Emerging from the most severe economic downturn in a generation, the United States has a choice: Do we continue to be a global beacon for open markets and economic advancement? Or do we turn inward and abandon our leadership on trade policies, which has been a hallmark of economic growth since the end of World War II? The U.S. Congress will soon have an opportunity to make this choice when President Barack Obama seeks formal approval of our pending free trade agreements with Colombia, Panama, and South Korea.

COMMENTS (0) SHARE:

Twitter

 

Reddit

 

 

More...

The United States' unemployment rate has hovered between 8 and 10 percent for more than two years. Economic insecurity is being felt across the country, with home foreclosures at record highs. Our national debate is centered on the size and scope of federal power and how to confront record spending and debt. In such a context, many view international trade as an assault on American workers rather than the job creator it has historically proved to be.

But the cost of failing to approve these trade agreements is high. It would send a signal that the United States is abandoning the core principles of trade that have helped make it an exemplar of economic freedom and growth. At the same time, these agreements will strengthen America's international competitiveness and spur job creation here at home, without adding to the federal debt.

The opportunity to demonstrate our continued leadership on international trade is now. We need to work together to advance our long-stalled agreements with Colombia, Panama, and South Korea. We can no longer afford to sit on the sidelines. If we don't act now, we risk falling further behind other countries that are forging deals to expand opportunities for their farmers, workers, and job creators.

Our agreement with Colombia is a prime example. In 2008, the United States was the primary supplier of corn, wheat, and soybeans to Colombia, accounting for 71 percent of the market. Today, our market share has dropped to 27 percent. The reason is simple: While our trade pact, first signed in 2006, was collecting dust, other countries stepped in to fill our void.

According to the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC), fully implementing the trade agreements with Colombia and Panama would expand U.S. exports by more than $1 billion a year. Moreover, since the tariffs of Colombia and Panama are significantly higher than those of the United States, these agreements would level the playing field for U.S. exporters. Today, almost all Colombian and Panamanian products enter the United States duty-free through preference programs. In contrast, U.S. products entering the Colombian market face high tariffs of up to 35 percent for industrial goods and up to 388 percent for agricultural products. In Panama, U.S. industrial products get hit with tariffs of up to 81 percent while U.S. agricultural products face tariffs as high as 260 percent. Once entered into force, our trade agreements will eliminate this tariff asymmetry and provide duty-free access for American-made products into Colombia and Panama. This means more jobs for American workers and business expansion for American employers.

12NEXT