The Code of the Hills

It’s not Abbottabad the United States should be worried about.

BY AKBAR AHMED | MAY 6, 2011

The killing of Osama bin Laden has thrust the town of Abbottabad, Pakistan, into the international spotlight. However surprising it may be to find al Qaeda's notorious leader not in a cave in the tribal areas but in a comfortable villa near the capital, it is perhaps fitting that Abbottabad is having its 15 minutes of fame. The hill resort town -- named after Maj. James Abbott, the first British deputy commissioner who arrived there in the mid-19th century -- is a perfect example of one side of the cultural divide that now defines Pakistan.

When I arrived in Abbottabad to enter boarding school at Burn Hall, a century after Abbott, it was a bustling town with retired officials living in neat homes, a golf course, and, of course, the famous Pakistan Military Academy. I was later posted there as assistant commissioner under training for the Pakistani government, in the late 1960s, a post that oversaw judicial, revenue and law and order matters. There could have been no town more integrated into the state than Abbottabad.

A decade later, I found myself in charge of a region that could not be more different: South Waziristan. While Abbottabad's population is a mixture of ethnic Pashtun tribesmen and Punjabi settlers, Waziristan is made up entirely of Pashtuns. The Waziristan tribes, who were long suspected of providing a safe haven for bin Laden, have long felt that they possess their own history, culture, code of behavior, and identity that are distinct from the Pakistani nation-state. When I would ask the elders of Waziristan why they resisted the modern state, they would reply good-humoredly, "Why do you wish to impose the corrupt police and revenue officials of Pakistan on us, while at the same time taking away our freedom?"

It is crucial to understand the dynamics that differentiate these two very different parts of Pakistan now associated in the world media with bin Laden. Only by more successfully navigating the tension between the two regions, and between tribe and state in Pakistan, will the United States have any hope of stabilizing South Asia.

An old Pashtun proverb sums up the historical divide well: "Honor (nang) ate up the mountains, taxes (qalang) ate up the plains." The proverb means that tribesmen living in the mountains, where the government has little sway, destroy each other in tribal warfare over honor. Meanwhile, the settled populations below are subject to the dominance of the state, and are suppressed through oppressive taxes, or qalang.

Qalang societies live in plains, on irrigated lands that are often fed by big rivers, and their economies are integrated by highways into market towns. These people pay rents and taxes and live within the state system in hierarchal societies that are dominated by powerful feudal, political, or military authority. Unlike in the mountain areas, leaders in qalang societies have their status bestowed on them by birth or through economic or political means.

Pakistan's military and intelligence elite, who are overwhelmingly from the qalang areas and are the ultimate instruments of the state, consider bin Laden and his affiliates, al Qaeda and the Taliban, as terrorists. They loathed bin Laden not only because he was on top of the wanted list of the United States for the 9/11 attacks, but because he had wrought death and destruction in Pakistan as well. Although the Taliban were patronized by Pakistani intelligence in the 1990s, as "our boys," after 9/11, the 180 degree turn against them as Islamabad was pressured into getting in line with U.S. policy, resulted in a complicated and bitter relationship.

For this reason, bin Laden's voyage from nang into qalang society may not have been entirely voluntary. It is likely that at some point, Pakistani intelligence successfully convinced him to move as their "guest" to one of their "safe houses" there -- which may explain reports that bin Laden arrived in Abbottabad as long as six years ago. He was now vulnerable because he was at the mercy of his hosts -- who would have seen him not as a guest to be honored, but as a commodity or asset to be bartered for gain with the Americans at the right time.

Nang people, on the other hand, make up bin Laden's natural constituency. They live in scarcely populated mountains that are largely inaccessible to the central government. They have a pastoral economy that depends on goats and camels, and do not pay rents or taxes. Their societies exist outside the state's legal systems, yet are egalitarian. Elders must earn their status through acts of honor and bravery, and problems are adjudicated by the jirga, or counsel of wise men or elders.

More than anything, the nang prize their freedom. Even under British rule, the authority's jurisdiction rarely exceeded more than 100 yards on either side of the main roads. In the most profound sense, the nang people were probably among the freest in the world.

NASEER AZAM/AFP/Getty Images

 

Akbar Ahmed is Ibn Khaldun Chair of Islamic Studies at American University and the author of Journey into America: The Challenge of Islam.

ITONLYSTANDSTOREASON

11:58 PM ET

May 7, 2011

Duh

This cultural division is older than the US itself; I find it hard to believe that it is unknown within the State Dept. and the Pentagon, even if it has been given insufficient weight.

 

INJUNTROUBLE

12:51 AM ET

May 8, 2011

Creating a Pashtunistan is the only solution

The only viable and sustainable solution is to give the Pashtuns their own country (where they can kill each other in peace). This means partitioning both Afghanistan and Pakistan and creating a new Pashtunistan in between. The rest of Afghanistan can be ruled by the Northern Alliance with an American base to protect it.

What remains of Pakistan will basically be Sind and Punjab. All foreign troops should the leave Pakistan and the new Pashtunistan. They can either live together in peace or fight with each other - the world should just leave them alone with their Pashtunwali or any other kind of wali.

 

JAHAN

4:32 AM ET

May 8, 2011

Mr Ahmed is Misleading Americans

Akbar Ahmed is not son of the Pashtun soil but came to Pashtun area from India as refugee. Though, he learned Pashto which he is dangerously using it to malign Pashtuns and especially Pashtuns of Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) which are ruled by Islamabad Political Agents under Frontier Crimes Regulations (FCR). FCR draconian law which means that if anyone of the Wazir form Waziristan or any agency in FATA commit a crime, the whole family and sometimes the entire village including children, women and seniors are put in Jail. And it was not only happening in Akbar Ahmed’s time when he was Political Agent there but it is still happening in 2011. Pashtuns want to liberate from this FCR and President Zardari promised Pashtuns that they will be free of FCR which means that they will have vote in Provincial/local Assembly and no Islamabad Political Agent can detain their entire families. But Pakistan Army and ISI resisted and President Zardari was made silent because they want to use that area under Haqani network against US/NATO and Afganstan.

Pashtuns especially people in far flung areas like Waziristan do not know about the world politics. I remember when Hakaimullah became No 1 after the death of Baithullah Masud was asked by a Canadian reporter that what he will do if Pakistan Army attacks him. His reply was ‘ I will destroy everything that comes in front of me even UPTO Kohat’ – a small city near Peshawar. His reply stunned me because he did not had world vision and even he did not know the geography of his province and it is the case with most of the Pashtuns. Pashtuns of Pakhtunkhwa province, Pashtuns of Quetta (where Pakistan Army hides Mula Mohammad Umar and the entire Quetta Shura) and epically the Pashtuns of FATA are the worst victims of OBL and Taliban.

In the aftermath Pashtun nationalist leaders in both Nang and Qalang area such as Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Baluchistan regions and FATA are reacting positively to the news that Al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden has been killed. Many social and political leaders in the region near the border with Afghanistan are hoping that it will force Pakistan’s military establishment to change its policy of "strategic depth" in the Pashtun-dominated tribal belt.

Mian Iftikhar Hussain, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa provincial minister for information, told RFE/RL's Radio Mashaal that bin Laden's elimination was "a really a positive development" because "the symbol of global terrorism had been eliminated." “Terrorism is a mindset, and we have to work hard to defeat this mindset," Hussain said. "Osama was the main figure behind the network that funded terrorism; therefore it will make a lot of difference." Hussain, who lost his only son in July 2010 in a Taliban attack represents the Pashtun nationalist Awami National Party (ANP) that came under attacks from pro-Al-Qaeda Taliban militants. According to the Bacha Khan Research Center, the Taliban has killed more than 400 ANP workers ( and 100s of elders in FATA) since 2006.
Raza Muhammad Raza, a former senator and spokesman of the Pakhtunkhwa Milli Awami Party (PkMAP) Quetta, has said that in the decade since the September 11, 2001, attacks, Pakistani officials had stuck to the claim that bin Laden was either in Afghanistan or in the rugged mountains in the tribal regions on the border."But he was found and killed in Abbottabad, close to the training academy of Pakistan’s Army, (US west point)" Raza told RFE/RL. "If Pakistan can assure the world and its neighbors that it will not support and protect terrorist forces anymore, it can avoid serious challenges to peace and prosperity in the region. "The intelligence service and the army never follow the policies of the elected governments," he continued. "Instead, they pursued their own so-called strategic interests. It is high time that these policies are altogether reviewed and completely changed. Pakistan has reached a dangerous turn." The decade-long war in the Pashtun areas along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border has left hundreds killed and wounded and thousands more displaced.

Bashir Bilour, senior minister of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province, has said in the Peshawar assembly that "Pashtuns did not know about suicide attacks. It was Arabs under the leadership of Osama (supported and shielded by ISI) who gave suicide jackets to the Pashtun children."Bilour said bin Laden and his supporters had "killed the mothers, sisters, and children of the Pashtuns" and that he felt a sense of relief at the news of bin Laden's death.

John Adams says, “Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclinations, or the dictates of our passion, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence.” Therefore, Akbar Ahmed need to tell the full truth that OBL and Taliban are being supported and shielded by the Pakistan military which still trying to play double game with the US. They are earning 1.5 billion dollars an year from the US and making Taliban and religious extreme stronger to strategically use them against US/NATO.

American people, administration and institutions needs to beware of people like Akbar Ahmed and Pakistan Army as I doubt that Pakistan Army will provide Mula Umar and Aiman Al Zawahiri to US from FATA to earn the goodwill of American and Akbar Ahmed will plead their case. Will Americans be deceived once again by such gifts (Mula Umar and Aiman Al Zawahiri ) and tactics by Pakistan? Will Americans understand that Pashtuns are not foe but friends? As we both are the victims of the same ideology and expansions agenda of Pakistan. Will Americans rise to the occasion at this point in time of historic moments in world history? Will you?

 

SWK

4:49 AM ET

May 8, 2011

now what...

Mr. Ahmed does a great job of helping set our schema, or baseline, as it pertains to our westernized views on dealing with Afghanistan. Undoubtedly Coalition Forces have floundered due to misconceptions, lack of understanding, lack of a unified direction, and countless other issues that all derive from the core differences between our cultures - and more importantly our failure to understand the impact those differences make.

We, as Americans have a history of persistently exerting our views on others until they conform to what we see as the standard. In large part, Afghanistan has proved no different. As to policy however, I think our key misstep has not come from cultural ignorance. But rather from choosing to side with Kabul leadership or the qalang, rather than the Pashtu leadership, or the nang.

Furthermore, and perhaps more importantly, is the question of what to do now? After a decade here, trust me when I say that "we" know the history. And I don't question our knowledge of tribal dynamics - we do have all the information. What we don't have however, is the wisdom to know what to do with that Knowledge.

So to you first person experts on Afghanistan, Pakistan, Pashtunistan, Loya Paktia, and everything else in between - I pose the question: Where do we go from here?

SwK

 

MARTY MARTEL

5:25 AM ET

May 8, 2011

Pakistani government has U. S. by the throat

Code of the hills’ is yet another diversion propagated by Pakistan-apologists like Akbar Ahmad.

Witness how Hillary Clinton’s U. S. is vigorously defending U. S. - Pakistan alliance in public forums.

Pakistani government has U. S. by the throat. US can NOT use its aid leverage to force Pakistan to stop supporting terrorist groups who kill US/NATO troops in Afghanistan day in and day out because US needs Pakistan’s help in ferrying supplies to those very US/NATO troops.

Furthermore Pakistan has spread a biggest malarkey with U. S. connivance that ’nuclear weapons are in danger of falling in the hands of Islamic fundamentalists if Pakistani government collapses’.

How can Pakistan be in danger of falling to the Islamic fundamentalists if Pakistani Army and ISI are SPONSORING those very Islamic fundamentalists led by Osama bin Laden, Haqqani, Mullah Omar and Hafiz Saeed as reported by ambassador Patterson?

Previous US ambassador Anne Patterson to Pakistan, wrote in a secret review in 2009 that ‘Pakistan's Army and ISI are covertly SPONSORING four militant groups - Haqqani‘s HQN, Mullah Omar‘s QST, Al Qaeda and LeT - and will not abandon them for any amount of US money‘, as diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks show.

Ambassador Patterson had NO reason to mislead her own State Department and U. S. government.

US just keeps deliberately ignoring Taliban’s Pakistani connections in fueling and sustaining Afghan insurgency as reported by Matt Waldman in ‘The sun in the sky‘ on 6/13/2010, corroborated by WikiLeaks leaks on 7/25/2010 and then further corroborated by Chris Alexander, Canadian ambassador to Afghanistan from 2003 to 2005 and Deputy Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General for Afghanistan from 2005 until 2009 in his article on 7/30/2010 titled ‘The huge scale of Pakistan‘s complicity‘.

Let us see if U. S. once again allows Pakistan to get away with a whitewash and a wink and a nod with few more billions in aid to boot after finding out that Osama bin Laden was sheltered so close to the heart of Pakistani government.

 

SWK

7:42 AM ET

May 8, 2011

now what... part 2

Political posturing and finger pointing run rampant... History should be revisited often and analyized so as to learn from the past. And although practitioners must also be academians in today's robust, diverse, and complex battlefield. I can't help but raise a weary eyebrow at what I suppose to be armchair quarterbacks.

How we define Pakistan's role in the issue will, in the end, varry only in degrees to the same end. No matter from which direction you approach the problem, Pakistan is a key player in the events unfolding in Afghanistan. And although I will not go so far as to call Pakistan irrelevent to the way ahead, to the Leadership and Soldiers on the ground in Afghansitan, it is quite simply a bridge too far.

How do we unite Afghanistan, in spite of Pakistan? That is the real issue at hand for 99% of the people who can impact the efforts being put forth.

SwK

 

JAHAN

8:51 AM ET

May 8, 2011

US, India and Afghans/Pashtuns Alliance after OBL death

SWK and Akbar Ahmed both are advocating for the sinking boat of Pakistan and pleading its case on the price of Pashtuns and Afghans. As I have said earlier that they are not Pashtuns and dramatize the Pashtuns proverbs and history and make their case. Till very recent, Americans and other westerners made hero of Greg Mortenson of the New York best seller book ‘Three Cups of Tea’ while he built some fabricated schools for the people of Agha Khan Ismaili Muslims in Pakistan and Afghanistan and received over $60 Million dollars in donations. Mortenson was at his peak of lie when he created a drama in his book that he was abducted by Pashtuns of Waziristan. Thanks to 60 Minutes show last month that he was exposed and disgraced.

Now SWK and Akbar Ahmed want us to believe that all roads to the US/NATO successes in Afghanistan goes through GHQ/ISI, Islamabad. US has tried that for so long and they have learned the double nature of Pakistan.

It is a prime time to give a chance to the political, civil and tribal leadership of Pashtuns on both of Pakistan and Afghanistan without Pakistan role. They may include Pashtun leadership of Afghanistan, Afrasiab Khattak of Awami National Party, Mahmood Khan of Quetta, and those Taliban who are not under the influence of ISI. My Friend, Farid Zakrya of CNN is pleading that India can also provide significant leadership to bring peace on Pashtun land after OBL death. I agree with him as over 300,000 Khudai Khidmatgaars ( volunteers) under the leadership of Badsha Khan (frontier Gandhi) stood with Gandhi to liberate India from British.

I suggest that US, India and Afghans/Pashtuns (themselves) can liberate Pashtuns from Pakistan hegemony if united and don’t be deceived by people like SWK and Akbar Ahmed and institutions like ISI.

 

SWK

11:15 AM ET

May 8, 2011

just for the sake of arguing

Feeling a bit chagrined, I resolve to comment on Jahan's response, if only because nothing else productive occupies my time on this lazy Sunday evening.

Firstly Jahan, perhaps I wasn't clear enough when I eluded to to my belief that one of America's greatest mistakes in Afghanistan was to side with the very westernized minority of Kabul, rather than the Pashtun population center in and around Loya Paktia. Though Karzai happens to be a Pashtu, the commonly held perception still persists that the Government of the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan is that very distant thing in Kabul that does nothing for the people. A perception that perhaps could be alleviated if the Tribal and Elder system were given a larger stake in official happenings.

Secondly, I believe I was quite clear when I stated that Afghanistan must find a way to unit IN SPITE of Pakistani influence. Did you misconstrue that to mean I was pro-Pakistan?

Wishing you a grand Sunday Janan,

SwK

 

JAHAN

4:24 PM ET

May 8, 2011

just for the sake of arguing

SWK, we are victim of cold war as well as the post cold war wrath of both friends and foe. People have invaded us and then say that Pashtuns are uncivilized as we was said by Sir Winston Churchill when British Army invaded us, as he was one of the journalist . We are not much fighters to defeat everyone, however, we are living on the land from centuries and cannot go to the plains of Punjab or fight with US or others. We feel that Pashtuns of Afghanistan and Pakistan are peaceful and are very much aligned with regional and ultra regional powers to contribute to peace. And what Pashtuns say, they deliver. They don’t play double game as Punjab, Pakistan or ISI is doing.
I agree that Present Karzai’s govt is under the influence of Northern alliance but we hope Pashtuns will create good working relationship with our minorities in Afghanistan.

Thanks for your comments and have a peaceful time at the end of the weekend as well as wish you the best times in coming week. BTW if you have time, watch the film on Pashtun elders by a very dear friend Teri Mcluhan who is living in Newyork. http://www.thefrontiergandhi.com
Appology if I have become personal to you or Akbar Ahmed.

Jahan Zeb
Hamilton -Canada

 

ASHTONKAYE

7:25 PM ET

May 8, 2011

I like the idea Pashtuistan

The idea INJUNTROUBLE suggested is actually a very interesting idea i' ve never heard before. while it might not be viable at this moment, it would be interesting if there was at least a discussion on this idea or similar solution to the tribal problems of afganistan and pakistan.

 

DDSNAIK

12:53 PM ET

May 9, 2011

I 3rd this notion and...

... pose the question of why stop there ? Is it so outlandish to consider reverting back to 2 countries (Afghanistan and India) instead of 3 (an artificially created-in-Cambridge Pakistan) ? Didn't it make more sense to leave the Afghans/Pashtuns to their chosen medieval way of life (to which they have a right) and not haphazardly integrate them economically and politically with relatively more moderate/modern societies of Punjabs and Sindhis and Co. ?

 

ACCUMEN72

5:25 AM ET

May 10, 2011

Interesting

It seems a very odd choice for Bin Laden and his cohorts - a place integrated into the system - when he could have chosen a more secludeded canvas art hideaway. Reports today suggest that the Pakistan governemnt are launching an enquiry into how he was able to live there undetected for so long. It seems this story is going to run and run...

 

CATHERINE JEFFERSON

8:07 AM ET

May 12, 2011

How is it freedom when half the population is enslaved?

This columnist asserts that the people of these areas are "free". Perhaps if they're male, they're free, although I have my doubts. But women in this society and culture are no better than chattel slaves. I'd give this article more weight if the writer had not seemed utterly oblivious to that fact.

 

GURINGO

3:00 AM ET

May 13, 2011

(quote) "People who see

(quote) "People who see themselves through the lens of honor will respond positively if they are treated honorably."

Actually, people who see themselves thru the lens of honor need to be fast-tracked back to the stone-age, where they can spend the next thousand years coming to terms with how the rest of the world couldn't care less about them or think less of their ludicrous, antiquated, virulent sense of honor and shame.

 

TODDBURME

5:13 PM ET

May 13, 2011

Serparate again?

Does anyone else have an issue with the fact that every part of the globe including ours has separate territories pushed together, and these folks can’t get along. We cannot create a separate government for every ethnic group, sub group etc. Yes these folks don't like those folk. But at some point people need to get along. Rather than figure out how to give them their own rule, we could educate them. People with higher education are less likely to shoot their neighbors over perceived differences. I understand that they did not choose to be governed together but after this much time maybe we could get over it and move on. I am asking too much I know.

 

LOVECOFFM

2:37 AM ET

June 4, 2011

The Code

The only viable and sustainable solution is to give the Pashtuns their own country (where they can kill each other in peace). This means partitioning both Afghanistan and Pakistan and creating a new Pashtunistan in between. The rest of Afghanistan can be ruled by the Northern Alliance with an American base to protect it. pest control In the aftermath Pashtun nationalist leaders in both Nang and Qalang area such as Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Baluchistan regions and FATA are reacting positively to the news that Al-Qaeda founder Osama bin Laden has been killed. Many social and political leaders in the region near the border with Afghanistan are hoping that it will force Pakistan’s military establishment to change its policy of "strategic depth" in the Pashtun-dominated tribal belt.

 

MACORTEZ461

2:46 AM ET

June 4, 2011

Really?

American people, administration and institutions needs to beware of people like Akbar Ahmed and Pakistan Army as I doubt that Pakistan Army will provide Mula Umar and Aiman Al Zawahiri to US from FATA to earn the goodwill of American and Akbar Ahmed will plead their case. Will Americans be deceived once again by such gifts (Mula Umar and Aiman Al Zawahiri ) and tactics by Pakistan? Will Americans understand that Pashtuns are not foe but friends? As we both are the victims of the same ideology and expansions agenda of Pakistan. Will Americans rise to the occasion at this point in time of historic moments in world history? home security Now SWK and Akbar Ahmed want us to believe that all roads to the US/NATO successes in Afghanistan goes through GHQ/ISI, Islamabad. US has tried that for so long and they have learned the double nature of Pakistan.