Frau Flip-Flop

How Angela Merkel went from pro-nukes to no-nukes.

BY PAUL HOCKENOS | JUNE 1, 2011

Germany's decision this week to turn its back on nuclear power by 2022 and embrace a future fueled by renewable energy may have been historic, but it was hardly the product of a political visionary. German Chancellor Angela Merkel arrived at this achievement almost despite herself, and only by means of a conspicuous and careening political U-turn. Although the new nuclear policy is a real cause for celebration for Germans, Merkel, try as she might, can't plausibly bask in the limelight: In the words of German newsmagazine Der Spiegel, "It's as if the pope were suddenly advocating the use of birth control pills."

In keeping with the rest of her tenure as chancellor of Germany, Merkel's scrapping of nuclear energy has been stumbling and reactive, not confident and bold. In Europe, Germany's goodbye to the atom -- as the world's fourth-largest industrial nation -- is being compared in its political magnitude to reunification at the end of the Cold War. But while Helmut Kohl's deliberate diplomacy in 1990 secured him a place in history -- and two more terms in office -- Merkel is suffering miserably at the polls and in the press.

Indeed, it's impossible for political opponents and the media to resist pointing out that her conservative coalition's new stance on nuclear energy amounts to a drastic volte-face on one of its signature electoral platforms: Merkel's latest plan directly contradicts a law passed just six months earlier, designed to extend the operating lives of Germany's nuclear energy facilities by up to 14 years.

No, it wasn't foresight or vision behind the new policies, but desperation. In the face of overwhelming public skepticism of nuclear power in the wake of Japan's Fukushima disaster, a Green Party topping Merkel's Christian Democrats in regional elections, and an anti-nuclear energy movement mobilizing hundreds of thousands in the streets, Merkel believed she had no other choice. The real kudos go to Germany's tenacious anti-nuclear opponents, who over four decades never wavered from their insistence that nuclear power had no future in Germany. Unsurprisingly, the environmentalists who are cautiously sizing up the newly accelerated phase-out aren't tempted to give Merkel a smidgen of credit for something she and her conservative party long resisted.

Merkel latest policy shift has thus put her government in a quandary, sacrificing the wishes of her coalition's conservative base -- and, critically, the powerful nuclear energy lobby in southern Germany -- without plausibly picking up any new voters from elsewhere on the political spectrum. Were national elections held today, her conservative-liberal alliance would be trounced, and rightfully so. A share of the blame certainly goes to the Christian Democrats' junior partner, the Free Democrats, whose missteps and unhappy figure in the foreign ministry, Guido Westerwelle, have contributed to the free fall of the coalition's popularity. But Merkel's flimsy leadership and singular lack of vision are the real grounds for the crisis. It has become impossible to decipher what Merkel really believes in, a puzzle reflected in her administration's meager record.

It seems an eternity ago that Merkel won Germans' hearts and votes. Kohl took her under his wing in the 1990s, but it was Merkel, and Merkel alone, who made the most of her opportunity in a Catholic, male-dominated, thoroughly West German party that direly needed modernizing. Merkel stood out in every way: an East German, female, Protestant, professional, twice-married, childless physicist. In contrast with Germany's traditional alpha-male politicos, her unglamorous style, straight talk, and down-to-earth manner were a welcome relief. Her unique biography and outsider status made her the perfect person to sweep aside cobwebbed thinking and challenge the interests that were blocking reform in her party and the republic at large.

Michael Kappeler/DPA

 SUBJECTS: GERMANY, EUROPE
 

STEVE_M

9:40 PM ET

June 1, 2011

Attack of the Bad Haiku Comment

New information
Had changed Merkel's equation
We expect stasis?

This is yet another flip-flop story. Now I'm not in any political circle, but why do we lambast public officials for switching stances? Outside of politics, this is usually from a personal evolution in thinking. Is it because these public officials don't explain why their stance has changed? Or is it because most people at the top are truly sold out to politically position themselves and have little vision other than sitting in a fancy chair?

 

PECHORIN

3:53 AM ET

June 2, 2011

EUSSR

The EU is Germany's enemy so long as it remains a currency union. The euro is only viable if states like Germany are willing to make massive, consistent, long term transfer payments to economically inefficient states throughout southern Europe. This is not realistic. Americans can overlook the fact that federal spending often goes disproportionately to economically backward regions. Despite substantial regional variations, Americans share a culture, a language, and a history-- and still these kinds of transfer payments are controversial. None of those things are true in Europe, and failing to recognize this will only end badly.

 

NAVIOWNE

4:49 AM ET

June 2, 2011

About old Germans

Germans had occupied my country - Lithuania. Now I don't like them at all. I understand that is a history, and I shouldn't think about it, but I can't. However I'm going to spend a holiday in Germany this summer :)
ab exercises for men

 

GHOSTCOMMANDER

12:06 PM ET

June 2, 2011

Angela Merkel

To me, Angela Merkel is an intelligent, knowledgeable, and ethical leader that does not ignore the facts. she is aware of the Chernobyl and Fukishima disaster as well as America's "Three Mile Island" nuclear incident.
Would the leader of any country want to have the same thing happen in their country?
What would happen if the same incident type happen in San Onofre, CA and Diablo Canyon, CA where there are nuclear power plants on earthquake fault lines? Would the costs of such a disaster be neglible?

America needs an Angela Merkel equivalent!

 

DR. SARDONICUS

8:12 PM ET

June 2, 2011

Of two minds versus dinosaur stampede against

Two points that would be funny if they were not so disturbing:

1) The USA has been practicing massive economic transfers for decades: from blue states to economically backwards red states, from blue and red states to advanced foreign economies, and from both into dead-end wars and toxic investments of corporate welfare. To the point of ruining its blue economic powerhouses through uninterrupted class warfare. Can I hear anyone in power in the U.S. say, “I’m sorry”? Anyone? On his way to the bank?

2) It’s funny to hear how wishy-washy German politicians may or may not be about instituting drastic Green reforms, when U.S. politicians are such brain-dead dinosaurs (one and all) when it comes to anything but knee-jerk blockage of anything remotely resembling those policies. People represented by no-one but inexcusable flat-earthers for profit, should not throw stones at a country whose representatives are of two minds for the same reason.

 

MUTT3003

12:36 PM ET

June 3, 2011

Half sounds familiar

The first half of this article, if the names were changed, could most easily have been about Obama. Someone who, in all likelihood, should never have been elected. And I voted for him!
Even though the big German banks are the European equivalent to Goldman Sachs (money whoring dirtbags), if I had to choose another country to live in, it would be Germany.

 

HSCHMIDT

9:26 AM ET

June 4, 2011

Missing leadership

I live in Germany. Mrs Merkel is a person without any leadership qualities at all. Her strategy–in Germany they use the verb "merkeln"–is to just wait until it is clear who wins an argument and then to punch the table with the fist and scream 'RIGHT! THAT'S WHAT I'VE ALWAYS TOLD YOU! I DECIDE IT SO!'

That is exactly what happened to her position on nuclear energy. Before Fukushima, it was opportune to follow the nuclear energy lobby, afterwards it was opportune to follow the Utopian Green ideology.

Pathetic...

 

SIMONCSAN

1:38 PM ET

June 6, 2011

Serious

All those pro-nuke people must not care about people at all. What happens if one of those reactors becomes uncontroll­able is on show in Japan.
What good does cheap energy do, if you are radioactiv­e contaminat­ed? karmaloop codes So in the end I think they care more about the citizens.”

 

DAILYHUGHES

6:13 PM ET

June 20, 2011

Flip-Flop is so over.

I remember when flip-flop first became a major buzzword in politics. Bush used it ad nauseum to describe John Kerry, and what used to be known as "intelligently changing your mind when new information arises" became known as flip-flopping. It is so utterly ridiculous.

In the case of nuclear power the choice is obvious following what happening in Japan. Why not invest our time effort and money into energies that will save our environment, be produced on a mass enough scale to keep costs down, and give incentives so pro-nuclear change their direction. Accidents have and will continue to happen and nobodies life is worth the damage it can do to our Earth. A chiropractor friend of mine recommended a documentary done in Finland about the debate on what should be done with a nuclear waste facility they were building. It was meant to last 100,000 years and it is going to take 100 years to finish. It was one of best discussions I have heard in an extremely long time where all the smartest people in the room agreed with eachother. There was no propaganda, it was pure science, understanding, and taking the long term approach for the safety of their country and our entire planet. Extremely refreshing.

Go Green Power.

 

BART KUREK

3:57 PM ET

June 29, 2011

The euro is only viable if

The euro is only viable if states like Germany are willing to make massive, consistent, long term transfer payments to economically inefficient states throughout southern Europe. This is not realistic. Americans can overlook the fact that sázkové kanceláre federal spending often goes disproportionately to economically backward regions. Despite substantial regional variations, Americans share a culture, a language, and a history-- and still these kinds of transfer payments are controversial. Would the leader of any country want to have the same thing happen in their country?What would happen if the same incident type happen in San Onofre, CA and Diablo Canyon, CA where there are nuclear power plants on earthquake fault lines?

 

LEATHAHARK

2:09 PM ET

July 1, 2011

Frau Flip-Flop

How Angela Merkel went from pro-nukes to no-nukes. All those pro-nuke people must not care about people at all. What happens if one of those reactors becomes uncontroll­able is on show in Japan. What good does cheap energy do, if you are radioactiv­e contaminat­ed? karmaloop codes So in the end I think they care more about the citizens.” read more Germans had occupied my country - Lithuania. Now I don't like them at all. I understand that is a history, and I shouldn't think about it, but I can't. However I'm going to spend a holiday in Germany this summer :) ab exercises for men