Friend Request

Barack Obama has been saying the right things about democracy in the Arab world. Bahrain, a key U.S. ally, will be the test of whether he really means them.

BY JAMES TRAUB | MAY 27, 2011

When President Barack Obama gave his Middle East speech last week, I was listening to hear what he would say about Bahrain. I know that Bahrain is way down on the list of exciting Arab conflicts, but it poses a peculiarly excruciating problem for American policymakers: the problem of the autocratic ally. It was easy for Obama to praise the protesters who toppled regimes in Egypt and Tunisia, or to condemn the brutal crackdowns in Libya and Syria, where regime change would now serve U.S. interests. But Bahrain is a key U.S. ally and the host of the Navy's Fifth Fleet, which enables the United States to project power in the Persian Gulf.

Obama, to his credit, faced the issue squarely and said the right things. He rejected a policy based upon the "narrow pursuit" of national interest, insisting that American support for "universal rights" will be "a top priority that must be translated into concrete actions." He decried the "mass arrests and brute force" used by the Bahraini regime against peaceful protesters and added -- to applause from his audience of State Department officials -- that "you can't have real dialogue when parts of the opposition are in jail." Several days later, the president backed up his words by designating Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg as presidential envoy to Bahrain and dispatching him and a team of other officials to Manama, where they relayed the administration's concerns to King Hamad al-Khalifa and his most senior advisors. But what will Obama do if the king calls his bluff? Nobody knows, including the administration itself.

Like the other oil states in the Gulf, Bahrain is ruled by a conservative Sunni dynasty with scant regard for democracy or human rights and sufficient wealth to buy social peace. Bahrain, however, has less oil than the others, which has made it more restive; the Khalifa dynasty, which has ruled the kingdom since the 18th century, has responded to the unrest with slightly more political experimentation than its brethren (which is not saying much).

But what also makes Bahrain distinctive is the fact that at least two-thirds of the population is Shiite, which has given a distinctly sectarian cast to the protest movement. Bahrain's Shiite population suffers from political and economic discrimination, including exclusion from government posts, gerrymandering that has reduced their political representation, and high unemployment. But both the ruling family and their vastly more powerful patrons, the Saudis, have demonized the critics as agents of Iran, seeking to extend its influence in the region through local Shiite populations. An indigenous protest movement has thus been conflated with a (very real) regional threat, thus making political compromise look like an act of surrender.

When discontent began sweeping the Arab world earlier this year, Bahrain already had a long history of protest, limited reform, and repression. King Hamad, who ascended to the throne in 1999, had first raised hopes among both Sunni and Shiite critics, and then disappointed them. The king largely reneged on promised constitutional reforms in 2002, prompting violent demonstrations and a harsh response by the security apparatus. This February, protesters occupied Pearl Square to once again demand an accountable state and a representative and empowered parliament. The regime was unsure how to respond, first forcibly clearing out the demonstrators in a sweep that lead to seven deaths, then offering negotiations with the crown prince, the leading "moderate" among the royal family. But the talks collapsed over demands that Bahrain's hated prime minister step down, and on March 14 the king "invited" a Saudi-led force to enter Bahrain to help suppress the protests.

The Saudi intervention marked the decisive end of discussion, as well as the beginning of a period of unprecedented brutality. Hundreds of opposition leaders have been jailed, and many have offered credible accounts of torture. Security forces have attacked doctors, hospitals, patients, and ambulances thought to be assisting protesters. Students at the University of Bahrain have been forced to sign a loyalty oath; those who refuse must leave the university, as hundreds have. Astonishingly, Bahrain is now the most repressive and violent state in the Gulf.

JOSEPH EID/AFP/Getty Images

 

James Traub is a contributing writer for the New York Times Magazine and author of, most recently, The Freedom Agenda. "Terms of Engagement," his column for ForeignPolicy.com, runs weekly.

JBIRDMENJ

11:55 AM ET

May 27, 2011

Democracy is not the solution

In Baharain, nor in Syria. We need to separate the issue of indivdual rights from the issues of governmental power. Democratic elections will not secure individual rights for Sunni Baharainis in a Shite led democracy any more than the opposite situation today, and should not be recocmmended.

Democracy only works, I believe, in countries with a common ethnic and religious ancestory, or where no groups are large enough to gain an advantage because of these attributes.

 

BASE

9:17 PM ET

May 27, 2011

I suppose you are correct but...

In the United States we have gotten used to conflating the term 'democracy' with the concept of a 'constitutional republic'. The idea of a democracy is really intended to include concepts where the minority is protected by a constitution - this is not, of course, democracy per se, but a true constitutional republic. This concept is essentially ignored everywhere in the Middle East. Very few minorities have any rights at all; except apparently in the countries where the are the ruling autocracy. Which is worse? A country where we have a repressive government that does what we (the US) wants at the expense of human rights, or a 'democracy' (in the literal sense) that does what is ultimately against our interests? We need to commit to one or the other and stand by it - otherwise we just look like assholes (i.e. - the status quo).

 

NICHOLAS WIBBERLEY

6:00 PM ET

May 28, 2011

The enigma of democracy

Democracies are not much suited to purposive foreign policy making, they need a loophole enabling the leader to act independently. From a US perspective, the ideal ME systems would be benevolent autocracies; autocratic enough to do deals and benevolent enough to keep the masses quiet.

 

BENJAMINFRANKLIN

1:01 AM ET

May 29, 2011

Witness Fiji

Exactly - witness Fiji, in which democracy meant the oppression of native born Indians by the slight Fijian majority. Oddly, the current dictatorship by Fijians is friendlier to the native born Indians than the democracy was.

 

BENJAMINFRANKLIN

1:03 AM ET

May 29, 2011

Protected minorities

Or as in the US, where reverence for the Constitution is almost a religion.

 

PULLER58

5:36 AM ET

May 30, 2011

No it's not

The term simply doesn't mean the same thing in the Middle East as it does in the US. To the people in the Middle East, it only allows the people to vote in radicals who then suspend elections.

 

CCOCOO

8:49 PM ET

May 27, 2011

Travel gives us a worthy and

Travel gives us a worthy and improving pleasure pleasure^Rosetta Stone Spanish.

 

JOHNNY ALEXANDER

1:19 PM ET

May 28, 2011

Bahrain

It's tough to believe Saudi Arabia fears Iran, it's much simpler to think US fears Iran. Saudi Arabia is really a US pawn, there could have been no mercenaries in Bahrain without US minoritiesexist to maintain the American naval base safe, if Bahrain people choose their very own future, they wouldn't choose their nation like a chess piece for all of us and it is imperialist worldwide ambitions.

People provide the Saudi Nobleman more credit than they deserve, that's like giving Karzai more credit than he warrants.

 

BENJAMINFRANKLIN

12:59 AM ET

May 29, 2011

Shiites versus Sunnis

The Saudis fear Iran because Saudia Arabia has Shiite citizens, and they are afraid that the Iranians will suborn them.

 

SJN111

12:54 AM ET

May 29, 2011

BAHRAIN

Some of your very basic information is not correct, anything that you then go on to deduce is automatically false.Statements such as: " Scant regard for human rights,", "Mass arrests"," Brutal force","reduced political representation", "high unemployment". Get some real figures and then right an article: eg : Unemployment is 3.5%: High ? Opposition have 18 out of 40 seats in Parliament: Reduced representation ?

 

BENJAMINFRANKLIN

12:57 AM ET

May 29, 2011

Arab policy

Let's face it - American foreign policy in the Arab world is what it always has been. We want to be friends with the rulers, though we will make an exception for someone with a history of terrorism against Americans and Europeans.

 

BENJAMINFRANKLIN

12:57 AM ET

May 29, 2011

Arab policy

Let's face it - American foreign policy in the Arab world is what it always has been. We want to be friends with the rulers, though we will make an exception for someone with a history of terrorism against Americans and Europeans.

 

DEMOFACTOR

8:45 AM ET

May 29, 2011

American response could be different...

It sad to see how power and money prevail on human rights and freedoms in all Arab countries. And, to the record, Bahrain is the one of those states. It became the most repressive and violent state in the Gulf nowadays.

Unfortunately, American Policy is not so straight forward when it comes to the human rights in oil rich countries. Could you imagine the same American response to such kind of brutality against democracy movements happening in any other places that do not have oil?

Probably, you would witness completely different response from American president and also from all kind of American News newspapers, TV channels and agencies.

 

SWALSH82

5:47 PM ET

May 29, 2011

Tough call

Yep, I completely agree that it is a tough call to make in the case of Bahrain. It is very easy to paise people on the one hand and then turn a blind eye on the other. Obama should be applauded for speaking out, not only with respect to the Libyan people but also he should stand up a little mor for the Syrian and Bahrainian people as well. The risk is if they go hard on Syria though, it could blow up into a whole middle east affair, hezbollah and all. How long will we sit and allow the ruling classes to live behind a glass balustrade while their people are subjected to living as a lower class??

 

PROQUESTIA

12:47 AM ET

May 30, 2011

Look at this way

Obama is busy greasing the NAFTA wheels, pandering to corporated interests (there was a large delegation of big corportions waiting for him in Brazil) outsourcing american jobs and bidding on Brazilian oil (which, since they have sugar cane ethanol, they don't need) karmaloop codes and generally having a great time while selling out american interests.

Amusing that his supporters decry american corporations and demonize the rich while their president is doing everything in his power to extend the reach of said corporations and their wealthy stockholders. He's a socialist when it comes to redistributing the middle class wealth and a plutocrat when it comes to pandering to the special interests and corporations. His followers will defend him to the death because they only listen to the one side of his mouth and ignore the other.

 

WGALLEGO680

10:07 PM ET

June 24, 2011

Friend Request

Barack Obama has been saying the right things about democracy in the Arab world. Bahrain, a key U.S. ally, will be the test of whether he really means them. Let's face it - American foreign policy in the Arab world is what it always has been. We want to be friends with the rulers, though we will make an exception for someone with a history of terrorism against Americans and Europeans. fishing boats Let's face it - American foreign policy in the Arab world is what it always has been. We want to be friends with the rulers, though we will make an exception for someone with a history of terrorism against Americans and Europeans..