The Road Home from Kabul

Drawing down troops from Afghanistan is the right move. Now it's time to focus on the real threat in the neighborhood: the one coming from Pakistan.

BY JOHN KERRY | JUNE 24, 2011

This week, President Barack Obama fulfilled a promise he made to the American people in 2009 to begin responsibly ending the war in Afghanistan. His decision to withdraw 33,000 troops from the country over the next year came from a position of strength, thanks in large part to our men and women in uniform and their civilian counterparts who helped break the Taliban's momentum.

We brought Osama bin Laden to justice and defeated al Qaeda in Afghanistan. It is now time to reduce the U.S. footprint and for Afghans to take charge of their country and its future. It is time to focus on the real threats in the region: those that emanate from Pakistan.

Much work remains to be done, and the withdrawal should be seen as the beginning of a new path toward success. The steps that the United States, the Afghans, and the international community need to take in the coming months are clear and achievable.

First, we must recognize that we will still be fighting two separate but intertwined wars. The first is against Mullah Omar's Taliban in southern Afghanistan, the group that provided sanctuary to al Qaeda. We must make sure they never do that again. The president's surge gave our military the forces it needed to launch robust operations against the Afghan Taliban, weaken its base, and force its leaders to consider negotiations as a way to survive. Our reconciliation efforts are mostly aimed at this group, which may be driven by a radical interpretation of Islam but whose interests are confined to Afghanistan.

The other war is against those who are likely irreconcilable and dedicated to attacking us, chiefly the Haqqani network and its allies in eastern Afghanistan and western Pakistan. As our troops shift from the south to the east, their mission should shift accordingly from counterinsurgency to counterterrorism. It's the job of the Afghan security forces to win hearts and minds. Along the border with Pakistan, where insurgent groups pose a major threat, we should continue to train and work closely with elite Afghan units and the Pakistani military to root them out once and for all. There will be no rest for those who seek to do us harm.

Second, we must work with Pakistan to satisfy both our interests in Afghanistan and Islamabad's. This won't be easy. Relations between the two countries have deteriorated sharply since bin Laden was killed near Pakistan's premier military academy. American politicians and the public have responded with incredulity to the notion that the world's most wanted man was hiding in plain sight a couple of hours from the capital city of Islamabad, and Pakistan's leaders were angered and embarrassed by the violation of the country's sovereignty. The task is difficult, too, because some insurgent networks have long-standing ties to the Pakistani state, which has used them as proxies in the fight against India and permits them sanctuaries from which they attack U.S. troops in Afghanistan. At the same time, other insurgents have attacked Pakistani security forces and civilians, killing more than 35,000 people.

Despite these differences, there is common ground with Pakistan. We have shared interest in a political deal to end the conflict in Afghanistan and allow the exodus of U.S. troops. We also share an interest in reining in the extremists who are attacking Pakistan and avoiding another Mumbai-style attack that could destabilize Pakistan-India relations. We need to build on these common interests.

SHAH MARAI/AFP/Getty Images

 

U.S. Sen. John Kerry is chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

ANARCHTEACHER

6:42 PM ET

June 24, 2011

anarchteacher

Obama, in his speech on Afghanistan, never mentioned the most important factor in our continued presence in that "graveyard of empires" -- The Narcosaurus.

It is something never openly discussed in Wall Street bank board rooms or the network news rooms of the mainstream media.

Certainly never before the American people.

But it is one of the central driving factors of our imperial foreign policy with the Third World, and has been for decades.

Senator John Kerry discovered this in the 1980s in his investigation of the Reagan administration's narcotic linkage to Iran-Contra.

Last week we observed the 40th anniversary of the beginning of Richard Nixon's War on Drugs upon the American people.

When will we observe the commencement of the covert War for Drugs, which has lasted over sixty years, and whose massive institutional corruption, money-laundering, and military interventions have fueled the military-industrial complex and the National Security State?

http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/742...

 

SAMAD

12:49 AM ET

June 25, 2011

Educate not Kill

I have always been an advocate of "winning the hearts and minds of the Afghan people" argument. Brute military force, can win wars, but is never a recipe for long term peace and stability. Two wrongs do not make a right, and American policy in the region has only served to exacerbate the level of resentment felt against the United States. If the War on Terror only manages to increase the level of extremism, something somewhere has gone terribly wrong.

I originate from Pakistan, and have witnessed how the country has descended into chaos and anarchy. As a child, while living in Islamabad, I have visited madrassahs, and know from personal experience how the mindsets of young, unsuspecting minds are altered irrevocably. These rigid institutions are designed to ensure conformity to the twisted brand of Islam that they vociferously endorse, one that not only enjoins the use of violence to counter the infidels but in the process also defiles a religion that advocates peace and tolerance. These are not educational centers committed to equipping their graduates to compete in an increasingly globalised world but instead are ideological factories that manufacture radicalism and intolerance.

If the United States is resolute in its bid to root out extremism, it should educate, educate and educate. All too often, American aid is spent on the army, which ironically has its own interests, none more patent than using the extremists as a tool to counter India. And not to forget the civilian government which apart from being listless is corrupt to the bone. The little money that does filter through a defunct system is too little to make an impact.

Let me also clarify why anti- American sentiment finds such a ready home in Pakistan. Its not because the Pakistanis have an inherent disliking for the United States. Not because the Pakistanis are all militants bent on aggression. While most foreigners will relegate the average Pakistani to the status of an extremist, I refuse to accept this naïve and possibly fallacious explanation. I know, as many others, that the average Pakistani is not a terrorist, does not receive training in heavy artillery and does not harbor ambitions of destroying the Western civilization in the quest for a greater Islamic empire. Let me tell you what the average Pakistani wants. All he wants is a permanent job, a house that he can call his own and the protection that comes with being a citizen of a sovereign country. Give me that and you can safely live in your country while we in ours.

Abdul Samad is a sophomore majoring in International Relations in Georgetown University, School of Foreign Service.

 

NPEGASUS

12:42 AM ET

June 26, 2011

Educate but also kill

The responsibility of educating masses in Pakistan must be borne by the privileged Pakistanis and the Pakistani government. We have rarely, or never, see that happen. Despite educational crises, Pakistan has dropped its total expenditure on education asking someone else – US in this case – to shoulder responsibility of educating millions of its citizens. Lack of resources cannot be the reason; if acquiring more nukes is the priority for Pakistan then building schools suddenly becomes the world’s problem.

Poverty or illiteracy is not linked to terrorism. Per recent study, it is the privileged and the middle class in Pakistan that tend to harbor radicalism while enjoying the benefits of modern education at home or abroad. The poor in Pakistan, who may want the same things like anyone else, are the fodder for executing terrorist acts that are often planned in the safe houses of Pakistani military. The responsibility of cleaning hearts and minds starts with itself – in this case changing the national narrative which is hubristic and divisive.

 

VANISLESCOTTY

9:49 AM ET

June 26, 2011

Abdul Samal said, "Brute

Abdul Samal said, "Brute military force, can win wars, but is never a recipe for long term peace and stability." This simply is not true.

While there is much to admire in your sentiments and I take a few things away from what you said, this line is simply not true and truly shows a massive ignorance of history. We used 'brute military force' in WWII against Germany and Japan to a far greater extent than anything either Afghanistan or Pakistan has seen to date. And yet at the end of the war what we got was 'long term peace and stability' with these countries. In fact, we remain allies and friends to this day. So it is quite possible to have 'brute military force' and 'long term peace and stability' at the same time with the same combatants.

There simply is something else in play here. Of course responding with force increases the level of response and the number of people responding. That was true in WWII and its true today. So that is not what is at play here. Something else is in play. While many (most) Pakistani and Afghan people may be peace loving and share the same hopes of the average American in wanting financial stability and basic needs met, there still is something structurally wrong with the culture that allows this brand of extremism to flourish to the extent that it does. That is something that must come from within these two countries. We can educate all we want, but if the religious and political leaders foment messages of hate, than the problem will continue. I do agree we need to do what we can to win over the hearts of the people. But again, that can't come at the expense of dealing with the security issues.

I appreciate your insider's view on the matter but would encourage you to rethink your propositions here.

 

COMETLINEAR

11:53 AM ET

June 26, 2011

Irrelevant and off topic

Here's the Anti-Israel Troll Express, right on time.

 

COMETLINEAR

11:55 AM ET

June 26, 2011

 

PKOULIEV

5:32 PM ET

June 26, 2011

Samad's Comments

Thank you Samad for your comments, especially this paragraph:

"If the United States is resolute in its bid to root out extremism, it should educate, educate and educate. All too often, American aid is spent on the army, which ironically has its own interests, none more patent than using the extremists as a tool to counter India. And not to forget the civilian government which apart from being listless is corrupt to the bone. The little money that does filter through a defunct system is too little to make an impact."

As the World Bank, IMF, the UN and the US government waste taxpayers' money to buy out corrupt government officials and military personnel in countries like Pakistan and Afghanistan, common people don't benefit from ultimate results of building civil framework of society and institutions providing financial stability and taking care of fiscal responsibility and accountability by reporting to electorate and citizens.

 

PKOULIEV

6:14 PM ET

June 26, 2011

Reply to VANISLESCOTTY's Comments

I don't think culture has anything to do with breeding religious militant groups or network. Historically, extremist or radical leaders came to power based on poverty in countries, not middle class. You mentioned World War II. Hitler came to power by election of poor people under his propaganda and beliefs. In 1917, Lenin and Stalin came to power same way and used Red Terror to kill many innocent people. I would not think social-economic factors touching people's everyday economic life have anything to do with culture. Indeed, the US government had Marshall Plan implemented in Germany after the war under strict guidelines of political and economical reforms. This is not a case when the US government wastes money in countries like Pakistan, Afghanistan, Yemen, etc. without urging those governments to implement same reforms.

As you noticed Mr. Samad studies at Georgetown University in the USA. There are many young people like him from other countries too sharing universal human rights values given to everybody at birth by the God and stated in the Declaration of Independence and the USA Constitution. All these young people from different countries use same high-tech to access worldwide communication means to share their experiences, thoughts and concerns. Some the US politicians and scholars try to attach problems arising in these countries to their culture without realizing that young people immigrating to the US accept same values, have same dreams, use opportunities and want their historical homelands to become a part of same civilization instead people escaping their countries.

 

TEXIMEXI

10:00 PM ET

July 1, 2011

It is time

The pursuit of US military dominance is an illusion, the principal effect of which is to distort strategic judgment by persuading policymakers that they have at hand the means to make short work of history’s complexities. The real need is to wean the United States from its infatuation with military power and come to a more modest appreciation of what force can and cannot do.We have to come to the painful conclusion that we have created much of the terrorism and anti-Americanism that we are subject to via our terrible foreign policies. It will be difficult to protect us from blowback without fixing our own foreign policy. We should, however, pack up and leave these folks alone with their Taliban, ak-47, handmade jewelry, and all that good stuff.

 

MARTY MARTEL

8:16 PM ET

June 24, 2011

Senator Kerry's whitewash and wishful thinking

Senator John Kerry is paddling the same whitewash and wishful thinking that he has until now.

Previous US ambassador Anne Patterson to Pakistan, wrote in a secret review in 2009 that ‘Pakistan's Army and ISI are covertly SPONSORING four militant groups - Haqqani‘s HQN, Mullah Omar‘s QST, Al Qaeda and LeT - and will not abandon them for any amount of US money‘, as diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks show.

No matter how John Kerry spins it, Ambassador Patterson had NO reason to mislead her own State Department and U. S. government.

And Pakistani Army and ISI will continue to support their proxies' (whom Pakistani Army/ISI will NOT abandon for any amount of US money as per ambassador Patterson) fight against US/NATO troops in Afghanistan from their safe shelters in Pakistan even with U. S. ready to leave. Ambassador Patterson has clearly told us that much even if Senator Kerry does NOT want to believe it.

Kerry’s whitewash about Pakistani being threatened by same fundamentalists as Afghanistan will not wash when Pakistani Army/ISI are SPONSORING those very fundamentalists led by Osama bin Laden, Mullah Omar, Haqqani and Hafiz Saeed as ambassador Patterson reported.

At this stage in the game after the death of Osama bin Laden and ten long years of war, as far as the US is concerned, the war on terror is over; feeble clarifications by the State Department, that the larger war on Al Qaeda shall continue, are inconsequential. Pakistan knows that by skillfully holding out till now, it is close to getting its proxy regime in place in Kabul . Pakistani and American interests, both short-term and medium-term, converge at this point; a broke and tired America can not afford to look at long-term interests, not at this moment.

And thereby hangs a tale — of Pakistani and American perfidy. The US has been, and shall always remain mindful of the “paranoia of Pakistan ”; Islamabad ’s sensitivities, its faux victimhood, will always take precedence over Afghanistan in Washington .

Obama administration is already asking Pakistan to provide access to Afghan Taliban leaders safely ensconced under Pakistani ISI/Army's protection. A facade of Vietnam-style peace deal as dictated by Pakistan will be reached with Afghan Taliban leaders chosen by Pakistan . US will begin its drawdown and finally exit the theater of a war it is desperate not to be seen as having lost, not so much to the Taliban and Al Qaeda as to the wily Generals of Rawalpindi who have proved to be smarter than the Americans.

That facade of peace will crumble within few years after the departure of US troops and Pakistan will bring Afghanistan under its suzerainty with reimposition of Taliban rule just as it did in 1996 while Uncle Sam will helplessly look the other way.

 

NPEGASUS

1:53 AM ET

June 26, 2011

Stop living in fear

TARQUINIS:

I wonder what would've Americans done if some country had to scaffold the communist Soviet Union from the outside because it was too big and it had nukes. The US, ironically, has been scaffolding the powers in Pakistan, which we wrongly believe are more dangerous if they are left unaided. The result: we get blackmailed, threatened and manipulated by a weak state, like Pakistan.

Repeating the same mistake is insane. Like communist Soviet Union, Islamic Pakistan is a failed idea. Cut Pakistan loose from the clutches of aid. Allow ourselves to see how Pakistan shapes up or let the cookie crumble. Last but not the least; let us stop living in fear.

 

PETERBERGEN

8:55 AM ET

June 26, 2011

Splitting Pakistan is the best

Just free up and salvage what you can. Baluchistan can be saved. Those folks can become independent and they can survive on their own.

Same with Sind. They too can go on their own and Survive on their own.

NWFP may as well joing with Southern Pahstoons as Pastoonistan and be a free country.

Only the rest of Pakistan can fail and choke on their own n00ks.

 

STEVEDAVIS

12:17 AM ET

June 27, 2011

my friend you are forgetting

my friend you are forgetting Punjab as along as Punjab is united with Pakistan no one can do anything about Pakistan cheers , Sticker Printing

 

AFGHANGOOD

8:54 PM ET

June 24, 2011

Going to war again?

Are we now going to declare war on Pakistan?

 

JOHN CAMERON

10:40 PM ET

June 24, 2011

End of empire?

Has Kerry found his neocon? Why are we involed in this tribal warfare? Is there a good guy or bad guy, is there a winning side? How many wars can we afford to be in as this country slides towards default on its debt. What will happen in this country as it fails apart? Where is this countries priorities?

 

STEVEM

8:33 AM ET

June 25, 2011

"Threats", "Threats" And More "Threats"

"Now it's time to focus on the real threat in the neighborhood: the one coming from Pakistan."

What threat? To whom? The United States? How? What exactly is America supposed to do with Pakistan?

Maybe it's time for the U.S. to admit it can't fix the world.

And OBTW, recognize that handing over weapons systems to autocrats is not "foreign aid". Those are bribes that sustain the hate.

 

HEADOFFICE

9:16 AM ET

June 25, 2011

when proxy armies back fire!!

Reagan: These gentlemen(Taliban) are the moral equivalents of America's founding fathers.....1985

Kerry: Our reconciliation efforts are mostly aimed at this group, which may be driven by a radical interpretation of Islam but whose interests are confined to Afghanistan...2011

Proxy army do fire back whenever misshandled....reminds me Rambo first blood

 

BEINGTHERE

3:28 PM ET

June 25, 2011

IPS: "Deferring to Petraeus ... Taliban Growth Not Registered"

Why should the American people trust Kerry or any other D.C. biggie? Neither they nor military leadership will clearly explain why we have spent time, blood and money in Afghanistan. Certainly, some information must be secured, but is the security for the sake of our country, or to protect and promote the big career of a man in an overtly and overly decorated Army uniform? Read on:

From Inter Press Service Gareth Porter), 2/14/11-WASHINGTON:
"Despite evidence that the Taliban insurgency had grown significantly in 2010, the U.S. intelligence community failed to revise its estimate for Taliban forces as part of a National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on Afghanistan in December. That unusual decision was in deference to Gen. David Petraeus (title description), who did not want any official estimate of the insurgency's strength that would contradict his claims of success by Special Operation Forces in reducing the capabilities of the Taliban in 2010."

And this is the "honorable" man who will soon lead our CIA. Hell,according to the article excerpt above, he's already got the people who'll report to him by the balls.

 

CLAWHAMMER JAKE

4:46 PM ET

June 25, 2011

Pitiful. Just pitiful.

I expect twaddle like this from Republicans. Democrats should know better.

 

VANISLESCOTTY

1:28 AM ET

June 26, 2011

Twaddle is as twaddle does

That's interesting, because I expect twaddle like this from a Democrat and wasn't disappointed.

 

VANISLESCOTTY

1:32 AM ET

June 26, 2011

A late learner but...

Mr. Kerry said, "we cannot repeat the mistakes of the past by abandoning the region." At least he's learning from his past mistakes, i.e. Vietnam.

 

MUTT3003

10:33 AM ET

June 26, 2011

Why?

Can anyone tell me why a senator is conducting our foreign policy? Isn't that for the Executive branch? Between him and Mccain, in Egypt, what is the State Department doing? Apparently that department can be eliminated as part of deficit reductions.

 

AATAYYAB

11:21 AM ET

June 26, 2011

pls. STOP bashing Pakistan and STOP wars

where is all this war-mongering will lead you all into? why is human blood so attractive for occupiers?

 

AATAYYAB

11:23 AM ET

June 26, 2011

about the heading

did you notice a hypocrisy here? someone posted an anti-Pakistan heading and then quickly changed it into "road to kabul". let's see if the writer himself sees that error. john kerry travels to pakistan with a message for peace but writes about it in such an animosity way, nothing reconciling in his comments.

 

AATAYYAB

11:24 AM ET

June 26, 2011

this site is more like BASHING Islam and Pakistan

want to see the proof? just read most of its articles. i can bet it is being run by some neocons or zionists out there.

 

COMETLINEAR

12:04 PM ET

June 26, 2011

You mean the Jews, right?

Why don't you just come out and say it?

 

NPEGASUS

1:10 PM ET

June 26, 2011

Attempt to digress?

AATAYYAB:

No, it is not Islam or Pakistan bashing - quite ironic that you accuse other faiths when no one is accusing of yours. Please do not trivialize the debate.

 

KING SOLOMON

3:10 PM ET

June 26, 2011

The world does not need muddled American thinking

Senator Kerry et al,

The world does not need muddled American thinking. Please watch, read, and think. Even Jemima Khan has a clearer view than you.

Jemima Khan: The things you say sound great, Mr President. So why do you end up disappointing us?

Video and article here:
http://lalqila.wordpress.com/2011/06/26/jemima-khan-the-things-you-say-sound-great-mr-president-so-why-do-you-end-up-disappointing-us/

Regards,

Aurangzeb Khan
lalqila.wordpress.com

 

GALVESTON TEA

4:00 PM ET

June 26, 2011

A new foreign policy

We need a new isolationist foreign policy where we trade and travel and be friends with others but mind our own business and stay out of other countries foreign affairs.

Isolationist means bring the troops home and cut the funding for the 12 embassy's going up in Iraq.
One of which is bigger then the Vatican.

We enjoy this relationship with Canada.
'We should treat every other country just like we do Canada

 

USAMA2

10:59 PM ET

June 26, 2011

Evil American Empire: Primacy in Central Asia

Its not all Americans, its just the Empire perpetrated by the likes of the author of this article.

How could this be true?

Because Senator Kerry has so nicely shifted the focus of the War on Terror on Pakistan and perpetuated the worldview of long term American military intervention in Pakistan and Central Asia being essential, vital, "life or death" for American people and the world.

But while Kerry has propagated this 'Belief', he has conveniently omitted the economic interests of America in Central Asia and how 100s of billions of dollars could be earned by various American firms over the coming decades if American military intervention is sustained in the region.

Pakistan is considered a corridor for transit of Central Asia, namely Caspian Sea basin gas and mineral deposits to the Arabian Sea and down to India where American firms want to use them for building India into a superpower of the coming decades that will rival China.

In order to make Pakistan into a pliant transition point for Central Asia, it must cooperate with American plans to make India into a regional super power and American firms to have free movement in the region, including to develop Pakistan's transportation infrastructure.

And such a future would make American financial industry quite happy, as they would stand to make billions in bonuses on investing on such. and Kerry is simply thinking of America's interests.

 

AFGHANGOOD

3:19 AM ET

June 27, 2011

Sustainability?!?!

Two things are SERIOUS gaps in this piece by the good Senator and the current strategy pursued by our government and ISAF to stabilize Afghanistan, first off…

“…We need to rethink how best to build and sustain the Afghan army and police in order to leave behind an effective, targeted security force -- not 350,000 unpaid, armed, and angry soldiers…”
There is no way, no how in this world that Afghanistan will be able to sustain and support the military apparatus we are currently constructing for them in Afghanistan. They won’t be able to afford to PAY the soldiers, let one man, train, and equip this force to meet the needs of a professional force. The only solution will be continued US aid at a cost of $10 billion/year, and with the level of corruption and immature system, a large percentage will likely still not get paid.

Secondly,

“…Karzai must do his part, too. This means putting the Afghan economy on track by supporting International Monetary Fund negotiations to develop acceptable banking standards, achieving financial stability, and resolving the Kabul Bank crisis; restoring legitimacy to parliament by overturning the special elections tribunal, which is trying to throw out the results of last year's parliamentary elections; and taking firm steps to combat the predatory corruption that alienates the Afghan people from their government…”
With what resources or plan? Afghanistan doesn’t have a easily assessable natural resources, and those trillions of dollars of precious stones is extremely difficult to get to physically, not to mention that you would have hill tribesman expecting a serious percentage of the take, thereby funding potential insurgents. Agriculture is the other big one…we hear all the time about how Afghanistan use to be the breadbasket of central Asia…nonsense! I’m not saying Afghanistan doesn’t have the potential to produce food at a surplus rate (although you wouldn’t be able to tell by how freaking dry this place is!), what I’m saying is that Afghanistan totally lacking the industrial capacity for this role. Do people think Pakistan, Iran of the northern Republics are going to let their organic agro-business suffer for Afghanistan’s benefit? Stupidity, pure and simple…No, Afghanistan will likely be a narco-state.

The reality is that Afghanistan is simply what it is…a land, like Somali, that is likely to remain unstable and unsettled for a very long time.

 

DAIVA66

2:22 AM ET

July 1, 2011

The overwhelming majority

The overwhelming majority voice their objections to what they see as one-sided support in favor of Israel and against Palestinian rights, and the longstanding, even increasing support for what Muslims collectively see as tyrannies, most notably Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Pakistan, and the Gulf states . Seo Paslaugos The Afghan war was carried into Pakistan by the failure of Pakistan to contain it at the border, not because of US failure of policy to contain the insurgency in Afghanistan. There is also the assumption that removal of ISAF will cause things to "cool down". No sooner than Americans began to leave Iraq did Tunisia, Egypt and Libya explode; where that will stop is anybody's guess.