remembering the Great Chief, the brave soldier and the creator of Turkey in respect, Greece will never forget the fact that President Kemal Atatürk has been the founder of Turkish-Greek peace and cooperation. Greece will always keep the meaningful memory of the Great Deliverer that changed the fate of the noble Turkish Nation.

General Metaksas, Prime Minister of Greece, 1938

“Atatürk’s only feature and fame is not his shiny sword. Things he did in peace expressed the strength of his determination and the brilliance of his ideas. A development such this great has not been achieved since the time of Peter the Great. Atatürk has managed to create a young, strong and determined Turkey that knows where to go in only 16 years.

Akropolis Newspaper

No one has ever done what Atatürk has done in Turkey anywhere. Neither Cavour, nor Cromwell, nor Washington... No one has done what he has done and no one has found what he has found. The new generation that he created according to his principles will surely continue in his path.

Tipos Newspaper

Plutarque has written the biographies of many heros in history. He believes the greatest success and happiness a man can ever reach in life is to be remembered by other nations of the world in respect and mourning at the time of death and he states that this has been achieved by only a few men in ancient history. Had Atatürk lived before the time of Plutarque, we would definitely be among those happy people. The Turkish Nation has cried for the days for Atatürk like a real father who had given life or actually given back life. Being loved and mourned after this much is an exception in the nations' history of the world.

Athinaika, Athens, 12th November 1938

You are from Iceland right?also Iceland part of Denmark

Denmark

Atatürk has passed away on duty while in the prime of life. However, his remains will take their place on the pages of history as the legend of bravery. He has created his masterpiece as a warrior and a statesman. Unlike most leaders keeping their ruling positions by sword, he has put away his sword after he won the victory. One should clearly understand his deeds: A demolished state, a corrupt army, a desperate nation without hope!

Yet, after defeating all armies opposing him, Atatürk has dictated the national Turkish State to those he defeated at Lausanne in 1923. Atatürk had realised the fact that he had much more important missions after he had defined the borders of his state. He has left behind a westernized modern state.

The understanding of wearing a hat and leaving behind the Arabic alphabet to use the new Turkish alphabet, for which he has personally teached, may be seen as ordinary things. However, these are the most important features of the new state’s policy of peace compared to the former warrior spirit of the Turks. Atatürk has solved the problems of Montreaux and Hatay, entered on an energetic reformist action, created industry and railroads.

Berlinske Tidence Newspaper

The leader of Turkey, Atatürk, has accomplished the unexpected and created a strong country out of Turkey, known as the “Sick Man”.

Social Demokraten Newspaper

Atatürk was the gigantic symbol of personality and talent. He was the man who created the most extraordinary occasion of the twentieth century. He transformed the semi eastern, Caliph oriented, religion powered nation into a modern, secular and national state. This meant leaving oriental and spiritual symbolic roots behind to achieve radical developments.

Atatürk’s foreign policy will remain as an example in history. He made friendly aggreements to sort out foreign debts, reconstructed the channel’s matters and solved Hatay problem without entering a war.

Within many reformist movements, Atatürk has gained a new standard of life to the Workers and has left behind a strong Turkey that will always follow his footsteps.

National Tidende Newspaper

Atatürk’s masterpiece will remain in history forever.

Denmark

The man who created the most glamorous occasion of the twentieth century.

National Tidence Newspaper

From USA

United States of America

I am proud to attend to the 25th Anniversary of the Memorial Ceremony of Atatürk’s death. Atatürk reminds us of many things. The historical success of great leaders of this century, leadership that inspires the Turkish Nation, the supreme vision of the modern world, and as a soldier, high determination and bravery.

The birth of the Turkish Nation from the ruins of a collapsing empire, New Turkey’s decleration of its freedom and independance in honour and protecting it since then are the work of Atatürk and his Nation. There is no doubt that the revolutions he has carried out in his country shows how the trust of a nation brings success. There is no other example like this.

John F. Kennedy, President of U.S.A. 10th November 1963

I am sorry in two ways. First of all, I, like all the world, am sorry for such a great man to pass away. Secondly, no matter how much I wanted to get to know him personally, it is now impossible for me to do that.

Franklin ROOSVELT, President of U.S.A. 10th November 1963

He was one of the greatest leaders of our age as a soldier and as a statesman. He has made Turkey take its deserved place among the most developed countries of the world. He has given the Turks the feelings of confidence and endurance. I am proud of myself for being one of Atatürk’s loyal friends.

McARTHUR, General

“I have just received the news about Kemal. Someone who knew him personally has passed me the news. While I was in discussion with the Soviet Russian Minister of Foreign affairs Litvinof about the recognition of the Soviet Socialist Government, I had asked who was the most remarkable statesman of Europe for him. He answered promptly saying that the most remarkable stasetman of Europe didn’t live in Europe; this statesman was definitely Mustafa Kemal, the President of Turkish Republic.”

Hearing this from a brilliant statesman like Litvinof, who I believe is the most remarkable one of his kind after Disraeli who was once in charge of the United Kingdom, I thought these words were of great importance.

Franklin D. Rooswelt, President of U.S.A., 1928

“Dinner parties given to a hundred people were no different than the ones given in European capitals. However, the ones given in the Turkish Republic made them more glamourous compared to the Europeans' because of the solid gold tableware used that were the remainings of 2nd Mahmut (1808-1839). Apart from all, Mustafa Kemal is a serious warrior. He is strong, confident, thoughtful, hard and straightforward. However, on that night, he was a kind and gentle statesman as well as a perfect President. Every Ambassador that night felt honoured to be there with him.”

General Charles Sherill, Former Ambassador of U.S.A. to Ankara, Turkey

It should not be forgotten that Kemal has shown a brilliant strategy at Dumlup?nar and has succeeded in making use of the Turkish forces that were less in number.

What the Greek army faced is an exceptionally rare defeat that only a few occupying armies have witnessed in history.

General Charles Sherill, Former Ambassador of U.S.A.

He won Lausanne; the first victory Old Asia has won over Europe win in two centuries.

New York Times

One of the most attentive and attractive men has passed away from the stage of the world.

Chicago Tribune

He was one of the most talented leaders of the post war period.

New York Times

There is a proof of perfect leadership in his dominant eyes. His thick eyebrows never stay still. They rise to high, intellectual peaks and get crossed suddenly to form indescribable cracks on his forehead. He has a fare skin, tanned. He is not a brunette. His hair is blondish brown. The clean cut features of his mouth and chin show his certainity in his decisions. He is always alert, straightforward and very intelligent.

Gladys Baker, American Journalist

The American Government is in a deep sorrow because of Atatürk’s death. This sorrow is not limited to the Turkish Nation and their borders. It expands widely.

Kordel HALL, Secretary of State, U.S.A.

This Turkish man, admired by the whole world, has made the Turkish people proud of themselves, their history and their language. For the future of his nation, he has generated such a great power that has not been generated in the past several centuries.

General C. H. SHERILL, Former American Ambassador

Mustafa Kemal has achieved success mainly because of his endless patience.

Charles H. SHERILL, Former American Ambassador

Atatürk’s devotion to his country was highly respected by the whole world.

F. D. ROOSVELT, President of the U.S.A.

America admires the determination, courage and the results of Atatürk’s deeds that many people can never achieve.

American Press

from UK

United Kingdom

He was one of the leading characters of the post war period. He formed a class individually and mostly he was unique.

The Fortnightiy, London

Europe has lost one of the few creative post war statesmen that appeared on the scene.

Spectator, England

He added an exceptional energy and an intellectual radicalism to his merciless power and huge ambition. He never got influenced by historical traditions and religious sentimantalism. He always balanced them with his mature policies.

The Times, London

No name in this age has gained such reputation as the name Atatürk.

Observer, London

Turkey was once believed to be an unnecessary member of Europe but under the leadership of Atatürk it became a valuable and revolutionary member of local policy.

Times Newspaper, England

The most gentleman, dependable and friendly statesman of the era is Atatürk.

English Press

If the dictators and the democrats of this age were to be gifted like Atatürk, the world wouldn't have been seperated into two.

England

Atatürk was the living example of dignity and honour in a world where these two values are only remembered in words.

England

Everyone is crying for the death of Atatürk. His life will always be remembered as a great statesman, a great soldier, a great man of dignity and honour. England salutes this great man whom at first was a brave and noble enemy, then a loyal friend.

Sunday Times, London

He was a totally exceptional statesman. He has done things that dictators can never tolerate, even the democracies cannot realise or have not realised. Such men in history have always given their names to eras. They are really exceptional.

Word Price

No civilized name can create such respect as the name Atatürk. Atatürk is not only a man that changed the life of Turkey, but is also a man who has done only good things in the international arena.

The Observer, England

Kemalist Turkey has shown all the world how to get into its well deserved honoured place among the leading countries of the world by strong national economic policies.

The Financial Times, England

The Turkish Reform lead by him personally has brought a free and confident life to the men and women of his nation that no other generation in the history of Turkey had ever achieved. His success made Turkey a European country and changed the history of the near east.

Times Newspaper, England

The death of Atatürk, who saved Turkey in the war and resurrected the Turkish Nation after the war, is a great loss not only for his country but also for all of Europe. The tears of people from all classes in the country are nothing but the proof of respect of the brave and modern Turkey for its leader.(1938)

Winston CHURCHILL, Prime Minister of England

Atatürk was a leader in the spirit of the Turkish Nation that resembled the national flag.

Daily Telegraph, England

Kemal Atatürk, the President of the Turkish Republic, carries some features that we are not used to seing in other leaders; modesty, capability and success...

The Truth, English Magazine

The presence of that young and ingenious Turkish Leader at Dardanella was probably the most unfortunate occasion for the allied forces.

Alan Moorehead, English Author

It is necesary to explain the reality in the battlefields at Dardanella. We are now trying to resist the brave Turkish Army, lead by a brave and clever commander.

Hamilton, English General

Our generation has witnessed many strong men gaining power to lead their countries.

But if studied carefully, it will be seen that none of the reforms generated by other nations and states are as well considered as the ones generated by Atatürk.

Daily Telegraph, England

Atatürk is a fresh and a brave leader because he did not get involved with the beliefs of old. We can say that he is the most powerful statesman of Europe today and there is no doubt that he is the most corageous and original statesman of all.

Herbert Sideabotham, English Author

The death of Atatürk, who saved Turkey, leaded and elevated the Turkish Nation, is a great loss for both Turkish Nation and for Europe. The teardrops of the men and women from all social classes of his country are the well deserved proof of the good and right deeds this great man has done in his life.

Sir Winston Churchill, Prime Minister of the UK

To understand every incident in detail and the ability to decide and react immediately were the main sources of his unique authority.(1923)

Grace Ellison, English Journalist

Below are the words of the English Prime Minister Lloyd George, known as a Turkish enemy, while he answered the accusations and criticism in the English Parliament for the retreat of the British Army from Anatolia in 1922: “Dear Sirs, you may see an exceptional genius in centuries. It is very unfortunate for us that the great genius of this era came up from the Turkish Nation. There was nothing to be done against the brilliance of Mustafa Kemal.”

Lloyd George, Prime Minister of the UK

The foreign policy of Turkey designed by Atatürk has put Turkey among western nations and old enemies have become friends.

Times Newspaper, England

His resistance at Galippoli peninsula in WW I and his ingenious struggle in the War of Independence has brought him glamorous victories.

He has managed to cope with unexpected difficulties and misfortunes with the help of his high spirit and patience.

The Times, England

I commemorate Mustafa Kemal Atatürk on his 25th death anniversary with deep respect. Atatürk’s name was known in our country 50 years ago as a brilliant Turkish military commander. After peace was maintained we had the chance to meet him as the Atatürk with his statist features that has put him among the great national leaders in history.

Today, Turkey is in partnership with England in Western unity. England and Turkey share the same general policies and are in contact in various fields. This is mainly a result of the deeds of Atatürk.

On the 25th death anniversary, I respect him as a brave soldier and as the Father of modern Turkey. We will always remember him as a satatesman in admiration and in respect.

Sir A. Douglas Hume

Some people regarded Atatürk as a dictator. I say this is wrong and such a thought will lead you on a wrong path. Although the term dictator is well suited to Hitler and Mussolini, actually there is no definition of a dictator. In this case, one may ask, why do you put Atatürk aside from this term.

I have many reasons. First of all, Atatürk was leading a scientific study for the times that he would not exist. His intention was to develop a governmental and constitutional system that would operate after him. He never forced his people to believe in his vision. Instead, he tried to teach and explain his ideals to them. He had taken the decisive power of his nation from the Great National Assembly at the time of the War of Independence while he was planning the future with his friends. The members of the Assembly were elected by the people. The President was elected every four years and the Assembly had the power to rule as well as the power to pass laws. Atatürk’s respect for the Great National Assembly is important. His main concern with the interior affairs was to create a living political organism with the capability to react promptly to situations that might arise.

If he were alive, I suppose that he would refuse to be a candidate for the Presidency and stay aside to observe if the mechanism would function as well as he wanted it to. I am not sure if his friends would accept this, though.

Sir Percy Loraine, UK Ambassador

Atatürk’s reform will be continuous. Because this reform has enabled Turkey to change completely after the war and this strong nation has no enemies anymore. This is something no other human being has ever achieved in our time.

Vernon Barlett

Today, Turkey is a big and a new country. This new Turkey had found itself in the personality of Atatürk after the treachery, misery and the wearinessof the war. He gave life to this new Turkey.

Daily Mail

“The Greatest Man of History”

One of the most popular papers of England states that Atatürk is the greatest man of our era and history. It also mentions that his value cannot be compared to any other great personality in history.

While mentioning Atatürk, the paper gives examples from various eras and some distinctive characters remembered in those times and states that Atatürk can never be compared with them, being a great reformer, a great soldier and a great statesman. The paper reads, in order assess Atatürk, it is not enough to follow his way. One has to be as clever as he is and has to make decisions as fast and correct as he does.

The paper states that no other great man in history has ever achieved the privilage to rise to his level.

English Press, London

from FRANCE

France

Atatürk is a good man with a good heart. The Turkish Nation sees itself in his personality.

One can easily see the characteristics of humanity in him.

Nouvelle Newspaper

If he has won the war and he is more to win, he will also make peace. Believe my words and let me tell you that he will succeed. He will do good and perfectly so, he will achieve a great success that no-one has ever achieved.

Claude FARRERE, French Author

Atatürk’s distinctive creativity appears when he proceeds his energetic work with delicacy even after the danger is far removed. He manages to give an irresistable attraction to every move he makes. It is impossible to explain this with logic. This is his personal talent.

Maurice Pernot, French Journalist

One of the most exceptional events of this era is the establishment of a national Turkish State while the Ottoman Empire disappears like a ghost. Mustafa Kemal has done something great. The victory of Turkish nationalism has effected Asia and Kemalism has influenced all countries fighting for freedom.

Maurice BAUMANT, French Professor

He was a great man ... He was a political genius.

Excelsior Newspaper

One day he told me that there are small nations depending on very strong countries. He said that the future belongs to those small nations rather than the strong countries. I kept his words in mind. Because, these words reflect the deep meaning of the success of Atatürk, who was known as the most dependable, alert and clever man of the near East before his death.

A French Journalist

At this moment, I share the deep sorrow of Turkey because of the loss of the great nationalist and great statesman who devoted all his life to the freedom of his country. His mission, both within blood and peace, will pass to all nations that are in sincere relation with the Turkish Nation. The French Nation feels sorrow for this loss that the Turkish Republic faces today.

Alber LEBRUN, French President

Kemal Atatürk is an idealist. The reason he has managed to do great things is, he has always kept principles and has managed to limit his passion.

?arl De ?ambron, French Diplomat

He was one of the greatest men of the era.

Le Jour-Echo de Paris

The Turks, known as the most loyal nation, will never forget that Atatürk was the deliverer of his country.

Noell Roger, French Newspaper

The great man that stood in front of me was some mysterious talent and character that I had explored, there was no doubt in his words.

Claude Farrer, French Author

Old Turkey had been under domain for centuries, yet, it awakened with his efforts and glamoured with his reforms.

Jean Laubespin, French Journalist

Turks of today have reached their position that had frightened Europe centuries ago. The Turkey that waits in silence with his death is a strong and ripened Turkey.

Pierre Dominique, French Journalist

The man beyond centuries!...

Paris, French Press

He had sharp looks that sparkled suddenly. His strong character and his speed of understanding shows itself in the movement of his hands. The bright tone of his voice shone like the steel.

Mustafa Kemal is really a young, neat man believing that was born to rule his nation.

Mme. B. G. Gualis, French Journalist

The masterpiece he has created in wisdom and peace will leave its trace in the histories of the peoples.

Albert LEBRUN, French President

He has won all the ranks of a country in which he has abolished every rank. The most honourable name that could ever be given to someone in his country was given to him.

Mercel Sauvage, French Journalist

Kemalism invented the fast path to development and has proved that even with one generation of disciplinary education, a great populist civilization can be developed.This can be proposed to mankind as an experimental example of philosophy. Kemalism has terminated things that could normally be achieved only in centuries.

Gerrard Tongas, French Author

Atatürk has died. The east column of the peace temple went down. No one can guarantee peace in the universe anymore. The European statesmen did not listen to his warnings and advice in 1930 and lead the world to disaster in the second great war in 1939.

SANERWIN, French Newspaper

He had closed his steel blue eyes to the beautiful light of nature, he was supernatural. Figaro, Paris Atatürk has managed to create the miracle to immortalize a nation in a couple of years.

Le Temps, Paris

The answer the French Prime Minister gave to those who said “He stabbed us from the back, he agreed with the bandits of the mountains, he agreed with those like Mustafa Kemal” after the Ankara Treaty:

“If that brave man Mustafa Kemal and his brave soldiers were here, instead of naming them the bandits of the mountains, we would put statues of them in every square. I am proud to sign such a brave agreement.” (1921)

BRIAND, French Prime Minister

We have seen the blessings and success of the democracy spirit only with Atatürk. France

He was a revolutionary and a rebel at first, then he became “the father of the Turks” as a victorious commander and created the New Turkey. He cast out the Sultans, gave freedom to women and realised a radical reform in his country.

From Paris-Soir

Just a glance from the Father of the Turks will be enough to his loyal nation.

Noelle Roger, French Newspaper

It can clearly be said that the world of Islam was to wait for at least another fifty years.

Berthe Georges-Gaulis

Thousands of Arabs that gathered in Jerusalem are shouting “Long Live Mustafa Kemal Pasha” to the heavens bravely although there are machine guns located at minarets and towers and there are English soldiers in armed vehicles surrounding them.

Pierre Benoit

Mustafa Kemal walked a few steps. The commander of the 19th Division stayed put for about a minute between the two armies. Then, slowly he began raising his right arm and walked towards the enemy front.

The Turkish Infantry leaped out of their positions shouting “Allah, Allah”. They managed to defeat two English Battalions. North Lancashire Battalion was in a shock and was forced to retreat. Wiltshire Battalion died under bayonets. The Turks came down the slope in an irresistable attack. They threw the enemy, including the New Zeland soldiers, to the sea.

Benoist-Mechin, French Statesman

Young Turkey has accompanied Europe with her interest in and attention to science.

There is not one thing missing to force us to salute him in the name of civilization.

Edouard HERRIO, Former French Prime Minister

You can not appreciate him enough. You can not value his greatness. He resembles a giant mountain. Those living next to it can not realise how great it is. One has to look at it from a far distance inorder to understand its greatness.

Klod FARER, French Author

This revolution belongs to Mustafa Kemal, an extraordinary distinctive man. I have lived around him for five years and had the chance to gain his friendship. I used to notice that Atatürk was sometimes happy, talkative, anxious and always far from desires and assumptions... When I got in, he was on foot. He wore a nice suit. I talked. When he realised that I had memorized the things I was saying, he left the paper he was holding and answered me in Turkish instantly. His personality was attractive, like magic. He used to gaze far away and the moment they were locked on you, his eyes would calm down. He was blond, his hair framed a determined forehead. He had a strong, muscular body that resisted the heat of the deserts and the glaciers of the high mountains. He had broad shoulders that could carry all sorts of responsibilities. He was born to accept victory.

Ch. De CHAMBRUN, Former French Ambassador to Ankara

I would like to express the feelings of loyal friendship of the French Nation to the Turkish Nation on the 25th Anniversary of the death of Great Atatürk. Today, Turkish history is linked to the Western and European history. The efforts of Atatürk have made this possible. The friendship of our countries for centuries is one of the basic characteristics of this improvement.

Charles De GAULLE

Whenever we read about the life of an important diplomat or a great commander in history, we take pleasure of imagining his face, words or his impressions and we say, “How I wish I knew him”.

There is no doubt that our children will think alike when they learn about the exciting life of the great soldier and revolutionist Kemal Atatürk who directed the future of today's Turkey. He had stayed in dungeons for weeks because he was a reformist. He won the freedom of his country while he was the commander. He decided for the Republic and constructed its establishments while he was the State President. His life is exciting for sure. ... However, I would like to remind an important issue concerning Kemal Atatürk’s personality. He was telling us about the war. All of a sudden he stopped and said:

- As you see I have lots of victories. Still, I feel the pain and sorrow for the soldiers who died on the battlefield every night. Because of the heart he has, apart from his courage and sharp mind, the miracle he has created for his country is never surprising.

George BENNES, Paris Vu Newspaper, 1938

High personalities of the era had announced in their books and at conferences that Turkey would never have the chance to transform and that it would die. However, it transformed and didn’t die. And it changed completely. Beliefs, traditions and styles went down. The last traces of them were thrown out of the country just like the enemy battleships and their capitulations. Turkey had changed her spirit. Completely and as far as one can imagine...

How did this happen?

Simply, a man passed by. A man of middle height, walking ordinarily, yet, with sharp eyes with sharp looks.

His name was Mustafa Kemal.

Raymond CARTIER, Le Nouvelliste Newspaper, Paris, 1938

Etc.

Thank you for showing us what kind of IGNORANT you are.

 

TURK

4:58 PM ET

March 31, 2011

AGRICOLA

Looks like you are so interesting phedophilia and it seems you only read this. Are you interesting ? EU has many travel companies only for this, you can join.

Additionaly who fuck you from Turkey ? looks like you have strong pain.

 

SAADETTOKER

5:04 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Ataturk

You are so ignorant because you do not even know most of the people who attacked Armenians in that region were Kurds. Before putting any hateful comments, study your history. Maybe you will also find out about the Turks who have been killed by Armenians,too.

 

SAADETTOKER

5:14 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Ataturk

For your information,Galipoli war was not a defeat for Turks, after that war most of the invaders pulled out of Tukey. It is time for you to study history again and also to learn to be objective and try to get rid of your negative feelings. We do not need more hatred in today's world.

 

AGRICOLA

5:27 PM ET

March 31, 2011

@ulyta

Me: "Alright I checked up on the dictators of the world. Dont worry, attaturk is not on the list" from earlier.

I said nothing about ataturk, even then quoting only PRAISE of the man without the criticism, is hardly definitive. I guess the turkish propaganda sites dont have criticism on their blogs... So seeing as i agreed ataturk was not a dictator, and that you didnt go against any of the other points i mentioned, but diverted the discussion to attaturk looks like u concede my points, while wasting your time.

 

AGRICOLA

5:29 PM ET

March 31, 2011

@Turk

Ah this tactic.

The only "interest" in pedophilia I have is to stop it. Nice attempt at a smear.

Seeing as how I pointed out the the profit (lol) of islam was a pedophile, it's only the natural response for you to attack the messenger (me in this case). Nice attempt at an argument, and english.

 

EMIP

5:52 PM ET

March 31, 2011

It's Not Your Fault Agricola

@AGRICOLA

You wrote "And just b/c im tired of having to mention iraq, im from iceland, so unless u got shit on me there, stay on topic."

As a matter of fact scientific studies (see link) have shown a genetic linkage to manic depression in Iceland: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1294094/

So when you get back on your meds and stop your ranting, you and other similar commentators of all nationalities spouting insults in this thread would do well to remember this old adage: HATRED BEGETS HATRED!

As regards the Armenian issue, I think few Turks today deny that countless deaths of Armenians took place not only because of massacres but due to disease, starvation and exhaustion during their forced relocation from the Eastern front when the Ottoman Empire was fighting for its survival during WW1. From what I have read, the Turks primarily object to:

1- It's designation as genocide (i.e. the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political or cultural group) in the absence of any official documents or testimony showing that the Sultan or his government ordered such a policy. This is further borne out by the fact that none of the hundreds of thousands of Armenians living in large Turkish cities such as Constantinople (now Istanbul) away from the front lines at the time were not deported. If there was indeed intent to exterminate the Armenians as a people (i.e. to commit genocide), common sense would suggest they would certainly have been included.

Moreover, you may or may not be aware that following the defeat of the Ottoman Empire at the end of WW1, the victorious British took 141 of the top Ottoman leaders and generals into custody and transferred them to the island of Malta to be tried for war crimes. Yet, every single one of them was subsequently released due to lack of proof that they issued any such orders.

2- The fact that equally horrible massacres of Turks and other Muslim groups such as the Kurds by the Armenians during this same time period are totally overlooked.

Since you don’t like the facts contained in the website suggested by commentator ulyta, perhaps you might want to spend a few minutes reading the following research paper written by Rachel Carson listed on the Armenian Genocide Debate website: http://www.armeniangenocidedebate.com/truth-behind-armenian-tragedy-rachel-salomon

A tragic aside you will find out in so doing, is that some of the Armenian massacres were in fact also carried out by the Kurds, whom you are now touting.

One last thought, you comment about Turkey seeking admission into the European Union; perhaps it might interest you to know that according to the latest poll conducted on the subject, 60% of the Turks polled were against EU accession: http://www.bne.eu/blob.php?id=229169&m=a647896cb3a0cbeb954fee5163144059

And why should they want to join? Turkey had the highest economic growth among all the European countries in 2010! Check it out for yourself: http://www.novinite.com/view_news.php?id=126828

Soon, it might be the EU that comes to Turkey looking for a loan because of their PIIGS (Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece & Spain) :-))

 

GARY1

5:57 PM ET

March 31, 2011

ATATURK is not a killer

If you check history(which i think you bit thick) ATATURK respected all foreign countries specially Greeks. Trust me greece spent more than 70% for their military. You know why they are scared from us. Armenian stupids why dont you help your countrie. They are suffering you american killing them more. They suffering from you. Their economie going no where. Just check history Ataturk has always been a greatest leader. Today americans killing more than 2nd world war. Why dont you put your cock against them. Ataturk dead now. Be respectfull. And finally before you putting any comment at leat google it

 

DRSKOKSAL

6:07 PM ET

March 31, 2011

 

EMIP

6:15 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Corrigendum

In my comment above I referred to the author of a research article on the Armenian issue as "Rachel Carson". It should have been Rachel Salomon. My environmentalist side took over for a moment.

 

ATAM1

5:43 AM ET

April 1, 2011

and you are the biggest full or ignorant

because you think you're right does not mean you're right.
The approach "I have said so it must be true", explain your brain capability of your ability to learn

 

GENERALDUNCAN

7:38 AM ET

April 1, 2011

agricola, we're sorry

cause we missed your mother during the great war.

how dare you blame turkish nation for raping armenians and kurds? don't you know a single thing about history? don't you know armenians were armed by the russians and the french? don't you know armenian gangs attacked turkish-kurdish villages and slaughtered innocent people? get a job, loser. go read some unbiased history books, not propaganda books funded by the armenian community who are backed by french and american governments who had once wanted to govern throughout anatolia but was kicked in the as* by Mustafa Kemal Ataturk. they learned their lesson then and will succumb again if they repeat the same mistake.

i think you better go on sleeping with those armenian fag**ts who had already been punished because of his deeds in the past. you know nothing.

 

SEVGIS

8:55 AM ET

April 1, 2011

ignorant

Georg Georgian and similar people seems very ignorant. Ataturk was not the president in the World War I. He was just an officer in Ottoman Army and fought in the places very far away from Armenian people like Çanakkale, North Africa. So he has no reletionship and responsibility for Armenian people. He did not killed Kurdish people as they Kurds when he was the president of republic. He founded a secular government and some radical Islam?st Kurds (Said Nursi & others) rebelled against republic. And also some Islamist fundalist rebelled in Aegean side of Anatolia. They were not Kurds but fundemental Islamist. Ataturk never killed people becoming Kurd, or Arab, or Armenian. He founded a modern republic and he just made war for protection of republic.

 

ALPERDEM

10:33 AM ET

April 1, 2011

:D. what a subnormal person

:D. what a subnormal person you are.

 

ALPERDEM

10:37 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Unethical

And we don't care whether you care "who is Atatürk" or not. If you do not care, then do not write his name, please.

 

ALPERDEM

10:43 AM ET

April 1, 2011

TO JBROCKLE

And we don't care whether you care "who is Atatürk" or not. If you do not care, then do not write his name, please.

 

ALPERDEM

10:46 AM ET

April 1, 2011

TO GEORG GEORGIAN

:D. what a subnormal person you are.

 

CENGAW

11:49 AM ET

April 1, 2011

please read to learn

[close]

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
"Atatürk" redirects here. For other uses, see Atatürk (disambiguation).
Page semi-protected
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk

President Atatürk
1st President of Turkey
In office
29 October 1923 – 10 November 1938
(&000000000000001500000015 years, &000000000000001200000012 days)
Prime Minister Ali Fethi Okyar
?smet ?nönü
Celâl Bayar
Succeeded by ?smet ?nönü
1st Prime Minister of Turkey
In office
3 May 1920 – 24 January 1921
(&00000000000000000000000 years, &0000000000000266000000266 days)
Succeeded by Fevzi Çakmak
1st Speaker of the Parliament of Turkey
In office
24 April 1920 – 29 October 1923
(&00000000000000030000003 years, &0000000000000219000000219 days)
Succeeded by Ali Fethi Okyar
1st Leader of the Republican People's Party
In office
9 September 1923 – 10 November 1938
(&000000000000001500000015 years, &000000000000006200000062 days)
Succeeded by ?smet ?nönü
Born indeterminate 1881 (the date 19 May 1881 was used for official purposes, but there is no certainty he was born on this day)
Selânik, Ottoman Empire (present-day Thessaloniki, Greece)
Died 10 November 1938(1938-11-10) (aged 57)
Dolmabahçe Palace
Istanbul, Turkey
Resting place An?tkabir
Ankara, Turkey
Nationality Turkish
Political party Committee of Union and Progress, Republican People's Party
Spouse(s) Lâtife U?akl?gil (1923–25)
Religion See Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's religious views.
Signature
Military service
Allegiance Ottoman Empire
(1893 – 8 July 1919)
Republic of Turkey
(9 July 1919 – 30 June 1927)
Service/branch Army
Rank Ottoman Empire: General (Pasha)
Republic of Turkey: Mare?al (Marshal)
Commands 19th Division – 16th Corps – 2nd Army – 7th Army – Yildirim Army Group – commander-in-chief of Army of the Government of the Grand National Assembly
Battles/wars Tobruk – Anzac Cove – Chunuk Bair – Scimitar Hill – Sari Bair – Bitlis – Sakarya – Dumlup?nar
Awards List (24 medals)
External Timeline
Graphical Timeline
Detailed Chronology
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (series)
Personal life Birth date · Name · Early life (Education) · Family · Character · Religious beliefs · Will · Publications
Military career Early period · Gallipoli · Caucasus · Sinai and Palestine
Independence War Establishment · Conflicts · Peace
Atatürk's Reforms & Kemalist ideology
Gallery: Picture, Sound, Video
Unbalanced scales.svg
The neutrality of this article is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved. (February 2011)

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (Turkish pronunciation: [mus?tafa ce?mal ata?ty?k]; indeterminate, 1881–10 November 1938) was an Ottoman and Turkish army officer, revolutionary statesman, writer, and the first President of Turkey. He is credited with being the founder of the modern Turkish state.

Atatürk was a military officer during World War I.[1] Following the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in World War I, he led the Turkish national movement in the Turkish War of Independence. Having established a provisional government in Ankara, he defeated the forces sent by the Allies. His military campaigns gained Turkey independence. Atatürk then embarked upon a program of political, economic, and cultural reforms, seeking to transform the former Ottoman Empire into a modern, westernized and secular nation-state. The principles of Atatürk's reforms, upon which modern Turkey was established, are referred to as Kemalism.
Contents
[hide]

* 1 Early life
* 2 Military career
o 2.1 Early years
o 2.2 Italo-Turkish War (1911–1912)
o 2.3 Balkan Wars (1912–1913)
o 2.4 First World War (1914–1918)
o 2.5 Turkish War of Independence (1919–1922)
* 3 Establishment of the Republic of Turkey
* 4 Presidency
o 4.1 Domestic policies
+ 4.1.1 Emergence of the state, 1923–1924
+ 4.1.2 Civic independence and the Caliphate, 1924–1925
+ 4.1.3 Opposition to Kemal in 1924–1927
+ 4.1.4 Modernization efforts, 1926–1930
+ 4.1.5 Opposition to Kemal in 1930–1931
+ 4.1.6 Modernization efforts, 1931–1938
o 4.2 Foreign policies
+ 4.2.1 Issue of Mosul
+ 4.2.2 Relations with the RSFSR/Soviet Union
+ 4.2.3 Turkish-Greek alliance
+ 4.2.4 Neighbours to the east
+ 4.2.5 Turkish Straits
+ 4.2.6 Balkan Pact
+ 4.2.7 Issue of Hatay
o 4.3 Economic policies
+ 4.3.1 State intervention, 1923–1929
+ 4.3.2 Great Depression, 1929–1931
+ 4.3.3 Liberalization and planned growth, 1931–1939
* 5 Personal life
* 6 Legacy
o 6.1 Turkey
+ 6.1.1 Outlawing insults to his reminiscence
o 6.2 Worldwide
* 7 See also
* 8 Notes
* 9 References
* 10 External links

Early life
Main article: Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's personal life

Mustafa was born in either the Ahmed Suba?? neighbourhood or the Islahhane Street (present-day Apostolu Pavlu Street) in the Koca Kas?m Pasha neighbourhood (this house is preserved as a museum) in Selânik,[2] Ottoman Empire, to his mother Zübeyde Han?m (a housewife) and father Ali R?za Efendi (a militia officer, title deed clerk and lumber trader.) Only one of Atatürk's siblings, a sister named Makbule (Atadan) survived childhood; she died in 1956.[3] According to Andrew Mango, he was born into a family which was Muslim, Turkish-speaking and precariously middle-class.[4] Time magazine states that Mustafa Kemal's father was of Albanian and his mother was of Macedonian origin,[5] and Patrick Kinross wrote that he was "as fair as any Slav from beyond the Bulgarian frontier" with "fine white skin" and "eyes of a deep but clear light blue."[6] According to Encyclopaedia Judaica, one assertion that was commonly made by many Jews of Salonika was that Kemal Atatürk was of Doenmeh origin. This view was eagerly embraced by many of Atatürk’s religious opponents and denied by the Turkish government.[7] His father Ali R?za is thought to be of Albanian origin;[8][9][10][11][12] however, according to Falih R?fk? Atay, Ali R?za's ancestors were from Söke in the Ayd?n Province of Anatolia.[13][14] His mother Zübeyde is thought to be of Turkish origin[10][11] and according to ?evket Süreyya Aydemir, she was of Yörük Türkmen ancestry.[15]

Born Mustafa, his second name Kemal (meaning Perfection or Maturity) was given to him by his Mathematics teacher, Captain Üsküplü Mustafa Efendi, according to Afet Inan in admiration of his capability and maturity,[16][17] and according to Ali Fuat Cebesoy, because his teacher Mustafa Efendi wanted to distinguish his student who carried the same name with him,[18] although his biographer Andrew Mango suggests that he may have chosen the name himself as a tribute to the nationalist poet Nam?k Kemal.[19] In his early years, his mother encouraged Mustafa to attend a religious school, something he did reluctantly and only briefly. Later, he attended the ?emsi Efendi School (a private school with a more secular curriculum) at the direction of his father. His parents wanted him to learn a trade, but without consulting them, Atatürk took the entrance exam for a military junior high school in the Ottoman city of Selânik (Salonika, modern Thessaloniki in Greece) in 1893. In 1896, he enrolled into a military high school in the Ottoman city of Manast?r (modern Bitola, Macedonia). On March 14, 1899,[20] he enrolled at the War College in the neighbourhood of Pangalt?[21] within the ?i?li district of the Ottoman capital city Constantinople[22] (modern Istanbul in Turkey) and graduated in 1902. He later graduated from the Military Staff College in Constantinople on 11 January 1905.[20]
Military career
Main article: Military career of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
Early years
See also: Vatan ve Hürriyet, Committee of Union and Progress, and Young Turk Revolution
Mustafa Kemal as a Senior Captain (Kola?as?) in 1907.

Following graduation, he was assigned to the Fifth Army based in Damascus as a Staff Captain[20] in the company of Ali Fuat (Cebesoy) and Müfit (Özde?).[23] He joined a small secret revolutionary society of reformist officers led by Mustafa (Cantekin) called Vatan ve Hürriyet ("Motherland and Liberty"). On June 20, 1907, he was promoted to the rank of Senior Captain (Kola?as?) and on October 13, 1907, assigned to the headquarters of the Third Army in Manast?r.[24] He joined the Committee of Union and Progress, with membership number 322, although in later years he became known for his opposition to, and frequent criticism of, the policies pursued by the CUP leadership. On June 22, 1908, he was appointed the Inspector of the Ottoman Railways in Eastern Rumelia (Do?u Rumeli Bölgesi Demiryollar? Müfetti?i).[24] In July 1908, he played a role in the Young Turk Revolution which seized power from Sultan Abdülhamid II and restored the constitutional monarchy.

In 1910 he was called to the Ottoman provinces in Albania.[25][26] At that time Isa Boletini was leading Albanian uprisings in Kosovo and there were revolts in Albania.[27][28] In 1910 he met with Eqerem Vlora.[29][30]

Later, in the autumn of 1910, he was among the Ottoman military observers who attended the Picardie army manoeuvres in France.[31]

In early 1911, he worked at the Ministry of War (Harbiye Nezareti) headquarters in Istanbul for a short time.
Italo-Turkish War (1911–1912)
Main article: Italo-Turkish War
See also: Battle of Tobruk (1911)
Binba?? Mustafa Kemal Bey (left) with a Turkish military officer and Bedouin forces in Darnah, Tripolitania Vilayet, 1912.

Later in 1911, he was assigned to the Ottoman Tripolitania Vilayet (present-day Libya) to fight in the Italo-Turkish War, mainly in the areas near Benghazi (Bingazi), Darnah (Derne) and Tobruk. A massive Italian amphibious assault force of 150,000 troops[32] had to be countered by 20,000 Bedouins[33] and 8,000 Turks[33] (a short time before Italy declared war, a large portion of the Turkish troops in Libya were sent to the Ottoman province of Yemen in order to put down the rebellion there, so the Ottoman government was caught with inadequate resources to counter the Italians in Libya; and the British government, which militarily controlled the de jure Ottoman provinces of Egypt and Sudan since the Urabi Revolt in 1882, didn't allow the Ottoman government to send additional Turkish troops to Libya through Egypt; causing the Turkish soldiers like Mustafa Kemal to go to Libya either dressed as Arabs (risking imprisonment if noticed by the British authorities in Egypt), or through very few available ferries (the Italians, who had superior naval forces, effectively controlled the sea routes to Tripoli).) However, despite all the hardships, Mustafa Kemal's forces in Libya managed to successfully repel the Italians in a number of occasions, such as the Battle of Tobruk on 22 December 1911. During the Battle of Darnah on 16-17 January 1912, while Mustafa Kemal was assaulting the Italian-controlled fortress of Kasr-? Harun, two Italian planes dropped bombs on the Ottoman forces and a piece of limestone from a damaged building's rubble entered Mustafa Kemal's left eye; which caused a permanent damage on his left eye's tissue, but not a total loss of sight. After receiving medical treatment for nearly a month (he attempted to leave the Red Crescent's health facilities early after only two weeks, but when his eye's situation worsened, he had to return and resume the treatment) on 6 March 1912 Mustafa Kemal became the Commander of the Ottoman forces in Darnah. He managed to defend and retain the city and its surrounding region until the end of the Italo-Turkish War on 18 October 1912. Mustafa Kemal, Enver Pasha and the other Turkish military commanders in Libya had to return to Istanbul following the outbreak of the Balkan Wars on 8 October 1912, due to which the Ottoman government agreed to surrender the provinces of Tripolitania, Fezzan and Cyrenaica (present-day Libya) to the Kingdom of Italy with the Treaty of Ouchy (First Treaty of Lausanne) signed ten days later, on October 18.
Balkan Wars (1912–1913)
Main article: Balkan Wars
See also: First Balkan War and Second Balkan War

On 1 December 1912, Mustafa Kemal arrived at his new headquarters on the Gallipoli peninsula and during the First Balkan War, he took part in the amphibious landing at Bulair on the coast of Thrace that was commanded by Binba?? Fethi Bey, but this offensive was repulsed during the Battle of Bulair by Georgi Todorov's 7th Lila Infantry Division[34] under the command of Stiliyan Kovachev's Bulgarian Fourth Army.[35]

In June 1913, during the Second Balkan War, he took part in the Ottoman Army forces commanded by Enver Pasha that recovered Dimetoka and Edirne (Adrianople, the capital city of the Ottoman Empire between 1365 and 1453, thus of utmost historic importance for the Turks) together with most of eastern Thrace from the Bulgarians.

In 1913, he was appointed the Ottoman military attaché to all Balkan states (his office was in Sofia, Bulgaria) and promoted to the rank of Kaymakam (Lieutenant Colonel) on March 1, 1914.[20]
First World War (1914–1918)
Main article: World War I
See also: Battle of Gallipoli and Middle Eastern theatre of World War I
Mustafa Kemal in the trenches of Gallipoli with his soldiers, 1915.

In 1914, the Ottoman Empire entered the European and Middle Eastern theatres of World War I allied with the Central Powers. Mustafa Kemal was given the task of organizing and commanding the 19th Division attached to the Fifth Army during the Battle of Gallipoli. Mustafa Kemal became the front-line commander after correctly anticipating where the Allies would attack and holding his position until they retreated. Following the Battle of Gallipoli, Mustafa Kemal served in Edirne until 14 January 1916. He was then assigned to the command of the XVI Corps of the Second Army and sent to the Caucasus Campaign after the massive Russian offensive had reached the Anatolian key cities. On 7 August, Mustafa Kemal rallied his troops and mounted a counteroffensive.[36] Two of his divisions captured Bitlis and Mu?, upsetting the calculations of the Russian Command.[37]

Following this victory, the CUP government in Constantinople proposed to establish a new army in Hejaz (Hicaz Kuvve-i Seferiyesi) and appoint Mustafa Kemal to its command, but he refused the proposal and this army was never established.[31] Instead, on 7 March 1917, Mustafa Kemal was promoted from the command of the XVI Corps to the overall command of the Second Army, although the Czar's armies were soon withdrawn when the Russian Revolution erupted.[36][31]

In July 1917 he was appointed to the command of the Seventh Army, replacing Fevzi Pasha on 7 August 1917, who was under the command of the German general Erich von Falkenhayn's Yildirim Army Group (after the British forces of General Edmund Allenby captured Jerusalem in December 1917, Erich von Falkenhayn was replaced by Otto Liman von Sanders who became the new commander of the Y?ld?r?m Army Group in early 1918.)[31] Mustafa Kemal Pasha could not get along well with General von Falkenhayn and, together with Miralay ?smet Bey, wrote a report to Grand Vizier Talat Pasha regarding the grim situation and lack of adequate resources in the Palestinian front; but Talat Pasha ignored their observations and suggestion that a stronger defensive line should be structured in northern Syria, closer to Anatolia, with Turks rather than Germans in command.[31] Following the rejection of his report, Mustafa Kemal resigned from the Seventh Army and returned to Constantinople.[31] There, he was assigned with the task of accompanying the crown prince (and future sultan) Mehmed Vahideddin during his train trip to Austria-Hungary and Germany.[31] While in Germany, Mustafa Kemal visited the German lines in the west European front and came to the conclusion that the Central Powers would soon lose the war.[31] He did not hesitate to openly express this opinion to Kaiser Wilhelm II and his high-ranking generals in first person.[31] During the return trip, he briefly stayed in Karlsbad and Vienna for medical treatment.[31]

When Mehmed VI became the new Sultan of the Ottoman Empire in July 1918, he called Mustafa Kemal to Constantinople, and in August 1918 assigned him to the command of the Seventh Army in Palestine.[31] Mustafa Kemal arrived in Aleppo on 26 August 1918, then continued south to his headquarters in Nablus. The Seventh Army was holding the central sector of the front lines. On September 19, at the beginning of the Battle of Megiddo, the Eighth Army was holding the coastal flank, but fell apart and Liman Pasha ordered the Seventh Army to withdraw to the north in order to prevent the British from conducting a short envelopment to the Jordan River. The Seventh Army retired towards the Jordan River in fair order and, according to the Armistice of Mudros, signed on October 30, 1918, all German and Austro-Hungarian troops in the Ottoman Empire would be given ample time to withdraw. On October 31, he was appointed to the command of the Y?ld?r?m Army Group, replacing Liman von Sanders. He organized the distribution of weapons to the civilians in Antep in case of a defensive conflict against the invading Allies.[31]

Kemal's last active service in the Ottoman Army was organizing the return of the troops left behind to the south of this line. In early November 1918 the Y?ld?r?m Army Group was officially dissolved and Mustafa Kemal returned to an occupied Constantinople, the Ottoman capital, on 13 November 1918.[31] For a period he worked at the headquarters of the Ministry of War (Harbiye Nezareti) in Constantinople and continued his activities in this city until 16 May 1919.[31] Along the established lines of the partitioning of the Ottoman Empire, the Allies (British, Italian, French and Greek forces) occupied Anatolia. The occupation of Constantinople, which was followed by the occupation of ?zmir (the two largest Turkish cities in that period) sparked the establishment of the Turkish national movement and the Turkish War of Independence.[38]
Turkish War of Independence (1919–1922)
Main article: Turkish War of Independence
See also: Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's leadership of the independence war
TIME 24 March 1923. Atatürk, the title reads 'Where is a Turk his own master?'

Fahri Yaver-i Hazret-i ?ehriyari ("Honorary Aide-de-camp to His Majesty Sultan") Mirliva Mustafa Kemal Pasha was assigned as the inspector of the Ninth Army Troops Inspectorate to reorganize what remained of the Ottoman military units and to improve internal security on April 30, 1919.[39] On 19 May 1919, he reached Samsun. His first goal was the establishment of an organized national resistance movement against the occupying forces. In June 1919, he issued the Amasya Circular, declaring the independence of the country was in danger. He resigned from the Ottoman Army on 8 July and the Ottoman government issued a warrant for his arrest. Later, he was condemned to death.

The last election to the Ottoman parliament held in December 1919 gave a sweeping majority to candidates of the "Association for Defense of Rights for Anatolia and Roumelia (Anadolu ve Rumeli Müdafaa-i Hukuk Cemiyeti)", headed by Mustafa Kemal, who himself remained in Ankara. The fourth (and last) term of the Parliament opened in Constantinople on 12 January 1920. It was dissolved by British forces on 18 March 1920, shortly after it adopted the Misak-? Milli ("National Pact"). Mustafa Kemal called for a national election to establish a new Turkish Parliament seated in Ankara[40] - the "Grand National Assembly" (GNA). On 23 April 1920, the GNA opened with Mustafa Kemal as the speaker; this act effectively created the situation of diarchy in the country.

On 10 August 1920, the Ottoman Grand Vizier Damat Ferid Pasha signed the Treaty of Sèvres, finalizing plans for the partitioning of the Ottoman Empire, including the regions that Turkish nationals viewed as their heartland. Mustafa Kemal insisted on the country's complete independence and the safeguarding of interests of the Turkish majority on "Turkish soil". He persuaded the GNA to gather a National Army. The GNA Army faced the Caliphate army propped up by the Allied occupation forces and had the immediate task of fighting the Armenians forces in the North-East and the Greeks who advanced eastward from Smyrna (modern day Izmir) that they had occupied in May 1919.

The GNA military successes against the Democratic Republic of Armenia in the autumn of 1920 and later against the Greeks were made possible[41] by a steady supply of gold and armaments to the kemalists from the Russian Bolshevik government from the autumn 1920 onwards.

After a series of battles during the Greco-Turkish war, the Greek army advanced as far as the Sakarya River, just eighty kilometers west of the GNA. On 5 August 1921, Mustafa Kemal was promoted to Commander in chief of the forces by the GNA.[42] The ensuing Battle of Sakarya was fought from 23 August to 13 September 1921 and ended with the defeat of the Greeks. After this victory, on September 19, 1921, Mustafa Kemal Pasha was given by the Grand National Assembly the rank of "Marshal" and the title of "Ghazi". The Allies, ignoring the extent of Kemal's successes, hoped to impose a modified version of the Treaty of Sèvres as a peace settlement on Ankara, but the proposal was rejected. In August 1922, Kemal launched an all-out attack on the Greek lines at Afyonkarahisar in the Battle of Dumlup?nar and Turkish forces regained control of Smyrna on 9 September 1922.[43] On 10 September 1922, Mustafa Kemal sent a telegram to the League of Nations saying that the Turkish population was so worked up that the Ankara Government would not be responsible for massacres.[44]
Establishment of the Republic of Turkey
See also: Treaty of Lausanne

The Conference of Lausanne began on 21 November 1922. Turkey, represented by ?smet ?nönü of the GNA, refused any proposal that would compromise Turkish sovereignty,[45] such as the control of Turkish finances, the Capitulations, the Straits and other issues. On 24 July 1923, the Treaty of Lausanne was signed by the Powers with the GNA, thus recognising the latter as the government of Turkey.

On 29 October 1923, the Republic of Turkey was proclaimed.
Presidency
For conceptual analysis, see Kemalist ideology and Atatürk's Reforms.
In 1930, leaving the parliament after the 7th-year celebration meeting. ?smet ?nönü, the second President of Turkey, is to the left.

With the establishment of the Republic of Turkey, efforts to modernise the country started. The new government analyzed the institutions and constitutions of Western states such as France, Sweden, Italy, and Switzerland and adapted them to the needs and characteristics of the Turkish nation. Highlighting the public's lack of knowledge regarding Kemal's intentions, the public cheered: "We are returning to the days of the first caliphs."[46] Mustafa Kemal placed Fevzi Çakmak, Kâz?m Özalp and ?smet ?nönü in political positions where they could institute his reforms. Mustafa Kemal capitalized on his reputation as an efficient military leader and spent the following years, up until his death in 1938, instituting political, economic, and social reforms. In doing so, he transformed Turkish society from perceiving itself as a Muslim part of a vast Empire into a modern, democratic, and secular nation-state.
Domestic policies

Kemal's basic tenet was the complete independence of the country.[47] He clarified his position:
“ ...by complete independence, we mean of course complete economic, financial, juridical, military, cultural independence and freedom in all matters. Being deprived of independence in any of these is equivalent to the nation and country being deprived of all its independence.[48] ”

He led wide-ranging reforms in social, cultural, and economical aspects, establishing the new Republic's backbone of legislative, judicial, and economic structures.

Mustafa Kemal created a banner to mark the changes between the old Ottoman and the new republican rule. Each change was symbolized as an arrow in this banner. This defining ideology of the Republic of Turkey is referred to as the "Six Arrows", or Kemalist ideology. Kemalist ideology is based on Mustafa Kemal's conception of realism and pragmatism.[49] The fundamentals of nationalism, populism and etatism were all defined under the Six Arrows. These fundamentals were not new in world politics or, indeed, among the elite of Turkey. What made them unique was that these interrelated fundamentals were formulated specifically for Turkey's needs. A good example is the definition and application of secularism; the Kemalist secular state significantly differed from predominantly Christian states.
Emergence of the state, 1923–1924
A political satire from the single-party period depicting Mustafa Kemal, the leader of the RPP, choosing the party's candidates for prospective MPs, to be elected in the incoming parliamentary elections. During the single-party state, the candidates had only one party's (RPP) list to join.

Mustafa Kemal's private journal entries dated before the establishment of the republic in 1923 show that he believed in the importance of the sovereignty of the people. In forging the new republic, the Turkish revolutionaries turned their back on the perceived corruption and decadence of cosmopolitan Constantinople and its Ottoman heritage.[50] For instance, they made Ankara the country's new capital. A provincial town deep in Anatolia, it was turned into the center of the independence movement. Atatürk wanted a "direct government by the Assembly"[51] and visualized a representative democracy, parliamentary sovereignty, where the National Parliament would be the ultimate source of power.[51]

In the following years, he altered his stance somewhat; the country needed an immense amount of reconstruction, and that "direct government by the Assembly" could not survive in such an environment. The revolutionaries faced challenges from the supporters of the old Ottoman regime, and also from the supporters of newer ideologies such as communism and fascism. Mustafa Kemal saw the consequences of fascist and communist doctrines in the 1920s and 1930s and rejected both.[52] He prevented the spread into Turkey of the totalitarian party rule which held sway in the Soviet Union, Germany and Italy.[53] Some perceived his opposition and silencing of these ideologies as a means of eliminating competition; others believed it was necessary to protect the young Turkish state from succumbing to the instability of new ideologies and competing factions.[citation needed]

The heart of the new republic was the GNA, established during the Turkish War of Independence by Mustafa Kemal.[54] The elections were free and used an egalitarian electoral system that was based on a general ballot.[54] Deputies at the GNA served as the voice of Turkish society by expressing its political views and preferences. It had the right to select and control both the government and the Prime Minister. Initially, it also acted as a legislative power, controlling the executive branch and, if necessary, acted as an organ of scrutiny under the Turkish Constitution of 1921.[54] The Turkish Constitution of 1924 set a loose separation of powers between the legislative and the executive organs of the state, whereas the separation of these two within the judiciary system was a strict one. Mustafa Kemal, then the President, occupied a powerful position in this political system.

The single-party regime was established de facto in 1925 after the adoption of the 1924 constitution. The only political party of the GNA was the "Peoples Party", founded by Mustafa Kemal in the initial years of the independence war. On 9 September 1923 it was renamed the Republican People's Party (Turkish Cumhuriyeti Halk Partis?).
Civic independence and the Caliphate, 1924–1925
In 1924, during his speech in Bursa.

Abolition of the Caliphate was an important dimension in Mustafa Kemal's drive to reform the political system and to promote the national sovereignty. By the consensus of the Muslim majority in early centuries, the caliphate was the core political concept of Sunni Islam.[55] Abolishing the sultanate was easier because the survival of the Caliphate at the time satisfied the partisans of the sultanate. This produced a split system with the new republic on one side and an Islamic form of government with the Caliph on the other side, and Kemal and ?nönü worried that "it nourished the expectations that the sovereign would return under the guise of Caliph.[56]" Caliph Abdülmecid II was elected after the abolishment of the sultanate (1922).

The caliph had his own personal treasury and also had a personal service that included military personnel; Mustafa Kemal said that there was no "religious" or "political" justification for this. He believed that Caliph Abdülmecid II was following in the steps of the sultans in domestic and foreign affairs: accepting of and responding to foreign representatives and reserve officers, and participating in official ceremonies and celebrations.[57] He wanted to integrate the powers of the caliphate into the powers of the GNA. His initial activities began on 1 January 1924, when [57] ?nönü, Çakmak and Özalp consented to the abolition of the caliphate. The caliph made a statement to the effect that he would not interfere with political affairs.[58] On 1 March 1924, at the Assembly, Mustafa Kemal said
“ The religion of Islam will be elevated if it will cease to be a political instrument, as had been the case in the past.[59] ”

On 3 March 1924, the caliphate was officially abolished and its powers within Turkey were transferred to the GNA. Other Muslim nations debated the validity of Turkey's unilateral abolition of the caliphate as they decided whether they should confirm the Turkish action or appoint a new caliph.[58] A "Caliphate Conference" was held in Cairo in May 1926 and a resolution was passed declaring the caliphate "a necessity in Islam", but failed to implement this decision.[58]

Two other Islamic conferences were held in Mecca (1926) and Jerusalem (1931), but failed to reach a consensus.[58] Turkey did not accept the re-establishment of the caliphate and perceived it as an attack to its basic existence; while Mustafa Kemal and the reformists continued their own way.[60]

The removal of the caliphate was followed by an extensive effort to establish the separation of governmental and religious affairs. Education was the cornerstone in this effort. In 1923, there were three main educational groups of institutions. The most common institutions were medreses based on Arabic, the Qur'an and memorization. The second type of institution was idadî and sultanî, the reformist schools of the Tanzimat era. The last group included colleges and minority schools in foreign languages that used the latest teaching models in educating pupils. The old medrese education was modernized.[61] Mustafa Kemal changed the classical Islamic education for a vigorously promoted reconstruction of educational institutions.[61] Kemal linked educational reform to the liberation of the nation from dogma, which he believed was more important than the Turkish war of independence.
“ Today, our most important and most productive task is the national education [unification and modernization] affairs. We have to be successful in national education affairs and we shall be. The liberation of a nation is only achieved through this way."[62] ”

In the summer of 1924, Mustafa Kemal invited American educational reformer John Dewey to Anakara to advise him on how to reform Turkish education.[61] His public education reforms aimed to prepare citizens for roles in public life through increasing the public literacy. He wanted to institute compulsory primary education for both girls and boys; since then this effort has been an ongoing task for the republic. He pointed out that one of the main targets of education in Turkey had to be raising a generation nourished with what he called the "public culture". The state schools established a common curriculum which became known as the "unification of education."

Unification of education was put into force on 3 March 1924 by the Law on Unification of Education (No. 430). With the new law, education became inclusive, organized on a model of the civil community. In this new design, all schools submitted their curriculum to the "Ministry of National Education", a government agency modelled after other countries' ministries of education. Concurrently, the republic abolished the two ministries and made clergy subordinate to the department of religious affairs, one of the foundations of secularism in Turkey. The unification of education under one curriculum ended "clerics or clergy of the Ottoman Empire", but was not the end of religious schools in Turkey; they were moved to higher education until later governments restored them to their former position in secondary education after Mustafa Kemal's death.
Atatürk with his Panama hat just after the Kastamonu speech in 1925.

Beginning in the fall of 1925, Mustafa Kemal encouraged the Turks to wear modern European attire.[63] He was determined to force the abandonment of the sartorial traditions of the Middle East and finalize a series of dress reforms, which were originally started by Mahmud II.[63] The fez was established by Sultan Mahmud II in 1826 as part of the Ottoman Empire's modernization effort. The Hat Law of 1925 introduced the use of Western-style hats instead of the fez. Mustafa Kemal first made the hat compulsory to civil servants.[63] The guidelines for the proper dressing of students and state employees were passed during his lifetime; many civil servants adopted the hat willingly. In 1925, Mustafa Kemal wore his "Panama hat" during a public appearance in Kastamonu, one of the most conservative towns in Anatolia, to explain that the hat was the headgear of civilized nations. The last part of reform on dress emphasized the need to wear modern Western suits with neckties as well as Fedora and Derby-style hats instead of antiquated religion-based clothing such as the veil and turban in the Law Relating to Prohibited Garments of 1934.

Even though he personally promoted modern dress for women, Mustafa Kemal never made specific reference to women’s clothing in the law, as he believed that women would adapt to the new clothing styles of their own free will. He was frequently photographed on public business with his wife Lâtife U?akl?gil, who covered her head in accordance with Islamic tradition. He was also frequently photographed on public business with women wearing modern Western clothes. But it was Atatürk's adopted daughters, Sabiha Gökçen and Afet ?nan, who provided the real role model for the Turkish women of the future. He wrote: "The religious covering of women will not cause difficulty ... This simple style [of headcovering] is not in conflict with the morals and manners of our society."[64]
In 1923, with members of the Mevlana order before its institutional expression became illegal and their dervish lodge changed into the Mevlana Museum. The Mevlevi order managed to transform itself into a nonpolitical organization which still exists.

On 30 August 1925, Mustafa Kemal's view on religious insignia used outside places of worship was introduced in his Kastamonu speech. This speech also had another position. He said:
“ In the face of knowledge, science, and of the whole extent of radiant civilization, I cannot accept the presence in Turkey's civilized community of people primitive enough to seek material and spiritual benefits in the guidance of sheiks. The Turkish republic cannot be a country of sheiks, dervishes, and disciples. The best, the truest order is the order of civilization. To be a man it is enough to carry out the requirements of civilization. The leaders of dervish orders will understand the truth of my words, and will themselves close down their lodges [tekke] and admit that their disciplines have grown up.[47] ”

On 2 September the government issued a decree closing down all Sufi orders and the tekkes. Mustafa Kemal ordered their dervish lodges to be converted to museums, such as Mevlana Museum in Konya. The institutional expression of Sufism became illegal in Turkey; a politically neutral form of Sufism, functioning as social associations, was permitted to exist.[citation needed]

The abolition of the caliphate and other cultural reforms were met with fierce opposition. The conservative elements were not happy and they launched attacks on the Kemalist reformists.[58]
Opposition to Kemal in 1924–1927
Mustaf Kemal Anatolian tours.ogg
Play video
Atatürk during one of his Anatolian tours.

In 1924, while the "Issue of Mosul" was on the table, Sheikh Said Piran began to organize the Sheikh Said Rebellion. Sheikh Said Piran was a wealthy Kurdish Tribal chief of a local Naqshbandi order. Piran emphasized the issue of religion; he not only opposed the abolition of the Caliphate, but also the adoption of civil codes based on Western models, the closure of religious orders, the ban on polygamy, and the new obligatory civil marriage. Piran stirred up his followers against the policies of the government, which he considered anti-Islamic. In an effort to restore Islamic law, Piran's forces moved through the countryside, seized government offices and marched on the important cities of Elaz?? and Diyarbak?r.[65] Members of the government saw the Sheikh Said Rebellion as an attempt at a counter-revolution. They urged immediate military action to prevent its spread. The "Law for the Maintenance of Public Order" was passed to deal with the rebellion on 4 March 1925. It gave the government exceptional powers and included the authority to shut down subversive groups, but was repealed on 4 March 1929.

There were also parliamentarians in the GNA who were not happy with these changes. So many members were denounced as opposition sympathizers at a private meeting of the Republican People's Party (CHP) that Mustafa Kemal expressed his fear of being among the minority in his own party.[66] He decided not to purge this group.[66] After a censure motion gave the chance to have a breakaway group, Kaz?m Karabekir, along with his friends, established such a group on 17 October 1924. The censure became a confidence vote at the CHP for Mustafa Kemal. On 8 November, the motion was rejected by 148 votes to 18, and 41 votes were absent.[66] CHP held all but one seat in the parliament. After the majority of the CHP chose him[66] Mustafa Kemal said, "the Turkish nation is firmly determined to advance fearlessly on the path of the republic, civilization and progress".[66]

On 17 November 1924, the breakaway group established the Progressive Republican Party (PRP) with 29 deputies and the first multi-party system began. The PRP's economic program suggested liberalism, in contrast to the state socialism of CHP, and its social program was based on conservatism in contrast to the modernism of CHP. Leaders of the party strongly supported the Kemalist revolution in principle, but had different opinions on the cultural revolution and the principle of secularism.[67] The RPR was not against Mustafa Kemal's main positions as declared in its program; they supported establishing secularism in the country and the civic law, or as stated, "the needs of the age" (article 3) and the uniform system of education (article 49).[66] These principles were set by the leaders at the onset. The only legal opposition became a home for all kinds of differing views.

During 1926, a plot to assassinate Mustafa Kemal was uncovered in ?zmir. It originated with a former deputy who had opposed the abolition of the Caliphate. Investigation shifted from an inquiry into the planners to an investigation ostensibly to uncover subversive activities but in truth used to undermine those disagreeing with Kemal's cultural revolution. The sweeping investigation brought a number of political activists before the tribunal, including Karabekir, the leader of PRP. A number of surviving leaders of the Committee of Union and Progress, who were at best second-rank in the Turkish movement, including Cavid, Ahmed ?ükrü, and Ismail Canbulat, were found guilty of treason and hanged.[68] The investigations found a link between the members of the PRP and the Sheikh Said Rebellion. The PRP was dissolved following the outcomes of the trial. The pattern of organized opposition, however, was broken. This action was the only broad political purge during Atatürk's presidency. Mustafa Kemal's saying, "My mortal body will turn into dust, but the Republic of Turkey will last forever," was regarded as a will after the assassination attempt.[69]
Modernization efforts, 1926–1930

In the years following 1926, Mustafa Kemal introduced a radical departure from previous reformations established by the Ottoman Empire.[70] For the first time in history, Islamic law was separated from secular law, and restricted to matters of religion.[70] Mustafa Kemal said
“ We must liberate our concepts of justice, our laws and our legal institutions from the bonds which, even though they are incompatible with the needs of our century, still hold a tight grip on us.[71] ”

On 1 March 1926, the Turkish penal code was passed. It was modelled after the Italian Penal Code. On 4 October 1926, Islamic courts were closed. Establishing the civic law needed time, so Kemal delayed the inclusion of the principle of laïcité until 5 February 1937.

Ottoman practice discouraged social interaction between men and women in keeping with Islamic practice of sex segregation. Mustafa Kemal began developing social reforms very early, as was evident in his personal journal. He and his staff discussed issues like abolishing the veiling of women and the integration of women into the outside world. The clue on how he was planning to tackle the issue was stated in his journal on November 1915;
“ The social change can come by (1) educating capable mothers who are knowledgeable about life; (2) giving freedom to women; (3) a man can change his morals, thoughts, and feelings by leading a common life with a woman; as there is an inborn tendency towards the attraction of mutual affection.[72] ”
President Kemal at the 1927 opening of the State Art and Sculpture Museum.

Mustafa Kemal needed a new civil code to establish his second major step of giving freedom to women. The first part was the education of girls and was established with the unification of education. On 4 October 1926, the new Turkish civil code passed. It was modelled after the Swiss Civil Code. Under the new code, women gained equality with men in such matters as inheritance and divorce. Mustafa Kemal did not consider gender a factor in social organization. According to his view, society marched towards its goal with men and women united. He believed that it was scientifically impossible for him to achieve progress and to become civilized if the gender separation continued as in Ottoman times.[73] During a meeting he declaimed:
“ To the women: Win for us the battle of education and you will do yet more for your country than we have been able to do. It is to you that I appeal.
To the men: If henceforward the women do not share in the social life of the nation, we shall never attain to our full development. We shall remain irremediably backward, incapable of treating on equal terms with the civilizations of the West.[74] ”

In 1927, the State Art and Sculpture Museum (Turkish: Ankara Resim ve Heykel Müzesi) opened its doors. The museum highlighted sculpture, which was little practised in Turkey owing to the Islamic tradition of avoiding idolatry. Kemal believed that "culture is the foundation of the Turkish Republic."[75] and described modern Turkey's ideological thrust as "a creation of patriotism blended with a lofty humanist ideal." He included both his own nation's creative legacy and what he saw as the admirable values of global civilization. The pre-Islamic culture of the Turks became the subject of extensive research, and particular emphasis was laid upon Turkish culture widespread before the Seljuk and Ottoman civilizations. He instigated study of Anatolian civilizations--Phrygians and Lydians, Sumerians and Hittites. To attract current public attention to past cultures, he personally named the "Sümerbank" (1932) after the Sumerians, and the "Etibank" (1935) after the Hittites. He also stressed the folk arts of the countryside as a wellspring of Turkish creativity.
President Gazi Mustafa Kemal introducing the new Turkish alphabet to the people of Kayseri (20 September 1928.)

In the spring of 1928, Mustafa Kemal met in Anakara with several linguists and professors from all over Turkey where he unveiled to them a plan of his to implement a new alphabet for the written Turkish language based on a modified Latin alphabet. The new Turkish alphabet would serve as a replacement for the old Arabic script and as a solution to the literacy problem in Turkey. When he asked how long it would take to implement the new alphabet into the Turkish language, most of the professors and linguists said between three to five years. Kemal was said to have scoffed and openly stated, "we shall do it in three to five months".

Over the next several months, Mustafa Kemal pressed for the introduction of the new Turkish alphabet as well as made public announcements to the upcoming overhaul of the new alphabet. On 1 November 1928, Mustafa Kemal introduced the new Turkish alphabet and abolished the use of Arabic script. At the time, literate citizens of the country comprised as little as 10% of the population. Dewey noted to Kemal that learning how to read and write in Turkish with the Arabic script took roughly three years with rather strenuous methods at the elementary level.[61] They used the Ottoman Language written in the Arabic script with Arabic and Persian loan vocabulary.[61] The creation of the new Turkish alphabet as a variant of the Latin alphabet was undertaken by the Language Commission (Turkish: Dil Encümeni) with the initiative of Mustafa Kemal.[61] The tutelage was received from an Ottoman-Armenian calligrapher.[76] The first Turkish newspaper using the new alphabet was published on 15 December 1928. Kemal himself travelled the countryside in order to teach citizens the new alphabet. The country's adaptation to the new alphabet was very quick, and literacy in Turkey jumped from 10% to over 70% within two years. Beginning in 1932, the People's Houses (Turkish: Halk Evleri) opened throughout the country in order to meet the requirement that people between the ages of four and 40 were required to learn the new alphabet as mandated. There were congresses for discussing the issues of copyright, public education and scientific publishing. Literacy reform was also supported by strengthening the private publishing sector with a new law on copyrights.

Mustafa Kemal promoted modern teaching methods at the primary education level, and Dewey took a place of honour.[61] Dewey presented a paradigmatic set of recommendations designed for developing societies that are moving towards modernity in his "Report and Recommendation for the Turkish educational system."[61] He was interested in adult education for the goal of forming a skill base in the country. Turkish women were taught not only child care, dress-making and household management, but also skills needed to join the economy outside the home. Turkish education became a state-supervised system, which was designed to create a skill base for the social and economic progress of the country.[77] His "unified" education program was designed to educate responsible citizens as well as useful and appreciated members of society.[61] Turkish education became an integrative system, aimed to alleviate poverty and used female education to establish gender equality.

Mustafa Kemal generated media attention to propagate modern education during this period. He instigated official education meetings called "Science Boards" and "Education Summits." to discuss the quality of education, training issues and certain basic educational principles. He said, "our schools [curriculum] should aim to provide opportunities for all pupils to learn and to achieve." He was personally engaged with the development of two textbooks. The first one was Turkish: Vatanda? ?çin Medeni Bilgiler (1930). The second, Geometry (1937), was a text for high schools. The Vatanda? ?çin Medeni Bilgiler (Civic knowledge for the citizens) introduced the science of comparative government and explained the means of administering public trust by explaining the rules of governance as applied to the new state institutions.
Opposition to Kemal in 1930–1931
Mustafa Kemal with the Liberal Republican Party leader Ali Fethi Okyar and his daughter in Yalova, on 13 August 1930.

On 11 August 1930, Mustafa Kemal decided to try a multiparty movement once again and asked Ali Fethi Okyar to establish a new party. He insisted on the protection of secular reforms. The brand-new Liberal Republican Party succeeded all around the country. Without the establishment of a real political spectrum, once again, the party became the center to opposition of Atatürk's reforms, particularly in regard to the role of religion in public life.

On 23 December 1930, a chain of violent incidents occurred, starting with the rebellion of Islamic fundamentalists in Menemen, a small town in the Aegean region. This so-called Menemen Incident was considered a serious threat against secular reforms.

In November 1930, Ali Fethi Okyar dissolved his own party. A more lasting multi-party period of the Republic of Turkey began in 1945. In 1950, the RPP released the majority position to the Democratic Party. There are arguments that Kemal's single party rule did not promote direct democracy. The experiments with pluralism failed during this period was that not all groups in the country had agreed to a minimal consensus regarding shared values (mainly secularism) and shared rules for conflict resolution. In response to such criticisms, Mustafa Kemal's biographer Andrew Mango said: "between the two wars, democracy could not be sustained in many relatively richer and better-educated societies. Atatürk's enlightened authoritarianism left a reasonable space for free private lives. More could not have been expected in his lifetime."[78] Even though, at times, he did not appear to be a democrat in his actions, he always supported the idea of building a civil society: a system of voluntary civic and social organizations and institutions as opposed to the force-backed structures of the state. In one of his many speeches about the importance of democracy, Mustafa Kemal said in 1933:
“ Republic means the democratic administration of the state. We founded the Republic, reaching its tenth year. It should enforce all the requirements of democracy as the time comes.[79] ”
Modernization efforts, 1931–1938
In 1931, during the establishment ceremony of the Turkish History Institution.

In 1931, Mustafa Kemal established the Turkish Language Association for conducting research works in the Turkish language (Turkish: Türk Dil Kurumu). The Turkish Historical Society (Turkish: Türk Tarih Kurumu) was established in 1931, and began maintaining archives in 1932 for conducting research works on the history of Turkey.[80] On 1 January 1928, he established the Turkish Education Association.[80] The Association supported intelligent and hard-working children in financial need, as well as making material and scientific contributions to the educational life.
Atatürk visits the Istanbul University after its reorganization, 1933.

In 1933, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk ordered the reorganization of Istanbul University into a modern institution and later established Ankara University in the capital city.[81]

Mustafa Kemal dealt with the translation of scientific terminology into Turkish.[82] He wanted the Turkish language reform to be methodologically based. Any attempt to "cleanse" the Turkish language of foreign influence without modelling the integral structure of the language was inherently wrong to him. He personally oversaw the development of the Sun Language Theory (Turkish: Güne? Dil Teorisi), which was a linguistic theory which proposed that all human languages were descendants of one Central Asian primal language. His interest started with the works by the French scientist Hilaire de Barenton entitled L'Origine des Langues, des Religions et des Peuples, which postulates that all languages originated from hieroglyphs and cuneiform used by Sumerians,[83] and the paper of Austrian linguist Dr. Hermann F. Kvergi? of Vienna entitled "La psychologie de quelques elements des langues Turques" ("the psychology of some elements of the Turkic Languages").[84] He introduced the Sun Language Theory into Turkish political and educational circles in 1935, although he did later correct the more extremist practices.[82]
Atatürk at the library of the Çankaya Presidential Residence in Ankara, on 16 July 1929.

Beginning in 1932, several hundred "People's Houses" (Turkish: Halk Evi) and "People's Rooms" (Halk Odas?) across the country allowed greater access to a wide variety of artistic activities, sports, and other cultural events. Atatürk supported and encouraged the visual and the plastic arts, which had been suppressed by the Ottoman leaders, who regarded depiction of the human form as idolatry. Many museums opened, architecture began to follow modern trends, and classical Western music, opera, and ballet, as well as the theatre, also took greater hold. Book and magazine publications increased as well, and the film industry began to grow.
The original 1935 print of the first Quran in Turkish language, ordered by Atatürk.

In 1932, a Qur'an in the Turkish language was read before a live audience and broadcast over the radio.[85] That same year, Mustafa Kemal wanted to "teach religion in Turkish to Turkish people who had been practising Islam without understanding it for centuries"[86] All Qur'ans at the time were printed in Old Arabic. There was a rare polyglot Qu'ran written in Arabic, Persian, Turkish and Latin in the tetrapla style, prepared by savant Andrea Acolutho of Bernstadt and printed at Berlin in 1701.[87] In 1924, three Turkish translations published in Istanbul created controversy. Several renderings of the Qur'an in the Turkish language were read in front of the public.[85] These Turkish Qur'ans were fiercely opposed by religious people. This incident impelled many leading Muslim modernists to call upon the Turkish Parliament to sponsor a Qur'an translation of suitable quality.[88] With the support of Mustafa Kemal, the Parliament approved the project and the Directorate of Religious Affairs enlisted, Mehmet Akif (Ersoy), to compose a Qur'an translation and a Islamic scholar Elmal?l? Hamdi Yaz?r to author a Turkish language Qur'anic commentary (tafsir) titled "Hak Dini Kur'an Dili." It was only in 1935 that the version read in public found its way to print.[89] Mustafa Kemal believed that the understanding of religion was too important to be left to a small group of people.[86] This included the central religious text of Islam. Mustafa Kemal's objective was to make the Qu'ran accessible to modern people, and therefore to translate it into modern languages.[86]

In 1934, Mustafa Kemal commissioned the first Turkish operatic work, Özsoy. The opera, which was staged at the People's House in Ankara, was composed by Adnan Saygun and performed by soprano Semiha Berksoy.[90]
Eighteen female MPs joined the Turkish Parliament with the 1935 general elections.

On 5 December 1934, Turkey moved to grant full political rights to women, before several other European nations. The equal rights of women in marriage had already been established in the earlier Turkish civil code.[91] Women's place in Mustafa Kemal's cultural reforms was best expressed in the civic book prepared under his supervision.[92] Mustafa Kemal said that
“ There is no logical explanation for the political disenfranchisement of women. Any hesitation and negative mentality on this subject is nothing more than a fading social phenomenon of the past. ...Women must have the right to vote and to be elected; because democracy dictates that, because there are interests that women must defend, and because there are social duties that women must perform.[93] ”

Change came slowly; in the 1935 elections there were only 18 female MPs out of a total of 395 representatives.
Foreign policies

Atatürk's foreign policy followed his motto, "peace at home and peace in the world."[94] a perception of peace linked to his project of civilization and modernization.[95] The outcomes of Kemal's policies depended on the power of the parliamentary sovereignty established by the Republic.[96] The Turkish War of Independence was the last time Atatürk used his military might in dealing with other countries. Foreign issues were resolved by peaceful methods during his presidency.
Issue of Mosul
During the visit of Abdullah I of Jordan.

The "Issue of Mosul", a dispute with the United Kingdom over control of Mosul Province, was one of the first foreign affairs-related controversies of the new Republic. During the Mesopotamian campaign, General Marshall followed the British War Office's instruction that "every effort was to be made to score as heavily as possible on the Tigris before the whistle blew", capturing Mosul three days after the signature of the Armistice of Mudros (30 October 1918).[97] In 1920, the Misak-? Milli, which consolidated the "Turkish lands", declared that Mosul Province was a part of the historic Turkish heartland. The British were in a precarious situation with the Issue of Mosul, and were adopting almost equally desperate measures to protect their interests. The Iraqi revolt against the British was put down by the RAF Iraq Command during the summer of 1920. From the British perspective, if Mustafa Kemal Atatürk stabilized Turkey, he would then turn his attention to Mosul and penetrate Mesopotamia, where the native population would probably join him thus bringing an insurgent and hostile Muslim nation to the very gates of India.

In 1923, Mustafa Kemal tried to persuade the GNA that accepting the arbitration of the League of Nations at the Treaty of Lausanne over Mosul did not mean relinquishing Mosul, but rather waiting for a time when Turkey might be stronger. The artificially drawn border had an unsettling effect on both sides of the population. Later, it was claimed that Turkey began where the oil ends as the border was drawn by the British geophysicists based on the oil reserves. Atatürk did not want this separation.[98] The British Foreign Secretary attempted to disclaim any existence of oil in the Mosul area. On 23 January 1923, Lord Curzon argued that the existence of oil was no more than hypothetical.[97] However, according to Armstrong, "England wanted oil. Mosul and Kurds were the key."[99]

While three inspectors from the League of Nations Committee were sent to the region to oversee the situation in 1924, the Sheikh Said rebellion, beginning in 1924 and escalating until 1927, set out to establish a new government positioned to cut Turkey's link to Mesopotamia. The relationship between the rebels and Britain was questioned. British assistance was sought after the rebels realised that the rebellion, or its expected outcome, could not stand by itself.[100]

In 1925, the League of Nations formed a three-member committee to study the case while the Sheikh Said Rebellion was on the rise. Partly because of the continuing uncertainties along the northern frontier (present-day northern Iraq), the committee recommended that the region should be connected to Iraq with the condition that the UK would hold the British Mandate of Mesopotamia. By the end of March 1925, the necessary troop movements were completed, and the whole area of the Sheikh Said rebellion was encircled.[101] As a result of these manoeuvres, the revolt was put down. Britain, Iraq and Kemal made a treaty on 5 June 1926, which mostly followed the decisions of the League Council. In 1926, Kemal faced growing opposition to his reform policies, a continuing precarious economic situation, and a defeat in the Mosul issue. A large section of the Kurdish population and the Iraqi Turkmen were left on the other side of the border. The Sheikh Said Rebellion hastened both the imposition of the Republican Party and the speed of Atatürk's reforms. In 1925, the population was largely illiterate and disparate. Turkey was in ruins, reconstruction was difficult, poverty was everywhere and people were in pain, which fed separatist violence.[102] Mustafa Kemal attributed the rebellion to certain notables rather than a section of the population, who had been found guilty by the courts (kanunen mucrim olan bazi muteneffizan) and who used the mask of religion to conceal the interests of landlords, feudal tribal leaders and other "reactionaries" on 7 March 1925.[103]
Relations with the RSFSR/Soviet Union
See also: Russia–Turkey relations#Turkey and the Soviet Union
During a reception at the USSR Embassy in Ankara, on 7 November 1927.

In his message to Vladimir Lenin, Russian bolsheviks' leader and head of the RSFSR's government, dated 26 April 1920, Kemal promised to coordinate his military operations with the bolsheviks' "fight against imperialist governments" and requested 5 million lira in gold as well as armaments "as first aid" to his forces.[104] In 1920 alone, the Lenin government supplied the kemalists with 6,000 rifles, over 5 million rifle cartridges, 17,600 projectiles as well as 200.6 kg of gold bullion; in the subsequent 2 years the amount of aid increased.[105]

In March 1921, the GNA representatives in Moscow signed the "Friendship and Brotherhood" Treaty with Soviet Russia, which was a major diplomatic breakthrough for the kemalists. The Treaty of Moscow, followed by the identical Treaty of Kars in October the same year, gave Turkey a favourable settlement of its north-eastern frontier at the expense the Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic, then nominally an independent state.

The two country's relations were friendly but were based on the fact that they were fighting against a common enemy: Britain and the West.[106] In 1920, Kemal toyed with the idea to use a state-controlled Turkish Communist Party to forestall the perceived spread of communist ideas in the country and gain access to the Comintern's financing;[107] nevertheless, the entire Turkish communist leadership were assassinated on 28 January 1921 at Kemal's behest.[108]

"Friendship with Russia," said Mustafa Kemal, "is not to adopt their ideology of communism for Turkey."[106] He declared: "Communism is a social issue. Social conditions, religion, and national traditions of our country confirm the opinion that Russian Communism is not applicable in Turkey."[109] In a 1 November 1924 speech he said: "Our amicable relations with our old friend the Soviet Russian Republic are developing and progressing every day. As in past our Republican Government regards genuine and extensive good relations with Soviet Russia as the Keynote of our foreign policy."[106]

After the Turks, on 16 December 1925, withdrew their delegation from Geneva, thus leaving the League of Nations Council to grant a mandate for the Mosul region to Britain without their consent, Kemal countered[110] by concluding a non-aggression pact with the USSR on 17 December the same year.[111] In 1935, the pact was prolonged for another 10 years.[112]
Exchanges on the concept of a Balkan Federation during the visit of Voroshilov, a vision of Kemal's which was never achieved.

In 1933, the Soviet War minister Kliment Voroshilov visited Turkey and attended the tenth year celebrations of the Republic.[113] Kemal explained his position regarding the realization of his plan for a Balkan Federation economically uniting Turkey, Greece, Romania, Yugoslavia and Bulgaria.[113]

During the second half of the 1930s, Mustafa Kemal tried to establish a closer relationship with Britain and other major western powers, which caused displeasure on the part of the Soviets. The second edition of the Great Soviet Encyclopedia (Volume 20, 1953) was unequivocally critical of Kemal's policies in the last years of his rule, calling his domestic policies "anti-popular" and his foreign course as aimed at rapprochement with the "imperialist powers."[114]
Turkish-Greek alliance
Hosting the Greek Prime Minister Eleftherios Venizelos (at left) in October 1932.

The post-war leader of Greece, Eleftherios Venizelos, was also determined to establish normal relations between the two states. The war devastated Western Anatolia, and the financial burden of Ottoman Muslim refugees from Greece blocked rapprochement. Venizelos moved forward with the agreement despite accusations of conceding too much on the issues of the naval armaments, and the properties of the Ottoman Greeks from Turkey according to the Treaty of Lausanne.[115] Kemal resisted the pressures of historic enmities or atrocity-mongering between the societies. In spite of Turkish animosity against the Greeks, Kemal showed acute sensitivity to even the slightest allusion to these tensions; at one point, he ordered the removal of a painting showing a Turkish soldier plunging his bayonet to a Greek soldier by stating, "What a revolting scene!".[116]

Ultimately, many Greeks consider the reconciliation with Turkey among the greatest foreign policy achievements of Venizelos' final term as Prime Minister. Greece renounced all its claims over Turkish territory and the two sides concluded an agreement on 30 April 1930. On 25 October, Venizelos visited Turkey, and signed a treaty of friendship.[117] Venizelos even forwarded Atatürk's name for the 1934 Nobel Peace Prize,[118] Even after his fall from power, Greco-Turkish relations remained cordial. Indeed, Venizelos' successor Panagis Tsaldaris came to visit Atatürk in September 1933 and signed a more comprehensive agreement, called the Entente Cordiale, a stepping stone for the Balkan Pact.

Greek Premier Ioannis Metaxas said of Atatürk and the Turkish-Greek alliance, that "...Greece, which has the highest estimation of the renowned leader, heroic soldier, and enlightened creator of Turkey. We will never forget that President Atatürk was the true founder of the Turkish-Greek alliance based on a framework of common ideals and peaceful cooperation. He developed ties of friendship between the two nations which it would be unthinkable to dissolve. Greece will guard its fervent memories of this great man, who determined an unalterable future path for the noble Turkish nation."
Neighbours to the east
During the visit of Faisal I of Iraq in 1931.

From 1919, Afghanistan was in the midst of a reformation period under Amanullah Khan. Afghan Foreign Minister Mahmud Tarzi was a follower of Mustafa Kemal's domestic policy. He encouraged Amanullah Khan in social and political reform but urged that reforms should build upon the basis of a strong government. During the late 1920s, Anglo-Afghan relations soured over British fears of an Afghan-Soviet friendship. On 20 May 1928, Anglo-Afghan politics gained a positive perspective, when Amanullah Khan and the Queen were received by Mustafa Kemal in Constantinople. This meeting was followed by a Turkey-Afghanistan Friendship and Cooperation pact on 22 May 1928. Mustafa Kemal supported Afghanistan's integration into international organizations. In 1934, Afghanistan's relations with the international community gained a huge boost when it joined the League of Nations.[119] In 1937, King Zahir Shah became a signatory of the Treaty of Saadabad. Mahmud Tarzi received Mustafa Kemal's personal support until he died on 22 November 1933 in Istanbul.
During the visit of Reza Pahlavi I, The Shah of Iran.

Mustafa Kemal and Reza Shah had a common approach regarding British imperialism and its influence in their region, creating a slow but continuous rapprochement between Ankara and Tehran. Both governments sent diplomatic missions and messages of friendship to each other during the Turkish war of independence.[120] The policy of the Ankara government in this period was to give moral support in order to assure Iranian independence and territorial integrity.[121] The relations were strained after the abolishment of the Caliphate. Iran's Shi'a clergy did not accept Kemal's position. Iranian religious power centres perceived the real motive behind Atatürk's reforms was to undermine the power of the clergy.[121] An admirer of Mustafa Kemal and close student of his reforms, Reza Shah followed the same type of modernization efforts. By the mid-1930s, Reza Shah's efforts had upset the clergy throughout Iran, thus widening the gap between religion and government.[122] Mustafa Kemal feared the occupation and dismemberment of Iran as a multi-ethnic/multi-tribal society by Russia or Great Britain.[121] Like Mustafa Kemal, Reza Shah wanted to secure Iran's borders. Reza Shah visited him in 1934. In 1935, the draft of what would become the Treaty of Saadabad was paragraphed in Geneva, but the signing of it was delayed because of the border dispute between Iran and Iraq. Iran challenged the validity of both the Treaty of Erzerum and the Constantinople Protocol in 1934.

On 8 July 1937, Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan signed the Saadabad Pact at Tehran. The signatories undertook to preserve their common frontiers, to consult together in all matters of common interest and to commit no aggression against one another’s territory. The treaty united the Afghan king’s call for greater Oriental-Middle Eastern cooperation, Reza Shah's goal in securing relations with Turkey that would help Iran free herself from Soviet and British influence, and Mustafa Kemal's foreign policy of securing stability in the region. The immediate outcome was to deter Mussolini from adventures in the region.[123]
Turkish Straits
During the visit of King Edward VIII.

On 24 July 1923, the Treaty of Lausanne included the Lausanne Straits Agreement. The Lausanne Straits Agreement stated that the Dardanelles should remain open to all commercial vessels: seizure of foreign military vessels was subject to certain limitations during peacetime, and, even as a neutral state, Turkey could not limit any military passage during wartime. The Lausanne Straits Agreement stated that the waterway was to be demilitarized, and its management left to the Straits Commission. The demilitarized zone heavily restricted Turkey's domination and sovereignty over the Straits. The defence of Constantinople was impossible without having the sovereignty over the water that passed through it.

In March 1936, Hitler's reoccupation of the Rhineland gave Mustafa Kemal the opportunity to resume full control over the Straits. "The situation in Europe", he declared "is highly appropriate for such a move. We shall certainly achieve it".[124] Tevfik Rü?tü Aras, who was the foreign minister, initiated a move to revise the Straits' regime. Aras claimed that he was directed by the President, rather than his Prime Minister, Ismet Inönü. In?nü was worried about harming relations with Britain, France, and Balkan neighbors over the Straits. However, the signatories agreed to join the conference, since unlimited military passage had become unfavourable to Turkey with the changes in world politics. Mustafa Kemal demanded that the members of the Turkish Foreign Office devise a solution that would transfer full control over the waterway to Turkey.

On 20 July 1936, the Montreux Convention was signed, with the participation of Bulgaria, Great Britain, Australia, France, Japan, Romania, the Soviet Union, Turkey, Yugoslavia and Greece. It became the primary instrument governing the passage of commercial and war vessels through the Dardanelles Strait. It was ratified by the GNAT on 31 July 1936. It went into effect on 9 November 1936, and is still valid today.
Balkan Pact
During the visit of Alexander I of Yugoslavia in 1931.

Until the early 1930s, Turkey followed a modern neutral foreign policy with the West by developing joint friendship and neutrality agreements. These bilateral agreements were aligned with Mustafa Kemal's worldview. By the end of 1925, Turkey had signed fifteen joint agreements with Western states.

In the early 1930s, changes and developments in world politics required Turkey to make multilateral agreements to improve its security. Mustafa Kemal strongly believed that a close cooperation between the Balkan states based on the principle of equality would have an important effect on European politics. These states had been ruled by the Ottoman Empire for centuries, and had formed a powerful force. While the origins of the Balkan agreement may date back as far as 1925, the Balkan Pact came to being in the mid-1930s. Several important developments in the Balkan Peninsula and in Europe helped the original idea to materialize, such as improvements in the Turkish-Greek alliance and the rapprochement between Bulgaria and Yugoslavia.

The Balkan Pact was negotiated by Mustafa Kemal with Greece, Romania, and Yugoslavia. This mutual-defence agreement intended to guarantee the signatories' territorial integrity and political independence against attack by another Balkan state such as Bulgaria or Albania. It countered the increasingly aggressive foreign policy of fascist Italy and the effect of a potential Bulgarian alignment with Nazi Germany. He thought of the Balkan Pact as a medium of balance in the relations with the European countries.[125] Mustafa Kemal was particularly anxious to establish a region of security and alliances in the west of Turkey and in Balkan Europe, which would extend as far as Dobruja.[126]

The Balkan Pact provided for regular military and diplomatic consultations. It was regarded as a significant step forward in consolidating the free world's position in southeast Europe, although it contained no specific military commitments. The importance of the agreement was best displayed in the message which Atatürk sent to the Greek Premier, Ioannis Metaxas:
“ The borders of the allies in the Balkan Pact are a single border. Those who covet this border will encounter the burning beams of the sun. I recommend avoiding this. The forces that defend our borders are a single and inseparable force.[127] ”

It was signed by GNA on 28 Feb. The Greek and Yugoslav Parliaments ratified the agreement a few days after. The unanimously ratified Balkan pact became a reality on 18 May 1935 and lasted until 1940.

The Balkan Pact turned out to be ineffective for reasons that were beyond Atatürk’s control. What he wanted to prevent with the Balkan Pact was realized by Bulgaria’s attempt to put the Dobruja issue into the agenda after a series of international events ending with the Italian invasion of Albania on 7 April 1939. These conflicts spread rapidly, ending with World War II. The goal of Atatürk, to protect southeast Europe, failed with the dissolution of the pact. The only state which arose intact after the war was Atatürk's Republic of Turkey.
Issue of Hatay
Telegram sent by Atatürk after the local legislative assembly accepted his proposal for the Hatay State's flag.

Turkish Prime-Minister Ismet Inonu was very conscious of foreign policy issues. During the second half of the 1930s, Atatürk tried to form a closer relationship with Britain. The risks of this policy change put the two men at odds. The Hatay issue and the Lyon agreement were two important developments in foreign policy that played a significant role in the severing of relations between Atatürk and Ismet.

In 1936, Atatürk raised the "Issue of Hatay" at the League of Nations. Hatay was based on the old administrative unit of the Ottoman Empire called the Sanjak of Alexandretta. On behalf of the League of Nations, the representatives of France, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Belgium and Turkey prepared a constitution for Hatay, which established it as an autonomous sanjak within Syria. Despite some inter-ethnic violence, in the midst of 1938 an election was conducted by the local legislative assembly. The cities of Antakya (Antioch) and ?skenderun (Alexandretta) joined Turkey in 1939.
Economic policies

For conceptual analysis, see Economic reforms

Mustafa Kemal instigated economic policies to develop small and large scale businesses, but also to create social strata (industrial bourgeoisie along with the peasantry of Anatolia) that were virtually non-existent during the Ottoman Empire. The primary problem faced by the politics of his period was the lag in the development of political institutions and social classes which would steer such social and economic changes.[128] Mustafa Kemal's vision regarding early Turkish economic policy was apparent during the ?zmir Economic Congress of 1923 which was established before the signing of the Lausanne Treaty. The initial choices of Mustafa Kemal's economic policies reflected the realities of his period. After World War I, due to the lack of any real potential investors to open private sector factories and develop industrial production, Kemal established many state-owned factories for agriculture, machinery, and textile industries.
State intervention, 1923–1929
Atatürk and Celâl Bayar visiting the Bursa plant, which was established as a part of the cotton-related industry.

Mustafa Kemal and ?smet ?nönü pursuit of state controlled economical policies was guided by a national vision; they wanted to knit the country together, eliminate the foreign control of the economy, and improve communications. Constantinople, a trading port with international foreign enterprises, was abandoned and resources were channelled to other, less developed cities, in order to establish a more balanced development throughout the country.[129]

For Mustafa Kemal, as for his supporters, tobacco remained wedded to his policy in the pursuit of economic independence. Turkish tobacco was an important industrial crop, while its cultivation and manufacture were French monopolies under capitulations of the Ottoman Empire. The tobacco and cigarette trade was controlled by two French companies: the "Regie Compagnie interessee des tabacs de l'empire Ottoman" and "Narquileh tobacco."[130] The Ottoman Empire gave the tobacco monopoly to the Ottoman Bank as a limited company under the "Council of the Public Debt". Regie, as part of the Council of the Public Debt, had control over production, storing, and distribution (including export) with an unchallenged price control. Consequently, Turkish farmers were dependent on the company for their livelihood.[131] In 1925, this company was taken over by the state and named "Tekel". The control of tobacco was the biggest achievement of the Kemalist political machinery's "nationalization" of the economy for a country that did not produce oil. They accompanied this achievement with the development of the cotton industry, which peaked during the early 1930s. Cotton was the second biggest industrial crop in Turkey.

In 1924, with the initiative of Mustafa Kemal, the first Turkish bank ?? Bankas? was established. He was the first member of ?? Bankas?. The bank's creation was a response to the growing need for a truly national establishment and the birth of a banking system which was capable of backing up economic activities, managing funds accumulated as a result of policies providing savings incentives and, where necessary, extending resources which could trigger industrial impetus.

In 1927, Turkish State Railways was established. Because Mustafa Kemal considered the development of a national rail network as another important step in industrialization, it was given high priority. This institution developed an extensive railway network in a very short time. In 1927, Kemal also ordered the integration of road construction goals into development plans. The road network consisted of 13,885 km of ruined surface roads, 4.450 km of stabilized roads, and 94 bridges. In 1935, a new entity was established under the government called "Sose ve Kopruler Reisligi" which would drive development of new roads after World War II. However, in 1937, the 22,000 km of roads in Turkey augmented the railways.

The national group[clarification needed], which had Kemal as the leader, developed many projects within the first decade of the republic. However, the Turkish economy was based on agriculture, with primitive tools and methods; roads and transportation facilities were far from sufficient and management of the economy was inefficient. The Great Depression brought many changes to this picture.
Great Depression, 1929–1931
Atatürk supported large-scale government subsidized industrial complexes, such as Sümerbank, increasingly after the Great Depression.

The young republic, like the rest of the world, found itself in a deep economic crisis during the Great Depression. Mustafa Kemal reacted to conditions of this period by moving toward integrated economic polices, and establishing a central bank to control exchange rates. However, Turkey could not finance essential imports; its currency was shunned and zealous revenue officials seized the meagre possessions of peasants who could not pay their taxes.[129]

In 1929, Mustafa Kemal signed a treaty that resulted in the restructuring of the nation's debt with the Ottoman Public Debt Administration. He did not fault the Ottoman debt. He had to deal with the turbulent economic issues of the Great Depression along with the payment of the high debt known as the Ottoman public debt. Until the early 1930s, Turkish private business could not acquire exchange credits. It was impossible to integrate the Turkish economy without a solution to this problem. This increased the credibility of the new Republic.

In 1931, Mustafa Kemal's intention to establish the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey was realized. The bank's primary purpose was to have control over the exchange rate, and Ottoman Bank's role during its initial years as a central bank was phased out. Later specialized banks such as the Sümerbank (1932) and the Etibank (1935) were founded.

From the political economy perspective, Mustafa Kemal had to face the same problems which all countries faced: political upheaval. The establishment of a new party with a different economic perspective was needed; he asked Ali Fethi Okyar to fulfil. The Liberal Republican Party (August, 1930) came out with a liberal program and proposed that state monopolies should be ended, foreign capital should be attracted, and that state investment should be curtailed. Mustafa Kemal supported ?nönü's point of view: "it is impossible to attract foreign capital for essential development." In 1931, he proclaimed: "In the economic area ...the programme of the party is statism."[132] However, the effect of free republicans was felt strongly and state intervention became more moderate, more akin to a form of state capitalism. One of his radical left-wing supporters, Yakup Kadri Karaosmano?lu from the Kadro (The Cadre) movement, claimed that Mustafa Kemal found a third way between capitalism and socialism.[133]
Liberalization and planned growth, 1931–1939
Atatürk at the Etimesgut Airport in Ankara, built by the Turkish Aircraft Association. His famous quote, "the future is in the skies", is embossed today on the airport's façade.

The first (1929–1933) and second five year economic plans were performed under the supervision of Mustafa Kemal. The first five year economic plan promoted consumer substitution industries. However, these economic plans changed drastically with the death of Kemal and the rise of World War II. Subsequent governments took measures that harmed the economic productivity of Turkey in various ways.[134] The achievements of the 1930s were credited to early (1920s) implementation of the economic system based on the national policies of Mustafa Kemal and his team.[135]

In 1931, Mustafa Kemal watched the first national aircraft, MMV-1, develop. He realized the important role of aviation. In his words, "the future lies in the skies".[136] Turkish Aeronautical Association was founded in 16 February 1925 by his directive.[137] He ordered the establishment of the Turkish Aircraft Association Lottery. Instead of the traditional raffle prizes, this new lottery paid money prizes. The major part of its income was used to establish a new factory fund aviation projects. Mustafa Kemal did not see the flight of the first Turkish military aircraft built at the factory. Operational American Curtiss Hawk fighters were being produced soon after his death and before the onset of World War II.

In 1932, liberal economist Celal Bayar became the Minister of Economy at Mustafa Kemal's request and served until 1937.[138] During this period, the country moved toward a mixed economy with its first private initiatives. Textile, sugar, paper and steel factories (financed by a loan from Britain) were the private sectors of the period. Besides these government owned power plants, banks, and insurance companies were established.

In 1935, the first Turkish cotton print factory "Nazilli Calico print factory" opened. Cotton planting was promoted to furnish raw material for future factory settlements, part of the industrialization process.[139] Nazilli became a major center beginning with the establishment of cotton mills and was followed by a calico print factory by 1935.[140][141]

On 25 October 1937, Mustafa Kemal appointed Celal Bayar as the prime minister of the 9th government. Integrated economic policies reached their peak with the signing of the 1939 Treaty with Britain and France.[134] This signaled a turning point in Turkish history.[134] It was the first step towards an alliance with the "West".[134] Celal Bayar served as prime minister until Mustafa Kemal's death. The differences of opinion between Inönü (state control) and Celal Bayar (liberal) came to the forefront after ?nönü became president in 1938. On 25 January 1939, Prime Minister Bayar resigned.

Mustafa Kemal supported the establishment of the automobile industry. He wanted it to become a center in the region. The motto of the Turkish automobile association was: "The Turkish driver is a man of the most exquisite sensitivities."[142]

During 1935, Turkey was becoming an industrial society on the Western European model set out by Atatürk.[143] At the time of his death, most regions of Turkey had viable micro-economic stability and some macro economic stability. These signs of sound economic policies were marked by the first-ever emergence of local banks. However, the gap between Mustafa Kemal’s goals and the achievements of the socio-political structure of the country was not closed.[143]
Personal life
See also: Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's personal life
Mustafa Kemal (Atatürk) and his wife Lâtife U?akl?gil (U??aki) in Afyonkarahisar, March 23, 1923.

On 29 January 1923, Mustafa Kemal married Latife U?akl?gil; they were divorced on 5 August 1925.[144] He never remarried. During his lifetime, Atatürk adopted twelve daughters and a son. In his leisure time, he enjoyed reading and writing (books and a personal journal), horseback riding, chess, and swimming. He was also an avid dancer and enjoyed both the waltz and traditional Zeybek folk dances.

During 1937, indications that Atatürk's health was worsening started to appear. In early 1938, while he was on a trip to Yalova, he suffered from a serious illness. He went to ?stanbul for treatment, where he was diagnosed with cirrhosis of the liver due to heavy alcohol consumption.[145][146] During his stay in ?stanbul, he made an effort to keep up with his regular lifestyle for a while. He died on 10 November 1938, at the age of 57, in the Dolmabahçe Palace, where he spent his last days.[147] The clock in the bedroom where he died is still set to the time of his death, 9:05 in the morning. Atatürk's funeral called forth both sorrow and pride in Turkey, and seventeen countries sent special representatives, while nine contributed armed detachments to the cortège.[94] Mustafa Kemal's remains were originally laid to rest in the Ethnography Museum of Ankara, and transferred on 10 November 1953, 15 years after his death in a 42-ton sarcophagus, to a mausoleum that overlooks Ankara,[148] An?tkabir. In his will, he donated all of his possessions to the Republican People's Party, providing that the yearly interest of his funds would be used to look after his sister Makbule and his adopted children, and fund the higher education of the children of ?smet ?nönü. The remainder of this yearly interest was willed to the Turkish Language Association and the Turkish Historical Society.
Legacy
Turkey
An?tkabir, the mausoleum of Kemal Atatürk, in Ankara, Turkey.

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk is commemorated by many memorials throughout Turkey, such as the Atatürk International Airport in Istanbul, the Atatürk Bridge over the Golden Horn (Haliç), the Atatürk Dam, and Atatürk Stadium. Atatürk statues have been erected in all Turkish cities by Turkish Government, and most towns have their own memorial to him. His face and name are seen and heard everywhere in Turkey; his portrait can be seen in all public buildings, in all schools and classrooms, on all school books, on all Turkish lira banknotes, and in the homes of many Turkish families.[149] At the exact time of his death, on every 10 November, at 09:05 a.m., most vehicles and people in the country's streets pause for one minute in remembrance.[150]
Atatürk's statues are erected in every town of Turkey. The Monument of the Republic, crafted by the famous Italian sculptor Pietro Canonica, is located at the Taksim Square in Istanbul.
Outlawing insults to his reminiscence

In 1951, the Turkish Parliament issued a law (5816) outlawing insults to his reminiscence (Turkish: Hat?ras?) or destruction of objects representing him.[151] The demarcation between a criticism and an insult was defined as a political argument and the minister of Justice (a political position) was assigned in Article 5 to execute the law rather than the public prosecutor.

In 2007 Youtube, geocities, and several blogger webpages was blocked by a Turkish court due to violation of this law. A government website [2] is also founded to denounce the websites those violate this law.

In 2010 the French-based NGO Reporters Without Borders declared that the Turkish laws to protect the memory of Kemal Ataturk are in contradiction with the current European Union standards of freedom of speech in news media.[152]
Worldwide

In 1981, the centennial of Atatürk's birth, his memory was honoured by the United Nations and UNESCO, which declared it The Atatürk Year in the World and adopted the Resolution on the Atatürk Centennial. The Atatürk Memorial in Wellington, New Zealand (which also serves as a memorial to the ANZAC troops who died at Gallipoli); the Atatürk Memorial in the place of honour on ANZAC Parade in Canberra, Australia; the Atatürk Forest in Israel; and the Atatürk Square in Rome, Italy, are only a few examples. He has roads named after him in several countries, like the Kemal Atatürk Marg in New Delhi, India, Kemal Atatürk Avenue in Dhaka, Bangladesh, the Atatürk Avenue in the heart of Islamabad in Pakistan, the Atatürk Road in the southern city of province of Sindh of Pakistan called Larkana where Atatürk visited back in 1923, Mustafá Kemal Atatürk street in the Naco district of Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, and the street and memorial Atatürk in the Amsterdam-Noord borough of Amsterdam, Netherlands. The entrance to Princess Royal Harbour in Albany, Western Australia is named Atatürk Channel. Barack Obama, the 44th President of the United States, who visited his tomb and praised him, also expressed his view regarding Atatürk's legacy at his speech towards "the Muslim world" by stating Atatürk's "greatest legacy is Turkey's strong and secular democracy, and that is the work that this assembly carries on today."[153][154]
See also
Turkey portal
Biography portal
Politics portal

* Kemalism
* Revolution
* State socialism
* Young Turks
* Pan Turkism
* List of people on the cover of Time Magazine: 1920s – 24 Mar. 1923
* Chronology of the Turkish War of Independence
* List of high-ranking commanders of the Turkish War of Independence

Notes

1. ^ Zürcher, Turkey : a modern history, 142
2. ^ Mango, ibid, p. 29, about neighbourhoods of Salonique, cf. Meropi Anastassiadou, Salonique, 1830–1912: une ville ottomane à l'âge des Réformes, Brill, 1997, ISBN 90-04-10798-3, p. 71. (French)
3. ^ Cemal Çelebi Granda, Cemal Granda anlat?yor, Pal Medya ve Organizasyon, 2007, ISBN 9789944203012, p.
4. ^ Andrew Mango Atatürk: The Biography of the Founder of Modern Turkey, Overlook Press, 2002, ISBN 9781585673346, p. 25, p.27ff. – Feyzullah's family is said to have come from the country near Vodina (now Edhessa in western Greek Macedonia). The surname Sofuzade, meaning son of a pious man, suggests that the ancestors of Zübeyde and Ali R?za had a similar background. Cemil Bozok, son of Salih Bozok, who was a distant cousin of Atatürk and, later, his ADC, claims to have been related to both Ali R?za's and Zübeyde's families. This would mean that the families of Atatürk's parents were interrelated. Cemil Bozok also notes that his paternal grandfather, Safer Efendi, was of Albanian origin. This may have a bearing on the vexed question of Atatürk's ethnic origin. Atatürk's parents and relatives all used Turkish as their mother tongue. This suggests that some at least of their ancestors had originally come from Turkey, since local Muslims of Albanian and Slav origin who had no ethnic connection with Turkey spoke Albanian, Serbo-Croat or Bulgarian, at least so long as they remained in their native land., But in looks Ataturk resembled local Albanians and Slavs.[...] But there is no evidence that either Ali Riza or Zübeyde was descended from such Turkish nomads. page 28; It is much more likely that Atatürk inherited his looks from his Balkan ancestors.[...] But Albanians and Slavs are likely to have figured among his ancestors.
5. ^ "Turkey: The land a dictator turned into a democracy". Time. 12 October 1953. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,860057-2,00.html. Retrieved 19 May 2010.
6. ^ Patrick Kinross: Ataturk: the Rebirth of a Nation. London: Phoenix, 2001, p. 3.
7. ^ Gershom Scholem, "Doenmeh", Encyclopaedia Judaica, Second Edition, Volume 5: Coh-Doz, Macmillan Reference USA, Thomson Gale, 2007, ISBN 0-02-865933-3, p. 732.
8. ^ Mango, Andrew, Ataturk: The Biography of the Founder of Modern Turkey, (Overlook TP, 2002), p. 27.
9. ^ Lou Giaffo: Albania: Eye of the Balkan Vortex[page needed]
10. ^ a b Jackh, Ernest, The Rising Crescent, (Goemaere Press, 2007), p. 31, Turkish mother and Albanian father
11. ^ a b Isaac Frederick Marcosson, Turbulent years, Ayer Publishing, 1969, p. 144.
12. ^ Richmond, Yale, From Da to Yes: understanding the East Europeans, (Intercultural Press Inc., 1995), 212.
13. ^ Falih F?rk? Atay, Çankaya: Atatürk'ün do?umundan ölümüne kadar, Beta?, ?stanbul, 1984, p. 17. (Turkish)
14. ^ Vamik D. Volkan, Norman Itzkowitz, Ölümsüz Atatürk (Immortal Ataturk), Ba?lam Yay?nlar?, 1998, ISBN 975-7696-97-8, p. 37, dipnote no. 6 (Atay, 1980, s. 17)
15. ^ ?evket Süreyya Aydemir, Tek Adam: Mustafa Kemal, Birinci Cilt: 1881–1919, 14th edition, Remzi Kitabevi, 1997, ISBN 975-14-0212-3, p. 31. (Turkish)
16. ^ Afet Inan, Atatürk hakk?nda hât?ralar ve belgeler, Türk Tarih Kurumu Bas?mevi, 1959, p. 8.
17. ^ "Mustafa Kemal Atatürk". Turkish Embassy website. Archived from the original on September 27, 2007. http://web.archive.org/web/20070927211519/http://www.turkishembassy.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=300&Itemid=317. Retrieved 2007-08-07.
18. ^ Ali Fuat Cebesoy, S?n?f arkada??m Atatürk: okul ve genç subayl?k hât?ralar?, ?nk?lâp ve Aka Kitabevleri, 1967, p. 6. Benim ad?m Mustafa. Senin ad?n da Musfata. Arada bir fark olmal?, ne dersin, senin ad?n?n sonuna bir de Kemal koyal?m.
19. ^ Mango, Atatürk, p. 37.
20. ^ a b c d T.C. Genelkurmay Harp Tarihi Ba?kanl??? Yay?nlar?, Türk ?stiklâl Harbine Kat?lan Tümen ve Daha Üst Kademlerdeki Komutanlar?n Biyografileri, Genkurmay Ba?kanl??? Bas?mevi, Ankara, 1972, p. 1. (Turkish)
21. ^ Falih F?rk? Atay, Çankaya: Atatürk'ün do?umundan ölümüne kadar, Beta?, ?stanbul, 1984, p. 29. (Turkish)
22. ^ The Encyclopædia Britannica, Vol.7, Edited by Hugh Chisholm, (1911), 3; "Constantinople, the capital of the Turkish Empire...".
23. ^ Mango, ibid, p. 37.
24. ^ a b T.C. Genelkurmay Ba?kanl??? Yay?nlar?, ibid, p. 2.
25. ^ http://albania.dyndns.org/Presse/2004/01102004.htm "1910, Albania broke a major uprising. Minister of War, Shefqet Mahmut Pasha, was personally involved in its printing. For this purpose decided to call his war headquarters Qemali Mustafa who was known as one of the generals prepared and laid him drafting the plan of operations. Mustafa at this time was in the Fifth Army Headquarters in Thessaloniki."
26. ^ http://www.zeriyt.com/mustafa-ataturku-krijuesi-i-turqise-moderne-t37510.0.html M. Kamal had assisted in the military operation in Albania in 1910.
27. ^ http://www.albanianhistory.net/texts20_1/AH1912_3.html
28. ^ Enstehung und Ausbau der Königsdiktatur in Albanien, 1912-1939 Von Michael Schmidt-Neke
29. ^ http://www.albislam.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1137:prezantim-per-librin-kujtime-&catid=580:libri&Itemid=774 "I remember well the meeting very interesting, I had casually with Mustafa Qemali in 1910, at the time, still a mere lieutenant.
30. ^ KUJTIME nga: Eqrem Bej Vlora. Ekrem Bey Vlora, Lebenserinnerungen - Teilband II: 1912-1925
31. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Ana Britannica (1987) Vol. 2 (Ami - Avr): Atatürk, Mustafa Kemal. Page: 490.
32. ^ The History of the Italian-Turkish War, William Henry Beehler, page 96
33. ^ a b The History of the Italian-Turkish War, William Henry Beehler, page 14
34. ^ Richard C. Hall, The Balkan Wars 1912–1913: Prelude to the First World War, Routledge, 2002, p. 81.
35. ^ Edward J. Erickson, Defeat in Detail: The Ottoman Army in the Balkans, 1912–1913, Praeger, 2003, ISBN 0-275-97888-5, p. 255.
36. ^ a b Lengyel, They called him Atatürk, 68
37. ^ Kinross, Atatürk: The Rebirth of a Nation, 100
38. ^ Mustafa Kemal Pasha's speech on his arrival in Ankara in November 1919
39. ^ Andrew Mango, Atatürk, John Murray, 1999, ISBN 978-0-7195-6592-2, p. 214.
40. ^ Ahmad, The Making of Modern Turkey, 50
41. ^ ?. ???????. ??????. Moscow, 1995, p. 241.
42. ^ editorial staff. "A short history of AA". Anadolu Ajans? Genel Müdürlü?ü. http://www.aa.com.tr/tarihce_en/. Retrieved 2008-01-01. "Ikdam newspaper dated 9 August 1921, reproducing the dispatches of AA dated 5 August and 6th, 1921, announced that Mustafa Kemal Pasha was promoted to Chief Commander"
43. ^ Greco-Turkish wars, Britannica CD 99
44. ^ James, Edwin L. "Kemal Won't Insure Against Massacres," New York Times, September 11, 1922.
45. ^ Shaw, History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey, 365
46. ^ Mango, Atatürk, 394
47. ^ a b Mango, Atatürk, 367
48. ^ Gerd Nonneman, Analyzing Middle East foreign policies and the relationship with Europe, Published 2005 Routledge, p. 204 ISBN 0714684279
49. ^ Webster, The Turkey of Atatürk: social process in the Turkish reformation, 245
50. ^ Mango, Atatürk, 391–392
51. ^ a b Mango, Atatürk, 362
52. ^ Landau, Atatürk and the Modernization of Turkey, 252
53. ^ Mango, Atatürk, 501
54. ^ a b c Koçak, Cemil (2005) "Parliament Membership during the Single-Party System in Turkey (1925–1945)", European Journal of Turkish Studies
55. ^ John O. Voll: Professor of Islamic history at Georgetown University http://www.nationalinterest.org/Article.aspx?id=13296
56. ^ Mango, Atatürk, 403
57. ^ a b Mango, Atatürk, 401
58. ^ a b c d e Majid Khadduri (2006) War and peace in the law of Islam, The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., ISBN 1584776951 page 290-291
59. ^ Mango, Atatürk, 404
60. ^ Eksi, Oktay (2008-04-16). "Paralardaki resimler". Hurriyet. http://hurarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/goster/haber.aspx?id=8711441&yazarid=1. Retrieved 2008-04-24. "?smet Pa?a "kurumla?ma" ile neyi kastetti?ini de ?öyle anlatt?:
Biz Cumhuriyeti kurdu?umuz zaman onu ya?at?p ya?atamayaca??m?z en büyük sorun idi. Çünkü Saltanat?n ve Hilafetin la?v?na kar?? olanlar?n say?s? çoktu ve hedefleri de Cumhuriyetti. Cumhuriyetin 10 ya??na bast???n? görmek o yüzden önemliydi. Nitekim büyük Atatürk'ün emriyle 10'uncu y?l kutlamalar? çok büyük bir bayram oldu. Biz de Cumhuriyetin ve devletin kurumla?t???n? göstermeye bundan sonra hep itina ettik..."
61. ^ a b c d e f g h i Wolf-Gazo, John Dewey in Turkey: An Educational Mission, 15–42.
62. ^ Republic Of Turkey Ministry Of National Education. "Atatürk’s views on education". T.C. Government. http://www.meb.gov.tr/Stats/apk2001ing/Section_0/AtaturksViewon.htm. Retrieved 2007-11-20.
63. ^ a b c ??demir, Atatürk, 165–170
64. ^ Quoted in Atatürkism, Volume 1 (Istanbul: Office of the Chief of General Staff, 1982), 126.
65. ^ Patrick Kinross, Atatürk, The Rebirth of a Nation, 397
66. ^ a b c d e f Mango, Ataturk, 418
67. ^ Weiker, Book Review of Zürcher's "Political Opposition in the Early Turkish Republic: The Progressive Republican Party, 1924–1925", 297–298
68. ^ Touraj Atabaki, Erik Jan Zürcher, 2004, Men of Order: authoritarian modernization under Atatürk and Reza Shah, I.B.Tauris, ISBN 1860644260, page 207
69. ^ http://www.tsk.mil.tr/eng/Anitkabir/p24.html TSK Anitkabir sayfa 24[dead link]
70. ^ a b Daisy Hilse Dwyer, (1990), "Law and Islam in the Middle East", page 77, ISBN 9780897891516
71. ^ Atillasoy, Atatürk : The First President and Founder of the Turkish Republic, 13.
72. ^ Mango, Atatürk, 164
73. ^ Tüfekçi, Universality of Atatürk's philosophy
74. ^ Kinross, Ataturk, The Rebirth of a Nation, p. 343
75. ^ Atillasoy, Atatürk : first president and founder of the Turkish Republic, 15
76. ^ Dundar, Can (2005-04-25). "Türke?, Atatürk'ün imzas?n? hat?rlatt?" (in Turkish). Milliyet. http://www.milliyet.com.tr/2005/04/25/yazar/dundar.html. "Atatürk'ün imzas?n? bir Ermeni güzel yaz? hocas?n?n çizdi?ini duymu? muydun?"
77. ^ Özelli, The Evolution of the Formal Educational System and Its Relation to Economic Growth Policies in the First Turkish Republic, 77–92
78. ^ Mango, Atatürk, 536
79. ^ ?nan, Atatürk Hakk?nda Hat?ralar ve Belgeler, 260
80. ^ a b "About Us". Archived from the original on November 17, 2007. http://web.archive.org/web/20071117232115/http://www.ted.org.tr/EN/BelgeGoster.aspx?17A16AE30572D313AAF6AA849816B2EF01E9BE68C047FEF5. Retrieved 2008-02-01.
81. ^ Saikal, Democratization in the Middle East: Experiences, Struggles, Challenges, 95
82. ^ a b Geoffrey L. Lewis (1999), The Turkish Language Reform: A Catastrophic Success, Oxford University Press ISBN 0198238568 page 66
83. ^ "Turks Teach New Theories". The New York Times (Istanbul). 1936-02-09.
84. ^ Laut (2002)
85. ^ a b Cleveland, A History of the Modern Middle East, 181
86. ^ a b c Michael Radu, (2003), "Dangerous Neighborhood: Contemporary Issues in Turkey's Foreign Relations", page 125, ISBN 9780765801661
87. ^ S. M. Zwemer: Translations of the Koran, The Moslem World, 1915
88. ^ M. Brett Wilson, "The First Translations of the Qur'an in Modern Turkey (1924–1938)," International Journal of Middle East Studies, volume 41, issue 03, pp. 419–435.
89. ^ Elmal?l? Hamdi Yaz?r, (1935), "Hak dini Kur'an dili: Yeni mealli Turkce tefsir" 9 volumes, printed in Istanbul
90. ^ Paydak, Selda (January 2000). "Interview with Semiha Berksoy". Representation of the European Commission to Turkey. Archived from the original on 2003-04-18. http://web.archive.org/web/20030418082022/http://www.deltur.cec.eu.int/english/guncel/ghaber-jan00_18.html. Retrieved 2007-02-11.
91. ^ Omur, Modernity and Islam: Experiences of Turkish Women
92. ^ Atatürk, Vatanda? ?çin Medeni Bilgiler
93. ^ ?nan, Medeni bilgiler ve M. Kemal Atatürk'ün el yaz?lar?
94. ^ a b Mango, Atatürk 526
95. ^ Prof. Dr. Hamza Ero?lu. "Peace at home and peace in the world" (in Turkish). http://www.atam.gov.tr/index.php?Page=DergiIcerik&IcerikNo=72. Retrieved 2008-01-01. "“Yurtta Sulh” her?eyden önce ülkede, o insan?n, insanca ya?amas?n?, insanl?k t?ynetinin gere?inin tan?nmas?n? ifade eder"."
96. ^ Enver Ziya Karal (in Turkish). Atatürk’ten Dü?ünceler. p. 123. "“Haricî siyaset bir heyet-i içtimaiyenin te?ekkülü dahilisi ile s?k? surette alâkadard?r. Çünkü te?ekkül-ü dahiliyeye istinat etmeyen haricî siyasetler daima mahkûm kal?rlar. Bir heyet-i içtimaiyenin te?ekkül-ü dahilisi ne kadar kuvvetli olursa, siyaset-i hariciyesi de o nisbette kavi ve rasin olur.”"
97. ^ a b Peter Sluglett, "The Primacy of Oil in Britain’s Iraq Policy", in the book "Britain in Iraq: 1914–1932" London: Ithaca Press, 1976, pp. 103–116
98. ^ Can Dundar. "Atatürk ya?asayd?" (in Turkish). http://www.candundar.com.tr/index.php?Did=766. Retrieved 2008-01-01. "... Ata'n?n öncelikli d?? politika sorununun Musul oldu?unu söylüyor. Musul'u b?rakmama konusunda aktif bir politika izlenmesinden yana oldu?unu belirtiyor..."
99. ^ Harold Courtenay Armstrong Gray Wolf, Mustafa Kemal: An Intimate Study of a Dictator. page 225
100. ^ Olson, Robert W. (1989) The Emergence of Kurdish Nationalism and the Sheikh Said Rebellion, 1880–1925, p.45
101. ^ Kinross, 401
102. ^ ASD: Speeches and statements by Ataturk, volume I pages 361–363 published by Ataturk Culture, language and history Higher Institute, Ankara 1989
103. ^ Andrew Mango, Atatürk and the Kurds, Middle Eastern Studies, Vol.35, No.4, 1999, 20
104. ^ ????????????? ????? (the Soviet Foreign Minisrty's magazine). Moscow, 1963, ? 11, pp. 147-148. The first publication of Kemal's letter to Lenin in excerpts, in Russian.
105. ^ ????????????? ?????. Moscow, 1963, ? 11, p. 148.
106. ^ a b c Y?lmaz Altu?, Foreign Policy Of Atatürk, Ataturk arastirma merkezi dergisi, Vol VI, No 16, November 1989
107. ^ ?. ???????. ??????. Moscow, 1995, p. 227-228.
108. ^ ?. ???????. ??????. Moscow, 1995, p. 228.
109. ^ Y?lmaz Altu?, Türk Devrim Tarihi Dersim, 1919–1938, 1980 s. p. 136.
110. ^ John P. Kinross. Atatürk: a biography of Mustafa Kemal, father of modern Turkey. New York, 1965, p. 464.
111. ^ ???, 1-st edition, Moscow, Vol. 55, 1947, column 374.
112. ^ ???, 1-st edition, Moscow, Vol. 55, 1947, column 377.
113. ^ a b "Oh, What Happiness!". Time Magazine: pp. 37–39. 6 November 1933. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,746241-1,00.html. Retrieved 2007-08-07.
114. ^ ???, 2-st edition, Moscow, Vol. 20, 1953, p. 504.
115. ^ Karamanlis, 1995, p. 95-97
116. ^ Sosyal, Ismail, 1983, "Turkey's Diplomatic treaties", TTK, Ankara page 29
117. ^ Clogg, Richard (2002). A Concise History of Greece. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521004799. p. 107
118. ^ Nobel Foundation. The Nomination Database for the Nobel Prize in Peace, 1901–1955.[1]
119. ^ Jentleson, Bruce W.; Paterson, Thomas G. (1997). The American Journal of International Law. Oxford University Press. p. 24. ISBN 0195110552.
120. ^ Narli, Nilüfer (1993): "Turco-Iranian Relations from the Islamic Revolution to Gulf War and Beyond: Co-operation or Competition in the Muslim World". CEMOTI. (15): 265–295
121. ^ a b c Gokhan Cetinsaya "Essential friends and natural enemies: the historical roots of Turkish-Iranian relations." Middle East Review of International Affairs Volume 7, No. 3 – September 2003
122. ^ Rajaee, Farhang, Islamic Values and World View: Farhang Khomeyni on Man, the State and International Politics, Volume XIII (PDF), University Press of America. ISBN 0-8191-3578-X
123. ^ Mango, Ataturk, page 510
124. ^ Sosyal, Ismail, 1983, "Turkey's Diplomatic treaties", TTK, Ankara page 493
125. ^ Yilmaz Altuð, "Atatürk'ün Dis Politikasý," B.Ü. Uluslararasi Atatürk Konferansý Tebligleri, 10–11 November 1980, Vol. II, Istanbul 1981, p. 486.
126. ^ Þevket Süreyya Aydemir, Tek Adam, Vol. 3, Ýstanbul 1988, p. 331.
127. ^ Atatürk'ün Milli Dýþ Politikasý, Vol. 2, p. 355
128. ^ Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies, 347–357
129. ^ a b Mango, Atatürk, 470
130. ^ Shaw, History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey, 232–233.
131. ^ Aysu, Abdullah (2003-01-29). "Tütün, ?çki ve Tekel" (in Turkish). B?A Haber Merkezi. http://www.bianet.org/2003/01/30/16340.htm. Retrieved 2007-10-10.
132. ^ Ibrahim Kaya, Social Theory and Later Modernities, page 90
133. ^ Mango, Atatürk, 478
134. ^ a b c d Barlas, Etatism and Diplomacy in Turkey: Economic and Foreign Policy Strategies in an Uncertain World, 1929–1939
135. ^ Emrence, Turkey in economic crisis (1927–1930): a panoramic vision. Journal Middle Eastern Studies
136. ^ "Skylife". http://www.thy.com/en-INT/skylife/archive/en/2000_1/konu10.htm#1. Retrieved 2007-11-26.
137. ^ "History of Turkish Aeronautical Association". http://www.thk.org.tr/yeni/tarihce/tarihceeng.htm. Retrieved 2007-11-26.
138. ^ Dilek Barlas, Etatism and Diplomacy in Turkey: Economic and Foreign Policy Strategies p. 61
139. ^ Webster, The Turkey of Atatürk: Social Process in the Turkish Reformation, 260
140. ^ Do?an, Formation of factory settlements within Turkish industrialization and modernization in 1930s: Nazilli printing factory
141. ^ Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Culture and Tourism. "Ayd?n — Historical Ruins". T.C. Government. http://www.kultur.gov.tr/EN/BelgeGoster.aspx?17A16AE30572D313679A66406202CCB09837F9A3538A2623. Retrieved 2007. "Nazilli cotton print factory was established over an area of 65.000 m2 on the Nazilli Bozdo?an highway. It is the "first Turkish cotton print factory" the foundation of which was laid on 25 August 1935 and which was opened by Atatürk with great ceremony."
142. ^ Stone, Norman "Talking Turkey". National Interest, Fall2000, Issue 61.
143. ^ a b Eastham, The Turkish Development Plan: The First Five Years, 132–136
144. ^ Akhtar, Salman (2008). The Crescent and the Couch: Cross-Currents Between Islam and Psychoanalysis. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 68. ISBN 0765705745.
145. ^ Volkan, Vamik D. (1981). "'Immortal' Atatürk—Narcissism and Creativity in a Revolutionary Leader". The Psychoanalytic Study of Society 9: 221–255.
146. ^ Post, Jerrold M.; Robert S. Robins (1995). When Illness Strikes the Leader: The Dilemma of the Captive King. Yale UP. p. 84. ISBN 9780300063141. http://books.google.com/?id=SvU-aEsPWdoC&pg=PA84#v=onepage&q=.
147. ^ Atatürk'ün Hayat? (Atatürk's Life). Ministry of Culture and Tourism (Turkey) (Turkish).
148. ^ "The Burial of Atatürk". Time Magazine: pp. 37–39. 23 November 1953. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,860125,00.html. Retrieved 2007-08-07.
149. ^ Navaro-Yashin, Yael (2002). Faces of the State: Secularism and Public Life in Turkey. Princeton University Press. pp. 196–99. ISBN 0691088454.
150. ^ Morrison, Terry; Conaway, Wayne A. (1994). Kiss, Bow, Or Shake Hands: How to Do Business in Sixty Countries. Adams Media. p. 392. ISBN 1558504443.
151. ^ Yonah, Alexander (2007). Turkey: Terrorism, Civil Rights, and the European Union. Routledge. p. 137. ISBN 0415441633.
152. ^ Time to break out of legislative straitjacket that is stifling media freedom, Reporters Sans Frontières, December 1, 2010
153. ^ Chen, Edwin (7 April 2009). "Obama Praises Modern Turkey’s Founder Ataturk". http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aau7JxTiWhW8&refer=home. Retrieved 8 April 2009.
154. ^ RAUM, TOM (6 April 2009). "Obama to Muslim world: No US war with Islam". http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090406/ap_on_go_pr_wh/eu_obama. Retrieved 8 April 2009. [dead link]

References

Prints

* Ahmad, Feroz (1993). The Making of Modern Turkey. London; New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0415078351.
* Armstrong, Harold Courtenay (1972). Grey Wolf, Mustafa Kemal: An Intimate Study of a Dictator. Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press. ISBN 978-0836969627.
* Atillasoy, Yüksel (2002). Atatürk: First President and Founder of the Turkish Republic. Woodside, NY: Woodside House. ISBN 978-0971235342.
* Barber, Noel (1988). Lords of the Golden Horn: From Suleiman the Magnificent to Kemal Ataturk. London: Arrow. ISBN 978-0099539506.
* Barlas, Dilek (1998). Statism and Diplomacy in Turkey: Economic and Foreign Policy Strategies in an Uncertain World, 1929–1939. New York: Brill Academic Publishers. ISBN 978-9004108554.
* Cleveland, William L (2004). A History of the Modern Middle East. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. ISBN 978-0813340487.
* Do?an, Ça?atay Emre (2003) (in Turkish). Formation of Factory Settlements Within Turkish Industrialization and Modernization in 1930s: Nazilli Printing Factory. Ankara: Middle East Technical University. OCLC 54431696.
* Huntington, Samuel P. (2006). Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, Conn.; London: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300116205.
* ??demir, Ulu?; Mango, Andrew (translation) (1963). Atatürk. Ankara: Turkish National Commission for UNESCO. pp. 165–170. OCLC 75604149.
* ?nan, Ay?e Afet (2007) (in Turkish). Atatürk Hakk?nda Hat?ralar ve Belgeler. Istanbul: Türkiye ?? Bankas? Kültür Yay?nlar?. ISBN 9944881401.
* ?nan, Ay?e Afet; Sevim, Ali; Süslü, Azmi; Tural, M Akif (1998) (in Turkish). Medeni bilgiler ve M. Kemal Atatürk'ün el Yaz?lar?. Ankara: AKDTYK Atatürk Ara?t?rma Merkezi. ISBN 978-9751612762.
* Kinross, Patrick (2003). Atatürk: The Rebirth of a Nation. London: Phoenix Press. ISBN 978-1842125991. OCLC 55516821.
* Kinross, Patrick (1979). The Ottoman Centuries: The Rise and Fall of the Turkish Empire. New York: Morrow. ISBN 978-0688080938.
* Landau, Jacob M (1983). Atatürk and the Modernization of Turkey. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. ISBN 978-0865319868.
* Lengyel, Emil (1962). They Called Him Atatürk. New York: The John Day Co. OCLC 1337444.
* Mango, Andrew (2002) [1999]. Ataturk: The Biography of the Founder of Modern Turkey (Paperback ed.). Woodstock, NY: Overlook Press, Peter Mayer Publishers, Inc. ISBN 1-58567-334-x.
* Mango, Andrew (2004). Atatürk. London: John Murray. ISBN 978-0719565922.
* Saikal, Amin; Schnabel, Albrecht (2003). Democratization in the Middle East: Experiences, Struggles, Challenges. Tokyo: United Nations University Press. ISBN 978-9280810851. http://books.google.com/?id=qFhU3kWXLvEC&printsec=frontcover&dq=ataturk+and+islam.
* Shaw, Stanford Jay; Shaw, Ezel Kural (1976–1977). History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521212809.
* Spangnolo, John (1992). The Modern Middle East in Historical Perspective: Essays in Honour of Albert Hourani. Oxford: Middle East Centre, St. Antony's College. ISBN 978-0863721649. OCLC 80503960.
* Tunçay, Mete (1972) (in Turkish). Mesaî : Halk ?ûrâlar F?rkas? Program?, 1920. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi. OCLC 1926301.
* Tüfekçi, Gürbüz D (1981). Universality of Atatürk's Philosophy. Ankara: Pan Matbaac?l?k. OCLC 54074541.
* Yapp, Malcolm (1987). The Making of the Modern Near East, 1792–1923. London ; New York: Longman. ISBN 978-0582493803.
* Webster, Donald Everett (1973). The Turkey of Atatürk; Social Process in the Turkish Reformation. New York: AMS Press. ISBN 978-0404563332.
* Zürcher, Erik Jan (2004). Turkey: A Modern History. London; New York: I.B. Tauris. ISBN 978-1850433996.

Journals

* Eastham, J. K. (March 1964). "The Turkish Development Plan: The First Five Years". The Economic Journal (New York: Macmillan) 74 (298): 132–136. doi:10.2307/2228117. ISSN 0013-0133. http://jstor.org/stable/2228117.
* Emrence, Cem (2003). "Turkey in Economic Crisis (1927–1930): A Panaromic Vision". Middle Eastern Studies (London: F. Cass.) 39 (4): 67–80. doi:10.1080/00263200412331301787. ISSN 0026-3206.
* Omur, Asl? (December 2002). "Modernity and Islam: Experiences of Turkish Women". Turkish Times 13 (312). ISSN 1043-0164. http://www.theturkishtimes.com/archive/02/12_01/c_women.html. Retrieved 2007-10-10.
* Özelli, M. Tunç (January 1974). "The Evolution of the Formal Educational System and its Relation to Economic Growth Policies in the First Turkish Republic". International Journal of Middle East Studies (London: Cambridge University Press) 5 (1): 77–92. ISSN 0020-7438. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0020-7438%28197401%295%3A1%3C77%3ATEOTFE%3E2.0.CO%3B2-G.
* Stone, Norman (2000). "Talking Turkey". The National Interest (New York: National Affairs, Inc) 61: 66. ISSN 0884-9382.
* Volkan, Vamik D. (1981). "Immortal Atatürk — Narcissism and Creativity in a Revolutionary Leader". Psychoanalytic Study of Society (New York: Psychohistory Press) 9: 221–255. ISSN 0079-7294. OCLC 60448681.
* Wolf-Gazo, Ernest (1996). "John Dewey in Turkey: An Educational Mission". Journal of American Studies of Turkey (Ankara, Turkey: American Studies Association of Turkey) 3: 15–42. ISSN 1300-6606. http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/~jast/Number3/Gazo.html. [dead link]
* "Mustafa Kemal Atatürk". TP Editors: pp. 7–8. http://www.teknikportal.com/mustafa-kemal-ataturk-hayati-basarilari-t9870.0.html. Retrieved 2008-04-29.
* "The Burial of Atatürk". Time Magazine: pp. 37–39. 23 November 1953. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,860125,00.html. Retrieved 2007-08-07.

External links
Find more about Mustafa Kemal Atatürk on Wikipedia's sister projects:
Definitions from Wiktionary
Images and media from Commons
Learning resources from Wikiversity
News stories from Wikinews
Quotations from Wikiquote
Source texts from Wikisource
Textbooks from Wikibooks

* Memorial room in Bitola (Monastir)

Military offices
Preceded by
Ahmet ?zzet Furgaç Commander of the Second Army
March – July 1917 Succeeded by
Fevzi Çakmak
Preceded by
Unknown Commander of the Seventh Army
July – October 1917 Succeeded by
Fevzi Çakmak
Preceded by
Fevzi Çakmak Commander of the Seventh Army
August – September 1918 Formation destroyed
Preceded by
Otto Liman von Sanders Commander of Thunder Army Group
Residual elements
October – November 1918 Formation dissolved
Political offices
New title
State founded
Prime Minister of Turkey
25 April 1920–24 January 1921 Succeeded by
Fevzi Çakmak
Preceded by
founded Speaker of the Parliament of Turkey
24 April 1920–29 October 1923 Succeeded by
Ali Fethi Okyar
Preceded by
founded President of Turkey
29 October 1923–10 November 1938 Succeeded by
?smet ?nönü
Party political offices
Preceded by
founded Leader of the Republican People's Party
9 September 1923–10 November 1938 Succeeded by
?smet ?nönü
[show]v · d · ePresidents of the Republic of Turkey (List)
Presidential Seal of the Republic of Turkey.svg

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk · ?smet ?nönü · Celâl Bayar · Cemal Gürsel · Cevdet Sunay · Fahri Korutürk · Kenan Evren · Turgut Özal · Süleyman Demirel · Ahmet Necdet Sezer · Abdullah Gül
Standard of the President of Turkey
[show]v · d · ePrime Ministers of the Republic of Turkey (List)
War of Independence
(1920–1923)
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk · Fevzi Çakmak · Rauf Orbay · Ali Fethi Okyar
Republic of Turkey
(since 1923)
?smet ?nönü · Ali Fethi Okyar · ?smet ?nönü · Celal Bayar · Refik Saydam · ?ükrü Saraco?lu · Recep Peker · Hasan Saka · ?emsettin Günaltay · Adnan Menderes · Cemal Gürsel · ?smet ?nönü · Suat Hayri Ürgüplü · Süleyman Demirel · Nihat Erim · Ferit Melen · Naim Talu · Bülent Ecevit · Sadi Irmak · Süleyman Demirel · Bülent Ecevit · Süleyman Demirel · Bülent Ecevit · Süleyman Demirel · Bülent Ulusu · Turgut Özal · Y?ld?r?m Akbulut · Mesut Y?lmaz · Süleyman Demirel · Tansu Çiller · Mesut Y?lmaz · Necmettin Erbakan · Mesut Y?lmaz · Bülent Ecevit · Abdullah Gül · Recep Tayyip Erdo?an
Republic of Turkey
(since 1923, acting)
Ahmet Fikri Tüzer · Emin Fahrettin Özdilek · Ali Bozer · Erdal ?nönü
[show]v · d · eSpeakers of the Parliament of the Republic of Turkey
Grand National Assembly
(1920–1960)
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk · Ali Fethi Okyar · Kâz?m Özalp · Abdülhalik Renda · Kâz?m Karabekir · Ali Fuat Cebesoy · ?ükrü Saraco?lu · Refik Koraltan
House of Representatives
(1961)
Kâz?m Orbay
National Assembly
(1961–1980)
Fuat Sirmen · Ferruh Bozbeyli · Sabit Osman Avc? · Kemal Güven · Cahit Karaka?
Consultative Assembly
(1981–1983)
Sadi Irmak
Grand National Assembly
(since 1983)
Necmettin Karaduman · Y?ld?r?m Akbulut · ?smet Kaya Erdem · Hüsamettin Cindoruk · ?smet Sezgin · Mustafa Kalemli · Hikmet Çetin · Ömer ?zgi · Bülent Ar?nç · Köksal Toptan · Mehmet Ali ?ahin
[show]v · d · eLeaders of the Republican People's Party
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk · ?smet ?nönü · Bülent Ecevit · Deniz Baykal · Hikmet Çetin · Deniz Baykal · Altan Öymen · Deniz Baykal · Kemal K?l?çdaro?lu
[show]v · d · eTurkey Turkey topics
People and
biographies
Turkish people · Atatürk
Coat of arms of Turkey
History
(timeline)
Early

Sultanate of Rûm · Anatolian Turkish Beyliks
Ottoman

Rise · Growth · Stagnation · Decline · Dissolution
Republic

War of Independence · Single-party period · Multi-party period
By topic

Constitutional · Economic · Military
Politics and
government
President · Prime Minister · Parliament · Council of Ministers · Political parties · Elections · EU accession · Foreign relations · Military · Human rights · LGBT rights · Secularism · Ottomanism · Kemalism · Neo-Ottomanism · Deep state
Legal system
Constitution · Constitutional Court · Official Gazette · Crime · Law enforcement
Geography
Anatolia · Thrace · Regions · Provinces · Districts · Cities · Metropolitan centers · Environmental issues · Mountains · Islands · Rivers · Lakes · Peninsulas · Capes · Bays · Turkish Riviera
Economy and
transport
Industries · Companies · Stock Exchange · Central Bank · Other banks · EU Customs Union · Southeastern Anatolia Project · Tourism · Currency · Railways · Aviation
Demographics and Religion
Turkish language · Languages of Turkey · Education · Religion · Islam · Turkish population · Turkish diaspora · Immigration
Culture and
media
Ottoman architecture · Art · Cinema · Cuisine · Dance · Festivals · Folklore · Public holidays · Literature · Music · Smoking · Sport · Theatre · Wine · Newspapers · Radio stations · Television
Symbols
Emblem · Flag · Presidential Seal · National anthem
Portal

Persondata
Name Atatürk, Mustafa Kemal
Alternative names Pasha, Gazi Mustafa Kemal (former name)
Short description Turkish officer and statesman
Date of birth 1881
Place of birth Selânik (Thessaloniki)
Date of death 10 November 1938
Place of death Dolmabahçe Palace, Istanbul

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mustafa_Kemal_Atat%C3%BCrk"
Categories: 1881 births | 1938 deaths | People from Thessaloniki | Deaths from cirrhosis | Field Marshals of Turkey | Leaders of the Republican People's Party (Turkey) | Leaders who took power by coup | Mustafa Kemal Atatürk | Ottoman Empire in World War I | Ottoman military personnel of the Balkan Wars | Ottoman military personnel of World War I | Turkish War of Independence | Ottoman Thessalonica | Pashas | People illustrated on Turkish banknotes | Presidents of Turkey | Prime Ministers of Turkey | Revolutionaries | Secularism | Secularism in Turkey | Republicanism in Turkey | Speakers of the Parliament of Turkey | Recipients of the Order of the Medjidieh | Recipients of the Order of Osminieh | Légion d'honneur recipients | Recipients of the Order of St Alexander | Recipients of the Imtiyaz Medal | Recipients of the Liakat Medal | Recipients of the Iron Cross | Recipients of the Military Merit Medal (Austria-Hungary) | Recipients of the Military Merit Cross (Austria-Hungary) | Recipients of the Order of the Crown (Prussia) | Recipients of the Medal of Independence with Red-Green Ribbon (Turkey) | Committee of Union and Progress politicians | Deists
Hidden categories: All pages needing cleanup | Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from September 2010 | All articles with dead external links | Articles with dead external links from October 2010 | Articles with dead external links from September 2010 | Wikipedia semi-protected pages | NPOV disputes from February 2011 | All NPOV disputes | All articles with unsourced statements | Articles with unsourced statements from December 2008 | Articles containing Turkish language text | Wikipedia articles needing clarification from December 2008 | Articles with dead external links from June 2010 | Articles containing video clips
Personal tools

* Log in / create account

Namespaces

* Article
* Discussion

Variants

Views

* Read
* View source
* View history

Actions

Search
Search
Navigation

* Main page
* Contents
* Featured content
* Current events
* Random article
* Donate to Wikipedia

Interaction

* Help
* About Wikipedia
* Community portal
* Recent changes
* Contact Wikipedia

Toolbox

* What links here
* Related changes
* Upload file
* Special pages
* Permanent link
* Cite this page

Print/export

* Create a book
* Download as PDF
* Printable version

Languages

* Afrikaans
* ???????
* Aragonés
* Az?rbaycanca
* ?????
* Bahasa Banjar
* Bân-lâm-gú
* ?????????
* ??????????
* ??????????? (???????????)?
* Bosanski
* Brezhoneg
* ?????????
* Català
* Cebuano
* ?esky
* Cymraeg
* Dansk
* Deutsch
* Eesti
* ????????
* Español
* Esperanto
* Euskara
* ?????
* Fiji Hindi
* Français
* Frysk
* Gaeilge
* Galego
* ??
* ???
* ???????
* ??????
* Hrvatski
* Ido
* Bahasa Indonesia
* ??????
* isiXhosa
* Íslenska
* Italiano
* ?????
* Basa Jawa
* ?????
* ???????????? / Qabardjaj?bza
* ????????-???????
* ???????
* ???????
* Kinyarwanda
* ????????
* Kiswahili
* Kurdî
* ????? ????
* Latina
* Latviešu
* Lëtzebuergesch
* Lietuvi?
* Lumbaart
* Magyar
* ??????????
* ??????
* ?????
* ????
* Bahasa Melayu
* ??????
* ??????????
* Nederlands
* ???
* ?Norsk (bokmål)?
* ?Norsk (nynorsk)?
* Occitan
* O'zbek
* ??????
* Polski
* Português
* Q?r?mtatarca
* Român?
* Runa Simi
* ??????????
* ???????
* ???? ????
* Sardu
* Scots
* Shqip
* Simple English
* Sloven?ina
* Slovenš?ina
* Soomaaliga
* ?????
* ?????? / Srpski
* Srpskohrvatski / ??????????????
* Suomi
* Svenska
* Tagalog
* ?????
* ???????/Tatarça
* ??????
* ???
* Türkçe
* Türkmençe
* ??????
* ??????????
* ????
* ???????? / Uyghurche?
* Ti?ng Vi?t
* Winaray
* ??????
* Yorùbá
* Zazaki
* Žemait?ška
* ??

* This page was last modified on 30 March 2011 at 21:14.
* Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details.
Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
* Contact us

* Privacy policy
* About Wikipedia
* Disclaimers

* Wikimedia Foundation
* Powered by MediaWiki

 

BEKAT

8:56 AM ET

March 31, 2011

The wrong list!!

I don't care what the mean of dictator is. (I think that Ataturk is not dictator as well that cannot be argued). But if there is a list which contains Hitler and Franco under the same title, it is really big wrong.

 

GEORG GEORGIAN

2:11 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Liar

Ataturk is the biggest killer of all time. He is number one. Whether he has a mustache or not, does not matter.
Hitler killed millions of Jews and Ataturk killed also millions of Kurds and Armenians.
Ataturk=Hitler

 

ATA

2:22 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Whore

What the F are you saying? Ataturk was a great leader and not a killer, if you want to talk about killers than lets talk about Bush!

 

ALPERDEM

10:39 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Subnormal

:D . What a subnormal person you are.

 

ALPERDEM

10:44 AM ET

April 1, 2011

TO GEORG GEORGIAN

:D. what a subnormal person you are.

 

BARBAROS52

9:20 AM ET

March 31, 2011

Stiff Upper Lip

Charles Homans,

I don't know how you obtain this human name, without the qualifying intelligence level to be one you poor thing.
One do not need to defame somebody else to be noticed; if you can't do it by your own merit, you are a bastard and don't bother.
My real wory is how this magazine come down to your level and took you serious enough, to give this opportunity of self advertising.
If you are really looking for a person lower than yourself by defaming it in order to elevate yourself, look no further than yourself; you are the perfect example of even lower than the lowest.
One deffinately would be ashamed to cary the identy you have.

Barbaros Oner

 

VOLKAN T

9:35 AM ET

March 31, 2011

ATATURK IS NOT A DICTATOR..!

BUT WHO WRITE THIS NEWS ,HE MUST BE INGNORANT..! WHAT A JOURNALIST WHAT A POLITICAL MAGAZINE..?NO RESEARCH,NO KNOWLEDGE..WELL DONE..!!

 

GEORG GEORGIAN

1:56 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Ataturk is the big Dictator

Ataturk is the biggest killer of all time. He is number one. Whether he has a mustache or not does not matter.

 

ALPERDEM

10:45 AM ET

April 1, 2011

TO GEORG GEORGIAN

:D. what a subnormal person you are.

 

RASIT

9:51 AM ET

March 31, 2011

Knowledge is Power..

"I am honoured to join in commemorating the 25th anniversary of the death
of Kemal Ataturk. The name of Ataturk brings to mind the historic
accomplishments of one of the great man of this century, his inspired
leadership of the Turkish People, his perceptive understanding of the
modern world and his boldness as a military leader."
I salute this great man on the anniversary of his death

John F. Kennedy, U.S. President
Washington D.C., November 10, 1963

___________________

" I learned about Mustafa Kemal Atatürk from someone who knows him very well. As I was speaking to the Foreign Affairs Minister of the Soviet Union, Litvinov, he told me that the most valuable and interesting leader in the world does not live in Europe but beyond the Straits in Ankara and that he was the President of the Turkish Republic, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. "

Franklin D. Roosevelt
___________________

" The death of Atatürk, who had saved Turkey during the war and revived the Turkish Nation after the war, is a great loss, not only for his country, but also for Europe as well. "

Sir Winston Churchill

___________________

" Atatürk was a statesman a military leader and one of the greatest leaders of our century. I am proud to be one o Atatürk's loyal friends. "

Gen. Douglas MacArtur

___

Knowledge is power, however Charles HOMANS, you should probably stick to publishing story's for comic books.. Bye Bye..

Ne Mutlu TURKUM diyene.
Rasit VAN.

 

GEORG GEORGIAN

4:23 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Evidence

Please click on
http://rasterast.com/?p=1275

 

ALPERDEM

10:46 AM ET

April 1, 2011

TO GEORG GEORGIAN

:D. what a subnormal person you are.

 

ULYTA

9:57 AM ET

March 31, 2011

Ali from Turkish Republic

Lol,when you people calling Ataturk dictator so sorry where is the so called Kinds,Amirs of Arabian Peninsula?

Of course they share their oil with you so no problem oh about Saddam please check honorary citizens of United States

To writer here is JFK speech about Gazi Mustafa Kemal Atatürk;

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RfCGap0Pic

 

OZLEM

10:01 AM ET

March 31, 2011

NE MUTLU TÜRK'ÜM D?YENE YANKILANSIN BURADANN...

How proud of one who says I'm TURKISH..Atatürk was(is) the greatest leader that the world has seen..go on saying nonsentialness..

 

GEORG GEORGIAN

1:58 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Ataturk was a big Dictator, not Lider!

Ataturk is the biggest killer of all time. He is number one. Whether he has a mustache or not, does not matter.

 

ALPERDEM

10:47 AM ET

April 1, 2011

TO GEORG GEORGIAN

:D. what a subnormal person you are.

 

IGNORANT CHARLES

10:30 AM ET

March 31, 2011

Ataturk the greatest leader!!

Now I see That your journalists dont make any reasearch before they write or classify people. Ataturk is one of the greatest leaders in the world. All he did was he saved his country and put democracy on table. How can you show him in the dictator list? Charles Homans now you became the worst columnist not only in Turkish people eyes but also in the whole world. I can honestly tell you that you ruined your career in the beginning of your miserable life… WELL DONE SUCKER

 

GEORG GEORGIAN

1:58 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Ataturk is the big Dictator

Ataturk is the biggest killer of all time. He is number one. Whether he has a mustache or not, does not matter.

 

MEHTAP

10:33 AM ET

March 31, 2011

Atatürk ignorant who do not know the life of

Abd to bring democracy to Afghanistan and Iraq killing thousands of people saying, Ataturk for defending their own country dictator, was declared.
pity you,See for yourself before criticizing.Read the lives of atatürk

 

ATATURKIYE

10:39 AM ET

March 31, 2011

West in War with Turkey! We will show who is dick!

Everybody in the whole world knows Bush snatched the elections with his brother's help in Florida.

This is propaganda for the Greater Middle East Initiative. That is why in Turkey, General's closer to Russia and the east is being jailed with the ergenekon courts.

Book that are not published are being taken with police court order.
www.imaminordusu.com

West's puppet fgulen is taking over justice, police system in Turkey with the help of the West.

AKP and RTE are becoming the DICTATOR of Turkey with their allies West in exchange for land.

Turkey is becoming a slave for the west.

I doubt that this will be posted here but here Ataturk's last letter to Turkish Youth.

I myself will follow this to death!

Turkish Youth! Your first duty is to preserve and to defend Turkish
Independence and the Turkish Republic forever.

This is the very foundation of your existence and your future. This foundation is your most
precious treasure. In the future, too, there may be malevolent people at
home and abroad, who will wish to deprive you of this treasure. If some
day you are compelled to defend your independence and your Republic, you
must not hesitate to weigh the possibilities and circumstances of the
situation before doing your duty. These possibilities and circumstances
may turn out to be extremely unfavourable. The enemies c onspiring against
your independence and your Republic may have behind them a victory
unprecedented in the annals of the world. It may be that, by violence and
trickery, all the fortresses of your beloved fatherland may be captured,
all its shipyards occupied, all its armies dispersed and every corner of
the country invaded. And sadder and graver than all these circumstances,
thos e who hold power within the country may be in error, misguided and
may even be traitors. Furthermore, they may identify personal interests
with the political designs of the invaders. The country may be
impoverished, ruined and exhausted.

Youth of Turkey's future! even insuch circumstances it is your duty; to save Turkish Independence and the
Republic! You will find the strength, you need in your noble blood!

 

GEORG GEORGIAN

2:00 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Ataturk is the big Dictator

Ataturk is the biggest killer of all time. He is number one. Whether he has a mustache or not, does not matter.

 

EYARTASI

10:41 AM ET

March 31, 2011

Just Calm Down

Mr. Homans,
You don't really care about your career and don't really pay attention to what you write do you?
No, that's right, you don't say these guys on this article were dictators but you classify Atatürk as one, as all the other guys on this article ARE dictators.
I now invite you two correct your mistake, apologise to the Turkish people and remove this article at once.
You Agricola,
The Armenians and the Kurds claim that the Turks murdered them, raped them and so on, just because they didn’t get what they wanted during the war. They were the ones who stabbed Turks from behind and tried to get soils of the Turkish Republic to establish their own state. That didn’t happen and never will... I just wonder what you would do if the red skins tried to kick you out off their OWN land! Just think about it. The Anatolia has been a Turkish land since 1071 and will always be... regardless of what Armenians and Kurds do / think!!!
You can just keep feeling sorry about them as much as you like, if you want to waste your time!!!
And I just recommend you read some TRUE history! You may find some info on what actually happened.

 

COMMANDER1919

12:37 PM ET

March 31, 2011

good one

thank you, invitation for fp magazine to write about today's reality and real history, if they can!!!

 

AGRICOLA

3:56 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Agree, u need a breather.

" tried to get soils of the Turkish Republic to establish their own state"

a turksih state that conquered and occupied armenian lands in the first place.

"I just wonder what you would do if the red skins tried to kick you out off their OWN land!"

I'm from Iceland... original inhabitant. But since I work in the states, here is what i know about native american, or "red skins" as u rudely refer to them as. They get free health care, no taxes, subsidies, free education, monetary compensation, and public apologies from American presidents about the injustice done to them. Americans are taught that the treatment was the indians was wrong. Turks raped Armenian, then blame the victim.

"Just think about it. The Anatolia has been a Turkish land since 1071"

Yet a turkish version of zionism pushed the turks further west into Constantinople... a city still under occupation.

Thank you boy, for reaffirming to all Europeans here, why turkey does not belong in the EU, and how it really is, just another hot headed muslim country.

And I just recommend you read some TRUE history!

 

MEHTAP

10:42 AM ET

March 31, 2011

a great leader

a great leader Atatürk
nonsense written here

 

GEORG GEORGIAN

2:00 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Ataturk is the big Dictator

Ataturk is the biggest killer of all time. He is number one. Whether he has a mustache or not, does not matter.

 

ATATURK WILL NEVER DIE

11:11 AM ET

March 31, 2011

Ataturk was a leader you wish to have, You dick!

Ataturk was brave, honest leader who work for the independence of his land and it's people unlike your lying, exploiting, colonizing crook to the limit leaders...you won't be forgiven for this article dick head, we love and respect our savior founder of our country; Kemal Ataturk

 

UGUR TURGUT

11:43 AM ET

March 31, 2011

Atatürk not Dictator

"Ataturk took office as the autocratic ruler of the new Republic of Turkey"
This is bullshit!Are you sure about know something about Atatürk?Do you know?
-He is the founder of Republic of Turkiye (He can made Kingdom of Turkiye,or New Ottoman)
-He is the founder of Turkish National Parliament
-He gave right of electing to all citizens (include womans!)
-He left goverment before he died and give power Turkish citizens!
So becareful talking about Atatürk...

 

GEORG GEORGIAN

2:03 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Ataturk=Adolf HItler

Ataturk is the biggest killer of all time. He is number one. Whether he has a mustache or not does not matter.
Hitler killed millions of Jews and Ataturk killed also millions of Kurds and Armenians.

 

XENOPHON

11:45 AM ET

March 31, 2011

I didn't realize FP was starting a cartoon section

Well, I'll leave the Attaturk "debate" alone and ask this:

Homans, did you really spend company time coming up with this nonsense?

Let's look at this group of dictators:

Qadaffi, Mubarak, Mao, Syngman Rhee, Pol Pot, Mussolini, Francois Duvalier, Battista, Antonescu, Salazar, the Kims of North Korea

Now, let's look at this group of non-dictator political leaders:

Teddy Roosevelt, Charles DeGaulle, Anthony Eden, Harold MacMillan, Vittorio Orlando, Chester Arthur, Grover Cleveland

Get the point?

I'm sure with all that''s going on in the world, a writer for FP MUST be able to keep himself occupied with some more worthwhile effort. Thanks in advance.

 

OHABEY

2:24 PM ET

March 31, 2011

there are many more

Hemingway, Steinbeck, Dali, etc.

I am sending an invoice to FP.

 

BILKANK

11:49 AM ET

March 31, 2011

The Armenian Genocide

First of all, The Republic of Turkey has nothing to do with with the so-called Armenian Genocide because it is claimed that this event happened before the Indepence War Effort that Ataturk started AGAINST the Ottoman Empire and the Western Imperial Forces. The so-called Armenian Genocide is claimed to have been done by the Ottoman forces and the local Kurdish tribes but even if that were true, it has nothing to do with Ataturk and the founders of Turkey. He was just an officer at the time and never was stationed in an area that the Armenians lived or migrated to. He in fact ended the regime that is held responsible for that event and for that reason he has to be favored instead of despised by the Armenians but they look for someone to blame and to hate because their Great Armenia dream was destroyed and their ambitions of granduer was not fullfilled and they are now a tiny country with nearly no economy. Their country is a parasite that cannot survive on its own and count on the money sent by the diaspora. And despite their unlawful conquest of Karaba? region in Azerbaijan, Turkey never even thought about a going into war with Armenian and for that they should be grateful. They have no right to ask for confirmation and compansation for the Armenian Genocide because that even is not a genocidical event, it is retaliation. It was the common people that attacked the Armenians that are migrating not the army. Of course there were some soldiers in them and for that over a thousand was executed. Why would the Ottomans execute more than thousand of its troops if they wanted to murder the Armenians anyway? This alone proves that the death of the Armenians during the migration was unintentional. During WWI the Armenians took up arms and attacked Ottoman Armies behind the lines, they massacared civilians. According to War time regulations, the penalty for treason is death but still the authorities preffered to send them to places where they could do less harm instead of ending this revolt by destroying what little population the Armenians had. The existance of Armenia today is proof enough to say that the murder of Armenians during war time, because of their treacherous behaviour , is not approved by the Ottoman state and were done by the local population as retaliation for the millions of Turkish lives that was lost during the revolt.

 

BILKANK

12:23 PM ET

March 31, 2011

By the way, I am not trying

By the way, I am not trying to justify the killings by saying its retaliation. What I ment to say is that the population was furious against the Armenians because of their betrayal and the attacks on the migrating convoys were not unprovoked. People that are unfamiliar to this topic think that this event is just like what Hitler did to Jewish people,a systematical wipe-out operation against a nation that commited no military attrocities against others. In the case of Armenians, it was a full scale revolt and The Ottoman Empire was struggling to hold against within and without. It was a temporary precaution to move them to cities where they could cause less trouble but this led to disaster and the military failed to protect the migrating population completely. As a mentioned earlier, over a thousand troops were executed because of their inability to provide their security.

 

GEORG GEORGIAN

2:09 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Liar

Ataturk is the biggest killer of all time. He is number one. Whether he has a mustache or not, does not matter.
Hitler killed millions of Jews and Ataturk killed also millions of Kurds and Armenians.
Ataturk=Hitler

 

GEORG GEORGIAN

2:10 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Liar

Ataturk is the biggest killer of all time. He is number one. Whether he has a mustache or not, does not matter.
Hitler killed millions of Jews and Ataturk killed also millions of Kurds and Armenians.
Ataturk=Hitler

 

BILKANK

11:50 AM ET

March 31, 2011

ya bide ingilizce bilmiosan?z

ya bide ingilizce bilmiosan?z ?uraya yaz? yazmay?n allaha?k?na

 

IGNORANT CHARLES

12:07 PM ET

March 31, 2011

senin gibi bos bos

senin gibi bos bos yazmaktansa en azindan insanlar bi amac ugruna yaziyorlar .. iyi yada kotu..sende cabala seninkinide alkislayalim

 

BILKANK

12:29 PM ET

March 31, 2011

adamlar google translatordan

adamlar google translatordan cevap yaziyorlar burda ben bile anlamadim ne yazdigini ingilizce dersi vermek icin soylemiyorum bunu bi konuyu iyi savunamayacaksan savunma daha iyi hicbir anlami yok

 

BILKANK

12:33 PM ET

March 31, 2011

burda oyle atip tutmakla

burda oyle atip tutmakla adamlara kufur edip biz boyle aslaniz adamin anasini sikeriz demekle bisey elde edemezsiniz en cok kufur eden en ataturkcu diye bisey yok duzgun bi savunma yapabilicekseniz yap?n demek istedim

 

GEORG GEORGIAN

2:07 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Ataturk=Adolf HItler

Ataturk is the biggest killer of all time. He is number one. Whether he has a mustache or not, does not matter.
Hitler killed millions of Jews and Ataturk killed also millions of Kurds and Armenians.

 

EMREY?LMAZ

12:02 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Atatürk wasn't a dictetor you ignorant dicks!

What s this bullshit?! Ha ? You must respect our legend history! Gazi Mustafa Kemal ATATÜRK is our father! The posion words of armenian liers and this kinda things are bullshit!! Anan?z? sikeriz ipneler sizi!!

NE MUTLU "TÜRK"ÜM D?YENE!!

 

GEORG GEORGIAN

2:05 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Ne mutlu insan olana, Türkler insan olmayi zor basarir, kansizla

Ataturk is the biggest killer of all time. He is number one. Whether he has a mustache or not does not matter.
Hitler killed millions of Jews and Ataturk killed also millions of Kurds and Armenians.

 

COMMANDER1919

12:09 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Know history first before you publish

shame on you fp magazine , Ataturk was not a dictator.you need to correct the article and apologize immediately.Actually you anglo-saksons, you need to learn alot from Ataturk.why dont you write about todays dictators in the world?also you dont need to do a research to find out real dictators of today, because they are not far away from you.know history first, if you dont know I will teach you untill you learn.

 

COMMANDER1919

12:19 PM ET

March 31, 2011

I believe you know Ataturk by heart

I believe you know who is he, why dont you publish reality instead of insulting great leader of the century.Convinced that personalities who worked for understanding and cooperation between nations and international peace will be examples for future generations, Recalling that the hundredth anniversary of the birth of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, founder of the Turkish Republic, will be celebrated in 1981, Knowing that he was an exceptional reformer in all fields relevant to the competence of UNESCO, Recognizing in particular that he was the leader of the first struggle given against colonialism and imperialism, Recalling that he was the remarkable promoter of the sense of understanding between peoples and durable peace between the nations of the world and that he worked all his life for the development of harmony and cooperation between peoples without distinction of color, religion and race, It is decided that UNESCO should collaborate in 1981 with the Turkish Government on both intellectual and technical plans for an international colloquium with the aim of acquainting the world with the various aspects of the personality and deeds of Atatürk whose objective was to promote world peace, international understanding and respect for human rights.

 

COMMANDER1919

12:33 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Unesco : leader of the century

check this out
http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0007/000747/074752eo.pdf

 

BILKANK

12:37 PM ET

March 31, 2011

"The Kaiser"

"The Kaiser" mustache was not a symbol as in the case of hitler's or stalin's mustache , it was fashionable at the time and at that time Ataturk was just an officer of The Ottoman Army, not its leader

 

HAYO10

12:41 PM ET

March 31, 2011

You pissed of Turks big time!

Dictators like Hitler, Mussolini, Franco and Saddam usually lead their nations to bad fortunes. Unlike all these leaders, Ataturk is the soldier and statesman that fought for the independence of his country and brought western institutions after the demise of the monarchic, semi-theocratic Ottoman Empire.
He lead the reforms that liberated the women from sharia law, laid down the foundations of the secular Turkish state alongside many other reforms. Thanks to him, Turkey is no Egypt or Iraq today, or never was a colony of Britain or France. If you're not Turkish, it's not easy to understand what this means. Finally, unlike other leaders in this piece, he didn't lead his country to war, not even once, after the borders of the new state was established.
He may have done wrong, of course, as any other leader would do, but his rights,imo, are way ahead of his wrongs. You can call him autocratic,judging him retrospectively with today's standards, but it's really really unfair to call him a dictator.

 

CASE2501

1:00 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Ataturk a dictator? Please read some history

If you write an article about someone or something you have at least some knowledge about the subject.

Claiming Ataturk was a dictator is something I wouldn't even call ignorance, it is a spit in the face of history as a science. If this shameful act is not done deliberately I really feel pitty for the writer, who obviously lacks very basic historical knowledge. I urgently recommend the writer to read about the last days of the Ottoman Empire, about the Turkish War of Independence and about the early Turkish Republic with all the reforms done with the leadership of Ataturk. And I don't mean a quick skim through Wikipedia (he/she most probably hasn't even done that). I mean real history books with scientific references!

I thought FS was a serious magazine. It turns out to be that it is no different than one of the thousands of cheap blogs where everyone can write about their own fiction without having respect to the truth.

As a Turkish citizen, I demand an official apology from FS for this absurd and untruthful column, which is attacking the memory of our forefather. And I recommend to each of your writers to put a scientific references for each of their claims from now on. Please publish scientific works instead of gossip fiction.

 

OHABEY

2:05 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Dictatormania

As a Turk living in the US, I need to say that dictatormania is big here. A small portion of Americans are obsessed with labeling unlikely political figures as dictators. For example, there are still significant number of Americans who believe that Lincoln and/or Obama are dictators. Maybe I should say totalitarianmania instead of dictatormania since there are toher trendy labels. According to Ann Coulter, a right-wing pundit, all liberals are fascists. Another right-wing pundit Glenn Beck thinks Obama is a racist. So on and so on...you get the picture....

The only problem is that, like most of us/others, many Americans learn history from magazines, movies and films. As a Turk who admires Ataturk I know I will have hard time communicating with Americans who "learned" Ataturk from this slideshow...

Me: Hi there
You: Where are you from?
Me: Turkey
You: What do you think about Ataturk?
Me: I admire him
You: Why? He had a mustache!
Me: Not a big fan of big mustaches but, thanks to him, we have a functioning secular democracy in a very volatile part of the world. Thanks to his reforms, Turkish women got voting right long before Swiss and French women did.
You: So you have no respect for human rights
Me: I am sorry?
You: You admire Ataturk, you know
Me: In fact I am so pro human rights that Bill O'Reilly would think I am too soft to be a politician.... Hold on... where did you get this idea?
You: I once saw a slideshow featuring Ataturk and his mustache
Me: Well that's at least a start... nice meeting you.

 

GEORG GEORGIAN

2:06 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Ataturk is the big Dictator

Ataturk is the biggest killer of all time. He is number one. Whether he has a mustache or not, does not matter.
Hitler killed millions of Jews and Ataturk killed also millions of Kurds and Armenians. Hitler=Ataturk

 

ARMENIANFUCKER

2:20 PM ET

March 31, 2011

we still try it all of GIAN end surname bitches..

Still milions armenian live in Turkey, only you are clever from them ?

 

MELIS CIN

2:23 PM ET

March 31, 2011

You Have No Idea About Him

It is very obvious that you do not know anything about Turkey and ATATURK.

First, Ataturk did not kill any Armenian or Kurdish people.

He is such a leader who says " They will be will be our children since they died in these territories."after Gallipoli war for the Anzac soldiers.

DO NOT even say a word about him if you do not know he is a pacifist and a great leader!

 

PEER SYLVERSTATT

4:31 PM ET

March 31, 2011

You must really hate the turks. Very fascinating!

It seems you are a funny guy.
But repeating nonsense, makes it not better.
Obviously you are in deep mental trouble.

Maybe you try to find a good doctor, to help your stutter problem.

Wish you good health!

 

COMMANDER1919

5:34 PM ET

March 31, 2011

:)))thats the game.non-turks

:)))thats the game.non-turks provocate turks and turks start to kill, then turks become killer.
come honey I am waiting , big ararat is ready for you and its getting bigger and bigger.

 

GARY1

6:03 PM ET

March 31, 2011

APOLOGISE

WRITER JUST APOLOGISE. YOU CAN NOT COMPARE HITLER TO ATATURK. SHAME ON YOU IF YOU DONT. ATATURK IS GREATEST LEADER ALL EARTH. EVEN ASK CHURCHILL SAID: I ADMIRE ATATURK. AXPECTING APOLOGIE PLEASE AND REMOVE THIS PICTURE NOW

 

GARY1

6:04 PM ET

March 31, 2011

GEORGE BUSH

WHY DONT YOU PUT GEORGE W BUSH AND OBAMA RIGHT NOW

 

EMREY?LMAZ

2:13 PM ET

March 31, 2011

georg georgian look

If you ll a threat to our county we can fuck your fucking brain not just kurds or armenians or all of others! shut the fuck up you bastard! If you want to see come to istanbul and i swear i ll fuck your soul ;)

 

ATA

2:20 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Ignorant!

How can you think that such a great leader could be a dictator? He was not a dictator, he was the savior of the Turks and the greatest leader of the last century! Fp you really messed up with this, i really want to know how you can repair the damage on your reputation now!

And please find out the right info before you right articles!

 

MELIS CIN

2:34 PM ET

March 31, 2011

HE IS THE GREATEST LEADER THE WORLD HAS EVER SEEN!

Mr Homans,

Are aware of the fact that Mustafa Kemal ATATURK is the father of Turkish people?

Are you aware of the fact that he is the greatest leader in the WORLD?

Are you aware of the fact that he is a great leader and first teacher but NOT A DICTATOR?

Are you aware of the fact that he sacrificed himself for his country?

Are you aware of the fact that he established the republic when Turkey was in captivity?

Are you aware of the fact that he saved Turkey?

In case, you are not aware of all these, better you learn!
What kind of mentality can write something irrational about the greatest leader of the World?
I doubt about your journalism skills Mr Homans.

 

MELIS CIN

2:36 PM ET

March 31, 2011

APOLOGY

TURKS DESERVE AN APOLOGY FROM THE WRITER!

 

AGRICOLA

4:05 PM ET

March 31, 2011

turks deserve to give back stole land first

welcome to free speech. this isnt turkey where u just kill someone who is critical of ataturk. grow up and take the criticism.

 

COMMANDER1919

5:41 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Agricola

you cant critisize on facts.we are open for all comments but not for reality.nobody can change the history, also if you have any doubts we are ready to talk.

 

EMREY?LMAZ

2:45 PM ET

March 31, 2011

yok ya bu böyle olmayacak!

Bunlar?nda anas?n? sikmek farz olcak.

Le? mi kesildin Türk! Uyan art?k!! UYAN!!!

Oylar HEPAR'a Osman PAmuko?lu'na. Anadolu Kartal?na!!

Ya?as?n Vatan Ya?as?n Türk Milleti!!

 

MERT

2:51 PM ET

March 31, 2011

US

SOYKIRIMCILARIN BABASI:George Washington .Yak?n zaman?n ise George Walker Bush.US tarihi k?z?lderili,ve siyahlar?n kanlar? ile yaz?ld?.

 

EMIP

2:56 PM ET

March 31, 2011

A Silly Article

A lightweight “fluff” piece unworthy of inclusion in FP. On par with character analysis through urinalysis.

 

TOMMYTHOMAS

3:39 PM ET

March 31, 2011

HEY CHARLES HOMANS DI*** HEAD

FIRST OF ALL,ATATURK WAS NOT A DICTATOR,no one can be like him who founds a country in poor conditions at the war time,so how can you put him on to the first place,even onto the list;second of all,how much do you know about the Turkish people ?Do you think that the Turkish people are islamic stupid arab people ? I don't think so,ok and I'm a Turkish-American and I live in Florida.I have many different friends who are Armenian,who are Greek as well as who are Serbian.And we don't have a single problem with them.Because we are friendly and we are respectful to each other and to our culture.YOU HAVE TO READ SOME BOOKS AND WATCH SOME VIDEOS ABOUT ATATURK AND PEOPLE WHO RESPECTED ATATURK AND THE TURKISH REPUBLIC AND LEARN ALL OF THIS STUFF BEFORE YOU TALK LIKE THAT.MAYBE SOME PEOPLE ARE PAYING YOU TO WRITE AND PUBLISH STUFF LIKE THIS BUT,LEARN SOME INFORMATION AND ARGUE.EVEN OUR GREEK AND ARMENIAN FRIENDS SAYS MR.ATATURK WAS A GREAT LEADER WHO RECREATED TURKISH REPUBLIC!!! <>

 

BRADWIL51

3:50 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Ignorant ''journalists''

those people naming themselves ''journalists'' are just paid ones, the worst of any kind of journalism!!! they cannot defame a nation and its leader with this b..th!!!

..therefore we should educate them so-called journalists, obviously they still need, lets start with :

http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0007/000747/074752eo.pdf

 

BRADWIL51

3:44 PM ET

March 31, 2011

You ignorant paid ''writers''

you paid writers are just the black side of journalism, how dare you could call the leader of a nation and the founder of a country ''Dictator'' or ''Autocratic'' , which is nearly 90 years old; what facts could you write to justify your ignorance?!

i hope some of you can read the article published by UNESCO about Mustafa Kemal ATATÜRK and then APOLOGIZE us Turks, here is the link:

http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0007/000747/074752eo.pdf

I AM WAITING FOR AN APOLOGY FROM YOU, i hope you can see your ignorance and mistake, if you dare to claim you are ''journalists'' !!!

A honourable TÜRK...like Mustafa Kemal ATATÜRK.

 

DRSKOKSAL

3:49 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Ataturk was not a dictator

Ataturk is a father of modern Turkey. Ataturk never resemble Hitler, Stalin and others. And Ataturk never, never resemble Recep Tayyip Erdogan...Ataturk is a great leader for all Turkey people...

 

SKYTEACHER

3:57 PM ET

March 31, 2011

who is dictator?

under this headline ATATURK is the last person that could be mentioned. He is the great leader of Turkey. This is a subjective article. I think you should be more careful. If the aim is to use this article for your circulation, it is really a bad idea.

 

BRADWIL51

3:58 PM ET

March 31, 2011

What ATATURK did...

Atatürk made many reforms in order to bring Turkey to the level of contemporary civilizations. Those reforms can be put under five main topics:

1. Political Reforms

- Abolishment of the Sultanate (1 November 1922)
- Declaration of the Republic (29 October 1923)
- Abolishment of Caliphate (3 March 1924)

2. Social Reforms

- Women were given equal rights with men (1926-1934) (Before many of Countries in Europe like France)
- The Revolution of Headgear and Outfit (25 November 1925)
- Closing of dervish lodges and shrines (30 November 1925)
- The surname law (21 June 1934)
- Abolishment of nicknames, pious and royal titles (26 November 1934)
- Adoption of the International calendar, time and measurements (1925-1931)

3. Juridical Reforms

- Abolishment of the Canon Law (1924-1937)
- Instating the new Turkish Civil Code and other legislation to suit secular order (1924 - 1937)

4. Educational and Cultural Reforms

- Integration of education (3 March 1924)
- Adoption of the new Turkish alphabet (1 November 1928)
- Establishment of the Turkish Language and Historical Societies (1931-1932)
- Organization of the university education (31 May 1933).
- Innovations in fine arts

5. Economical Reforms

- Abolishment of old taxation laws.
- Encouragement of the farmers.
- Establishment of model farms.
- Legislation of the Encouragement of the Industry Law and establishment of Industrial Corporations.
- Implementing First and Second Development Plans (1933-1937), construction of new highways to reach every corner of the country.

I AM WAITING FOR AN APOLOGY FROM YOU !!!

 

AGRICOLA

3:59 PM ET

March 31, 2011

turkish people go gobble gobble

This comment section is doing a wonderful job of showing how the turks are not ready for EU membership... and probably never will be.

The exreme defensiveness and denial exposed here shows how sensitive of a topic armenia and ataturk is to the guilty and shame turkish mind.

Thank u FP, for bringing the worms out of the woodwork!

 

BRADWIL51

4:09 PM ET

March 31, 2011

before saying anythiing, just know something ...

i hope you know how to read ..

http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0007/000747/074752eo.pdf

Atatürk made many reforms in order to bring Turkey to the level of contemporary civilizations. Those reforms can be put under five main topics:

1. Political Reforms

- Abolishment of the Sultanate (1 November 1922)
- Declaration of the Republic (29 October 1923)
- Abolishment of Caliphate (3 March 1924)

2. Social Reforms

- Women were given equal rights with men (1926-1934) (Before many of Countries in Europe like France)
- The Revolution of Headgear and Outfit (25 November 1925)
- Closing of dervish lodges and shrines (30 November 1925)
- The surname law (21 June 1934)
- Abolishment of nicknames, pious and royal titles (26 November 1934)
- Adoption of the International calendar, time and measurements (1925-1931)

3. Juridical Reforms

- Abolishment of the Canon Law (1924-1937)
- Instating the new Turkish Civil Code and other legislation to suit secular order (1924 - 1937)

4. Educational and Cultural Reforms

- Integration of education (3 March 1924)
- Adoption of the new Turkish alphabet (1 November 1928)
- Establishment of the Turkish Language and Historical Societies (1931-1932)
- Organization of the university education (31 May 1933).
- Innovations in fine arts

5. Economical Reforms

- Abolishment of old taxation laws.
- Encouragement of the farmers.
- Establishment of model farms.
- Legislation of the Encouragement of the Industry Law and establishment of Industrial Corporations.
- Implementing First and Second Development Plans (1933-1937), construction of new highways to reach every corner of the country.

 

ARMENIANFUCKER

4:34 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Sorry, who want to join EU ?

Its only government thinking. 70% population dont.

 

TURK

4:49 PM ET

March 31, 2011

who want it ?

Eu membership issue only politics , nobody take serious it in Turkey.

 

COMMANDER1919

5:57 PM ET

March 31, 2011

lol

turks taught eu not to shit behind the doors of the palaces.turks taught how to clean and wash your ass.who wants to be the member of eu.eu is about to die.are you brave enough to talk about reality?you CAN NOT change history.if you want to talk about reality, lets talk.we dont have anything to hide.one day eu will join us because they need turks.becareful, those worms came out from big racist snakes and those snakes will bite eachother one day.we never hide behind lies.by the way you were sensetive enough to write your comment here.why cant you talk openly?please be brave enough to stand behind your comments.and each time you attack, we will defence until you stop attacking.turks never be fire starters, you know that and its time to admit it.kindly admit REALITY please.

 

IGNORANT CHARLES

10:07 PM ET

March 31, 2011

calm down bro...

Hey realax bro... who told you that we want to be a part of EU. Thats just a bunch of country that are being dictated by france and germany. Another thing is that we are so open minded and we can accept any criticism for our country. But first i want to ask you would you accept if i tell lies about your father or mother. Now You might ask if ataturk is my father. I ll tell you what i love him more than i love my father and mother. Even we die for him... I feel sorry for you because probably you like your country just because you live on it. We love our country because it is worth to die on it. I don't expect you to understand our sensivity about him. I just want you to respect our only leader. After all, you think like an european and european citizents are known with thier tolerance and clemency.

 

BARABBAS

4:21 AM ET

April 1, 2011

History

You should do your own historical research instead of believing things which were told to you. Armenians were forced to relocate during WW1 to Syria, but why? Why those people who were named as "Millet-i Sad?ka" - which means "The Loyal Ones" by the way - was relocated? Have you ever read anything about destruction caused by Armenians? Did you ever bothered to search for how many Armenians were living in Anatolia that era? How you ever bothered to think before believing in something? Did you ever read British Diplomatic Messages for that era? No you did NOT! Because my friend you choose to believe and hate!

By the way if you and your kind is what is worthy to get in EU it would be better for us to keep out :)

 

PEER SYLVERSTATT

4:25 PM ET

March 31, 2011

@GEORG GEORGIAN

It seems you are a funny guy. But repeating nonsense, makes it not better. Obviously you are in deep mental trouble.
Maybe you try to find a good doctor, to help your stutter problem.

 

ARMENIANFUCKER

4:25 PM ET

March 31, 2011

Charles Homans Hobbits rat is erimanian

FP relaibility confirmed.

 

GARY1

6:25 PM ET

March 31, 2011

ATAM

PEACE AT HOME, PEACE IN THE WORLD"
DO NOT BE AFRAID TO TELLING THE TRUTH
HEY WRITER WHAT KIND OF DICTATOR ATATURK IS?
READ THIS COMMENTS FROM HIM AND TRY TO LEARN SOMETHING. OH BY THE WAY WHO WANTS TO JOIN EU. ANYONE PLEASE HANDS UP. 10% IN TURKIYE NOTHING ELSE.MY FRIEND TAKE EUROPE WITH YA.WE TURKS NEVER WANTED TO BE EUROPEAN.

EVERYONE WANTS TO BE ATATURK. TRUST YOUR WORDS IS NOTHING FOR US. REALITY IS THERE.

 

KARANLIK

7:05 PM ET

March 31, 2011

If Ataturk was a dictator, what about Einstein?

How come Einstein had a decision to sent a letter to Ataturk for asking a help to save his people from Hitler?. Is there anybody says Hitler was not a dictator? Is there anybody thinks that Einstein was a stupid and never know Ataturk was also a dictator?

Anyway....

Whatever you say and believe does not change the fact!

Just read the letter in the following pages. Don't say anything, it is what it was/is! You can not change the reality.

http://www.cankaya.edu.tr/duyuru/einstein_en.php

http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/8529/mektupn.gif

 

PEER SYLVERSTATT

7:07 PM ET

March 31, 2011

@GEORG GEORGIAN

In the meanwhile I researched the name "Georgian" in the Ankara public library. And look there what I found.

It appears that this name was used by a "Daschnakzutjun" officer.

What an interesting coincidence!
That makes clear that your mental illness is caused by hereditary mental illness.

Do you know what your ancestor did? I tell you for free!
He killed innocent kurdish woman and children in the region of Van.

He collected the parts of woman breasts as evidence, and sent it to a russian general in baskets.

What a glorious family history. Do you narrate this family history to your kids as a good night story.
Or do you exaggerate the real story to an epic saga.

I am very interested. How does it feel?

To live with a lie. With a big shadow of past.
And actually, is there something like god judgement in your life. Tell me the story, from your point of view.

 

KARANLIK

7:25 PM ET

March 31, 2011

If you are still Armenian...

Do not forget that your people has lived with those people you call mentally ill more than 800 years. Do you think Turks waited 800 years and changed their mind in 1915 to kill you?

You do not know anything!

Anyway...
Again, if you are still exist, you should thank to Turks who saved you...

 

OHABEY

10:18 PM ET

March 31, 2011

From the Jewish Community of Turkey

"I am proud that Unites States can be a partner in this alliance linking us to the country of Ataturk and to the ideals Ataturk helped establish in Turkey and the world" - John F. Kennedy (Just in case Mr. Homans does not know about JFK as well... Charles, Kennedy was the 35th President of the United States)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7RfCGap0Pic

"As early as 1933 Ataturk invited numbers of prominent German Jewish professors to flee Nazi Germany and settle in Turkey." - Jewish Community of Turkey

http://www.turkyahudileri.com/content/view/246/272/lang,en/

"... the various aspects of the personality and deeds of Atatürk whose objective was to promote world peace, international understanding and respect for human rights... " - UNSECO

http://www.columbia.edu/~sss31/Turkiye/ata/hayati.html#unesco
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atat%C3%BCrk_Centennial

 

NYOPED

11:07 PM ET

March 31, 2011

A new generation of journalists

This photo essay is more damaging to FP's image as a serious paper than it is to that Ataturk as a leader. Aspiring to be a foreign affairs expert, Charles Homans needs to learn more about Ataturk.

What bothered me more is that two other young journalists, both from respected newspapers, Nick Confessore from New York Times and Suzy Khimm from Mother Jones , reweeted this photo essay using the word "evildoer" without questioning its content . Would they retweet a photo essay about foreigners living in the US featuring Obama's profile? I cannot imagine them feeding the birthers. Not because I know them but I (want to) trust journalists from institutions like New York Times, FP and Mother Jones.

 

SELCUKBR

1:19 AM ET

April 1, 2011

to Charles Homans who thinks himself a journalist

When a stupid man is doing something he is ashamed of, he always declares that it is his duty.

 

BARABBAS

4:09 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Why?

Charles Homan - just like Foreign Policy itself - is a guided missile who hits the big money's target. Question is why is he doing that? Is Obama sending a support mesaage to anti - atatürk front in Turkey goverment or Armenian and/or Greek lobbies are behind this? No journalist will ever publish a provocative lie such as this without a reason?

 

SHAMEYOU

4:15 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Was Ataturk a dictator?

Shame to you.

This magazine don't know anything about Turkey's history.

Ataturk was first revolutionary leader against global imperialism in world. Ataturk was founder of democracy and modern Turk People. Ataturk was support second parties in system of democracy.

And now, ataturk was dictator? I don't think so. This magazine always remembered with ignorance and too many Turkish people will laugh this article.

Please read some history... Maybe you will be a good journalists.

 

CUNEYT

4:21 AM ET

April 1, 2011

is this?

Is this guy a foreign relations expert? Go read some books sir. Ataturk was not a dictator

 

EMREY?LMAZ

4:33 AM ET

April 1, 2011

GEORG GEORGIAN

Lan senden kac tane daha varsa kaninizda bogacagiz sizi soysuz kopekler .sizinde siraniz gelicek basimizdakiler de bigun gidecekler ama bu yazilanlar kalicak bekleyin.

Bu millet bigun uyanacaktir rahat olun siz!

Anadolu Kartalinin penceleri altinda merhamet diliceksiniz ama cok gec olacak.

Yasasin Vatan Yasasin TÜRK milleti!

 

RIFAT

4:51 AM ET

April 1, 2011

ATATURK NOT DICTATOR

The Writer ! Youre learn about ATATURK and TURKISH history and after write something . ATATURK is not dictator; not killer . ATATURK is grand leader and hero for TURKISH people, he is savior for us. Who say for ATATURK is a killer or dictator or similar it is a big liar. Real killer, Branko Kara?i?, Adolf hittler and similar. Youre learn and write..

 

YESIM

4:54 AM ET

April 1, 2011

ABYSMAL IGNORANCE!

What sort of editor are you charles homans? To be a good and respected journalist, you should research properly your topic first. Ugur Mumcu who was a well respected journalist and specialist at investigative journalism (definitely not like this c. homans,you should learn something from U.Mumcu) says: You are the people who have opinions without having any information!! You are writing something without the knowledge of who exactly Mustafa Kemal Ataturk is! Read,research and then write...If you do not know enough or if you do not know how to research, do not call yourself as a journalist becuse you do not have a clue! Leave the job to other journalists who know how to write!!

Why do not put George Bush here or why can not you put? How about people who have been tortured and killed in Iraq for nothing? So, you are calling Ataturk as a dictator? Check your country first and also your dictators! And do not forget "ignorancy" is the biggest danger for humanity!!

WE LOVE MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATURK WITH ALL OUR HEART AND WE DO KNOW WHAT HE DID FOR US. OBVIOUSLY YOU DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING, SO, PLEASE DO NOT GIVE ANY COMMENT ABOUT HIM BECAUSE YOU ARE MAKING THE MAGAZINE LOOSE ITS SERIOUSNESS!!!

 

KAYGUSUZ

4:55 AM ET

April 1, 2011

CHARLES HOMANS

CHARLES HOMANS

 

KAYGUSUZ

4:55 AM ET

April 1, 2011

CHARLES HOMANS

CHARLES HOMANS

 

TURKLOVER

5:04 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Ataturk?? wow what a big BS who is this idiot? who wrote this

Ataturk is hardly in the same catagory.and for those arManeacs oppps I mean Armenians who is full of hate, why did not Turks kill all this hatefull genocidal bunch when they got the chance, did nt Turks learn anything from Italians

 

BENSMK

5:06 AM ET

April 1, 2011

ATATURK ??

THIS IS AN E P I C M I S T A K E !
and this proves how ignorant you really are.

 

TURKLOVER

5:16 AM ET

April 1, 2011

George is mother still remembers

the big old ckc she lay under during their armenians uprising, gerorge is a after birth of that inncedent, when Turks fuk all the armenians and greeks and guess what they all become male whres after

we should have kill them all all the fukng Turks haters 100 years agoi so we did ot have to deal with them you know there are no real Greeks or armenians they are bunch of Turkish bastereds we left behind

 

KEMALIST

5:18 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Ataturk is a democrat and a savior. Correct this error!

Ataturk is a leader in a great humanist and democrat. Ataturk should be ignorant to say that the dictator.

152 of the country, "Who is Ataturk?" response to the question is this:
"Atatürk is:
An outstanding person who devoted himself for
the development of international understanding,
cooperation and peace, a revolutionist who realized extraordinary reforms, the first Leader who fought against imperialism and colonialism.
A unique Statesman respectful to human rights, pioneer of worldwide peace,
who never discriminated people according to their color religion or race through out his life, founder of Turkish Republic."

Such a disrespect, ignorance is not acceptable. Read the book a little ignorant. Wherein the situation might get rid of the infamous and hilarious.

Remove from this list, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk!

 

LAKDSLKAJDSFIE

5:20 AM ET

April 1, 2011

reader53

Well, well, FOREIGN POLICY, published by the Slate Group,
has fallen to a very simple "click baiting" headlines and stories.
If you are a Turk(as I am) do not help FP ! It's all about how many viewers they get.
The hack(i will not dignify this low life, CHARLES HOMANS by calling him a WRITER OR A HISTORIAN, is just doing his job for his masters...
TISK, Tisk , FP, new lows...
p.s. example bellow:

http://www.ehow.com/how_5028978_write-copy-attracts-traffic.html

..."
Instructions

1
Know your audience. This may seem like an obvious step, but many web masters and bloggers only think they know their audience. You must get into the hearts and the minds of your readers.

2
Read comments. Your web visitors will often post comments agreeing or disagreeing with your articles and posts. You can agree with their comments, or not, but don't ignore them. Comments can be nuggets of gold for upcoming article ideas and continued conversations.

3
Check your search engine keywords. Look at your stats package for the most popular keywords people use to find you. These can be hints for what content works for your readers."...

 

EVALUTION

5:22 AM ET

April 1, 2011

daughter of M.K. Atatürk

dear foreign policy editors,

the list entitled "stiff upper lip" on your website claims that our great leader mustafa kemal atatürk was a moustached dictator along with saddam hussein, stalin, franco and hitler. this is unacceptable by turkish people as our leader did not have moustache after the foundation of the republic.

please remove ataturk from this list and apologize from turkish nation. otherwise we will show you what it means.

kind regards,

 

CUSTEN

5:23 AM ET

April 1, 2011

FP - a lifetime of respect lost in an article

Shame on your editorial staff for letting a ridiculous comparison like this be published.

 

KAYGUSUZ

5:26 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Dear Mr.Homans, After I have

Dear Mr.Homans,
After I have read your article I've immediatly thought 3 possibilities:
a-you don't like reading or
b-you do like amusing by writting or
c-you do like and even you adore some lobbiest and their money !?

 

KEMALIST

5:27 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Fix it!

ATATURK father of the Turkish nation.
He is not a dictator.
He is not a killer.
Not autocratic.

MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATURK a democrat. Humanist, Democratic Revolutionary, People's lover of the anti-imperialist.

Mr. Charles Homans can not accept such an insult. Made against the Turkish nation, this disrespect is unacceptable. Fix it!

 

ATAM1

5:34 AM ET

April 1, 2011

pretending that you are a journalist

I condemn those who false advertise and present themselves as a journalist. First know your sources, check and confirm the correctness of information that you are submitting, if you are not pretending that you are a journalist

Ataturk is one of the greatest leader the world has ever seen and known. You can try to smear his name with mud, but you can never get here, just as the sun you can not foul with mud. He was and he is our sun, our father, our pride. I am proud to be Turk, I am proud to have a father like Atatürk.

 

UMUT_GUNDUZ

5:37 AM ET

April 1, 2011

wrong address

Ataturk is a leader in woman rights, democracy, liberalization and establishing republic instead of monarchy. This article is written without knowledge and insight. It is not worth criticising. This magazine is only provocateur.

Everybody can understand who is dictator when looking at vietnam, cuba, Iraq, afghanistan, kuwait and all other invasions/occupaitons all over the world. It doesn't matter who is the president.

 

HOTLAN

5:48 AM ET

April 1, 2011

"I obtained information

"I obtained information concerning Mustafa Kemal from someone who knows him very well. When talking with Foreign Minister Litvinov of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, he said that in his opinion, the most valuable and interesting statesman in all of Europe does not live in Europe today, but beyond the Bosphorus, he lives in Ankara, and that this was the President of the Turkish Republic, Gazi Mustafa Kemal Atatürk."

Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States of America

"In connection with the permanent memorial facility for Kemal Atatürk, I take pride in presenting my congratulations to Turkey. Your great country that is advancing on the course that he demonstrated has obtained very significant successes. This ceremony that is being held to commemorate the memory of Atatürk, the architect of progress and Turkish unity, is a very appropriate respect to a person who became a source of inspiration to free peoples throughout the world."

Dwight D. Eisenhower, President of the United States of America

"The name of Atatürk reminds people of the historical successes of one of the great individuals of this century, the leadership that gave inspiration to the Turkish nation, farsightedness in the understanding of the modern world and courage and power as a military leader. It is without a doubt that another example can't be shown indicating greater successes than the birth of the Turkish Republic and ever since then Atatürk's and Turkey's broad and deep reforms undertaken as well as the confidence of a nation in itself."

John F. Kennedy, President of the United States of America

"Atatürk's death is not only a loss for the country, but for Europe is the greatest loss, he who saved Turkey in the war and who revived a new the Turkish nation after the war. The sincere tears shed after him by all classes of people is nothing other than an appropriate manifestation to this great hero and modern Turkey's Ata."

Winston Churchill, Prime Minister of the United Kingdom

 

LESIDENTITESMEURTRIERES

5:52 AM ET

April 1, 2011

We are proud of still having you as our lader in our hearts!

1- please be smarter and read in order just have an idea about the difference between

 

LESIDENTITESMEURTRIERES

5:52 AM ET

April 1, 2011

We are proud of still having you as our lader in our hearts!

1- please be smarter and read in order just have an idea about the difference between

 

BARAN34

6:04 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Wrong Information

Dear Charles Homans,
It's not acceptable to call Atatürk a dictator. He was the president of the republic and he let other politicians to found new parties to join elections. Now we have a lot of political parties unlike USA. And this is democracy, thanks to Atatürk we have options when we vote.
It is a shame to see his name with Hitler, Mussolini etc.
I believe you better find some sources about this extra-ordinary man: Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, and read it, so you may have an idea about Atatürk's life.

 

MUSTAFA1881

6:12 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Know anything about him?

you must be SON OF A BITCH!

 

SULE

6:13 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Research?

I guess Mr.Homans has included Ataturk in the list just by looking at this picture and not doing an in-depth research.
Do you know M.Ghandi Mr.Homans? He was the political and ideological leader of India during their Independence Movement. So was Ataturk for Turkish people; he was the leader during the Turkish Independence Movement.
And not a single Armenian or Jewish person living in Turkey thinks the opposite, either.
Thoughts and feelings about people are subjective and everyone is free to express them. (As we can see in the majority of the comments made) But this article is about historical facts that could be discovered by some research and study that you obviously failed to do...
Well, we're human and we all make mistakes. If you decide to revisit your list and make a comprehensive research, you're most welcome to do so in Turkey. I'm positive that you'd be provided with the necessary information.
Regards

 

LESIDENTITESMEURTRIERES

6:19 AM ET

April 1, 2011

stop crying!!!!

1- the difference between a "genocide" and "forced emigration".
"Genocide" is killing people, including the youngests and babies with their mothers before birth, sexual violation in order to give birth from your blood, aim to make a tribe become extinct;
just as the Armenians did in Hocali, Azerbaijan.

2- dates of giving women the political right to elect and be elected: 1930 in Turkey

These are only the first two subjects came to my mind after having a quick read.
Not for all but only for those who still drivel; please don'be so naive and stop crying claiming that you we massacred bu the Turks. It was the Armenian locals who cooperated with the Russian and French soldiers and killed their years old Turkish and Kurdish neighbours; and faced with a counter attack by the kurds living on that geography.

The only critisizm for the Ottoman governance to be done about the Armenian emigration can be that they were inadequate or partly reluctant to provide the secure conditiouns on the way they migrate. How ever, please be smart and think that it was the First World War conditions and must be evaluated according to that reality.

What happened in the Balkans and Hocali against the Muslims were 75 years later, under the direct witnessing of Europe and United Nations!

Forget everything and just check the dates: The Armenian emigration has nothing to do with Ataturk, who ruled the modern Turkish Republic years later after defeating the occupiers!

as one of the World leaders said after they were defeated in the Turkish Independence War: Their bad luck (or misfortune) was that the genius of the last century arose from Anatolia!

I believe that, everybody must be more careful while using words such as "massacre", "genocide", or "dictator". Come on please, Ataturk and "dictatorship"!!!!!

 

ATAM1

6:20 AM ET

April 1, 2011

You are Wrong!!!

Dear Author,
You are Wrong; Admitt you're made a mistake. Regret your error. Put the the greatest name or ATATURK away from this list.

We await your apologye

 

F?L?Z ALDEM?R

6:22 AM ET

April 1, 2011

YOU HAVE TO LEARN WHO ?S ATATÜRK....

ATATÜRK IS LEADER OF TURKISH PEOPLE AND FOUNDER OF OUR REPUBLIC OF TURK?YE AND ALSO IS GENIUS IN 20TH CENTURY.

ATATÜRK IS NOT ONLY MILITARY GENIUS, ALSO IS DIPLOMATIC AND STATEMAN GENIUS.HE IS THE MOST SUCCESSFUL LEADER IN 20TH CENTURY . STATEMEN AND SCIENCEMEN OF 20TH CENTURY ACCEPT ATATÜRK AS GENIUS OF 20TH CENTURY.

IF YOUR JOB ?S JOURNALIST OR AUTHOR ,I SUGGEST YOU THAT YOU NEED TO RESEARCH BETTER AND MORE INFORMATION WHEN YOU WILL WRITE. I WARN YOU TO WRITE STRUCTURE THAT YOU DON'T KNOW ANYTHING AND ALSO TO WRITE L?KE MAGAZINE.
I THINK NEWSPAPER THAT YOU WRITE ?SNOT MAGAZINE .

ANALOGY ?S COMPLETELY WRONG THAT YOU MENTIONED ABOUT YOUR ARTICLE PEOPLE LIVED PAST (LIKE KAISER ) .

WE , TURKISH PEOPLE GAIN OUR IDEOLOGY FROM ATATÜRK , AND WE KNOW HISTORY VERY WELL (ESPECIALLY TURKISH HISTORY).

ONCE AGAIN,I SUGGEST YOU TO RESEARCH MORE AND WELL WHEN YOU DECIDE TO WRITE AN ARTICLE ABOUT HISTORY.
IF ALSO YOU HAVE DESIRE IDEOLOGICAL ANALOGY, I SUGGEST YOU TO STAR FROM YOUR COUNTRY,YOU HAVE MORE SOURCE (I THINK).

IN RECENT YEARS, YOU HAVE TWO PRESIDENT THAT THREAT LIFE OF SOME COUNTRY AND PEOPLE : OBAMA AND GEORGE BUSH.

LET YOU LOOK AND WRITE ABOUT THEM....WE WANT TO LEARN ABOUT THEM MORE.......

F?L?Z ALDEM?R

TÜRK?YE

 

F?L?Z ALDEM?R

6:22 AM ET

April 1, 2011

YOU HAVE TO LEARN WHO ?S ATATÜRK....

ATATÜRK IS LEADER OF TURKISH PEOPLE AND FOUNDER OF OUR REPUBLIC OF TURK?YE AND ALSO IS GENIUS IN 20TH CENTURY.

ATATÜRK IS NOT ONLY MILITARY GENIUS, ALSO IS DIPLOMATIC AND STATEMAN GENIUS.HE IS THE MOST SUCCESSFUL LEADER IN 20TH CENTURY . STATEMEN AND SCIENCEMEN OF 20TH CENTURY ACCEPT ATATÜRK AS GENIUS OF 20TH CENTURY.

IF YOUR JOB ?S JOURNALIST OR AUTHOR ,I SUGGEST YOU THAT YOU NEED TO RESEARCH BETTER AND MORE INFORMATION WHEN YOU WILL WRITE. I WARN YOU TO WRITE STRUCTURE THAT YOU DON'T KNOW ANYTHING AND ALSO TO WRITE L?KE MAGAZINE.
I THINK NEWSPAPER THAT YOU WRITE ?SNOT MAGAZINE .

ANALOGY ?S COMPLETELY WRONG THAT YOU MENTIONED ABOUT YOUR ARTICLE PEOPLE LIVED PAST (LIKE KAISER ) .

WE , TURKISH PEOPLE GAIN OUR IDEOLOGY FROM ATATÜRK , AND WE KNOW HISTORY VERY WELL (ESPECIALLY TURKISH HISTORY).

ONCE AGAIN,I SUGGEST YOU TO RESEARCH MORE AND WELL WHEN YOU DECIDE TO WRITE AN ARTICLE ABOUT HISTORY.
IF ALSO YOU HAVE DESIRE IDEOLOGICAL ANALOGY, I SUGGEST YOU TO STAR FROM YOUR COUNTRY,YOU HAVE MORE SOURCE (I THINK).

IN RECENT YEARS, YOU HAVE TWO PRESIDENT THAT THREAT LIFE OF SOME COUNTRY AND PEOPLE : OBAMA AND GEORGE BUSH.

LET YOU LOOK AND WRITE ABOUT THEM....WE WANT TO LEARN ABOUT THEM MORE.......

F?L?Z ALDEM?R

TÜRK?YE

 

OZGE

6:31 AM ET

April 1, 2011

THE GREATEST LEADER IN HISTORY:MUSTAFA KEMAL ATAÜRK

You have no right to make people know things wrong and you have no right to accuse our great leader in this way.you cant say his name even with those people there in same sentence.
Mustafa Kemal ATATÜRK is savior of ours.He saved us from you and from your mandate.He didnt let you enter this country and ruin here.Thats why you saying as he dictator.Because you couldnt get what you want.you couldnt get Turks and Turkey under your control.Because you couldnt make Turkey like other Iraq.Thats why you dont like him and saying bullshits about him.
But whatever you say or whatever you do,Mustafa Kemal ATATÜRK is the greatest leader in the whole history of world.He got democracy in Turkey.He gave rights to women,made them real part of society.He made lots of revolutions and they are just for progressing the whole country.Thats why you dont like him.Because he made us progress in everyway.
We lived all in peace until these days in Turkey.In whole country we are one!all races,all religions,all of us is one!you people and governments from usa and other europian countries just trying to seperate us here,but WE WON'T!We won't give you what you want.we will always continue progressing in our great leader way!
Thats why you making up all those lies!because YOU ARE AFRAID OF TURKS AND OUR GREAT LEADER MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATÜRK!and you better!
Because we are strong!we are one!
writer of those topic charles homans you have to search correctly your topic then write it.you cant write wrong things and make people who dont know real know wrong!you have to learn history first!
you cant write about ATATÜRK or put ATATÜRK in anywhere in unrespectful way.you cant even say his name in unrespectful way.
you people are real dictators who kills people for just oils and lands.you are the ones who kills all innocent people,babies,kids!
YOU HAVE TO APOLOGIZE FOR THIS WRONG FROM TURKS! AND NEVER USE OUR GREAT LEADER'S NAME IN ANY WRONG AND UNRESPECTFUL WAY!
MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATÜRK BORNED ONCE BUT HE LEFT MILLIONS OF MUSTAFA KEMALS AFTER HE DIED!AND WE ARE HERE!
WORLD HAVENT SEEN ANY GREAT LEADER LIKE HIM AND WON'T SEE AGAIN!
ANY NATION WOULD BE PROUD OF THEIR LEADER AS MUCH AS WE ARE ABOUT ATATÜRK!
HE IS ALWAYS WITH US!

 

EMREY?LMAZ

6:31 AM ET

April 1, 2011

UYAN TÜRK UYAN ARTIK !

ASALA'YI BITIRDIGIMIZ GIBI KAC TANE DAHA VARSA NEFESINI KESECEGIZ.

BUTUN DUNYA TURK GUCUNU GORECEK!

 

RANGER

6:32 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Stop here.

You can not evaluate and interpret Ataturk. Can not gain in popularity over the great leader Ataturk. Doing so, insult to the Turkish people.

 

ECE ELICIN

6:37 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Stiff Malice about Ataturk

Haven't heard about Charles Homans, but if FP Magazine was remarkable, at least an editor with some history knowledge should have edited this unfortunate article.

Please read some history to understand why a nation followed / follows / will follow Ataturk with proud.

 

KOKO3434

6:43 AM ET

April 1, 2011

we are sons of atatürk

you must be really dickhead . you need to learn our history or you can ask your grandfathers

 

DESI

6:45 AM ET

April 1, 2011

THE GREATEST LEADER IN HISTORY:MUSTAFA KEMAL ATAÜRK

this is most polite answer : Fuck

 

DESI

6:52 AM ET

April 1, 2011

why??

WHY DONT YOU PUT GEORGE W BUSH AND OBAMA RIGHT NOW

 

HAKAN BEY

6:48 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Atatürk = Real Democracy

i dont understand, how american people cant like atatürk.
Atatürk build the relationship between Turkey and USA till this day. We are allies in economic areas and espially in military areas.
There is also a video on youtube, where atatürk and a american polician standing sight to sight, and atatürk is beginning his interview with, something like:" Dear honorable proud amercian people....".
How can you not like a atatürk, maybe your not a democrat!
I am surprised how uneducated people can be journalists.

 

CENGIZ SARIKAYALI

7:15 AM ET

April 1, 2011

To the attention of Charles Homans

To the attention of
Charles Homans,

What a shame!

First of all, let me point out that your article that appeared today on Foreign Policy's internet page is a big mistake.

How unfortunate!

Your historical facts are biassed, devoid of proper research and therefore extremely shallow. In my letter, I wouldn't even go into any further detail or argue with you for the sake of arguing about the damages caused in the hearts of a whole nation with your article "stiff upper lips", which is a total nonsense!

What I propose and urge you to do is: give yourself a treat and take a retreat to one of the secluded places on the Aleutian Islands with your unbiassed history books and study Mustafa Kemal Ataturk alongside with George Washington or Abraham Lincoln! Listen to the birds chirping. Maybe even sailing in the tranquil deep cold waters of the Pacific Ocean will do you good and activate your intellect.

Don't please confuse facts with visions. Do not make the mistake of comparing prominent historical figures' beards, wigs, moustaches and black or white hair. Try to see and fit everything in their proper historical perspectives. Try and see what those leaderships mean to America and Turkey.

Do not forget, what Mustafa Kemal Ataturk means to us Turks is exactly the the same as what George Washington or Abraham Lincoln mean to the American nation.

Take my advice, it might be a good idea for you to take TIME Magazine's most esteemed copy of March 1923, issue #24. You'll get a better grasp of the subject and it will give you a good chance to reshuffle your historical facts.

Last but not least, I think you owe a big apology to a nation very proud of its eternal Father, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk.

Cengiz Sarikayali

 

REVOLUTIONARY

7:15 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Obama approves democratic rule of Ataturk

“I am honored to pay tribute to Mustafa Kemal Ataturk,” Obama wrote in a visitors’ book at Ataturk’s tomb, praising him for putting Turkey on “the path to democracy.” The Turkish leader’s “legacy continues to inspire generations around the world,” Obama wrote.

The ignorance of the author is .... Stunning.

 

XOTTOMAN

7:16 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Charles Homans, type go to the news magazine. And for the good o

Which dictator has been involved take a multi-party regime. Involved with the council to open, even if the war. To shut down or been involved with the council to remove the effects of excluding all of the Ataturk. Read a little history ... Charles Homans, type go to the news magazine. And for the good of your people, comedy can be ...

 

FURKAN

7:16 AM ET

April 1, 2011

...

Ataturk is one of the brightest minds in the human history
Is is an ashame to list Ataturk in the list of dictators or autocrats or whatever you call it. He is the father of modern Republic of Turkey and beloved commander, teacher, president, leader and founder of Turkish people. Your irrevelant article I am sure, does not mean anything who knows enough about Mustafa Kemal Ataturk.

Rest at peace Mustafa Kemal ATATURK, founder of the modern Republic of Turkey.

 

REVOLUTIONARY

7:21 AM ET

April 1, 2011

So much comments, no need to read all of them.

freedom of speech is one thing, but facts cannot be subjective; therefore I assume the writer has a bad intent on Turks sensibilities.

This kind of attack is childish and only lowers the reputation of the writer. Nothing more I say.

 

AHMETT

7:32 AM ET

April 1, 2011

atatruk

During his lifetime ataturk always prevented any election to be happen in Turkey because he knew that he would lost the elections. Today you can see his statues and pictures everywhere. You have to put his picture to all government related buildings. You can not even criticize him otherwise you will find yourself in prison (if you are lucky). He is one of the greatest dictators ever.

 

GENERALDUNCAN

7:41 AM ET

April 1, 2011

AHMETT what are babbling about?

You're ignorant and a liar. He never prevented elections. He was elected to presidency by the parliament's votes. Ataturk even convinced his friends to start up a new political party to compete his own. How come does he be a dictator then? What did you think, loser?

 

GENERALDUNCAN

7:42 AM ET

April 1, 2011

AHMETT what are you babbling about?

You're ignorant and a liar. He never prevented elections. He was elected to presidency by the parliament's votes. Ataturk even convinced his friends to start up a new political party to compete his own. How come does he be a dictator then? What did you think, loser?

 

SEFFAR

7:37 AM ET

April 1, 2011

I am just shocked

I just can not understand how you can compare Ataturk with such kind of people. Ataturk did a lot for his country and deserves great respect. This article is written by an ignorant and a racist. Disgusting really

 

SEFFAR

7:41 AM ET

April 1, 2011

To you Ahmett

I am not Turkish but I spent over a decade in Turkey. What you said is very wrong. No one is forced to put Ataturk picture. Turkish people love Ataturk and for good reasons. And Ahmet, in case you are turkish, you should b ashamed of yourself. Like what Ataturk said, ne mutlu turkum diyene, and I wish i were Turkish

 

ONDER SARIKAYA

7:48 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Mr. Pinochet

Ho?w come Mr. Pinochet was not on the list? Or it is just that he was an ally?.. Get wiser Mr. Homans!, if you can!..

 

RSMCTN

7:51 AM ET

April 1, 2011

To the attention of Charles Homans

Are you stupid?

Does not know himself, what is not certain that the service, stupid with a post came across.

Great leader, war hero, which is the subject of legends all over the world today, stood trembling in the face of great fathers, blue-eyed giant known as Mustafa Kemal Atatürk 's the real source of life and they have to learn as soon as possible.

Embarrassment and disability as soon as possible stating your writing you want to publish.

 

WESTUPIDFOREINGPOCLIY

7:57 AM ET

April 1, 2011

You have not seen a magazine

You have not seen a magazine so stupid

He is the father of modern Republic of Turkey and beloved commander, teacher, president, leader and founder of Turkish people.

 

AHMETT

7:57 AM ET

April 1, 2011

answer

There is a law in Turkey. All of the governmet related buildings, including schools, hospitals have to put the Ataturk picture on the walls. Most of the people treat ataturk as a prophet in turkey because they are brainwashed. Starting from age 4 they are brainwashed that ataturk is the greatest lider etc.. Eventually it lead to a new religion in turkey called "kemalizm". Turkey has blocked youtube for almost 2 years because it has some children from greece uploaded videos teasing ataturk. You can understand the seriousness of the situation from there.

 

YASINERDOGMUS

8:20 AM ET

April 1, 2011

ahmett this answer is coming you

We do not accept Ataturk as a prophet please dont say anything like that Kemalizm is not a religion also. we , AS Turkish people, AS Muslims we like Ataturk OK? we Can't and Won't accept Ataturk as a prophet, he was just a leader and founder of Turkey.

 

AHMETT

8:02 AM ET

April 1, 2011

dersim genocide

ataturk has directed a military campaign at Dersim (today Tunceli) which lead to 50.000 civillian deaths.

 

YASINERDOGMUS

8:09 AM ET

April 1, 2011

I just say that please delete

I just say that please delete this article from here and after apologize from all of Turkish people. you wrote lots of mistakes

 

AHMETT

8:16 AM ET

April 1, 2011

funny comments

Why do you think that the whole world is going to believe that ataturk is not a dictator. You believe it in your country from extremely biased history books and brainwashing. But if you look around, you will see that you are the only ones who is believing. Your nonsense arguments will not convience anybody. You can start to read history books from outside so that you won't be shocked when you hear this things.

 

EFEORKUN

8:21 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Ataturk wasn't a dictator

This article clearly shows lack of information about history of Turkish republic.The author has no idea about his political personality.A dictator is a ruler (e.g. absolutist or autocratic) who assumes sole and absolute power (sometimes but not always with military control) but without hereditary ascension such as an absolute monarch.Ataturk has never assumed absolute power.His conflict was against the absolut power and he fought for republic.We gained our freedom and republic with sacrifice.

Author's misinformation decreases FP's reputation and this misinformation should be deleted if foreign policy cares its reputation.

 

ALPERDEM

10:53 AM ET

April 1, 2011

TO ISOON GREEN

Hay ya?a be aslan?m. Bizim gibiler oldukça bu vatan?n s?rt? yere gelmez..

TC vatanda?? ecdad? Arap bir Türk. ??te o benim.

 

ALPERDEM

10:56 AM ET

April 1, 2011

TO ISOON GREEN

Hay yasa be aslanim. Bizim gibiler oldukça bu vatanin sirti yere gelmez.

Ici Ataturk sevgisi ile dolu T.C. vatandasi ecdadi Arap bir Turk. Iste o benim.

 

DICTATORHATER

8:36 AM ET

April 1, 2011

No body in the wold yet..

Yes no body in the wold succeded what Ataturk did. He was the most clever soldier, also he could set-up a republic with people who cannor read or write. Who can change the letter the community use from arabic alfabet to latin alfabet, who can venture such a thing? I can understand why you hate him, you are right at this point; because he did not let you kill all the Turks in Anatolia..He did not let you control people in Anatolia. He did not let you exploit Turkey..For this reason you try to make a shot him by mustache. Real dictators are livnig in west, behind their mask and killing poor people without looking behind.

 

DERYASENTURK

8:45 AM ET

April 1, 2011

USA IS THE DICTATOR OF WORLD WITHOUT MUSTACHE

Mustafa Kemal ATATURK is the greatest leader of our century and he doesn't belong this list. Searching a bit and reading history will help Mr. Homans to dawn on. He can use any of USA Presidents name instead of ATATURK. Since they are all the dictators for whole world. Can he also explain what are they doing in Libya? Are they saving Libyan people by killing them? Is USA tried to help any country who has not petrol (or any other source to exploit) ? USA is the dictator of the world without mustache!!!

 

TECHNOMANIA34

8:47 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Unscholarly

Dear Charles HOMANS, Your journalism internship failed. You have a bad historical knowledge. You can not finish this school. LOL

ATATURK English means; Father of the Turks. This is important.

 

MELLY

9:24 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Shame on you

You have no idea about Mustafa Kemal ATATURK. You have no idea about his personality. Shame on you Mr. Homans!

 

HAKAN YILDIZ

9:27 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Journalist or salesman

Mr.Homans,

How I see your essay,
i. You hate Turks since you write such ignorant things about Ataturk and you show this by trying to insult him cause you know it will hurt us.
and/or
ii. You donot care about truth and you just want to sell this (which apparently worked.)

Whichever is valid, I can't know but you shouldnot be writing in a reputable magazine though I would defend your right to say your word.

 

OGUZSERTBAS

9:32 AM ET

April 1, 2011

This is not suprise !

I know you western people likes saying always he is a dictator,we've democracy ,we've most strong civilazition ,you're bad boys gaddafi-saddam so give your wealt to me like oil cuz we said bro,you're biggest gangsta ! etc.
Hey i wanna say something for u American media and govt(not American People) your age is over ! Dragons are coming to slowly ,you have to care about that . You should't ...k with our history and our heroes. And Charles homans,if you don't trust turkish historians about "Turkish History and M. Kemal Atatürk" maybe you will read Bernard Lewis,Faroz Ahmad , Jean Paul Roux etc. Maybe you should investigate your presidents what did said about Atatürk

 

CCCMUSTAFAKEMALCCC

9:42 AM ET

April 1, 2011

we trust inci

senin o yazi yazan ellerini sikiiim.senin o düsünen beyinin kivrimlarini sikiim.senin o canakkaleye gelip de siki tutarak geri donen yedi sulaleni sikiiim orospunun evladi.nasil bir kuyruk acisidir ki hala çikaramamissiniz aklinizdan.senin burda yazi yazmana izin veren zihniyetin de ta amina koyiyim ben.düsünemeyen orospu cocugu.buraya annenin biyikli fotografini koy.sora da siktir ol git.

not:sakin falan degilim.

ccc inci siker ccc

 

INCISIKER

9:56 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Glorious Turks

one day my mortal body will turn to dust. but the turkish republic will stand forever

 

CCCMUSTAFAKEMALCCC

10:01 AM ET

April 1, 2011

inci we trust

senin o yazi yazan ellerini sikiiim.senin o düsünen beyinin kivrimlarini sikiim.senin o canakkaleye gelip de siki tutarak geri donen yedi sulaleni sikiiim orospunun evladi.nasil bir kuyruk acisidir ki hala çikaramamissiniz aklinizdan.senin burda yazi yazmana izin veren zihniyetin de ta amina koyiyim ben.düsünemeyen orospu cocugu.buraya annenin biyikli fotografini koy.sora da siktir ol git.

not:sakin falan degilim.

ccc inci siker ccc

 

CCCREYIZCCC

10:09 AM ET

April 1, 2011

CHARLES HOMANS

hey ! mr mustache fetish

T U R K S will get ur tight @ss asap !

 

SENIHA

10:11 AM ET

April 1, 2011

You Need To Understand !

Look Charles,
Now, you are so proud what you write! After all !
But You have to understand How much we love him.He is like our father,and we love him as a child.If you know what the meaning of love you have to apologize from all of us. Childs of ATATURK

 

CCCREYIZCCC

10:16 AM ET

April 1, 2011

CHARLES HOMANS

charles be aware man !!

we looking for you !

 

CCCMUSTAFAKEMALCCC

10:18 AM ET

April 1, 2011

inci siksin seni

lan homasn dolu.seni yazdigin koseye kistirip de sikiiim.seni bütün inci siktin gotunun ustune oturama b? daha orospunun evladi.babaanneni sikiiim

 

CCCREYIZCCC

10:21 AM ET

April 1, 2011

CHARLES HOMANS

hey ! mr mustache fetish

T U R K S will get ur tight @ss !!!

 

ALPERDEM

10:26 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Ataturk was not a dictator!!!

Please, please, please. People who create a product which is highly related to public, it is so important to search the correctness of the data. Please verify it again and again. How can you call a magnificent leader as "dictator"?. How dare you? Do you think that it is ethical to make assumptions about a leader who have changed the destiny of a whole nation? Have you ever come to Türkiye? Have you ever asked Turkish people why we call him as "ATATÜRK", "Father of the Turks". Is it because he is a dictator? Do you think that it is logical? Why we aggressively react such an assumption to our leader? Is it because he was a dictator, but still we love him? Do you think that it is logical? Mustafa Kemal Atatürk was a great leader who gave us our life again as a nation. Do you know Lloyd George's words? Would you mind if I remind you please: " The world produces only a genius for every century. Genius of this century, unfortunately, has been bestowed on the Turks." Thus, please never again dare to name our ATATÜRK as "dictator" or "autocrat". He was a genius. Please memorize it: "Genius, and a leader".

 

ONURGN35

10:46 AM ET

April 1, 2011

PATHETIC...

Anyone with a small piece of common sense would agree that Ataturk is not a leader to be classified together with guys like Hitler, Stalin or Franco. I am sure you also know that. But I understand that you still have that pain in your back because he kicked your ass so hard in Dardanelles and then did the same to your Greek puppets. The only thing you can do now is to try to damage his legacy, that is what you are trying to do.

You are pathetic. I pity you, really I do...

 

CCCREYIZCCC

10:50 AM ET

April 1, 2011

CHARLES HOMANS

hey ! mr mustache fetish

T U R K S will get ur tight @ss

 

ULANAYI

11:28 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Thank you Mr. Homans, you are

Thank you Mr. Homans, you are great because you showed us "nobody can buy a
clean history" those who try to abuse history are not decent human beings.

What the Turks dont know or deny this person was not a Turk, instead of Jewish
origins, similar to Adolf Hitler which was not a real German.

For the non turk readers here is a brief summery of what this person and his likes done to
the original habitants of Asia minor:

1896 genocide of 0,4 million Armenians
1915 genocide of 1,5 million Armenians
1918 genocide of 1 million Black-Sea Greeks
1922 genocide of 0,5 million Greeks and Armenians in Symrna
1938 genocide of 120 000 Kurds in Dersim

 

RANDOMIZED

11:51 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Why would it matter?

Why would it matter whether he were Jewish? Is being Jewish a bad thing?

 

RANDOMIZED

10:57 AM ET

April 1, 2011

Huntingtonian worldview

The legacy of Samuel Huntington dictates that "they are fundamentally different than us". Charles Homans probably thinks that a leader from the "other world" (Mustafa Kemal Ataturk) can only be similar to only the worst of "our world" (Hitler, Franco, etc).

Ataturk, the founding father of modern Turkey, assumes that "mankind is a single body and each nation a part of that body"

Huntington, founding father of Foreign Policy magazines, assumes that world civilizations are fundamentally different.

Ataturk asserts that "unless a nation's life faces peril, war is murder".

Huntington asserts that war between civilizations are inevitable. (And we might as well strike first)

 

LORDOFKRUNSULL

11:27 AM ET

April 1, 2011

first of all Do u know who he is ?

just answer this question who like this via facebook!!!

 

LORDOFKRUNSULL

11:27 AM ET

April 1, 2011

first of all Do u know who he is ?

just answer this question who like this via facebook!!!

 

CENGAW

11:50 AM ET

April 1, 2011

READ TO LEARN

[close]

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
"Atatürk" redirects here. For other uses, see Atatürk (disambiguation).
Page semi-protected
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk

President Atatürk
1st President of Turkey
In office
29 October 1923 – 10 November 1938
(&000000000000001500000015 years, &000000000000001200000012 days)
Prime Minister Ali Fethi Okyar
?smet ?nönü
Celâl Bayar
Succeeded by ?smet ?nönü
1st Prime Minister of Turkey
In office
3 May 1920 – 24 January 1921
(&00000000000000000000000 years, &0000000000000266000000266 days)
Succeeded by Fevzi Çakmak
1st Speaker of the Parliament of Turkey
In office
24 April 1920 – 29 October 1923
(&00000000000000030000003 years, &0000000000000219000000219 days)
Succeeded by Ali Fethi Okyar
1st Leader of the Republican People's Party
In office
9 September 1923 – 10 November 1938
(&000000000000001500000015 years, &000000000000006200000062 days)
Succeeded by ?smet ?nönü
Born indeterminate 1881 (the date 19 May 1881 was used for official purposes, but there is no certainty he was born on this day)
Selânik, Ottoman Empire (present-day Thessaloniki, Greece)
Died 10 November 1938(1938-11-10) (aged 57)
Dolmabahçe Palace
Istanbul, Turkey
Resting place An?tkabir
Ankara, Turkey
Nationality Turkish
Political party Committee of Union and Progress, Republican People's Party
Spouse(s) Lâtife U?akl?gil (1923–25)
Religion See Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's religious views.
Signature
Military service
Allegiance Ottoman Empire
(1893 – 8 July 1919)
Republic of Turkey
(9 July 1919 – 30 June 1927)
Service/branch Army
Rank Ottoman Empire: General (Pasha)
Republic of Turkey: Mare?al (Marshal)
Commands 19th Division – 16th Corps – 2nd Army – 7th Army – Yildirim Army Group – commander-in-chief of Army of the Government of the Grand National Assembly
Battles/wars Tobruk – Anzac Cove – Chunuk Bair – Scimitar Hill – Sari Bair – Bitlis – Sakarya – Dumlup?nar
Awards List (24 medals)
External Timeline
Graphical Timeline
Detailed Chronology
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (series)
Personal life Birth date · Name · Early life (Education) · Family · Character · Religious beliefs · Will · Publications
Military career Early period · Gallipoli · Caucasus · Sinai and Palestine
Independence War Establishment · Conflicts · Peace
Atatürk's Reforms & Kemalist ideology
Gallery: Picture, Sound, Video
Unbalanced scales.svg
The neutrality of this article is disputed. Please see the discussion on the talk page. Please do not remove this message until the dispute is resolved. (February 2011)

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk (Turkish pronunciation: [mus?tafa ce?mal ata?ty?k]; indeterminate, 1881–10 November 1938) was an Ottoman and Turkish army officer, revolutionary statesman, writer, and the first President of Turkey. He is credited with being the founder of the modern Turkish state.

Atatürk was a military officer during World War I.[1] Following the defeat of the Ottoman Empire in World War I, he led the Turkish national movement in the Turkish War of Independence. Having established a provisional government in Ankara, he defeated the forces sent by the Allies. His military campaigns gained Turkey independence. Atatürk then embarked upon a program of political, economic, and cultural reforms, seeking to transform the former Ottoman Empire into a modern, westernized and secular nation-state. The principles of Atatürk's reforms, upon which modern Turkey was established, are referred to as Kemalism.
Contents
[hide]

* 1 Early life
* 2 Military career
o 2.1 Early years
o 2.2 Italo-Turkish War (1911–1912)
o 2.3 Balkan Wars (1912–1913)
o 2.4 First World War (1914–1918)
o 2.5 Turkish War of Independence (1919–1922)
* 3 Establishment of the Republic of Turkey
* 4 Presidency
o 4.1 Domestic policies
+ 4.1.1 Emergence of the state, 1923–1924
+ 4.1.2 Civic independence and the Caliphate, 1924–1925
+ 4.1.3 Opposition to Kemal in 1924–1927
+ 4.1.4 Modernization efforts, 1926–1930
+ 4.1.5 Opposition to Kemal in 1930–1931
+ 4.1.6 Modernization efforts, 1931–1938
o 4.2 Foreign policies
+ 4.2.1 Issue of Mosul
+ 4.2.2 Relations with the RSFSR/Soviet Union
+ 4.2.3 Turkish-Greek alliance
+ 4.2.4 Neighbours to the east
+ 4.2.5 Turkish Straits
+ 4.2.6 Balkan Pact
+ 4.2.7 Issue of Hatay
o 4.3 Economic policies
+ 4.3.1 State intervention, 1923–1929
+ 4.3.2 Great Depression, 1929–1931
+ 4.3.3 Liberalization and planned growth, 1931–1939
* 5 Personal life
* 6 Legacy
o 6.1 Turkey
+ 6.1.1 Outlawing insults to his reminiscence
o 6.2 Worldwide
* 7 See also
* 8 Notes
* 9 References
* 10 External links

Early life
Main article: Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's personal life

Mustafa was born in either the Ahmed Suba?? neighbourhood or the Islahhane Street (present-day Apostolu Pavlu Street) in the Koca Kas?m Pasha neighbourhood (this house is preserved as a museum) in Selânik,[2] Ottoman Empire, to his mother Zübeyde Han?m (a housewife) and father Ali R?za Efendi (a militia officer, title deed clerk and lumber trader.) Only one of Atatürk's siblings, a sister named Makbule (Atadan) survived childhood; she died in 1956.[3] According to Andrew Mango, he was born into a family which was Muslim, Turkish-speaking and precariously middle-class.[4] Time magazine states that Mustafa Kemal's father was of Albanian and his mother was of Macedonian origin,[5] and Patrick Kinross wrote that he was "as fair as any Slav from beyond the Bulgarian frontier" with "fine white skin" and "eyes of a deep but clear light blue."[6] According to Encyclopaedia Judaica, one assertion that was commonly made by many Jews of Salonika was that Kemal Atatürk was of Doenmeh origin. This view was eagerly embraced by many of Atatürk’s religious opponents and denied by the Turkish government.[7] His father Ali R?za is thought to be of Albanian origin;[8][9][10][11][12] however, according to Falih R?fk? Atay, Ali R?za's ancestors were from Söke in the Ayd?n Province of Anatolia.[13][14] His mother Zübeyde is thought to be of Turkish origin[10][11] and according to ?evket Süreyya Aydemir, she was of Yörük Türkmen ancestry.[15]

Born Mustafa, his second name Kemal (meaning Perfection or Maturity) was given to him by his Mathematics teacher, Captain Üsküplü Mustafa Efendi, according to Afet Inan in admiration of his capability and maturity,[16][17] and according to Ali Fuat Cebesoy, because his teacher Mustafa Efendi wanted to distinguish his student who carried the same name with him,[18] although his biographer Andrew Mango suggests that he may have chosen the name himself as a tribute to the nationalist poet Nam?k Kemal.[19] In his early years, his mother encouraged Mustafa to attend a religious school, something he did reluctantly and only briefly. Later, he attended the ?emsi Efendi School (a private school with a more secular curriculum) at the direction of his father. His parents wanted him to learn a trade, but without consulting them, Atatürk took the entrance exam for a military junior high school in the Ottoman city of Selânik (Salonika, modern Thessaloniki in Greece) in 1893. In 1896, he enrolled into a military high school in the Ottoman city of Manast?r (modern Bitola, Macedonia). On March 14, 1899,[20] he enrolled at the War College in the neighbourhood of Pangalt?[21] within the ?i?li district of the Ottoman capital city Constantinople[22] (modern Istanbul in Turkey) and graduated in 1902. He later graduated from the Military Staff College in Constantinople on 11 January 1905.[20]
Military career
Main article: Military career of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk
Early years
See also: Vatan ve Hürriyet, Committee of Union and Progress, and Young Turk Revolution
Mustafa Kemal as a Senior Captain (Kola?as?) in 1907.

Following graduation, he was assigned to the Fifth Army based in Damascus as a Staff Captain[20] in the company of Ali Fuat (Cebesoy) and Müfit (Özde?).[23] He joined a small secret revolutionary society of reformist officers led by Mustafa (Cantekin) called Vatan ve Hürriyet ("Motherland and Liberty"). On June 20, 1907, he was promoted to the rank of Senior Captain (Kola?as?) and on October 13, 1907, assigned to the headquarters of the Third Army in Manast?r.[24] He joined the Committee of Union and Progress, with membership number 322, although in later years he became known for his opposition to, and frequent criticism of, the policies pursued by the CUP leadership. On June 22, 1908, he was appointed the Inspector of the Ottoman Railways in Eastern Rumelia (Do?u Rumeli Bölgesi Demiryollar? Müfetti?i).[24] In July 1908, he played a role in the Young Turk Revolution which seized power from Sultan Abdülhamid II and restored the constitutional monarchy.

In 1910 he was called to the Ottoman provinces in Albania.[25][26] At that time Isa Boletini was leading Albanian uprisings in Kosovo and there were revolts in Albania.[27][28] In 1910 he met with Eqerem Vlora.[29][30]

Later, in the autumn of 1910, he was among the Ottoman military observers who attended the Picardie army manoeuvres in France.[31]

In early 1911, he worked at the Ministry of War (Harbiye Nezareti) headquarters in Istanbul for a short time.
Italo-Turkish War (1911–1912)
Main article: Italo-Turkish War
See also: Battle of Tobruk (1911)
Binba?? Mustafa Kemal Bey (left) with a Turkish military officer and Bedouin forces in Darnah, Tripolitania Vilayet, 1912.

Later in 1911, he was assigned to the Ottoman Tripolitania Vilayet (present-day Libya) to fight in the Italo-Turkish War, mainly in the areas near Benghazi (Bingazi), Darnah (Derne) and Tobruk. A massive Italian amphibious assault force of 150,000 troops[32] had to be countered by 20,000 Bedouins[33] and 8,000 Turks[33] (a short time before Italy declared war, a large portion of the Turkish troops in Libya were sent to the Ottoman province of Yemen in order to put down the rebellion there, so the Ottoman government was caught with inadequate resources to counter the Italians in Libya; and the British government, which militarily controlled the de jure Ottoman provinces of Egypt and Sudan since the Urabi Revolt in 1882, didn't allow the Ottoman government to send additional Turkish troops to Libya through Egypt; causing the Turkish soldiers like Mustafa Kemal to go to Libya either dressed as Arabs (risking imprisonment if noticed by the British authorities in Egypt), or through very few available ferries (the Italians, who had superior naval forces, effectively controlled the sea routes to Tripoli).) However, despite all the hardships, Mustafa Kemal's forces in Libya managed to successfully repel the Italians in a number of occasions, such as the Battle of Tobruk on 22 December 1911. During the Battle of Darnah on 16-17 January 1912, while Mustafa Kemal was assaulting the Italian-controlled fortress of Kasr-? Harun, two Italian planes dropped bombs on the Ottoman forces and a piece of limestone from a damaged building's rubble entered Mustafa Kemal's left eye; which caused a permanent damage on his left eye's tissue, but not a total loss of sight. After receiving medical treatment for nearly a month (he attempted to leave the Red Crescent's health facilities early after only two weeks, but when his eye's situation worsened, he had to return and resume the treatment) on 6 March 1912 Mustafa Kemal became the Commander of the Ottoman forces in Darnah. He managed to defend and retain the city and its surrounding region until the end of the Italo-Turkish War on 18 October 1912. Mustafa Kemal, Enver Pasha and the other Turkish military commanders in Libya had to return to Istanbul following the outbreak of the Balkan Wars on 8 October 1912, due to which the Ottoman government agreed to surrender the provinces of Tripolitania, Fezzan and Cyrenaica (present-day Libya) to the Kingdom of Italy with the Treaty of Ouchy (First Treaty of Lausanne) signed ten days later, on October 18.
Balkan Wars (1912–1913)
Main article: Balkan Wars
See also: First Balkan War and Second Balkan War

On 1 December 1912, Mustafa Kemal arrived at his new headquarters on the Gallipoli peninsula and during the First Balkan War, he took part in the amphibious landing at Bulair on the coast of Thrace that was commanded by Binba?? Fethi Bey, but this offensive was repulsed during the Battle of Bulair by Georgi Todorov's 7th Lila Infantry Division[34] under the command of Stiliyan Kovachev's Bulgarian Fourth Army.[35]

In June 1913, during the Second Balkan War, he took part in the Ottoman Army forces commanded by Enver Pasha that recovered Dimetoka and Edirne (Adrianople, the capital city of the Ottoman Empire between 1365 and 1453, thus of utmost historic importance for the Turks) together with most of eastern Thrace from the Bulgarians.

In 1913, he was appointed the Ottoman military attaché to all Balkan states (his office was in Sofia, Bulgaria) and promoted to the rank of Kaymakam (Lieutenant Colonel) on March 1, 1914.[20]
First World War (1914–1918)
Main article: World War I
See also: Battle of Gallipoli and Middle Eastern theatre of World War I
Mustafa Kemal in the trenches of Gallipoli with his soldiers, 1915.

In 1914, the Ottoman Empire entered the European and Middle Eastern theatres of World War I allied with the Central Powers. Mustafa Kemal was given the task of organizing and commanding the 19th Division attached to the Fifth Army during the Battle of Gallipoli. Mustafa Kemal became the front-line commander after correctly anticipating where the Allies would attack and holding his position until they retreated. Following the Battle of Gallipoli, Mustafa Kemal served in Edirne until 14 January 1916. He was then assigned to the command of the XVI Corps of the Second Army and sent to the Caucasus Campaign after the massive Russian offensive had reached the Anatolian key cities. On 7 August, Mustafa Kemal rallied his troops and mounted a counteroffensive.[36] Two of his divisions captured Bitlis and Mu?, upsetting the calculations of the Russian Command.[37]

Following this victory, the CUP government in Constantinople proposed to establish a new army in Hejaz (Hicaz Kuvve-i Seferiyesi) and appoint Mustafa Kemal to its command, but he refused the proposal and this army was never established.[31] Instead, on 7 March 1917, Mustafa Kemal was promoted from the command of the XVI Corps to the overall command of the Second Army, although the Czar's armies were soon withdrawn when the Russian Revolution erupted.[36][31]

In July 1917 he was appointed to the command of the Seventh Army, replacing Fevzi Pasha on 7 August 1917, who was under the command of the German general Erich von Falkenhayn's Yildirim Army Group (after the British forces of General Edmund Allenby captured Jerusalem in December 1917, Erich von Falkenhayn was replaced by Otto Liman von Sanders who became the new commander of the Y?ld?r?m Army Group in early 1918.)[31] Mustafa Kemal Pasha could not get along well with General von Falkenhayn and, together with Miralay ?smet Bey, wrote a report to Grand Vizier Talat Pasha regarding the grim situation and lack of adequate resources in the Palestinian front; but Talat Pasha ignored their observations and suggestion that a stronger defensive line should be structured in northern Syria, closer to Anatolia, with Turks rather than Germans in command.[31] Following the rejection of his report, Mustafa Kemal resigned from the Seventh Army and returned to Constantinople.[31] There, he was assigned with the task of accompanying the crown prince (and future sultan) Mehmed Vahideddin during his train trip to Austria-Hungary and Germany.[31] While in Germany, Mustafa Kemal visited the German lines in the west European front and came to the conclusion that the Central Powers would soon lose the war.[31] He did not hesitate to openly express this opinion to Kaiser Wilhelm II and his high-ranking generals in first person.[31] During the return trip, he briefly stayed in Karlsbad and Vienna for medical treatment.[31]

When Mehmed VI became the new Sultan of the Ottoman Empire in July 1918, he called Mustafa Kemal to Constantinople, and in August 1918 assigned him to the command of the Seventh Army in Palestine.[31] Mustafa Kemal arrived in Aleppo on 26 August 1918, then continued south to his headquarters in Nablus. The Seventh Army was holding the central sector of the front lines. On September 19, at the beginning of the Battle of Megiddo, the Eighth Army was holding the coastal flank, but fell apart and Liman Pasha ordered the Seventh Army to withdraw to the north in order to prevent the British from conducting a short envelopment to the Jordan River. The Seventh Army retired towards the Jordan River in fair order and, according to the Armistice of Mudros, signed on October 30, 1918, all German and Austro-Hungarian troops in the Ottoman Empire would be given ample time to withdraw. On October 31, he was appointed to the command of the Y?ld?r?m Army Group, replacing Liman von Sanders. He organized the distribution of weapons to the civilians in Antep in case of a defensive conflict against the invading Allies.[31]

Kemal's last active service in the Ottoman Army was organizing the return of the troops left behind to the south of this line. In early November 1918 the Y?ld?r?m Army Group was officially dissolved and Mustafa Kemal returned to an occupied Constantinople, the Ottoman capital, on 13 November 1918.[31] For a period he worked at the headquarters of the Ministry of War (Harbiye Nezareti) in Constantinople and continued his activities in this city until 16 May 1919.[31] Along the established lines of the partitioning of the Ottoman Empire, the Allies (British, Italian, French and Greek forces) occupied Anatolia. The occupation of Constantinople, which was followed by the occupation of ?zmir (the two largest Turkish cities in that period) sparked the establishment of the Turkish national movement and the Turkish War of Independence.[38]
Turkish War of Independence (1919–1922)
Main article: Turkish War of Independence
See also: Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's leadership of the independence war
TIME 24 March 1923. Atatürk, the title reads 'Where is a Turk his own master?'

Fahri Yaver-i Hazret-i ?ehriyari ("Honorary Aide-de-camp to His Majesty Sultan") Mirliva Mustafa Kemal Pasha was assigned as the inspector of the Ninth Army Troops Inspectorate to reorganize what remained of the Ottoman military units and to improve internal security on April 30, 1919.[39] On 19 May 1919, he reached Samsun. His first goal was the establishment of an organized national resistance movement against the occupying forces. In June 1919, he issued the Amasya Circular, declaring the independence of the country was in danger. He resigned from the Ottoman Army on 8 July and the Ottoman government issued a warrant for his arrest. Later, he was condemned to death.

The last election to the Ottoman parliament held in December 1919 gave a sweeping majority to candidates of the "Association for Defense of Rights for Anatolia and Roumelia (Anadolu ve Rumeli Müdafaa-i Hukuk Cemiyeti)", headed by Mustafa Kemal, who himself remained in Ankara. The fourth (and last) term of the Parliament opened in Constantinople on 12 January 1920. It was dissolved by British forces on 18 March 1920, shortly after it adopted the Misak-? Milli ("National Pact"). Mustafa Kemal called for a national election to establish a new Turkish Parliament seated in Ankara[40] - the "Grand National Assembly" (GNA). On 23 April 1920, the GNA opened with Mustafa Kemal as the speaker; this act effectively created the situation of diarchy in the country.

On 10 August 1920, the Ottoman Grand Vizier Damat Ferid Pasha signed the Treaty of Sèvres, finalizing plans for the partitioning of the Ottoman Empire, including the regions that Turkish nationals viewed as their heartland. Mustafa Kemal insisted on the country's complete independence and the safeguarding of interests of the Turkish majority on "Turkish soil". He persuaded the GNA to gather a National Army. The GNA Army faced the Caliphate army propped up by the Allied occupation forces and had the immediate task of fighting the Armenians forces in the North-East and the Greeks who advanced eastward from Smyrna (modern day Izmir) that they had occupied in May 1919.

The GNA military successes against the Democratic Republic of Armenia in the autumn of 1920 and later against the Greeks were made possible[41] by a steady supply of gold and armaments to the kemalists from the Russian Bolshevik government from the autumn 1920 onwards.

After a series of battles during the Greco-Turkish war, the Greek army advanced as far as the Sakarya River, just eighty kilometers west of the GNA. On 5 August 1921, Mustafa Kemal was promoted to Commander in chief of the forces by the GNA.[42] The ensuing Battle of Sakarya was fought from 23 August to 13 September 1921 and ended with the defeat of the Greeks. After this victory, on September 19, 1921, Mustafa Kemal Pasha was given by the Grand National Assembly the rank of "Marshal" and the title of "Ghazi". The Allies, ignoring the extent of Kemal's successes, hoped to impose a modified version of the Treaty of Sèvres as a peace settlement on Ankara, but the proposal was rejected. In August 1922, Kemal launched an all-out attack on the Greek lines at Afyonkarahisar in the Battle of Dumlup?nar and Turkish forces regained control of Smyrna on 9 September 1922.[43] On 10 September 1922, Mustafa Kemal sent a telegram to the League of Nations saying that the Turkish population was so worked up that the Ankara Government would not be responsible for massacres.[44]
Establishment of the Republic of Turkey
See also: Treaty of Lausanne

The Conference of Lausanne began on 21 November 1922. Turkey, represented by ?smet ?nönü of the GNA, refused any proposal that would compromise Turkish sovereignty,[45] such as the control of Turkish finances, the Capitulations, the Straits and other issues. On 24 July 1923, the Treaty of Lausanne was signed by the Powers with the GNA, thus recognising the latter as the government of Turkey.

On 29 October 1923, the Republic of Turkey was proclaimed.
Presidency
For conceptual analysis, see Kemalist ideology and Atatürk's Reforms.
In 1930, leaving the parliament after the 7th-year celebration meeting. ?smet ?nönü, the second President of Turkey, is to the left.

With the establishment of the Republic of Turkey, efforts to modernise the country started. The new government analyzed the institutions and constitutions of Western states such as France, Sweden, Italy, and Switzerland and adapted them to the needs and characteristics of the Turkish nation. Highlighting the public's lack of knowledge regarding Kemal's intentions, the public cheered: "We are returning to the days of the first caliphs."[46] Mustafa Kemal placed Fevzi Çakmak, Kâz?m Özalp and ?smet ?nönü in political positions where they could institute his reforms. Mustafa Kemal capitalized on his reputation as an efficient military leader and spent the following years, up until his death in 1938, instituting political, economic, and social reforms. In doing so, he transformed Turkish society from perceiving itself as a Muslim part of a vast Empire into a modern, democratic, and secular nation-state.
Domestic policies

Kemal's basic tenet was the complete independence of the country.[47] He clarified his position:
“ ...by complete independence, we mean of course complete economic, financial, juridical, military, cultural independence and freedom in all matters. Being deprived of independence in any of these is equivalent to the nation and country being deprived of all its independence.[48] ”

He led wide-ranging reforms in social, cultural, and economical aspects, establishing the new Republic's backbone of legislative, judicial, and economic structures.

Mustafa Kemal created a banner to mark the changes between the old Ottoman and the new republican rule. Each change was symbolized as an arrow in this banner. This defining ideology of the Republic of Turkey is referred to as the "Six Arrows", or Kemalist ideology. Kemalist ideology is based on Mustafa Kemal's conception of realism and pragmatism.[49] The fundamentals of nationalism, populism and etatism were all defined under the Six Arrows. These fundamentals were not new in world politics or, indeed, among the elite of Turkey. What made them unique was that these interrelated fundamentals were formulated specifically for Turkey's needs. A good example is the definition and application of secularism; the Kemalist secular state significantly differed from predominantly Christian states.
Emergence of the state, 1923–1924
A political satire from the single-party period depicting Mustafa Kemal, the leader of the RPP, choosing the party's candidates for prospective MPs, to be elected in the incoming parliamentary elections. During the single-party state, the candidates had only one party's (RPP) list to join.

Mustafa Kemal's private journal entries dated before the establishment of the republic in 1923 show that he believed in the importance of the sovereignty of the people. In forging the new republic, the Turkish revolutionaries turned their back on the perceived corruption and decadence of cosmopolitan Constantinople and its Ottoman heritage.[50] For instance, they made Ankara the country's new capital. A provincial town deep in Anatolia, it was turned into the center of the independence movement. Atatürk wanted a "direct government by the Assembly"[51] and visualized a representative democracy, parliamentary sovereignty, where the National Parliament would be the ultimate source of power.[51]

In the following years, he altered his stance somewhat; the country needed an immense amount of reconstruction, and that "direct government by the Assembly" could not survive in such an environment. The revolutionaries faced challenges from the supporters of the old Ottoman regime, and also from the supporters of newer ideologies such as communism and fascism. Mustafa Kemal saw the consequences of fascist and communist doctrines in the 1920s and 1930s and rejected both.[52] He prevented the spread into Turkey of the totalitarian party rule which held sway in the Soviet Union, Germany and Italy.[53] Some perceived his opposition and silencing of these ideologies as a means of eliminating competition; others believed it was necessary to protect the young Turkish state from succumbing to the instability of new ideologies and competing factions.[citation needed]

The heart of the new republic was the GNA, established during the Turkish War of Independence by Mustafa Kemal.[54] The elections were free and used an egalitarian electoral system that was based on a general ballot.[54] Deputies at the GNA served as the voice of Turkish society by expressing its political views and preferences. It had the right to select and control both the government and the Prime Minister. Initially, it also acted as a legislative power, controlling the executive branch and, if necessary, acted as an organ of scrutiny under the Turkish Constitution of 1921.[54] The Turkish Constitution of 1924 set a loose separation of powers between the legislative and the executive organs of the state, whereas the separation of these two within the judiciary system was a strict one. Mustafa Kemal, then the President, occupied a powerful position in this political system.

The single-party regime was established de facto in 1925 after the adoption of the 1924 constitution. The only political party of the GNA was the "Peoples Party", founded by Mustafa Kemal in the initial years of the independence war. On 9 September 1923 it was renamed the Republican People's Party (Turkish Cumhuriyeti Halk Partis?).
Civic independence and the Caliphate, 1924–1925
In 1924, during his speech in Bursa.

Abolition of the Caliphate was an important dimension in Mustafa Kemal's drive to reform the political system and to promote the national sovereignty. By the consensus of the Muslim majority in early centuries, the caliphate was the core political concept of Sunni Islam.[55] Abolishing the sultanate was easier because the survival of the Caliphate at the time satisfied the partisans of the sultanate. This produced a split system with the new republic on one side and an Islamic form of government with the Caliph on the other side, and Kemal and ?nönü worried that "it nourished the expectations that the sovereign would return under the guise of Caliph.[56]" Caliph Abdülmecid II was elected after the abolishment of the sultanate (1922).

The caliph had his own personal treasury and also had a personal service that included military personnel; Mustafa Kemal said that there was no "religious" or "political" justification for this. He believed that Caliph Abdülmecid II was following in the steps of the sultans in domestic and foreign affairs: accepting of and responding to foreign representatives and reserve officers, and participating in official ceremonies and celebrations.[57] He wanted to integrate the powers of the caliphate into the powers of the GNA. His initial activities began on 1 January 1924, when [57] ?nönü, Çakmak and Özalp consented to the abolition of the caliphate. The caliph made a statement to the effect that he would not interfere with political affairs.[58] On 1 March 1924, at the Assembly, Mustafa Kemal said
“ The religion of Islam will be elevated if it will cease to be a political instrument, as had been the case in the past.[59] ”

On 3 March 1924, the caliphate was officially abolished and its powers within Turkey were transferred to the GNA. Other Muslim nations debated the validity of Turkey's unilateral abolition of the caliphate as they decided whether they should confirm the Turkish action or appoint a new caliph.[58] A "Caliphate Conference" was held in Cairo in May 1926 and a resolution was passed declaring the caliphate "a necessity in Islam", but failed to implement this decision.[58]

Two other Islamic conferences were held in Mecca (1926) and Jerusalem (1931), but failed to reach a consensus.[58] Turkey did not accept the re-establishment of the caliphate and perceived it as an attack to its basic existence; while Mustafa Kemal and the reformists continued their own way.[60]

The removal of the caliphate was followed by an extensive effort to establish the separation of governmental and religious affairs. Education was the cornerstone in this effort. In 1923, there were three main educational groups of institutions. The most common institutions were medreses based on Arabic, the Qur'an and memorization. The second type of institution was idadî and sultanî, the reformist schools of the Tanzimat era. The last group included colleges and minority schools in foreign languages that used the latest teaching models in educating pupils. The old medrese education was modernized.[61] Mustafa Kemal changed the classical Islamic education for a vigorously promoted reconstruction of educational institutions.[61] Kemal linked educational reform to the liberation of the nation from dogma, which he believed was more important than the Turkish war of independence.
“ Today, our most important and most productive task is the national education [unification and modernization] affairs. We have to be successful in national education affairs and we shall be. The liberation of a nation is only achieved through this way."[62] ”

In the summer of 1924, Mustafa Kemal invited American educational reformer John Dewey to Anakara to advise him on how to reform Turkish education.[61] His public education reforms aimed to prepare citizens for roles in public life through increasing the public literacy. He wanted to institute compulsory primary education for both girls and boys; since then this effort has been an ongoing task for the republic. He pointed out that one of the main targets of education in Turkey had to be raising a generation nourished with what he called the "public culture". The state schools established a common curriculum which became known as the "unification of education."

Unification of education was put into force on 3 March 1924 by the Law on Unification of Education (No. 430). With the new law, education became inclusive, organized on a model of the civil community. In this new design, all schools submitted their curriculum to the "Ministry of National Education", a government agency modelled after other countries' ministries of education. Concurrently, the republic abolished the two ministries and made clergy subordinate to the department of religious affairs, one of the foundations of secularism in Turkey. The unification of education under one curriculum ended "clerics or clergy of the Ottoman Empire", but was not the end of religious schools in Turkey; they were moved to higher education until later governments restored them to their former position in secondary education after Mustafa Kemal's death.
Atatürk with his Panama hat just after the Kastamonu speech in 1925.

Beginning in the fall of 1925, Mustafa Kemal encouraged the Turks to wear modern European attire.[63] He was determined to force the abandonment of the sartorial traditions of the Middle East and finalize a series of dress reforms, which were originally started by Mahmud II.[63] The fez was established by Sultan Mahmud II in 1826 as part of the Ottoman Empire's modernization effort. The Hat Law of 1925 introduced the use of Western-style hats instead of the fez. Mustafa Kemal first made the hat compulsory to civil servants.[63] The guidelines for the proper dressing of students and state employees were passed during his lifetime; many civil servants adopted the hat willingly. In 1925, Mustafa Kemal wore his "Panama hat" during a public appearance in Kastamonu, one of the most conservative towns in Anatolia, to explain that the hat was the headgear of civilized nations. The last part of reform on dress emphasized the need to wear modern Western suits with neckties as well as Fedora and Derby-style hats instead of antiquated religion-based clothing such as the veil and turban in the Law Relating to Prohibited Garments of 1934.

Even though he personally promoted modern dress for women, Mustafa Kemal never made specific reference to women’s clothing in the law, as he believed that women would adapt to the new clothing styles of their own free will. He was frequently photographed on public business with his wife Lâtife U?akl?gil, who covered her head in accordance with Islamic tradition. He was also frequently photographed on public business with women wearing modern Western clothes. But it was Atatürk's adopted daughters, Sabiha Gökçen and Afet ?nan, who provided the real role model for the Turkish women of the future. He wrote: "The religious covering of women will not cause difficulty ... This simple style [of headcovering] is not in conflict with the morals and manners of our society."[64]
In 1923, with members of the Mevlana order before its institutional expression became illegal and their dervish lodge changed into the Mevlana Museum. The Mevlevi order managed to transform itself into a nonpolitical organization which still exists.

On 30 August 1925, Mustafa Kemal's view on religious insignia used outside places of worship was introduced in his Kastamonu speech. This speech also had another position. He said:
“ In the face of knowledge, science, and of the whole extent of radiant civilization, I cannot accept the presence in Turkey's civilized community of people primitive enough to seek material and spiritual benefits in the guidance of sheiks. The Turkish republic cannot be a country of sheiks, dervishes, and disciples. The best, the truest order is the order of civilization. To be a man it is enough to carry out the requirements of civilization. The leaders of dervish orders will understand the truth of my words, and will themselves close down their lodges [tekke] and admit that their disciplines have grown up.[47] ”

On 2 September the government issued a decree closing down all Sufi orders and the tekkes. Mustafa Kemal ordered their dervish lodges to be converted to museums, such as Mevlana Museum in Konya. The institutional expression of Sufism became illegal in Turkey; a politically neutral form of Sufism, functioning as social associations, was permitted to exist.[citation needed]

The abolition of the caliphate and other cultural reforms were met with fierce opposition. The conservative elements were not happy and they launched attacks on the Kemalist reformists.[58]
Opposition to Kemal in 1924–1927
Mustaf Kemal Anatolian tours.ogg
Play video
Atatürk during one of his Anatolian tours.

In 1924, while the "Issue of Mosul" was on the table, Sheikh Said Piran began to organize the Sheikh Said Rebellion. Sheikh Said Piran was a wealthy Kurdish Tribal chief of a local Naqshbandi order. Piran emphasized the issue of religion; he not only opposed the abolition of the Caliphate, but also the adoption of civil codes based on Western models, the closure of religious orders, the ban on polygamy, and the new obligatory civil marriage. Piran stirred up his followers against the policies of the government, which he considered anti-Islamic. In an effort to restore Islamic law, Piran's forces moved through the countryside, seized government offices and marched on the important cities of Elaz?? and Diyarbak?r.[65] Members of the government saw the Sheikh Said Rebellion as an attempt at a counter-revolution. They urged immediate military action to prevent its spread. The "Law for the Maintenance of Public Order" was passed to deal with the rebellion on 4 March 1925. It gave the government exceptional powers and included the authority to shut down subversive groups, but was repealed on 4 March 1929.

There were also parliamentarians in the GNA who were not happy with these changes. So many members were denounced as opposition sympathizers at a private meeting of the Republican People's Party (CHP) that Mustafa Kemal expressed his fear of being among the minority in his own party.[66] He decided not to purge this group.[66] After a censure motion gave the chance to have a breakaway group, Kaz?m Karabekir, along with his friends, established such a group on 17 October 1924. The censure became a confidence vote at the CHP for Mustafa Kemal. On 8 November, the motion was rejected by 148 votes to 18, and 41 votes were absent.[66] CHP held all but one seat in the parliament. After the majority of the CHP chose him[66] Mustafa Kemal said, "the Turkish nation is firmly determined to advance fearlessly on the path of the republic, civilization and progress".[66]

On 17 November 1924, the breakaway group established the Progressive Republican Party (PRP) with 29 deputies and the first multi-party system began. The PRP's economic program suggested liberalism, in contrast to the state socialism of CHP, and its social program was based on conservatism in contrast to the modernism of CHP. Leaders of the party strongly supported the Kemalist revolution in principle, but had different opinions on the cultural revolution and the principle of secularism.[67] The RPR was not against Mustafa Kemal's main positions as declared in its program; they supported establishing secularism in the country and the civic law, or as stated, "the needs of the age" (article 3) and the uniform system of education (article 49).[66] These principles were set by the leaders at the onset. The only legal opposition became a home for all kinds of differing views.

During 1926, a plot to assassinate Mustafa Kemal was uncovered in ?zmir. It originated with a former deputy who had opposed the abolition of the Caliphate. Investigation shifted from an inquiry into the planners to an investigation ostensibly to uncover subversive activities but in truth used to undermine those disagreeing with Kemal's cultural revolution. The sweeping investigation brought a number of political activists before the tribunal, including Karabekir, the leader of PRP. A number of surviving leaders of the Committee of Union and Progress, who were at best second-rank in the Turkish movement, including Cavid, Ahmed ?ükrü, and Ismail Canbulat, were found guilty of treason and hanged.[68] The investigations found a link between the members of the PRP and the Sheikh Said Rebellion. The PRP was dissolved following the outcomes of the trial. The pattern of organized opposition, however, was broken. This action was the only broad political purge during Atatürk's presidency. Mustafa Kemal's saying, "My mortal body will turn into dust, but the Republic of Turkey will last forever," was regarded as a will after the assassination attempt.[69]
Modernization efforts, 1926–1930

In the years following 1926, Mustafa Kemal introduced a radical departure from previous reformations established by the Ottoman Empire.[70] For the first time in history, Islamic law was separated from secular law, and restricted to matters of religion.[70] Mustafa Kemal said
“ We must liberate our concepts of justice, our laws and our legal institutions from the bonds which, even though they are incompatible with the needs of our century, still hold a tight grip on us.[71] ”

On 1 March 1926, the Turkish penal code was passed. It was modelled after the Italian Penal Code. On 4 October 1926, Islamic courts were closed. Establishing the civic law needed time, so Kemal delayed the inclusion of the principle of laïcité until 5 February 1937.

Ottoman practice discouraged social interaction between men and women in keeping with Islamic practice of sex segregation. Mustafa Kemal began developing social reforms very early, as was evident in his personal journal. He and his staff discussed issues like abolishing the veiling of women and the integration of women into the outside world. The clue on how he was planning to tackle the issue was stated in his journal on November 1915;
“ The social change can come by (1) educating capable mothers who are knowledgeable about life; (2) giving freedom to women; (3) a man can change his morals, thoughts, and feelings by leading a common life with a woman; as there is an inborn tendency towards the attraction of mutual affection.[72] ”
President Kemal at the 1927 opening of the State Art and Sculpture Museum.

Mustafa Kemal needed a new civil code to establish his second major step of giving freedom to women. The first part was the education of girls and was established with the unification of education. On 4 October 1926, the new Turkish civil code passed. It was modelled after the Swiss Civil Code. Under the new code, women gained equality with men in such matters as inheritance and divorce. Mustafa Kemal did not consider gender a factor in social organization. According to his view, society marched towards its goal with men and women united. He believed that it was scientifically impossible for him to achieve progress and to become civilized if the gender separation continued as in Ottoman times.[73] During a meeting he declaimed:
“ To the women: Win for us the battle of education and you will do yet more for your country than we have been able to do. It is to you that I appeal.
To the men: If henceforward the women do not share in the social life of the nation, we shall never attain to our full development. We shall remain irremediably backward, incapable of treating on equal terms with the civilizations of the West.[74] ”

In 1927, the State Art and Sculpture Museum (Turkish: Ankara Resim ve Heykel Müzesi) opened its doors. The museum highlighted sculpture, which was little practised in Turkey owing to the Islamic tradition of avoiding idolatry. Kemal believed that "culture is the foundation of the Turkish Republic."[75] and described modern Turkey's ideological thrust as "a creation of patriotism blended with a lofty humanist ideal." He included both his own nation's creative legacy and what he saw as the admirable values of global civilization. The pre-Islamic culture of the Turks became the subject of extensive research, and particular emphasis was laid upon Turkish culture widespread before the Seljuk and Ottoman civilizations. He instigated study of Anatolian civilizations--Phrygians and Lydians, Sumerians and Hittites. To attract current public attention to past cultures, he personally named the "Sümerbank" (1932) after the Sumerians, and the "Etibank" (1935) after the Hittites. He also stressed the folk arts of the countryside as a wellspring of Turkish creativity.
President Gazi Mustafa Kemal introducing the new Turkish alphabet to the people of Kayseri (20 September 1928.)

In the spring of 1928, Mustafa Kemal met in Anakara with several linguists and professors from all over Turkey where he unveiled to them a plan of his to implement a new alphabet for the written Turkish language based on a modified Latin alphabet. The new Turkish alphabet would serve as a replacement for the old Arabic script and as a solution to the literacy problem in Turkey. When he asked how long it would take to implement the new alphabet into the Turkish language, most of the professors and linguists said between three to five years. Kemal was said to have scoffed and openly stated, "we shall do it in three to five months".

Over the next several months, Mustafa Kemal pressed for the introduction of the new Turkish alphabet as well as made public announcements to the upcoming overhaul of the new alphabet. On 1 November 1928, Mustafa Kemal introduced the new Turkish alphabet and abolished the use of Arabic script. At the time, literate citizens of the country comprised as little as 10% of the population. Dewey noted to Kemal that learning how to read and write in Turkish with the Arabic script took roughly three years with rather strenuous methods at the elementary level.[61] They used the Ottoman Language written in the Arabic script with Arabic and Persian loan vocabulary.[61] The creation of the new Turkish alphabet as a variant of the Latin alphabet was undertaken by the Language Commission (Turkish: Dil Encümeni) with the initiative of Mustafa Kemal.[61] The tutelage was received from an Ottoman-Armenian calligrapher.[76] The first Turkish newspaper using the new alphabet was published on 15 December 1928. Kemal himself travelled the countryside in order to teach citizens the new alphabet. The country's adaptation to the new alphabet was very quick, and literacy in Turkey jumped from 10% to over 70% within two years. Beginning in 1932, the People's Houses (Turkish: Halk Evleri) opened throughout the country in order to meet the requirement that people between the ages of four and 40 were required to learn the new alphabet as mandated. There were congresses for discussing the issues of copyright, public education and scientific publishing. Literacy reform was also supported by strengthening the private publishing sector with a new law on copyrights.

Mustafa Kemal promoted modern teaching methods at the primary education level, and Dewey took a place of honour.[61] Dewey presented a paradigmatic set of recommendations designed for developing societies that are moving towards modernity in his "Report and Recommendation for the Turkish educational system."[61] He was interested in adult education for the goal of forming a skill base in the country. Turkish women were taught not only child care, dress-making and household management, but also skills needed to join the economy outside the home. Turkish education became a state-supervised system, which was designed to create a skill base for the social and economic progress of the country.[77] His "unified" education program was designed to educate responsible citizens as well as useful and appreciated members of society.[61] Turkish education became an integrative system, aimed to alleviate poverty and used female education to establish gender equality.

Mustafa Kemal generated media attention to propagate modern education during this period. He instigated official education meetings called "Science Boards" and "Education Summits." to discuss the quality of education, training issues and certain basic educational principles. He said, "our schools [curriculum] should aim to provide opportunities for all pupils to learn and to achieve." He was personally engaged with the development of two textbooks. The first one was Turkish: Vatanda? ?çin Medeni Bilgiler (1930). The second, Geometry (1937), was a text for high schools. The Vatanda? ?çin Medeni Bilgiler (Civic knowledge for the citizens) introduced the science of comparative government and explained the means of administering public trust by explaining the rules of governance as applied to the new state institutions.
Opposition to Kemal in 1930–1931
Mustafa Kemal with the Liberal Republican Party leader Ali Fethi Okyar and his daughter in Yalova, on 13 August 1930.

On 11 August 1930, Mustafa Kemal decided to try a multiparty movement once again and asked Ali Fethi Okyar to establish a new party. He insisted on the protection of secular reforms. The brand-new Liberal Republican Party succeeded all around the country. Without the establishment of a real political spectrum, once again, the party became the center to opposition of Atatürk's reforms, particularly in regard to the role of religion in public life.

On 23 December 1930, a chain of violent incidents occurred, starting with the rebellion of Islamic fundamentalists in Menemen, a small town in the Aegean region. This so-called Menemen Incident was considered a serious threat against secular reforms.

In November 1930, Ali Fethi Okyar dissolved his own party. A more lasting multi-party period of the Republic of Turkey began in 1945. In 1950, the RPP released the majority position to the Democratic Party. There are arguments that Kemal's single party rule did not promote direct democracy. The experiments with pluralism failed during this period was that not all groups in the country had agreed to a minimal consensus regarding shared values (mainly secularism) and shared rules for conflict resolution. In response to such criticisms, Mustafa Kemal's biographer Andrew Mango said: "between the two wars, democracy could not be sustained in many relatively richer and better-educated societies. Atatürk's enlightened authoritarianism left a reasonable space for free private lives. More could not have been expected in his lifetime."[78] Even though, at times, he did not appear to be a democrat in his actions, he always supported the idea of building a civil society: a system of voluntary civic and social organizations and institutions as opposed to the force-backed structures of the state. In one of his many speeches about the importance of democracy, Mustafa Kemal said in 1933:
“ Republic means the democratic administration of the state. We founded the Republic, reaching its tenth year. It should enforce all the requirements of democracy as the time comes.[79] ”
Modernization efforts, 1931–1938
In 1931, during the establishment ceremony of the Turkish History Institution.

In 1931, Mustafa Kemal established the Turkish Language Association for conducting research works in the Turkish language (Turkish: Türk Dil Kurumu). The Turkish Historical Society (Turkish: Türk Tarih Kurumu) was established in 1931, and began maintaining archives in 1932 for conducting research works on the history of Turkey.[80] On 1 January 1928, he established the Turkish Education Association.[80] The Association supported intelligent and hard-working children in financial need, as well as making material and scientific contributions to the educational life.
Atatürk visits the Istanbul University after its reorganization, 1933.

In 1933, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk ordered the reorganization of Istanbul University into a modern institution and later established Ankara University in the capital city.[81]

Mustafa Kemal dealt with the translation of scientific terminology into Turkish.[82] He wanted the Turkish language reform to be methodologically based. Any attempt to "cleanse" the Turkish language of foreign influence without modelling the integral structure of the language was inherently wrong to him. He personally oversaw the development of the Sun Language Theory (Turkish: Güne? Dil Teorisi), which was a linguistic theory which proposed that all human languages were descendants of one Central Asian primal language. His interest started with the works by the French scientist Hilaire de Barenton entitled L'Origine des Langues, des Religions et des Peuples, which postulates that all languages originated from hieroglyphs and cuneiform used by Sumerians,[83] and the paper of Austrian linguist Dr. Hermann F. Kvergi? of Vienna entitled "La psychologie de quelques elements des langues Turques" ("the psychology of some elements of the Turkic Languages").[84] He introduced the Sun Language Theory into Turkish political and educational circles in 1935, although he did later correct the more extremist practices.[82]
Atatürk at the library of the Çankaya Presidential Residence in Ankara, on 16 July 1929.

Beginning in 1932, several hundred "People's Houses" (Turkish: Halk Evi) and "People's Rooms" (Halk Odas?) across the country allowed greater access to a wide variety of artistic activities, sports, and other cultural events. Atatürk supported and encouraged the visual and the plastic arts, which had been suppressed by the Ottoman leaders, who regarded depiction of the human form as idolatry. Many museums opened, architecture began to follow modern trends, and classical Western music, opera, and ballet, as well as the theatre, also took greater hold. Book and magazine publications increased as well, and the film industry began to grow.
The original 1935 print of the first Quran in Turkish language, ordered by Atatürk.

In 1932, a Qur'an in the Turkish language was read before a live audience and broadcast over the radio.[85] That same year, Mustafa Kemal wanted to "teach religion in Turkish to Turkish people who had been practising Islam without understanding it for centuries"[86] All Qur'ans at the time were printed in Old Arabic. There was a rare polyglot Qu'ran written in Arabic, Persian, Turkish and Latin in the tetrapla style, prepared by savant Andrea Acolutho of Bernstadt and printed at Berlin in 1701.[87] In 1924, three Turkish translations published in Istanbul created controversy. Several renderings of the Qur'an in the Turkish language were read in front of the public.[85] These Turkish Qur'ans were fiercely opposed by religious people. This incident impelled many leading Muslim modernists to call upon the Turkish Parliament to sponsor a Qur'an translation of suitable quality.[88] With the support of Mustafa Kemal, the Parliament approved the project and the Directorate of Religious Affairs enlisted, Mehmet Akif (Ersoy), to compose a Qur'an translation and a Islamic scholar Elmal?l? Hamdi Yaz?r to author a Turkish language Qur'anic commentary (tafsir) titled "Hak Dini Kur'an Dili." It was only in 1935 that the version read in public found its way to print.[89] Mustafa Kemal believed that the understanding of religion was too important to be left to a small group of people.[86] This included the central religious text of Islam. Mustafa Kemal's objective was to make the Qu'ran accessible to modern people, and therefore to translate it into modern languages.[86]

In 1934, Mustafa Kemal commissioned the first Turkish operatic work, Özsoy. The opera, which was staged at the People's House in Ankara, was composed by Adnan Saygun and performed by soprano Semiha Berksoy.[90]
Eighteen female MPs joined the Turkish Parliament with the 1935 general elections.

On 5 December 1934, Turkey moved to grant full political rights to women, before several other European nations. The equal rights of women in marriage had already been established in the earlier Turkish civil code.[91] Women's place in Mustafa Kemal's cultural reforms was best expressed in the civic book prepared under his supervision.[92] Mustafa Kemal said that
“ There is no logical explanation for the political disenfranchisement of women. Any hesitation and negative mentality on this subject is nothing more than a fading social phenomenon of the past. ...Women must have the right to vote and to be elected; because democracy dictates that, because there are interests that women must defend, and because there are social duties that women must perform.[93] ”

Change came slowly; in the 1935 elections there were only 18 female MPs out of a total of 395 representatives.
Foreign policies

Atatürk's foreign policy followed his motto, "peace at home and peace in the world."[94] a perception of peace linked to his project of civilization and modernization.[95] The outcomes of Kemal's policies depended on the power of the parliamentary sovereignty established by the Republic.[96] The Turkish War of Independence was the last time Atatürk used his military might in dealing with other countries. Foreign issues were resolved by peaceful methods during his presidency.
Issue of Mosul
During the visit of Abdullah I of Jordan.

The "Issue of Mosul", a dispute with the United Kingdom over control of Mosul Province, was one of the first foreign affairs-related controversies of the new Republic. During the Mesopotamian campaign, General Marshall followed the British War Office's instruction that "every effort was to be made to score as heavily as possible on the Tigris before the whistle blew", capturing Mosul three days after the signature of the Armistice of Mudros (30 October 1918).[97] In 1920, the Misak-? Milli, which consolidated the "Turkish lands", declared that Mosul Province was a part of the historic Turkish heartland. The British were in a precarious situation with the Issue of Mosul, and were adopting almost equally desperate measures to protect their interests. The Iraqi revolt against the British was put down by the RAF Iraq Command during the summer of 1920. From the British perspective, if Mustafa Kemal Atatürk stabilized Turkey, he would then turn his attention to Mosul and penetrate Mesopotamia, where the native population would probably join him thus bringing an insurgent and hostile Muslim nation to the very gates of India.

In 1923, Mustafa Kemal tried to persuade the GNA that accepting the arbitration of the League of Nations at the Treaty of Lausanne over Mosul did not mean relinquishing Mosul, but rather waiting for a time when Turkey might be stronger. The artificially drawn border had an unsettling effect on both sides of the population. Later, it was claimed that Turkey began where the oil ends as the border was drawn by the British geophysicists based on the oil reserves. Atatürk did not want this separation.[98] The British Foreign Secretary attempted to disclaim any existence of oil in the Mosul area. On 23 January 1923, Lord Curzon argued that the existence of oil was no more than hypothetical.[97] However, according to Armstrong, "England wanted oil. Mosul and Kurds were the key."[99]

While three inspectors from the League of Nations Committee were sent to the region to oversee the situation in 1924, the Sheikh Said rebellion, beginning in 1924 and escalating until 1927, set out to establish a new government positioned to cut Turkey's link to Mesopotamia. The relationship between the rebels and Britain was questioned. British assistance was sought after the rebels realised that the rebellion, or its expected outcome, could not stand by itself.[100]

In 1925, the League of Nations formed a three-member committee to study the case while the Sheikh Said Rebellion was on the rise. Partly because of the continuing uncertainties along the northern frontier (present-day northern Iraq), the committee recommended that the region should be connected to Iraq with the condition that the UK would hold the British Mandate of Mesopotamia. By the end of March 1925, the necessary troop movements were completed, and the whole area of the Sheikh Said rebellion was encircled.[101] As a result of these manoeuvres, the revolt was put down. Britain, Iraq and Kemal made a treaty on 5 June 1926, which mostly followed the decisions of the League Council. In 1926, Kemal faced growing opposition to his reform policies, a continuing precarious economic situation, and a defeat in the Mosul issue. A large section of the Kurdish population and the Iraqi Turkmen were left on the other side of the border. The Sheikh Said Rebellion hastened both the imposition of the Republican Party and the speed of Atatürk's reforms. In 1925, the population was largely illiterate and disparate. Turkey was in ruins, reconstruction was difficult, poverty was everywhere and people were in pain, which fed separatist violence.[102] Mustafa Kemal attributed the rebellion to certain notables rather than a section of the population, who had been found guilty by the courts (kanunen mucrim olan bazi muteneffizan) and who used the mask of religion to conceal the interests of landlords, feudal tribal leaders and other "reactionaries" on 7 March 1925.[103]
Relations with the RSFSR/Soviet Union
See also: Russia–Turkey relations#Turkey and the Soviet Union
During a reception at the USSR Embassy in Ankara, on 7 November 1927.

In his message to Vladimir Lenin, Russian bolsheviks' leader and head of the RSFSR's government, dated 26 April 1920, Kemal promised to coordinate his military operations with the bolsheviks' "fight against imperialist governments" and requested 5 million lira in gold as well as armaments "as first aid" to his forces.[104] In 1920 alone, the Lenin government supplied the kemalists with 6,000 rifles, over 5 million rifle cartridges, 17,600 projectiles as well as 200.6 kg of gold bullion; in the subsequent 2 years the amount of aid increased.[105]

In March 1921, the GNA representatives in Moscow signed the "Friendship and Brotherhood" Treaty with Soviet Russia, which was a major diplomatic breakthrough for the kemalists. The Treaty of Moscow, followed by the identical Treaty of Kars in October the same year, gave Turkey a favourable settlement of its north-eastern frontier at the expense the Armenian Soviet Socialist Republic, then nominally an independent state.

The two country's relations were friendly but were based on the fact that they were fighting against a common enemy: Britain and the West.[106] In 1920, Kemal toyed with the idea to use a state-controlled Turkish Communist Party to forestall the perceived spread of communist ideas in the country and gain access to the Comintern's financing;[107] nevertheless, the entire Turkish communist leadership were assassinated on 28 January 1921 at Kemal's behest.[108]

"Friendship with Russia," said Mustafa Kemal, "is not to adopt their ideology of communism for Turkey."[106] He declared: "Communism is a social issue. Social conditions, religion, and national traditions of our country confirm the opinion that Russian Communism is not applicable in Turkey."[109] In a 1 November 1924 speech he said: "Our amicable relations with our old friend the Soviet Russian Republic are developing and progressing every day. As in past our Republican Government regards genuine and extensive good relations with Soviet Russia as the Keynote of our foreign policy."[106]

After the Turks, on 16 December 1925, withdrew their delegation from Geneva, thus leaving the League of Nations Council to grant a mandate for the Mosul region to Britain without their consent, Kemal countered[110] by concluding a non-aggression pact with the USSR on 17 December the same year.[111] In 1935, the pact was prolonged for another 10 years.[112]
Exchanges on the concept of a Balkan Federation during the visit of Voroshilov, a vision of Kemal's which was never achieved.

In 1933, the Soviet War minister Kliment Voroshilov visited Turkey and attended the tenth year celebrations of the Republic.[113] Kemal explained his position regarding the realization of his plan for a Balkan Federation economically uniting Turkey, Greece, Romania, Yugoslavia and Bulgaria.[113]

During the second half of the 1930s, Mustafa Kemal tried to establish a closer relationship with Britain and other major western powers, which caused displeasure on the part of the Soviets. The second edition of the Great Soviet Encyclopedia (Volume 20, 1953) was unequivocally critical of Kemal's policies in the last years of his rule, calling his domestic policies "anti-popular" and his foreign course as aimed at rapprochement with the "imperialist powers."[114]
Turkish-Greek alliance
Hosting the Greek Prime Minister Eleftherios Venizelos (at left) in October 1932.

The post-war leader of Greece, Eleftherios Venizelos, was also determined to establish normal relations between the two states. The war devastated Western Anatolia, and the financial burden of Ottoman Muslim refugees from Greece blocked rapprochement. Venizelos moved forward with the agreement despite accusations of conceding too much on the issues of the naval armaments, and the properties of the Ottoman Greeks from Turkey according to the Treaty of Lausanne.[115] Kemal resisted the pressures of historic enmities or atrocity-mongering between the societies. In spite of Turkish animosity against the Greeks, Kemal showed acute sensitivity to even the slightest allusion to these tensions; at one point, he ordered the removal of a painting showing a Turkish soldier plunging his bayonet to a Greek soldier by stating, "What a revolting scene!".[116]

Ultimately, many Greeks consider the reconciliation with Turkey among the greatest foreign policy achievements of Venizelos' final term as Prime Minister. Greece renounced all its claims over Turkish territory and the two sides concluded an agreement on 30 April 1930. On 25 October, Venizelos visited Turkey, and signed a treaty of friendship.[117] Venizelos even forwarded Atatürk's name for the 1934 Nobel Peace Prize,[118] Even after his fall from power, Greco-Turkish relations remained cordial. Indeed, Venizelos' successor Panagis Tsaldaris came to visit Atatürk in September 1933 and signed a more comprehensive agreement, called the Entente Cordiale, a stepping stone for the Balkan Pact.

Greek Premier Ioannis Metaxas said of Atatürk and the Turkish-Greek alliance, that "...Greece, which has the highest estimation of the renowned leader, heroic soldier, and enlightened creator of Turkey. We will never forget that President Atatürk was the true founder of the Turkish-Greek alliance based on a framework of common ideals and peaceful cooperation. He developed ties of friendship between the two nations which it would be unthinkable to dissolve. Greece will guard its fervent memories of this great man, who determined an unalterable future path for the noble Turkish nation."
Neighbours to the east
During the visit of Faisal I of Iraq in 1931.

From 1919, Afghanistan was in the midst of a reformation period under Amanullah Khan. Afghan Foreign Minister Mahmud Tarzi was a follower of Mustafa Kemal's domestic policy. He encouraged Amanullah Khan in social and political reform but urged that reforms should build upon the basis of a strong government. During the late 1920s, Anglo-Afghan relations soured over British fears of an Afghan-Soviet friendship. On 20 May 1928, Anglo-Afghan politics gained a positive perspective, when Amanullah Khan and the Queen were received by Mustafa Kemal in Constantinople. This meeting was followed by a Turkey-Afghanistan Friendship and Cooperation pact on 22 May 1928. Mustafa Kemal supported Afghanistan's integration into international organizations. In 1934, Afghanistan's relations with the international community gained a huge boost when it joined the League of Nations.[119] In 1937, King Zahir Shah became a signatory of the Treaty of Saadabad. Mahmud Tarzi received Mustafa Kemal's personal support until he died on 22 November 1933 in Istanbul.
During the visit of Reza Pahlavi I, The Shah of Iran.

Mustafa Kemal and Reza Shah had a common approach regarding British imperialism and its influence in their region, creating a slow but continuous rapprochement between Ankara and Tehran. Both governments sent diplomatic missions and messages of friendship to each other during the Turkish war of independence.[120] The policy of the Ankara government in this period was to give moral support in order to assure Iranian independence and territorial integrity.[121] The relations were strained after the abolishment of the Caliphate. Iran's Shi'a clergy did not accept Kemal's position. Iranian religious power centres perceived the real motive behind Atatürk's reforms was to undermine the power of the clergy.[121] An admirer of Mustafa Kemal and close student of his reforms, Reza Shah followed the same type of modernization efforts. By the mid-1930s, Reza Shah's efforts had upset the clergy throughout Iran, thus widening the gap between religion and government.[122] Mustafa Kemal feared the occupation and dismemberment of Iran as a multi-ethnic/multi-tribal society by Russia or Great Britain.[121] Like Mustafa Kemal, Reza Shah wanted to secure Iran's borders. Reza Shah visited him in 1934. In 1935, the draft of what would become the Treaty of Saadabad was paragraphed in Geneva, but the signing of it was delayed because of the border dispute between Iran and Iraq. Iran challenged the validity of both the Treaty of Erzerum and the Constantinople Protocol in 1934.

On 8 July 1937, Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Afghanistan signed the Saadabad Pact at Tehran. The signatories undertook to preserve their common frontiers, to consult together in all matters of common interest and to commit no aggression against one another’s territory. The treaty united the Afghan king’s call for greater Oriental-Middle Eastern cooperation, Reza Shah's goal in securing relations with Turkey that would help Iran free herself from Soviet and British influence, and Mustafa Kemal's foreign policy of securing stability in the region. The immediate outcome was to deter Mussolini from adventures in the region.[123]
Turkish Straits
During the visit of King Edward VIII.

On 24 July 1923, the Treaty of Lausanne included the Lausanne Straits Agreement. The Lausanne Straits Agreement stated that the Dardanelles should remain open to all commercial vessels: seizure of foreign military vessels was subject to certain limitations during peacetime, and, even as a neutral state, Turkey could not limit any military passage during wartime. The Lausanne Straits Agreement stated that the waterway was to be demilitarized, and its management left to the Straits Commission. The demilitarized zone heavily restricted Turkey's domination and sovereignty over the Straits. The defence of Constantinople was impossible without having the sovereignty over the water that passed through it.

In March 1936, Hitler's reoccupation of the Rhineland gave Mustafa Kemal the opportunity to resume full control over the Straits. "The situation in Europe", he declared "is highly appropriate for such a move. We shall certainly achieve it".[124] Tevfik Rü?tü Aras, who was the foreign minister, initiated a move to revise the Straits' regime. Aras claimed that he was directed by the President, rather than his Prime Minister, Ismet Inönü. In?nü was worried about harming relations with Britain, France, and Balkan neighbors over the Straits. However, the signatories agreed to join the conference, since unlimited military passage had become unfavourable to Turkey with the changes in world politics. Mustafa Kemal demanded that the members of the Turkish Foreign Office devise a solution that would transfer full control over the waterway to Turkey.

On 20 July 1936, the Montreux Convention was signed, with the participation of Bulgaria, Great Britain, Australia, France, Japan, Romania, the Soviet Union, Turkey, Yugoslavia and Greece. It became the primary instrument governing the passage of commercial and war vessels through the Dardanelles Strait. It was ratified by the GNAT on 31 July 1936. It went into effect on 9 November 1936, and is still valid today.
Balkan Pact
During the visit of Alexander I of Yugoslavia in 1931.

Until the early 1930s, Turkey followed a modern neutral foreign policy with the West by developing joint friendship and neutrality agreements. These bilateral agreements were aligned with Mustafa Kemal's worldview. By the end of 1925, Turkey had signed fifteen joint agreements with Western states.

In the early 1930s, changes and developments in world politics required Turkey to make multilateral agreements to improve its security. Mustafa Kemal strongly believed that a close cooperation between the Balkan states based on the principle of equality would have an important effect on European politics. These states had been ruled by the Ottoman Empire for centuries, and had formed a powerful force. While the origins of the Balkan agreement may date back as far as 1925, the Balkan Pact came to being in the mid-1930s. Several important developments in the Balkan Peninsula and in Europe helped the original idea to materialize, such as improvements in the Turkish-Greek alliance and the rapprochement between Bulgaria and Yugoslavia.

The Balkan Pact was negotiated by Mustafa Kemal with Greece, Romania, and Yugoslavia. This mutual-defence agreement intended to guarantee the signatories' territorial integrity and political independence against attack by another Balkan state such as Bulgaria or Albania. It countered the increasingly aggressive foreign policy of fascist Italy and the effect of a potential Bulgarian alignment with Nazi Germany. He thought of the Balkan Pact as a medium of balance in the relations with the European countries.[125] Mustafa Kemal was particularly anxious to establish a region of security and alliances in the west of Turkey and in Balkan Europe, which would extend as far as Dobruja.[126]

The Balkan Pact provided for regular military and diplomatic consultations. It was regarded as a significant step forward in consolidating the free world's position in southeast Europe, although it contained no specific military commitments. The importance of the agreement was best displayed in the message which Atatürk sent to the Greek Premier, Ioannis Metaxas:
“ The borders of the allies in the Balkan Pact are a single border. Those who covet this border will encounter the burning beams of the sun. I recommend avoiding this. The forces that defend our borders are a single and inseparable force.[127] ”

It was signed by GNA on 28 Feb. The Greek and Yugoslav Parliaments ratified the agreement a few days after. The unanimously ratified Balkan pact became a reality on 18 May 1935 and lasted until 1940.

The Balkan Pact turned out to be ineffective for reasons that were beyond Atatürk’s control. What he wanted to prevent with the Balkan Pact was realized by Bulgaria’s attempt to put the Dobruja issue into the agenda after a series of international events ending with the Italian invasion of Albania on 7 April 1939. These conflicts spread rapidly, ending with World War II. The goal of Atatürk, to protect southeast Europe, failed with the dissolution of the pact. The only state which arose intact after the war was Atatürk's Republic of Turkey.
Issue of Hatay
Telegram sent by Atatürk after the local legislative assembly accepted his proposal for the Hatay State's flag.

Turkish Prime-Minister Ismet Inonu was very conscious of foreign policy issues. During the second half of the 1930s, Atatürk tried to form a closer relationship with Britain. The risks of this policy change put the two men at odds. The Hatay issue and the Lyon agreement were two important developments in foreign policy that played a significant role in the severing of relations between Atatürk and Ismet.

In 1936, Atatürk raised the "Issue of Hatay" at the League of Nations. Hatay was based on the old administrative unit of the Ottoman Empire called the Sanjak of Alexandretta. On behalf of the League of Nations, the representatives of France, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, Belgium and Turkey prepared a constitution for Hatay, which established it as an autonomous sanjak within Syria. Despite some inter-ethnic violence, in the midst of 1938 an election was conducted by the local legislative assembly. The cities of Antakya (Antioch) and ?skenderun (Alexandretta) joined Turkey in 1939.
Economic policies

For conceptual analysis, see Economic reforms

Mustafa Kemal instigated economic policies to develop small and large scale businesses, but also to create social strata (industrial bourgeoisie along with the peasantry of Anatolia) that were virtually non-existent during the Ottoman Empire. The primary problem faced by the politics of his period was the lag in the development of political institutions and social classes which would steer such social and economic changes.[128] Mustafa Kemal's vision regarding early Turkish economic policy was apparent during the ?zmir Economic Congress of 1923 which was established before the signing of the Lausanne Treaty. The initial choices of Mustafa Kemal's economic policies reflected the realities of his period. After World War I, due to the lack of any real potential investors to open private sector factories and develop industrial production, Kemal established many state-owned factories for agriculture, machinery, and textile industries.
State intervention, 1923–1929
Atatürk and Celâl Bayar visiting the Bursa plant, which was established as a part of the cotton-related industry.

Mustafa Kemal and ?smet ?nönü pursuit of state controlled economical policies was guided by a national vision; they wanted to knit the country together, eliminate the foreign control of the economy, and improve communications. Constantinople, a trading port with international foreign enterprises, was abandoned and resources were channelled to other, less developed cities, in order to establish a more balanced development throughout the country.[129]

For Mustafa Kemal, as for his supporters, tobacco remained wedded to his policy in the pursuit of economic independence. Turkish tobacco was an important industrial crop, while its cultivation and manufacture were French monopolies under capitulations of the Ottoman Empire. The tobacco and cigarette trade was controlled by two French companies: the "Regie Compagnie interessee des tabacs de l'empire Ottoman" and "Narquileh tobacco."[130] The Ottoman Empire gave the tobacco monopoly to the Ottoman Bank as a limited company under the "Council of the Public Debt". Regie, as part of the Council of the Public Debt, had control over production, storing, and distribution (including export) with an unchallenged price control. Consequently, Turkish farmers were dependent on the company for their livelihood.[131] In 1925, this company was taken over by the state and named "Tekel". The control of tobacco was the biggest achievement of the Kemalist political machinery's "nationalization" of the economy for a country that did not produce oil. They accompanied this achievement with the development of the cotton industry, which peaked during the early 1930s. Cotton was the second biggest industrial crop in Turkey.

In 1924, with the initiative of Mustafa Kemal, the first Turkish bank ?? Bankas? was established. He was the first member of ?? Bankas?. The bank's creation was a response to the growing need for a truly national establishment and the birth of a banking system which was capable of backing up economic activities, managing funds accumulated as a result of policies providing savings incentives and, where necessary, extending resources which could trigger industrial impetus.

In 1927, Turkish State Railways was established. Because Mustafa Kemal considered the development of a national rail network as another important step in industrialization, it was given high priority. This institution developed an extensive railway network in a very short time. In 1927, Kemal also ordered the integration of road construction goals into development plans. The road network consisted of 13,885 km of ruined surface roads, 4.450 km of stabilized roads, and 94 bridges. In 1935, a new entity was established under the government called "Sose ve Kopruler Reisligi" which would drive development of new roads after World War II. However, in 1937, the 22,000 km of roads in Turkey augmented the railways.

The national group[clarification needed], which had Kemal as the leader, developed many projects within the first decade of the republic. However, the Turkish economy was based on agriculture, with primitive tools and methods; roads and transportation facilities were far from sufficient and management of the economy was inefficient. The Great Depression brought many changes to this picture.
Great Depression, 1929–1931
Atatürk supported large-scale government subsidized industrial complexes, such as Sümerbank, increasingly after the Great Depression.

The young republic, like the rest of the world, found itself in a deep economic crisis during the Great Depression. Mustafa Kemal reacted to conditions of this period by moving toward integrated economic polices, and establishing a central bank to control exchange rates. However, Turkey could not finance essential imports; its currency was shunned and zealous revenue officials seized the meagre possessions of peasants who could not pay their taxes.[129]

In 1929, Mustafa Kemal signed a treaty that resulted in the restructuring of the nation's debt with the Ottoman Public Debt Administration. He did not fault the Ottoman debt. He had to deal with the turbulent economic issues of the Great Depression along with the payment of the high debt known as the Ottoman public debt. Until the early 1930s, Turkish private business could not acquire exchange credits. It was impossible to integrate the Turkish economy without a solution to this problem. This increased the credibility of the new Republic.

In 1931, Mustafa Kemal's intention to establish the Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey was realized. The bank's primary purpose was to have control over the exchange rate, and Ottoman Bank's role during its initial years as a central bank was phased out. Later specialized banks such as the Sümerbank (1932) and the Etibank (1935) were founded.

From the political economy perspective, Mustafa Kemal had to face the same problems which all countries faced: political upheaval. The establishment of a new party with a different economic perspective was needed; he asked Ali Fethi Okyar to fulfil. The Liberal Republican Party (August, 1930) came out with a liberal program and proposed that state monopolies should be ended, foreign capital should be attracted, and that state investment should be curtailed. Mustafa Kemal supported ?nönü's point of view: "it is impossible to attract foreign capital for essential development." In 1931, he proclaimed: "In the economic area ...the programme of the party is statism."[132] However, the effect of free republicans was felt strongly and state intervention became more moderate, more akin to a form of state capitalism. One of his radical left-wing supporters, Yakup Kadri Karaosmano?lu from the Kadro (The Cadre) movement, claimed that Mustafa Kemal found a third way between capitalism and socialism.[133]
Liberalization and planned growth, 1931–1939
Atatürk at the Etimesgut Airport in Ankara, built by the Turkish Aircraft Association. His famous quote, "the future is in the skies", is embossed today on the airport's façade.

The first (1929–1933) and second five year economic plans were performed under the supervision of Mustafa Kemal. The first five year economic plan promoted consumer substitution industries. However, these economic plans changed drastically with the death of Kemal and the rise of World War II. Subsequent governments took measures that harmed the economic productivity of Turkey in various ways.[134] The achievements of the 1930s were credited to early (1920s) implementation of the economic system based on the national policies of Mustafa Kemal and his team.[135]

In 1931, Mustafa Kemal watched the first national aircraft, MMV-1, develop. He realized the important role of aviation. In his words, "the future lies in the skies".[136] Turkish Aeronautical Association was founded in 16 February 1925 by his directive.[137] He ordered the establishment of the Turkish Aircraft Association Lottery. Instead of the traditional raffle prizes, this new lottery paid money prizes. The major part of its income was used to establish a new factory fund aviation projects. Mustafa Kemal did not see the flight of the first Turkish military aircraft built at the factory. Operational American Curtiss Hawk fighters were being produced soon after his death and before the onset of World War II.

In 1932, liberal economist Celal Bayar became the Minister of Economy at Mustafa Kemal's request and served until 1937.[138] During this period, the country moved toward a mixed economy with its first private initiatives. Textile, sugar, paper and steel factories (financed by a loan from Britain) were the private sectors of the period. Besides these government owned power plants, banks, and insurance companies were established.

In 1935, the first Turkish cotton print factory "Nazilli Calico print factory" opened. Cotton planting was promoted to furnish raw material for future factory settlements, part of the industrialization process.[139] Nazilli became a major center beginning with the establishment of cotton mills and was followed by a calico print factory by 1935.[140][141]

On 25 October 1937, Mustafa Kemal appointed Celal Bayar as the prime minister of the 9th government. Integrated economic policies reached their peak with the signing of the 1939 Treaty with Britain and France.[134] This signaled a turning point in Turkish history.[134] It was the first step towards an alliance with the "West".[134] Celal Bayar served as prime minister until Mustafa Kemal's death. The differences of opinion between Inönü (state control) and Celal Bayar (liberal) came to the forefront after ?nönü became president in 1938. On 25 January 1939, Prime Minister Bayar resigned.

Mustafa Kemal supported the establishment of the automobile industry. He wanted it to become a center in the region. The motto of the Turkish automobile association was: "The Turkish driver is a man of the most exquisite sensitivities."[142]

During 1935, Turkey was becoming an industrial society on the Western European model set out by Atatürk.[143] At the time of his death, most regions of Turkey had viable micro-economic stability and some macro economic stability. These signs of sound economic policies were marked by the first-ever emergence of local banks. However, the gap between Mustafa Kemal’s goals and the achievements of the socio-political structure of the country was not closed.[143]
Personal life
See also: Mustafa Kemal Atatürk's personal life
Mustafa Kemal (Atatürk) and his wife Lâtife U?akl?gil (U??aki) in Afyonkarahisar, March 23, 1923.

On 29 January 1923, Mustafa Kemal married Latife U?akl?gil; they were divorced on 5 August 1925.[144] He never remarried. During his lifetime, Atatürk adopted twelve daughters and a son. In his leisure time, he enjoyed reading and writing (books and a personal journal), horseback riding, chess, and swimming. He was also an avid dancer and enjoyed both the waltz and traditional Zeybek folk dances.

During 1937, indications that Atatürk's health was worsening started to appear. In early 1938, while he was on a trip to Yalova, he suffered from a serious illness. He went to ?stanbul for treatment, where he was diagnosed with cirrhosis of the liver due to heavy alcohol consumption.[145][146] During his stay in ?stanbul, he made an effort to keep up with his regular lifestyle for a while. He died on 10 November 1938, at the age of 57, in the Dolmabahçe Palace, where he spent his last days.[147] The clock in the bedroom where he died is still set to the time of his death, 9:05 in the morning. Atatürk's funeral called forth both sorrow and pride in Turkey, and seventeen countries sent special representatives, while nine contributed armed detachments to the cortège.[94] Mustafa Kemal's remains were originally laid to rest in the Ethnography Museum of Ankara, and transferred on 10 November 1953, 15 years after his death in a 42-ton sarcophagus, to a mausoleum that overlooks Ankara,[148] An?tkabir. In his will, he donated all of his possessions to the Republican People's Party, providing that the yearly interest of his funds would be used to look after his sister Makbule and his adopted children, and fund the higher education of the children of ?smet ?nönü. The remainder of this yearly interest was willed to the Turkish Language Association and the Turkish Historical Society.
Legacy
Turkey
An?tkabir, the mausoleum of Kemal Atatürk, in Ankara, Turkey.

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk is commemorated by many memorials throughout Turkey, such as the Atatürk International Airport in Istanbul, the Atatürk Bridge over the Golden Horn (Haliç), the Atatürk Dam, and Atatürk Stadium. Atatürk statues have been erected in all Turkish cities by Turkish Government, and most towns have their own memorial to him. His face and name are seen and heard everywhere in Turkey; his portrait can be seen in all public buildings, in all schools and classrooms, on all school books, on all Turkish lira banknotes, and in the homes of many Turkish families.[149] At the exact time of his death, on every 10 November, at 09:05 a.m., most vehicles and people in the country's streets pause for one minute in remembrance.[150]
Atatürk's statues are erected in every town of Turkey. The Monument of the Republic, crafted by the famous Italian sculptor Pietro Canonica, is located at the Taksim Square in Istanbul.
Outlawing insults to his reminiscence

In 1951, the Turkish Parliament issued a law (5816) outlawing insults to his reminiscence (Turkish: Hat?ras?) or destruction of objects representing him.[151] The demarcation between a criticism and an insult was defined as a political argument and the minister of Justice (a political position) was assigned in Article 5 to execute the law rather than the public prosecutor.

In 2007 Youtube, geocities, and several blogger webpages was blocked by a Turkish court due to violation of this law. A government website [2] is also founded to denounce the websites those violate this law.

In 2010 the French-based NGO Reporters Without Borders declared that the Turkish laws to protect the memory of Kemal Ataturk are in contradiction with the current European Union standards of freedom of speech in news media.[152]
Worldwide

In 1981, the centennial of Atatürk's birth, his memory was honoured by the United Nations and UNESCO, which declared it The Atatürk Year in the World and adopted the Resolution on the Atatürk Centennial. The Atatürk Memorial in Wellington, New Zealand (which also serves as a memorial to the ANZAC troops who died at Gallipoli); the Atatürk Memorial in the place of honour on ANZAC Parade in Canberra, Australia; the Atatürk Forest in Israel; and the Atatürk Square in Rome, Italy, are only a few examples. He has roads named after him in several countries, like the Kemal Atatürk Marg in New Delhi, India, Kemal Atatürk Avenue in Dhaka, Bangladesh, the Atatürk Avenue in the heart of Islamabad in Pakistan, the Atatürk Road in the southern city of province of Sindh of Pakistan called Larkana where Atatürk visited back in 1923, Mustafá Kemal Atatürk street in the Naco district of Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic, and the street and memorial Atatürk in the Amsterdam-Noord borough of Amsterdam, Netherlands. The entrance to Princess Royal Harbour in Albany, Western Australia is named Atatürk Channel. Barack Obama, the 44th President of the United States, who visited his tomb and praised him, also expressed his view regarding Atatürk's legacy at his speech towards "the Muslim world" by stating Atatürk's "greatest legacy is Turkey's strong and secular democracy, and that is the work that this assembly carries on today."[153][154]
See also
Turkey portal
Biography portal
Politics portal

* Kemalism
* Revolution
* State socialism
* Young Turks
* Pan Turkism
* List of people on the cover of Time Magazine: 1920s – 24 Mar. 1923
* Chronology of the Turkish War of Independence
* List of high-ranking commanders of the Turkish War of Independence

Notes

1. ^ Zürcher, Turkey : a modern history, 142
2. ^ Mango, ibid, p. 29, about neighbourhoods of Salonique, cf. Meropi Anastassiadou, Salonique, 1830–1912: une ville ottomane à l'âge des Réformes, Brill, 1997, ISBN 90-04-10798-3, p. 71. (French)
3. ^ Cemal Çelebi Granda, Cemal Granda anlat?yor, Pal Medya ve Organizasyon, 2007, ISBN 9789944203012, p.
4. ^ Andrew Mango Atatürk: The Biography of the Founder of Modern Turkey, Overlook Press, 2002, ISBN 9781585673346, p. 25, p.27ff. – Feyzullah's family is said to have come from the country near Vodina (now Edhessa in western Greek Macedonia). The surname Sofuzade, meaning son of a pious man, suggests that the ancestors of Zübeyde and Ali R?za had a similar background. Cemil Bozok, son of Salih Bozok, who was a distant cousin of Atatürk and, later, his ADC, claims to have been related to both Ali R?za's and Zübeyde's families. This would mean that the families of Atatürk's parents were interrelated. Cemil Bozok also notes that his paternal grandfather, Safer Efendi, was of Albanian origin. This may have a bearing on the vexed question of Atatürk's ethnic origin. Atatürk's parents and relatives all used Turkish as their mother tongue. This suggests that some at least of their ancestors had originally come from Turkey, since local Muslims of Albanian and Slav origin who had no ethnic connection with Turkey spoke Albanian, Serbo-Croat or Bulgarian, at least so long as they remained in their native land., But in looks Ataturk resembled local Albanians and Slavs.[...] But there is no evidence that either Ali Riza or Zübeyde was descended from such Turkish nomads. page 28; It is much more likely that Atatürk inherited his looks from his Balkan ancestors.[...] But Albanians and Slavs are likely to have figured among his ancestors.
5. ^ "Turkey: The land a dictator turned into a democracy". Time. 12 October 1953. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,860057-2,00.html. Retrieved 19 May 2010.
6. ^ Patrick Kinross: Ataturk: the Rebirth of a Nation. London: Phoenix, 2001, p. 3.
7. ^ Gershom Scholem, "Doenmeh", Encyclopaedia Judaica, Second Edition, Volume 5: Coh-Doz, Macmillan Reference USA, Thomson Gale, 2007, ISBN 0-02-865933-3, p. 732.
8. ^ Mango, Andrew, Ataturk: The Biography of the Founder of Modern Turkey, (Overlook TP, 2002), p. 27.
9. ^ Lou Giaffo: Albania: Eye of the Balkan Vortex[page needed]
10. ^ a b Jackh, Ernest, The Rising Crescent, (Goemaere Press, 2007), p. 31, Turkish mother and Albanian father
11. ^ a b Isaac Frederick Marcosson, Turbulent years, Ayer Publishing, 1969, p. 144.
12. ^ Richmond, Yale, From Da to Yes: understanding the East Europeans, (Intercultural Press Inc., 1995), 212.
13. ^ Falih F?rk? Atay, Çankaya: Atatürk'ün do?umundan ölümüne kadar, Beta?, ?stanbul, 1984, p. 17. (Turkish)
14. ^ Vamik D. Volkan, Norman Itzkowitz, Ölümsüz Atatürk (Immortal Ataturk), Ba?lam Yay?nlar?, 1998, ISBN 975-7696-97-8, p. 37, dipnote no. 6 (Atay, 1980, s. 17)
15. ^ ?evket Süreyya Aydemir, Tek Adam: Mustafa Kemal, Birinci Cilt: 1881–1919, 14th edition, Remzi Kitabevi, 1997, ISBN 975-14-0212-3, p. 31. (Turkish)
16. ^ Afet Inan, Atatürk hakk?nda hât?ralar ve belgeler, Türk Tarih Kurumu Bas?mevi, 1959, p. 8.
17. ^ "Mustafa Kemal Atatürk". Turkish Embassy website. Archived from the original on September 27, 2007. http://web.archive.org/web/20070927211519/http://www.turkishembassy.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=300&Itemid=317. Retrieved 2007-08-07.
18. ^ Ali Fuat Cebesoy, S?n?f arkada??m Atatürk: okul ve genç subayl?k hât?ralar?, ?nk?lâp ve Aka Kitabevleri, 1967, p. 6. Benim ad?m Mustafa. Senin ad?n da Musfata. Arada bir fark olmal?, ne dersin, senin ad?n?n sonuna bir de Kemal koyal?m.
19. ^ Mango, Atatürk, p. 37.
20. ^ a b c d T.C. Genelkurmay Harp Tarihi Ba?kanl??? Yay?nlar?, Türk ?stiklâl Harbine Kat?lan Tümen ve Daha Üst Kademlerdeki Komutanlar?n Biyografileri, Genkurmay Ba?kanl??? Bas?mevi, Ankara, 1972, p. 1. (Turkish)
21. ^ Falih F?rk? Atay, Çankaya: Atatürk'ün do?umundan ölümüne kadar, Beta?, ?stanbul, 1984, p. 29. (Turkish)
22. ^ The Encyclopædia Britannica, Vol.7, Edited by Hugh Chisholm, (1911), 3; "Constantinople, the capital of the Turkish Empire...".
23. ^ Mango, ibid, p. 37.
24. ^ a b T.C. Genelkurmay Ba?kanl??? Yay?nlar?, ibid, p. 2.
25. ^ http://albania.dyndns.org/Presse/2004/01102004.htm "1910, Albania broke a major uprising. Minister of War, Shefqet Mahmut Pasha, was personally involved in its printing. For this purpose decided to call his war headquarters Qemali Mustafa who was known as one of the generals prepared and laid him drafting the plan of operations. Mustafa at this time was in the Fifth Army Headquarters in Thessaloniki."
26. ^ http://www.zeriyt.com/mustafa-ataturku-krijuesi-i-turqise-moderne-t37510.0.html M. Kamal had assisted in the military operation in Albania in 1910.
27. ^ http://www.albanianhistory.net/texts20_1/AH1912_3.html
28. ^ Enstehung und Ausbau der Königsdiktatur in Albanien, 1912-1939 Von Michael Schmidt-Neke
29. ^ http://www.albislam.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=1137:prezantim-per-librin-kujtime-&catid=580:libri&Itemid=774 "I remember well the meeting very interesting, I had casually with Mustafa Qemali in 1910, at the time, still a mere lieutenant.
30. ^ KUJTIME nga: Eqrem Bej Vlora. Ekrem Bey Vlora, Lebenserinnerungen - Teilband II: 1912-1925
31. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n Ana Britannica (1987) Vol. 2 (Ami - Avr): Atatürk, Mustafa Kemal. Page: 490.
32. ^ The History of the Italian-Turkish War, William Henry Beehler, page 96
33. ^ a b The History of the Italian-Turkish War, William Henry Beehler, page 14
34. ^ Richard C. Hall, The Balkan Wars 1912–1913: Prelude to the First World War, Routledge, 2002, p. 81.
35. ^ Edward J. Erickson, Defeat in Detail: The Ottoman Army in the Balkans, 1912–1913, Praeger, 2003, ISBN 0-275-97888-5, p. 255.
36. ^ a b Lengyel, They called him Atatürk, 68
37. ^ Kinross, Atatürk: The Rebirth of a Nation, 100
38. ^ Mustafa Kemal Pasha's speech on his arrival in Ankara in November 1919
39. ^ Andrew Mango, Atatürk, John Murray, 1999, ISBN 978-0-7195-6592-2, p. 214.
40. ^ Ahmad, The Making of Modern Turkey, 50
41. ^ ?. ???????. ??????. Moscow, 1995, p. 241.
42. ^ editorial staff. "A short history of AA". Anadolu Ajans? Genel Müdürlü?ü. http://www.aa.com.tr/tarihce_en/. Retrieved 2008-01-01. "Ikdam newspaper dated 9 August 1921, reproducing the dispatches of AA dated 5 August and 6th, 1921, announced that Mustafa Kemal Pasha was promoted to Chief Commander"
43. ^ Greco-Turkish wars, Britannica CD 99
44. ^ James, Edwin L. "Kemal Won't Insure Against Massacres," New York Times, September 11, 1922.
45. ^ Shaw, History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey, 365
46. ^ Mango, Atatürk, 394
47. ^ a b Mango, Atatürk, 367
48. ^ Gerd Nonneman, Analyzing Middle East foreign policies and the relationship with Europe, Published 2005 Routledge, p. 204 ISBN 0714684279
49. ^ Webster, The Turkey of Atatürk: social process in the Turkish reformation, 245
50. ^ Mango, Atatürk, 391–392
51. ^ a b Mango, Atatürk, 362
52. ^ Landau, Atatürk and the Modernization of Turkey, 252
53. ^ Mango, Atatürk, 501
54. ^ a b c Koçak, Cemil (2005) "Parliament Membership during the Single-Party System in Turkey (1925–1945)", European Journal of Turkish Studies
55. ^ John O. Voll: Professor of Islamic history at Georgetown University http://www.nationalinterest.org/Article.aspx?id=13296
56. ^ Mango, Atatürk, 403
57. ^ a b Mango, Atatürk, 401
58. ^ a b c d e Majid Khadduri (2006) War and peace in the law of Islam, The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd., ISBN 1584776951 page 290-291
59. ^ Mango, Atatürk, 404
60. ^ Eksi, Oktay (2008-04-16). "Paralardaki resimler". Hurriyet. http://hurarsiv.hurriyet.com.tr/goster/haber.aspx?id=8711441&yazarid=1. Retrieved 2008-04-24. "?smet Pa?a "kurumla?ma" ile neyi kastetti?ini de ?öyle anlatt?:
Biz Cumhuriyeti kurdu?umuz zaman onu ya?at?p ya?atamayaca??m?z en büyük sorun idi. Çünkü Saltanat?n ve Hilafetin la?v?na kar?? olanlar?n say?s? çoktu ve hedefleri de Cumhuriyetti. Cumhuriyetin 10 ya??na bast???n? görmek o yüzden önemliydi. Nitekim büyük Atatürk'ün emriyle 10'uncu y?l kutlamalar? çok büyük bir bayram oldu. Biz de Cumhuriyetin ve devletin kurumla?t???n? göstermeye bundan sonra hep itina ettik..."
61. ^ a b c d e f g h i Wolf-Gazo, John Dewey in Turkey: An Educational Mission, 15–42.
62. ^ Republic Of Turkey Ministry Of National Education. "Atatürk’s views on education". T.C. Government. http://www.meb.gov.tr/Stats/apk2001ing/Section_0/AtaturksViewon.htm. Retrieved 2007-11-20.
63. ^ a b c ??demir, Atatürk, 165–170
64. ^ Quoted in Atatürkism, Volume 1 (Istanbul: Office of the Chief of General Staff, 1982), 126.
65. ^ Patrick Kinross, Atatürk, The Rebirth of a Nation, 397
66. ^ a b c d e f Mango, Ataturk, 418
67. ^ Weiker, Book Review of Zürcher's "Political Opposition in the Early Turkish Republic: The Progressive Republican Party, 1924–1925", 297–298
68. ^ Touraj Atabaki, Erik Jan Zürcher, 2004, Men of Order: authoritarian modernization under Atatürk and Reza Shah, I.B.Tauris, ISBN 1860644260, page 207
69. ^ http://www.tsk.mil.tr/eng/Anitkabir/p24.html TSK Anitkabir sayfa 24[dead link]
70. ^ a b Daisy Hilse Dwyer, (1990), "Law and Islam in the Middle East", page 77, ISBN 9780897891516
71. ^ Atillasoy, Atatürk : The First President and Founder of the Turkish Republic, 13.
72. ^ Mango, Atatürk, 164
73. ^ Tüfekçi, Universality of Atatürk's philosophy
74. ^ Kinross, Ataturk, The Rebirth of a Nation, p. 343
75. ^ Atillasoy, Atatürk : first president and founder of the Turkish Republic, 15
76. ^ Dundar, Can (2005-04-25). "Türke?, Atatürk'ün imzas?n? hat?rlatt?" (in Turkish). Milliyet. http://www.milliyet.com.tr/2005/04/25/yazar/dundar.html. "Atatürk'ün imzas?n? bir Ermeni güzel yaz? hocas?n?n çizdi?ini duymu? muydun?"
77. ^ Özelli, The Evolution of the Formal Educational System and Its Relation to Economic Growth Policies in the First Turkish Republic, 77–92
78. ^ Mango, Atatürk, 536
79. ^ ?nan, Atatürk Hakk?nda Hat?ralar ve Belgeler, 260
80. ^ a b "About Us". Archived from the original on November 17, 2007. http://web.archive.org/web/20071117232115/http://www.ted.org.tr/EN/BelgeGoster.aspx?17A16AE30572D313AAF6AA849816B2EF01E9BE68C047FEF5. Retrieved 2008-02-01.
81. ^ Saikal, Democratization in the Middle East: Experiences, Struggles, Challenges, 95
82. ^ a b Geoffrey L. Lewis (1999), The Turkish Language Reform: A Catastrophic Success, Oxford University Press ISBN 0198238568 page 66
83. ^ "Turks Teach New Theories". The New York Times (Istanbul). 1936-02-09.
84. ^ Laut (2002)
85. ^ a b Cleveland, A History of the Modern Middle East, 181
86. ^ a b c Michael Radu, (2003), "Dangerous Neighborhood: Contemporary Issues in Turkey's Foreign Relations", page 125, ISBN 9780765801661
87. ^ S. M. Zwemer: Translations of the Koran, The Moslem World, 1915
88. ^ M. Brett Wilson, "The First Translations of the Qur'an in Modern Turkey (1924–1938)," International Journal of Middle East Studies, volume 41, issue 03, pp. 419–435.
89. ^ Elmal?l? Hamdi Yaz?r, (1935), "Hak dini Kur'an dili: Yeni mealli Turkce tefsir" 9 volumes, printed in Istanbul
90. ^ Paydak, Selda (January 2000). "Interview with Semiha Berksoy". Representation of the European Commission to Turkey. Archived from the original on 2003-04-18. http://web.archive.org/web/20030418082022/http://www.deltur.cec.eu.int/english/guncel/ghaber-jan00_18.html. Retrieved 2007-02-11.
91. ^ Omur, Modernity and Islam: Experiences of Turkish Women
92. ^ Atatürk, Vatanda? ?çin Medeni Bilgiler
93. ^ ?nan, Medeni bilgiler ve M. Kemal Atatürk'ün el yaz?lar?
94. ^ a b Mango, Atatürk 526
95. ^ Prof. Dr. Hamza Ero?lu. "Peace at home and peace in the world" (in Turkish). http://www.atam.gov.tr/index.php?Page=DergiIcerik&IcerikNo=72. Retrieved 2008-01-01. "“Yurtta Sulh” her?eyden önce ülkede, o insan?n, insanca ya?amas?n?, insanl?k t?ynetinin gere?inin tan?nmas?n? ifade eder"."
96. ^ Enver Ziya Karal (in Turkish). Atatürk’ten Dü?ünceler. p. 123. "“Haricî siyaset bir heyet-i içtimaiyenin te?ekkülü dahilisi ile s?k? surette alâkadard?r. Çünkü te?ekkül-ü dahiliyeye istinat etmeyen haricî siyasetler daima mahkûm kal?rlar. Bir heyet-i içtimaiyenin te?ekkül-ü dahilisi ne kadar kuvvetli olursa, siyaset-i hariciyesi de o nisbette kavi ve rasin olur.”"
97. ^ a b Peter Sluglett, "The Primacy of Oil in Britain’s Iraq Policy", in the book "Britain in Iraq: 1914–1932" London: Ithaca Press, 1976, pp. 103–116
98. ^ Can Dundar. "Atatürk ya?asayd?" (in Turkish). http://www.candundar.com.tr/index.php?Did=766. Retrieved 2008-01-01. "... Ata'n?n öncelikli d?? politika sorununun Musul oldu?unu söylüyor. Musul'u b?rakmama konusunda aktif bir politika izlenmesinden yana oldu?unu belirtiyor..."
99. ^ Harold Courtenay Armstrong Gray Wolf, Mustafa Kemal: An Intimate Study of a Dictator. page 225
100. ^ Olson, Robert W. (1989) The Emergence of Kurdish Nationalism and the Sheikh Said Rebellion, 1880–1925, p.45
101. ^ Kinross, 401
102. ^ ASD: Speeches and statements by Ataturk, volume I pages 361–363 published by Ataturk Culture, language and history Higher Institute, Ankara 1989
103. ^ Andrew Mango, Atatürk and the Kurds, Middle Eastern Studies, Vol.35, No.4, 1999, 20
104. ^ ????????????? ????? (the Soviet Foreign Minisrty's magazine). Moscow, 1963, ? 11, pp. 147-148. The first publication of Kemal's letter to Lenin in excerpts, in Russian.
105. ^ ????????????? ?????. Moscow, 1963, ? 11, p. 148.
106. ^ a b c Y?lmaz Altu?, Foreign Policy Of Atatürk, Ataturk arastirma merkezi dergisi, Vol VI, No 16, November 1989
107. ^ ?. ???????. ??????. Moscow, 1995, p. 227-228.
108. ^ ?. ???????. ??????. Moscow, 1995, p. 228.
109. ^ Y?lmaz Altu?, Türk Devrim Tarihi Dersim, 1919–1938, 1980 s. p. 136.
110. ^ John P. Kinross. Atatürk: a biography of Mustafa Kemal, father of modern Turkey. New York, 1965, p. 464.
111. ^ ???, 1-st edition, Moscow, Vol. 55, 1947, column 374.
112. ^ ???, 1-st edition, Moscow, Vol. 55, 1947, column 377.
113. ^ a b "Oh, What Happiness!". Time Magazine: pp. 37–39. 6 November 1933. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,746241-1,00.html. Retrieved 2007-08-07.
114. ^ ???, 2-st edition, Moscow, Vol. 20, 1953, p. 504.
115. ^ Karamanlis, 1995, p. 95-97
116. ^ Sosyal, Ismail, 1983, "Turkey's Diplomatic treaties", TTK, Ankara page 29
117. ^ Clogg, Richard (2002). A Concise History of Greece. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521004799. p. 107
118. ^ Nobel Foundation. The Nomination Database for the Nobel Prize in Peace, 1901–1955.[1]
119. ^ Jentleson, Bruce W.; Paterson, Thomas G. (1997). The American Journal of International Law. Oxford University Press. p. 24. ISBN 0195110552.
120. ^ Narli, Nilüfer (1993): "Turco-Iranian Relations from the Islamic Revolution to Gulf War and Beyond: Co-operation or Competition in the Muslim World". CEMOTI. (15): 265–295
121. ^ a b c Gokhan Cetinsaya "Essential friends and natural enemies: the historical roots of Turkish-Iranian relations." Middle East Review of International Affairs Volume 7, No. 3 – September 2003
122. ^ Rajaee, Farhang, Islamic Values and World View: Farhang Khomeyni on Man, the State and International Politics, Volume XIII (PDF), University Press of America. ISBN 0-8191-3578-X
123. ^ Mango, Ataturk, page 510
124. ^ Sosyal, Ismail, 1983, "Turkey's Diplomatic treaties", TTK, Ankara page 493
125. ^ Yilmaz Altuð, "Atatürk'ün Dis Politikasý," B.Ü. Uluslararasi Atatürk Konferansý Tebligleri, 10–11 November 1980, Vol. II, Istanbul 1981, p. 486.
126. ^ Þevket Süreyya Aydemir, Tek Adam, Vol. 3, Ýstanbul 1988, p. 331.
127. ^ Atatürk'ün Milli Dýþ Politikasý, Vol. 2, p. 355
128. ^ Huntington, Political Order in Changing Societies, 347–357
129. ^ a b Mango, Atatürk, 470
130. ^ Shaw, History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey, 232–233.
131. ^ Aysu, Abdullah (2003-01-29). "Tütün, ?çki ve Tekel" (in Turkish). B?A Haber Merkezi. http://www.bianet.org/2003/01/30/16340.htm. Retrieved 2007-10-10.
132. ^ Ibrahim Kaya, Social Theory and Later Modernities, page 90
133. ^ Mango, Atatürk, 478
134. ^ a b c d Barlas, Etatism and Diplomacy in Turkey: Economic and Foreign Policy Strategies in an Uncertain World, 1929–1939
135. ^ Emrence, Turkey in economic crisis (1927–1930): a panoramic vision. Journal Middle Eastern Studies
136. ^ "Skylife". http://www.thy.com/en-INT/skylife/archive/en/2000_1/konu10.htm#1. Retrieved 2007-11-26.
137. ^ "History of Turkish Aeronautical Association". http://www.thk.org.tr/yeni/tarihce/tarihceeng.htm. Retrieved 2007-11-26.
138. ^ Dilek Barlas, Etatism and Diplomacy in Turkey: Economic and Foreign Policy Strategies p. 61
139. ^ Webster, The Turkey of Atatürk: Social Process in the Turkish Reformation, 260
140. ^ Do?an, Formation of factory settlements within Turkish industrialization and modernization in 1930s: Nazilli printing factory
141. ^ Republic of Turkey, Ministry of Culture and Tourism. "Ayd?n — Historical Ruins". T.C. Government. http://www.kultur.gov.tr/EN/BelgeGoster.aspx?17A16AE30572D313679A66406202CCB09837F9A3538A2623. Retrieved 2007. "Nazilli cotton print factory was established over an area of 65.000 m2 on the Nazilli Bozdo?an highway. It is the "first Turkish cotton print factory" the foundation of which was laid on 25 August 1935 and which was opened by Atatürk with great ceremony."
142. ^ Stone, Norman "Talking Turkey". National Interest, Fall2000, Issue 61.
143. ^ a b Eastham, The Turkish Development Plan: The First Five Years, 132–136
144. ^ Akhtar, Salman (2008). The Crescent and the Couch: Cross-Currents Between Islam and Psychoanalysis. Rowman & Littlefield. p. 68. ISBN 0765705745.
145. ^ Volkan, Vamik D. (1981). "'Immortal' Atatürk—Narcissism and Creativity in a Revolutionary Leader". The Psychoanalytic Study of Society 9: 221–255.
146. ^ Post, Jerrold M.; Robert S. Robins (1995). When Illness Strikes the Leader: The Dilemma of the Captive King. Yale UP. p. 84. ISBN 9780300063141. http://books.google.com/?id=SvU-aEsPWdoC&pg=PA84#v=onepage&q=.
147. ^ Atatürk'ün Hayat? (Atatürk's Life). Ministry of Culture and Tourism (Turkey) (Turkish).
148. ^ "The Burial of Atatürk". Time Magazine: pp. 37–39. 23 November 1953. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,860125,00.html. Retrieved 2007-08-07.
149. ^ Navaro-Yashin, Yael (2002). Faces of the State: Secularism and Public Life in Turkey. Princeton University Press. pp. 196–99. ISBN 0691088454.
150. ^ Morrison, Terry; Conaway, Wayne A. (1994). Kiss, Bow, Or Shake Hands: How to Do Business in Sixty Countries. Adams Media. p. 392. ISBN 1558504443.
151. ^ Yonah, Alexander (2007). Turkey: Terrorism, Civil Rights, and the European Union. Routledge. p. 137. ISBN 0415441633.
152. ^ Time to break out of legislative straitjacket that is stifling media freedom, Reporters Sans Frontières, December 1, 2010
153. ^ Chen, Edwin (7 April 2009). "Obama Praises Modern Turkey’s Founder Ataturk". http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aau7JxTiWhW8&refer=home. Retrieved 8 April 2009.
154. ^ RAUM, TOM (6 April 2009). "Obama to Muslim world: No US war with Islam". http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090406/ap_on_go_pr_wh/eu_obama. Retrieved 8 April 2009. [dead link]

References

Prints

* Ahmad, Feroz (1993). The Making of Modern Turkey. London; New York: Routledge. ISBN 978-0415078351.
* Armstrong, Harold Courtenay (1972). Grey Wolf, Mustafa Kemal: An Intimate Study of a Dictator. Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press. ISBN 978-0836969627.
* Atillasoy, Yüksel (2002). Atatürk: First President and Founder of the Turkish Republic. Woodside, NY: Woodside House. ISBN 978-0971235342.
* Barber, Noel (1988). Lords of the Golden Horn: From Suleiman the Magnificent to Kemal Ataturk. London: Arrow. ISBN 978-0099539506.
* Barlas, Dilek (1998). Statism and Diplomacy in Turkey: Economic and Foreign Policy Strategies in an Uncertain World, 1929–1939. New York: Brill Academic Publishers. ISBN 978-9004108554.
* Cleveland, William L (2004). A History of the Modern Middle East. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. ISBN 978-0813340487.
* Do?an, Ça?atay Emre (2003) (in Turkish). Formation of Factory Settlements Within Turkish Industrialization and Modernization in 1930s: Nazilli Printing Factory. Ankara: Middle East Technical University. OCLC 54431696.
* Huntington, Samuel P. (2006). Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, Conn.; London: Yale University Press. ISBN 978-0300116205.
* ??demir, Ulu?; Mango, Andrew (translation) (1963). Atatürk. Ankara: Turkish National Commission for UNESCO. pp. 165–170. OCLC 75604149.
* ?nan, Ay?e Afet (2007) (in Turkish). Atatürk Hakk?nda Hat?ralar ve Belgeler. Istanbul: Türkiye ?? Bankas? Kültür Yay?nlar?. ISBN 9944881401.
* ?nan, Ay?e Afet; Sevim, Ali; Süslü, Azmi; Tural, M Akif (1998) (in Turkish). Medeni bilgiler ve M. Kemal Atatürk'ün el Yaz?lar?. Ankara: AKDTYK Atatürk Ara?t?rma Merkezi. ISBN 978-9751612762.
* Kinross, Patrick (2003). Atatürk: The Rebirth of a Nation. London: Phoenix Press. ISBN 978-1842125991. OCLC 55516821.
* Kinross, Patrick (1979). The Ottoman Centuries: The Rise and Fall of the Turkish Empire. New York: Morrow. ISBN 978-0688080938.
* Landau, Jacob M (1983). Atatürk and the Modernization of Turkey. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. ISBN 978-0865319868.
* Lengyel, Emil (1962). They Called Him Atatürk. New York: The John Day Co. OCLC 1337444.
* Mango, Andrew (2002) [1999]. Ataturk: The Biography of the Founder of Modern Turkey (Paperback ed.). Woodstock, NY: Overlook Press, Peter Mayer Publishers, Inc. ISBN 1-58567-334-x.
* Mango, Andrew (2004). Atatürk. London: John Murray. ISBN 978-0719565922.
* Saikal, Amin; Schnabel, Albrecht (2003). Democratization in the Middle East: Experiences, Struggles, Challenges. Tokyo: United Nations University Press. ISBN 978-9280810851. http://books.google.com/?id=qFhU3kWXLvEC&printsec=frontcover&dq=ataturk+and+islam.
* Shaw, Stanford Jay; Shaw, Ezel Kural (1976–1977). History of the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0521212809.
* Spangnolo, John (1992). The Modern Middle East in Historical Perspective: Essays in Honour of Albert Hourani. Oxford: Middle East Centre, St. Antony's College. ISBN 978-0863721649. OCLC 80503960.
* Tunçay, Mete (1972) (in Turkish). Mesaî : Halk ?ûrâlar F?rkas? Program?, 1920. Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi. OCLC 1926301.
* Tüfekçi, Gürbüz D (1981). Universality of Atatürk's Philosophy. Ankara: Pan Matbaac?l?k. OCLC 54074541.
* Yapp, Malcolm (1987). The Making of the Modern Near East, 1792–1923. London ; New York: Longman. ISBN 978-0582493803.
* Webster, Donald Everett (1973). The Turkey of Atatürk; Social Process in the Turkish Reformation. New York: AMS Press. ISBN 978-0404563332.
* Zürcher, Erik Jan (2004). Turkey: A Modern History. London; New York: I.B. Tauris. ISBN 978-1850433996.

Journals

* Eastham, J. K. (March 1964). "The Turkish Development Plan: The First Five Years". The Economic Journal (New York: Macmillan) 74 (298): 132–136. doi:10.2307/2228117. ISSN 0013-0133. http://jstor.org/stable/2228117.
* Emrence, Cem (2003). "Turkey in Economic Crisis (1927–1930): A Panaromic Vision". Middle Eastern Studies (London: F. Cass.) 39 (4): 67–80. doi:10.1080/00263200412331301787. ISSN 0026-3206.
* Omur, Asl? (December 2002). "Modernity and Islam: Experiences of Turkish Women". Turkish Times 13 (312). ISSN 1043-0164. http://www.theturkishtimes.com/archive/02/12_01/c_women.html. Retrieved 2007-10-10.
* Özelli, M. Tunç (January 1974). "The Evolution of the Formal Educational System and its Relation to Economic Growth Policies in the First Turkish Republic". International Journal of Middle East Studies (London: Cambridge University Press) 5 (1): 77–92. ISSN 0020-7438. http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0020-7438%28197401%295%3A1%3C77%3ATEOTFE%3E2.0.CO%3B2-G.
* Stone, Norman (2000). "Talking Turkey". The National Interest (New York: National Affairs, Inc) 61: 66. ISSN 0884-9382.
* Volkan, Vamik D. (1981). "Immortal Atatürk — Narcissism and Creativity in a Revolutionary Leader". Psychoanalytic Study of Society (New York: Psychohistory Press) 9: 221–255. ISSN 0079-7294. OCLC 60448681.
* Wolf-Gazo, Ernest (1996). "John Dewey in Turkey: An Educational Mission". Journal of American Studies of Turkey (Ankara, Turkey: American Studies Association of Turkey) 3: 15–42. ISSN 1300-6606. http://www.bilkent.edu.tr/~jast/Number3/Gazo.html. [dead link]
* "Mustafa Kemal Atatürk". TP Editors: pp. 7–8. http://www.teknikportal.com/mustafa-kemal-ataturk-hayati-basarilari-t9870.0.html. Retrieved 2008-04-29.
* "The Burial of Atatürk". Time Magazine: pp. 37–39. 23 November 1953. http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,860125,00.html. Retrieved 2007-08-07.

External links
Find more about Mustafa Kemal Atatürk on Wikipedia's sister projects:
Definitions from Wiktionary
Images and media from Commons
Learning resources from Wikiversity
News stories from Wikinews
Quotations from Wikiquote
Source texts from Wikisource
Textbooks from Wikibooks

* Memorial room in Bitola (Monastir)

Military offices
Preceded by
Ahmet ?zzet Furgaç Commander of the Second Army
March – July 1917 Succeeded by
Fevzi Çakmak
Preceded by
Unknown Commander of the Seventh Army
July – October 1917 Succeeded by
Fevzi Çakmak
Preceded by
Fevzi Çakmak Commander of the Seventh Army
August – September 1918 Formation destroyed
Preceded by
Otto Liman von Sanders Commander of Thunder Army Group
Residual elements
October – November 1918 Formation dissolved
Political offices
New title
State founded
Prime Minister of Turkey
25 April 1920–24 January 1921 Succeeded by
Fevzi Çakmak
Preceded by
founded Speaker of the Parliament of Turkey
24 April 1920–29 October 1923 Succeeded by
Ali Fethi Okyar
Preceded by
founded President of Turkey
29 October 1923–10 November 1938 Succeeded by
?smet ?nönü
Party political offices
Preceded by
founded Leader of the Republican People's Party
9 September 1923–10 November 1938 Succeeded by
?smet ?nönü
[show]v · d · ePresidents of the Republic of Turkey (List)
Presidential Seal of the Republic of Turkey.svg

Mustafa Kemal Atatürk · ?smet ?nönü · Celâl Bayar · Cemal Gürsel · Cevdet Sunay · Fahri Korutürk · Kenan Evren · Turgut Özal · Süleyman Demirel · Ahmet Necdet Sezer · Abdullah Gül
Standard of the President of Turkey
[show]v · d · ePrime Ministers of the Republic of Turkey (List)
War of Independence
(1920–1923)
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk · Fevzi Çakmak · Rauf Orbay · Ali Fethi Okyar
Republic of Turkey
(since 1923)
?smet ?nönü · Ali Fethi Okyar · ?smet ?nönü · Celal Bayar · Refik Saydam · ?ükrü Saraco?lu · Recep Peker · Hasan Saka · ?emsettin Günaltay · Adnan Menderes · Cemal Gürsel · ?smet ?nönü · Suat Hayri Ürgüplü · Süleyman Demirel · Nihat Erim · Ferit Melen · Naim Talu · Bülent Ecevit · Sadi Irmak · Süleyman Demirel · Bülent Ecevit · Süleyman Demirel · Bülent Ecevit · Süleyman Demirel · Bülent Ulusu · Turgut Özal · Y?ld?r?m Akbulut · Mesut Y?lmaz · Süleyman Demirel · Tansu Çiller · Mesut Y?lmaz · Necmettin Erbakan · Mesut Y?lmaz · Bülent Ecevit · Abdullah Gül · Recep Tayyip Erdo?an
Republic of Turkey
(since 1923, acting)
Ahmet Fikri Tüzer · Emin Fahrettin Özdilek · Ali Bozer · Erdal ?nönü
[show]v · d · eSpeakers of the Parliament of the Republic of Turkey
Grand National Assembly
(1920–1960)
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk · Ali Fethi Okyar · Kâz?m Özalp · Abdülhalik Renda · Kâz?m Karabekir · Ali Fuat Cebesoy · ?ükrü Saraco?lu · Refik Koraltan
House of Representatives
(1961)
Kâz?m Orbay
National Assembly
(1961–1980)
Fuat Sirmen · Ferruh Bozbeyli · Sabit Osman Avc? · Kemal Güven · Cahit Karaka?
Consultative Assembly
(1981–1983)
Sadi Irmak
Grand National Assembly
(since 1983)
Necmettin Karaduman · Y?ld?r?m Akbulut · ?smet Kaya Erdem · Hüsamettin Cindoruk · ?smet Sezgin · Mustafa Kalemli · Hikmet Çetin · Ömer ?zgi · Bülent Ar?nç · Köksal Toptan · Mehmet Ali ?ahin
[show]v · d · eLeaders of the Republican People's Party
Mustafa Kemal Atatürk · ?smet ?nönü · Bülent Ecevit · Deniz Baykal · Hikmet Çetin · Deniz Baykal · Altan Öymen · Deniz Baykal · Kemal K?l?çdaro?lu
[show]v · d · eTurkey Turkey topics
People and
biographies
Turkish people · Atatürk
Coat of arms of Turkey
History
(timeline)
Early

Sultanate of Rûm · Anatolian Turkish Beyliks
Ottoman

Rise · Growth · Stagnation · Decline · Dissolution
Republic

War of Independence · Single-party period · Multi-party period
By topic

Constitutional · Economic · Military
Politics and
government
President · Prime Minister · Parliament · Council of Ministers · Political parties · Elections · EU accession · Foreign relations · Military · Human rights · LGBT rights · Secularism · Ottomanism · Kemalism · Neo-Ottomanism · Deep state
Legal system
Constitution · Constitutional Court · Official Gazette · Crime · Law enforcement
Geography
Anatolia · Thrace · Regions · Provinces · Districts · Cities · Metropolitan centers · Environmental issues · Mountains · Islands · Rivers · Lakes · Peninsulas · Capes · Bays · Turkish Riviera
Economy and
transport
Industries · Companies · Stock Exchange · Central Bank · Other banks · EU Customs Union · Southeastern Anatolia Project · Tourism · Currency · Railways · Aviation
Demographics and Religion
Turkish language · Languages of Turkey · Education · Religion · Islam · Turkish population · Turkish diaspora · Immigration
Culture and
media
Ottoman architecture · Art · Cinema · Cuisine · Dance · Festivals · Folklore · Public holidays · Literature · Music · Smoking · Sport · Theatre · Wine · Newspapers · Radio stations · Television
Symbols
Emblem · Flag · Presidential Seal · National anthem
Portal

Persondata
Name Atatürk, Mustafa Kemal
Alternative names Pasha, Gazi Mustafa Kemal (former name)
Short description Turkish officer and statesman
Date of birth 1881
Place of birth Selânik (Thessaloniki)
Date of death 10 November 1938
Place of death Dolmabahçe Palace, Istanbul

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mustafa_Kemal_Atat%C3%BCrk"
Categories: 1881 births | 1938 deaths | People from Thessaloniki | Deaths from cirrhosis | Field Marshals of Turkey | Leaders of the Republican People's Party (Turkey) | Leaders who took power by coup | Mustafa Kemal Atatürk | Ottoman Empire in World War I | Ottoman military personnel of the Balkan Wars | Ottoman military personnel of World War I | Turkish War of Independence | Ottoman Thessalonica | Pashas | People illustrated on Turkish banknotes | Presidents of Turkey | Prime Ministers of Turkey | Revolutionaries | Secularism | Secularism in Turkey | Republicanism in Turkey | Speakers of the Parliament of Turkey | Recipients of the Order of the Medjidieh | Recipients of the Order of Osminieh | Légion d'honneur recipients | Recipients of the Order of St Alexander | Recipients of the Imtiyaz Medal | Recipients of the Liakat Medal | Recipients of the Iron Cross | Recipients of the Military Merit Medal (Austria-Hungary) | Recipients of the Military Merit Cross (Austria-Hungary) | Recipients of the Order of the Crown (Prussia) | Recipients of the Medal of Independence with Red-Green Ribbon (Turkey) | Committee of Union and Progress politicians | Deists
Hidden categories: All pages needing cleanup | Wikipedia articles needing page number citations from September 2010 | All articles with dead external links | Articles with dead external links from October 2010 | Articles with dead external links from September 2010 | Wikipedia semi-protected pages | NPOV disputes from February 2011 | All NPOV disputes | All articles with unsourced statements | Articles with unsourced statements from December 2008 | Articles containing Turkish language text | Wikipedia articles needing clarification from December 2008 | Articles with dead external links from June 2010 | Articles containing video clips
Personal tools

* Log in / create account

Namespaces

* Article
* Discussion

Variants

Views

* Read
* View source
* View history

Actions

Search
Search
Navigation

* Main page
* Contents
* Featured content
* Current events
* Random article
* Donate to Wikipedia

Interaction

* Help
* About Wikipedia
* Community portal
* Recent changes
* Contact Wikipedia

Toolbox

* What links here
* Related changes
* Upload file
* Special pages
* Permanent link
* Cite this page

Print/export

* Create a book
* Download as PDF
* Printable version

Languages

* Afrikaans
* ???????
* Aragonés
* Az?rbaycanca
* ?????
* Bahasa Banjar
* Bân-lâm-gú
* ?????????
* ??????????
* ??????????? (???????????)?
* Bosanski
* Brezhoneg
* ?????????
* Català
* Cebuano
* ?esky
* Cymraeg
* Dansk
* Deutsch
* Eesti
* ????????
* Español
* Esperanto
* Euskara
* ?????
* Fiji Hindi
* Français
* Frysk
* Gaeilge
* Galego
* ??
* ???
* ???????
* ??????
* Hrvatski
* Ido
* Bahasa Indonesia
* ??????
* isiXhosa
* Íslenska
* Italiano
* ?????
* Basa Jawa
* ?????
* ???????????? / Qabardjaj?bza
* ????????-???????
* ???????
* ???????
* Kinyarwanda
* ????????
* Kiswahili
* Kurdî
* ????? ????
* Latina
* Latviešu
* Lëtzebuergesch
* Lietuvi?
* Lumbaart
* Magyar
* ??????????
* ??????
* ?????
* ????
* Bahasa Melayu
* ??????
* ??????????
* Nederlands
* ???
* ?Norsk (bokmål)?
* ?Norsk (nynorsk)?
* Occitan
* O'zbek
* ??????
* Polski
* Português
* Q?r?mtatarca
* Român?
* Runa Simi
* ??????????
* ???????
* ???? ????
* Sardu
* Scots
* Shqip
* Simple English
* Sloven?ina
* Slovenš?ina
* Soomaaliga
* ?????
* ?????? / Srpski
* Srpskohrvatski / ??????????????
* Suomi
* Svenska
* Tagalog
* ?????
* ???????/Tatarça
* ??????
* ???
* Türkçe
* Türkmençe
* ??????
* ??????????
* ????
* ???????? / Uyghurche?
* Ti?ng Vi?t
* Winaray
* ??????
* Yorùbá
* Zazaki
* Žemait?ška
* ??

* This page was last modified on 30 March 2011 at 21:14.
* Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details.
Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
* Contact us

* Privacy policy
* About Wikipedia
* Disclaimers

* Wikimedia Foundation
* Powered by MediaWiki

 

EMREY?LMAZ

12:11 PM ET

April 1, 2011

lan ahmet serefsizi bak buraya bak

satici kopek ne lan burda dersim dersim diye vik vik yapiyosun ananin ami!! icimizdeki hainler her yerde kendini belli ediyo. dersinizi sikeriz ulan serefsizler.adam olun sukredin!bas kaldiranin basini kestik sendende kac tane daha kaldiysa kesmeye devam edicez serefsizler! türk degilseniz itaat edeceksiniz ulan! basimizdaki cahil kani emenlerden de birgun kurtulacagiz ve o zaman kacacak delik aricaksiniz kansiz kopekler!

 

KURDO

1:01 PM ET

April 1, 2011

I love this guy

Ataturk at the right list, right place for the firts time. Thank you sir! Butun turklere: Ataturk bir oruspu cocuguydu, ama bunu size söylemeyi unutmuslar o pic ögretmenleriniz.

Best regards
Bijî Kurdistan

 

ZORBA

1:46 PM ET

April 1, 2011

BE CAREFUL WITH YOUR ARTICLE AND HISTORY INFORMATION!

Dear Sir/Madam;

It is very unfortunate to read this article which contain some very wrong informations about our great leader MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATURK who dedicated his own life for his country and people.
If you make just some overview to history books which were written by some foreigner author, you will understand how the changes took into places in the way of modern Turkish country.
I warn you up to be more clear and more correct! There will be so many more childeren who will see Atatürk as their HERO!!!

 

ZORBA

1:58 PM ET

April 1, 2011

BE CAREFUL WITH YOUR HISTORY INFORMATION!

Dear Sir/Madam;

It is very unfortunate to read this article which contain some very wrong informations about our great leader MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATURK who dedicated his own life for his country and people.
If you make just some overview to history books which were written by some foreigner author, you will understand how the changes took into places in the way of modern Turkish country.
I warn you up to be more clear and more correct! There will be so many more childeren who will see Atatürk as their HERO!!!

 

DUYGUSAVAS

3:03 PM ET

April 1, 2011

You can not call MUSTAFA

You can not call MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATURK as a dictator, due to the fact that he rescued the Turkish nation from imperial occupation after World War 1 and founded a democratic, secular republic. YOU OWE AN APOLOGY TO TURKISH NATION!!!

 

DUYGUSAVAS

3:14 PM ET

April 1, 2011

WHO PAID YOU TO PUT ATATURK ON THIS LIST

You can not call MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATURK as a dictator, due to the fact that he rescued the Turkish nation from imperial occupation after World War 1 and founded a democratic, secular republic. YOU OWE AN APOLOGY TO TURKISH NATION!!!

 

DUYGUSAVAS

3:14 PM ET

April 1, 2011

WHO PAID YOU TO PUT ATATURK ON THIS LIST

You can not call MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATURK as a dictator, due to the fact that he rescued the Turkish nation from imperial occupation after World War 1 and founded a democratic, secular republic. YOU OWE AN APOLOGY TO TURKISH NATION!!!

 

PARSLEY

5:39 PM ET

April 1, 2011

Thanks!!!

Finally someone says "The king is naked!" He was a dictator.

Thank you Charles Homans

 

KORAY3206

5:49 PM ET

April 1, 2011

maurice duverger

I guess, the author of the article and the authors of the comments bottom of the article considers the single party state regime to stipulate Ataturk as a dictator or an autocrat.

Mr. Homans, I do not have any knowledge about what your research field or education is but let me illuminate the status of the Republic of Turkey in point of Maurice Duverger's view while simplifying it to help you to understand the issue.

Maurice Duverger, who is an esteemed politic scientist, makes a distinction to explain how a single party regime can be applied in a country. According to Duverger:

1. In a totalitarian regime
2. In an autocrat regime
3. or in a situation which statesman are obliged to apply it because of pragmatical affairs.

Persuant to Duverger, Turkey applied it because of the pragmatical affairs. Status forces the state inasmuch as the people has no idea how a democratic state can functions. It may seem senceless but let me embody it. When the Soviet Union was decomposed, some parties appeared ridiculuosly such as beer lovers party so on. The process of passing to a democratic state is very difficult which was impossible when Ataturk was alive.

As you see, Duverger does not consider the regime of Turkey between 1923-1950 as a totalitarian or autocrat regime. He chooses Turkey as an example of the third condition in his distinction.

I have no idea how you could take Ataturk into account together with Hitler, Stalin etc. It can be seen that some readers of the magazine and Mr. Homans himself thinks, they are much more knowledgeable than this reputable politic scientist. FP is no more than an ordinary magazine which is interested in only its circulation any more in my eyes.

Furthermore, totally distinct from the issue of article, I saw some comments mentioning about so-called genocide commited by Turkey. Their passion to call the Greeco-Turkish War as an genocide is weird basicly without no reliable document or record. A comment saying that everybody knows that Turks slauthered Armenians. It is horrible to see such a comment condemning a whole nation in an ignorant manner. While you are accusing a nation with a horrible crime against humanity, you cannot ignore many reputable Historians denying the genocide. Read books of Stanford Shaw, Halil Inalc?k, Ilber Ortayl? and so on.

 

PARSLEY

6:03 PM ET

April 1, 2011

Thanks!!!

Finally someone says "The king is naked!" He was a dictator.

Thank you Charles Homans

 

SELCUKBR

12:24 AM ET

April 2, 2011

Any man can make mistakes,

Any man can make mistakes, but only an idiot like you persists in his error.

 

EMREY?LMAZ

6:48 PM ET

April 1, 2011

soysuz kopek satilmis kürtler bekleyin

lan anani avradini kopekler siksin senin. askere geliyorum bekle beni magaranda.inadina doguyu isticem soyunu sopunu katledicem . Atamiza kufrettigin o dilini ellerimle cekip koparicam soysuz pic!hangi magaraya girerseniz girin sizi canli canli gomcez igrenc yaratiklar. orksunuz lan alayiniz.

all of kurdish terrorists look like orks and goblins. don't worry we ll kill em all!!

ALLAH TURK'U KORUSUN ve YUCELTSIN

 

EMREY?LMAZ

6:52 PM ET

April 1, 2011

parsley

seninde sulaleni sikiyim anasini siktimin evladi. sizden kac tane varsa yokedicez. unutmcaz bu ihanetlerinizi.hain serefsiz picler. bunlara yaltaklik yapin siz simdi.karinizi kizinizi peskes cekin bunlara. aldiginiz nefes haram sizin!

 

CENGAW

12:08 AM ET

April 2, 2011

he also have tweet with picture

http://twitter.com/#!/chashomans.

he even dont have idea what he is writing. i belive he had a bad carrier. and he just play with turkish people.

 

VAKANUVIS

12:29 AM ET

April 2, 2011

Nice try at disinformation. Outrageous trolling.

In turkish we have a saying "You can't smear the Sun with clay"; meaning the facts speak for themselves and any attempt to discredit them thus ultimately fails..

On the part of FP, which as an influential magazine would never do something without thinking beforehand, this can hardly be a mistake but rather a deliberate attempt to enrage the turkish populace and those who know the truth of things around the world.

Why?

Zbigniew Brzezinski, former US National Security Advisor, wrote something along the lines of this in his book "The Grand Chessboard":

" Eurasia is the center of global politics; thus whoever controls Eurasia controls the world. Therefore it is imperative that no Eurasian challenger emerge to create competition for the US. "

This is why we hear every single day:
"Turks killed Armenians a looong time ago!"
"Istanbul was a Greek city!"
"Kurds are being oppressed all the time!"

Wake up, people!
Be smart!

By fighting with each other, all we do is create oppurtunity for the imperialists. It is irrelevant that my great-great-grandfather killed your great-great grandfather. Whatever happened, happened in the past, and how does that make us, the people alive today responsible for their deeds? Just because we share an ethnicity? We are all unique individuals, responsible for our own actions alone. Seriously? Who in their right mind would believe such dumbfounded BS!

I recently heard someone put things clearly, saying that the 20th century, with all its modernity, technology etc, skipped by the nations of Africa and the Middle East; which is why the upheaval runs amok today. Because they are demanding dignity. Whose fault is this? Those poor people's or.. those that support autocratic dictators who rule them?

This double standard which allows democracy and freedom to be preached on one hand, yet support bloody dictators with all their might, as long as the oil flows on the other hand must come to an end. Enough is enough, people are not stupid. Everybody deserves dignity and respect, not just the rich and powerful elite.

Ataturk, as I am sure that Mr. Homans and anybody at FP very well knows but somehow chooses to ignore, is one of those rare people that successfully brought that dignity and respect to the masses. His place is those among the liberators of humanity, with the likes of Gandhi, John Locke, Voltaire.

Not with the oppressors or mass murderers of history, of which there are countless.

Maybe this is how you satisfy yourselves and try to avenge your failed carve up attempt of anatolia during WW1, by reducing the acts of a great man to what the shape of his moustache resembles. How more childish can you get, I wonder?

Turkey in its modern history went through 4 coups-de-etat; in 1960, 1971, 1980 and 1997. (The one in 1980 a confirmed US backed coup) If it were not for these setbacks, with the momentum given by Ataturk; it could have surprassed its current situation tenfold and perhaps become the US of the region. Just think about it.

 

BOFARIS

12:50 AM ET

April 2, 2011

Not the full list yet

I have 2 more to add:

1- Husin Mubarak: he is one of them but he has no mustache!

2- Ahmadi Nejjad: he is one of them, and he has a mustach!

 

BRADWIL51

3:26 AM ET

April 2, 2011

sue'em!!!

i think The Turks in USA should sue the FP and its ''writer'' , i am sure we will beat them in court , after all, what facts can they calim to justify their ignorance about MUSTAFA KEMAL ATATURK ??

please sue them and make them apologize us !!!!

..and i am sure some people in usa will say there is freedom in usa..
yes there is freedom everywhere, but this does not mean you can insult and swear my family , like the father of Turks !!!

 

KURDO

7:51 AM ET

April 2, 2011

Turklere

Butun kufurlerinizin on katini size iade ediyorum. Heppinizin anasini sikeyim, ulan pic kurulari kufurden baska bir sey ögrenmediniz mi? Ataturkun agzina sictim, o zubeyda "hanimin" amina siktim. ali riza efindinin götune siktim. Anitkabirinize sictim. Heppinizin bacilarina siktim, heppnizin annelrini gözlerinizin önunde sikecegim. Ulan oruspu cocuklari, kahpe evlatlari. Ataturkun agzina sictim, onun anasina siktim, bacina siktim, babasina siktim, milletine siktim. Heppiniz benim kahpelerimsiniz, butun turk kadinlari azten kahpe oruspu. Ulan sizi sikymeyen kalmade kahpe picleri.

 

TURKER

3:45 PM ET

April 2, 2011

AMCIK BEY?NL?

Sen de ne yarrak varm?? be! Ke?ke e??ek siki kadar yarra??n olaca??na, biraz daha geli?mi? bir beynin olsayd? . Unutma e??e?inkisinin uzun olmas?, onu e??ek olmaktan ç?kartm?yor. Bu kadar sap?k fikirli olduna göre, SEN OLSA OLSA KEND? ANANI- BACINI S?KM??S?ND?R. Senin boynuna "SAPIK ORUSPU ÇOCU?U" diye bir yafta as?p öyle dola?t?rmak laz?m sokaklarda.
Ne yapt?k lan sana, besleyip, yedirip içirmekten ba?ka, nankör. Sewn en yak?n pisikiyatri poliklini?ine ba?vurup tedavi olmaya çal??. Herhalde seni zincirlerle ba?l? en az?l? hastar?n ko?u?una alacaklard?r. Oradan da kolay kolay ç?kabilece?ini sanm?yorum.

 

IGNORANT CHARLES

5:04 PM ET

April 2, 2011

bilgili kurtler bunlarrr :D

Nasil da guzel konusuyorsun turkceyi demekki sike sike ogretmisiz sana... Nasil da ogretmisiz atamizin annesini babasini kendisini hayatini hepsini ezbere biliyorsun. Lakin sana apoyu sorsam anasi kim babasi kim desem? bi bok bilmezsin sende haklsiin...ne anasi belli ne babasi orospu cocugunun :D:D:D:D:D

 

TURKER

2:04 PM ET

April 3, 2011

AMCIK BEYINLI NANKOR KURDO

Sen de ne yarrak varmis be! Keske essek siki kadar yarragin olacagina, biraz daha gelismis bir beynin olsaydi . Unutma esseginkisinin uzun olmasi, onu essek olmaktan çikartmiyor. Bu kadar sapik fikirli olduna göre, SEN OLSA OLSA KENDI ANANI- BACINI SiKMiSSNDiR. Senin boynuna "SAPIK ORUSPU ÇOCUGU" diye bir yafta asip öyle dolastirmak lazim sokaklarda.
Ne yaptik lan sana, besleyip, yedirip içirmekten baska, nankör. Sen en yakin pisikiyatri poliklinigine basvurup tedavi olmaya çal?s. Herhalde seni zincirlerle bagli en azili hastarin kogusuna koyacaklardir. Oradan da kolay kolay çikabilecegini sanmiyorum.
Acil sifalar diliyorum.

 

PEER SYLVERSTATT

6:12 PM ET

April 3, 2011

@KURDO

You my friend should explore the historian happenings, before you poste such a disturbing and insulting posting.
And even in the manner of Turkish language, you made so many mistakes, that I can’t help myself to inform you about you’re bad and unhelpful grammar.

I am not Turkish, but even me had to understand, how bad and insulting your language is.
Further I am asking myself, why a Kurdish guy is so destructive, belonging to this article.
Because if you look at the historical events, than you can’t deny, that the happenings had a lot of more to do with Kurdish citizens in that region, than with the Turkish.

And it’s for me a miracle, how a Kurdish guy, could more sympathize with the Armenian than the Turkish, If someone should just look at the events of 1915.

Maybe you didn’t know it, or for what reason ever.

I try to tell it you in a summery sentence. The Armenian tried to wipe out the villages of Kurds, for fulfilling their dream of Armenian Empire, for the cost of Kurdish people in that region.
And I doubt it really, that you could live in peace, like you do today under the Turkish government now.
If you don’t believe me, look at the occasions in Nagorno-Karabakh in near history.
What can I tell you more?

 

EMREY?LMAZ

9:52 AM ET

April 2, 2011

lan gotten cikma kürt

senin anani zekeriya beyaz siksin . irkinin mahsülüsün belli. ama kökünüzü kurutucaz serefsizler. kürdistan istiyosunuz dimi siz merak etmeyin hepinizi gömecek kadar topragimiz var seklini siktimin pislikleri.

 

HAKAN BEY

11:32 AM ET

April 2, 2011

wait a second

Dear Kurdo

First of all this is a american site, that means you should write in english.
Second thing dont change the subject of this topic, this has nothing to do with nationless uneduacated ignorant and dump people like you.
To curse in a language which country you dont like and to dont mention facts shows what liar you kurds really are. You make your people even look more worst then they already are. If you jealous i feel sorry for you, but theirs still no reason to curse and to lie. You should educate yourself and than talk but if you want to play the "hardcore badass guy" than say your curses in a turks face. Behind the computer, where you in security, everybody can act hard.
You nothing more than a internet gangs :) Get a Life!

 

I LOVE LA

12:27 PM ET

April 2, 2011

best wishes from turkey...

you american people always think you know everything very well.. but after that assey an how can you give say that stupid ideas essay i really dont know..
but i request you write essays about what your army doing in afganistan what your army doing in iraq.. how your fat people american generation live..

please write articles like these subjects..

please stop talking about the other countries.. please..

i am begging you.. because you are so stupid..

please leave the world alone...

move to moon you stupid americans please..

we are begging you.. move the world alone... it will be better without you..

just leave bob dylan back.. and leave.. please..

 

ULANAYI

2:13 PM ET

April 2, 2011

to all turkish natiol idiots

Disgusting comments from the turks show how infected their minds are,
Germans and Russians have left their butchers long ago, but turks still live a few hundred years back in time.
Possibly turks are not from this world or dont belong to human species.

 

HAKAN BEY

2:36 PM ET

April 2, 2011

No racism alowed!

Dear Ulunayi

Possibly you uneducated, racist or you just cant read.
Why you dont call the comments against the turks as disgusting, mhh probably you like them thats why! Racism doesnt bring you anywhere you should bring up facts not insults, with that you just show how dump you and your people are. Learn to read and to know what is right and wrong than come back and argue like a grown man...but i thing idiots like you will never change!

 

ULANAYI

1:46 AM ET

April 3, 2011

Tuirkeys racism today is more than that of 1939 Germany

Todays Turkey thanks to idiots like you is a torture and
murder state, this state is torturing and killing even 12 year
old children and woman and aged, there is no other country
with over 100 000 torture cases; not even in Iran or Sudan or China.

 

TURK972

5:18 PM ET

April 2, 2011

Lale'nin adresi asagidaki gibidir...twitter account'u var..

resmini goren zaten uzerine sumugunu atmaz...

http://twitter.com/chashomans

Bu lale bu adreste....bu adami depresyona sokmak lazim...yorumlara devam....rating artacakmis artmayacakmis diye bir dusunce garip kaliyor....
geceleri uykusu kacsin pezevengin...sabah kapidan karsilarlar beni diye....
muhtemelen aksami erkek arkadasinin yaninda gecirir bu LALE...

I would shit in this guys mouth and duct tape it really good....

 

TURK972

5:32 PM ET

April 2, 2011

Lale'nin dediklerine

Lale'nin dediklerine bakin....tweeter account'indan alinmistir...

As much as I'm enjoying my vast new Turkish readership, I don't get the sense that most of them actually read what I wrote.

Kalin kafali diye buna derler herhalde....

 

TURK972

5:46 PM ET

April 2, 2011

ULANAYI................AYIIIIIIIIIIII..

ULANAYI...
best advice I can tell you is to go and make love to your self....whatever nation you are out of...is the question... thus your comments can make sense..why dont you tell us all so we know....

What this clown writes is not disgusting but angered, upset Turks comments are disgusting....

we are proud to be Turk... and will continue to be... since you dont indicate your nationality it must be an insignificant one.... the one takes a lot of balls to the face...or similar acts of human behaviour....(since we are hot human I did go ahead and excluded ourselves..so that you know)...

 

ULANAYI

1:48 AM ET

April 3, 2011

Todays Turkey thanks to

Todays Turkey thanks to idiots like you is a torture and
murder state, this state is torturing and killing even 12 year
old children and woman and aged, there is no other country
with over 100 000 torture cases; not even in Iran or Sudan or China.

 

JONATHANRAS

6:27 PM ET

April 2, 2011

Ataturk killer and dictator

Ataturk was a dictator and a killer. Its ufortunate to see many Turks attacking an independent writer but after all Turks are not used to freedom and freedom of expression. Ataturk is protected by law and no one can criticize anything he has done. Possibly he is the only history figure protected by such law. If he is such a great figure of all time why do you need such law to protect him? Western countries have by passed the human rights violations and killings Ataturk and Turkish state has comitted for years. Its time for truth.

 

KARANLIK

8:23 PM ET

April 2, 2011

If Ataturk was a dictator, what about Einstein?

How come Einstein had a decision to sent a letter to Ataturk for asking a help to save his people from Hitler?. Is there anybody says Hitler did not kill? Is there anybody thinks that Einstein was a stupid and never know Ataturk was also another dictator and killer?

Anyway....

Whatever you say and believe does not change the fact!

Just read the letter in the following pages. Don't say anything, it is what it was/is! You can not change the reality.

http://www.cankaya.edu.tr/duyuru/einstein_en.php

http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/8529/mektupn.gif

 

KARANLIK

8:20 PM ET

April 2, 2011

If Ataturk was a dictator, what about Einstein?

How come Einstein had a decision to sent a letter to Ataturk for asking a help to save his people from Hitler?. Is there anybody says Hitler did not kill? Is there anybody thinks that Einstein was a stupid and never know Ataturk was also another dictator and killer?

Anyway....

Whatever you say and believe does not change the fact!

Just read the letter in the following pages. Don't say anything, it is what it was/is! You can not change the reality.

http://www.cankaya.edu.tr/duyuru/einstein_en.php

http://img37.imageshack.us/img37/8529/mektupn.gif

 

EXMOD 27

1:17 AM ET

April 3, 2011

perspectives

I am an American I have the utmost respect for Ataturk and for Turks in general. Turkish soldiers fought well in Korea and American Generals thought very highly of them. However I can see how a Kurd, or a "mountain Turk" as they were called in the 20s and 30s, or a Greek, might disagree with the notion that Ataturk wasn't a dictator or autocratic. But for Turks, and as an example for all the former possessions of the Ottoman Empire, Ataturk was a shining example of leading his people out of the swamp of superstition and true despotism and onto clearer and higher ground. He was an extraordinary leader and a product of his times. Turkey, and the world in general, is far better that he lived. You can not say the same for Hitler, Stalin or the rest of that vile humanity and therefore he should not, even in jest, be included in that infamous company. Don't include all Americans with the brush of ignorance or you are no better than the author of this article.

 

ULANAYI

1:48 AM ET

April 3, 2011

Todays Turkey thanks to

Todays Turkey thanks to idiots like you is a torture and
murder state, this state is torturing and killing even 12 year
old children and woman and aged, there is no other country
with over 100 000 torture cases; not even in Iran or Sudan or China.

 

ULANAYI

1:48 AM ET

April 3, 2011

Todays Turkey thanks to

Todays Turkey thanks to idiots like you is a torture and
murder state, this state is torturing and killing even 12 year
old children and woman and aged, there is no other country
with over 100 000 torture cases; not even in Iran or Sudan or China.

 

HAKAN BEY

6:14 AM ET

April 3, 2011

What about your country?

You should look at your own country or people first, bevor you talk about others. I dont know where you from but as an Armenian, Greek or Kurd you should stay back, because they had also many crimes against humanism or especially against muslim minoretties. You have no idea about turkey when you thing turkey is racist! You just should look at the politician partys and you should try to compare Turkey with other countries, than you will see, which countries in the world are the real racists, but because you dont like turkey it is hard for you to see that there are many other countries, which are alot more racist than turkey.

 

HAKAN BEY

6:29 AM ET

April 3, 2011

Thank you very much!

Dear EXMOD 27

Thank you very much for you understanding and your recognition of the great history that America and Turkey had together, especially because of atatürk.
I am apologizing in the name of all turks if they insult america in their comments, which is very wrong, their possibly a little bit blinded by their hate to the author.
America will be always seen as a friend of turkey and as a protector of democracy and humanism. Therefore i hope that the relationship between Turkey and America will get better in the future and will stay forever.

Peace and Love from Turkey to America!

 

AKKAN

7:51 AM ET

April 3, 2011

Ulanayi , Turkish republic

Ulanayi ,
Turkish republic did not torture or killed anybody . This is your provacation . To say idiot to all people of Turkey is real racism behaviour that this explanation belongs to you . Greeks are tortured and killed like over the 1.000.000 people in Izmir . At the same time , greece, who occupied turkish island in agean see have been still torturing turks in western thrace . Armenian idiots killed and raped too many people in word war one .What ever you said ,this actuality will never change . You are fascist who addicted to lose .Do you feel like from europe as if you have blue eyes and yellow hair .Don't be rediculous .That's enough . Firstly ,try to find where you from after we can talk too many things . You are big lier comes from your turkish hostility .

 

ULANAYI

12:11 PM ET

April 3, 2011

Todays Turkey

What about the mass killings, burning down kurdish towns and mass
deportation of millions since 1985?
The ones that torture and murder for the turkish state are insane,
the rest that make propaganda are idiots because they think they can
distort everything, the turkish way means: inside crime-outside propaganda.

 

ULANAYI

12:50 PM ET

April 3, 2011

Ridiculous in every aspect,

Ridiculous in every aspect, no need to say this whole is nonsens, for example
400 000 greek and armenian habitants of this one city were mostly woman and children since the man were collected in turkish concentration camps and were killed, and these
woman and children killed 1 000 000 turks who were mostly fully armed.
Find new lies, these are not acceptable

 

ULANAYI

12:10 PM ET

April 3, 2011

Todays Turkey

What about the mass killings, burning down kurdish towns and mass
deportation of millions since 1985?
The ones that torture and murder for the turkish state are insane,
the rest that make propaganda are idiots because they think they can
distort everything, the turkish way means: inside crime-outside propaganda.

 

PSYLOCKE

12:41 PM ET

April 3, 2011

are you out of your mind?

Turkey is a country where lots of mixed origin live in and I'm one of them. Mustafa Kemal Atatürk is NOT deserved put on that dictator list he was not a dictator he is the founder of secular Rebuplic of Turkey !

please go and read history

yeah there was a time the wars taken place in there and lots of people died. there might be thousands of deaths but turks has lost their own people too as well as other nations france armenian greek and so... their armies forced turks

so what do u expect when these countries attack turks just sit and watch? turks defend themselves as they should do!

just show me which country has a graveyard for their enemies' soldiers???

Turkey has!!! they give them honour ...even their enemies... (go read gallipolli !

sum up he is not deserved to put on that list as titled dictator!!! He was a great commander and first president of current Republic of Turkey and served many years for this land honourably

You people didn't see what had happened at that time and you just listen what your grandpa said and I'm sure lots of people has the idea about Turkey by watching midnight express

go search and read!

 

PEER SYLVERSTATT

7:42 PM ET

April 3, 2011

Atatürk means the father of the turks

And it is a new found entitlement for the great giving’s this man did to his own people.
In this article he is post mortem accused of being a dictator.

That is more than ridiculous!

Who is Homans that he could claim that?

Please Mr. Homan express yourself, that we could understand, why you set Atatürk in a row of real dictators at the first place.

This is not just simply stupid, it is shameless, tasteless and an unforgiveable shame to the services, this man did to his country.

This man didn’t just save the Turkish nation of vanishing;
He introduced the Latin alphabet for the Turkish language, he introduced democracy including women's suffrage since 1921,
and one of his greatest inventions, was to create secularism, which was guaranteed by the strongest army in Europe.
This is more than the so called developed countries in Europe today like Germany, had ever could done himself.
Turkey struggled through democracy within his absolute own force against all obstacles, in the sake of this one man.

And this was the legacy of Mr. Mustafa Kemal Atatürk first Prime Minister of Turkey.
So my question is to the author Mr. Homan of this article is, why should someone like Mr. Kemal do that?

This makes no sense!

Or does it for you?

 

RMDUENAS

11:47 AM ET

April 4, 2011

Cool down

The title of the article mentions dictators. Most probably, Homans did not assign the title. If reading with the brain and not with the stomach (or the heart), it is easy to see that Homans never mentions anything about a dictator in what he wrote about Attaturk. He refers to an "autocratic ruler" to describe him. I do agree that he missed a few more "representative" moustached figures such as Porfirio Diaz, Augusto Pinochet, Jorge Rafel Videla, and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, among others. He could also write an article about beards, too (Fidel Castro would head the list), but it seems that a few FP readers have not much sympathy for this type of so-called superfluous analysis.

 

KARANLIK

8:49 PM ET

April 5, 2011

To RMDUENS - You think you are smarter than any body else here?

...or you think that the others are stupid?

In Turkish we say that "Your excuse is much more worse than your flaw".

I am very sure that you do not even know where Turkey is. Sorry! This is you. We do know very well the people like you who believes himself that he knows more and is better than others...

Now, tell me how possible changing forever the destiny of a nation whose literacy was 5% in average? At the moment the literacy of the population is over 90%. Do you think that the dictator (?) wanted the people whom he dictates be more aware and wake up?

If you want to know much more about the incredible story, just simply take a visit to the following websites and read. I am again sure that your opinion will not change, but at least you will know more and take a breath before saying anything about others.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mustafa_Kemal_Atat%C3%BCrk

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atat%C3%BCrk%27s_Reforms

http://www.allaboutturkey.com/reform.htm

 

LBELIEVEOURFATHERATATURKISDICTATORDOYOUKNOWWHYYYY

9:44 PM ET

April 9, 2011

My commet of this subject; He was BIGDictator let me tell u why!

New goverment follows same procedure because there is a isolation with army in Turkey since Ataturk. Because him lots of people dead like Armenian,Turks and Kurds,Alevi`s. He changed people surnames,their religion,village names,cultures what a pity still this game going well in Turkey.Because people do not know real history.They hide all documents and people not know anything about Ataturk. They keep busy people with economy or students with exams and media,football e.t.c
So my opinion is one of the hero Dictator but cover himself very well because we do not 1 gram brain.So sorrry but this is what l think.
We are uncultured, uneducated people because of system and their player before and now :-((((((
Maalesef bizler; Saygisiz,dinlemeyi bilmeyen,soylenenleri arastirmadan dogru diye kabul eden,agzi bozuk,milliyetci radikal,hava atmayi seven,birbirimizin herseyine goz diken,dusunceye saygi duymayan,lumpen insanlar haline getirilmisiz lakin bunun farkina varabilecek kapasitemiz yok edilmis ve evcillestirilmisiz. ARTIST bir milletizzzzz.Dunyayi gezdim ama kendi ulkemizde dahil hic bir yerde sevilmeyen bir millet oldugumuzu gordum ve hissetim neden because we have got BLACK HISTORYYYY.

 

KUMHO

3:01 AM ET

April 12, 2011

Kumho

Are you crazy? Atatürk is flight commander.Parça Kontör Everybody see it. Your commandant to take on board to. I think you must ascertain. I to feel pity for you. Somebody bilk you..

 

BLOGAS

11:32 AM ET

April 25, 2011

His only goal is to keep the

His only goal is to keep the Turkey undivided, independent and clean from occupant enemies. And he scarified his life and body for the people of Turkey. He is the 2nd holiest man in my life after Muhammed Mustafa. He wants his people always educated, good in science and technology and in for all social activities

 

CARRY RUDEN

2:36 PM ET

April 29, 2011

Stiff Upper Lip

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad may have shaved off his mustache, but it's going to take a whole lot more than that to convince the world that he's not a dictator. FP investigates the whiskers that autocrats wear. Lol another history ''expert'' lets start to discuss about natives than we will go to Asia than Middle east? And elections i believe you must check about ''elections'' cause hitler elected too also about fairy tales please check www. tallarmeniantale. com. "Nearly every aspect of the father of modern Turkey's life was freighted with historical significance, and his upper lip was no exception. The soaring mustache Ataturk wore as a young army captain (above, in 1907) was popular in the Ottoman era, modeled on the grooming style of Kaiser Wilhelm II, which reflected the influence of German culture on the Turkish intelligentsia of the period criminal records. But by the time Ataturk took office as the autocratic ruler of the new Republic of Turkey in 1923, his mustache had been pared back to a conservative bristle; as he guided Turkey toward economic and political liberalization in the years that followed he shaved it off entirely, as a symbolic example of Turkey leaving behind its Ottoman past in favor of a modern future. " My real wory is how this magazine come down to your level and took you serious enough, to give this opportunity of self advertising. If you are really looking for a person lower than yourself by defaming it in order to elevate yourself, look no further than yourself; you are the perfect example of even lower than the lowest. One deffinately would be ashamed to cary the identy you have.