Inpatients Abroad

How do you solve America's health-care woes? Outsource them.

BY CHARLES KENNY | MAY 30, 2011

One of the few things that Republican and Democratic politicians in the United States can agree upon today is that their country can no longer afford Medicare and Medicaid. In 2009, the U.S. government's principal health-care entitlement programs between them spent $876 billion -- an expenditure about the size of the entire economy of Mexico. The Congressional Budget Office projects that those costs will continue growing at 7 percent a year for at least the next decade, considerably outpacing GDP growth. And as the costs of Medicare and Medicaid have ballooned, the programs have become an explosive political issue. On Tuesday, May 24, Democratic candidate Kathy Hochul won a decisive upset in a Republican-leaning New York congressional district in a special election that was widely viewed as a referendum on Republicans' ambitious plan to overhaul Medicare.

It's not just the entitlement programs, either. Total health-care expenditures in the United States in 2009 topped $2.5 trillion --18 percent of GDP. And the efficiency of all that spending appears pretty low. According to World Bank data, Costa Rica and the United States have the same life expectancy (79 years), but Costa Ricans spend only 16 percent what Americans spend per citizen on health services.

That statistic, however, suggests a possible solution -- or at least a partial one -- to America's health-care woes. Maybe Medicare's services don't need to be cut, overhauled, or saved. Instead, they should be outsourced. The U.S. government could save billions by simply letting its citizens go abroad for their federally funded health care.

Medical tourism has a bad reputation in the United States, synonymous with doctors in Tijuana and St. Barts hawking cut-rate plastic surgery and taking a liberal hand with the prescription pad. But going abroad for treatment is already a big business, and an entirely legitimate one. The Bumrungrad International Hospital in Bangkok, for example, sees tens of thousands of American patients each year, part of an industry that brought 380,000 foreigners to Thailand for treatment in 2005 alone. U.S. patients are attracted not just by the low costs but also by the quality of treatment. The Bumrungrad hospital has international accreditation from the Joint Commission International, the global arm of a leading certifying organization for U.S. hospitals. And Americans have other options besides Thailand. India's Apollo hospital chain has a 99 percent success rate in the 50,000-plus cardiac surgeries it has done, equal to the performance of the best U.S. cardiac surgery centers.

And if the idea of going under a knife wielded by a foreign doctor worries you, you probably shouldn't go to a hospital in the United States, either. According to economists Aaditya Mattoo and Randeep Rathindran, there is a 25 percent chance that the physician you visit in a U.S. hospital was educated abroad -- and the great majority of those foreign-educated doctors now come from developing countries. It's not really a matter of the quality of the doctor who will treat you; it's just a question of where the treatment will happen.

SAEED KHAN/AFP/Getty Images

 

Charles Kenny is a senior fellow at the Center for Global Development, a Schwartz fellow at the New America Foundation, and author, most recently, of Getting Better: Why Global Development Is Succeeding and How We Can Improve the World Even More. "The Optimist," his column for ForeignPolicy.com, runs weekly.

DURAN

1:28 PM ET

May 30, 2011

duran

Outsourcing pateints would also require an increase in internationally accredited medical schools to train american and foriegn physicians. The AMA has sufficent political clout to prevent the outsourcing of the medical market and the foriegn accredidation of medical schools because of the monetary sacrifices this would mean for physicans. Although medical tourism may not considerably affect america's healthcare market, as stated in the article, this would still translate into pay cuts for physicians. With a excess of doctors being trained over seas operating at lower wages, hospitals could significantly cut costs without sacrifcing service by hiring internationally trained physician. Medical tourism would foster a new standard of global medical care, but it might also entail less conpensation for physicians. As a future physcian myself I, would not have any problems with this approach because of the growing need for diversity in the medical field. If it's beneficial to the patients health and quality of life, legislators should reconsider medicaid and medicare's policies since there is also an economic insentive for them to do so.

 

VAZIR MUKHTAR

4:26 PM ET

May 31, 2011

outsourcing healthcare

I suspect we will not soon see Medicare covering healthcare costs incurred abroad. If there are already physicians and surgeons gaming the system here, I can just hear various members of Congress expatiating on the dangers of reimbursing part of one's medical expenses incurred abroad. It's different with Social Security beause the benefit one receives is predetermined, irrespective of one's annual cost of living.

It is already possible, but not easy, for a foreign-trained doctor to practice in the US. At the time two of my friends immigrated to the US, they entered medical school here, after N-odd (I do not recall how long) years took their exams. One practices as a pathologist; the other, a surgeon. The situation may have changed (i.e., perhaps the number of years of study in an American med school has been reduced or perhaps all one need do is pass her/his exams and/or boards), but this thwarts the AMA spectre you raise.

I suspect that what we will see in the short term is more nurse practitioners handling the run-of-the-mill cases and physicians seeing newer patients only when the n.p. believes it necessary.

If the feds truly want to make more doctors available, one way is to pay for the candidate's education and then require a minimum of two years' service (at more than a resident's pay) in an area or community lacking in physicians.

I live in a community where fully two-thirds of the specialists in one branch of medicine are Indian or Pakistani and have trained abroad as far as I know. All the doctors I've seen are board certified and have been excellent.

The fly in the ointment is that the solution to American healthcare concerns lies in the hands of the Congress. They will ignore the law of unintended consequences, fail to budget so as to cover the costs of the new healthcare measures, exempt themselves and federal employees from the new system, and screw up the reforms, their best[?] intentions notwithstanding.

 

SANDWICHES5000

9:02 PM ET

May 31, 2011

JACKRT- That's precisely the

JACKRT- That's precisely the brand of ignorance that makes this proposition not feasible. In a country where 2/3 of the citizens don't even own passports and are ignorant about the rest of the world, it's doubtful that even if medical care was covered abroad people would actually pursue it. Also, due to the other reasons the author mentioned here (wanting to stay close to family and friends at the end of ones life.) Really, how many sick, old people want to travel to India to get a heart transplant?

And seriously, how can people in our government even sleep at night knowing that the citizens of what they claim to be the "best country in the world" have to travel far and wide to obtain affordable medical care. It's disgusting.

Obtaining medical care abroad is a like putting a small band aid on the large gaping wound that is the American health care system.

 

NICKCIN

2:46 AM ET

June 3, 2011

Outsourcing everything

We're outsourcing every single thing... it started with the jobs and now the patients... what's next? I love India, I love Indian people, I love their handmade jewelry, I love their food, but I am tired of losing jobs to India.

 

E-COMMERCE2U.COM

11:16 PM ET

May 30, 2011

Outsource it issue

Hi,

The outsource program for medical is one of alternative solution for US government to overcome their budget for medical expenses. It must meet the main objective to provide the cheapest and save medical treatment to the public before propose the outsource of medical program.

Regards,
used cars

 

LOLLOL

2:57 AM ET

June 3, 2011

who cares

It's a global world now, who cares...

 

RMDUENAS

9:54 AM ET

May 31, 2011

Not so clever

Why do policymakers keep going around the bush when it comes to solving the health care problem in the US?

If it could be outsourced, who would pay for the travel and lodging expenses?

If it could be outsourced, what would happen to the millions of workers of the health care industry in the US? Do we send them abroad to find jobs too?

One of the main problems are the insurance companies, but I guess their political lobby is so strong that no politician or lawmaker wants to recognize it. Why does an appendectomy costs more if performed on a patient with a private insurance than on a patient who has insurance from a big company? Why does an appendectomy costs more in the US than in Europe? What do they use in the US that is of better quality, and thus much more expensive than in the rest of the world?

If there were insurance systems where patients could actually choose their doctors, where for minor claims patients with incomes should pay first and then request reimbursement, and if there were procedures in place to combat and punish insurance companies abuses, then people would become more responsible about their health, about how much they spend on health care, and about keeping the insurance companies accountable.

They way it is now, the doctor writes a prescription, the patient gets the exam, or procedure, or medication; in most cases, the patient does not even know the basic information about his/her medical problem, goes home, and hopefully follows the treatment. He/shee is not made aware, and does not care about the costs. Costs are a matter to be literally "negotiated" between health care providers and insurance companies, without any one overseeing it or having a say. No wonder they have reached the proportions they have. THIS is what needs to be changed.

I once called my insurance to let them know that, from the documents I was receiving from a lab where I undertook some tests, it looked like the lab was billing the insurance company for the same service several times. I was told to stop meddling, as this was none of my business!!!! Well, it is MY business because, in the long run, the increase in health care primes and the ultimate unaffordability of the care will affect me and my family directly. But it seems that politicians do not think the same way. After all, they can always travel abroad to get better care. If nothing changes, then I hope I will be able to do the same too!

 

DDSNAIK

1:59 PM ET

May 31, 2011

Spot on, RMDuenas

I'm in health care (full disclosure) and not the ubiquitous greedy practitioner (take my word for it) but find what the insurance companies get away with in our country alternatively amusing and appalling.

It goes back to their incredibly outsized lobbies and marketing machinery (whose costs are obviously incorporated in the bottom line), combined with the perplexing acceptance, if not outright devotion, of our fellow citizens to the great health insurance industry. Very rarely can someone provide no real service at all and still command attention and have input in a process like the insurance giants do. They are the single greatest hurdle to cleaning up the health care mess in our country, make no mistake about it. Their obscene premiums and profit margins and subsequent legal obligations levied on providers drives up cost more than any lack of quality/inefficiency of records/greed of providers/etc., but somehow, that fact gets railroaded or ignored altogether.

If we could reign in these guys, half of our health care costs problem would be solved. Medicaid/Medicare might be saved or acceptably modified, and health care costs might not be quite the cause for stress that it is now.

I'd cite more specific figures and sources if I thought it would do any good - but will leave it as a rant instead

 

XTIANGODLOKI

4:11 PM ET

May 31, 2011

How about getting to the root of the problem?

Why is the US healthcare among the most expensive in the world, yet people are not receive the best care even when they are paying for more than citizens of other nations?

It's in the insurance companies' best interest to deny people healthcare. This contradicts the whole point of having quality healthcare system. IMO this is the root cause of the problem.

 

ABIMANYU

7:06 AM ET

June 1, 2011

Not that unusual

Well, the concept of medical tourism isn't a new thing, as such. India, for example, indulges in it. For those who haven't heard about it, think of it as a holiday package, that includes room/board, travel and what not. Except room and board will be in a hospital, and your holiday will be more about getting treatment at said hospital. The hospital draws up a sort of treatment package that will include cost of air travel and so on.

eg. http://www.indian-medical-tourism.com/

I don't know how effective this is, and I highly doubt it is of any use to someone who is critically ill and needs to placed in an ICU. But outsourcing patients is certainly not a radical thing.

 

BURRCDR

1:47 AM ET

June 2, 2011

The race to the bottom

What is the benefit of outsourcing to our own people beside decreasing cost? This is a misguided strategy that will only contribute to the undoing of the medical infrastructure in the US. The US has never had a monopoly on 1st world healthcare. It is easier for foreign practitioners to work in the US than any other 1st world country. It is also more financially lucrative. Allowing taxpayer money to flow overseas for health care shows there is no commitment on the part of the government to support the existence of the infrastructure that gave rise to many of these advanced technologies.

Is medical care a way to get rich or an essential public service?
Answering this question is at the heart of our cost containment problem. From the looks of TV commercials and ads elsewhere, there are many who are trying to tap the profit potential of health services. We speak of the benefits that our system has in saving those who would have died elsewhere but most of those great saves usually happen in not-for-profit institutions and if not, the technology or strategies used were almost certainly researched in a not-for-profit institution. The entrepreneurial model of health care delivery has by its very nature grown cost as profit-seekers attempt to maximize their market share. Outsourcing a few major elective procedures does nothing to fix this.

The downstream effect of outsourcing is the undoing of the cost-spreading strategies used in hospitals where high profit services like joint replacements help subsidize low profit services like inpatient medical care. Leaving institutions with all the cost but none of the revenue is not a viable long term solution. It is a recipe for the eventual destruction of the American health care system.

 

PASSEPARTOUT

2:35 AM ET

June 3, 2011

A solution

Medicare E, for everyone.

 

PETERLEE

10:23 AM ET

June 3, 2011

Medical Outsourcing

I don't think outsourcing is a viable solution. Healthcare by itself is relatively expensive and outsourcing it to another country does not help. It may even complicate things for patients as well as politically. For example hip replacement surgeries can be very expensive e.g.

http://www.diabeteshealthstudy.com

 

DAILYHUGHES

1:43 AM ET

June 8, 2011

The richest country in the world outsourcing?

The richest and most powerful country in the world is essentially forcing their tax paying citizens to get health care in foreign lands? I actually might be one of the few people who believe that the health care available in other countries may be on par or better than what is available in the United States, but it remains appalling. Whether you need a dental procedure done in Topeka, a chiropractor Seattle, or a knee replacement in Washington D.C., we pay enough taxes as citizens to support all of it. We shouldn't be forced to depend on other countries who are making the procedures more affordable. Health care deserves to be a right of every human, not just the rich, and this only shows how backward we have it. The rich should not be the only ones with access to the health and wellness.

 

DAILYHUGHES

1:44 AM ET

June 8, 2011

The richest country in the world outsourcing?

The richest and most powerful country in the world is essentially forcing their tax paying citizens to get health care in foreign lands? I actually might be one of the few people who believe that the health care available in other countries may be on par or better than what is available in the United States, but it remains appalling. Whether you need a dental procedure done in Topeka, a chiropractor Seattle, or a knee replacement in Washington D.C., we pay enough taxes as citizens to support all of it. We shouldn't be forced to depend on other countries who are making the procedures more affordable. Health care deserves to be a right of every human, not just the rich, and this only shows how backward we have it. The rich should not be the only ones with access to the health and wellness.