Trouble in Pakistan's Heartland

Faisalabad, the industrial hub of Punjab, is ailing -- badly. And militant groups are reaping the benefits.

BY UMER FAROOQ | JUNE 28, 2011

FAISALABAD, Pakistan — Standing in the corner of his large factory, textile magnate Mian Aftab Ahmed pondered the future. "I am completely helpless and hopeless," he said.

His giant textile machines produce a deafening noise when in full swing, but Ahmed spoke amid pin-drop silence. Since 2007, when Faisalabad started facing crippling shortages of electricity and natural gas, his factory has been running at 35 to 40 percent of its capacity.

Ahmed's predicament could well describe the situation across Faisalabad, Pakistan's third-largest city and its industrial hub. The deteriorating economic climate is transforming the city into fertile ground for Islamic extremist movements, and a potential base of terrorist activity in Pakistan's heartland.

Pakistan's growing electricity demands have exceeded what its power grid can supply, resulting in sporadic shortfalls. But the primary reason for the power outages is not only lack of capacity, but the government's inability to make payments to private power producers. The aging electricity distribution system, which breaks down frequently, also aggravates the situation further.

The official statistics tell a grim story. According to the Faisalabad Chamber of Commerce and Industry (FCCI), the city's industrial sector has seen a 50 percent reduction in its production capacity. The district office of the Enterprise and Investment Department estimates that the energy crisis has forced more than 300 textile factories to shut down. Industrialists and labor leaders, however, believe the department is underreporting the number of closed-down factories. Sheikh Abdul Qayyum, a former FCCI president, said that at least 600 textile factories in the city shut down for at least three days every week due to the disruption in the natural gas supply.

Industrialists, however, are loath to go on the record to discuss how Faisalabad's deteriorating economic conditions are helping extremist and sectarian groups. "I will only speak about street crimes and the negative impact they are having on the business environment," said Ahmed. The city's businessmen enjoy seeing their names placed next to those of religious and sect leaders on the banners that adorn the city's main markets. Any kind of relationship with sect leaders, who sometimes appear more powerful than the state itself, is seen as a source of security in Faisalabad's unstable social environment.

As industrial activity in Faisalabad comes to a gradual halt, unruly public protests are becoming the new normal. Slogan-chanting, window-smashing crowds have taken to the streets in recent months to protest the lack of jobs. A protest in early March continued for a week and on some occasions turned violent, with workers burning down the office of the power utility company and attacking a local bank. The incident was similar to the January 2009 electricity protests in the city, when industrial workers, traders, and even some small-mill owners brought life to a standstill for three days.

Faisalabad, the backbone of Pakistan's textile industry, is home to hundreds of large-scale and medium-sized businesses, as well as a cottage industry of 60,000 power looms. Conservative estimates from labor organizations and industrialists suggest that the industry provides jobs to more than 2 million skilled and unskilled people. But over the past three years, the city's businesses have suffered at least a 20 to 25 percent increase in the cost of production.

"I don't think I will be able to sustain the production process at the present cost until coming December," said Sheikh Saeed, a leading producer of cotton cloth. He says his factory is on the brink of closure while at least five other factories located next to his have already closed down. "We are thinking of shifting to trading."

An industrialist of Saeed's financial standing has the means to shift to another profession. But no easy alternatives are available for the workers he employs. Mian Abdul Qayyum, a labor leader who runs the Labour Qaumi Movement, a local organization comprising textile workers, claimed that more than 100,000 industrial workers in Faisalabad have already lost their jobs during the last two years.

Daniel Berehulak/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS:
 

Umer Farooq is a journalist based in Islamabad. He specializes in writing on political and security issues.

GOLDENMIDDLE

2:53 AM ET

June 29, 2011

Rebellion

If you have followed the stance of Pakistani elites here is the summary:

1) ZA Bhutto, ex-Prime Minister: We will develop nuclear weapons even if we have to eat grass.
2) Kayani current Army Chief: We prefer dignity over prosperity.

So instead of a rebellion, expect an attack on India such as Kargil (direct) or Mumbai (indirect). That should keep Pakistan united for another decade.

 

OMARALI50

2:50 PM ET

June 29, 2011

Tangential to the above

Tangential to the above discussion, but somehow relevant: The problem in writing about Pakistan (for pakistanis) is that for very complicated reasons, we have arrived where we have arrived. And there are NO good options any more. Reasonable nice liberal people are not good at choosing between very bad options.
For example, I think that IF the US "neocolonial", interventionist, militarist etc etc project in Afghanistan FAILS, Afghanistan will see a worsening civil war for many years to come, with terrible blowback for Pakistan as well. What option to pick between working WITH the CIA or going for a bigger and more violent mess in the aftermath? No good choices. Especially for a well meaning liberal with a Western education and its attendant prejudices.
If Pakistan survives the American withdrawal from Afghanistan, it will be because it has made relative peace with India and given up on its "stategic depth" fantasies and it will then be fighting residual jihadi terrorists for at least ten years, probably longer. If Pakistan opts for accomodation with jihad and pro-taliban intervention in Afghanistan and more zero-sum competition with India (these tend to go together)...and with Iran (even though nobody in Pakistan really WANTS to fight Iran)since our Jihadi brothers are true believers and no calculation will induce them to stop killing shias.. then it may end up in regional war and may not survive intact. In that case, mohajirs may opt for a poor man’s Hong Kong under Indian protection. The fate of the rest is hard to predict. I hope the second scenario does not come about and I do think its chances are less than 50%, but its not out of the question. No good choices.
In such circumstances, what is a liberal pakistani to do? I think they should be expected to be all over the place. And to swing wildly from one position to another, adopting and discarding contradictory opinions, trying to have their cake and eat it too, accepting various theses but not their logical consequences. Then changing their opinion under duress. Probably no human population can do better once things have reached this pass.
Prevention would have been better than cure. But Jinnahbhoy was not too far sighted or deep thinking to begin with, and its been downhill after him, so here we are...between the devil and the deep blue sea.

 

MARTY MARTEL

3:45 PM ET

June 29, 2011

Terrorist State of Pakistan

When it comes to terrorism in Pakistan, Pakistan has invited jihadi violence upon itself. Pakistan is suffering from self-inflicted wounds.

Gen. Zia planted the Islamist poison seed and the tree from that seed is now bearing the toxic fruit. The Army and the ISI and even the civilian democratic leaders will ensure that Pakistan never gives up terrorism as a state policy to blackmail enemies and allies alike. Terrorism has yielded such handsome dividends to Pakistan in the form of international aid. Terrorism has become a second nature to Pakistan, so to speak.

It was Gen. Zia who ushered in a new era of Islamic fundamentalism, bigotry and blasphemy laws in Pakistan targeting minorities, together with nurturing radical, armed Islamic groups, bent on waging jihad across the world. Officers recruited in his era are today three-star Generals and the Pakistani Military is largely motivated by the ideology of the “Quranic Concept of War” articulated by Zia’s protégé Brigadier (later Major General) SK Malik. Describing anyone who stands in the way of jihad as an “aggressor”, Malik held that “the aggressor is always met and destroyed in his own country”.

The malaise of Islamic radicalism runs deep across Pakistan’s entire establishment - civilian and military as well as society.

Lawyers showered the suspected killer of a prominent Pakistani governor with rose petals when he arrived at court and an influential Muslim scholars group praised the assassination of the governor who was recommending to reform Pakistan‘s sharia laws.

The Pakistani parliament’s joint session convened on 5/13/11 after Osama’s killing and ended after adopting a unanimous resolution condemning the American raid on the Abbottabad compound in which al Qaeda chief Osama bin Laden was killed.

Pakistani parliamentarians did not appear to be bothered about Osama living in Abbottabad for the past five years and perhaps in other parts of the country since 9/11.

Osama bin Laden was a hero in Pakistan even prior to his death and remains one now as well.

Nobody forced Pakistani government to facilitate relocation of Osama bin Laden from Sudan to Afghanistan in 1996. Democratic government of Pakistan chose to do so of its own free will.

Nobody forced Pakistani Army and Intelligence to create what ex-CIA official Bruce Reidel called ‘this jihadist Frankenstein’ monster in 1990s. Pakistani Army and Intelligence chose to do so with the full financing provided by Pakistan’s democratic governments at the time.

US ambassador Anne Patterson to Pakistan, wrote in a secret review in 2009 that ‘Pakistan's Army and ISI are covertly SPONSORING four militant groups - Haqqani‘s HQN, Mullah Omar‘s QST, Al Qaeda and LeT - and will not abandon them for any amount of US money‘, as diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks show.

Now how can Pakistan feel threatened by ‘those domestically ensconced terrorist groups’ if Pakistani Army and ISI will NOT abandon them for any amount of US money as reported by ambassador Patterson?

 

OMARALI50

4:32 PM ET

June 29, 2011

They may not FEEL threatened,

They may not FEEL threatened, but they ARE threatened. These are not the sharpest knives in the drawer. GHQ may think their problems are over once the infidels leave (preferrably with the last few hanging from rope ladders trailing below helicopters as they take off from the US embassy in Kabul....that iconic image is unlikely in my amateur opinion, but who can stop people from dreaming?) but that they THINK their problems will be over does not mean their problems really WILL be over.
I think their problems will really begin IF they succeed.

 

JOEYFOTO.FR

7:59 PM ET

June 29, 2011

The Implosion of a Failed State...jt

State Department Advisory Notice to Anyone in Pakistan with a120 IQ or higher.

Get Out Now.

Do not attempt to save this sinking ship; save your children, let the ship sink....
Leave Now

 

ASHLEYRMS22

12:56 AM ET

June 30, 2011

U have no clue Anca about

U have no clue Anca about this region. Unless you have been there , don't believe the one sided media. Afghanistan is not even close to Pakistan and is worse off they have no infrastructure or etc. Dog

 

REHMAN ATA TUNG

12:29 PM ET

July 1, 2011

EXCEPT FOR THE CITIES MCH OF

EXCEPT FOR THE CITIES MCH OF INDIA IS WITHOUT POWER!!85 PERCENT OF POPULATION IN INDIA LIVES BELOW 2 DOLLARS A DAY THAT IS MUCH WORSE THAN SUBSAHARAN AFRICA!!!!PAKKISTAN IS A HAVEN AS COMPARED TO INDIA

 

CHANGS

1:54 AM ET

July 9, 2011

I hope Pakistan does not attack India

I certainly hope Pakistan does not attack India to take it's people's minds off the internal problems of Pakistan.

But I fear that may happen if the Pakistani government or the military start to lose their grip on power.

Unfortunately there isn't much the US government can do about this situation. We no longer have the money to pour into the country trying to buy them off and we don't have much influence with any of their leaders.

Nor can we trust them as they continue to play both sides of the game against us.

Chang S

 

POLITICALAGENDA

8:04 PM ET

July 24, 2011

Who really contols Pakistan?

The Pakistan authorities seems unable to prevent increasing radicalisation of its populace by Islamic elements and is increasingly seems to want to appease them . And can you blame the populace as they have to cope with grinding poverty combined with gross corruption on an industrial scale? Easy meat for radical clerics. However it makes a nasty cocktail for the West to have to sip from and sip we must if we are ever to create a stable Afghanistan

 

LALOPARSAD

7:19 AM ET

July 25, 2011

I think that IF the US

I think that IF the US "neocolonial", interventionist, militarist etc etc project in Afghanistan FAILS, Afghanistan will see a worsening civil war for many years to come, with terrible blowback for Pakistan as well waystoearnmoneyonline. What option to pick between working WITH the CIA or going for a bigger and more violent mess in the aftermath? No good choices. Especially for a well meaning liberal with a Western education and its attendant prejudices.

 

BSPOLICY

11:07 PM ET

July 25, 2011

Stuck between a rock and a hard place

Pakistan seems to be stuck between a rock and a hard place. On one hand you have to keep Islamic pressure groups happy and on the other hand the US happy. A tough act for anyone. Of course it would be helpful if the government and political parties were not so hopelessly corrupt so they could deliver rising living standards but that is not going to stop anytime soon. Who would have thought endemic corruption was going to be such a drag on progress in that area of the world? Very hard to stop too.