The 2012 Horse Whisperers

Who's giving foreign-policy advice to the crop of GOP front-runners?

BY JOSH ROGIN | JULY 5, 2011

Michele Bachmann: The Tea Party's new hawk

Despite all of Bachmann's Tea Party credentials, she's not looking like an isolationist when it comes to foreign policy. Quite the opposite, Bachmann is increasingly vocal in her role as the Tea Party's hawk, pushing the movement back toward the policies of military-based interventionism.

For now, Bachmann is filling the space within the Tea Party left vacant by its former mother hawk, Sarah Palin. The former Alaska governor -- who has not yet made her intentions clear as to the 2012 race -- was once advised by neoconservative foreign-policy consultant Randy Scheunemann, but she has now switched her stance and her advisory team. Her foreign-policy positions are now crafted by Peter Schweizer, a Hoover Institution fellow who blogs for Andrew Breitbart's website Big Peace.

As of now, it's unclear how far Palin's foreign-policy shift will take her. But as the prospect of her presidential candidacy dwindles, it matters increasingly less. Bachmann, meanwhile, in a marked and seemingly calculated way, has come out forcefully seeking to separate out national security from the Tea Party's cost-cutting, budget-slashing, government-shrinking agenda.

In a June 28 interview with NPR, Bachman criticized Obama's announcement to draw down troops in Afghanistan, accused the president of placing political considerations ahead of national security, and implored the president to follow the advice of outgoing International Security Assistance Force commander Gen. David Petraeus, who recommended a slow pace of withdrawal.

"Gen. Petraeus, who's in charge of winning the war effort in Afghanistan, understands that we need to win the war on terror. We must never forget that 9/11 was hatched in the caves and the mountains of Afghanistan. The Taliban has a presence there. Al Qaeda has a presence there. We must defeat them in their backyard. And it's important that Gen. Petraeus and [Lt.] Gen. [John] Allen have the resources that they need to be successful in southern Afghanistan and then also in eastern Afghanistan," she said.

If that sounds extremely close to the position of the leading GOP hawk senators, such as McCain, that's because it is. In fact, Bachmann met with McCain in late June to discuss national security issues and Afghanistan, according to two sources familiar with the meeting. That's not to say she is taking his advice directly, but she is seeking his counsel.

"People assume that Bachmann is a[n] isolationist, but she's not. She's actually pretty hawkish," said one GOP consultant who is working with another candidate and did not wish to be named.

Bachmann did not vote to authorize the war in Libya; she also did not vote to cut off most funding for the mission there, breaking with her own party leadership. Bachmann's stance on Libya isn't as supportive of the mission as McCain's, but it represents the deep frustration throughout Congress with the president's handling of the mission, the consultant said.

"Obama's bungling of the Libya war has made it almost impossible for Republicans to support him even as they continue to support his even less bungled Afghanistan strategy," the consultant said.

In an interview, McCain noted that the GOP candidates aren't straying too far from the party's traditional stance on national security. The death of the hawkish GOP has been exaggerated, McCain said.

"That's the same thing [that] was said in 2007, when a majority of the Senate wanted to withdraw from Iraq. In the end, it's not a matter of the influence of one senator or one wing of the party; it's a matter of principle and a matter of national security."

(Bachmann's campaign did not respond to requests for information about her in-house foreign-policy advisors.)

Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

 

Josh Rogin writes The Cable blog for ForeignPolicy.com.

ROMAN TILES

8:53 PM ET

July 5, 2011

First Two Comments

What is with the advertising comments? It isn't even political or news related! Unless it's where Michelle Bachmann and Sarah Palin shop lol C:

 

ROMAN TILES

10:28 PM ET

July 5, 2011

?

Where did their comments go? I am confused now...

 

WHATGREATIS

1:49 AM ET

July 6, 2011

Huntsman

I really hope he becomes the GOP candidate.

 

PAPICEK

10:16 AM ET

July 7, 2011

this is rich...

"three main candidates who are all advocating increased military spending"

When we already spend as much as the rest of the world put together.

I'm rather sorry that I read this article, as I expect no more than political positioning, and I wasn't disappointed. Bacevich is right. I've been right all along. A sane, realistic discussion on policy isn't possible.

 

MLABRECHE

10:17 AM ET

July 7, 2011

What about Ron Paul?

Ron Paul, the only real conservative Republican in the race who advocates a humble foreign policy. Isn't that worth talking about?!

 

ITONLYSTANDSTOREASON

2:22 PM ET

July 7, 2011

Stuck in the Past

Other than Huntsman, these candidates all are stuck in the mindset of good guys vs bad guys, finding an enemy and fighting, rather than finding a competitor or opponent and figuring out how to modify their behavior in support of our national interests.

A problem they face is that Obama is pretty hawkish himself. The only way to get to his right is to promise the contradictory (boosting the economy while diverting more wealth to an over-extended military) and the foolish (enabling more bad behavior by Israel).

I hope someone will call these warriors for democracy on their pretensions. What would they have done about Mubarak? Should the Saudi monarchy come or go? How many years more should we be willing to fight in Afghanistan?

 

AUKPERSPECTIVE

3:11 PM ET

July 7, 2011

What is it with Republican / Tea Party women candidates

I am coming from this from a UK perspective so please forgive my lack of knowledge on US current affairs.

The impression we get in the UK is that you have these very grey Republican men but these amazingly spunky Republican women each with more personality than all the male candidates put together. Plus they do really risky things like drive across the States with bikers. I mean that just could not happen in the UK.

We also do not have a grass roots movement like the Tea Party if fact no European country has. All the folksy religous stuff seems strange too. But most strange of all is that they actually sem to really believe what they are saying which is sort of invigorating.

Of course in could just be a PR trick you coud learn at any marketing corporate event of the Mr(s) Smith Goes to Washington sort of but if so it comes across really convincingly at least in the UK.

Might be different upclose

 

BENJAMINFRANKLIN

4:14 PM ET

July 7, 2011

Political pandering

Republican candidates' foreign policy consists of deciding what the voters want, and then pandering to it. Their problem is figuring out what the voters want. You can be sure that if one of them ends up in power, Israel and the military industrial complex, described by President Eisenhower, will be well taken care of, no matter what the candidate campaigned on.