The Renminbi An Exorbitant Burden The New Triumvirate

The Euro and the Scalpel

Let's be clear: The European economies are in a life-or-death struggle. And the only smart solution now is to split the common currency in two.

BY EDWARD HUGH | AUGUST 9, 2011

Looking back over the last 18 months of Europe's debt crisis, economist Lorenzo Bini Smaghi, a member of the European Central Bank's executive board, recently invoked Winston Churchill's famous quip, "You can always count on Americans to do the right thing -- after they've tried everything else."

And Europeans too, he assured his audience, would also get it right -- eventually. But all the coming and going since the Greek crisis broke out has taken its toll, which can be seen in the growing lack of market confidence that a lasting solution to the underlying problems will finally be found. Even the Americans seem to be having difficulty doing the right thing this time around, or at least doing it at the right moment, as the market turbulence following Standard & Poor's downgrade of U.S. overeign debt served to underline.

It's probably too soon to say whether Europe's leaders have actually agreed on what would be the "right thing" to do, but at least they now seem to recognize the full extent of the problems they're facing. Fundamental changes to the continent's financial system are now on the table. Options now being openly debated even include a measure thought unthinkable a year ago: ending Europe's 13-year experiment with a single currency. But even if this ultimate possibility -- the so-called nuclear option -- were to come to pass, as always there would be a right way and a wrong way of going about it.

So how bad is it? In a word, very. The latest round in the European sovereign debt crisis has been, without a shadow of a doubt, the most serious and the most potentially destabilizing for the global financial system of any we have seen to date. Pressure on the bond spreads in the debt markets of the countries on Europe's troubled periphery have become so extreme that the European Central Bank (ECB) was forced to change course only three days after its regular monthly meeting in August, intervening with shock and awe in the Spanish and Italian bond markets. While the size of the intervention is still unknown, market estimates range from between 4 billion euros and 9 billion euros in the space of two days. To put this number in some sort of perspective, the entire bond-purchasing program to date for Greece, Ireland, and Portugal has only involved some 74 billion euros, and this in more than a year of intervention.

Along with earlier interventions in Ireland, Portugal, and Greece, the ECB has become the "buyer of last resort" of peripheral Europe's bonds, but this can only be an interim measure because the volume of bonds that would need to be purchased on an ongoing basis is so massive that it would put the bank well outside the limits of its original founding charter.

The gravity of the situation was highlighted on Aug. 3, when European Commission President José Manuel Barroso explained to reporters that the current "tensions in bond markets reflect a growing concern among investors about the systemic capacity of the euro area to respond to the evolving crisis."

To be clear, what is involved is no longer an issue of Greek debt restructuring or of the extent of private-sector involvement in any such debt adjustment. The current crisis is an existential one, which if left unresolved will result in a contagion -- a matter of life of death for Europe's single currency. At the very same moment in which the ECB was deciding on its latest program of bond purchases, concerns were already being aired in the German media that the sums involved in a generalized rescue might be too large for even the richest countries in the core to accept.

As former British Prime Minister Gordon Brown put it Aug. 7: "Now no number of weekend phone calls can solve what is a financial, macroeconomic, and fiscal crisis rolled into one." Solving the crisis involves "a radical restructuring of both Europe's banks and the euro, and will almost certainly require intervention by the G-20 and the International Monetary Fund."

Sean Gallup/Getty Images

 

Edward Hugh is an independent macroeconomist based in Barcelona, Spain, and author of the blog Don't Shoot the Messenger.

DOUGIEL

12:54 AM ET

August 10, 2011

Just don't join the Euro

It was interesting reading this article seeing the recent problems in Greece and the Euro crashing to a halt . Also when Greece's economy first hit the ceiling, seeing all the Twitter and social media marketing updates, it was massive news.

Wouldn't just be easier instead of separating the Euro currency, why don't European countries just go back to looking after their own currency. That's why I believe Switzerland didn't join because they're doing well themselves.

Not only that, I'm hoping this doesn't affect our Aussie dollar too much. The Australian dollar has gone from a high of $1.10 USD back down to $0.99c USD all because of the US raising the debt ceiling, which in turn has caused the inflation in China to sky rocket and thus affecting us because we do a lot of exports to China.

But I suppose it's easier said than done.

 

CLADOE

4:03 AM ET

August 10, 2011

1, Going back to the various

1, Going back to the various national currencies would cause tremendous costs, internally as well as for the entire global economy. It could be an option for the troubled countries but to give up the Euro entirely is impossible.

2, CH didn't adopt the Euro because they are not even a member of the European Union, so why should they join the Euro? Of course they're doing better alone, once they'd join the Union they'd have to comply with EU finance laws and gone would be the money from all Qadaffis, Mugabes, Assads and other families...

 

GUSHUNGO

12:56 PM ET

August 28, 2011

It isn't the primary issue for Aussie dollar

The Aussie dollar should not be greatly affected by the European turmoil. The two main drivers for the AUD value are the Chinese economy (since China is now such an important export market for Australia) and the general price of the commodities that Australia produces.

The activities in Brussels or Berlin or Paris are nowhere near as important. Similarly, activities in New York or California or the volume of exports from Michiigan are also less important, even though there is a (time-lagged) correlation between automotive vehicle production and commodity prices (oil in particular of course).

 

NEILPRASAD

1:26 AM ET

August 10, 2011

Great Article

I just proposed this "split the euro while keeping the euro" theory in a speech about a week back.One question, what would Germany and other Euro 1 countries gain from such a situation?

 

FSW37

3:02 AM ET

August 10, 2011

 

NORTEL

7:09 AM ET

August 10, 2011

excellent solution, as long

excellent solution, as long as Germany could convince the Netherlands, Finland, and Estonia to Joine the dark side

 

F1FAN

10:44 AM ET

August 10, 2011

The main problem

Is that the Euro was a 'solution' where there was previously no problem. The promises of financial security aside the Euro was sold as way to solve Europe's 'handicap' in trade with the multitude of currencies in the European nations. The thing that most Eurozone supporters ignored is that most European nations were better off with their own currencies and the Euro only benefited the nations that created it, wrote the rules and could subsequently ignore the rules. European commerce worked just fine with the franc, deutschmark, drachma and lira and the only 'problem' the Euro solved is that travelers (like me) only had to stop once to change currency while in the 'Zone. Other than that there is already a two tier Euro system, in France and Germany your Euro will buy quite a bit, in Greece, Italy and Eastern Europe prices are much, much higher.

The Euro as a policy never made much sense and we are seeing now that instead of making things less complicated, it's actually more complicated . The Euro won't work until all of the Eurozone nations follow the same rules, and that won't happen.

 

PETERJOHNSTON

12:44 PM ET

August 10, 2011

The Euro

It's worth bearing in mind that Ireland and Greece were both bailed out by the EU. Poor old Spain is suffering to the same degree that the aforementioned were although no monetary assistance will be forthcoming for them. If only countries were not run by government bookmakers carrying out some sort of arbitrage betting style of economics. Is Brussels doing a great job of controlling the Euro? I don't think so and untill the other countries are signed up I doubt if it ever will. Enjoyable article all the same.

 

STEFAN STACKHOUSE

3:33 PM ET

August 10, 2011

Why not just let PIIGS default?

I really don't understand why they don't just let the PIIGS default, if they must. We have had a single currency in the US for most of our history (with the exception of the Civil War), and there have been a few cases when individual states had to default on their debts. It was not the end of the world, the end of the USA, the end of the dollar, or even the end of the particular states that defaulted. Life went on, adjustments to reality were made, and that was that.

My guess is that it has less to do with the euro or with the countries in question than with a few very powerful mega-banks which are - *SIGH* - once again considered "too big to fail". The elites must take care of their own. As for the rest of us, unfortunately we all know too well how that goes.

 

SCOOP

2:38 PM ET

August 12, 2011

Sounds like a failure to 'learn' from history...

The future of Europe: A stronger union or a smaller one? by STEPHAN FARIS | Time.com – 12 Aug 11

"Before the introduction of the euro, the European Community had introduced a currency mechanism intended to reduce the variability in exchange rates between the various member countries. In 1992, however, that system began to fail. In a sequence of events that would seem familiar to anyone watching the markets this week, speculation sent the market into a frenzy. The U.K., which had joined the mechanism two years earlier, hastily withdrew. The other countries drew the opposite lesson and pledged to move toward closer economic integration."

 

MATHALIE

5:41 AM ET

September 4, 2011

Poor old Spain is suffering

Poor old Spain is suffering to the same degree that the aforementioned were although no monetary assistance will be forthcoming for them. If only countries were not run by government bookmakers carrying out some sort of arbitrage betting style of sázkové tipy economics. Is Brussels doing a great job of controlling the Euro? I don't think so and untill the other countries are signed up I doubt if it ever will. Enjoyable article all the same.It was not the end of the world, the end of the USA, the end of the dollar, or even the end of the particular states that defaulted. Life went on, adjustments to reality were made, and that was that.

 

EGISTUBAGUS

7:58 AM ET

September 7, 2011

Americans seem to be having difficulty doing the right thing

Americans seem to be having difficulty doing the right thing this time around, or at least doing it at the right moment, as the market turbulence following Standard &Poor's downgrade of U.S. overeign debt served to underline. seem it is the fail of capitalism gedehumidifier, lgdehumidifier, santafedehumidifier soleusdehumidifier, / soleusdehumidifier, /rubbermaidtrashcans, simplehumantrashcan, simplehumantrashcan/ boschcoffeemaker, topratedcoffeemakers,

 

KARENYKARL

8:48 AM ET

September 9, 2011

Somehow this author's wisdom

seems to be right up there with Mr. Smoot and Mr. Hawley in 1930.

 

STASIN

4:14 PM ET

September 14, 2011

the future of the Euro

yes the Euro is in the worst place that it has ever been, but I see it as a good investment, ha I know it seems funny, but bear with me, Yes I see the Euro collapsing , because it will just take one of the piigs or another Eu member to pull out to the euro zone currency and this will cause the fall of the Euro, especially as I predict another country will follow suit, and the Euro will hit rock bottom and probably lose up to 65% of its value, but as Germany has invested too much in to this currency and knowing the Germans for there strenght they will rebuild the Euro back to a very strong currency again, so how is it a strong investment, well if have euros, now would be a great time to get rid of youre euros and given the gold price today, invest in gold or buy swiss francs and when the euro is at its lowest mark ie 65% sell youre francs or gold and buy the euro, I trust in the Germans, sure arent they holding Europe together at the moment.

 

VERONIQUE

12:53 PM ET

September 20, 2011

the future of the Euro

Interesting point of view and that would be great if the Germans could save the Euro, but Im afraid its to late for that, & swiss francs are not a good investment as they are way over valued because a lot of investors are buying up swiss francs , this has now forced the swiss government to devalue the swiss franc. I think the fact that the gold price is soaring, is a sure sign that the the Euro and the Dollar are headed for collapse,
so Im afraid the future of the Euro will not be saved by the Germans, and now Merkel is losing the confidence of her people.

 

VERONIQUE

12:54 PM ET

September 20, 2011

the future of the Euro

Interesting point of view and that would be great if the Germans could save the Euro, but Im afraid its to late for that, & swiss francs are not a good investment as they are way over valued because a lot of investors are buying up swiss francs , this has now forced the swiss government to devalue the swiss franc. I think the fact that the gold price is soaring, is a sure sign that the the Euro and the Dollar are headed for collapse,
so Im afraid the future of the Euro will not be saved by the Germans, and now Merkel is losing the confidence of her people.