What Not to Wear

Five countries where the term "fashion police" is meant literally.

BY SUZANNE MERKELSON, JOSHUA E. KEATING | APRIL 11, 2011

BHUTAN

Sartorial offense: Western clothing

The debate: Bhutan's former King Jigme Singye Wangchuck was so eager to put Buddhist teachings into action that he promoted the metric of "gross national happiness" as an alternative to traditional economic development measures. He also, however, found some less warm and fuzzy ways of preserving traditional Bhutanese culture from what he saw as corrupting outside influences -- among them, draconian restrictions on clothing.

Since 1990, Bhutanese have been required by law to follow the official national dress code, known as Driglam Namzha, in public. For men, that involves a knee-length robe known as a gho. For women, it's a type of ankle-length kimono called a kira. Those caught wearing anything else can be subject to a $3.30 fine, which amounts to three days' wages. The rules are even more specific for civil servants, who must wear sashes of various colors and designs depending on their office. Bhutanese have evolved some bizarre fashion responses to the law, including the briefly in vogue practice of wearing jeans under the gho.

Driglam Namzha is just one of the cultural laws resented by the Hindu Nepalese community in southern Bhutan, which has been persecuted for years by the Bhutanese government.   

Ed Jones/AFP/Getty Images

 

Suzanne Merkelson is an editorial assistant and Joshua E. Keating is an associate editor at Foreign Policy.

MARKNOTHAX

3:47 AM ET

April 12, 2011

Naqab & Burakha

This type of things like woman and girl stop to devlope their self and stop their mental devlopment.

http://www.wellnessstarts.com/ultra-berry-blast-review.html

 

ODYSSEY8

10:57 AM ET

April 12, 2011

No win scenario

I do understand the French government's reasons for doing this; that being said, I think the French government has stepped head-long into a no-win scenario with this issue:

a. If the French government does not impose a burqa ban, and a terrorist uses a burqa to smuggle explosives into a public place and the explosives kill people, the French people will blame their government for not taking sufficient steps to ensure public safety.

b. With the ban now in place, the French government now runs the risk of alienating its own Muslim population (which, by the way, is the largest in Europe), straining relations with Muslim countries and making France a focal point for the ire of Al Qaeda and any other terrorist organization out there looking for a way to "make a name for themselves" in Islamic fundamentalist circles.

Like I said, no win scenario!

 

TROYM

9:31 PM ET

April 12, 2011

Dress code? What's next?

The problem with this story is that France is the only "democracy" listed. It is expected that Authoritarian regions will dictate what can and cannot be worn as a measure of social compliance (much the same way kids at school are expected to wear uniforms).

France is outrageous because of it blatant disregard for the human rights of self expression and religious freedoms. However it is a perfect demonstration of how terrorism is winning the war against liberal democracy by causing it to implode, much like communism did in its competition with democratic capitalism.

 

AND REW

9:47 PM ET

April 12, 2011

What About

What about Iran? There are lots of restrictions, from not wearing pants to certain haircuts, and of course, the typical Islamic restrictions for women.

Also I'm pretty sure the list lacks some other countries as well.

 

BOOKSTER

7:41 AM ET

April 14, 2011

Bhutan info out of date

A minor point in the great scheme of things, I suppose but a friend from Bhutan says: "Bhutanese are required to wear [national dress] to office/work space/places of respect, but they can wear other/western clothing in public. This law (to wear in public) was in effect in 80's not anymore."

 

SHAMS ZAMAN

12:15 PM ET

April 15, 2011

A Classical Example of Hypocrisy

Now that is indeed a classical example of hypocrisy. If one woman has a right of going nude or in bikini at the beach why on the other one is not permitted to wear the clothes of her choice. If anyone wants to cover her face up why she is not permitted to do that? Where is the champions of freedom of expression and liberty??

The only thing western man want is to see the womenfolk naked and quenching the thirst of his sexual hunger and thirst. When it comes to publishing cartoons of sacred personalities of Islam it is regarded as freedom of expression and freedom of speech. But if some Muslim woman want to practice that freedom by putting on veil it is forbidden.

There is no difference between Taliban and French. One prefer to forcefully put it on other forcefully tears it down. shame on the double standards. By this standard French have no right to criticize the Taliban who have forcefully adopted another practice. The concept of freedom in West is slowly going down the drain and this is a significant sign of the decline of the west.No doubt Toynbee had predicted it almost 50 years ago.

Shams Zaman - Pakistan (smszmn72@yahoo.com)

 

EDITH PORTA

11:30 AM ET

May 11, 2011

It is expected that

It is expected that Authoritarian regions will dictate what can and cannot be worn as a measure of social compliance (much the same way kids at school are expected to wear uniforms).France is outrageous because of it blatant disregard for the human rights of self expression and religious freedoms. However it is a perfect demonstration of how terrorism is winning the war against liberal democracy by causing it to implode, much like communism did in its competition with democratic capitalism.If one woman has a right of going nude or in bikini at the beach why on the other one is not permitted to wear the clothes of her choice. If anyone wants to cover her face up why she is not permitted to do that? Where is the champions of freedom of expression and liberty??The only thing western man want is to see the womenfolk naked and quenching the thirst of his sexual hunger and thirst. When it comes to publishing cartoons of sacred personalities of Islam it is regarded as freedom of expression and freedom of speech. But if some Muslim woman want to practice that freedom by putting on veil it is forbidden.