Guilty by Association

It's not just famous artists like Ai Weiwei and Nobel laureate Liu Xiaobo. In China's ongoing crackdown against dissidents and critics, the government is on a rampage against their families, too.

BY RACHEL BEITARIE | MAY 17, 2011

BEIJING — On a quiet block in western Beijing where otherwise only a few retirees can be seen walking their dogs or trimming their bushes, one building is under constant and conspicuous surveillance. A plainclothes policeman stands guard before an entranceway, while another keeps watch sitting inside a small cabin.

The unlikely object of the Chinese state's attention in this instance is Liu Xia, a painter, poet, and photographer -- and the wife of Nobel Peace Prize laureate Liu Xiaobo. Guilty by association, she has been under house arrest, with almost no contact with the outside world, since November 2010, when her husband's award was announced. No one has heard from Liu since February, and her friends are increasingly worried about her health. Still, there is no sign that the authorities are planning to relent.

Related

Cultural Revolutionaries
Ai Weiwei isn't the only contemporary Chinese artist making Beijing nervous.

Liu's arrest underscores a peculiar aspect to the recent Chinese crackdown on political dissidents that has seen the detention of dozens of prominent activists, intellectuals, and artists. Authorities are increasingly targeting not just critics of the ruling party, but their family members, including spouses, parents, and even young children. While the dissidents gain the headlines, their relatives are punished out of the spotlight. Though the wife of jailed artist Ai Weiwei was recently allowed a visit her husband, she could be next in line to lose her freedom.

It's a punitive strategy that seeks to exploit Chinese traditions of filial piety. For China's dissidents, family is often both a source of strength and weakness: Chinese families tend to be close and highly involved in each other lives, and they take seriously the promise to stick together through thick and thin. The government, aware of these close ties, is using them to put more pressure on activists.

It also bears echoes of the Cultural Revolution-era, when many Chinese families were torn apart as spouses and children were forced to denounce loved ones labeled by the authorities as capitalist traitors and were sometimes forced to take part in their public humiliation. Today's China is again making a policy of manipulating familial love and devotion to suppress any political challenges.

"One of the more troubling trends we see in recent years has been for the government to more directly involve family members," observes Joshua Rosenzweig, a senior researcher at the Dui Hua Foundation, a U.S.-based organization dedicated to improving human rights in China. "We see surveillance, constant harassment, even extended house arrests. These all happened before, but now they have become routine" -- as in the case of Liu Xia. Rosenzweig adds, "Legal procedure has become irrelevant" in the Communist Party's quest to maintain stability. Under Chinese law, there is no procedure that allows for a person to be held indefinitely under house arrest without charges or a police investigation. "To put it simply, families are being held hostage," says Rosenzweig.

Zeng Jinyan would concur. She has been under constant surveillance and subject to frequent house arrests ever since 2001, when she met her husband, AIDS activist Hu Jia, who is now serving a three-and-a-half-year sentence for "subversion of state power." Zeng was a student when they met, and she says she never imagined her life turning out the way it did. "I thought I'll graduate, find a job, and marry. I planned on a simple life and was hoping I could have enough time and money to travel the world," she tells me in a telephone interview. But she has since become an acclaimed activist in her own right, detailing her everyday life under the party's watchful eye on her blog and Twitter account. In 2007, Time magazine included her on its list of the world's 100 most influential people. Clearly, the regime's strategy backfired in this case.

MIKE CLARKE/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: EAST ASIA
 

Rachel Beitarie is a freelance writer in China.

HITOMI

1:13 PM ET

May 18, 2011

Hitomi

Thank god someone finally wrote an extended report on this twisted, heinous practice by the Chinese government. How can anyone countenance a government which detains, locks up, or tortures people it outright acknowledges have done no wrong, who are not even implicated in a crime, even as forces them to be silent and accept its decision? When the Chinese apologists pathetically cite the 87% approval rating, does it apply to this too? Perhaps PEW should ask in the next poll: "Do you think 87% of China approves of locking up families, punishing brothers, sisters, parents, sons and daughters and perhaps cousins, for the puported 'crimes' of one person? Or is this, you know, just kinda necessary."

That the Chinese government is so willing to abuse a cultural concept as crucial as the family in Chinese tradition to pursue its atrocious campaign against contemporary members of the hundred flowers tells us everything we need to know about the validity of political arguments based on "cultural differences". All governments surely use and abuse the cultures which interrelate with them, but the Chinese government's cynicism and viciousness, the domestic abuse of its own culture, knows no equal. I think the flag of the new China should be an unwashed "wife-beater".

 

NEWDAY

11:49 AM ET

May 19, 2011

filial piety.

Thank you, I too am very grateful for the effort to put into perspective why and how the Chinese Government have chosen to so harshly torment Liu Xia, the wife of Liu Xiaobo and the family members of other dissidents.

From the West’s perspective the "guilty by association" tactics are not just immeasurably cruel; they are criminal offense as our judicial system does not place importance on family ties or associations when considering an individual’s actions in a court of law or punishment.

Yet even within China, are not these “guilty by association” tactics unintelligible--a suicidal tendency to the long term sustainability of their civilisation? Do not the filial piety punishments create hatred, and lack of trust in the hearts of the people to those leading the government's policy?

We do not hear much of these anguished complaints, only a few brave hearted activists. Yet without doubt most of those within China could not possible condone such suffering to innocent family members or do they? We would like to believe no human being could condone this, not really. So how much longer can the majority of China’s people remain silent accepting the unacceptable?

 

FSILBER

2:53 PM ET

May 22, 2011

Communists have always done this.

I suppose communist countries have always done this. At least it may give them some leverage when it's time to deal with Islamic terrorists who are ready themselves to die.

 

MATT PETELICKY

6:06 PM ET

June 14, 2011

How can anyone countenance a

How can anyone countenance a government which detains, locks up, or tortures people it outright acknowledges have done no wrong, who are not even sázkové kanceláre implicated in a crime, even as forces them to be silent and accept its decision? When the Chinese apologists pathetically cite the 87% approval rating, does it apply to this too? Perhaps PEW should ask in the next poll: "Do you think 87% of China approves of locking up families, punishing brothers, sisters, parents, sons and daughters and perhaps cousins, for the puported 'crimes' of one person.