Crystal Clear

Yes, rows of numbers can help predict revolutions. You just have to know where to look.

BY JAY ULFELDER | JUNE 22, 2011

In "Dark Crystal" (July/August 2011), Foreign Policy managing editor Blake Hounshell discusses social scientists' apparent failure to predict the momentous revolutions of 2011 and concludes that "looking at rows of numbers is a lousy, or at least insufficient, way to predict" the occurrence of nonviolent popular uprisings. Hounshell is probably right about the "insufficient" part, but I think he's wrong about the "lousy" part. In fact, my own recent analysis gives us grounds for cautious optimism about the usefulness of quantitative methods for forecasting these kinds of events.

From 2001 until the end of 2010, I served as research director for the Political Instability Task Force, a U.S. government-funded research program that develops statistical models to help forecast and explain various forms of political crisis and change in countries worldwide. In early 2011, in preparation for a workshop organized by the Council on Foreign Relations, I used a statistical technique called Bayesian model averaging (BMA) to develop an algorithm that can use data on a number of social, economic, and political conditions to estimate the probability that a given country will experience an onset of nonviolent rebellion in the coming year. Leaning on prior research by Erica Chenoweth and Maria Stephan, a nonviolent rebellion was defined for this project as a "campaign of purposive, nonviolent mass events in pursuit of a political objective." Using this definition, occasional demonstrations or strikes do not count as nonviolent rebellion; for protest activity to qualify, it must be both purposeful and sustained. For example, the large-scale and repeated anti-government demonstrations in Syria in early 2011 would certainly qualify as nonviolent rebellion, while the sporadic protests so far in Algeria would not.

These kinds of uprisings are historically rare events with complex causes, and as such, they are extremely difficult to predict with precision. Nevertheless, it turns out that a statistical model -- or, in this instance, a weighted average of several models -- could have done a good job of identifying the Middle Eastern and North African countries that have experienced popular uprisings this spring as among the most susceptible to these events in 2011. When all countries worldwide are listed in descending order according to their estimated likelihood of an onset of nonviolent rebellion this year, Egypt ranks 4th; Syria stands 6th; Libya is 25th; Tunisia is 28th; and Yemen is 33rd. With more than 160 countries on the full list, these rankings land almost all of these countries in the top 20 percent of the global rankings, an admittedly arbitrary but nonetheless useful threshold for identifying most-likely cases from forecasts like these. Crucially, the historical data used in developing this algorithm only covered the period 1972-2009, so the statistical analysis did not get to learn from the supposedly surprising events we're trying to forecast in 2011. In other words, this is not a case of the kind of "hindsight bias" sociologist Charles Kurzman appropriately bemoans in Hounshell's article.

Given how reliable these forecasts have proved to be so far, I think it's worth noting that the country pegged by this algorithm as the most likely candidate for nonviolent rebellion in 2011 is China. China reportedly experiences tens of thousands of scattered protests, riots, and strikes each year, but many observers of that country's politics dismiss those events as background noise in an otherwise well-managed political system. For example, in a March 12, 2011, op-ed in the Wall Street Journal, Francis Fukuyama points to the "higher quality" of authoritarianism in China and the cohesiveness and nationalism of its military to conclude that "China will not catch the Middle Eastern contagion anytime soon." Without putting too much weight on one number, I think it's fair to say my analysis shows that the country may be riper for nonviolent rebellion than many China watchers believe. Although neither the recent riots in Guangdong province nor the protests in Inner Mongolia would qualify as nonviolent rebellions under this project's definition, they would seem to support the view that the potential for social unrest in that country is substantial.

KHALED DESOUKI/AFP/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: CHINA, MIDDLE EAST
 

Jay Ulfelder is a political scientist who theorizes and forecasts regime survival and change, democratization, and violent conflict. He blogs as the Dart-Throwing Chimp.

ERIK BIRD

3:14 PM ET

June 22, 2011

great quote from Jay Ulfelder's blog

Quote from Jay Ulfelder's blog:

"What’s needed to do this particular analysis better is higher-resolution data on dynamics of nonviolent rebellion. That kind of data would allow us to differentiate more subtly between situations like Egypt’s and, say, Sudan’s. Some scholars are doing excellent work right now using software to turn news reports into event data that should enable kind of analysis, but to the best of my knowledge, we’re not there yet."

Also, if the country uses social networks on the internet, perhaps data from there or data from search engine queries and financial transactions. Getting some of this data can be difficult, for example look at the blog post entitled "SWIFT and asymmetric control of data" over at Marcy Wheeler's blog, Emptywheel. Swift is the main interbank communication network. Credit card transaction data might be useful. It's not like the U.S. military is new to the game of gaining access to cell phone records or listening in on calls. Financial companies have been automating the processing of financial news for quite some time too. Opens a pretty big Pandora's box but it has been opened by others for a long time now(google, financial companies) yet no one seems to want to admit it. Perhaps forcing U.S. military intelligence to be a lot more transparent would help with the checks and balances (and fraud in defense contracting).

 

SIOX262

11:21 AM ET

July 22, 2011

I don't know

I am still thinking that data used on social networks or internet queries should not be something everyone should have access to. And especially when you talk about financial transaction data. This data is highly confidential and should never be shared.
I mean everyone can have a different opinion about that but that is mine. My company (a werbeagentur) creates websites for clients and we have to deal with security related questions for shop systems day in and day out. And we have to meet all criteria in order to publish the finished website. I think a country should do the same. Neet the criteria and not share confidential data with another country. And I guess this goes for both ways.

 

ERIK BIRD

6:50 PM ET

June 23, 2011

Ulfelder formerly worked at SAIC

Interesting to note that according to his blog, Dart-Throwing Chimp, Jay Ulfelder formerly worked at SAIC, the wonderful folks who gave us Trailblazer and NY CityTime. Trailblazer was a failed information management software project that cost the NSA 1 billion and was at the core of the Thomas Drake whistleblowing prosecution, covered by 60 minutes and the new yorker among others.

 

TAVARES

12:30 AM ET

July 20, 2011

Financial companies have been

Financial companies have been automating the processing of financial news for quite some time too. Tavares Opens a pretty big Pandora's box but it has been opened by others for a long time now (google, financial companies) yet no one seems to want to admit it.

 

POLITICALAGENDA

7:34 PM ET

July 20, 2011

It is a strange one

Yes it is strange I seek to recall the collapse of Eastern Europe was not predicted either. But then at the same time nor was the 2009 banking collapse. What is wrong with us? I mean all the info was publicly available too. The other thing is that it really is like the old dominos theory too where a cllapse in one country causes a collapse in another. I really hope the same does not apply to national debt problems because if it does come
Christmas where will the world be? Also how come Libya and Syria seem to be holding out when other countries fell?