Fortress India

Why is Delhi building a new Berlin Wall to keep out its Bangladeshi neighbors?

BY SCOTT CARNEY, JASON MIKLIAN, KRISTIAN HOELSCHER | JULY/AUGUST 2011

Felani wore her gold bridal jewelry as she crouched out of sight inside the squalid concrete building. The 15-year-old's father, Nurul Islam, peeked cautiously out the window and scanned the steel and barbed-wire fence that demarcates the border between India and Bangladesh. The fence was the last obstacle to Felani's wedding, arranged for a week later in her family's ancestral village just across the border in Bangladesh.


The World's Most Dangerous Borders
Thirteen Places You Don't Want to Be Stuck at.

There was no question of crossing legally -- visas and passports from New Delhi could take years -- and besides, the Bangladeshi village where Islam grew up was less than a mile away from the bus stand on the Indian side. Still, they knew it was dangerous. The Indians who watched the fence had a reputation for shooting first and asking questions later. Islam had paid $65 to a broker who said he could bribe the Indian border guard, but he had no way of knowing whether the money actually made it into the right hands.

Father and daughter waited for the moment when the guards' backs were turned and they could prop a ladder against the fence and clamber over. The broker held them back for hours, insisting it wasn't safe yet. But eventually the first rays of dawn began to cut through the thick morning fog. They had no choice but to make a break for it.

Islam went first, clearing the barrier in seconds. Felani wasn't so lucky. The hem of her salwar kameez caught on the barbed wire. She panicked, and screamed. An Indian soldier came running and fired a single shot at point-blank range, killing her instantly. The father fled, leaving his daughter's corpse tangled in the barbed wire. It hung there for another five hours before the border guards were able to negotiate a way to take her down; the Indians transferred the body across the border the next day. "When we got her body back the soldiers had even stolen her bridal jewelry," Islam told us, speaking in a distant voice a week after the January incident.

Other border fortifications around the world may get all the headlines, but over the past decade the 1,790-mile fence barricading the near entirety of the frontier between India and Bangladesh has become one of the world's bloodiest. Since 2000, Indian troops have shot and killed nearly 1,000 people like Felani there.

In India, the 25-year-old border fence -- finally expected to be completed next year at a cost of $1.2 billion -- is celebrated as a panacea for a whole range of national neuroses: Islamist terrorism, illegal immigrants stealing Indian jobs, the refugee crisis that could ensue should a climate catastrophe ravage South Asia. But for Bangladeshis, the fence has come to embody the irrational fears of a neighbor that is jealously guarding its newfound wealth even as their own country remains mired in poverty. The barrier is a physical reminder of just how much has come between two once-friendly countries with a common history and culture -- and how much blood one side is willing to shed to keep them apart.

Scott Carney

 SUBJECTS: INDIA, BORDERS, SOUTH ASIA
 

Scott Carney is author of The Red Market: On the Trail of the World's Organ Brokers, Bone Thieves, Blood Farmers, and Child Traffickers. Jason Miklian and Kristian Hoelscher are researchers at the Peace Research Institute Oslo. This article was made possible with a grant from the Fund for Investigative Journalism.

RAJSINGH

4:06 AM ET

June 20, 2011

such a bigotry and one sided article

this article is so one sided with not proper evidences and fels like a accusation ..

You compared it with US/Mexican border .. but India is not US .. we are a poor country and cannot support 20 million bangladeshi immigrants , you do know that in many states or assam and West bengal the "illegal" immigrants are now a big voting block and have become influential, You should also know that Bangladesh is not Mexico and there are many extremist organization there .. from LET to ULFA , a lot of insurgent s in India lived and trained there ( though the situation is much better now with the present bangla govt.)

you said that Bangladesh does nto respond .. do you ever follow news .. let me give you one example : http://www.rediff.com/news/2001/apr/18bang3.htm

and search more you will find dozen of such articles .. in one case 16 BSF soldiers were killed and then carried like animals by BDR.

The border fence is a necessity and don't try to drum it up as a humanitarian issue ... we are a sovereign country and have all the rights to protect our borders .. just see all the western countries adn how they protect their borders from immigrants ...

I can't believe this article is called "Reporting" , what a shame !!!

 

ISHA KHAN

2:02 AM ET

June 22, 2011

Bangla-India border

Bangladesh :ROUNDED UP

Surrounded by 3783 km of barbed wire fencing, is Bangladesh to be the world’s largest prison?

by MM ALI, ALTAF PARVEZ, SHAMSUDDOHA SHOAIB and K MAHMUD

In Assam, if you are wearing a lungi or a beard, people say you’re from Bangladesh

– TIME, February 05, 2009

The famous, or infamous, Berlin Wall used to be 140km. The wall which Israel has built around Gaza is 760km. The wall along the US-Mexico border is 1123km. But the length of the Indian barbed wire fencing along its border with Bangladesh is more than all these walls combined.

The longest border fencing in the world

While Bangladesh and India share a 4096 border which delineates the two separate countries, the people of the border regions are not always that separate. Particularly the people of West Bengal and Assam, and those this side of the border adjacent to those states, have relations or either side of the border, and in the past had thriving business relations too. In fact, the border would even pass through the middle of some houses, causing the international media to even term it as the world’s most “inhuman border”.

The logic put forward by the Indian politicians for constructing this fence is very much on the same lines as the Israel justification of wall along Palestine. India is also proceeding with the construction of a 1800km fence along its border with Pakistan. However, the construction of the fence around Bangladesh is proceeding at a much faster pace. This is now being acknowledged as the world’s longest border fence.

Concerned government, human rights activists and the affected countries are very vocal in their protest against the border wall between Israel and Palestine and the fencing between USA and Mexico. In Bangladesh, however, this issue is being totally overlooked. Only on May 15, 2010, Abdus Sobhan Sikder, Home Secretary at the time, said, “In constructing this barbed wire fencing, India has violated international laws in at least 46 places [The Daily Star May 16, 2010].” The Home Secretary pointed out that even in the joint survey with India, at least 12 points were identified where there was violation of the international compulsions not to have any structures or construction within 150 yards from the zero point of the border demarcation.

Symbol of racism

This project went into full operation from 1989. Initially 3.7 billion rupees was allocated for this project, but this amount gradually increased and is likely to stand at 10.5 billion rupees. Not only has Indian erected this barbed wire fence, but in places has also, along the fence, constructed roads for movement of heavy military vehicles. So far about 3000 km of fencing has been completed. The fence is three metres high. Several other structures are to be constructed alongside the fencing.

Using the Right to Information Act, on 30 December, 2009, local Indian citizens obligated their government to reveal detailed information about the border fencing. It was then revealed that till date a total of 5205.43 rupees had been spent and the decision had been to raise 3436.59km of barbed wire border fencing. Later Indian sources revealed that actually 3783km of fencing would be raised. According to a statement made by the then Indian Home Secretary in the Lok Sabha, in the 2004-5 financial year, already a sum of 2404.70 rupees has been spent on the fencing. In some places of Assam the barbed wire fence has even been electrified.

When the US had decided to construct a wall/fencing along its border with Mexico, at least two laws had been drawn up in two phases. Finally the Secure Fence Act 2006 was adopted for the task. This came into effect from September 13, 2006. In the case of India, no such law was adopted. It was simply by administrative decision that the plan to surround Bangladesh was taken up for execution.

The justification made by the US for its border wall was that narcotics were being smuggled in from Mexico. As for Israel, they reasoned that the wall along the West Bank was a security measure against alleged Palestinian terrorist attacks. India faced neither threat from Bangladesh. On the contrary, it is from India that Phensydyl and other narcotic substances as well as arms and ammunition enter Bangladesh, posing as a security threat to this side of the border. Despite all this, Bangladesh never demanded any kind of anti-humanitarian sort of infrastructure. Interestingly, all the issues which India has highlighted in justifying this border fencing, exist in the case of Nepal too, but it has made no move for any such wall with Nepal.

Perhaps it is because of their diplomacy and failure to fall into the trap of ethnic hatred that Bangladesh’s policymakers have maintained a strange silence about this fencing, while standing fully in favour of handing over transit or corridor facilities to India. Yet this construction of the fence and road around the border is even a violation of the Mujib-Indira treaty signed in 1974. Even though this treaty expired in 1997, it is still considered to be the guiding force behind Bangladesh- India relations.

According to the Mujib-Indira treaty, neither of the country could construct any infrastructure that would be harmful to the other country. In constructing this border fencing, India has completely moved away from the treaty. Along various parts of its border, India is using ground sensor technology imported from Israel. In a recent issue of the Kolkata daily Bartaman (June 5, 2011), Ashok Kumar, Acting DG of BSF’s Cooch Bihar sector, is quoted to have said that they are using such sophisticated thermal imagers that even in the night they can observe activities a few kilometers within Bangladesh. Previously, on October 15, 2006, Zee News sources revealed that just for the Bangladesh border alone, India had procured 900 hand-held imagers, each set costing 28 lac rupees. The equipment uses its body heat to detect its object. Additionally, BSF has procured for the border Israel-made LORROS (Long-Range Recce and Observation System) which enables them to carry out intensive observation for 40 miles along the border. They have procured at least 27 sets of such radar-based technology, each set costing two crore rupees.

It is not in technology alone, but in its entire border management that India has forgotten the spirit of the Mujib-Indira Treaty. The very first paragraph speaks of long-term peace and friendship, peaceful co-existence, and not having any discriminatory attitudes towards one another. But having a thousands of miles long barbed wire fence surrounding Bangladesh hardly speaks of friendship. On the contrary to speaks of a sort of ethnic hatred. The US has a similar attitude towards Mexico.

Threat to biodiversity

All the elements for which the human rights activists of the world opposed the Israel-Palestine and the US-Mexico border walls/fencing, exist in the case of India and Bangladesh too. The ethnic groups living along the US-Mexican border are being cut off from each other’s kith and kin because of the border wall. The fencing between Bangladesh and India has similar broken up thousands of families. Since time immemorial people on either side of the border have become related to each other through marriage. They could never imagine a wall separating people of the same language and ethnicity. These families are now split. This has also hit them hard economically.

This longest border fencing in the world is also going to divide the world largest mangrove forest, the Sundarbans. This has created concern among environmentalists at an international level. Roads and other infrastructure will have to be constructed in the Sundarbans too for them to set up this wire fencing. The wire fencing and the roads will certainly harm Sundarbans’ biodiversity. Tigers and other animals on the verge of extinction will lose their natural habitat. Biodiversity will vanish in no time if the fencing is electrified.

A military mindset

Needless to say, the source of such a short-sighted anti-humanitarian project is the military and bureaucratic mindset. It is noted that the three countries constructing these controversial border divides have strong military mindsets and also share links of cooperation among each other. Most of the agreements of cooperation among these countries are of the military ilk. The right wing media aids and assists in placing public opinion in the military mould. It is the smaller neighbours like Bangladesh who have to bear the brunt of such attitudes. And yet for the “security” which India is apparently seeking through its barbed wire fencing, the best alternative would be for it to grow strong ties of friendship and trust with Bangladesh.

http://www.probenewsmagazine.com/index.php?index=2&contentId=7220

 

RAJSINGH

5:27 AM ET

June 22, 2011

crap !!

a sovereign country wants to protect its borders .. the fence is in the Indian side of the border then how is it a racist issue ... come over to murshidabad , kolkata or other districts in bengal and u will see how many illegal Bangladeshi immigrants are living there !!

I did not say anything against bangladeshis. I have nothing against them and my mother tongue is Bengali , I jsut said the report was one sided ... and it is !!!

 

SHAMSUZZOHA

12:24 AM ET

June 29, 2011

Come to Bangladesh

Dear
Please come to Bangladesh and see how many Indians are working illegally in our hospitals as nurses, as engineers in garments sectors, and in involved inmany more business illegally. If Felani could be killed, she could be arrested, too and taken into custody for legal action.
Your country has more number of terrorist groups active than any other country in Sub continent, or may be only second to Pakistan.Our Shantibahini got arms from your country, specially during the rule of Rajiv Gandhi. In 2005 one terrorist group of Bangladesh named Jamaatul Mujahedin carried out severe attacks on people serving in judiciary in Bangladesh, and from where they got explosives, you know ? Indian minefields.
The BNp led government took severe actions against ULFA in Sylhet and Chittagong region, led by Late Shahid Col Gulzar Uddin Ahmed, killed in the mutiny of one our para military force.
The earlier govt was successful in stoppoing 10 truck arms smuggling to your country. Present government has continued the investigation and even some high ranking Army Officers are arrested and the investigation is on.
Will your country ever have any such guts to take action against your RAW officers who were involved in supplying arms to Shantibahini ?
Let us be friends...the two neighbouring and prospectus country...the civil society of India must try to value our friendship.
rgds

 

RMS

12:38 AM ET

July 9, 2011

Indian Atrocities

Many Bangladeshi's (count me in this category) have little or no objection to BSF guards shooting people attempting to cross the border illegally; break the law and live with the consequences is my motto. FP and many posters ignore the primary objections of Bangladeshi's:
1. BSF guards murdering Bangladeshi citizens on the Bangladeshi side of the border.
2. BSF guard encroaching into Bangladeshi territory and kidnapping, murdering, torturing Bangladeshi citizens.
3. BSG guards firing indiscriminately on BDR guards.

India is despised by Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladeshi, and now Nepal. I suggest Indians reflect on this unfortunate situation.

 

MAZO

4:51 AM ET

June 20, 2011

Mountain meet Molehill....

"Since 2000, Indian troops have shot and killed nearly 1,000 people like Felani there."

This one statement alone demonstrates the sheer bias of this article. Felani and civilians like her have been a small minority of cases who have been killed. Most of the people killed by the Border Security Force on the Indian side have been cattle smugglers, fuel smugglers drug smugglers, human traffickers and gun runners. All engaging in highly illegal activities and activities that cause the greatest harm to the very poorest of the poor, especially in Bangladesh.

Why doesn't this article note how human trafficking of young Bangladeshi girls sold into prostitution in India has been dramatically curtailed due to the Border fence ? How the sale of low quality drugs and the sale of illegal weapons has been curtailed ?

"and how much blood one side is willing to shed to keep them apart."

This statement again belies the real truth of the situation. The Bangladeshi Rifles are notorious for sparking international incidents by firing at Indian Border Police without cause. Till the recent change in government in Dhaka, the Bangla Rifles were regularly conducting unprovoked attacks on Indian guard positions along the international border. This was either done to give cover to smugglers moving goods across the border or to facilitate the crossing of criminals and terrorists from the Indian side over to Bangladesh to find safe sanctuary.

This article's hypocritical tone about "Indian aggression" fails to explain the belligerence of the Bangla Rifles or the fact that Bangladesh has stubbornly refused to demonstrate even a modicum of neighborly behavior by continuously refusing the passage of Indian goods across its territory to Indian states on its other sides or from Indian goods or Burmese oil from meeting each other. Bangladesh has for the last few decades engaged in a policy that was actively hostile towards India while covertly supporting anti-Indian militias, anti-Indian Islamic terrorists and other operations that have been severely detrimental to Indian internal security. The article fails to even note how many BSF soldiers have lost their lives to Bangla Border Guards in unprovoked firing on BSF positions. After all this, do the authors of this article really expect Indian benevolence towards such neighbors ?

The bottom line is quite simply; India owes Bangladesh NOTHING. We do not owe Bangladeshis refuge from natural disasters or economic aid or democratic guidance to solve their political problems and we most certainly do no owe Bangladesh a share of our still nascent economic progress.
In fact it is the Bangladeshis that owe India much for having a nation at all and for coming to their aid to stop a genocide by Pakistani troops.

 

NOMANDLANDS

5:11 PM ET

June 27, 2011

Illegal is illegal

I am not sure I understand some of the comments here. I do not care if it's India or US... illegal immigrants are "illegal", as the name implies. I like Bangladeshis, their handmade jewelry, their food, but I am not sure I'd want millions of them taking our jobs illegally.

 

RMS

12:40 AM ET

July 9, 2011

Bangladeshi's unlike

Bangladeshi's unlike Pakistani's would be India's natural allies. it is arrogant Indians such as you that create tension. Wonder why no country in SAARC likes India? This post explains it all,

 

KHICHURI

1:53 PM ET

June 20, 2011

Good article, but needs more perspective

You need to understand the reason why this is a huge issue in India. Immigration of millions from across the border have led to major demographic changes in some Indian states leading to violent movements that lasted for decades. Lets say if illegal immigrants from Mexico become close to 50% of the population of an US state - and if USA and Mexico were both very poor countries with lots of ethnic divisions and conflicts and if Mexico were majority Muslim which had a record of treating their Christian minority very badly, how would things work out? Bangladesh has for decades provided shelter to Islamic militants and other terrorist newworks that have targeted India - they have stopped doing this only recently after a new progressive government came to power. The minority community in Bangladesh- Hindus have been treated pretty horribly by Bangladesh, though things have been getting better of late.

That said, unlike the other comments, I unequivoically condemn the shooting of innocent people on the border and I agree it should stop. So you are making an useful point. Thanks.

 

SHAN94

8:47 PM ET

June 21, 2011

A complete lack of historical understanding

Bangladeshi muslims are Indian Bengali muslims who in 1946, claimed that they could not live with Hindus and used street rioting in Direct Action Day and Noakhali, to rape, murder and forcibly convert Hindus. East Pakistan / Bangladesh was carved out of India by muslim rioting.

They reduced Hindus from 30% in 1946 to 10% today, by ethnic cleansing, abduction of women, land grabbing by Enemy Property Act and other acts of terror.

Bangladeshi muslims have formed Eurabia type enclaves in many bordering states of India. And here, they harass the local Hindus by stealing women, cattle, and land.
Illegal immigrant Bangladeshi muslims have already formed islamist secessionist groups like MULTA, trying to slice off a few more districts from India.

Bangladesh gave up secularism in 1975 and Islam is the state religion.
Hindus, Christians and Buddhists from Bangladesh are welcome in India.
As far as Bangladeshi muslims, they have no further rights on India. They made their choice in 1946 and they can enjoy their karma.

Mexican illegals are christian not muslims like the Bangladeshi muslims.
Bangladeshi muslims , living in UK, have made many parts of London into Eurabia.

 

RMS

12:41 AM ET

July 9, 2011

India claims to be secular

India claims to be secular state but kills Muslims with a vehemence that Israeli's envy. Remember Modi the butcher?

 

MBI MUNSHI

11:00 PM ET

June 21, 2011

FP swallows Indian Propaganda whole

It is a shame that US magazines still remain so undiscerning and uncritical of Indian policy objectives and propaganda aimed at its South Asian neighbors. India's border fencing policy with Bangladesh has nothing to do with climate change or illegal immigration. India would be a far worse sufferer of climate change than Bangladesh with the ocean on three sides (i.e. the Indian Ocean and the Arabian Sea covering India's eastern and western flanks) and the tsunami of 2004 clearly showing that a rise in sea levels would have extremely devastating consequences for India. Bangladesh was completely unharmed by the 2004 tsunami because of the shallow waters on its coastal regions. India will sink long before Bangladesh does in the case of climate change and a corresponding sea rise. This does not mean that Bangladesh will remain unaffected by climate change as cyclones could become more violent and deadly but there is an even chance that such a storm could hit India or Myanmar without ever reaching Bangladesh shores (look at a map).

As for illegal immigration there were only two periods where Bangladeshis/East Pakistanis emigrated to India en masse - in 1947 and 1971. Most of the emigres in these two periods were Hindus and have settled nicely in Hindu majority India without any intention of retuning to Bangladesh. After 1971 illegal immigration to India from Bangladesh has been limited and the overall figure of 20 million immigrants to India is highly exaggerated. If so many Bangladeshis had tried to emigrate to India in the last 30 years then the death rate on the border (from BSF shootings) would be far far higher. It also makes no economic sense for Bangladeshis to emigrate to India. All the Indian states surrounding Bangladesh are far poorer in GDP/PPP terms excepting one - Meghalaya which has virtually no Bangladeshi immigrants. Bangladeshis would also not prefer to go to other parts of India because of cultural, religions and linguistic differences as well as increasing Hindu chauvinism in financially lucrative and wealthy states such as Maharashtra and Gujarat. So in conclusion the argument about illegal immigration to Bangladesh is a fallacious one.

So what is the real reason for India's inhuman border fencing policy with Bangladesh? The obvious rationale for the policy (apart from India's inherent hegemonic tendencies) is preparation for war with China. Under the subservient regime of the present Awami League government under Sheikh Hasina there have been several strategically significant deals already signed or under negotiation with New Delhi such as transit facilities and access to ports as well as other vital infrastructure. These are all intended to help supply the Indian military located in the North East who are presently in a face off with Chinese troops (across the border from disputed Arunachal Pradesh) in Tibet. In the event of war, India could easily access Bangladesh to reach its army positioned in the North East but which is presently limited by the narrow Shilguri pass (or chicken neck) which could be easily blocked during a protracted conflict with China. Having access through Bangladesh provides a convenient alternative route to the North East region. But what has any of this to do with the border fencing policy? The fencing policy has a military objective to fence in Bangladeshis who might prefer to side with China and who could help incite rebellion in the insurgency prone North East states of India in time of war. It is in India's vital national interests to completely isolate and hermetically seal Bangladesh from the North East states. Bangladeshis generally resent Indian expansionist and hegemonic policies (see The India Doctrine (1947-2007)) and could easily find common cause with a sympathetic China. The strategic alignment of Bangladesh under the Awami League with India also has some obvious negative consequences for the country. Bangladesh would be inevitably drawn into a war it does not want and against a country it does not want to fight and has no serious differences with (i.e. China).

In a recent article in PROBE news magazine it was asserted that India was turning Bangladesh into a huge prison through its border fencing policy. It is my assertion that in the event of war India will in fact turn Bangladesh into a giant concentration camp.

 

RMS

12:43 AM ET

July 9, 2011

I have no objection

I have no objection whatsoever to India fencing their border on their side and shooting anyone trying to cross illegally. Their country, their rights.

I object to BSF guards shooting Bangladeshi's when they are in OUR country, and encroaching our territory. They should stay on their side of the border. Any Bangladeshi who goes to India should expect to be tortured and stop complaining about it. But we have a right to be secure on our side of the border.

 

AHOM47

5:13 PM ET

July 11, 2011

RMS

I do not care about how many Bangladeshi go to West Bengal. You guys are one people. However I have a big problem with Bangladeshis and Bengalis entering Assam. We have never been conquered by any empires of North or East India, be it the Mauryas,Guptas,Mughals or the Nawabs of Bengal. We beat them all when they tried to conquer us.
No way in hell are we going to all Bangladeshis to kick us out of our land by trying to out breed us...hell no way. Assam is a tinkerbox and when it explodes the immigrant Bangladeshis in our state are going to get slaughtered.

 

MBI MUNSHI

11:07 PM ET

June 21, 2011

FP swallows Indian propaganda claims on border fencing policy

It is a shame that US magazines still remain so undiscerning and uncritical of Indian policy objectives and propaganda aimed at its South Asian neighbors. India's border fencing policy with Bangladesh has nothing to do with climate change or illegal immigration. India would be a far worse sufferer of climate change than Bangladesh with the ocean on three sides (i.e. the Indian Ocean and the Arabian Sea covering India's eastern and western flanks) and the tsunami of 2004 clearly showing that a rise in sea levels would have extremely devastating consequences for India. Bangladesh was completely unharmed by the 2004 tsunami because of the shallow waters on its coastal regions. India will sink long before Bangladesh does in the case of climate change and a corresponding sea rise. This does not mean that Bangladesh will remain unaffected by climate change as cyclones could become more violent and deadly but there is an even chance that such a storm could hit India or Myanmar without ever reaching Bangladesh shores (look at a map).

As for illegal immigration there were only two periods where Bangladeshis/East Pakistanis emigrated to India en masse - in 1947 and 1971. Most of the émigrés in these two periods were Hindus and have settled nicely in Hindu majority India without any intention of returning to Bangladesh. After 1971 illegal immigration to India from Bangladesh has been limited and the overall figure of 20 million immigrants to India is highly exaggerated. If so many Bangladeshis had tried to emigrate to India in the last 30 years then the death rate on the border (from BSF shootings) would be far far higher. It also makes no economic sense for Bangladeshis to emigrate to India. All the Indian states surrounding Bangladesh are far poorer in GDP/PPP terms excepting one - Meghalaya which has virtually no Bangladeshi immigrants. Bangladeshis would also not prefer to go to other parts of India because of cultural, religious and linguistic differences as well as increasing Hindu chauvinism in financially lucrative and wealthy states such as Maharashtra and Gujarat. So in conclusion the argument about illegal immigration to Bangladesh is a fallacious one.

So what is the real reason for India's inhuman border fencing policy with Bangladesh? The obvious rationale for the policy (apart from India's inherent hegemonic tendencies) is preparation for war with China. Under the subservient regime of the present Awami League government under Sheikh Hasina there have been several strategically significant deals already signed or under negotiation with New Delhi such as transit facilities and access to ports as well as other vital infrastructure. These are all intended to help supply the Indian military located in the North East who are presently in a face off with Chinese troops (across the border from disputed Arunachal Pradesh) in Tibet. In the event of war, India could easily access Bangladesh to reach its army positioned in the North East but which is presently limited by the narrow Shilguri pass (or chicken neck) which could be easily blocked during a protracted conflict with China. Having access through Bangladesh provides a convenient alternative route to the North East region. But what has any of this to do with the border fencing policy? The fencing policy has a military objective to fence in Bangladeshis who might prefer to side with China and who could help incite rebellion in the insurgency prone North East states of India in time of war. It is in India's vital national interests to completely isolate and hermetically seal Bangladesh from the North East states. Bangladeshis generally resent Indian expansionist and hegemonic policies (see The India Doctrine (1947-2007)) and could easily find common cause with a sympathetic China. The strategic alignment of Bangladesh under the Awami League with India also has some obvious negative consequences for the country. Bangladesh would be inevitably drawn into a war it does not want and against a country it does not want to fight and has no serious differences with (i.e. China).

In a recent article in PROBE news magazine it was asserted that India was turning Bangladesh into a huge prison through its border fencing policy. It is my assertion that in the event of war India will in fact turn Bangladesh into a giant concentration camp.

 

RAJSINGH

5:30 AM ET

June 22, 2011

ignorance is bliss !!

you post is so much full of ignorant comments that I don't think its worth reply .. may be you are one of those extremists .. watever I just want to say i as an Indian have utmost respect for bangladesh and if you forget we are the one who helped you get independence from tyrannical paki rule ..

The report here was one sided and if you think there are no illegal bangladeshi immigrants in India then you are as ignorant as things can be ... there are millions of them from Mumbai to West bengal to assam .. come over and have a look .. you are most welcome !!

 

MBI MUNSHI

9:03 AM ET

June 22, 2011

ignorance is bliss !!

Mr. Rajsingh,

I assume you spend your spare time counting all these millions of Bangladeshis in India or is that your full time job?

 

GOLDENMIDDLE

12:43 PM ET

June 22, 2011

Munshi: a massive mine of misinformation mis-taught by madrassas

1) All the Indian states surrounding Bangladesh are far poorer in GDP/PPP terms excepting one - Meghalaya which has virtually no Bangladeshi immigrants.
............................................
Refer to the Economist data (An Indian summary: Which countries match the GDP and population of India's states and territories?), for the states adjacent Bangladesh here is the data from 2008/2009: West Bengal ($2429), Assam(1803), Meghalaya (2269), Tripura (2064), Mizoram(2074). In comparison, Bangladesh has a pathetic figure of 1416 from the World Bank (2009) which increases to 1572 (2010) from IMF.

Bangladeshi muslims now outnumber all native people in Assam (assamese, tribals, bengali hindus)in 11 districts. Wonder why is that?

2) Bangladeshis would also not prefer to go to other parts of India because of cultural, religious and linguistic differences as well as increasing Hindu chauvinism in financially lucrative and wealthy states such as Maharashtra and Gujarat.

Not only have they formed ghettos in places like Maharashtra and Gujarat, they commit heinous crimes as well.

"A special squad has been formed by the Mumbai Police to investigate and crack down on the illegal Bangladeshi immigrants in the city. This squad will receive information from the Special Branch (I) and then conduct raids accordingly. Preliminary enquiries have revealed that these agents operate in pockets across the city. The hubs which house the Bangaladeshi population include Vasai, Mira Road (Naya Nagar), Ambujwadi in Malad-Malwani, Kali Basti, Gokuldham, Prem Nagar in Goregaon, Teen Dongri in Andheri, Wadala and P D'mello Road.'

www.mid-day.com/news/2011/may/070511-Bangladeshi-Special-squad-gunny-bag-murder-Ripon-Khan.htm

I am sorry for what happened to Felina, but why are Laizu and Rubina any less important. May all their souls rest in peace.

regards

 

MBI MUNSHI

1:18 PM ET

June 22, 2011

Re: Munshi: a massive mine of misinformation

@GOLDENMIDDLE:

(1) Actually I did not have a madrassah education. That is the Indian prejudice and bigoted attitude showing through. Bangladesh has a higher GDP than any of the Indian states surrounding it (except one) and is far more developed than any of them. They merely have a higher PPP because their population is so tiny but their economies are actually stagnant and depressed while Bangladesh has been booming for the last 10 years. In any case, do you think an illegal Bangladeshi migrant would earn even half of the income figures you mentioned? In all probability he would be worse off in India than in Bangladesh. The preferred destination for Bangladeshi migrants remains the Middle East, Far East, North America and Europe. The reason that the North East has a increasing Muslim population is that during the 1970's and 80's the North East welcomed skilled labor from Bangladesh and the economies at that time were very similar. In recent years (10-15 years) Bangladesh has overtaken North East and West Bengal economically. Those who remained in India after the initial burst of emigration in the 1970's had children there and the increased Muslim population in the North East can be accounted for by including them rather than from any new illegal immigration from Bangladesh. This new Muslim population are actually Indian citizens having been born there and are mainly second or third generation Indians. There was also a significant Muslim population before and after 1947 and so by natural progression their numbers have also increased.

(2) There may be a tiny number of Bangladeshis in Mumbai but these would not number more than a few thousand. Certainly the figure would not be in the hundreds of thousands or millions that is often touted by fanatical Hindu politicians. Even with a special squad formed in the Mumbai police I do not see a huge number of Bangladeshis being arrested or sent back to their country of origin. Mass arrests would have made news but I don't see it.

(3) If Bangladeshi criminals are killing people in India then these are small in number and certainly not state sanctioned. The killings of civilians by the BSF are certainly sanctioned by the State or at lest condoned as no prosecution has even taken place in the last 30 years of murders committed by the BSF.

 

SHAMSUZZOHA

6:50 PM ET

June 30, 2011

ha ha ha...India helped Bangladesh getiing independence

Yes Mr. Raj Singh
We r always grateful to India for your support sheltering the millions of refugees of Bangladesh. We are grateful to India for tarinig and arming our freedom fighters in assistance with international community. Does it provide you free license to grab our land, arm our insurgents, kill our national irrationally ?
And, one thing, you must not forget or try to put under cover, in 1971 our interest coincided.
You wanted Pakistan to be divided, we wanted liberation from Paki rule. Thats it !

 

MBI MUNSHI

11:18 PM ET

June 21, 2011

BSF deaths in 2001 incursion into Banglaedesh

Some commentators have referred to the 2001 incident where 16 BSF were killed after they had entered Bangladesh territory and tried to forcibly occupy land in Sylhet district. The matter requires some further clarification. The BSF had illegally entered Bangladesh and initiated an unprovoked attack on BDR positions in the area. In the counter attack by the BDR supported by thousands of villagers in the locality an estimated 80-200 BSF were killed with only 3 BDR dead. This incident was entirely the fault of the BSF and the BDR were merely defending their country against the hostile and aggressive attack perpetrated from India.

 

RMS

12:46 AM ET

July 9, 2011

Bingo. BDR jawans were

Bingo. BDR jawans were defending their country from foreign invaders. But some posters believe Bangladeshi should be an R&R spot for their BSF guards. A few murders, rapes, citizens tortured? Don't complain! After all the people of Kashmir put up with it all the time!

 

SHAN94

9:11 AM ET

June 22, 2011

The fence is entirely on Indian land

The fence is 150 yards inside the Indian border and is none of the business of bangladeshis or westerners.

If muslim bangladeshis want to leave their over-crowded country, they can migrate to the lands of their religious masters in Saudi Arabia.
Muslim bangladeshis opted out in 1947 and we dont want them back

Adding more muslims is toxic to an infidel country, As Eurabia is finding out today.

 

MBI MUNSHI

9:43 AM ET

June 22, 2011

Re - The fence is entirely on Indian land

Actually according to recent data the border fence has breached the 150 yard rule in around a dozen places. Under international law Bangladesh has every right to complain.

 

GOLDENMIDDLE

12:58 PM ET

June 22, 2011

Munshi data misinformation

1) Show us the data from an unbiased source, or else we have to conclude that you are making mis-statements as seen in the GDP data presented above.

2) Bangladesh is building an anti-India military alliance with China (BBC: Is Chittagong one of China's 'string of pearls'? ) and also Pakistan and other like minded countries:

"The plans involve an ambitious new deep sea port further along the coast, and a motorway running all the way to China - via neighboring Burma. "

3) The result is Bangladesh is reverting back to the situation before 1971 and will form a lose federation with Pakistan, Maldives, Afghanistan (all muslim south asian countries ) backed up by imperial China. From the Times of India today:

"On the other hand, Hasina's decision not to press ahead with the Supreme Court's verdict to restore Bangladesh's secular 1972 Constitution has upset her friends and allies who feel she is backing out, despite a huge mandate, to avoid confrontation with Islamic hardliners.

The Bangladesh Left in Hasina's 14-party alliance has cried foul over the retention of Islam as the state religion, with Communist Party secretary Mujahid-ul-Islam Selim alleging that Bangladesh was fast becoming a "half-Pakistan".

regards

 

GOLDENMIDDLE

1:06 PM ET

June 22, 2011

Bangladesh: one of the worst failed states

As per Foreign Policy only. Thus the fence, no surprises, including the authorss themselves.

.....................................................
India's neighbours Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka in "most failed states" list: Report PTI Jun 21, 2011, 01.15pm IST

NEW YORK: India's neighbours -- Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka -- are featured in the list of the " most failed states", the prestigious Foreign Policy magazine said in its latest annual ranking.

Pakistan is at number 12, Myanmar is at 18, Bangladesh (25); Nepal (27), Sri Lanka (29) and Bhutan is at 50 in a list of 60 countries in which African countries dominate.
...........................................................

Again all the Indian states bordering Bangladesh are 30-55% richer than Bangladesh in GDP (PPP) terms. Look above for details and links.

regards

 

GOLDENMIDDLE

1:06 PM ET

June 22, 2011

Bangladesh: one of the worst failed states

As per Foreign Policy only. Thus the fence, no surprises, including the authors themselves.

.....................................................
India's neighbours Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka in "most failed states" list: Report PTI Jun 21, 2011, 01.15pm IST

NEW YORK: India's neighbours -- Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka -- are featured in the list of the " most failed states", the prestigious Foreign Policy magazine said in its latest annual ranking.

Pakistan is at number 12, Myanmar is at 18, Bangladesh (25); Nepal (27), Sri Lanka (29) and Bhutan is at 50 in a list of 60 countries in which African countries dominate.
...........................................................

Again all the Indian states bordering Bangladesh are 30-55% richer than Bangladesh in GDP (PPP) terms. Look above for details and links.

regards

 

MBI MUNSHI

1:30 PM ET

June 22, 2011

Re -Munshi data misinformation

@GOLDENMIDDLE:

For GDP figures all objective sources show that Bangladesh has a vastly higher GDP than any of the Indians states surrounding it.

Even with an India friendly government in Bangladesh you still claim it has an anti-Indian foreign policy and agenda! I have already mentioned that all the strategically significant deals have been with India and not China. In fact our foreign policy is now more in line with India than with China or Pakistan. But India will not be satisfied until it completely dominates Bangladesh and dictates its foreign policy word for word. It is for this reason it is creating a border fence so as to lock in and isolate Bangladesh. India is preparing for war with China and will force Bangladesh to side with it.

The internal affairs of Bangladesh are no business of India. If the Bangladesh government wishes to retain Islam in the Constitution that you should respect its decision and that of the people.

 

MBI MUNSHI

1:36 PM ET

June 22, 2011

Re: Bangladesh: one of the worst failed states

India would rank lower than any other South Asian country in the FP Failed State index except that only four or five States are holding India up. These States include Maharashtra, Gujarat, Punjab, Tamil Nadu and possibly Kerela. The remaining 24 states are swamped by one or another type of insurgency and suffer from deep economic malaise and backwardness. Corruption is also a massive problem in India as recent scandals suggest.

 

SHAN94

8:28 PM ET

June 22, 2011

International law is 1 yard,

International law is 1 yard, the 150 yard number was simply a sop for mujib

 

SHAN94

8:31 PM ET

June 22, 2011

Islam and Bangladesh

Bangladesh has the right to keep islam enshrined in their constitution.
However, kafir countries have the same right to keep out followers of islam.

Surplus islamic population of Bangladesh can find a home with their Saudi religious masters

 

GOLDENMIDDLE

8:47 PM ET

June 22, 2011

Munshi mistatements continued

1) The total population of states surrounding Bangladesh: 125 million (2008).In comparison: Bangladesh: 155m (2010)

2) GDP (PPP): Total Indian states (above): 288bn (2008). In comparison: Bangladesh 259 (2010)

Remember, a 2010 comparison will make things look even more bleak for Bangladesh.

By any comparison GDP/per capita or total GDP, Munshi is caught again parroting blatant misstatements.

3) Bangladeshis in Mumbai: Munshi's thesis (no bengali muslims will go to Maharashtra/Gujarat is a blatant mis-statement. When actual evidence shown he pretends they are only in thousands not millions.

Not only are these people here are in millions they are notorious for their activities. As many as 75% of these bar girls (illegal in Maharashtra) are from Bangladesh and Nepal.

http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2011-06-11/mumbai/29647140_1_bangladeshi-thefts-maid
http://www.atimes.com/atimes/South_Asia/GD23Df04.html

4) Failed states: Bangladesh's ethnic cleansing of Hindus is a major factor in Failed State calculations: Population has steadily decreased decade on decade (instead of Munshi's mis-claims of migration in 1947 and 1971).

28% (1947), 22% (1951), 18.5% (1961), 13.5% (1974), 11.2% (1991), 9.6% (2001).
In the 2011 census Hindus will be probably at 8% or less. In a few decades there will be no Hindus left in Bangladesh.

In comparison with Bangladesh, Assam and West Bengal will have more Muslims than Hindus in the next two decades.

5) One thing we agree: Munshi claims internal matters of Bangladesh are not India's business. Precisely, the fence is an internal matter of India and none of Bangladesh's business. If it prevents more deaths of illegals like Felani it can be only a good thing.

 

MBI MUNSHI

5:33 AM ET

June 23, 2011

Indian bigotry

Your statements are bigoted and prejudiced and an incitement to hate.

 

MBI MUNSHI

5:35 AM ET

June 23, 2011

Indian bigotry

Your statement is bigoted, prejudiced and an incitement to religious hatred.

 

GOLDENMIDDLE

10:13 AM ET

June 23, 2011

Who is a bigot?

>> bigot, incitement to religious hatred etc

Dear Munshi,

Islamists in the sub-continent believe in the two nation theory which is one of the most bigoted propositions of the 20th century. And one of the greatest bigots who believed in this theory was Hussain Saheed Surawardy, the hero of Bengali muslims, who after directly inciting riots during partition as the Chief Minister of Bengal (killing thousands of Hindus and Muslims) had to finally plead with Gandhi to save muslims.

When the supreme moment came (prime minister of Pakistan) the anti-bengali racist Ayub Khan expelled him to Lebanon and poisoned him.

This is the gold standard for bigots AND inciter to religious hatred AND an useful idiot. But as a famous historian you already knew that.

Good day to you.

regards

 

MBI MUNSHI

10:39 AM ET

June 23, 2011

Who is a bigot?

@GOLDENMIDDLE:

Actually my comment was meant for SHAN94 but for some reason it appeared after your remarks.

Anyway,

You are speaking of events that happened 40-50 years ago and without any background or proof. The Two Nation Theory is still relevant today and can be adapted to fit the new situation. I believe it should not have been a two nation theory but a several nation theory. The British Raj should have been broken up into 15-20 new countries based on religion, ethnicity, culture and language.

 

RMS

12:47 AM ET

July 9, 2011

My objection is to BSF

My objection is to BSF shooting Bangladeshi citizens inside Bangladeshi.
BTW this post is why no SAARC country likes India.

 

RMS

12:48 AM ET

July 9, 2011

Mohandas Gandhi slept with

Mohandas Gandhi slept with naked girls to prove he was not sexually aroused by them.
PM Moraji Desai drank urine.
Good day to you.

 

AHOM47

5:08 PM ET

July 11, 2011

Munshi

Your comparisons are laughable..India has a bigger GDP than Australia and Canada so is India a better place to live? GDP means nothing without Per Capita income.

 

SOMESH GOYAL

9:37 AM ET

June 22, 2011

Fortress India

The article is quite thought provoking.

The bias in the article is quite evident. What is right for the US is wrong for the rest of the world! US manages to kill around 500 Mexicans every year on a border length which is just 1/4th of Indo-Bangladesh border. The Indian record is to be proud of because of the restraint the Indian para military force uses on the border. The authors themselves claim that in the last over one decade only a thousand unauthorised persons have lost their lives on this border. Compared this figure with the figure of US-Mexican border.

According to the United States Border Patrol, 1,954 people died crossing the U.S–Mexico border between the years 1998-2004.[3] In the fiscal year ending September 29, 2004, 460 migrants died crossing the U.S.-Mexico border.[4] In 2005, more than 500 died across the entire U.S.-Mexico border.[5] The number of yearly border crossing deaths has doubled since 1995.[6] In 2009, 417 deaths were reported across the border.[7] Yet the statistics cited by scholars and the media are merely the number of known deaths and do not include those who have never been found, grossly underestimating the actual number of migrants that have died attempting unauthorized border crossings.[8](Courtesy Wikipedia)

Most of the foreign press and non governmental agencies blame Indian government and border guarding agencies for inhuman approach to the issue. Unfortunately nobody seems to consider the following issues:

1. There is Bangladesh Rifles on the other side - Are they so blind that they allow "innocent farmers" to move around the border even after sundown? If not, their complicity in pushing people over to India remains the only other fact.

2. Most of the Bangladeshis will like the world to believe that Indian government is exporting though informally narcotics, arms and ammunition into the peace loving land of Bangladesh. Would some journos try to find out how much revenue is collected annually by Bangladesh Customs by legalising cattle smuggling by charging on pro rata basis? Bangladesh administration is promoting a culture of criminality in trade. They forget that the cartels that smuggle cattle can also smuggle Jehad, fake currency, children for prostitution, arms and so on. There is need for soul searching by the intelligensia of Bangladesh and a deeper study by human rights groups and journalists.

3. Bangladesh is one of the 25 most failed countries of the world. Their economy is in tatters. Fundamentalism is not going to solve their problem. They need to learn to work with neighbours instead of castigating them for everything.

4. Human migration all over the world is restricted by visa regime and international borders. I think this problem can be addressed if land surplus countries of the world throw their borders open to countries like Bangladesh. Authors of this article should search for better and sustainable living spaces in their own countries on humanitarian grounds.

5. Indian government is doing well to raise a border fence which will further reduce these "human rights violations". They should go ahead with such a programme. Bangladesh should be happy that smuggling of narcotics and Phensydil from India to their beloved land will surely reduce.

6. Instead of clamouring for creation of jungle raaj or anarchy on this border, the Bangladeshi diplomats and those who matter should concentrate on simplification of exim policy, visa regimes. More than 200000 legal entrants to India have gone missing in India. Bangladesh needs to recognise the problem. Shakil Ahmed, the slain BDR chief admitted that the people who tried to cross the border at night were not innocent people. If Bangladesh continues to have a tinted view on the issue, she will not alleviate misery of her people.

7. All shades of militant and insurgent groups are known to operate and run training camps from the soil of Bangladesh. Indian is well within her right to preserve her sovereighnty by denying easy access to inimical elements. However, such restriction should not be and is surely not imposed on legal entrants. Cost of obtaining a passport and Indian visa is surely less than a "poor farmer" pays to a tout to illegally breach the fence and trust between two nations.

 

RAJSINGH

8:48 PM ET

June 23, 2011

God knows where MBI MUNSHI gets his data

INdia per capita GDP (PPP) by IMF 2010 - $3339
Bangladesh per capita GDP - $ 1572

now neighboring states per capita GDP (PPP) ( data by economist) : http://www.economist.com/content/indian-summary

West bengal - $ 2429
Assam - $ 1843
Meghalaya- $ 2269
Tripura - $1960
Mizoram - $2074

Now Mr. Munshi i dunno where you get you data from but I want to know where do you get the hatred from.

We never hated bangladeshis we love them and also we know we share common interestes . Its just that the article is bigotry against India and we have a problem of Illegal Bangladeshi immigrants .. also its not only about just illegal immigrants but also about ISI and other terrorists using the porous borders to insite terrorism in India. Its every sovereigns right to protect its territory .

Have a good day !!!

 

MBI MUNSHI

10:15 PM ET

June 24, 2011

MBI Munshi gets his data from IMF and Wikipedia

2010 List by the International Monetary Fund

Rank Country GDP (millions of USD)

57 Bangladesh 104,919

This is a list of States and Union Territories of India by gross domestic product for the financial year 2010 and the exchange rate used was 47.36 Indian Rupees to 1 USD.

West Bengal 84,570

Assam 19,520

Tripura 3,080

Meghalaya 2,640

Manipur 1,830

Nagaland 1,590

Arunachal Pradesh 1,530

Mizoram 1,190

According to national figures only Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh have better GDP figures than Bangladesh. It would appear that the economies of the North East are virtually non-existent when compared to Bangladesh. Because of their tiny population they have a higher PPP relative to Bangladesh but their economies are stagnant and depressed.

 

MBI MUNSHI

10:20 PM ET

June 24, 2011

No reason for Bangladehis to emigrate to India

The GDP figures clearly suggest that Bangladeshis have no reason to emigrate to the North East as their economies are in a far worse condition than in Bangladesh. They would have to duffer discrimination and low wages in India so why go there? It makes no sense and so the building of the border fence has more to do with preparation for war with China (as explained above) than illegal immigration.

 

MBI MUNSHI

10:22 PM ET

June 24, 2011

No reason for Bangladehis to emigrate to India

The GDP figures clearly suggest that Bangladeshis have no reason to emigrate to the North East as their economies are in a far worse condition than Bangladesh's. They would have to suffer discrimination and low wages in India so why go there at all? It makes no sense and so the building of the border fence has more to do with preparation for war with China (as explained above) than illegal immigration or any other explanation put out by the GOI.

 

RAJSINGH

3:45 AM ET

June 25, 2011

what a looser

are my data wrong .. if the states are small the of course you compare per capita GDP .. you said about that in your first post ... don't change subjects ...

No point in arguing with a person like you ..

 

ATIN BHATTACHARYA

5:41 AM ET

June 25, 2011

Berlin Wall?

Calling the Indo-Bangladesh border fence a 'Berlin Wall' is inappropriate. The Berlin Wall was designed to keep East Germans from emigrating to West Germany. India's wall has been designed to prevent Bangladeshis from immigrating illegally. The Berlin Wall helped divide the German nation among two states. India's fence tries to prevent people from one nation illegally migrating into another.

 

SHAN94

10:10 AM ET

June 25, 2011

Lebensraum

If Bangladesh wants Lebensraum, they can get it from their Ummah masters in Saudi Arabia.

Bangladeshis are migrating to India more for political reasons, than economic reasons.

Step one migrate to India
Step two, make Indian border districts muslim majority
Step three , try islamic secession by rioting and terrorism as in 1947

 

ASIF UMER LATIF

12:30 PM ET

July 12, 2011

A Global Player!?

Almost every country seems to be talking about embracing it's place on the stage of the global trade scene, and how the world has to come together in order to resolve issues like environment and terrorism. And yet at the same time every nation seems to be closing in on itself out of fear of the others. I am just wondering what kind of a globalized world it actually is going to be!?

And please don't mind these defensive comments by most of the Indians. It is typical for people from these parts of the world to defend their own no matter cruel, inhumane and wrong their own people are. People how are grown up in a closely knitted family systems will always tend to be sympathetic towards the ill-doings of their own members.

 

ASIF UMER LATIF

1:07 PM ET

July 12, 2011

Corrections

how* cruel
People who*
in closely*

 

SUNIL_NAGAR

6:24 AM ET

July 15, 2011

Fortress India

I'm amazed at the temerity and audaciousness of the authors and Bangladeshi readers by accusing India of securing its boundaries as if entering India is their birthright. If not the boundary wall, what do they expect- an open door on Indian borders for Bangladeshis to meet their past 'peaceful' masters on Western side.

If Bangladesh is doing quite well compared to India as suggested by some people, then there is no need to bother whether India puts up a wall or trench on their side. On the other hand, a secure border will deter poor Bangladeshis from entering India to risk their life so both the arguments put forward are counter-intutive.

 

CRUNCHBERRY21

12:06 AM ET

July 20, 2011

it all adds up

These are all intended to help supply the Indian military located in the North East who are presently in a face off with Chinese troops (across the border from disputed Arunachal Pradesh) in Tibet. In the event of war, India could easily access Bangladesh to reach its army positioned in the North East but which is presently limited by the narrow Shilguri pass (or chicken neck) which could be easily blocked during a protracted conflict with China. Having access through Bangladesh provides a convenient alternative route to the North East region.

So what is the real reason for India's inhuman border fencing policy with Bangladesh? The obvious rationale for the policy (apart from India's inherent hegemonic tendencies) is preparation for war with China. Under the subservient regime of the present Awami League government health under Sheikh Hasina there have been several strategically significant deals already signed or under negotiation with New Delhi such as transit facilities and access to ports as well as other vital infrastructure.