Revolution Road MELTDOWN Gorbachevs Lame Afterlife A Kremlin Built for Two

Meltdown

For the first time, Boris Yeltsin's right-hand man tells the inside story of the coup that killed glasnost -- and changed the world.

BY GENNADY BURBULIS WITH MICHELE A. BERDY | JULY/AUGUST 2011

"That scum!" Boris Yeltsin fumed. "It's a coup. We can't let them get away with it."

It was the morning of Aug. 19, 1991, and the Russian president was standing at the door of his dacha in Arkhangelskoe, a compound of small country houses outside Moscow where the top Russian government officials lived. I had raced over from my own house nearby, after a friend called from Moscow, frantic and nearly hysterical, insisting that I turn on the radio. There had been a coup; Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev had been removed from power.

Five minutes later I was at Yeltsin's dacha, an unassuming two-story yellow brick building, where a small group of his closest associates soon gathered. In addition to me (at the time, his secretary of state), there was Ivan Silayev, the head of the Russian cabinet; Ruslan Khasbulatov, the acting chairman of the Supreme Soviet; Mikhail Poltoranin, the minister of press and mass information; Sergei Shakhrai, the state councilor; and Viktor Yaroshenko, the minister of foreign economic relations. Anatoly Sobchak, the mayor of Leningrad, and Yuri Luzhkov, the deputy mayor of Moscow, arrived not long after. Everyone crowded into Yeltsin's small living room.


Three Days in Foros
In August 1991, Soviet hardlines held Mikhail Gorbachev captive in a last-ditch effort to save the Soviet empire. His foreign policy advisor tells the story.

For months we had half-expected something like this. By the summer of 1991, the Soviet Union was falling apart at the seams. The economy was imploding, the deficit was ballooning, hard currency and gold reserves had been decimated, and Gorbachev's stopgap reforms had only exacerbated the crisis. The notion of a "Soviet people," unified under the banner of socialism, was collapsing along with it. Legislatures in the republics, which had already demanded greater freedoms within the USSR, began calling for independence. By the spring of 1991, five republics -- Armenia, Estonia, Georgia, Latvia, and Lithuania -- had declared it officially. In Russia, democratic forces wanted an end to Soviet totalitarian rule. Our aim was not to allow the chaotic dissolution of the USSR, but to transform it into a confederation that would afford each republic considerable self-determination under its aegis.

We had been moving in this direction for several years. Yeltsin and the other democratic candidates had been elected to the Russian parliament in 1990 with the goal of securing more legally protected rights and freedoms, as well as a market economy, and Yeltsin had been elected president of Russia in June 1991 with almost 60 percent of the vote. But while we were secure in our popular mandate, we were utterly powerless to deal with the greatest threat to Russia: economic collapse. More than 93 percent of the economy, by our estimation, was controlled by the Soviet government. Yeltsin and those of us in his circle of closest associates soon came to believe that unless we were to content ourselves with being nothing more than a ceremonial body, we had to change the legal and economic bases of the union itself.

Gorbachev and a small group of Soviet reformers had accepted this, too. We began to work together on a new union treaty that would transform the Soviet Union into a confederation of sovereign states with a limited central government. Yeltsin planned to sign the controversial pact on Aug. 20.

EDITOR'S NOTE: Gennady Burbulis is visible in profile at far right of photo.
Photo by Oleg Klimov

 SUBJECTS: RUSSIA, EASTERN EUROPE
 

Gennady Burbulis, provost of Moscow's International University, held several high positions in the first Russian government, including secretary of state. Michele A. Berdy is a Moscow-based translator and writer.

MOUSSE69

5:04 AM ET

June 22, 2011

This is great.

This is great.

 

ALEX MARSHALL

5:28 AM ET

June 22, 2011

How convenient...

'It is worth revisiting the story now, not least because the putsch's radioactive fallout has colored Russia's memory of the putsch itself. The coup attempt deprived us of the opportunity to evolve gradually, to gain practical experience, to root out the vestiges of imperial thinking and behavior. It spoiled the promise of a democratic Russia before it had even begun.'

How convenient to blame everything since on three days in August 1991, not least in the way it overlooks the impeccable democrat Yeltsin's own bombing of the White House in 1993, where hundreds more were killed than in the 'putsch' conducted by the 'scum' that Burbulis condemns here. Yeltsin showed how to hold onto power in a situation like that, and Clinton and the West showered him with praises at the time for doing it. History is a wonderful thing, not least because in looking back one is always allowed to re-assess who the real 'heroes' and 'villains' were. The anarchy of the oligarchs that Yeltsin and his friends unleashed has a lot more to do with the problems still facing Russia today than the enfeebled efforts of a few old but gallant communists to preserve a state that they saw quite clearly Yeltsin and Gorbachev between them were about to destroy.

 

LOUISGODENA

10:04 AM ET

June 24, 2011

"... The anarchy of the

"... The anarchy of the oligarchs that Yeltsin and his friends unleashed has a lot more to do with the problems still facing Russia today than the enfeebled efforts of a few old but gallant communists to preserve a state that they saw quite clearly Yeltsin and Gorbachev between them were about to destroy."

How very true! But, the Communists will probably get the last laugh. The promise of a vibrant liberal capitalist utopia has disappeared as completely and as inexorably as last winter's snow. Authoritarianism (and worse) is everywhere on the march in the western democracies. The "social market," western capitalism's ephemeral compromise with Soviet Communism, coming apart at the seams. America's military prowess, long hailed as the trump talisman of the "world's only superpower," is looking increasingly hollow, now seen as wholly untenable unless it destroys the lifeline of the country's elderly, poor, and disabled, in order to feed its insatiable appetite. The "End of History" in 1989 turned out to be the beginning of an inexorble process of syphillitic decline not of socialism, but the bogus triumphalism of its capitalist counterpart. Twenty years after the "collapse of Communism," there are now more Communists on the planet than ever before (the Chinese Party recently surpassed the 80 million member mark). While Soviet Communism will not be replicated any time soon, its vestigial remains will revive and, together with Asian Marxism (including "Socialism with Chinese characteristics") will form the basis of a tenable alternative to a West in steep and irreversible decline.

 

KEYBASHER

12:36 PM ET

July 13, 2011

@LOUISGODENA

"Twenty years after the "collapse of Communism," there are now more Communists on the planet than ever before (the Chinese Party recently surpassed the 80 million member mark). While Soviet Communism will not be replicated any time soon, its vestigial remains will revive and, together with Asian Marxism (including "Socialism with Chinese characteristics") will form the basis of a tenable alternative to a West in steep and irreversible decline."

Don't bet yet.

When a one-party state hosts an Olympics, ten years later that state circles the drain if it isn't already down it. To wit:

1936: Berlin Olympics / Garmisch-Partenkirchen Winter Olympics
1946: Allied Occupation

1980: Moscow Olympics
1990: Collapse of Communism

1984: Sarajevo Winter Olympics
1994: Yugoslav Civil War

2008: Beijing Olympics:
2018: ?

Remember, you heard it here first.

 

RAYFIN3

6:10 AM ET

June 22, 2011

progress

Twenty years and look at the progress! Russia is still pretty much a one-party state, with rampant corruption, and a population with little faith in democracy. At least now the well-heeled have the freedom to live abroad.

 

KEYBASHER

12:22 PM ET

July 13, 2011

And the funny thing, Rayfin, is ...

... that it's still an improvement!

 

COMETLINEAR

11:13 AM ET

July 1, 2011

Great piece.

Thanks for writing it.

 

POLITICALAGENDA

3:43 PM ET

July 13, 2011

Changed the path of history

If the coup had worked and the hardliners had managed to seize and keep power (two very different matters) things could have turned out very differently with the extensive use of miltary force to hold the USSR together. He deserved a better London birthday party.

 

COOLBIT108

2:58 PM ET

July 20, 2011

I bet

I bet he starts his own memoires and blogs them online with www.myblogjob.com