Revolution Road MELTDOWN Gorbachevs Lame Afterlife A Kremlin Built for Two

The Long, Lame Afterlife of Mikhail Gorbachev

A cautionary tale about what happens when you fail to see the revolution coming.

BY ANNE APPLEBAUM | JULY/AUGUST 2011

See a slideshow about Gorby's life in the limelight

In the most notable of the many photographs snapped at the gala held to mark his 80th birthday, Mikhail Gorbachev seems shorter and rounder than he did in his prime, back when he was one of the most important people in the world. He is inscrutable, only half-smiling; he also looks disheveled, and perhaps unsure of himself. Those impressions may of course be exaggerated by the fact that in this particular picture, the onetime general secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union has his arm around Sharon Stone. Stone is wearing a slinky, champagne-colored dress and bright red lipstick. She is grinning widely. In heels, she is a good 6 inches taller than Gorbachev, which certainly takes away from his aura of authority.

But then, it has been a very long time since Gorbachev actually had an aura of authority. In fact, everything about his garish birthday party screamed "B-list celebrity." Stone hasn't starred in a hit movie for a good while; neither has Kevin Spacey, who co-hosted the event alongside her. Also in attendance were Goldie Hawn, Arnold Schwarzenegger, Ted Turner, Shirley Bassey, and, I'm sorry to say, Lech Walesa. The gala was ostensibly a fundraiser for the Raisa Gorbachev Foundation, which helps raise money for the care of children with cancer. But mostly the evening served to underline the strangeness of Gorbachev's fate. Here was the man who had launched glasnost and perestroika, who had presided over the dismantling of the Soviet empire and then the Soviet Union itself, one of the founding statesmen of modern Russia -- and yet his birthday gala was held in the Royal Albert Hall, in London, among people who hardly knew him.

This was not an accident: Twenty years after the dissolution of the USSR, Russia is ambivalent, at best, about Gorbachev. Far from being hailed as a hero, he is mostly remembered as a disastrous leader, if he is remembered at all. Yes, he launched a new era of openness with previously unthinkable freedoms in the 1980s, but in Russia he is also held responsible for the economic collapse of the 1990s. Most Russians don't thank him for ending the Soviet empire either. On the contrary, the current Russian prime minister, Vladimir Putin, has described the dismantling of the Soviet Union as "the greatest geopolitical catastrophe" of the 20th century. An opinion poll released in March, at the time of his birthday, showed that some 20 percent of Russians feel actively hostile toward Gorbachev, 47 percent of Russians "don't care about him at all," and only 5 percent admire him. And this was an improvement: Another poll, in 2005, found active hostility toward him in 45 percent of Russians. The word "perestroika" in Russia today has almost purely negative connotations.

In London and Washington, Gorbachev's reputation is of course more positive. He is regarded with affection -- he was invited to Ronald Reagan's funeral and to George H.W. Bush's own 80th birthday party -- and frequently hailed as a "symbol" of peace and the Cold War's welcome end. But he tends to be paid rather bland and even inappropriate compliments. At his birthday party, Paul Anka sang a duet with a Soviet-era rock musician. The chorus: "One day we'll recall, he was changing the world for us all." Stone then lauded him with a rhetorical question: "Where would Russia be if it weren't reaping the benefits of a free democracy?" I wish I'd been there to see the embarrassment on the faces of the spectators at the Royal Albert Hall -- for Russia has not actually reaped the benefits of free democracy, as every Russian in the room knew perfectly well. Even Gorbachev himself recently described Russian democracy as a sham: "We have institutions, but they don't work. We have laws, but they must be enforced."

Ian Gavan/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: RUSSIA, EASTERN EUROPE
 

Anne Applebaum, author of Gulag: A History, is a columnist for the Washington Post and Slate.

COMETLINEAR

11:05 PM ET

June 19, 2011

Permit me to ruminate for a bit...

1. My most vivid memories of Gorbachev are from when he visited San Francisco. People screamed and clawed for a glimpse, as if he were The Beatles.

2. One of the lesser known tragedies of the fall of the USSR was the mothballing of the Buran: the Soviet Space Shuttle. The most expensive project in the history of the great Soviet space program, this spacecraft resembled our Space Shuttle in appearance only. It was far more powerful, and after a successful unmanned orbital test, its future appeared bright.

3. I lived in a commune for a number of years. I concluded that such a system is doomed to failure unless all participants are committed. Inevitably, their children are attracted to the dazzle of Western capitalism and leave the commune.

Soviet communism would grow weaker and weaker with every technological advance which brought images of Western opulence into their homes. Perhaps not unlike what is happening in the autocratic Mideast regimes today.

Thanks for writing this article. I will always admire Mr. Gorbachev.

 

COMETLINEAR

11:09 PM ET

June 19, 2011

By the way, enjoy this photo...

...of President Reagan during his visit to the USSR. Many people believe that the man on the left with the camera is actually Vladimir Putin, working for the KGB, undercover as a tourist:

http://i.imgur.com/YQqmd.jpg

 

SUHAILI

5:35 PM ET

June 20, 2011

are you kidding?

no body plans history. not even god. be grateful that he had not tried to have things his way.

 

PUZZLED.PERSON

10:50 AM ET

June 21, 2011

Maybe visit a Russian cancer ward?

Sorry but the author seems to have missed the point. It seems to me that whatever Gorbachev does to raise money for cancer care and research is great and should be encouraged. It would be great if other people in similar positions made a similar effort (in spite of the people who will no doubt write such articles)--yeah sure he may not have done everything perfectly, but it still seems good to me to try to raise money any way possible now. Have you tried to imagine what it must be like treating childhood cancer in Russia? Seriously?

 

F PAIT

12:47 PM ET

June 21, 2011

Lame afterlife?

I suppose a two-time winner of Nobel prizes could call Mr Gorbachev's life after the breakup of the Soviet Union lame. But how strong and able do you have to be to write a Foreign Policy blog?

 

ORMONDOTVOS

4:40 PM ET

June 21, 2011

Badly informed and very biased blogpost...

Should appear as the definition of Monday morning quarterbacking in wikipedia.

First Anne gives a negative and putdown spin on everything Gorby does. Then she sticks in a very short disclaimer, but proceeds to tell us that "ignorance is no excuse."

Uh, Ms. Applebaum, that's a phrase about law, not predictions of political turmoil. Or maybe you'd like to point out all the policy decisions you've made in government.

Oh. You've never been elected. I see.

 

CJ1958

5:31 PM ET

June 21, 2011

Give Gorby a Break

If anything is lame, it's the tone of this article. It's easy to criticize someone you've never liked to begin with by pointing out everything he's ever done that you didn't like. Mr Gorbachev will be judged by history which I hope the person who wrote this won't be contributing to and give the rest of us a break.

I particularly love how she uses the fact that Mr Gorbachev supervised the transfer of power in a manner that required a minimum amount of violence into an excuse to further bash him over the head for being a big, bad communist.
Her bias is excruciatingly obvious and her "I told you so' approach is an embarrassment.

This is such a poor excuse for an article that I wonder what sense I have in even commenting about it at all.

 

PALMER

2:04 PM ET

June 22, 2011

I second the motion

Sometimes events take on a life of their own and exceed the ability of even very talented statesmen to control or manage them. The breakup of the Soviet Union was like that. Gorbachev deserves great credit for the change he initiated. He does not deserve the blame for what Russia has become--Yeltsin and Putin were the architects of the failure of Russia to democratize.

It is indeed sad that Gorbachev has not had more influence on events post-USSR. But the bashing in this article is undeserved.

 

DAVE145

11:20 PM ET

June 22, 2011

FP should be ashamed of this tabloid headline and tainted screed

I second the critical comments made above. I haven't read FP in a while, and am saddened to see it has become more tabloid.

Not all your readers may know that the author, Anne Applebaum, moved to Poland in 1988 and married Poland's Foreign Minister, Rados?aw Sikorski in 1992, with whom she has two children. (She's also won awards from Estonia and Hungary.)

The decline in popularity of Gorbachev during the long rein of former KGB-head Vladimir Putin says more about Putin and Russia than it does about Gorbachev.

Even someone as biased and anti-Russian as Applebaum should recognize this.

As for FP... I see no reason to come back soon.

 

CRABBIEAPPLETON

9:19 PM ET

June 23, 2011

Misplaced snark?

This piece certainly takes the tabloid low road by calling Gorbachev a "b-lister." What on earth does that have to do with . . . well, anything?

Oh, and by the way, Kevin Spacey is Artistic Director of the Old Vic in London, so, as far as actors are concerned, that's pretty A-list.

 

CMURPHY9059

11:51 PM ET

June 23, 2011

Ms. Applebaum seems to think

Ms. Applebaum seems to think communist education causes greed. Well perhaps that is true. But it is certainly not limited to "communist" education. One need only look to the behaviour of our own American elites to see that.

The MBAs and lawyers that fill the ranks of our kleptocrat bankers certainly didn't receive communist educations.

 

LOUISGODENA

9:38 AM ET

June 24, 2011

A Vexing Contradiction

So, according to Ms Applebaum, Mr Gorbachev persistent unpopularity (he received a whopping 1% of the vote at his last presidential run!) is due to his failure to "dismantle" the Soviet Union in 1988? On the other hand, Mr Putin, who publicly laments the break-up of that same Soviet Union, enjoys widespread popularity. Perhaps Ms Applebaum should recall that fully 70% of those voting within the republics of the Soviet Union endorsed the preservation of the USSR in 1991, just nine months before the country was dissolved. What is popular among western intellectual and business elites is not necessarily the first choice of the masses of people around the word, including here in the U.S. Incidentally, if the author wants to view a state in the here-and-now that is truly despised by many of its citizens (someday to be a majority) she should look to her own state of Israel.

 

VERBATIM

12:47 PM ET

July 2, 2011

Long, lame gossipy account

What a waste of words in this cheap shot! Words seldom fail us; they can only fail the use to which we put them.

 

KEYBASHER

11:55 AM ET

July 13, 2011

Gorby at Hyde Park

A couple of years back, while visiting FDR's home at Hyde Park, NY, I saw Gorbachev with an interpreter and a guide giving him a personal tour. It later turned out that he was in town to receive some inconsequential award which think tanks around the world like to give. Without his late wife or his late job (I pitied him the one but not the other), he looked as though he was at a complete loss for what to do with the rest of his life.

 

POLITICALAGENDA

3:29 PM ET

July 13, 2011

A sad and unfair fate For Gorbachev - it is what he did not do

When historians look back they will see how important Gorbachev was in terms of what he did not. He could have tried to hold it all together by use of military force he chose not to or at least not to pursue that course with the same vigour as past Soviet leaders. His birthday was a bit tacky though hopefully he can have a more appropriate Christmas party as befits his past achievements. Alas he seems to be the forgotten man of recent history

 

POLICYWEONK

2:11 PM ET

July 17, 2011

Failed to become a tycoon and no KGB pedigree

If you look at the current power players in Russia there is a preponderance of tycoons and ex KGB types (Putin being both via Gunvor and his $40bn alleged fortune - seems a bit high) holding power directly and indirectly. Gorbachev's power base came from the old Communist party structure which he himself helped to dismantle. Thereafter he seemed increasingly a passenger of events rather than a driver of them. If you were a general in the much diminished Soviet army you do not have a lot to thank him for. The transition to capitalism was pretty rocky too and for many the roads turned not to be paved with gold (gold just for a few really) something which he took the blame for from your average Russian citizen. I suspect history will treat him more kindly.