I find some of the assertions in this article staggeringly amazing. A good attempt has been made in the article playing on the fears the west is familiar with. It is a good attempt becasue the arguments have been constructed logically, that's all.

But who is the writer trying to fool? Obviously the article is meant for western audience who have been fooled by thier own 'democratic' governemtns anyway creating similar fears in the mind of their masses.

There is good reason why India is poking its nose in Afghanistan and it is not the reason Sumit would have you believe.He is one of diehard anti-Pakistan Indian journalists.

The article is full of DOUBLE SPEAK and is attemting hide nefarious Indian designs of casuing bloodhsed and destruction in Afghnaistan and Paksitan. it will also open another front with Pakistan. The AfPak border is difficult to monitor and control as the American and Nato have discovered easy to send in Indian terrorists into Pakistan and casue mayhem. That is why Pakistan is against Indian having a foothold in its back-yard.

But do the western governments care? NO. Western policies are important, the lives of non-white non-western peoples are not important. We undertand that quite clearly even if the people in the west do not.

I could go on .........but suffice to say that India has just begun is media and diplomatic campaign to create reasons for America to allow India a role in Afghanistan before US troops start to leave. IT WILL FAIL.

With US ready to wash its hands off Afghanistan, it is only a matter of time that Taliban rule will be imposed by Pakistan on Afghanistan.

Next in line is president Karzai’s head for Pakistan-controlled Taliban.

Disarray will ensue the death of Hamid Karzai that Pakistan will exploit to the fullest while Manmohan’s India will stand idly by.

Manmohan’s PEACEFUL India is in NO position to prevent Pakistani takeover. Pakistan will have its strategic depth against India so that then it can turn its full attention to terrorize India while Sonia-Singh government continues to minimize the impact of Pakistan-sponsored terrorist activities in India as it did in latest Mumbai terror attacks.

if you are shamed to buy sex toys from real sex shop,pls come to sex shop online http://www.tomsextoyshop.com

Let us be pragmatic about this. There people posting here who clearly believe Pakistan to be evil incarnate and those who believe India to be. Both countries have a lot to gain from "controlling" Afghanistan, the most obvious of those is that the two countries are still at war. Because of a massive advantage India has both in terms of it armed forces (equipment and size) and nuclear arsenal, Pakistan has had to resort to what asymetrical warfare through proxy organisations. There evidence to support this is myriad, can we not have national pride get in the way of the facts.

The likelihood of India using Afghanistan as a second front is slim, as is that of sending Indian "terrorists" across the border. If think Pakistan has enough trouble with militants in the FATA/NWFP for India to need to do that.

The biggest gain which has been set out in this article is that of economic gain, the Indian economy is growing at speed. China too had invested great sums in Afghanistan and in Pakistan.

The stability of the Pakistani state is actually of great importance to India, maintaining a status quo avoids conflict which would harm economic growth in India and could after all lead to nuclear war, one which India would win but at a great cost.

Thank you, we needed someone to come in and put things back on track where they should be. This is just like Pakistan asking the US to come in and mediate over Kashmir but India refuses.

I will have to disagree with you on several points. Firslty though, and it needs to be said, for the west India is like a 'new kid on the block'. West is looking at India with a monocle (a state to use against China, therefore giving it all the help it needs to strengthen it regional power). What the west needs is a bifocul lense. Pakistanis here can provide that part becuase Pakistanis live next door and know much more about HINDUSTAN as they like to call in India in private (India='secular' to fool the public, Hindustan=fundamentalist hindu state) than those in the west.

Based on Pakistan's experience with HINDUSTAN since 1947 we know for a fact that what mischief they can get up to and have got up to in the past and now. We are gong by experience whilst, and I say this with all due respect, you are going by what you read in the Indian media.

There are plenty of what I call 'ARMCHAIR' critics in the world. Some of them mean well but that is not enough.

We know for a fact that India will and laready has put its terrorists across the border. The fact that west cannot see it is becasue it does not want to, yet.

All text books and artciles will tell you that stability of Pakistan is important for India. The truth as always lies elsewhere. At every ecnonomic forum India opposes Pakistan. I can gice you plenty of examples, this is what I mean when I say Pakistanis here can provide the other part of the lense for you to clealry see the real face of India and stop beleiveing in the DOUBLESPEAK that Indian journalists and writers ahve learnt from their western counterparts.

Clinton on her visit to India yesterday:
“As India takes on a larger role throughout the Asia-Pacific, it is also taking on new responsibilities including the duty to speak out against violations of universal human rights,” she said.

You see we don't do doublespeak we tell it staright as it is, the truth.

Now does this woamn really care about human rights? If she did she would be telling the Indian to sort out Kashnir where these Hindustani soldiers are raping, murdering, inncoent civilians and all becasue the Kashmiri asre asking to allow them the right given under the UN resolution to decide if they want to be with India, pakistan or independent.

Yes UN RESOLUTION GIVES KASHMIRIS THE RIGHT TO DEMAN IT. HINDUSTAN HAS Denied them this right since for the last 60 years. Those who speak up are killed, their women raped.

You want statics Ican give you statistics.

So if this woman cared about UN resolutions she would push India to allow Kashmiris this right. Going by its past record it shuold put sanctions on India and cluster bomb it using depleted uranium as it does to Muslim countires.

So don't give us your outdated, far-from-reality analysis. we know and see what is going on. We are not ARMCHAIR analysts. Our people are at the receiving end of the cluster bombs and dpeleted uranium. We see things as they are not as you want us see.

...somone talking some sense. You see that is all that is needed to hold a mature dialogue.

Pakistanis are a misunderstood nation and its not their fault. The quagmire that they are in is not of their making. They are accused of being fundamentalists. They are not. If the west says, so everyone beleives it.

They are accused of hating India and their policies being India-centric. They do not, but yes the polcies are India-centric, they have to be. Its India and the west that says, so everyone beleives it.

The fault lies not with the Pakistanis but with the PR and perception managment industry that earns billions for deceiving the public to further the murderous policies of the western governments. Indan media has begun to use the same kind of language.

The fault lies with the leaders of the western world and the interests of the multinationals they represent. They are an unscupulous lot rather than admiting defeat they will experiment with new strategies killing yet more people, destroying yet more properties, shattering yet more lives. We suffer. Our relatives are used as live targets for testing the latest western weaponary and when we speak up we get called terroists.

The fault lies with the 'armrchair' analysts of western think tanks of the type who produce Clash of Civilisations and other works similar concept.

You yourself sir are guilty of using doublespeak. Why use the word 'asymeteric' when you mean terrorism.

Yes you are probably begining to think, this guy is blaming eveyone-else accept his own lot, just typical.

Noone has ever asked us our opinion. On rare occassion when we are asked our views are distorted. Ask us direct questions we are not the type to employ doublespeak. We tell you exactly what we mean. If you want proof, you only need to read our newspapers to see how critical they are of Pakistani society. How critical they are of the rape laws you mentioned and other ills in society (every socity has its fair share of it).

I tell you no-one pours more criticism on Pakistan and Pakistanis than the Pakistanis themselves. We identify the ills but we haven't got the leadership who will help us sort those ills.

I ask you, in you heart of hearts, do you really believe politicians (any) tend to tell the truth nothing but the truth. Yet when the tell you lies about us why do you beleive them?

Pakistan has bent over backwards to have friendly relations with Pakistan. Throughout history of Indo-Pak relations Pakistan has alway been the first to extend its hand of friendship. Its never been reciprocated. Yet reading the Indian and western media you would, if you didn't know any better, begin to beleive in 'Incredible India' India is incredible.

Real history sir lies not in the text books oe wikipwedia but in the hearts of your victims. Search their hearts for once, please.

Sumit Ganguly has Hindustani roots. He has time and again blasted Pakistan in International media. That is what he is paid for, but one needs to ask; Why does a so-called neutral and influential magazine with close contacts with USA State Department would let such an openly bigoted and anti-Pakistan journalist use this prominent platform? The answer itself lies in MR. Gangulay’s statements and American government’s recent action and proclamations about Pakistan.
Striver has very rightly pointed out the facts, which some commentators – like Dr. Kuchbi & Marty Martel refuse to accept, but such mindset clearly indicate ignorance and lack of understanding of international geo-political realities.
For such people, let me give two examples of Hindustan’s democracy and to put things in perspective. Stephen Moss from Guardian interviewed Arundhati Roy ( 5 June 2011) and talked with her new book; “Broken Republic”. Here is what she tells: “ My home has been pelted with stones; the Indian launch of Broken Republic was interrupted by pro-government demonstrators who stormed the stage; I may be charged with sedition for saying that Kashmiris should be given the right of self-determination. They are trying to keep me destabilised. Anybody who says anything is in danger. Hundreds of people are in jail."
Coming to India/USA versus Pakistan, the relationship between Pakistan and USA has never been about trust. It was and is a strategic alliance founded on complementary interests. Pakistan wants military assistance and the USA needs for regional support in the Afghanistan war. You cannot buy the loyalty of the second largest Muslim country in the world and an atomic power to top it.
Recently, I read an interesting yet very disturbing article; “Imperial Eye on Pakistan”, by Andrew Gavin Marshall in Global Research, May 28, 2011; He pointed out that “America has, in recent years, altered its strategy in Pakistan in the direction of destabilization. In short, Pakistan is an American target. The reason: Pakistan’s growing military and strategic ties to China, America’s primary global strategic rival”.
USA Think Tanks, government officials and CIA has often accused Pakistan to be too India fixed and have advised, even cajoled Pakistan to shift its forces from Indian border to the Afghan/ Pakistan front to fight America’s losing war on terrorism.
These anti-Pakistan lobbies often present India as a peace loving country, which has no designs against and ill will towards Pakistan. These self styled pundits as well as pro-Indian lobby in Pakistan should be ashamed of such a behavior and now think deep and hard about such a misguided discourse. Here is why?

A report by the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (Sipri) says that India accounted for 9% of all global weapons imports between 2006 and 2010. The study also shows that India has overtaken China to become the world's largest importer of arms. As it was not enough, the report predicts that India will continue to be to the leading arms importer in the coming future, the report adds.
India’s present defense budget is a whopping $32.5bn and it is looking to spend more than $50 bn over the next five years to modernize its armed forces, including a $10 bn deal to buy 126 new fighter jets. Last October, India announced that it would buy 250 to 300 advanced fifth-generation stealth fighter jets from Russia over the next 10 years. The deal, which could be worth up to $30 bn, is believed to be the largest in India's military history. Now it has decided to buy even more hardware by short-listing two European fighters and ruled out two US rivals for a key $11 bn military contract. (BBC News. 28 April 2011)
It is said by the western experts that India's increased spending on arms comes amid rising concerns about China's growing power, and its traditional rivalry with neighboring Pakistan, with which is has fought three wars.
Well, we all know that India with all its weapons is no match to China. The billion-dollar question then remains: Where would all these expensive and latest jetfighters be used. Not in Himalaya Mountains or in dogfights over Tibet.
Naturally, all this hardware would be used against Pakistan to fulfill the old Hindustani dream of Nehru, who during the partition time very arrogantly remarked; “Let them have their Pakistan. It will come crawling back to Mother India in six months.”

You say: The problem is with legislation.

I say: Problem is not with the legislation but the way it is used and the purpose behind it. A good legislation can be abused by rogue elements in society to persecute minorities but you don't need legislation for it.You do not need blashemy laws for that. Atrocities of RSS agaisnt Msulims Christians and Sikhs prove my point. I am sure you are well aware of their atrocities.

You are aware I guess that:

RSS believes that only Hindus should reside within India, the minorities should either come into the Hindu fold or be wiped out. The organisation wish to create a Hindu Super State of Hindutva, Hindu, Hindi and Hindustan. There is no place for minorities.

The RSS have actively been trying to distort and destroy Sikh history and practises by modifying the history and books.

I am not agaisnt blashmey laws. But they need to be strong so that no one can abuse them. If there are blasphemy laws for Msulims In Pakistan than Paksitani Christians amd Hindus must also be protected. Despite these blahemy laws minorities have a much more peaceful existence in Pakistan than those in India.

Showreing of petals is not a symbol of extremism. One group group which supports the law is showing its appreciation. They have a right to support it. Just as you have a right to support laws that are used to persecute Muslim minorites like 'Terrorism Acts' springing up everywhere after 9/11. These are not blaephemy laws but are abused nonetheless and Msulim minorites are at the receiving end of it.

You say: You are not ready to believe Kashmiri Pandits were driven out of Kashmir. The Chabad House was not attacked by LET.

I say: There is no evidence to support your claim but there is a lot of evidence of Indian government enouraging the Pundits to move. Similarly there is evidence that LET attacked ChabadHouse.

Yu say: These are the facts, you can deny these facts at your own loss.
If you are denying it, there is no point in debate

I say: I do not take 'facts' at their face value. I do not readily accept 'facts' presneted in (any) media.
So if I don't agree with you there is no point in holding debate. Well sir what kind of logic is that? If I agree with on all yur 'facts' there is nothing left to debate about, any person with a bit of balanced mind will agree with me.

You say: The Durand Line is a temporary line and it doesn't even exist. This is pretty hilarious.

I say: thisis slight distortion of what I said. Not your fault ut lets just say 'lost in translation'. Durand Line should be removed altogether. Paksitan and Afghanmistan are conjoined twins. They are located so strategically that together if they concentrate on their economies without borders (Pakistani currency is used inseveral parts of Afghanistan) they can become the hub of international trade. That is a theory for now but will be put into practice in good time. It is inevitable.

You say: You are not a failure unless you blame some one for your loss. Pakistan is blaming India for it being a failed state

I say: This is another figment of your imagniation. No one and no one blames India for the state paksitan is in. India has got the capability. And no Paksitan is not a failed state. Just becasue west says it you believe it.

Your tunnel vision is your loss sir.

The sad reality is that Pakistan, due to chain actions by galaxy of illiterate rulers have been turned in to a problem for the world at large.

Making an important remark at the end of his book, Who Killed Daniel Pearl?, the French philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy expressed this terrifying conclusion: “I assert that Pakistan is the biggest rogue of all the rogue states today. I assert that what is taking form there, between Islamabad and Karachi, is a black hole compared to which Saddam Hussein’s Baghdad was an obsolete dump.”

Pakistan has earned distinction of being a unique country, since its birth pursuing amazing adherence to self destructive goals and objectives. Instead of working for the betterment of its people and peaceful coexistence, it pumped its scares resources to gobble up Kashmir along with activation of so called concept of strategic depth in Central Asia and beyond.

Let us try to go over the defining historical events in Kashmir, to judge the validity and fairness of convenient Kashmir harangue , their world view and vision or lack of it.

In August 1947, like other princely states, Kashmir also had the choice to accede to its preferred dominion - India or Pakistan, taking into account factors such as geographical contiguity and the wishes of their people.

The King of Kashmir delayed his decision, attempting to remain independent.

In their very first major foreign policy decision, the rulers of Pakistan decided to attack and take Kashmir by force. The Pakistani soldiers in the guise of tribal Pathans and mercenaries entered Kashmir on 20th October 1947.

When invaders reached outskirts of the capital Srinagar, the Maharaja had to ask India for help and finally joined India on 26th October 1947.

The agreement which acceded Jammu and Kashmir to India was signed by the Maharaja and Lord Mountbatten of Burma. The Jammu & Kashmir National Conference volunteers worked shoulder-to-shoulder with the Indian Army to drive out the invaders.

Pundit Nehru’s deep faith in effectiveness of UN, forced him to seek help of the international body in no way diluted the facts of Kashmir being part of India.

Pakistan never retreated from the forcibly occupied area, the basic precondition of the plebiscite, which could never be held. While article 370 forbids any one to buy property in Kashmir, Pakistan changed the demography of the part under its occupation, rendering possibility of a plebiscite remote.

After 1989 departure of the Russians from Afghanistan, the Pakistan army/ISI decided to push the battle hardened Jihadists in to Kashmir. That led to sharp revival of separatist forces and religious fanaticism.

Till 2001 terrorist groups in Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) have killed more than 30,000 civilians and 6000 defense personnel. The political parties have not been spared either. The National Conference has lost 205 members, Congress 49, Janta Dal 10, BJP 9, CPI (M) 5 and the Awami League 5. More than 350,000 pundits have been rendered homeless, forcing them to live as refugees in their own country. The terrorists have attacked 45 security forces’ establishments in the last year. Between 1990 and 2000, the security forces have recovered 20,365 AK rifles, 8,825 pistols, 959 UMGs, 308 sniper rifles, 615 rocket launchers, 1,687 rocket boosters, 75 LMGs, 757 assorted weapons and 25,000 kg of RDX.

The rulers of Pakistan have never shied away from their gleeful acceptance of providing support to so called Kashmir freedom fighter.He never mentioned the well-known facts that Pakistan has attacked Kashmir in 1947 which eventually ceded of India, along with further attacks in 1965, 1971 and 1999.

It might have also meant little to many that Pakistan for long, has brazenly given safe sanctuary and ample resources of dozens of terrorists, hate preachers, war lords, drug lords, plane hijackers, criminals, smugglers and killers.

Obviously the teeming masters of factoids, would care about these facts, before twisting facts to blatant sensationalism, deceit to promote stupid self destructive adventurism of Pakistani Army and ISI.

Instead of accepting and learning from past mistakes, even the educated Pakistanis laps in to gleefully quoting variety of Indian problems, which are not unique and common to the region and beyond.
Certainly a country and its society steeped in helpless regressive religious obscurantism insularity and hate for its neighbors along with love of violence can not respond in different way.

The expose of Gulam Fai in USA, is only another example of how Pakistan is only ruled by its Army and sinister ISI, while civil;ion rulers are just card board cut outs to dupe the world.

India is having multiple of problems, but their influence do not reach over borders and stage killing, bomb blasts and attack in Karachi or else where.

How well Pakistan has been able to govern itself, is open for the world to see and react along with its teeming terrorists, wide spread terrorist infrastructure and safe heaven for criminals of the world.

Faced with evidences of terrors plans emanating from with in Pakistanis, jump in to quoting Indian RAW and its sinister plans along with few names.

However they have never been able to prove anything yet, though counter actions and plan from India must have been there and why not?

Talking of spies, even USA and UK have spies in other country for various covert and overt operations.

In spite of the problems India is going ahead, while Pakistan is sadly descending to more conflicts, mayhem, destruction, fanaticism and obscurantism.

Wise Pakistanis must devote their time and other resources to solve the problems with in, instead of lecturing Indians about the issues and complexities they no nothing about.

You do it everytime. You see things that are not there. Sign of old age perhaps? (JOKE)

Never extolled any kind of extremism. But you seem to to assent tacitly in Hindu extremism as a form of lesser evil. Reading between the lines.

The Durand Line does not exist for the Pukhtuns. There are blood relations on either side of the Line which is transgeressed daily. Its like crossing the road to the other.

Sooner rather later the Durand Line will be removed. Indians do not like this but that is there problem and long may they live with that.

Why should I not bring in the Indian angle. Indians are possessed with Pakistan as the forum here and other that I have been on prove. Indian have a love-hate relationship with Paskitan. They love to talk about its ills but hate to talk about its many strengths.

Pakistanis too have an obsession but it is a healthy obsession. They are obssessed with self-criticism to their own detriment.

Indians need to do a lot introspection and self-criticism too. They cannot becasue they are too obssessed with finding faults with Pakistan. Your own faults are slapping you on your face. Yet you choose to ignore them. In this context there is no fool greater than an Indian fool.

I wish I could show the chart here but India is the largest recipient of aid (DFID2009). Indians are in Denial.

Paksitan is 6th down the list. We don't deny our shortcomings.

Here is something else Indians will deny. Indian received in 2011 financial massive aid for education.Britain will spend over $1.5 billion during the next three years in aid to Shining India, a nuclear-armed power that sent a spacecraft to the moon recently, to lift "hundreds of millions of people" out of poverty, the British secretary of state for international development said last November, according to the Guardian newspaper.

ALL I want is you people to be HONEST AND ADMIT YOUR SHORTCOMINGS. It might hurt to be honest initially but then you will get used to it.

BE AN HONEST INDIAN. ADMIT YOUR FAULTS.

Wise Pakistanis are doing that... devoting their time and resources to solve the problems in Pakistan... but at the same time they have to come out and defend themselves when malicious lies are spread around by prejudiced little minds like summit ganguly and the little gang of his poodles ...

And what is wrong with removal of Durand line.. it will simple restore the historical and geographical reality ......

Only ignorant and bigots wish disintegration of Pakistan ... and they have been wanting it for more than half a century... being consumed by their own hatred of Pakistan

Perhaps this forum should only be used for analysing what has been written ..... mr ganguly is worried about ‘that a resurgent Taliban may actually help broker a peace agreement between the Pakistani regime and Pakistani domestic terrorist groups like Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan. That, they argue, could redirect the collective wrath of various jihadi organizations from internecine conflict’....

Some Freudian slip LOL

VISIONTUNNEL in his comments first says: " Pakistani Rulers have created Mess for the World” and then quotes French philosopher Bernard-Henri Levy who expressed this terrifying conclusion: “I assert that Pakistan is the biggest rogue of all the rogue states today. I assert that what is taking form there, between Islamabad and Karachi, is a black hole compared to which Saddam Hussein’s Baghdad was an obsolete dump.”
Would it not be interesting that this commentator tells the readers, which world is he/she referring to? As far as I know, there are nearly 200 countries in the world and Pakistan has excellent relations with all of them except, India, Israel and USA? The second question, one can ask this person of Tunnel Vision is, what problem, you are referring, which Pakistan has made for this imaginary world. Please explain otherwise your argument is nothing but an extension of silly anti-Pakistan propaganda. Debates should be with facts and not pocket philosophy.

As far as Bernard –Henri Levi is concerned; he is one of the biggest anti-Islam intellectuals in the West as well a lackey of USA policy in the Middle East. Because of his close ties to Israeli lobby in USA congress and close relations with President Sarkozy, he is able to say horrible things, which no other western intellectuals does. Read his speeches at fund raising in USA and debates with Tariq Ramadan and you would see, what I mean.

The real reason for his tirade against Pakistan is that Pakistan is the only Muslim country in the World, which is a nuclear power and would be great support for China in the case of Israel-India and USA encirclement designs. It is not a secret that there is a strong Israeli/Indian lobby in the West, which would like nothing, more than disarm Pakistan’s nuclear assets so that the Muslim world is totally defenceless and easy to exploit.

When it comes to Kashmir, Tunnel Vision seems to be either ignorant of the history or he has read too many Indian school textbooks. The main factor of Hindustan’s division was the wish of people first and foremost and not the will of its rulers. The Maharaja of Hari Singh of Kasmir did not consult his people, majority of whom wanted to join Pakistan and under pressure from Nehru – who was a Kashmiri Brahman – illegally delayed the decision and then joined Hindustan.

However when Osman Ali Khan, Asaf Jah VII, 10th Nizam of Hyderabad Deccan wanted to join Pakistan, the state was forcibly annexed by Hindustani armed forces on 17 September 1948. Nawab Mohammad Mahabat Khanji III of Junagadh, a princely state located on the south-western end of Gujarat also chose to accede to Pakistan but Hindustan refused to accept the Nawab's choice of accession and took over the country anyway.

So dear Tunnel Vision, I hope that you have learned a lesson from my history teaching that Hindustan has always practiced double morals and hegemony. It is this arrogant mindset, Pakistanis dislike, otherwise Pakistani and Indian people are perfectly capable of being friends and even brothers and sisters.
I for one believe in it.
Kind regards

It amazing to see some people shamelessly babble that Pakistan will not allow things to go on thee as the Afghans want and desire!

They even forget that it was primarily Pakistani Army/ISI stooge who are responsible for consequence of violence after 1989 departure of Russians.

Abdullah Azzam, the then amir of Jihad, wanted to the fighters to go back and he wanted to go back to Palestine.

That was not accepted to ISI their stooges along with Osama Bin Laden and Jawahri, as they wanted to expand the Jihad and strike at west.

Abdullah Azzam was assassinated in Peshawar by a bomb blast. There were many who might have wanted him dead, but it happened in Pakistan, and many believe it was done by ISI, or by others with its tactic approval.

After departure of Russians from Afghanistan, battle hardened-dehumanized Jihadis were pressed in to Kashmir to foment violence there along with explosion of separatism by supporting and funding Kashmir fanatics like .Geelani, a well known Pakistani stooge and others.

How attempts were made to influence the political opinions and actions by ISI front man in USA, Gulam Fai has come out in open recently.

But at the same time a disease can not cured if the patient is not even ready for a free and fair diagnosis,

Why Pakistani rulers and opinion makers act as they do, has been analyzed and described by Aateesh Taseer, the estranged son of assassinated governor of Punjab, late Mr. Salmaan Taseer.

His article has been published in Wall Street Journal, titled-

"Why My Father Hated India"

Whose who babble on internet that Indians have nothing else to do must read this article.

But the teeming delusional Jingoists are not known to accept facts and realities, as they love to they live in their own private world of million bad dreams, inhabited by dark shadows of well known foreign enemies.

I think that the India have to participate more the questions of war near about your territory. leilão online leilão online contabilidade rj criação de lojas virtuais criação de sites de compras coletivas criação de sites de leilão vidraçaria em são paulo

Pakistan has been a bad ally of the US for at least the last ten years helping the Taliban and even hiding Bin Laden. At last Pakistan is being made to face the music over this. Also continuing acts of friendship to India that began under Clinton has heralded a new eras of security co-operation with India.

Recent events like the signing of the cyber agreement last month are ample evidence of that. Getting closer to India also helps us put pressure on Pakistan. Even Republicans are singing Hilary Clinton's praises for her work here and they are spot on.

In my point of view, Pakistan's other major interest is to promote a friendly regime in Kabul. This is hardly as simple as it sounds.
Afghans are famously proud and prickly about their independence,
and some are still not fully reconciled to Pakistani rule over some 30 million Pashtuns across the border. In fact, Afghanistan has never recognized that border along the Durand Line, drawn by the British raj in 1893 to mark the limits of Afghan rule.

BEST REGARDS:jada fire