Far from the Worst Congress Ever

Democracy isn't always pretty, but here's why the down-to-the-wire debt ceiling debate actually shows government is working.

BY AMY KAUFFMAN | AUGUST 1, 2011

How can this Congress be the worst ever, when it is the first in recent times to actually address the United States' looming debt and step in to assert its legitimate authority? Throughout this budget process, Congress has demonstrated sincerity in its duty, and Sunday, July 31's, debt ceiling deal puts the country on the path to ending the crisis.

On Jan. 6, when the 112th House of Representatives convened, the first order of business was to read the U.S. Constitution aloud. One might think this would be routine each session, as all 435 elected representatives are asked to take an oath to "support and defend" it. Yet surprisingly, this was the first time that the House had members read the Constitution in full.

As dictated by the Constitution, Congress's most important power is the power of the purse. Article 1 states, "No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law." This authority allows Congress not only the ability to tax, as well as sell government goods, properties, and services, but also to borrow on the credit of the United States. Congress, therefore, is responsible for the debt that the United States incurs.

This control is not only Congress's right, but a central duty. If Congress allows expenditures to grow unchecked, it has failed in its authority. This is crucial in the system as it allows a check to the president's budget, limiting spending by the executive branch. Constitutionally, the president may get to write the budget, but it is within Congress's power to suggest a different one and to curtail spending as it chooses.

For weeks, much of the media and most pundits have aligned to take swipes at the speaker of the House and members of the House such as Paul Ryan, chairman of the Budget Committee. While no one wants the entitlement party to end, someone has to be the adult in the room and recognize it is going to take serious cuts to get the United States back on the right path. And that responsibility has to fall on Congress.

The House of Representatives was established by America's Founding Fathers as the government body closest to the people, as it is elected every two years. The House, more than any other part of the U.S. federal government, best represents the United States' diversity as a nation. And because of this multiplicity in opinions, passions, and economic concerns, the House at times battles itself. Throughout the Federalist Papers, it is recognized that the United States will be a diverse nation filled with countering ambitions and contrary viewpoints that will be recognized through ardent debate.

The Constitution set up a series of checks and balances by giving equal, but different, powers to the branches of the federal government. Remember that word: equal. The president does not rule alone. Congress as a whole is an equal partner with a responsibility to provide oversight of the executive branch. For some time, Congress has not exercised this responsibility effectively. This was especially true during the first two years of President Barack Obama's term, when the House, Senate, and executive branch were under the control of the same party. It is tough to be the overseer when criticism is seen as undermining one's own party.

Alex Wong/Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: U.S. CONGRESS, HISTORY
 

Amy Kauffman is director of congressional relations at the Hudson Institute.

JOHNRDKIDD

12:52 AM ET

August 2, 2011

US paying Israel $8.2 Million EVERY DAY!

America votes to increase its debt ceiling, yet the US taxpayer is still paying the Israeli government $8.2 million EVERY DAY! Unemployment is still rising yet the government is happy to continue the free gift (from failed former president GW Bush) of more than $500 for every Israeli man, woman and child, every 12 months, when the economy in Tel Aviv is apparently booming. Is this for real?

Wake-up America before you turn into a terminal nut case!

 

VR

7:04 AM ET

August 2, 2011

This is grossly inaccurate.

I got to the part where, in reference to Speaker Boehner and Rep. Ryan the author writes, "while no one wants the entitlement party to end, someone has to be the adult in the room and recognize it is going to take serious cuts to get the United States back on the right path." I could not bear to read further. The truth of the matter is that these two men, and Speaker Boehner particularly, used this potentially catastrophic event to earn political favor for their funders. This had nothing to do with entitlements, in fact entitlement spending was not even addressed in the current round of budget cuts (which instead focus solely on defense and non-defense discretionary spending).

I strongly suggest the author brush up on her econ. Perhaps also I would suggest reviewing GOP political history, which features Boehner and other Republicans consistently voting to raise the debt limit as a purely administrative procedure.

 

KUNINO

12:32 PM ET

August 2, 2011

Is this piece worth reading through?

Its opening sentence is calamitous, with its "How can this Congress be the worst ever, when it is the first in recent times to actually address the United States' looming debt and step in to assert its legitimate authority?"

The House of Representatives has addressed the ceiling annually for more than 30 years. What happened this year was a different way of looking at the issue, and all the deal has achieved is to push the issue a little further back on the shelf. Nothing's changed. Debt will continue to grow. The US government will not be able to pay it off in any degree because it's not allowed (by the Tea Party, seemingly the closest thing to a Higher Power) and other Republican representatives to raise new taxes.

I'm able to contain my bliss about this promise of continuing misfortune.

 

COMICUS

12:48 PM ET

August 2, 2011

Not so fast

The part about raising taxes/revenue that so many seem to ignore is that every single time any government raises revenue, they only spend more rather than pay down debt. Politicians are like crack addicts when it comes to spending money that isn't theirs. If I thought there was even the remotest chance that raising taxes would actually improve our debt situation, I would support it. Fact is, it never works as intended, or at least presented.

 

COMICUS

12:43 PM ET

August 2, 2011

A bit of cheerleading for nothing?

While I do agree that this Congress finally started to exercise their Constitutional duties, they most certainly didn't accomplish anything worthwhile. Throwing us a number like "$2.4 Trillion over the next ten years" is about as meaningful as just saying "we'll save some money for you next month." Our debt AND our deficit have grown to such enormous levels that championing this toilet tissue of a bill is almost laughable, if it wasn't so serious. They could cut $2.4 Trillion EVERY YEAR for the next ten years and we still wouldn't be on a path to sustainable fiscal policy due to all of the other policies and the general lack of political will on Capitol Hill. Both parties have worked hard for many decades to drive us this far into the ground; there's no way either one will enact any true "sweeping reforms" that have a lasting and positive effect on this nation. Look at the latest attempt for that: ObamaCare. I get warm fuzzies just thinking about how my children and grandchildren will be stuck having to deal with that gem.

 

COMPASSIONFORBOTHSIDES

2:14 PM ET

August 2, 2011

Sweeping reforms are

Sweeping reforms are impossible because if one party proposes it, the other party will block it. And no one is better at blocking reform in recent years than the GOP.

The reason the Health Care Bill is such a joke was due to the Democrats bending over for the GOP and gutting many of the main reform ideas. Just like this debt bill that doesn't address revenues. Instead of public health care alternatives, we have mandatory health care that only benefits the insurance companies. And which politicians take the most money from insurance companies? Not hard to guess.

It's a great point that politicians tend to just use revenues to spend more and not pay down debts, but is it not better for those revenues to come from taxpayers that aren't spending? The poor and middle class stand to lose far more from our debt situation than anyone else, and they are the ones who spend the vast majority of their income. Spending that drives our economy.

As for the author of this clearly biased joke of an article, where were you and your congress during the entire Bush administration? Funny how that period of time is not mentioned once in your article. Let's continue to cut social services for children so we can ship millions to Afghan warlords

 

COMICUS

4:00 PM ET

August 2, 2011

Actually...

If you go back and look, the Democrats had full control of both Houses as well as the crafting of the legislation behind closed doors. The problem faced by Obama, Pelosi, and Reid was not the Republicans, it was members of their own party and the tens of millions of constituents who wanted nothing to do with it once details began leaking out. Can you honestly say that it was a responsible act of Congress (by all parties) to pass such a massive and far-reaching piece of legislation that nobody had even read? Are we really supposed to benefit from all of the BS garbage that was shoved into this thing, much of which has absolutely nothing to do with healthcare, ie. change in tax reporting for gold transactions? And if you really look at the numbers, yes the Republicans receive more contributions from insurance companies, but the Democrats aren't exactly getting chump change, with some years seeing only about a 2% difference between parties.

Ironically, if you look at the campaign financial data of both parties, the Democrats have consistently generated more contributions, spent more, and carried a higher level of DEBT than Republicans, with the only exception being two campaign seasons over the past decade where Republicans gained a slight margin above Democrats.

Although it could have been written more clearly, the author did imply that there was blame upon the Bush Administration when she only mentioned that since 2007, have the Republicans actually been resisting raising the debt ceiling. I would say that times of complete Republican control of government have not exactly put us on the path to fiscal responsibility either, so please don't think that I'm letting them off the hook for this mess.

 

KUNINO

6:55 PM ET

August 2, 2011

Oh, come on, COMICUS ...

Yiou really believe that "the tens of millions of constituents who wanted nothing to do with it once details [of the Obama healthcare plan] began leaking out."

Leaking out? What turned off many of those ten s of millions and probable most of them was a campaign of deliberate lies by political opponents who felt lying was the best way to stall or cripple the legislation. Remember those fictional death panels? And I have to say, the evidence in that mess suggests that yes, the best way to get tens of millions of Americans to take your side in any dispute is to tell them frightening lies.

How weird they are ("Barack Obama is not an American citizen") doesn't matter. Frightening lies: it's the way to go.

 

GLOBALFORCES

12:58 AM ET

August 6, 2011

Well, Stanley, who got us into this fine mess?

Well, Stanley, who got us into this fine mess?

Here's an interesting chart on wikipedia, showing "National debt by U.S. presidential terms" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_debt_by_U.S._presidential_terms

From Harry Truman through Jimmy Carter, every single president after World War Two managed to leave office with a lower debt than when they entered.

When Carter left office the debt was just 32% of GDP.

Reagan and the first Bush between them almost doubled the debt left behind by Carter. The two Bushes alone have increased the size of the debt, compared to the country’s annual production, by almost half.

So, obviously the current crisis is Barack Obama’s fault.

While the Tea Party and uneducated sympathizers sit around trying to cool down under their ceiling fans, foregoing their federal wages for the good of the country they are so committed to, or donating their silver jewelry.

No, they leave their global mess behind and go off on their publicly funded /holiday/!!

 

AXELBROOK

5:36 AM ET

August 19, 2011

Yes, the US knows nothing

Yes, the US knows nothing about foreign policy. That is why they are the most successful nation in the history of the planet. Wow, maybe some of you 3rd world nations should get together and 'splain things to us. That would really help us out. RIO Thanks.

 

MARISA KEMPTER

10:10 PM ET

August 19, 2011

Far from the Worst Congress Ever

The bailouts were incredibly unpopular, so the Congress plowed ahead with them, forcing them down our throats. Health Care legislation that forces everyone to deal with a government controlled system whether they want to or not and unconstitutionally requires them to purchase something even if they don’t want to was wildly unpopular jenna jameson , so the Congress shoved it down our collective throats as well. Cap and Trade legislation was pushed, and is now being pushed again, which will drive up costs of everything moved by road, rail or rotor, and your money was taken from you so that it could buy out GM and Chrysler, and a few Wall Street firms who just happened to be former employers of both the current and former Secretaries of the Treasury. All of this was completely out of touch with the American people, and when protests began to spontaneously erupt around the country, the protesters were denounced as racists and extremists, even though they reflected by far the majority view of the nation. I begin to wonder if maybe we all called Congress and told them we really loved a particular bill and needed it, that might be the way to stop passage of one of these monstrous things. I go into details of Congressmen proudly proclaiming that they “hadn’t read the bill”, or showing total disdain for their constituents (like having a cell phone conversation while a constituent was trying to make a point), or not paying taxes on Bahama vacation properties while they sit on the tax authority of the nation -the Ways and Means committee, or any of a dozen other despicable examples. I think everybody knows pretty well that this Congress seems to have taken all the disdain for the common man demonstrated by the 110th, and increased it ten fold. This Congress knows what is good (or bad) for all of us and we peasants had better shut up and take it.

 

IDEA

1:24 PM ET

August 28, 2011

States provided very little money and stuff

The People wouldn't put up with taxation and the several States provided very little money and stuff to the Revolutionary Army.

 

YARINSIZ

10:04 PM ET

August 28, 2011

This had nothing to do with

This had nothing to do with entitlements, in fact entitlement spending was not even addressed in the seslisiteler current round of budget cuts (which instead focus solely on defense and non-defense discretionary spending).

 

CRUNCHBERRY21

8:21 PM ET

August 29, 2011

Too Many Reform Ideas

Our debt & our deficit have become to such enormous levels that championing this mouthwash of the bill is nearly laughable, whether it wasn't so serious.

Both sides been employed by hard for a lot of decades they are driving us this far in to the ground; there is no way each one will enact any true "sweeping reforms" which have an enduring and positive impact on this nation. Consider the latest work for balance that: ObamaCare incometimesten I recieve warm fuzzies just considering how the kids and grandchildren is going to be stuck suffering that gem.

 

RUDDERMANN

9:01 AM ET

August 31, 2011

The Debt Will Help China economy

When Nixon was president a long time ago he might not have predicted that which was happening within the great country of America at this time. Using the economy in tatters, the government reserve taking matters to their own hands, along with inadequate solar water heaters Nixon wouldn't be proud to determine what's happening at this time within the great country of America.

The worry at this time is China thinks the U.S. will collapse. However in wherein isn't good because China owns many of the U.S. and will also affect them for the short term, and in the grander scale of things. Despite the fact that China realizes it presently has top of the hand, if they're to consider within the superpower role from the American empire, it won't happen for quite some time. You can't simply take a superpower role instantly, it requires some time and it's not an easy process.