The Prince of Persia

Machiavelli’s got nothing on Iran’s Supreme Leader.

BY KARIM SADJADPOUR | JULY 21, 2011

Nobody has ever confused Niccolo Machiavelli with an Islamic revolutionary -- but he certainly knew a thing or two about revolutions. The Florentine political philosopher watched his native city overthrow, restore, and then overthrow again the powerful Medici family. And it was in this hotbed of backstabbing clans, religious favoritism, and political power plays that Machiavelli sharpened his teeth. Ah, how he would have enjoyed the Tehran of today.

Half a millennia later, the author of The Prince and intellectual father of realpolitik has found one of his most impressive students in Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei -- another leader well-acquainted with the exercise of acquiring, and keeping, political power. Indeed, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, whose rise (and now his seeming fall from grace) was orchestrated by Khamenei, is the third Iranian head of state (preceded by Hashemi Rafsanjani and Mohammed Khatami) whom Khamenei has outmaneuvered.

This is only the latest struggle from which Khamenei appears to have come out on top. For the last 22 years, he's woken up every morning and gone to bed every night believing not only that many of his own subjects want to unseat him, but also that the greatest superpower in the world is plotting his demise. In summer 2009, his worst fears became reality when millions of Iranians took to the streets to protest Ahmadinejad's tainted reelection. Some of them chanted slogans of "Death to Khamenei" and "Khamenei is an assassin, his rulership is annulled."

Yet after Oman's Sultan Qaboos and Libyan leader Muammar al-Qaddafi -- who continues to hang by a thread -- Khamenei is now the longest serving autocrat in the Middle East.

It is no accident that Khamenei has succeeded thus far in beating back the challenge posed by the Green Movement. Despite his Shiite pretentions, his ruling ideology is more Machiavelli than martyrdom. It's a fact that Machiavelli himself -- who trudged around Italy with papal armies, marveling at the combination of military might and religious authority -- would have observed with a knowing smile.

Throughout Khamenei's rule, he has held to five basic tenets that reflect the philosophy of statecraft -- and stagecraft -- embodied in Machiavelli's famous treatise.

BEHROUZ MEHRI/AFP/Getty Images

 

Karim Sadjadpour is an associate at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and author of Reading Khamenei: The Worldview of Iran's Most Powerful Leader.

JJJONAS

8:14 AM ET

July 22, 2011

Especially when comparing

Especially when comparing fantasy with real life. And those people who haven't read the series would probably feel "lost" reading this article. This story would have been better for a blog, however I had fun reading it. Seo paslaugos Especially when comparing fantasy with real life. And those people who haven't read the series would probably feel "lost" reading this article. This story would have been better for a blog, however I had fun reading it.

 

ILOVEKNOWLEDGE

11:57 AM ET

July 22, 2011

Regime Change

Interesting analysis Mr. Sadjadpour. The only thing I would say is that Khamanei has been hated for many years - well before the 2009 election fraud. And in addition, one must not discount that he is a true believer and believes in the return of "imam mahdi" which would mean nuclear weapons in the hands of this regime can result in apocalyptic consequences.

Let's not ignore the religious element of their ideology - driven home from the foundation of this illegal regime by Khomeini in the fact that he refused peace with Iraq when he had several opportunities - "to Saudi Arabia, Palestine, and the west we go!" in their sick and twisted minds. And yes, I am Iranian. :)

 

SIDROCK23

12:56 PM ET

July 22, 2011

another cry baby article by a rich boy from tehran

leave it to some spoiled brat from north theran (iloveknowledge) to approve of another BS article from a sheltered and panzy persian living out in beverly hills. let's take a look at reality. back under khatami when a real grand bargain was proposed, why did the U.S government turn it down? whose decision and stupidity was that? perhaps some of you persian enjoyed the days of being a colonized state of britian and the soviets. or being known as a puppet client state of the U.S under the rule of the artifical shah. I'll give the current iranian regime this much, at least they have a spine and pair of balls. karim would do anything to bend over for obama or the israelis no matter how much they want to screw of over iran. let's not forget that most of the chicken shit iranians ran away when sadaam invaded. who saved iran then? let's not forget that in a region that is plagued with wahabisim, suicide bombings, illetracy, and third world mud huts for homes, iran still is a more stable and safe place. who has maintained that? regardless of how a-holeish this current regime might be, thank your lucky starts that it hasn't been bombed by the israelis or become a playground for american troops and contractors.

 

SUNNYMIG6

6:52 PM ET

July 22, 2011

+1

+1

 

ROBINDER

2:42 PM ET

July 22, 2011

Sidrock, learn how to read/write/spell English....

"illeteracy?"
"thank your lucky starts?"
In order for you to be a more effective apologist for your "a-holish" regime in Tehran you should first learn how to speak properly.

 

SUNNYMIG6

6:56 PM ET

July 22, 2011

Americans will never be happy

Americans will never be happy with the idea of self determinism. They cant comprehend a nation creating their own governing system. Everyone should follow the Americans, they are enlightened. To you the Americans and Northern Tehrani's Khaminie might be a autocrat, but for the 70 million people in Iran he is their leader, say whatever you cant and continue your wishful thinking, say it to yourself so much that you start believing in it, and when you invade as liberators. You'll see what happens. Cant come to terms with the idea that they have something thats working, its been 30 years of continuous covert and 8 year of physical war and you havn't been able to break the IRI. The people know of your hypocrisy to well. They see that you only advocate freedom and demo. were it is your best interest, Don't think you will fool them into believing that you want to help the Irani people.

 

ROSTAM_

10:07 AM ET

July 24, 2011

Karim Sadjadpour youre wrong

i think that youre wrong, iran is not ready for democracy and will stay as an Islamic Republic since this is what the people want!

 

NPIRMOAZEN

11:21 AM ET

July 26, 2011

Game is the same game, just players have changed!

In the last three decades, I was involved in Pollitics in Iran especially after 2nd Khordad and as an insider Reformist, I could say that this peper is so comprehensive, realistic and informative to express the real soul and face of our politics pyramid in Iran, just looks like you did not highlighted the religious grassroot of conflict that he had in his legitimacy as a Fagih or Ayatollah! But , yes! Game is the same game and just players have changed! The King has changed his appearance, clothes and shoes but the legacy of Monarchy and Machiavelism still crippled the Country! The Old History of Tyranny is still alive in Iran even after Revolution or Reform or Colorful Movements! Good Job Karim!

 

INKBLOT

6:57 PM ET

July 28, 2011

Another naaive article

Another superficial article by Karim and inspired by freshman college textbooks.

Your comment “another leader well-acquainted with the exercise of acquiring, and keeping, political power” contradicts you acknowledging that he is in fact a lot more than that later in your article. So, are his powers just political or are they not? You can’t write these articles in the same way a palm reader reads palms, saying things that may be true no matter whose palm is being read.
“For the last 22 years, he's woken up every morning and gone to bed every night believing not only that many of his own subjects want to unseat him, but also that the greatest superpower in the world is plotting his demise.”
That’s another naïve comment. How do you know what he thinks about before going to bed and after he wakes up? Not only you this doesn’t provide substantive information, but if anything, it implies you have slept with Khamenei for 22 years.

To imply that Ghaddafi is an autocrat is another attempt to brown nose those who sign your paycheck every month. Even C.J. Chivers, the New York times reporter who has been to and back from the Libyan frontlines doesn’t call Ghaddafi an autocrat and in fact he casts doubts over the intentions of the rebel forces and their masters in NATO. The other comparisons you make with Machiavelli’s prince are as hollow as the ones before it, since the opposition in Iran doesn’t have to guess who is to blame for all the mishaps in the last few years – as more of the thinking of the Iranian leadership has been revealed in public; thanks to the 2009 elections as the catalyst. In fact, Khamenei is not the “man behind the curtain.” If we accept your criteria for “the man behind the curtain,” then we should call Bush junior the “man behind the curtain,” too, since it wasn’t Bush himself who waterboarded anyone; someone else did it after he signed the dotted line that said it’s okay. It’s a travesty that you should base your perceptions of what goes on in Iran on hits from a Google search.

See, here you are again trying to play both sides of the isle in Iran by calling Khomeini a charismatic leader. Humility is, by the way, considered a virtue in all of the Iranian society. It’s not an exclusive trait of any single or group of clergy. It’s like saying the Japanese emperor is polite, and then attribute some menace to his politeness.

“So don't expect Tehran to barter away its spinning nuclear centrifuges anytime soon.” Why in hell should Tehran do such an idiotic act? Every single one of the P5+1 countries that pass resolution after resolution against Iran is a nuclear power itself. Even the STUXNET virus attacked nuclear activity that was sanctioned by and under the supervision of the IAEA. It’s clear, Karim, that even though you present yourself as this clean shaven guy in a suit and tie, you really have no appreciation or understanding for scientific progress. Worse than that, you have no clue what price the nation has had to pay for such progress and you wanted it all handed over to western managers. You are Nasereddin shah himself reincarnated.

 

INKBLOT

12:19 AM ET

July 30, 2011

Failing to take a stand

"don't expect Tehran to barter away its spinning nuclear centrifuges anytime soon. "

Iran would be a fool to stop spinning its centrifuges, especially now because Saudi Arabia is already in talks with the U.S. to acquire civilian nuclear technology. In her meeting with the Saudi Prince, Hillary Clinton was all smiles and she never asked the prince or cast doubt on his country's intentions to import civilian nuclear technology while sitting on a sea of oil. Remember, this has been one of several arguments the U.S. administration put forward when accusing Iran of diverting nuclear technology for military use and when imposing unilateral sanctions on Iran.

Since you brought up the issue in your article, you could at least ask why the U.S. administration persists so overtly to apply a double standard toward Iran versus other countries regarding issues that range from nuclear proliferation to human rights violations. But wait, no...you could not do that. I almost forgot if you did that, your employer might not like it very much. I mean, hey, being a copout has its benefits, too.

 

KEVEN RAX

6:09 AM ET

August 15, 2011

The Prince of Persia

Prince of Persia: The Sands of Time is a third-person action-adventure computer and video game published by jesse jane. It was released on November 21, 2003 and is a reboot of the landmark MS-DOS and Macintosh game series Prince of Persia, created by Jordan Mechner in 1989.The Sands of Time,developed internally at Ubisoft Montreal, successfully captures the mechanics of the original platformer and extends it to the 3D generation. An earlier attempt by The Learning Company to transfer the game to 3D (Prince of Persia 3D) was released in 1999, but despite its initial good reception failed to sell enough and the company responsible behind that original trilogy was already closing doors. The Sands of Time was praised for its visual design, finely tuned game mechanics, and intriguing storyline, winning the game several awards.It was also able to find its place in many 100 best of games lists.The game was developed for the PC, PlayStation 2, Nintendo GameCube, Xbox, and later a 2D-version for the Game Boy Advance and mobile phones. The success of The Sands of Time led to two sequels, Prince of Persia: Warrior Within and Prince of Persia: The Two Thrones, in 2004 and 2005, respectively, and an interquel, Prince of Persia: The Forgotten Sands in 2010. A remastered, High-Definition, version of The Sands of Time was released on the PlayStation Network for the PlayStation 3 on November 16, 2010

 

AXELBROOK

5:59 AM ET

August 19, 2011

It doens't matter because

It doens't matter because sooner or later the glass ceiling will fall on the hearts of the american people. RIO Did you know I can see Russia from my house? That is a fun fact!.

 

RACHELL ARMANT

3:39 AM ET

August 20, 2011

prince

The Prince pursues and catches up to Farah once more atop the Tower of Dawn, which he must climb from the outside. When the Prince finally reaches the top he finds Farah being overwhelmed by the sand monsters and, despite his efforts to save her, she falls to her death in the Hourglass room below. Enraged by his lover's death, the Prince uses the Dagger to massacre the last of the sand monsters in the tower and descends to weep over Farah's body. As the Prince mourns, the Vizier emerges from the shadows and offers the Prince a partnership in his evil plan. The Prince angrily refuses and before the Vizier can stop him he drives the Dagger of Time into the Hourglass and reverses time to the night before the invasion of the Maharajah's kingdom. The Prince awakens, still with the Dagger of Time, and secretly finds his way to Farah's bedroom, where he tells her the whole story, which she does not remember as it had not happened yet. However, the Vizier discovers the Prince, and fearing his planned treachery already revealed, jenna haze attempts to kill both Farah and the Prince. In the ensuing battle the Prince kills the Vizier. He then returns the Dagger of Time to Farah, who asks why the Prince invented such an unbelievable story to prove the Vizier's treachery. The Prince falsely admits it to be just a story but when asked about his name by Farah he replies,"Just call me, Kakolookiyam," before departing, leaving Farah amazed.