The New Geopolitics of Food

From the Middle East to Madagascar, high prices are spawning land grabs and ousting dictators. Welcome to the 21st-century food wars.

BY LESTER R. BROWN | MAY/JUNE 2011

In the United States, when world wheat prices rise by 75 percent, as they have over the last year, it means the difference between a $2 loaf of bread and a loaf costing maybe $2.10. If, however, you live in New Delhi, those skyrocketing costs really matter: A doubling in the world price of wheat actually means that the wheat you carry home from the market to hand-grind into flour for chapatis costs twice as much. And the same is true with rice. If the world price of rice doubles, so does the price of rice in your neighborhood market in Jakarta. And so does the cost of the bowl of boiled rice on an Indonesian family's dinner table.

Welcome to the new food economics of 2011: Prices are climbing, but the impact is not at all being felt equally. For Americans, who spend less than one-tenth of their income in the supermarket, the soaring food prices we've seen so far this year are an annoyance, not a calamity. But for the planet's poorest 2 billion people, who spend 50 to 70 percent of their income on food, these soaring prices may mean going from two meals a day to one. Those who are barely hanging on to the lower rungs of the global economic ladder risk losing their grip entirely. This can contribute -- and it has -- to revolutions and upheaval.

Already in 2011, the U.N. Food Price Index has eclipsed its previous all-time global high; as of March it had climbed for eight consecutive months. With this year's harvest predicted to fall short, with governments in the Middle East and Africa teetering as a result of the price spikes, and with anxious markets sustaining one shock after another, food has quickly become the hidden driver of world politics. And crises like these are going to become increasingly common. The new geopolitics of food looks a whole lot more volatile -- and a whole lot more contentious -- than it used to. Scarcity is the new norm.

Until recently, sudden price surges just didn't matter as much, as they were quickly followed by a return to the relatively low food prices that helped shape the political stability of the late 20th century across much of the globe. But now both the causes and consequences are ominously different.

For More



How Food Explains the World
By Joshua E. Keating

Street Eats

An FP Slide Show

In many ways, this is a resumption of the 2007-2008 food crisis, which subsided not because the world somehow came together to solve its grain crunch once and for all, but because the Great Recession tempered growth in demand even as favorable weather helped farmers produce the largest grain harvest on record. Historically, price spikes tended to be almost exclusively driven by unusual weather -- a monsoon failure in India, a drought in the former Soviet Union, a heat wave in the U.S. Midwest. Such events were always disruptive, but thankfully infrequent. Unfortunately, today's price hikes are driven by trends that are both elevating demand and making it more difficult to increase production: among them, a rapidly expanding population, crop-withering temperature increases, and irrigation wells running dry. Each night, there are 219,000 additional people to feed at the global dinner table.

More alarming still, the world is losing its ability to soften the effect of shortages. In response to previous price surges, the United States, the world's largest grain producer, was effectively able to steer the world away from potential catastrophe. From the mid-20th century until 1995, the United States had either grain surpluses or idle cropland that could be planted to rescue countries in trouble. When the Indian monsoon failed in 1965, for example, President Lyndon Johnson's administration shipped one-fifth of the U.S. wheat crop to India, successfully staving off famine. We can't do that anymore; the safety cushion is gone.

That's why the food crisis of 2011 is for real, and why it may bring with it yet more bread riots cum political revolutions. What if the upheavals that greeted dictators Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali in Tunisia, Hosni Mubarak in Egypt, and Muammar al-Qaddafi in Libya (a country that imports 90 percent of its grain) are not the end of the story, but the beginning of it? Get ready, farmers and foreign ministers alike, for a new era in which world food scarcity increasingly shapes global politics.

Photography by Renée Comet
Styling by Lisa Cherkasky

 SUBJECTS: FOOD/AGRICULTURE
 

Lester R. Brown, president of the Earth Policy Institute, is author of World on the Edge: How to Prevent Environmental and Economic Collapse.

FRED_J9

3:48 AM ET

April 25, 2011

delecious !

yes ksy213, you're absolutely right!! me too i'd rather go to morocco to eat karan see "Oujda Portail" which cost 0,1 cent either spending money on gas , that's not fair !! arabe countries enjoy very cheap food, when we're here, we pay to enjoy breathing Gas ???

 

JACKTOM

1:54 AM ET

May 1, 2011

Because impersonal make rap

Because impersonal make rap beats market forces will be cowed by our catchy slogans!

 

MIKEM1962

9:30 PM ET

May 13, 2011

Prices Increase Wages are not

The brand new geopolitics of food?
That's changing that old geopolitics of oil.
What's going to replace both of them, may be the geopolitics of water that is clean.
Feeling Broke

 

SOMEONE12354

5:32 AM ET

May 18, 2011

I have never read such a long and obviously biased article

The USA helps or helped the world by producing too much food and delivering their overproduction to poor countries??

No, it is not that simple! The USA (and EU too) do not automatically do any good to poor countries doing that!! What are people in developing countries living from? Aren't THEY often farmers who SELL crops rather than buying it with money that seems to come from nowhere in the article.

The USA and the EU only care for their own interests, or rather for the interests of their farmer unions. These countries produce too much food due to subsidies and deliver the surplus to developing countries and ruin the local farmers there. Nestle even managed to kill millions of toddlers with EU subsidized milk.

If we believe it or not - the USA is not better in everything and there are people in poor countries who would be able to produce and sell food if there wasn't the super cheap (and super well marketed) competition from the West.

The higher food prices might be a chance for small farms in developing countries to establish some living. We do not have to write biased articles and send the crap which we do not want to eat to the poor.

 

DELTASEO

4:38 AM ET

April 25, 2011

You should come to the UK

Food prices in the UK have risen massively here in the UK ... some products have even doubled in price in the last couple of years.

Utility bills (water, gas, electricity) have seen massive increases and prompted many underhand practices from companies desperate to householders to switch providers. Old people are conned on the doorstep by ticksy salespeople and everyone is feeling 'the pinch'.

We haven't even talked about petrol (gas) prices ... at approx £1.40 / L we're almost approaching £6 per gallon ... yes, USA, that's over $9 a gallon!!

Still think it's bad there?!!

- DeltaSEO

 

FREDDYRICHMOND92285

1:02 PM ET

April 30, 2011

Totally Agree

It's a bleak situation when things are so bad in your own country. Just how awful it must be in these under-developed countries goodness only knows. It does however always amaze me that every time there is a natural disaster somewhere in the world, we always manage to find a few £100m to help. Why can't we find a few £100m now and build some more hospitals?
-Baby Gifts

 

ERAN

10:06 AM ET

April 25, 2011

Food security

I am in total agreement with Lester's truthful factual analysis. Yet the global media is more concerned with the price of Gold & Silver that cannot be eaten.

Potable Water and fertile Soils are the most important commodities for sustainable survival of human civilization on planet earth in the 21st century.

 

MATT74

9:59 AM ET

May 5, 2011

Eran I think you are spot on

Eran I think you are spot on with this, media likes things that it can make a good headline or thin story out of rather than discussing the true effects of massive increases in some basics, food, water, clothing (cotton's on the rise).

You bring up drinking water and soil - that is a huge concern for some major metropolitan areas, I think residents don't really have any idea of where their water comes from. They just turn on the tap and there it is.

This is a great article and there should be more like it letting others know the true cost of the food increases and the effects felt not just at home but around the world.

 

DRSTUPID

10:08 AM ET

April 25, 2011

An answer from history.

Page 3 : "Will villagers permit trucks laden with grain headed for port cities to proceed when they themselves may be on the verge of starvation?" The answer is yes. The proof is Ukraine 1932-33.

 

NASKNIT

4:33 PM ET

April 25, 2011

Food shortages

Those trucks carrying food away form the people were only able to do so, because the Communist leader at that time had armed soldiers ready to shoot farmers who would not give up their grain.

 

ELSUENODELARAZON

6:03 AM ET

April 28, 2011

Hunger and protest

It is not just the Ukraine 1932-33 or communists with guns. Food and famine research, including that by Nobel economist Amartya Sen, shows quite conclusively that famines are silent, that endemic hunger raises little protest, and that food export is rarely resisted. This has held true around the world across modern times. During the 198-85 Sahelian famine fruit and vegetable exports from Ethiopia and Sudan, amongst others, were at their historically highest point. The 1944 Bengal famine coincided with bumper harvests.

The consensus in food and famie research is, to quote Sen, "Starvation is the characteristic of some people not having enough to eat. It is not the characteristic of there being not enough food to eat." It is often a case of hunger amongst plenty.

Historians have amply demonstrated that famine victims - those, by definition with the weakest access (or entitlement) to food - are politically the least powerful and socially the least capable of organising effective protest. Cargill et.al. have never stopped shipping food because some locals are dying of hunger.

 

BLOGAS

11:10 AM ET

April 25, 2011

We haven't even talked about

We haven't even talked about petrol (gas) prices ... at approx £1.40 / L we're almost approaching £6 per gallon ... yes, USA, that's over $9 a gallon!!!

 

HOUSTONIAN

4:08 PM ET

April 25, 2011

Agreed

My family and I went to Europe for a 2 week vacation and to be honest, we were a little - well, quite a LOT shocked by the prices of everything from food to gas. Everything is increasing while wages and earnings stay roughly the same; definitely not close to the rate prices are increasing. Purchasing power is decreasing - and everyone is feeling the pinch of a simple grocery shopping.

Lately, I have seen people using credit cards to buy groceries. Talk about a bomb waiting to go off. This is a trend that I have not seen talked about - the US in such bad financial shape that people are paying for food with credit cards instead of their debit card or prepaid debit cards. This is the state of the Nation - and I believe that things are going to continue to get WORSE for the general US population.

Blogas, you said, "£6 per gallon ... yes, USA, that's over $9 a gallon!!!" Do you have any idea what would happen to the USA and cost of food if we hit $9.00 per gallon?

I for one will be seriously thinking about a back-up plan on where to relocate my family. The US has been hit hard with high gas and food prices before, but the economy cannot suffer any more blows.

I think that many people are living on borrowed time... and borrowed money when it comes to paying for food. Both of which are going to run out soon. (the time and money, not the food... but you never know.)

 

NASKNIT

4:51 PM ET

April 25, 2011

food prices

It may be getting worse in Europe now, but their food was expensive in June 2008. My husband & I visited mostly Germany- we did see some of Italy, Austria, Switzerland, Belgium, Lichtenstein. When we were in Venice, we went to a Mac Donalds for lunch, just for the novelty. People were standing in lines to get tables. They had exactly 4 Value Meals to choose from. You could refill your drink ONCE. They did have ice (Most restaurants don't, and forget ice water with lemon- does not exist!). We ordered our 2 Value Meals, & got a table. The cost was 15 Euros. The exchange rate was $1.68 per Euro. Lunch cost $25.50 for 2 people. Of course the Euro has a Value Added Tax built in- in Germany it's 20%, Austria's is 19%, I think Italy was 20% also. Jeans were being sold at the Ka-De-We in Germany for 70-120 Euros. Books printed in the USA, with prices in dollars were being sold at the same number, but in Euros. That is, if a book cost $20.00, they were selling it for 20 Euros. Liquor was expensive, too. Sidewalk cafes selling cocktails were also inflated. If a Margarita went for $5.95 in the US, over there it sold for 6.95 Euros. The hotel rooms are really small, unless you want to spend BIG BUCKS. Most of the rooms we stay in had a Queen size bed- there was about 18 inches space to walk on each side & at the foot of the bed. No Air Conditioning, no ice, and most no elevators. It was a lovely place to visit, I would never want to live there. Too crowded. We drove through 2 national parks. The "wild life" we saw (during the entire times we were in Europe) was some pigeons, some ducks, 6 rabbits, & 1 rat. I'll take the USA.

 

BOWDENG

3:37 AM ET

April 26, 2011

we do have ice in europe and,

we do have ice in europe and, indeed, lemon. occasionally combined. not complete barbarians.

macdonalds food prices aren't the issue here (as the end consumer you're almost entirely paying for convenience and whatever added value they can claim, rather than the actual ingredients). +, it's tragic that tourists to venice visit macdonalds :p

 

...

5:23 PM ET

April 26, 2011

americans right?

no one else in their right mind would be so supportive of chain restaurants, or chains period...

 

FJFJFJ

7:03 PM ET

May 6, 2011

Consider Canada

Plenty of excess wheat and gasoline here! It will cost, but at least we'll be the last to go without. And global warming effects might to more harm than good this far north.

 

BLOGAS

11:23 AM ET

April 25, 2011

Old people are conned on the

Old people are conned on the doorstep by ticksy salespeople and everyone is feeling 'the pinch'.

 

WESTA

11:51 AM ET

April 25, 2011

Finally

This article addresses exactly what is wrong with our food system. If any of you have a chance to read a good book, check out Stuffed and Starved by Raj Patel. Very informative.

My advice; invest in a good piece of land and provide your own security!

 

SHELLC0DE

4:26 PM ET

April 25, 2011

man

It seems like everything just keeps raising in price, food, gas, travel, and our economy is still in the gutter. Poster by Stacy Hanson at best cookbooks

 

BUYONLINEKENYA

9:44 AM ET

April 26, 2011

Food and fuel prices a growing problem in Kenya

A world wide problem but some are already dying. It's always been a cause of concern, sadly the management of these problems by some African governments are far worse than other parts of the world. It's very sad to see some of the citizens mostly mothers and children dying (in the northern part of Kenya) because no one is doing enough to prevent this. As it gets worse in the world I wonder how the situation will turn in Kenya.

I think its only by governments working together that we can prevent these situations getting worse, yet in some cases we have so much waste.

The low earners in Kenya are getting about Kshs 100 a day that's about USD 1.20. A packet of milk costs about Kshs 30 and Bread about Kshs 40. Fuel is now selling at about Kshs 110 per litre. Surely, this is very wrong and yet we have most if not all our politicians living large!!!

Large organisations in Kenya like Safaricom make a difference by giving back to the community and changing lives. From the huge profits being made by large organisation its time to give back and make a difference.

Kenya

 

THOMASALMOND

12:43 PM ET

April 26, 2011

prices up

As I remember prices always goes up.. never down.
Everyone should switch to veganism/vegetarianism
And develop compassion and understanding of ego.

 

FFLORES

2:26 PM ET

April 26, 2011

Sugarcane ethanol does not increase the prices of food!

Why every so-called expert on energy or food insists on stating that both corn and sugarcane ethanol cause high food prices?

Corn ethanol certainly does, but this is not true for sugarcane ethanol. During the 2008 food crisis the production of sugarcane ethanol (mainly from Brazil) broke previous records while the sugar prices on international market were on a historic low.

Why insisting on this fallacy?

 

DALLAS WEAVER

2:42 PM ET

April 26, 2011

Food issues

The article misses many very important considerations. There is mention of a slowdown in the rate of increase in yield per Ha. and yield per liter of water, but no mention of using genetic engineering to improve the yield. It is far faster to use genetic engineering to add drought resistance genes than it would be to use selective breeding.

There is little mention that the fungibility of food to fuel (corn to ethanol) goes both ways. It is possible to convert coal to hydrogen or methane, which can then grow single cell protein which can then be used as a feed for fish and shrimp. This is known to work with multiple generations of fish grown on bacteria grown using methane.

Without the silly corn-to-ethanol subsidies, the corn would go into meat production to satisfy the demands of billions of people who are now rich enough to demand meat (the big demand factor), a factor only lightly mentioned.

However, use of grains for meat production is the 900 lb gorilla in this issue. If we used the grains and grain proteins which we currently feed to cows, pigs and chickens for fish feeds consumed by carnivorous marine fish in offshore net pens, the improvement in feed conversion would be astonishing. Huge efficiencies result from shifting from a warm blooded animal that uses energy to stand up and keep warm to a cold blooded animal that needs to use no energy fighting gravity, would give us twice as much meat for the same amount of grain. This shift would satisfy the meat demand for the several billion newly rich people.

As predicable as it is lamentable, the environmental activists NGO's oppose both genetic engineering and offshore aquaculture. They don't know about using coal or natural gas to produce food, but they will probably block any efforts along these lines -- coal and natural gas fracking are both bad, therefore food from that source is bad and not "organic".

If the world does end up in a serious food crisis, perhaps we should put the blame where it belongs, on the Luddite environmental activists' prevention of any technological solutions to the problem.

 

NEWTOSCHOOL

2:54 PM ET

April 26, 2011

Over-populated!

As mentioned in this article, the over-population issue needs to be addressed. I know it's a touchy subject, but why wait until things are dire to face the reality of the situation (assuming things aren't dire now). The saying of "Don't have kids if you can't take care of them" seems to apply in a global context when considering where the parent's food comes from.

 

ELSUENODELARAZON

6:41 AM ET

April 28, 2011

"Over-population" is the

"Over-population" is the crocodile tears of the rich. As MK Gandhi said "The world has enough for everyone's needs but not for everyone's greed."

A poor Kenyan with a family of ten consumes a fraction of that of one rich American or British person. Over population does not mean "too many people" it means "too greedy".

 

DUCKSAWCE49

6:54 PM ET

April 26, 2011

China Running out of Food and Water

Lester Brown, through his Earth Policy Institute newsletter, lays out a scenario that will affect much of the world in the very near future.

Years ago, China was the leading producer of soy. It is now the lagest importer of soy. China switched to more drought tolerant wheat. China is now the leading producer of wheat.

China is running out of water. It is draining a massive acquifer under the North China Plain.It will need wheat imports in the very near future.

If China imports only 20% of its wheat, it will need 80 million tons of imports. The US exports 90 million tons. This leaves 10 million tons , If China needs more than 20%, there will be wheat left over to meet growing world needs.

At present, there is horrifying weather in much of the US grain belt. It remains to be seen how this will affect grain production.

China holds a lot of US debt. The US will have to honor China's food needs before the rest of the world. China, today, announced that it will be buying less US debt. More money will be going into Sovereign Debt , This may mean more purchases of land in underdeveloped countries.

It also mean a higher cost of borrowing for the US, which means global inflation, which means more expensive food.

To sum it all up ''' Lester Brown states we are one bad harvest away from global chaos.

 

THOMAS_PP

1:51 AM ET

April 27, 2011

Adequate food production is not possible in a monetary system

We easily have the scientific knowledge and physical resources to grow enough food. Vegetables can be grown in hydroponic farms. And where water is scarce, desalination plants can be used to create freshwater for crop irrigation.

Changing our means of transportation to rely on truly renewable resources would also greatly help to reduce the price of food. Then crops that could feed people will no longer be used as biofuels.

We have the knowledge and resources to do all this. But the problem is that we do not have enough money to move to renewable energy fast enough. And neither do we have enough of an economic incentive to feed the poorest people.

So if we really do want to solve this rapidly growing disaster at the root, we will need to move into a Resource Based Economy, rather than the current Monetary Based Economy. (Monetary economies include both capitalist and communist systems)

You can read more about a resource based economy here http://www.thezeitgeistmovement.com/joomla/index.php?Itemid=50

And watch a 20-minute introduction here: http://youtu.be/4mkRFCtl2MI

 

CHADG

2:46 PM ET

April 27, 2011

The Economy

With the economy in a downward spiral like this, it's not surprising. More and more companies are relying on what's called the grocery "shrink ray" which is why a product size is reduced. It's becoming more and more common that I see my favorite products getting smaller while the price stays the same.

Did they think I wouldn't notice?

-Chad
Car Insurance Comparison

 

TOPOLOCO

1:42 AM ET

May 1, 2011

the recession

the recession is keep going up, every days the world is a place of hungry."We as consumers - it's been a long time since we've had prices rise as sharply as they are and are likely to in the next several months," said Nancy Sidhu an economist with L.A. Economic Development Center. Many videos cristianos gratis show the high price of the food.Recent government data shows that food makers are preparing to increase their prices and grocery chains are preparing to pass that hike onto consumers.

Shoppers at a local Sherman Oaks grocery chain said the cost of groceries is climbing by the day.

"I think this is crazy," said Gwen Adair. "Everything else is going up as it is and now you go in and it's a certain price and two days later it's gone up. I don't understand."

Prices are expected to climb on products on the store shelves and produce, meats and dairy. Experts said the rising cost of corn, wheat and other commodities is causing the increases in virtually everything we buy. Wheat goes into bread while corn feeds the cows, pigs and chickens.

According to a U.S. Bureau of Labor statistic, prices for fruits and vegetables are up 3 percent, milk 10 percent and beef 13 percent. Officials said the price increases are so noticeable because overall inflation this year has been just over 1 percent.

 

NED

12:22 PM ET

May 1, 2011

Bernanke factor

Rising commodity prices is not only a supply and demand story. Trend of higher food prices will continue as the U.S government intentionally debases the dollar while lying to us the whole time about wanting a "strong currency."

Since last August when the FED announced funny money printing part 2, corn is up 75%. Soybeans are up 35%. In the last 12 months, corn is up 116%.

Commodities are rising faster than a toddler bike seat. A mix of low supplies, tight demand, and crappy weather has sent corn to a record high...higher than even the speculative 2008 peak that caused riots around the world. If the bad corn weather persists this year, corn is going much higher...and people around the world will riot like crazy over expensive food.

 

ROGERSUFFOLKJR

12:13 AM ET

May 2, 2011

abuse thy dinner

i have seen first hand the effects of the food abuse pandemic wave taking over our world. Working in the health service sector in south east asia i have seen the flocks of overweightmedical tourists coming to thailand to try to wipe away years of self inflicted eating abuse. The problem is compounded tenfold when taking into consideration the genetic "improvements" in the growing of our crops and animals. This is a prime example of humans trying to fix that which isnt broken..

 

SUSANDAVIS

1:24 PM ET

May 3, 2011

More GE

Good reason why genetic engineering needs to be pursued. Crop yield has gone up and we can continue to increase it. This is not an either/or issue. There are more than 2 binary options - food production can increase at a lower cost if we just get out of the way with the irrational fear of the technology.

Safety of course must be considered, but let's balance that with the need to put food on the table.

 

SLIMANDSEXY

1:28 PM ET

May 3, 2011

We are all affected

It is interesting to note that this food crisis is now a global issue and something that politicians will have to give serious consideration.
And with gas prices going up and now we are having issuess with food at what point will we realize that we are all affected?
Soon we will only be able to buy gas and food -what kind of concession will we be able to make for our future?
It is interesting that the article noted that food is the hidden driven in politics. We spend so much time looking at others issues that we are told to look at by the media and other controlling forces that we are blind to an issue that is affecting us all.
We as a nation must begin to start thinking for ourselves. To begin to see the issues that are affecting us and bring those issues to the forefront.
And if the cost of food is not bad, then we have the quality of the foods that we are eating that is causing us to have stubborn belly fat that we cannot get rid of. This and the fact that we are all highly stress.
It is time for a change and I hope that with articles like these it will make us stop and take a closer look at how we are all affected by these issues.

 

RIDGE

10:50 AM ET

May 4, 2011

there are too many of us

there is no doubt that there are too many of us acne treatment and that our natural rescources are running out...it will be interesting to see how much is invested in not only new technologies to ensure food production but healthy, sustainable living as well environmentally friendly solutions...pollution is getting worse and worse and we can only stuff up our water quality so much before it starts having adverse affects on large populations

 

KTM_520

4:54 AM ET

May 6, 2011

Its Becoming a Major Issue

It is obviously a worldwide problem. Food has played a part in the political atmosphere for years and there is no end in sight in that regard. One could wonder what a potential solution could be, but currently there is no end in sight. Not only that, but with food prices on the rise, more and more people are going to turn to cheaper foods as thats all they can afford.

That being said, generally the less healthy food is the most affordable, and thus what many poorer people will end up buying. That in turn leads to obesity, higher health insurance rates, and a generally unhealthy society.

I honestly wish we could come up with an easy solution to the problem, but with the world in the middle of a recession I personally don't see any end in sight. One can only hope that if we can all stand strong together that we can weather the storm. It's a shame that some people in the world have to feel the effects of hunger when others go full.

 

STACHOWI

12:32 PM ET

May 6, 2011

Important topic... some major points/causes missing.

The US has exported an unsustainable standard of living (McDonalds comes to mind) to allow growth in domestic equities by capitalizing on developing markets. The math on the bread doesn't add up. How can wheat go up 75% and bread go up only 10 cents when it is the main ingredient by weight? Last time I checked bread is almost $4 in the US. The point I'm trying to make is this article applies to the US domestically, just as much to the third world, it will just take longer. Little is mentioned about the Fed's monetary policy of "quantitative easing" doubling the money supply in two years... causing rising fuel prices (due to our massive imports and the weak dollar) costs are passed on to exports and domestic production. The average meal travels 1,500 miles, fuel is a significant variable of food costs. Also, the aquifers in the mid-west are running low. Droughts are becoming more common in the US. The Colorado river runs dry by the time it hits Mexico. Monetary policy is causing problems in addition to droughts. People (countries) with access to credit/money will always bid up resources, the US dollar is the reserve currency for the world. If you want to buy commodities, you need dollars and we have first dibs.

 

AJITHROCKSCA

8:53 AM ET

May 7, 2011

Food security - the most important thing

It is very important to have food security and above all food free from poison. we are literally consuming a great deal of poison every day in the form of pesticides and artificial fertilizer.

Natural and organic ways might give relatively less yield when compared to the methods which use pesticides and artificial fertilizers, however over long period of time, the land will become uncultivable.

The major reason for food shortage today is focus on cash crops and real estate boom. people are fogetting that food is the second most important thing after air in this world. very soon we will realize it. Being a vegetarian and avoiding non vegetarian food also helps in food security. Land required for per pound protein generation from vegetarian source is far less compared to land required to raise cattle and generate the same amount of protein requires far higher land resource.

 

ALEXANDER JAMES

9:33 PM ET

May 8, 2011

Food Prices & Gas Prices

The costs in China, India, Malyasia, and the Philippines have skyrocketed. I was talking to a lady in the Philippines who said prices on certain food staples like rice and grain had more than doubled in her local grocery store.

She hasn't had to cut back to only 1 meal but is feeling the pinch. Here locally in Rim Rock Austin and other parts of Texas I've seen and talked to friends who are griping about food prices. But mostly people are upset about the Fed and Bernanke creating massive inflation at the gas pump. Why are gas prices so inelastic? And why don't they go down when oil prices go down. These gas prices were this way when oil was at $114 per barrel. It's now down to $98.32 yet gas prices haven't budged.

 

TOM73AP

8:37 AM ET

May 9, 2011

Agricultural countries

The importance of countries begin to take on a typical farm, increase production and enhance the efficiency will increase wealth in these countries. While no ?wyno?ci not cause local or global war.
BR,
Mike from Tenerife

 

NASOCHKAS

9:52 AM ET

May 10, 2011

If the developing world

If the developing world adopted Western agricultural practices (seeds, crop rotation, fertilizers etc..) then there would be no supply issue, even for a growing population.
The Economist did a great in depth analysis of food markets a few issues back.

On another note, I have a very hard time understanding how people who can barely feed themselves and their existing children, keep on having more kids. If someone can only afford to eat one or two meals a day, why oh why do they keep reproducing? I understand that birth control is not widely available in many developing countries and that the sex drive is strong in most people, but one would think that if there is a danger of their children or themselves starving, that people would somehow avoid risking having more kids.

In the meantime, there must be a more concentrated and coordinated effort by the international community and by local government to educate about birth control and to make it more available. In the long-run, the only thing that will lead to dropping birth rates however is the education of women. Educated women have less children and have them later.

 

RICH

1:47 PM ET

May 10, 2011

food

You talk about something being "at the expense of the common good". So who decides what the "common good" is? If someone faces starvation in another country does that automatically mean that you have to give your own grain to that person even if it means political turmoil in your own country or even starvation down the road?

 

RICH

2:26 PM ET

May 10, 2011

food and Saudi Arabia

Maybe the fundamentalists and the people funding them ought to think about these things the next time they want to sponsor another 9-11. Maybe the whole Middle East should think about it if they think the exporting of their religion and their oil is so important.

 

TFERNSLE

8:36 PM ET

May 10, 2011

The solution is in your back yard

That's a thorough and interesting analysis of the current and coming food crisis, told from the perspective of governments and large corporation. It is telling that no solutions are offered, just a grim analysis of a big problem getting worse. It is a strong indicator that the initial assumptions are flawed; the assumption that this food crisis can be solved by governments and large-scale international corporations.
There are many other people who are concerned about this problem, who are publicizing and practicing practical solutions. The local food movement encourages people to learn to eat what can be grown in their climate, which supports smaller local sustainable farms, makes eating what one can grow in their own yards more appealing, and heads off the possibility that an oil or other crisis will cut off the food supply. The organic food movement supports a much more sustainable means of food production. The slow food movement puts people in touch with their food supply and teaches them to cook and use what is in season, important if you are going to get your food supply locally.
They are new names given to old ideas, I recall Japan catching a lot of flack for restricting rice imports (if only they'd do so with fish) in the 1980's to ensure a local supply. The U.S. "Freedom gardens" of WWII were very effective, and could describe any of those new food movements. Those are evidence that governments have been able to encourage and support local small scale solutions to national problems, and might be able to do so again.

 

KHIR

4:19 AM ET

May 12, 2011

Who are most affected when price is on the rise?

In all countries, when the oil price rice, it will directly increase to the price of food and it supplies. Now who will suffer? of course people all around the world. but who will gain the benefit? yes the oil producer/manufacturer.

Thus in my opinion, we would need alternative to oil/fuel.

hoover floormate

 

GREGORY M

10:43 AM ET

May 15, 2011

Food For Thought

I think it is so sad to see these third world countries and other "poor" countries suffering from these increases in food prices. Meanwhile Americans are throwing away hundreds of thousands if not millions of pounds of food each day. You have to think there is a way that we as Americans can not waste so much food for the cause of helping feed those who wouldn't throw away a crumb.

Not to mention that us Americans have access to high quality worldwide brands of foods, where these other countries can't afford the brands of foods that we Americans and wealthy affiliates of the United States consume on a daily basis.

When you research just how poor other countries are and the types of living conditions these people deal with; it will make you feel like a spoiled brat for complaining about things like hot water running out or the rising prices of gas. Be happy that you have access to a car; there are many people who only dream of transportation by car!

So I think it's our duty as people of "wealth" to come up with ways to help the people in poorer countries who are being effected by the rising food prices so much more than we are.

Just some "food for thought" for my fellow Americans and citizens of other wealthy countries.

 

IOWAFARMBOY

2:28 PM ET

May 17, 2011

I'm spoiled

The problem with most poor countries is they are run by despots. It has absolutely nothing to do with America. I feel just fine eating my food and using my hot water. If you really want to help poor countries you do it by installing market oriented governments. That is the ONLY way to give them a chance, anything else is pure fluff and nonsense.

 

EDUKATE

5:58 AM ET

May 16, 2011

lets go back to the farms www.universitiesinvirginia.org

I say we all need to start tilling our own small plots and produce as much fresh vegetables and fruit for ourselves as possible to relieve the strain on those producers and therefore cap the rising prices .

Most of these huge volumes of cereal crops are used as the basis of the processed food that we can do without in the world. Diabetes, child and adult obesity and a hole bunch of other 'modern' diseases would be kicked into touch

 

IOWAFARMBOY

2:26 PM ET

May 17, 2011

Feel free

Go ahead and grow your own stuff but I sure don't want to waste my valuable time doing it.

 

ADAM GARDNER

12:02 AM ET

May 17, 2011

Utility bills (water, gas,

Utility bills (water, gas, electricity) Adam Gardner have seen massive increases and prompted many underhand practices from companies desperate to householders to switch providers.

 

MARKBUSH

12:43 PM ET

May 17, 2011

In Rom...

They created this "food (bread) and games" - as a mechanism of control. Lets face it - not freedom is the #1 power of the "free world" - its is the fact that we all have (enough) food as part of wealth. In all lands where the wealth part not works, democracy and freedom have a hard time. And where enough food, which is the basic of all wealth, is not there... You got it.
At last the Internet will give all enough games for free, like all the world of warcraft private servers and such which comes mainly as pirate games from that countries.

 

IOWAFARMBOY

2:25 PM ET

May 17, 2011

Lester Brown has been wrong for so long

I don't know how anyone is his right mind would believe Lester Brown!!! He has been so wrong in all his predictions for so wrong I cannot believe this guy has any credibility left!! He and Paul Ehrlich are two of the dumbest guys when it comes to this stuff that I laugh when I read their doom and gloom garbage. Now Julian L. Simon was the man! Everything he wrote about was correct and their is no reason to believe otherwise. I'd file anything written by Lester Brown in the cirlcular file, aka the garbage.

 

PETERD

10:28 PM ET

May 17, 2011

Developing country

Food control infrastructure in many developing countries tends to be inadequate, due to limited resources and often poor management. Food control laboratories are frequently poorly equipped and lack suitably trained analytical staff. This is accentuated where multiple agencies are involved in food control. A lack of overall strategic direction means that limited resources are not properly utilized. Food control systems may also suffer from poorly or inadequately developed compliance policies.

 

BMILLIONAIRE324

12:03 AM ET

May 18, 2011

For everyone

I think we all have experienced raise in food, even in my country I heard something like putting tax into food and medicines, do you think that will bring economy back up, either you you win the lottery or you steal to consider your economy to be good, we all should just stop doing whatever we're doing and take a minute to consider if economy and food is worth even taking it into consideration, anyway... we have to eat, no matter what we do, so just forget about any epic fails!

 

EDUKATE

8:33 AM ET

May 18, 2011

Its all relative

Visiting Asia and knowing what most of the locals are earning, its incredible how far their measly dollars can stretch. Here you. can buy local 'Nasi Katok' , a cup of hot rice, a generous piece of fried chicken with a sweet,spicy sauce on top for around US0.60cents
Ok so its not particularly healthy but I'd like to see what that would sell for in the US.

 

SHASHI111

2:06 PM ET

May 18, 2011

Its scary! Agreed.

Lester's argument is pretty straight forward - demand for food grains is skyrocketing while supply is limited. This is a refined version of Thomas Robert Malthus principle of population crash. Technology so far has played a big role in pushing this crisis and that economics has been so revered.
When you add the issue of energy to this equation of food it becomes more alarming. Oil reserves are declining. People in the rich countries can afford to pay higher prices for oil than people in poor countries for food, which means grains prices will likely go up as oil reserves decline and more food grains or lands are devoted for energy feedstock production.

 

SAM LEOPOLD

4:39 PM ET

May 18, 2011

Malthus... maybe, George... maybe

Henry George ("Progress and Poverty") pointed to another problem (if I understand him correctly): taking values from land, value created by the presence of a community, and never repaying this value to the community out of which the value is created. All land owners and sellers of the products of land resources should be taxed or held to reasonable profit margins to repay the community of buyers for enabling them. Unbalanced values in this area keeps capital from flowing through the community and causes inflation.

 

LLOYD_LESTER

6:04 AM ET

May 19, 2011

Its scary!

I say we all need to start tilling our own small plots and produce as much fresh vegetables and fruit for ourselves as possible to relieve the strain on those producers and therefore cap the rising prices . Ejaculation By Command

Most of these huge volumes of cereal crops are used as the basis of the processed food that we can do without in the world. Diabetes, child and adult obesity and a hole bunch of other 'modern' diseases would be kicked into touch

 

SAM LEOPOLD

7:33 AM ET

May 19, 2011

Remember the "Victory Garden"

Here's a book that was commissioned by US Govt. in early '40's to support the war effort.
http://www.fellowshipcommunity.org/index.php?s=announce&id=70&t=grow-a-garden
I use it. It's a great aid for anyone thinking in this direction. (You can look for it used, but people try to value it as a collector's item and this link is to the current publisher of the book.)

 

KEVIN WALKER

9:17 AM ET

May 19, 2011

Lester's Brown essay

Brown says that Britain, France, and Germany have exhausted their ability to increase yields. That isn't so. Much of Europe keeps out biotech grains. But biotech accounts for a lot of the increase in yields recently. There is plenty of opportunity for technology to increase yields in Europe, if only the policies that keep them out could be defeated.

Brown highlights a problem with wheat, but the problem with wheat yields is the lack of technology. Monsanto is working on developing new traits in wheat, and it has the support of the wheat industry, so over time wheat yields should improve. In China, the problem at the moment isn't not enough food, apparently, but too much food at too low a price because they've put in a challenge to the importation of distiller's dried grains, arguing illegal dumping. It's all coming from the United States, via the ethanol process Brown so disagrees with.

I guess Brown must be a vegan because he thinks it's fine that people in the third world should have to go on forever subsisting on cereal grains. Thankfully, most people disagree with him. It's good news rather that people in China and India are starting to "move up the food chain" as Brown puts it, not a bad thing. High quality protein, vitamin A and other nutrients are to be had from meat, milk, and eggs, Brown's profoundly wrongheaded and factually incorrect analysis notwithstanding.

 

SAM LEOPOLD

1:33 PM ET

May 19, 2011

Really scared now!

Do you have the guts to admit this? Men, especially men, are titillated by the idea of surviving a world where there’s not enough for everyone. Yet, the fact that we don’t live in that world and will probably never live in that world doesn’t seem to matter. The human animal has proven capable of adapting to any and all threats, including famine, accept for one: Selfishness. And we will pontificate with great enthusiasm over some imagined natural scarcity to come, while some of us actually work to create that scarcity if we can, in the name of profit. Monsanto's copyrighting activity is proof of this. Stop evoking Malthusian dribble to justify Western Foreign Policy.

This is the first I've heard of Monsanto working on developing GE wheat. Who exactly is the "wheat industry" in Europe you're talking about? Is it like the "cotton industry" that has brought on the suicide of thousands of small farmers in India who can't keep up with Monsanto's price increases and spiraling credit decreases? The corn and soybean industry in America that has practically ruined the family farmer? The bio-fuel industry in S America that stopped land reform in it's tracks with bribes to officials, and millions of tons of brown market "terminator" seed? Or is it the corn industry in Haiti who sells "terminator" seed to ignorant farmers? Your Monsanto "my saint" is a devil and a blight on the world of agriculture.

 

SAM LEOPOLD

7:00 PM ET

May 19, 2011

this just in:

"GM wheat is a mortal threat to the U.S. wheat market. It is estimated that the loss of markets for GM corn, soy and canola has reached over 300 million dollars per year because the European Union will not purchase GM crops. The U.S. is the world's leading wheat exporter. Many foreign companies have stated that they will not purchase GM wheat or any wheat if GM wheat is grown in the region. Korea is the fifth largest purchaser of U.S. wheat exports. The Korean Flour Mills Industrial Association has stated that they want GM-free certification of any hard red spring wheat they purchase. The price of spring wheat could drop by one-third if a GM variety is introduced commercially into Montana or North Dakota, according to agricultural economist Dr. Robert Wisner of Iowa State University. This will spell doom for North American wheat growers even if they decide to not plant GM wheat themselves." Organic Consumer's Association Newsletter May 19, 2011.

 

SAM LEOPOLD

8:58 AM ET

May 20, 2011

By the way...

Why do you think Europeans reject GM products? Are they stupid? Arrogant? Mean? Do they know something about GMO's that we don't know? (Do your own research on that.)

We have untold $billions in biotech. We've bet the ranch on it. Don't they know that? With so much at stake America wants to corner the market on food, not for America, because biotech is causing havoc here, costing jobs, health, family integrity, our international reputation, but for Monsanto shareholders. You could buy their stock, but I wouldn't, any more than I would buy old bags of agent orange.

 

BRIANMICHAELPOWELL

9:28 AM ET

May 19, 2011

Mother's mad!

Mother Nature is pissed-off because her children are gluttons. America has tremendous resources, but we treat them with such contempt. The unintended consequences of our behavior are about to come to roost and we are not prepared, because we are incapable (as a society) to understand moderation and balance.

Brown's book is a seminal one and a guidepost to help us to live in the world that we have so carelessly ignored. I think that the word is hubris and the result of hubris is always tragic.

 

JUDITA

6:51 PM ET

May 19, 2011

Hard Reality

Yes, rising food prices is a hard reality to face. It affects us where it matters - finding food for our families. If my family had not enough food, I too would go into the streets if I knew that my leaders are living in ultimate luxury. Revolutionary

 

JBARGE

9:36 PM ET

May 19, 2011

Avoiding multinationals to deal directly w/US farmers

Mr. Brown doesn't explain how grain would be exported from the U.S. if commodities traders were circumvented in favor of direct contracts between growers and foreign nationals.

All of the grain elevators in the largest export market in America (Portland,Oregon) are operated by their own traders.

 

SWALSH82

7:07 PM ET

May 22, 2011

Food Shortage In Nepal

I have recently returned from a month in Nepal doing a fair amount of trekking and general sight-seeing. At one hotel we stayed in we started to speak to the owner about the general state of Nepal and also a number of current issues. This was a good man to speak to, very well educated, he had travelled and as such, he had a good global perspective that he could relate to the local issues.
Anyways, he lived in a very remote town called Muktinath which is way up near the Chinese border. About 5 or 6 years ago they got their first road connection to the rest of the country. As a result of this, the farmers and folks involved with agriculture can now get their products far easier to the larger markets of Kathmandu and India, meaning that the farmers get a higher price for the products that they produce.
And, while the farmers get a higher price for their produce, my new friend told me that the labourers and generally unskilled people who lived in the village could now not afford to buy fruits and vegetables because they all got sold to the bigger markets. So, as a result, the farmers are all getting rich, and the poor are all get malnourished and most likely will suffer degenerative problems de to the lack of vitamins and minerals in their diets.
To make matters worse, their was one huge house in the village, right on the main street. Whoever owned the house had built a massive deck with ornate and made a huge driveway with coloured decorative epoxy flooring all over it. I mean, this was on the main street of a dirt poor village. It almost looked to me like whoever owned this house wanted to show off their money and rub it into the faces of the rest of the inhabitants.
My friend told me that the house had recently been built by a large farmer in the area who had come to his wealth purely by the fact of the road opening. So, while there are clearly some getting rich off this, the majority of the villages population cannot even afford to eat proper meals.
As mass transport gets cheaper and cheaper will this situation be occurring ever more and more? Will we (as residents of the western world) be unknowingly be contributing to the degredation and lack of nutrition in the undeveloped world. Well, I think we would be very naive to think that it is not already happening. As food scarcity increases, will we see more houses with glass balustades and epoxy flooring driveways next to mud huts whose residents are semi-starved and malnourished?