The Two Faces of Libya's Rebels

The anti-Qaddafi forces are a strange mix of ragtag fighters and defector technocrats. And more than guns, the latter desperately need Western moral support.

BY JASON PACK | APRIL 5, 2011

If you let strangers know that you research Libya for a living, there seems to be only one question on their minds: "Who are the Libyan rebels?" I've been asked it at cocktail parties, on ski lifts, at academic seminars, and even by Western journalists in Benghazi who have developed the flattering habit of Skype-ing me at odd hours. Americans seem captivated by this question, perhaps because they have heard senior U.S. officials from Defense Secretary Robert Gates to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to various Republican congressmen proclaim that they do not yet know enough about who the rebels are. I do not take such statements at face value. U.S. statesmen know quite well who the rebels are -- but pretend otherwise to obscure the fact that the United States has yet to formulate a comprehensive policy toward them.

The rebels consist of two distinct groups: the fighters and the political leadership.

First, the fighters. In the prologue to the Libyan uprising, prior to mid-February, most of the peaceful demonstrators were young people inspired by what they saw in neighboring Tunisia and Egypt. As the situation has evolved, elements willing to risk their lives to remove Muammar al-Qaddafi from power have come to embody the spirit and the legitimacy of the rebel movement. These fighters are a ragtag bunch of men of all ages and degrees of military training riding pickup trucks around the eastern coastal desert. You have probably seen pictures of them triumphantly showing the "V"-for-victory hand signal as they move westward and fleeing in unorganized columns when they retreat eastward. What you may not have realized (unless you too get woken up by those random Skype calls from Ajdabiya) is that the vast majority of these fighters have never actually arrived at the front and are not contributing to the rebels' effective fighting strength. Such organization as there is tends to be on the unit level only, and this does not facilitate the formation of an effective line of battle.

The units with the highest degree of organization are former Libyan army battalions that were stationed in eastern Libya, also known as Cyrenaica. These units, including those led by former Interior Minister Abdul Fattah Younis al-Abidi, defected en masse in mid-February, retaining their organizational structure. Bizarrely, these units are largely absent from the current fighting. It is unclear why.

The next most organized units are those composed of bearded men with Islamist leanings. These fighters are likely to be from certain cities -- most famously Darnah -- and of certain backgrounds, such as unemployed men with university degrees. Some have attended Salafi seminaries; a smaller proportion have trained together secretly in Libya. A minuscule inner core fought in Afghanistan alongside Osama bin Laden in the 1980s and created the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) upon their return to Libya in the early 1990s. That group's raison d'être was to violently overthrow Qaddafi. After failed putsch attempts at the end of the 1990s, the Libyan state effectively crushed and co-opted the LIFG during the 2000s. Over the last five years, prominent former LIFG leaders have renounced their previous ties to al Qaeda and articulated an innovative anti-extremist Islamic theology. As the Wall Street Journal's Charles Levinson, who has met with prominent former LIFG elites in Darnah, has reported, "Islamist leaders and their contingent of followers represent a relatively small minority within the rebel cause. They have served the rebels' secular leadership with little friction. Their discipline and fighting experience is badly needed by the rebels' ragtag army."

Although hard-core Islamists are likely to remain bit players politically in the rebel movement, it would be unrealistic to expect Islam not to play a significant role in post-Qaddafi Libya. Much of eastern Libya remains traditional and religiously conservative. Adherence to the Senussi Sufi order served as the defining social, religious, and political lodestar of the Cyrenaicans from the mid-19th century until 1969, after which point Qaddafi suppressed them. Indeed, because Qaddafi excluded all conservative Muslim sensibilities from having a say in politics after 1969, Muslim groups must be granted their rightful seat at the table from now on.

Islam has always served to unite disparate tribal, social, and regional groupings in Libya. In Qaddafi's wake, assuming he falls, we can expect moderate Islam to be a key rhetorical factor in both popular discourse and politics. This should not frighten Western observers, as the use of Islam as a uniting, stabilizing factor will be a bane to jihadi recruitment efforts.

ODD ANDERSEN/AFP/Getty Images

 

Jason Pack is a researcher of Libya at St. Antony's College, Oxford University. He has worked in both Tripoli and Washington, D.C., on strengthening the U.S.-Libya relationship.

JBWFOTO

12:21 PM ET

April 6, 2011

Know your rebels

In the Sinjar Records captured in 2007 along the Syrian/Iraq border was found documents of all foreign jihadists entering Iraq for al Qaeda. They were listed by name, home country, country of origin, and how they got to Iraq.
Out of the 700 records that didn't get destroyed, the number one group of foreign fighters were from Saudi Arabia––no surprise. Number two with a bullet was from Libya, specifically Darnah.
Those from Darnah might have been fighting alongside bin Laden in the 80's but they were fighting for him as late as 2007 in Iraq killing Americans. The stalling by both the White House and the State Department are quite justified. When the American public finds out we are arming and assisting the very people trying to kill us for almost a decade it can't possibly go well.
Now you can tell those using Skype that you really don't have the answers they need. They should leave you alone now.

 

HELLOKITTY200

12:52 PM ET

April 6, 2011

Dont take it personally

regardless of where they were from--the US should not--NOT--have been in Iraq. The world and the US seems to think so. It is not Ok that the Americans killed 100's of thousands of Iraqi civilians for ?????? oh yah, I forgot, for corporate investments. You have to know something, no matter where and what, Muslims will always stand together against criminal activity and oppression. Of course Libyans are going to be over there. If it was Koreans, Russians or Americans they were fighting against, it did not matter. Nobody else was helping the civilians against a war that was waged under false pretenses. Good for them for helping innocent people when it was needed. Remember, the Iraq was was wrong and an injustice.

 

JBWFOTO

1:36 PM ET

April 6, 2011

Don't take it personally

I didn't.

I wasn't justifying Iraq. That wasn't even a corporate war. That was a few simple minded individuals staking out their tantrums on innocent Iraq citizens.

I was simply (sticking to the article) explaining that we do indeed know where the Libyan rebels are from. It was Mr. Pack that was having a hard time identifying them.

 

NATEOMC

4:17 PM ET

April 6, 2011

Small sample size

If I recall, I read that the actual number of Libyan insurgents discovered in that raid was something like 111 mostly from the town of Darnah. The population of Libya is close to 6.5 million. 111 isn't even a drop in the bucket. Most likely what happened is there was a strong recruitment effort by AQ-Iraq in that town by someone or a small group sympathetic to their cause. They are hardly representative of the entire country or the rebel movement.

 

TERRY BRENNAN

12:31 PM ET

April 6, 2011

Stereotypical academics

Mr. Pack does seem to be a stereotypical academic in other ways as well.

He understands his subject, dividing the "who?" question into the "who are the leaders?" and "who are the soldiers?"

He identifies the faction of rebels that is Islamist, and examines their motives and degree of power.

He describes the place of tribe and Islam in the rebels;

He predicts the military success of the rebels, and argues his case persuasively.

He proposes a course of action, and argues his case persuasively.

In short, he has knowledge and insight, and uses them to propose a solution.

I am happy we have academics like this, and wish him good skiing.

 

FEDERALPELLGRANT

12:42 PM ET

April 25, 2011

I like the way you present

I like the way you present the two sides of rebels in Libya.. Young people nowadays are more aggressive to fight there rights and what they want. I've seen the news how the government stand its ground and how the rebels stands there own too. But what makes this more hard to dealt is how the highest official think that they're just okay. Now, they don't even think and recognized how many people died bec. of there military dispersal. Official like this need to be burned. So to the other rebels they need to cut themselves. Look what happen to the economy and the world. federal pell grant

 

FEDERALPELLGRANT

10:05 PM ET

May 2, 2011

We all know in times of

We all know in times of crisis like this, there's the good and the bad. We know exactly what the other rebels want. The power to dominate the other just the justice to have a better future. So, the young should make the change.they had the power to change there country.