How America Must Respond to the Massacre in Syria

It’s time for President Obama to back up his rhetoric with firm action. The first step: Recall the U.S. ambassador from Damascus.

BY MARCO RUBIO | APRIL 28, 2011

In recent days, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's regime has used its army to murder hundreds of innocent civilians as part of a vicious campaign of violence against unarmed Syrian demonstrators. What we are witnessing in Syria is another tragic outrage in the Middle East that requires immediate condemnation backed by specific measures from the United States and the international community. U.S. President Barack Obama needs to make clear whose side America is on, back up our rhetoric with action, and clearly articulate why Syria matters to the United States.

Clearly, we should be on the side of the Syrian people longing for freedom and challenging the regime's corrupt and repressive rule. Unfortunately, the Obama administration's hesitancy to weigh in has been mistaken for indecision at best and indifference at worst. The president needs to speak directly to the Syrian people to communicate American support for their legitimate demands, condemn Assad's murderous campaign against innocent civilians, and sternly warn Assad and his cohorts that they cannot continue grossly violating human rights, supporting terrorism, and sowing instability among Syria's neighbors.

But his words must be backed by clear, firm actions. As ill-advised as it was to restore diplomatic relations with Syria by sending an American ambassador to Damascus last year, we should now sever ties and recall the ambassador at once. While Syria is already under heavy U.S. sanctions as a designated state sponsor of terror, we should expand sanctions to include persons identified as authorizing, planning, or participating in deplorable human rights violations against unarmed civilians. Our partners in Europe, Turkey, and the Arab Gulf share many of our interests in Syria and play a large role in that country, and the president must put the full diplomatic weight of the United States behind an effort to convince them to adopt meaningful economic and diplomatic sanctions targeting Assad and his enablers in the regime.

America has an obligation to weigh in strongly about the situation in Syria. For years, its regime has aided the terrorist operations of Hezbollah and Hamas, supported Iran's destabilizing policies, and helped terrorists kill Americans in Iraq. The regime has not only destabilized the region but also directly acted against the national security interests of the United States. We simply cannot sit silently as innocent people peacefully challenge a regime committed to undermining the United States and its allies.

This administration must stop sitting on the sidelines as innocent Syrian people are mowed down by the regime's tanks. At an early point in the Libyan struggle, when a clear U.S. policy could have achieved significant successes at lower costs, the president failed to act. Now in Syria, we are faced with a challenge requiring the United States to find its voice in defense of the Syrian people and to implement meaningful actions in the immediate term. The administration must stop dithering as innocent Syrians die at the hands of a merciless regime.

KARIM SAHIB/AFP/Getty Images

 

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) is a member of the Senate Foreign Relations and Intelligence Committees.

MORON99

12:00 PM ET

April 28, 2011

well, duh!

When in rome, do as the romans do.
We fund an insurgency against Syria exactly the same way they fund and support insurgencies and terrorists in Lebanon, Israel, Gaza, and Iraq. All them folks who learned the art of smuggling weapons and planting IEDs in Iraq are going to be real handy now.

 

TIMJUNIOR

1:58 PM ET

April 28, 2011

Syria

As urgent as this is, it's easier said than done. To claim that sending an ambassador to Syria was a mistake is foolish. Syria is aligning itself with Iran along with Hezbollah and Hamas all due to the fact that it's trying to exert influence and remind the U.S. it's still there, not because it's great friends with Iran.

That whole period when the Bush administration ignored Syria, we had Hamas and Hezbollah grow substantially and the influence of Iran grow larger than it should. To just yank the ambassador would just put the U.S. in a position to being ignorant of the situation on the ground and lower the possibility of this ending as soon as possible.

I'm sure you forgot Israel as well and the fact that Syria is quite a threat to that country. As I write this, actions to censure Syria were blocked by Russia, China, and Lebanon. Actions started by the E.U. and the U.S.

While I don't fully agree with Obama's foreign policy and believe he has one of the worst National Security teams ever put in place, second to Bush, Obama can't just go shooting the gun every time a dictator decides to shoot people. The region is just teeming with violence everywhere and the U.S. can not handle one more.

These people have to learn on their own to fight for democracy and the U.S. should provide moral support and if possible, financial as well. It worked after the break up of the Soviet Union and it should now as well.

Now Mr. Rubio, you mentioned the first step. What's the second one?

 

MORON99

2:53 PM ET

April 28, 2011

shuffle the deck

You play the hand you got.

The sunni are already our friends via our support for Egyptian demonstrators, Saudi, Kuwait, and UAE. They do not like our policy regarding Israel because Israel is in the way of Islam's plans for global domination. Their hatred of the west is taught to them in the mosque since infancy. That's because the people in the mosques are also the people who most strongly want Islam to take over the world. Islam can't start taking over Europe and Asia until they finish the job against a few million jews. Iraq is a wash. The arabs don't like the increase of persian influence in Iraq but they also know that nobody - not even a persian - deserved to live under Saddam. The arab spring is a direct result of Iraq but not because of USA. Rather because Al-Jazeera broadcast purple fingers into millions of homes and has been relentlessly anti-dictator ever since. So those are the main cards in our hand.

If a bunch of really good weapons & stuff we give to Saudi happens to end up with Syrian insurgents then we should ask the Saudis to launch an investigation. Once the insurgency is unstoppable then Israel should deploy a few jets strikes here and there against Assad's heavy weapons. Just to prove to the sunni that the Jew is a strong friend against the persian crescent. That will go a country mile in terms of setting the stage for maintaining peace with Egypt.

If played properly, the result is a complete reshuffling of the middle-east deck that is significantly to western benefit. Timing and propaganda are extremely important. We should try to get a read on how Al jazeera editorial and opinion pages would react. AJA is just about the most powerful organization in the mid-east these days.

 

MALICEIT

5:16 PM ET

April 28, 2011

RE:

I would of cared more if it was written not by Rubio...

 

AUGUST WEST

5:33 PM ET

April 28, 2011

Restraint

Assad has shown far more restraint that did Israel in Gaza. So let's recall our Ambassador from Tel Aviv.

 

MORON99

8:05 PM ET

April 28, 2011

August, I call your lie and

August, I call your lie and raise you a question.
When did Israel show less restraint than tanks and machine guns mowing down unarmed civilians at a funeral? answer with places, dates, and numbers please.

 

IRISOOO

7:40 PM ET

April 28, 2011

www.happyshopping100.com

The website whol esale for many kinds of fas hion sho es,
like the nik e,jord an,pr ada, also including the jea ns,shirts,bags,hat and the decorations.
All the products are free ship ping, and the the price is com petitive,
and also can accept the pay pal pay ment.
,after the paym ent, can ship within short time.

 

FIFTH HORSEMAN

10:27 PM ET

April 28, 2011

Fallujah calling

Where we you when the U.S. was massacring hundreds of civilians in Fallujah using white phosphorus and cluster bombs?

 

PATRICK DEBURGH

10:41 PM ET

April 28, 2011

Sen Rubio has no Foreign Policy bona fides

It is not very clear just what expertise a newly installed Tea Party Senator with zero previous national or international experience brings to the topic of this article. Therefore this really smells overtly partisan in tone, substance and style.

The Republican Party is undergoing a real schizophrenic episode these days. Many instances have been documented of elected Republican flip-flops on the whole gamut of issues facing the nation so whatever this one is saying now has little chance of being representative of the caucus or even the Senator before the Syrian crisis is resolved.

 

MR. HOWARD

9:42 AM ET

April 29, 2011

More Sanctions?

Ok, so we withdraw our ambassador, cut off all diplomatic ties to the Syrian government, and impose even more sanctions on Syria.

We've just effectively killed any chance of negotiating a peaceful solution- no matter how small that might be, destroyed a relatively easy way for dissidents in the country to contact us, imposed travel sanctions-which would mean they can't go to America, sad day for them, but not really doing anything. That also brings up the definition, you say that the sanctions should be expanded to people "identified as authorizing, planning, or participating in deplorable human rights violations against unarmed civilians". How do you plan to identify, confirm, or justify the claims? All your going to get are the top commanders, who probably wouldn't be doing anything with the US anyways. This is all not to mention that we will be meddling with ANOTHER Muslim community, and no matter how you do it, it can be very easily spun to make the US look like a foreign power just trying to intervene in other peoples affairs. And how do you think that the world will view the most ardent ally of Israel trying to remove one of the governments that most ardently rejects it's right to exist? Any more ideas?

The United States should condemn what is happening there. But to get rid of diplomacy is a huge mistake. How about we instead try to cease this by use of the diplomacy that you are trying to get rid of? Provide incentives for Assad and his party to leave government, or assist the protesters in a non flashy, underground way that doesn't provoke the worlds ire? Actually, I'd bet we're already doing that. The negative of it? It draws criticism for no use of blunt force and action. I defer to the article.

 

SCOOP

9:55 AM ET

April 29, 2011

Syria's Upheaval Reaches Far Past Its Borders

by Borzou Daragahi, Los Angeles Times, April 27, 2011

"Unrest roiling Syria, a linchpin state in the Middle East, is shaking the region in ways that even the revolution in Egypt did not, threatening to upend some long-standing alliances and encouraging neighbors to scramble for sudden advantage. Already, the chaos in Syria is showing the potential to affect issues as broad as Iran's conflict with the U.S. and its allies, and as narrow as regional water rights. Whether or not President Bashar Assad weathers the storm, the uprising is forcing countries in the region to formulate a response and may ultimately change the balance of power. Analysts say Saudi Arabia may be considering using its diplomatic and political influence to offer Assad a way out of his predicament, but for a price: breaking his alliance with Iran, which is accused of stirring up trouble among Shiite Muslims in countries such as Bahrain and Saudi Arabia."

 

SCOOP

10:03 AM ET

April 29, 2011

The Tehran-Damascus Axis

by Amir Taheri, Wall Street Journal, April 27, 2011

"Syrian opposition sources claim that Tehran has sent snipers to help Mr. Assad kill demonstrators. The regime used this tactic during the protests following the disputed presidential election of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2009. (Neda Agha-Soltan, the young woman who became the symbol of the pro-democracy uprising in Iran, was killed by one such sniper.) President Barack Obama has also spoken of Iran's possible involvement in Syria. Whether or not Tehran has sent snipers to prop up Mr. Assad, the Islamic Republic is bound by treaty to help him fight 'any threats against Syria's security and stability."

 

SCOOP

10:09 AM ET

April 29, 2011

The Syria Lobby

Why Washington keeps giving a pass to the Assad regime, Wall Street Journal, April 27, 2011

"How does a small, energy-poor and serially misbehaving Middle Eastern regime always seem to get a Beltway pass? Conspiracy nuts and other tenured faculty would have us believe that country is Israel, though the Jewish state shares America's enemies and our democratic values. But the question really applies to Syria, where the Assad regime is now showing its true nature. The deeper problem is a flawed analysis of the Syrian regime's beliefs, intentions and capacity for change."

 

DG23

12:20 PM ET

April 29, 2011

STOP IT!

For God's sake, who are you to talk in the name of the Syrian people?! Stop it now we are fed up of your blunt interference in our internal issues. We don't want your freedom. We have a free will and we can decide our own destiny. You USA brought only wars to our countries, your democracy is a big lie to cover your real interests. Stop it!!!! Enough, I'm a Syrian citizen and proud to be and against you now or in any time under any reason. Not more than 1% of the Syrian population is against the regime, others are with it asking only for reforms,,, so plzzzzzz you as media should objective in your articles and analysis of our situation,,, again leave us in peace, let us build our countries with our hands! Plz ask all Syrian people to present a real picture, you are humiliating millions of Syrians by your subjectivity!

 

MORON99

1:55 PM ET

April 29, 2011

not more than 1%. That means

not more than 1%. That means Syria has more people than China.
You should not believe everything SANA says. For example, SANA says that it is "armed gangs" shooting soldiers. Those armed gangs are shabeha following orders. There is an intelligence document instructing them to shoot both soldiers and demonstrators. They do it to make sure that the soldiers will not join with demonstrators.,

 

PUBLICUS

3:20 PM ET

April 29, 2011

Humiliating???

Assad and his gangsters in control of the country aren't listing to voices of reform. Never have listened, never will. They instead are shooting other Syrians to death which seems not to matter much to you. Each hour now more Syrians are deciding their own "destiny" as you state it in histrionics. Whole cities are expressing their outrage against the tyrant oligarchy led by the Assad family, much the same as is occurring in Lybia. You are cynical about democracy and try to use democracy as a blunt weapon to wield against the United States. The consequence is that your statements fail completely to have impact here.

 

PUBLICUS

1:56 PM ET

April 29, 2011

This isn't Toyota making a recall

FP points out at the end of Rubio's piece that :

"Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) is a member of the Senate Foreign Relations and Intelligence Committees."

If FP wants the views of a respected Republican US Senator, Richard Lugar (R-IN) is much more than the still wet behind the ears Hon. Marco Rubio. Where are Sen Lugar's views? If Sen Lugar might have the same view (I don't know if he does), I'd prefer to hear it from Sen Lugar than Sen Rubio.

Republican Senator Rubio is still in his first months as a United States Senator so his glib and banal foreign policy advice to the president, his colleagues in the Senate and to the nation is not unexpected. Still, I really hadn't known FP welcomed political grandstanding. Worse, political grandstanding by a novice, a rookie, a tea bagger. Besides, FP, publishing Sen Rubio isn't going to help your subscriber base or your website hits.

 

ZATHRAS

3:38 PM ET

April 29, 2011

You get what you pay for

I suggest Sen. Rubio invest in a higher-priced ghostwriter if he's going to weigh in about foreign policy issues on this site.

It must be tempting, given the limited clerk hire allowances available to Senate offices, to assign the task of drafting articles like this one to former campaign aides up to speed on all the cheer lines to use when addressing certain audiences in the state of Florida. Honestly, though, the point of sending this piece in to Foreign Policy must have been to make people think it expressed the Senator's own views. It's just not dignified to submit something that might be summarized, "Rubio on Syria: US must shake its fist harder!" or "Rubio declares America must hold its breath until Syria outrages end."

There's something else. One thing the Obama administration did not do while it was "dithering" over whether to attack the Libyan government is consult in any meaningful way with the Congress. I think President Obama or one of his aides probably mentioned to old Carl Levin over cocktails that the Arabs wanted us to hit Qadhafi (but not too hard), so this might happen. This doesn't really count as "meaningful consultation" as I understand that phrase. A member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee has got to care about stuff like that. It's kind of in the job description -- maybe not in the one Mr. Rubio may have been handed during the campaign by the Club for Growth, but in the Constitution and the precedents of this particular committee. This piece makes it appear that being consulted before a President orders an attack on another country isn't something Rubio much cares about one way or another. A more experienced ghostwriter might have enabled him to avoid giving such an undesirable impression.

Strictly speaking, a President doesn't need to consult with Congress before taking any of the "clear, firm actions" Sen. Rubio's ghostwriter recommends here with respect to Syria. Obama can hold his breath and shake his fist all on his own. However, just on the off chance that the warrior princess lobby within the Obama administration is thinking about trying to talk the President into another war of conscience, a Senator ought to be seen as insisting that the President discuss this with the Senate first. The best ghostwriters know how to assert rights to turf belonging to their boss -- in addition to getting him beyond the cheer lines and urgent calls for the President to shake his fist harder.

I'm sure Washington is full of eligible ghostwriters, some much better than others, and choosing one who can write better and make a new Senator look better than a run-of-the-mill former campaign aide is able to might be tricky. Perhaps Sen. Rubio has a senior aide who could help him navigate through these difficult waters.

 

ZATHRAS

3:38 PM ET

April 29, 2011

You get what you pay for

I suggest Sen. Rubio invest in a higher-priced ghostwriter if he's going to weigh in about foreign policy issues on this site.

It must be tempting, given the limited clerk hire allowances available to Senate offices, to assign the task of drafting articles like this one to former campaign aides up to speed on all the cheer lines to use when addressing certain audiences in the state of Florida. Honestly, though, the point of sending this piece in to Foreign Policy must have been to make people think it expressed the Senator's own views. It's just not dignified to submit something that might be summarized, "Rubio on Syria: US must shake its fist harder!" or "Rubio declares America must hold its breath until Syria outrages end."

There's something else. One thing the Obama administration did not do while it was "dithering" over whether to attack the Libyan government is consult in any meaningful way with the Congress. I think President Obama or one of his aides probably mentioned to old Carl Levin over cocktails that the Arabs wanted us to hit Qadhafi (but not too hard), so this might happen. This doesn't really count as "meaningful consultation" as I understand that phrase. A member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee has got to care about stuff like that. It's kind of in the job description -- maybe not in the one Mr. Rubio may have been handed during the campaign by the Club for Growth, but in the Constitution and the precedents of this particular committee. This piece makes it appear that being consulted before a President orders an attack on another country isn't something Rubio much cares about one way or another. A more experienced ghostwriter might have enabled him to avoid giving such an undesirable impression.

Strictly speaking, a President doesn't need to consult with Congress before taking any of the "clear, firm actions" Sen. Rubio's ghostwriter recommends here with respect to Syria. Obama can hold his breath and shake his fist all on his own. However, just on the off chance that the warrior princess lobby within the Obama administration is thinking about trying to talk the President into another war of conscience, a Senator ought to be seen as insisting that the President discuss this with the Senate first. The best ghostwriters know how to assert rights to turf belonging to their boss -- in addition to getting him beyond the cheer lines and urgent calls for the President to shake his fist harder.

I'm sure Washington is full of eligible ghostwriters, some much better than others, and choosing one who can write better and make a new Senator look better than a run-of-the-mill former campaign aide is able to might be tricky. Perhaps Sen. Rubio has a senior aide who could help him navigate through these difficult waters.

 

MORON99

4:23 PM ET

April 29, 2011

our foreign policy should not

our foreign policy should not be held hostage to partisan politics from either side. We have a clear opening here to trade in some old enemies for new friends. Partisan bickering is synonymous with squandered opportunity.

 

CHADI DIRANI

9:59 PM ET

April 30, 2011

Rubio is right, any better proposals?

I'm just posting this reply because I read many negative attacks, and I know it's all polarized... but still, it's good to add a word.

In Fact, what Senator Rubio wrote shouldn't be that shocking!!!
Because this was a long debate in both houses, Department of State, & inside the administration, everyone knows that!
And the whole approach or re-sending the American Ambassador to Syria (knowing that the withdrawal happened after the Lebanese PM's assassination in 2005, & the International Tribunal for Lebanon didn’t finish its work yet) was an engagement trial, where facts showed that the Syrian regime gave nothing & was willing to change nothing! Especially with its Iranian alliance! Moreover, this regime, is now committing brutal massacres against Syrian people! Why? Because they demand freedom!

As a young Lebanese, I would say, this Ironic engagement game should stop! We've paid a lot so far... much more than anyone can imagine! I don't think anyone who truly believes in Freedom, Democracy and Human rights can tolerate such regime! & let’s face it, the ambassador can’t and won’t change the regime’s behavior, we all know it!
This has nothing to do with the internal American politics, absolutely nothing! And please, don't “deceive” yourselves and think that tyrants can see a difference between both parties! (Not even a tiny one)

Probably it's time for the States to understand & realize that this by-policy behavior should stop! We protect democracy, freedom, human rights & minority rights inside America, we consider it to be “untouchable”, yet we compromise on these same values when it comes to international relations! This is not smart anymore... it's even silly with today's communication tools, nothing is secret anymore, nothing is hidden, we live in the globalization era, & I guess “Wiki-leaks” is the lesson to learn!

And my question to those who negatively criticized what Rubio wrote: Friends, would you accept what's happening now in Syria to happen in NY, DC, California, Florida, Michigan, Texas, Massachusetts, or any other American State?! Would you accept police-snipers to shoot American people in their heads if they protest or even show-up in the streets?! Would you accept tanks & artillery to bomb American citizens because they are refusing to live as prisoners forever?! Would you accept your brother, father, friend or son to be kidnapped & assassinated because they took part in a peaceful demonstration?!
I guess, this would be the end of the world! Not even in Hollywood’s movies this would happen!!!

I know your answers, I live & study in the U.S. since 3 years ago, I know the Americans’ nobility, & I know it’s time to embrace these problems!

Rubio is right in what he is asking, Assad’s criminal behavior is absolutely intolerable, the Syrian people have the right to gain their freedom, America is still the super-power country & is required to act accordingly. If anyone wants to object, let him propose a better alternative solution, and we will all support!