Fighting Words

From Gingrichian Red-baiting to Palinian Tea-Partyism, a quick primer on the GOP's foreign-policy punch lines.

BY JOSHUA E. KEATING | MAY 11, 2011

MITT ROMNEY

"Given President Obama's glaring domestic policy missteps, it is understandable that the public has largely been blinded to his foreign policy failings. In fact, these may have been even more damaging to America's future. He fought to reinstate Honduras's pro-Chávez president while stalling Colombia's favored-trade status. He castigated Israel at the United Nations but was silent about Hamas having launched 7,000 rockets from the Gaza Strip. His policy of 'engagement' with rogue nations has been met with North Korean nuclear tests, missile launches and the sinking of a South Korean naval vessel, while Iran has accelerated its nuclear program, funded terrorists and armed Hezbollah with long-range missiles. He acceded to Russia's No. 1 foreign policy objective, the abandonment of our Europe-based missile defense program, and obtained nothing whatsoever in return."

-Washington Post op-ed, July 6, 2010

In his 2008 run, the former Massachusetts governor's foreign policy views tracked closely with those of the George W. Bush administration, frequently describing radical Islam as America's most pressing security threat. Sometimes he even seemed more Bush than Bush: during one debate, he suggested that the United States "double Guantanamo." This time around, Romney has attacked the Obama administration's foreign policy for being "unprepared and without direction," particularly evident in the decision to "[follow] the French" into Libya. In the Washington Post op-ed, he argued that the New START arms control treaty with Russia was the administration's worst foreign policy mistake.

MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images; Darren McCollester/Getty Images; Steve Pope/Getty Images; Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images; Steve Pope/Getty Images; Alex Wong/Newsmakers; Steve Pope/Getty Images; PHILIPPE LOPEZ/AFP/Getty Images; Ron Sachs-Pool/Getty Images; Alex Wong/Getty Images; GALI TIBBON/AFP/Getty Images; Darren Hauck/Getty Images; David Becker/Getty Images

 

Joshua E. Keating is an associate editor at Foreign Policy.

ETHEKYAA

6:13 PM ET

May 11, 2011

Ron Paul is from Texas, not Arizona

Santorum has inspired me with his neo-traditionalist conservative leanings in the past. Unfortunately, his foreign policy record is nothing but Bush-lite.

Aside from Huntsman, I would say the all the Republican candidates are either neo-cons or populist libertarians. Not so good for American foreign policy.

 

P.J. AROON

10:56 AM ET

May 12, 2011

Corrected

We've corrected Ron Paul's state. Thanks for noticing the error.

--FP copy chief

 

KIRBANG

8:15 AM ET

May 12, 2011

SPAM

Why is every response page littered with SPAM? This speaks to the seriousness of the publication. It takes no time for someone to delete these posts and block the serial offenders. Let them buy ad space.

 

COMETLINEAR

1:36 PM ET

May 12, 2011

The Republican candidates are all clowns

And that's being generous.

 

PJW5552

2:58 PM ET

May 12, 2011

GOP candidates are funny!

Gingrich is a funny fear monger. Be afraid of Shari law. Why exactly? According to Gingrich Obama is a secular socialist. What is a secular socialist? You can't just be a socialist anymore, you have to be a secular (Godless) socialist. I guess having this undefined label attached to Obama is suppose to make him scarier and more frightening. If he isn't a Muslim, and undocumented, foreign born national he is at least a "secular socialist". Shouldn't we be afraid of what we don't know or understand? Gingrich seems to think so. It's funny how people embrace that too.

Isn't it funny how Gingrich and several of his GOP Colleagues think Israel is next to Godliness. How dare Obama castigate Israel. Right, killing Palestinians, taking their land, restricting their human rights, imposing apartheid conditions on them, locking them up without charge, killing unarmed people on ships going to Gaza -- what's not to like about that? How dare Obama criticize Israel, it's doing a GREAT job without his help.

Huckabee thinks Arabs living in the territory should live elsewhere. Isn't that a great solution for peace -- just go over there and tell the Palestinians, "hey guys, you've lived here long enough, now just leave". Isn't that what Israel did to the Palestinians now in Southern Lebanon? Didn't those Palestinians form a group called Hezbollah? How's that working out for them? Maybe Huckabee has the ticket, we don't kick them out of their homes by force, bulldoze them down and force them to leave we just tell them to move very politely. I can see that working, can't you?

Bachmann believes we are blessed because of our support of Israel and if we reject Israel we will be cursed. Of course she is right. AIPAC will curse whatever US leader refuses to do what they tell him. Don't you recall what Begin did to Carter? Upset with the Camp David Accords, Begin helped funneled arms to Iran in exchange for their not releasing the US Embassy hostages. Anything to hurt Carter's re-election chances. You don't want to irritate those Israeli's, they don't just curse you, they work to get rid of you..

Have you noticed how most GOP candidates have a similar view of the world. Do what I tell you or else. Palin of course takes it full throttle -- "kill 'um. With Bullies, might make right". Really, and if we use power and force to get what "we want" what does that make us? Oh yeah, liberators, freedom fighters -- it's all in how you view the world don't you know.

Is it just me or does Romney just seem totally lost. He goes around saying "I can't figure out what Obama is doing in Libya". Really? Try reading. By the way, you may learn we are not "in Libya". Romney also thinks Obama should never have agreed to the Salt treaty with Russia. I still can't figure out if Romney realizes the Salt Treaty was approved by a 71 to 26 vote in the Senate. Maybe Romney thinks the Salt Treaty has something to do with the US purchase of Russian salt, who knows that goes on in that mind of his.

I thought Cain probably know more than it appears. He said Bush made the Middle East Revolutions possible, and I think he is right. Imagine if Gaddafi had kept his nuclear program instead of terminating it because Bush scared him. Good-bye Benghazi, revolution -- over. Hossni Mubarak certainly wouldn't have been so hated by his own people if he wasn't forced to do whatever GW Bush told him to do. It was Bush who insisted Mubarak supply Fatah with weapons after Hamas won the elections in Gaza. After all, Bush only supported democracy when it resulted in the people he wanted getting elected. When Hamas found out they kicked Fatah out of Gaza. Bush also put pressure on Mubarak to close the Rafah border with Gaza and not support Hamas. These were part of the reason Egyptians hated Mubarak and the result was his ouster. Bush II, ME 0. And what about those Syrians? Wasn't it Bush who created the conditions by what he did in Iraq, displacing millions of Iraqi's into Syria. Talk about killing two birds with one stone. Invade Iraq, destabilize Syria. Who would have thunk it. Bush III, ME 0.

I'm still not sure about how Bush facilitated Tunisia's,Bahrain's, Yemen's, Saudi Arabia or Algeria's revolutions, but I'm willing to concede that Bush managed to create instability throughout the entire middle East region. If not by design at least by consequence. and that should count for something, right?

What is most humorous is these GOP hopefuls don't believe that are own survival through that time was just dumb luck. They all want to return to the same policies as GW Bush had where we tell everyone in the world what to do, let Israel do whatever it wants and invade and/or kill off anyone who we dislike. I will admit it is black humor, but funny none-the-less.

 

OK RIBEIRO

2:08 PM ET

June 11, 2011

Fighting Words

From Gingrichian Red-baiting to Palinian Tea-Partyism, a quick primer on the GOP's foreign-policy punch lines. Santorum has inspired me with his neo-traditionalist conservative leanings in the past. Unfortunately, his foreign policy record is nothing but Bush-lite. Aside from Huntsman, I would say the all the Republican candidates are either neo-cons or populist libertarians. Not so good for American foreign policy. skin Why is every response page littered with SPAM? This speaks to the seriousness of the publication. It takes no time for someone to delete these posts and block the serial offenders. Let them buy ad space..