Sorry, Pakistan: China Is No Sugar Daddy

Just because Washington and Islamabad are at odds doesn't mean Beijing is looking to step in.

BY URMILA VENUGOPALAN | JULY 21, 2011

When the chips are down, as the saying goes, you quickly learn who your friends are.

With the Obama administration's recent decision to suspend some $800 million in U.S. aid to the Pakistani military, the generals in Rawalpindi are once again turning to their "all-weather" friends in Beijing. Although the White House's action is unlikely to lead to a total cutoff of military assistance, the figure is significant, representing more than one-third of the United States' annual commitment to Pakistan.

Reflecting his government's displeasure at the move, Islamabad's ambassador to Beijing, Masood Khan, pointedly announced that "China will stand by us in difficult times as it has been doing for the past years." His statement was designed to show Washington that Pakistan has other powerful friends. Implicit in Khan's message was also an expectation that Beijing would indeed provide enhanced military, and perhaps other, assistance.

Are Pakistani leaders unduly optimistic about Chinese largesse? Or does Washington's loss of influence provide Beijing an opportunity to deepen its ties with Islamabad?

On the face of it, there are ample historic and strategic reasons for China to increase military aid to Pakistan. After all, Islamabad is Beijing's closest ally in South Asia, and both are keen to limit Indian influence.

Pakistan has also benefited from substantial trade and economic ties with China, particularly in infrastructure and mining. Beijing is Pakistan's largest trading partner, a relationship that was worth almost $9 billion last year.

Military ties have been a key feature of Sino-Pakistani relations; Beijing is now Islamabad's largest defense supplier. China has helped build elements of Pakistan's conventional and nuclear forces. It has participated in joint aircraft manufacturing programs, as well as helped Islamabad acquire tactical ballistic missiles, according to Jane's, and sensitive nuclear technology.

China's worries over its internal security provide a further motivation to bolster Pakistan's stability. Concerns about Islamist militancy on its western border have grown since the 2009 Uighur riots in the Xinjiang autonomous region, which left nearly 200 people dead. Violence once again broke out in the restive region this week, though not on the same scale as two years ago. In the remote town of Hotan, state media claimed that police shot dead 14 rioters, heightening tensions between the central government and the Uighur community.

The Turkistan Islamic Party (TIP), a Uighur separatist group that Beijing often blames for terrorist attacks within China, appears to have a sanctuary in the borderlands of Afghanistan and Pakistan. TIP leaders were killed in South Waziristan and North Waziristan, in September 2003 and February 2010, respectively. Chinese leaders fear that the reduction in U.S. military aid to Pakistan -- coupled with the impending drawdown of American troops from Afghanistan -- could afford the Uighurs a safe haven outside Beijing's control.

Indeed, Afghanistan looms large in China's strategic calculus. Media reports highlighting the discovery of nearly $1 trillion in untapped mineral deposits in Afghanistan surely have piqued Chinese interest in bolstering relations with Kabul. With its export-oriented economy heavily dependent on raw material imports, the prospect of cheap resources on China's periphery is understandably appealing. Acutely aware that Pakistan's generals will play an integral role in Afghanistan's future, Beijing will be keen to leverage its close ties with Rawalpindi.

But only up to a point.

Jason Lee-Pool/Getty Images

 

Urmila Venugopalan is an independent analyst and former Asia editor at Jane's Intelligence Review. She can be reached at urmila.venugopalan@gmail.com or on Twitter @Urmila_V.

RRAFAY

3:36 PM ET

July 21, 2011

Pathetic

What a pathetic article.

Any article about Pakistan-China relations that fails to even mention Gwadar port and the Karakoram Highway is an ignorant article.

Perhaps the author should look into the amount of construction and focus China has put into Kashgar, with the sole aim of connecting it to Gwadar.

Why are mere analysts writing for FP?

 

P.J. AROON

4:21 PM ET

July 21, 2011

Gwadar

If you want to read about the author's take on Gwadar, please check out the article she wrote for FP last month, "Pakistan's Black Pearl":

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/06/03/pakistan_s_black_pearl

 

JIM BOB

4:28 PM ET

July 21, 2011

Another dodgy Indian

What is it with the FP always giving space to Indian propagandists?
Interesting to see Indian paranoia at work though, always attempting to find a way of belittling Pakistan.

 

NIHONSEAN

11:32 AM ET

July 22, 2011

Not Sure What's Dodgy Here

There doesn't seem to be anything in the author's analysis that belittles Pakistan. The fact of the matter is that Pakistan has two options in terms of ally of choice. The author is simply showing that for Pakistan China is not a replacement for the United States, at least not at the moment.

Offering opinion based on fact is called analysis. Discrediting and denoucing opinions you don't like is propaganda.

 

THE DEVIL'S LAPDOG

5:30 PM ET

July 21, 2011

Indian's inferiority complex showing.....again

Having lived in India briefly, I find it not surprising that Indian commentators cannot say anything good about Pakistan. Whether it is the border clashes (always Pakistan's fault), bombings (always done by the big bad ISI), Muslim and Sikh protestors in Kashmir and Punjab (always inspired by Pakistani agents, of course), Indians cannot help but blame their neighbour. This explains why China is so advanced while India relies on outdated call centres! Chinese like to do and Indians like to talk (and blame Pakistan and China).

Pakistan has made some bad decisions in its history, however, the decision to 'gut' relations with the unreliable and bankrupt US and to pick China as its new ally is one that will pay off. China is where the future is in education, manufacturing, engineering, medicine and innnovation. By picking China, Pakistan is on the right side of history: abandonning an old, undependable and declining American empire that India (to its detriment) has sided with!

 

ALEXBC

11:38 PM ET

July 21, 2011

A Lapdog...?

...for China, it appears, rather than the devil.

What you say about India is baldly racist and myopic; plenty of commentators once said the same thing about China, for much of the 19th and 20th centuries. It was the real "sick man" of Asia while Japan became a world power and India was the major outpost of the British Empire.

"China is where the future is in education, manufacturing, engineering, medicine and innnovation."

Not really. China's education system is subpar by almost any metric other than meaningless rote-learning and memorization. Its manufacturing sector is shrinking as countries like Vietnam expand more aggressively into industry, while countries like Mexico and even the US itself are capitalizing on growing reticence toward lengthy supply lines (read: shipping items across the Pacific Ocean while fuel prices are surging). Most engineers trained in China would not qualify as so if measured by the more rigorous standards of the West. China's medical system is decades behind the industrialized world, and none of the high-precision, cutting-edge medical equipment is manufactured in China.

25-30 years from now, when India has a much larger and younger population than China, buttressed by a stronger civil society than China will ever form under its current regime, the joke will be on "lapdogs" like you.

 

VISIONTUNNEL

11:01 AM ET

July 22, 2011

You Must be Kidding or Naive

Dear Davil's Lapdog,

Does you ID represent your acute fascination and appreciation of lunacy, death and destruction?

You are entitle to your opinion and own world of twisted realities.
Ordinary Pakistanis are the helpless prisoners of the dark space created by galaxy of their civilian and military rulers.

If you are not aware of reasons and history of India-Pakistan conflict, please get your self acquainted first, before making comments.

If you do not want to believe what Indians say, read what the present Pakistani ambassador to USA, Haqqani has written and been quoted at FP also:

"Hostilities between Pakistan and India continues, in Pakistan it serves as an important element of national identification."

In this book titled, Pakistan: Between Mosque and Military, Haqqani has analyzed Pakistan and its defining problems.

Pakistan of today, sadly represents the resultant of acutely bad leadership along with pursuance of self destructive national goals and objectives along with regressive religious obscurantism and love of violence as foreign policy tools.

 

XTIANGODLOKI

11:33 AM ET

July 22, 2011

Where has India been in the last 25-30 years?

"25-30 years from now, when India has a much larger and younger population than China, buttressed by a stronger civil society than China will ever form under its current regime"

AlexBC has always been against China, but I have no idea why he would be so pro-India. The fact is that 25-30 years ago China came out of the cultural revolution in a far worse conditions than India. Both of these nations grew significantly during this time which is good for all, but today you can easily argue that the average Chinese lives better than the average Indian. You see many Indian writers who display a weird superiority complex when it comes to Pakistan and inferiority complex when it comes to China and you have wonder why. Bashing Pakistan or China doesn't exactly improve India any nor will it stop China from growing.

Study from rights groups this year ranked India in the top 5 worst places to live for women, along with places like Afghanistan and rival Pakistan. It has one of the highest infant mortality rates in the world. It's more corrupt than even China. 1 out of 3 Indian women can't read, how the democracy can function properly under such conditions if baffling. Sure China has tons of issues but India has just as many if not more issues to deal with, with the flawed democracy system which often hinders rather than speed up the process.

What is true is that India will definitely surpass China in terms of population. Whether this is a good thing or bad thing depends on how well India can address its problems. If the past two decades is of any indication the only way for India to catch up to China is if China implodes from within. However if this happens the entire world will undergo a depression including India with China as its largest trading partner.

 

SREEKANTH

1:13 PM ET

July 22, 2011

>>> You see many Indian

>>> You see many Indian writers who display a weird superiority complex when it comes to Pakistan and inferiority complex when it comes to China and you have wonder why.

There might be an inferiority complex at work, but more likely these authors are using the Tom Friedman trick of making China the stand-in for whatever policy they want to support. As in "if China can build an 8-lane superhighway through the middle of a city, why can't India". The answer of course is that Indian planners can't just bulldoze the slums.

In my opinion China and India are not natural enemies. Each one has always had its own backyard, South Asia for India and Southeast Asia for China. In the early days of Indian independence, under Nehru, it was all Hindi-Chini bhai bhai (Indians and Chinese are brothers). After the Chinese invasions, things have gone into deep freeze.

And recent provocations by China haven't helped, like the Arunachal Pradesh visa issue. India has cordially reciprocated by modulating the activities of the Tibetan government in exile etc. The whole thing is silly but the good part is that both countries are so focused on economic growth that outright war is very unlikely.

My hope is some day soon there will be a Nixon-like moment and the whole relationship will flip. Maybe that will happen after China gets a more representative government.

 

THE DEVIL'S LAPDOG

1:30 PM ET

July 22, 2011

Tunnel you lack a Vision

Stories of Pakistan's eminent decline and destruction have been going on from decades. Yet, Pakistan has a stable middle class and some of the top schools in the world. However, the perception that Pakistan is falling apart completely takes place over reality.

India on the other hand has so many problems- not including external threats from Pakistan and China, but also problems with Nepal, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh. Also, internally, it faces opposition from Maoist rebels (who control the territory the size of Pakistan itself). I won't even get into its problems in Kashmir, Khalistan, Assam, Nagaland, etc. Yet, the media (especially in the West) chooses to show India as this happy land where stability rules and eveyone is Middle Class. I have lived in India, that is a bloody lie!

As for the origins of Indo-Pak tensions, I say they lie with fanatical and angry Hindu extremists who will always resent a Muslim presence in 'their' subcontinent. Especially one that does not serve under their domination as Pakistan does not. The Indian media and its Pakistan-obsessed fetish just shows the anti-Muslim hatred of most Hindus very succintly!

 

KUNINO

2:57 PM ET

July 22, 2011

Not hard to feel superior to

Not hard to feel superior to a country that gained independence 64 years ago and so far has bumped off five of its heads of state or government, and countless more second- and third-echelon leaders. A country that split in two when one major part of it marched out due to lousy administration from Islamabad, to form a new nation -- Bangladesh.

In this commentary about the missing $800 billion, no mention of the mutterings from senior Pakistani military figures that they didn't need that money anyway. I don't know whether that was based on the idea that they really didn't need it, or that they could replace it with a similar sum from Beijing. But it doesn't seem to have been the crushing blow Washington had in mind.

 

VISIONTUNNEL

7:35 AM ET

July 27, 2011

Understandable Naivety, Delusions & Twisted Beliefs

Dear Lapdog,
What Pakistani Army/ISI and its Rulers have been doing to India is well known and I am not going to repeat.

Perhaps unknown to you, Indian Muslims have achieved imminent positions in Politics, Bureaucracy, Education, Social work, Entertainment, Business, Industry and Trade.

I am not giving any names, please "Google" to educate yourself.

Apart from above the like any other citizen, Indian Muslims have also made name in field of crime, thuggery, money laundering and other dubious professions.

The biggest tax evader and money launders in India History is one Pune resident Hasan Ali, a rich horse breeder and a former scrap dealer.

However, it is well known that such news and views are of no use to you.

And please, give us a break and stop being fake spokesman of Indian Muslims, they have many old an modern leaders coming up. unlike Pakistani Muslim, who have unfortunately been afflicted with perennially bad leadership.

Well, if highly educated and opinionated Pakistanis like you think Chinese would better partners than Americans, it must be tried forthwith with out any delay.

Please do that, and we might discuss this issue in future, about your expectations and their instant fulfillment.

However, in Politics, there are no Permanent Friends and Enemies, but some people do have such hazy teenagers illusions, which might get ironed out in the EXPECTED adulthood.

The result would be totally difference, if some one never grows and remains a child.

 

BOBINPHILLY

5:44 PM ET

July 21, 2011

dangerously Ignirant

Why do these semi-informed articles appear so often these days.

The author must realize that in international relations, "KEEPING OPTIONS OPEN IS THE NAME OF THE GAME"

China considers Pakistan just one of its several options. It will support Pakistan as much as it believes Pakistan is worth to it for strategic purposes.

Pakistan knows it must play one power against other to survive. It will support China to get access to military technology, money and influence.

China knows Pakistan will never accept it as the only sugar daddy, neither will US ever completely abandon Pakistan, its too valuable a client state to do that.

Even if US-Pakistan relations cool down, Pakistan will maintain a strategic relationship with US just to keep its options open. China knows that, US knows that and Pakistan knows that. Only person who apparently does not knows that is this ill informed amateurish author.

 

NIHONSEAN

11:25 AM ET

July 22, 2011

Ignorant of the Irony

You do realize that there is a certain irony in the in the title of your post "Dangerously Ignirant"?

Also, the author's point isn't that Pakistan shouldn't play the field, it's the China is a poor substitute when it comes to providing anything but weapons.

 

444BAROFF

6:32 PM ET

July 21, 2011

Pakistan has also benefited from substantial trade and economic

Pakistan has also benefited from substantial trade and economic ties with China, particularly in infrastructure and mining. Beijing is Pakistan's largest trading partner, a relationship that was worth almost $9 billion last year. Sxe 11.9

 

VISIONTUNNEL

11:27 AM ET

July 22, 2011

Target 2015: Indo-China Trade to be 100 Billion Dollars

No doubt Pakistan has benefited and will continue to benefit with trade with China or any other nation.

In spite of their political posturing, Chinese and Indians are continue to increase their trade and rightly so. Decades back, Chinese had dumped their Marxist/Communist/Socialist-anti business ideals in to yellow sea, and how astute and even brutal traders and businessmen.

So the idea, that China will continue to side with sadly dysfunctional Pakistan at the cost of much more and wider trade with progressing India, is a fallacy and would not happen.

Chinese, in spite of past bonhomie and present platitude are increasingly worried about tentacles of Islamic fundamentalism reaching parts of Muslim population in China.

 

STRIVER

7:13 PM ET

July 21, 2011

GAWADAR and the China Factor

This is a totally biased article. What do you expect from an Indian journslaist. Is she a journslaist or a fiction writer.

Gawader is of immense strategic importance for both Paksitan and China. Simply put and as someone once said it is a 'Jewel In the Crown for Pakistan's economy.

It was back in 1964-65 that Pakistan idientified its potential and now it has made it a DUTY FREE and a FREE ECONOMIC ZONE. China would not have agreed to build and manage it had it not seen its economic potential.

It also means economic uplift for Balochistan.

Anyhtiong that boosts Paskistan's economy, gives Indians sleepless nights.

They fail to see that India could benefit from Gawader port too.

 

MAZO

1:39 AM ET

July 22, 2011

Gadwa- Pakistan's El Dorado

Anybody who has actually gone to Gadwar will tell you that it is a sad sad joke played on the Chinese by the Pakistanis. Gadwar is in the middle of a desert, surrounded by empty land as far as the eye can see. The only solitary road leading out of Gadwar passes through highly dangerous and highly mined road that the Baluchi tribes regularly attack. There is no police, there is no security and there is no civilization in and around Gadwar for miles. Even the Chinese have given up on making it a viable port for them to transport oil and gas over land to China.

The Baluchi tribes detest the port, the Chinese are uncertain yet the Pakistanis believe that this port is going to be their salvation because "other nations" are going to exploit it and take the risks while they just have to sit back and reap a windfall. This fantasy is what the Pakistani's have peddled to the Chinese and any who will hear but now even the Chinese have come to realize the cold hard truth.

 

NIHONSEAN

11:35 AM ET

July 22, 2011

The Author has Already Written About That

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/06/03/pakistan_s_black_pearl

 

VISIONTUNNEL

11:37 AM ET

July 22, 2011

Pakistan too could have benefitted by Indian Economy

Striver,

Please do not strive to extend biases, conjectures and blatant subterfuge.

 

THE DEVIL'S LAPDOG

1:50 PM ET

July 22, 2011

Gwadar is the port of the future

Looking at Gwadar today is like looking at Hollywood in the 1920s for someone without vision- "what does one expect from orange orchards in California?"

In the future, it will serve three purposes: (i) an alternative sea port to Karachi (which is too close to India); (ii) a way of sending oil to China; and (iii) a naval/intelligence post for things in the Middle East . The Chinese are smart, they are not going to spend billions on roads and ports for nothing. As for the Baluchi tribesmen, when the oil flows you can easily buy them off.

I disagree with some of the commentators that Islam is the great threat to China. The greatest threat to China is from CHRISTIANITY- growing like a plague to over 100 million from almost zero decades ago. A growing foreign religion that is tilted to the West (America) can be a very dangerous internal threat to China if a war between the US and China ever breaks out!

 

VISIONTUNNEL

8:20 AM ET

July 27, 2011

Striving to be a Perenninally Delusional Hater of the Truth

Going beyond this article, the reactions like yours are part of age old cast iron narrative.

Looks like Pakistani Rulers, you too love to term hard truth as mere fiction.

Examples:

1. OBL was not hiding in Pakistan but in Afghanistan.

2. Now it is not still believed Mullah Omar, Jawahiri other terrorists are hiding in Pakistan.

3. Captured Pakistani Terrorist, Kasab was not a Pakistani.

4. ISI had no role in 26/11 Attack, in spite of multiple evidences and verifiable electronic footprints and other evidences from various sources.

5, Pakistan never attacked India and it was always other way around.

6. ISI and its agents had no role in hijacking of Indian Airlines Flight IC 184.

7. It was not believed that Bali bomber was also hiding in same Abbotabad, where OBL was found with numbers of wives and half a dozen kids.

8. ISI is still hiding about 50 Indian Terrorists and other criminals and using them to bleed India.

9. ISI is busy printing counterfeit Indian and Other currencies and must have learned the fine trade from Chinese who did it with perfection in past and believed to be still involved.

10. ISI has been behind smoke screen propaganda of Indian excesses in Kashmir by agents in USA and Europe.

I can go on, but wont serve any purpose and what ever i have reminded, might no affect any delusional jingoist working to a plan.

But surprises do happen too

 

BASHY QURAISHY

12:01 PM ET

July 22, 2011

" Sorry, Pakistan: China Is

" Sorry, Pakistan: China Is No Sugar Daddy" by URMILA VENUGOPALAN is another example of Foreign Policy set up gone berserk in its anti-Pakistan propaganda. FP must be desperate to do the bidding for State Department, since it cannot find any other reasonable and well-informed person to write about Pakistan and China relationship. Please ask Dr. Shireen Mazari of Pakistan. She can give you a much more nuanced analysis of the 50 years old and still getting strong relationship of these two countries. There are other competent journalists and observers among the international academia who write about Pakistan. I can recommend Anatol Lieven who wrote a very detailed yet objective book about Pakistan titled: Pakistan - a hard country.
The problem is not the dearth of information but the desire of western think tanks and media as well as policy makers to present Muslim countries, especially Pakistan in to a negative light and a nation, which needs rearrangement, ( Read destruction or occupation). The problem is that Pakistan is like a bone stuck in the throat of USA. American would like to swallow it but cannot because it is too big and sharp on the edges nor they can take it out, because it will destabilise the balance of power in the region and America’s plan against China.
Urmilla apparently has no clue as to what ticks between Pakistan and China. First of all, China/Pak relationship are much older than the recent events. China has never let Pakistan down in the hour of need. Secondly, China does treat Pakistan and other allies as equal partners and not subservient colonies, which USA usually thinks. Thirdly China’s policy is not based on interests (which by the way, all countries do) but genuine desire to help Pakistan in economic, social and political fields. Urmilla should visit Pakistan and see the Heavy Industry Complex in Taxila, which Chinese helped Pakistan to build in sixties. There are hundreds of other projects, China has provided assistance to.
So FP and Urmilla, please do write critically about Pakistan but do not deceive your readers by dishing out constantly, one sided anti-Pakistan poison. It does not suit your publication, your reputation and it certainly does not build bridges.
Kind regards

 

PETERBERGEN

10:36 PM ET

July 22, 2011

What do Chinese think of Pakistanis?

You want to know what the Chinese really think of Pakistanis?

Here you go

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0u474Gx4kc

 

XTIANGODLOKI

12:17 PM ET

July 22, 2011

There are no free lunchs in geopolitics

There are never any true "friends" or "enemies" when it comes to politics. Of course Pakistan is not expected to get free lunches when it comes to China just as India should not expect to get free lunches when it comes to the US. IMO the one thing which could sour the the sino-pakistan relationship is the terrorist situation in Pakistan. They are flooding into the western region of China from Pakistan. In this sense China is getting a taste of what India has been getting. The difference is that the international media treats those who bomb India as terrorists but the bombers in China are described often as "uighur activists".

 

PETERBERGEN

10:33 PM ET

July 22, 2011

India should give Nucke technology to Vietnam

I don't know what India is waiting for, India ought to give Nucklear weapons/Tech to Vietnam and all its nebigours who are vary of China.

Its as simple as that.

 

PETERBERGEN

10:38 PM ET

July 22, 2011

This is what the Chinese think of Pakistan.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E0u474Gx4kc

This explains it much better than any article here.

LOL :)

Oh Lordie!

 

PETERSMITHSON

10:14 AM ET

August 10, 2011

Lets put the pressure on Pakistan through India

Pakistan and especially the ISI & certain elements of the military have shown themselves in recent events to be duplicitous to say the least. Giving out military gift vouchers and other aid does not seem to work alone. Time for Pakistan to face the music

Lets try cosying up a lot closer to India. Maybe sell them some really advanced weapons (but too many) and really sing their praises. By Christmas we might see a change in attitude in Islamabad. And China? Well maybe the West should focus on making China a key trading partner instead of China.

 

GLAYDS QUILLEN

6:02 AM ET

August 15, 2011

Sorry, Pakistan: China Is No Sugar Daddy

Nineteen people were killed in two separate incidents in the ancient Silk Road city of alexis texas over the weekend in the latest wave of violence to hit the restive Xinjiang region, home to a mainly Muslim Uighur minority.The Kashgar local government said in a statement on its website that the assailants who attacked a restaurant that left six dead on Sunday had learned explosive-making skills in terrorist-run camps in Pakistan.“The heads of the group had learned skills of making explosives and firearms in overseas camps of the terrorist group East Turkestan Islamic Movement (ETIM) in Pakistan before entering Xinjiang,” the online statement said.The attackers adhered to “extremist religious ideology” and advocated “jihad”,the statement also said.Chinese authorities have accused the ETIM, which wants an independent homeland for Xinjiang’s Uighurs, of. The US and the United Nations have listed the group as a “terrorist” organisation and China has previously said it has operations in Pakistan as well as Afghanistan.

 

AXELBROOK

5:58 AM ET

August 19, 2011

Remember his celebrity tour

Remember his celebrity tour overseas... how he played basketball and spoke to all those Germans. Oh, my bad... you said "policy." I can't think of a thing.. RIO .

 

STEPHENIE142

7:07 PM ET

August 19, 2011

Sorry, Pakistan: China Is No Sugar Daddy

Just because Washington and Islamabad are at odds doesn't mean Beijing is looking to step in. True Yhwh .. And The future will tell us as to who's using whom .. As the author mentions ,Clearly china has a strategic interest in building ports and reaching the warm waters of the Arabian Sea . Ask the Chinese and they would much rather have stable ties with India due to their growing bilateral trade which is tilted towards Chinese imports into India. Pakistan is aware of the large economic ac new york city hotels Dear Lapdog, What Pakistani Army/ISI and its Rulers have been doing to India is well known and I am not going to repeat. Perhaps unknown to you, Indian Muslims have achieved imminent positions in Politics, Bureaucracy, Education, Social work, Entertainment, Business, Industry and Trade. I am not giving any names, please "Google" to educate yourself. Apart from above the like any other citizen, Ind.

 

RICHARD HEAD

4:17 AM ET

August 20, 2011

 

DAYSI LOTH

4:59 AM ET

August 20, 2011

China Is No Sugar Daddy

Agreeing on expectations with a sugar daddy or sugar baby often happens early on in a sugar relationship. Yet whether you’re a lurker newbie sugar, or more familiar with sugar daddy dating, maintaining a lexi belle mutually beneficial relationship often takes more than just a one-time agreement about each others benefits .Many sugar daddies and sugar babies use their profiles to make their expectations for a potential arrangement as crystal clear as possible. On SA, sugar babies can specify their desired monthly allowance in a dollar-range from 1 to twenty thousand monthly. Whereas sugar daddies on SA can specify their desired  monthly budget for their sugar baby. Often expected within the first few initial meets with a potential sugar, is the ‘set-up‘ for the arrangement. Many sugars prefer to have the allowance talk as soon as possible, as to begin enjoying the fruits of their mutually beneficial relationship sooner than later. Some sugars prefer to have the allowance talk in the form of emails or messages on the site, while others like to have it over coffee or other type of in-person setting, but before any significant benefits are exchanged. However some sugars opt for a ‘test drive‘, in which the sugar daddy, and/or sugar baby allow for their benefits to be experienced before the arrangement has been finalized.

 

FREESPIRIT

11:39 AM ET

August 20, 2011