Giving Away the Farm

The Obama administration is freely giving Russia sensitive information about missile defense that weakens U.S. national security.

BY R. JAMES WOOLSEY, REBECCAH HEINRICHS | JUNE 7, 2011

President Barack Obama's administration recently threatened to veto the defense budget, citing "serious concerns" over provisions that limit the U.S. missile defense know-how that the White House is permitted to share with Moscow. This is the sort of information that Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, in his earlier days, would have assigned his spies to steal. Through its single-minded pursuit of "resetting" relations with Russia, the Obama administration may simply be willing to hand over this information and, in doing so, weaken U.S. national security.

Only two days after issuing the veto threat -- and as Obama tried to warm Russian President Dmitry Medvedev to U.S. missile defense plans at the G-8 Summit in Deauville, France -- the House of Representatives passed the defense bill. It included the provision that the president's team finds so offensive: Section 1228 requires that no funds can be used to provide the Russian Federation with sensitive U.S. missile defense technology.

This act of congressional prudence did not come out of nowhere. The Senate debate over New START raised questions about what the Obama administration may have promised Moscow regarding U.S. missile defense plans. The debate stemmed from the treaty's preamble, which linked offensive and defensive weapons, and a Russian unilateral statement that stated ratification of the treaty was conditional on whether the United States made improvements to its missile defense systems. In a treaty about reducing offensive weapons, it was clear the Russians required the Obama administration to include U.S. defenses in the bargain.

With that issue still unresolved, Congress discovered that the administration has been working on a missile defense agreement with the Russians and that Moscow had requested that the United States share with it loads of sensitive U.S. missile defense technology and operational authority as part of that deal. In the administration's eagerness to please the Kremlin, it may just oblige.

The House of Representatives has given a firm "no" to that prospect through its decision to ignore Obama's veto threat and approve the defense appropriations bill by a veto-proof vote of 322 to 96. The Senate may act similarly. On April 14, 39 Republican senators sent a letter to the president expressing their concern over the administration's consideration of granting to the Russians sensitive U.S. technology and "red button" authority to prevent the interception of incoming missiles headed for U.S. troops or allies. This would allow Russia to deny the United States the ability to intercept a missile Washington had determined to be a threat.

The letter, spearheaded by Sen. Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), requested the administration provide the Senate with assurances that it will not share sensitive information with Moscow. The senators cited the problem that sharing this information with Russia poses in light of its history of espionage and technological cooperation with Iran and Syria.

Jeff J Mitchell/Getty Images

 

R. James Woolsey is chairman of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and a former director of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. Rebeccah Heinrichs is an adjunct fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies and a former manager of the Congressional Missile Defense Caucus.

CONST56

9:22 AM ET

June 8, 2011

An utter failure

Destroying our economic system, alienating allies, surrendering our own defense. I once thought Jimmy Carter was our worst president. Obama has exceeded Carter's ineptitude.

Do the right thing America, vote this man out of office in 2012.

 

AARKY

8:05 PM ET

June 8, 2011

Are We really giving away Secrets?

Maybe I missed it , but I'm amazed these propagandists didn't bring up the issue of the Boeing engineers giving the Chinese technical information that helped their ballistic missiles fly straight. Clinton was promptly blamed, but Boeing was fined millions for the inadvertant release of the highly technical information.
Does no one remember that Woolsey is a prostitute who will sell himself to the highest bidder. Does no one remember that Woolsey was one of the men who was helping spread all the lies that got us into Iraq, all the while receiving hundreds of thousands from Ahmed Chalabi. This fraudster had received over $30 million from the CIA, until they realized he was a con artist. If you read enough of this "Sky is Falling" story, the fingers of the Israelis start to appear. Senator Kirk points out that if we give the Russians our missile technology, they will automatically give it to Syria and Iran. We should point out that the Russians didn't provide their S-300 anti Aircraft systems to Iran even though it was paid for and they are strictly defensive in nature. The idea that we are endangering our national defense by talking to the Russians is ludicrous, since most of their systems make ours look poor by comparison. This article is too typical of some that appear on FP, propaganda on behalf of Israel.

 

MORTIMUS

7:14 AM ET

June 9, 2011

woolsley, you cock!

you numbnuts, it's not the missile defense systems that keep russia or iran or whoever from attacking; its the thought of a retaliatory strike that concerns them.

When it comes to missile systems, offense is the best defense.

Scrap the useless AEGIS, THAADS, GMDs and all the other useless bullshit defense systems and just focus on our own delivery systems. Make them as badass as possible so the russkies don't even contemplate getting away with a first strike.

Unless you are lobbying for the manufacturers of bullshit weapons and weapons defense systems, you sound like a complete douche-taint.

 

MORTIMUS

7:33 AM ET

June 9, 2011

As to rebbecah heinrichs...

If you weren't so dadgum adorable, i would not have allowed you to escape my wrath.

Indeed; I am a kind and magnanimous beyond comprehension.

 

MORTIMUS

2:45 AM ET

June 10, 2011

oh come on...

It's obvi she's a brunette, albeit one with very understated, very classy blonde highlights. And they look ffffabulous!

As to the article in question, it was written in 2009. I'll go ahead and attribute it to well-intentioned, if youthful folly. I mean she was probably what, like nineteen when she wrote it?

 

MORTIMUS

5:01 AM ET

June 10, 2011

you're a man after my own heart, benny...

Yes, we can bring in John Paul DeJoria to testify. But seriously, although I could talk all day about women's hair fashion, it might be a bit tangential to the issue of missile defense and protecting american lives.

Actually, now that i think about it, missile defense is a bit tangential to the task of protecting american lives. I'm not worrying so much about a state actor launching ICBMs as I am of non-state, non-classical actors launching rocket-propelled artillery at american troops. It's rockets that kill people, not missiles.

I'm less worried about state-of-the-art ss-18 satans or ss-27 sickles than I am about the unguided flying tuna cans that have been killing our boys in iraq (and giving the israelis fits)-- you got your qassams, katyushas, al-quds, or the iranian zelzal, fajr, or khaibar. Those rocket-propelled barbecue pits have killed more people than a any missile ever has.

Alas, rockets just aren't that sexy of cause for all the defense industry think-wankers out there; so much more money in intercontinental missiles, i'm afraid. And it really doesn't make sense using a 5-10 million dollar interceptor on an exploding coffee filled with TNT that can be built for $1,000 bucks.

 

MORTIMUS

10:50 AM ET

June 10, 2011

see what i mean?

this little angel got had her 1 year old and 3 year old sister and brother killed, and one of her legs torn off by a 122mm grad rocket; it wasn't a missile with state of the art avionics that destroyed her life oh noooooooo....it was a goddamn flying crockpot full of HE...

http://www.cnn.com/2011/WORLD/africa/06/10/libya.misrata.child.victims/index.html?hpt=hp_c2

Makes me sick...

 

EINGRIFF

5:36 PM ET

June 10, 2011

One Each Mole, 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue

What do you expect, with a mole pretending to the Office of President?

The Congress is gravely derelict in its duty to investigate exhaustively not only Obama's constitutional eligibility but his probity, citizenship or citizenships, and allegiance, which has probably been to the Comintern for most if not all of his adult life.

Hello, CIA? Obama's DNA would disprove his latest proffered "birth certificate" published by the White House 27 April 2011; it is biologically impossible for him to be the son of a Negro father and a Caucasian mother.

Does not the United States have a DNA sample or authentic genetic analysis of Obama? Is the CIA in on the gag?

 

GENNY

2:57 PM ET

June 11, 2011

how d'you vote, dears, how do you vote?!

there are no miracles in this valley of sorrow. when you weaken your fence you create more opportunities to the thiefs, no more no less. OR another option: you create big problems in the future for whom will live in your home after you