The LWOT: Massive cache of Gitmo docs released

Foreign Policy and the New America Foundation bring you a twice weekly brief on the legal war on terror. You can read it on foreignpolicy.com or get it delivered directly to your inbox -- just sign up here.

BY ANDREW LEBOVICH | APRIL 26, 2011

Massive cache of Gitmo docs released

Several American and European newspapers on Sunday night released an enormous cache of documents - some obtained by the anti-secrecy website WikiLeaks and others from third sources - providing a wealth of information from the files of many of the 779 former and current detainees at Guantánamo Bay, stretching from 2002 until the beginning of 2009, when the Obama administration instituted its own review of the then-241 remaining detainees (NYT, NPR, Washington Post, McClatchy, Guardian, Telegraph, Le Monde, El Pais, Der Spiegel - for a round-up of coverage, see FP). The documents, primarily composed of Detainee Assessment Briefs (DAB) of over 700 detainees but also containing interrogators' memos on threat rankings, judging al Qaeda cover stories, and guidelines for judging terror links (available here), provide never-before released information on over 150 prisoners, as well as further information on all but about 75 detainees (NYT).

While the broad contours of much of the information in the documents has been previously reported, the new documents provide a more detailed look at the often contentious and subjective internal deliberations surrounding detainee evaluations (NYT, Guardian, Guardian, Miami Herald, AP, Guardian). The documents also reveal the complications surrounding detainee transfers, whereby diplomatic pressure and assurances led to the transfer of many detainees deemed "high risk" while detainees deemed innocent (150 from Afghanistan and Pakistan, for instance) sometimes took years to be cleared and repatriated (WSJ, BBC, Guardian, CNN, NPR). Around 220 detainees were deemed "dangerous" while another 380 were considered more low-level fighters (Telegraph). Additionally, around 100 detainees were deemed to have "psychiatric illnesses," and the Times reports that detainees regularly discussed suicide (Guardian, NYT).

Initial reporting on the documents does contain new data on a number of fronts:

  • The Washington Post and others trace the travel patterns of Osama bin Laden and other key al Qaeda figures before, during and after the 9/11 attacks, which includes the journey to and escape from Tora Bora, planning for future attacks (some allegedly including nuclear or chemical weapons), and the presence of several al Qaeda leaders in Karachi on the morning of 9/11 (Washington Post, Guardian, NYT, AP). Reported plots allegedly included a plan to attack London's Heathrow Airport (Der Spiegel);
  • Interrogators were told to consider links to Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence (ISI) to be equivalent to links with al Qaeda, the Taliban, Hamas or Hezbollah (Guardian, Reuters, AFP, AP); 
  • At least 10 foreign governments, including China, Tunisia, Morocco, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Tajikistan, Jordan, Algeria, Yemen and Kuwait were allowed to send agents to interrogate detainees (Guardian);
  • A Libyan former detainee now believed to be training rebels fighting dictator Muammar Qaddafi, Abu Sufian Ibrahim Ahmed Hamuda Bin Qumu, was alleged to have trained in two al Qaeda camps in Afghanistan and engendered close links with the organization (NPR, NYT);
  • Khalid Sheikh Mohammed reportedly told interrogators in 2004 a nuclear bomb hidden in Europe would detonate if Osama bin Laden were killed or captured, while other detainees told their interrogators about plans, some wildly implausible and others less-so, to acquire, transport and use radiological or chemical materials (Telegraph);
  • At least three al Qaeda leaders provided information, likely coerced, about alleged plans for Dr. Aafia-Siddiqui, a U.S.-educated neuroscientist to smuggle explosives into the U.S. and possibly manufacture bioweapons (Guardian);
  • U.S. interrogators believed an al Qaeda "assassin" had also worked as an informant for British intelligence while planning and conducting attacks in Pakistan after 9/11 (Guardian, BBC);
  • Involvement with one of nine mosques around the world could be regarded as an indicator of terrorist links, including a mosque in Montreal, Canada (Globe and Mail).
  • And having a certain type of Casio wristwatch was reportedly considered "an indicator of [al Qaeda] training in the manufacture of improvised explosive devices (IEDs)" (Der Spiegel).  

British papers showed particular concern for British detainees in their coverage of the documents, and the Telegraph reports that at least 35 Guantánamo detainees were radicalized in part in Britain (Guardian, Guardian, Guardian, Telegraph). The Times and NPR have created interactive graphics showing detailed data on the detainees, including recidivism by country of origin and the repatriation of detainees of different threat levels (NYT, NYT, NPR, Guardian). And the Washington Post has a timeline of major events at Guantánamo (Washington Post).  For additional commentary on what the documents do - and don't - mean, see Foreign Policy, "The Prisoner's Dilemma" (FP).

Pentagon spokesman Geoff Morrell and Amb. Dan Fried, the U.S. envoy charged with closing Guantánamo, condemned the document release, saying (NYT):

Both the previous and the current Administrations have made every effort to act with the utmost care and diligence in transferring detainees from Guantanamo. ... Both Administrations have made the protection of American citizens the top priority and we are concerned that the disclosure of these documents could be damaging to those efforts.

The Washington Post's Anne Kornblut notes this morning that various organizations and politicians from across the political spectrum have used the new documents to bolster long-held positions about Guantánamo (Washington Post). 172 prisoners remain at Gitmo, and this weekend's Washington Post also has a must-read detailing the chronology and reasons behind President Obama's failure to close the prison (Washington Post, Guardian). And a defiant U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder in a speech on Apr. 25 laid out the four "essential" priorities for the Justice Department, including "protecting Americans from terrorism at home and abroad" (Washington Post, CNN).

Trials and Tribulations

  • Federal prosecutors filed a superseding indictment (available here) on Apr. 25 charging four men with involvement in the 2008 Mumbai attacks; purported Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) figure and attack coordinator Sajid Mir, Abu Qahafa, Mazhar Iqbal, and a man known only as "Major Iqbal" (AP).
  • International forces in Afghanistan reportedly killed a senior al Qaeda figure in the country, a Saudi named Abdul Ghani or Abu Hafs al-Najdi, two weeks ago in the country's east (BBC, AP, Reuters). Coalition forces also arrested a purported leader of the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan (IMU) in the northern Kunduz province last Friday (NYT).
  • Indonesian authorities arrested a 20th man in connection with recent bomb plots targeting moderate Muslims and Christians in the country, as authorities grow concerned about the involvement of older militant groups in the new wave of attacks and plots (AP, Jakarta Post, VOA).
  • Three suspected Northern Irish dissidents appeared in court yesterday after they were allegedly caught with weapons last Friday, one of three weapons seizures in Northern Ireland in the past several days (BBC, Guardian, AP).
  • Iran and Iraq signed an extradition agreement on Apr. 24 that may lead to members of the banned Mujahideen-e-Khalq organization being sent to Iran to face charges there (Reuters).
  • Investigators have named a suspect in the attempted bombing of a Colorado shopping mall last week, Earl Albert Moore, but said the incident was likely not related to the 12th anniversary of the Columbine High School shootings, which took place nearby (AP).

Virginie Montet/AFP/Getty Images

 

Andrew Lebovich is a program associate in the National Security Studies Program at the New America Foundation.

KRYPTER

10:36 AM ET

April 26, 2011

All these unlawful

All these unlawful combatants, aka terrorists, should have been hanged at Guantanamo. It's unconscionable that we're releasing these murderers so that they can kill dozens or hundreds of people again. And it's even worse that there are so many fools in our society defending the Islamists and not their victims.

 

MECORMANY

7:36 PM ET

April 26, 2011

AS A FOOL

i'd like to point out a few things. What you are advocating is mass lynching since many of these so-called terrorists were guilty of nothing more than wrong place wrong time, knowing someone or possibly knowing how a group acted because he'd driven his taxi through an area a number of times.
i would hope you still possess enough respect for the American rule of law and International law that you would not hang them without a trial,but a slight rub there - we enhanced interrogated too many that their cases would be thrown out.
How can someone be an unlawful combatant when a superpower military force has invaded his country. The US by slick sleight of hand calls them enemy combatants by using such trickery as going to war under the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Terrorists act which is supposedly back by the War Powers Resolution although to the best of my knowledge nobody has verified this in court. But that's our way to getting around declaring war on these countries (interesting tidbit, last time we declared war? 1942. Against? Romania.
If we actually declare war we have to treat the enemy figjhters as POW's and there are strict rules as to how they can be treated.
And to get around any other objections the rest of the world that actually respects the rules of law and dur process, the ones we lecture about civil liberties to? Well, we claim all this is legal because of a Presidential Military Order which evidently trumps any rule of international law or Geneva Convention article - "Detention, Treatment, and Trial of Certain Non-Citizens in the War Against Terrorism." That's the name of it and that's our sole justification for behaving like a banana republic. For taking men's entire lives away from them and making them live in a hole. And these aren't all terrorists by any means. Had you the above and other articles you'd know many of the serious actual terrorists had big time political power behind them and were let go after 5 years ro so. It's the poor schmuck who nobody misses, who is guilty of nothing or of being a peripheral member of some flunky organization that may have said hello to AQ at one point in time who is going to sit there.

Everything about this concentration camp, because that is exactly what ti is, jeers at everything this country one stood for and letures other countries about. Due process, right to be represented by a lawyer, if a POW, humane treatment, but when you invent a third course of action called 'whatever we feel like and can get away with' you've sold your soul. Every bit of high moral ground you've thought you had for years was tossed out the window helped by the invasion of two countries that posed no more threat to us than Switzerland and which weren't involved in 911, as though 19 civilian religious extremists crimes would be cause to invade a sovereign state in the first place. You'd have a long day's travel ahead of you to find a country that s not a total and abject client state of ours who would say we've done anything right or legal since 911. We're so far down the rabbit hole, we've jumped so many sharks and screwed so many pooches, we're beyond rogue state and into pariah territory.
But you would hand THEM. And I guess if one of our actions were to be taken, it probably would be yours -- because we can. and that's the new United States motto. not Under God or even equality or justice or some hokem that was never going to happne. Because We Can. Who's Going to Stop Us.
Sure makes me proud to be 'Merican.
Actually I'd be out of this Surveillance Authoritarian State but for the fact I'm too old and other countries don't see any benefits to letting senior citizens with a blind eye and a few other ailments move to their shores.
And while we're on the subject of victims, who would you guess has killed more people -- Islamist extremists or western good guys? or just narrow it down to the US good guys? And we won't even start it at 911, lets go way back to 1920 when the Mid East had the bad luck to find out as more exploration went on they were sitting on oceans of oil.
Why do they hate us, starts right around then.
The Germans and Japanese found out in the 40s, many countries have over the years. Your country is not always right just because you were born in it.