Straight Guy in Scotland

What the "Gay Girl in Damascus" hoax tells us about ourselves and the media in the era of the Arab Spring.

BY DAVID KENNER | JUNE 13, 2011

We're naive about the perils of anonymity.

It has to be said: The life of Amina Arraf was a good story. On a website called "Gay Girl in Damascus," this purportedly Syrian-American lesbian blogger wrestled with issues surrounding her national identity, her sexuality, her faith, and the future of her country at a time of open revolt. At a time when most of the information coming out of Syria comes in the form of choppy, graphic YouTube videos or breathless tweets about the Assad regime's crackdowns, here was a young woman writing from Damascus in flawless English about her country's social and political turmoil.

And then it all fell apart. Following a post on Amina's blog by her "cousin" reporting that she had been arrested and that her whereabouts were unknown, journalists and readers sprung into action, emailing one another and looking for friends and contacts who might know where she had been taken. Oddly, there were no real leads. None of the many people who had befriended her online had ever met her in person, pictures allegedly of Amina turned out to be a Croatian woman living in Britain, and an old blog written by the same person was self-described as a blend of fact and fiction -- "and I will not tell you which is which."

On June 12, Amina finally came out -- as Tom MacMaster, a 40-year-old American man who is currently pursuing a master's degree at the University of Edinburgh in Scotland. In an initial apology post that included a hint of defiance, MacMaster admitted that Amina was fictional, but that "the facts on this blog are true and not misleading" about the events in Syria. Finally, facing international opproprium, in a more contrite June 13 post, MacMaster donned sackloth, writing, "I feel like I am in some ways the worst person in the world."

This conceit gives MacMaster too much credit. It does not take an evil genius to launch a fictional blog. MacMaster is certainly a fool (and one hopes there's no Jayson Blair-esque book deal in the offing), but the more important question is why this particular fool was able to mislead so much of the Western media, and the public it serves. Part of the reason is that media standards have yet to catch up with the realities (and temptations) of instant online publishing: Tools like e-mail, Twitter, blogs, and Facebook may represent a digital revolution, but they also can conceal an author's identity -- and, in this case, a lie that would have easily been exposed with a quick phone call.

But MacMaster's hoax has implications that go beyond the damaged credibility of the New York Times and CNN, two of the many media outlets that reported on Amina over the past several months. The story played perfectly into Syrian President Bashar al-Assad's effort to portray the domestic revolt as one guided by shadowy outsiders -- indeed, Syria's official government mouthpiece prominently featured a profile of MacMaster, claiming that the hoax "aimed at enhancing continuous fabrications and lies against Syria in term of (sic) kidnapping bloggers and activists."


We're too eager to believe liberal interpretations of the Middle East.

Amina's great appeal was her ability to transcend religious, ethnic, and political lines. "I am complex, I am many things; I am an Arab, I am Syrian, I am a woman, I am queer," she wrote, in a post that paid homage to both famed Palestinian poet Mahmoud Darwish and American founding father Patrick Henry.

She also hated the Assad regime with a passion and offered a comforting version of post-revolutionary Syria. "The New Syria will be a better place for Kurds. It will be a better place for Muslims. It will even be a better place for Communists," she wrote. "And one thing is becoming clear; we're done with dictators and rule by strong men.… We've learned to respect one another even when we disagree."

It is a pretty thought, and perhaps there's a chance that for a segment of the population it's true. But it is also a message that Western audiences undoubtedly wanted to hear.

We like a good yarn.

The neat, linear narrative of Amina's story made it very attractive to casual readers -- not unlike fiction, funny enough -- but not quite in the way that real life often plays out.

On April 26, four days after Syrian security forces massacred at least 72 protesters in what was then the bloodiest day of the revolt, Amina broke through in the Western press in a big way. In a post titled "My father, the hero," she described a late-night visit by pro-regime enforcers intent on arresting her because of the contents of her blog. The regime thugs insult and grope Amina before being chased off by her father, who delivers an impassioned plea against religious extremism and for coexistence between the Sunni and Alawite sects.

It was all too convenient. As stability in Syria deteriorated, Amina's posts oscillated between erotic poetry and a visit to a Damascus mosque, disguised in full hijab, to meet fellow revolutionaries. Following another spasm of violence in Syria, Amina's "cousin" posted on June 6 that three men had grabbed her off the street and wrestled her into a car, and that her whereabouts were unknown.

We're suckers for a pretty face.

"I knew what she looked like in my head and I grabbed photos of a woman whom I have never met who looked exactly like what Amina should look like," MacMaster wrote in his second apology, describing how he created this character.

It just so happened that Amina's alter ego was Jelena Lucic -- a fetching, pale-skinned Croatian woman working at the Royal College in London. The images, which had been lifted from Lucic's Facebook page, helped to spur a digital romance with a Canada-based lesbian blogger that extended to over 500 emails, and still adorn Facebook groups calling for the fictional girl's release.

After the hoax became public, observers raced to point out that choice of a pretty, unveiled woman as "author"  garnered the "Gay Girl in Damascus" attention that would have been denied to other Arabs. "Tom MacMaster's ‘Freedom' is not a group of brown women shouting in solidarity with signs and heads covered, demanding that Syria is their country," wrote one incensed blogger. "Freedom is a single white face, a delicate femininity performing innocent submission for the camera, an ‘out' blogger who appears to have no community to be out to, a Syrian who is really an American, and the ‘ultimate outsider' who ends the story when she escapes from the Middle East, presumably, to return to the USA."


We missed obvious details.

With the benefit of hindsight, it's hard to see how the hoax survived as long as it did. Amina supposedly hailed from a prominent Sunni family in Damascus -- very powerful, apparently. In a May 3 post, our protagonist described getting drunk with her father, who revealed that she was "on the list" of potential wives for President Bashar al-Assad. The father, increasingly intoxicated, later begins to dial Bashar's cell phone number to denounce the regime before Amina stops him.

It doesn't take an expert in Syrian politics to understand why it is far-fetched that a woman as well-known as Amina claimed to be would denounce the regime so boldly, and so openly compromise her family's position. The prospect of a Syrian-American woman from one of the country's leading families openly criticizing Assad -- and remaining free for months -- would have been unthinkable when Syria was stable, let alone during the current crackdown.

And then there are the smaller details. Amina never referenced specific locations or events in Damascus. On the rare occasions that she reached for Arabic words, she wrote them in Latin characters rather than Arabic script. Again, that's our ignorance: the overwhelming majority of her readership was unable to distinguish between a graduate student with a passing knowledge of Arab politics and language and a true native.

In late May, in a passage that likely hints at MacMaster's own reasons for dwelling on this character, Amina described why she returned to Syria from the United States. "I had vague plans to finally finish the autobiographical novel that I've been steadily working on, maybe to finish a few of the science fiction and fantasy stories I had plotted," she wrote. "I'd reconnect myself to my roots and the price seemed low."

But as the Syrian bloggers who must now work doubly hard to prove the veracity of their work can attest, it was not as low as hoped.

 

David Kenner is an associate editor at Foreign Policy.

THOMASOROURKE

7:55 AM ET

June 14, 2011

Blind Stupidity.

As unbelievably selfish as this farcical situation was, maybe it just might teach Western media a lesson in the sanctity of free speech. If you have nothing worth saying -- don't say it! Surely the journalists at 'credible' organizations such as the New York Times and CNN should source their news materials from credible sources -- or is this asking too much? I expect better.
- Tom.

 

F1FAN

8:12 AM ET

June 14, 2011

I can't believe anyone was fooled

For weeks on whatreallyhappened.com Mike Rivero was posting links to stories about this being a sham. It's just laziness in the media and in the people consuming it. Broaden your resources, you'd be surprised how often 'fringe crackpots' are right.

 

RMDUENAS

9:09 AM ET

June 14, 2011

Trust but verify

I hope he feels the worst person in the world for quite some time. He not only fooled thousands, he stole the picture of another person to make up his farce. If he and the Croatian woman resided in the US, he would probably be facing a lawsuit. Yes, shame on all those who fell for the story, particularly the media but, above all, shame on him. The damage he causes goes far beyond of what he is capable of imagining.

 

XTIANGODLOKI

10:31 AM ET

June 14, 2011

The media thought they could make money off this "news"

And it did, for a while.

When it comes to controversial topics involving foreign nations most media news items are just propaganda anyway.

 

FRIEDCO

11:04 AM ET

June 14, 2011

How Dare He????

How dare MacMaster fabricate facts and make up outlandish stories!!!!

Who does he think he is -- a spokesman for the Syrian government. ..Hamas...Fatah...Hezballah?

He's an amateur among professionals.

 

THOMANMD

1:25 PM ET

June 14, 2011

Just goes to show how easy it

Just goes to show how easy it is to get duped today with twitter, Facebook, blogs and the need for instant gratification here and now. Still I can't believe how long MacMaster was able to keep the sham up.

 

EMILIAFOXTON

4:25 PM ET

June 14, 2011

Just goes to show....

I agree with you THOMANMD. For this degree of deception MacMaster must have an element of a split personality. The advent of Facebook, Twitter et al have allowed so many of these sham identities and even the most sophisticated can be taken in.

 

MORTIMUS

3:03 PM ET

June 14, 2011

Mr. MacMaster...

Great job, Tom. Your foolish actions have provided the Syrian regime with the kind of propaganda victory that will serve to bolster the state and will undoubtedly lead to the deaths of the very same Syrians you claim to advocate for.

You jagbag.

 

MORTIMUS

3:33 PM ET

June 14, 2011

hot off the presses...

So now it turns out that the blogger who was vouching for this blogger was also a man masquerading as a woman.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2011/jun/14/second-lesbian-blogger-exposed-paula-brooks

This is f*cking brilliant right here:

"I didn't start this with my name because … I thought people wouldn't take it seriously, me being a straight man," he said. He said his interaction with Amina was purely coincidental, "a major sock-puppet hoax crash[ing] into a major sock-puppet hoax." "Sock puppet" is the term used by bloggers to describe a fake persona adopted by a blogger who may also be posting under another name.

Amina often "flirted" with Brooks, the paper said – with neither man apparently realising that the other was also a man pretending to be a lesbian."

WHAT'S NEXT?!?

Is Andrew Exum actually an adolescent girl from Korea masquerading as a security expert?!?

Is Andrew Sullivan actually a straight man masquerading as gay neocon hawk?!?

Is Michelle Malkin actually an anchor-baby from the Phillipines masquerading as a conservative blogger?!?

Is Megan McArdle actually a middle-aged man wearing a wig?!?

Well, that last one would actually make a little bit of sense...

 

BILLSMITH

4:35 PM ET

June 14, 2011

It is how it is

The death toll in Syria is over 1000 but such numbers are meaningless in our society - men are dead, it evokes no passion.

But a gay girl - wow that was a real human, being negatively impacted by the war.

He played on our prejudices as a society. I'm glad we would care about the life of a gay, half-american woman in Damascus, had she been real. But, in addition to that - lets care about the men that die every day karmaloop codes. They don't need to die, and if nothing else, think of them this way - they could be the brother or father of a gay lesbian - so they have importance too.

 

LITTLEMANTATE

5:23 PM ET

June 14, 2011

Good summary, only missing one addition

sympathetic victims' stories tend to be widely distributed in semi-official and mainstream news outlets and are championed by politicians when those victims come from states that we feel comfortable hating. There seems to be two types of US advocacy at work here. There is the public advocacy which appears to be private persons, interest groups and individual journalists who find the story compelling. Simultaneously, and feeding off of it, is the more cynical manipulation of the situation by politicians.

One is reminded of the story of the Iranian girl Neda Agha-Sultan, whose story was true, but who was also used. So many American politicians and pro-war commentators knew Neda on a first name basis, it seemed. I was always curious as to why these admirers of Neda thought to honor her memory by exposing her loved ones to an Iraq style invasion.

 

STEVELAUDIG

5:43 PM ET

June 14, 2011

He is evidence not crime.

Evidence of what many pretty much already knew. That the "bigs" in the media have feet of clay and reminds me of what I think is a W.C. Fields observation: "You can't con an honest man." If it sounds too good to be true it probably is and those calling themselves journalists at the bigs should probably step away from the keyboard and telephone once in a while. He did us a favor by providing evidence that the 'bigs' are not to be trusted.

 

STEVELAUDIG

5:43 PM ET

June 14, 2011

He is evidence not crime.

Evidence of what many pretty much already knew. That the "bigs" in the media have feet of clay and reminds me of what I think is a W.C. Fields observation: "You can't con an honest man." If it sounds too good to be true it probably is and those calling themselves journalists at the bigs should probably step away from the keyboard and telephone once in a while. He did us a favor by providing evidence that the 'bigs' are not to be trusted.

 

SOFTENG

5:53 AM ET

July 13, 2011

About the issue of

About the issue of authenticity - if someone is knowledgeable about a topic but in order to gain a wider audience that person adopts a persona does that completely undermine their viewpoint (for example Equiano or John Howard Griffin) cloggedarteries?But a gay girl - wow that was a real human, being negatively impacted by the war.