The Myth of Anwar al-Awlaki

One of America's most-wanted Islamist radicals was once a humble, mainstream preacher who became enraged by the war on terror. At least, that's the story some people are selling.

BY J.M. BERGER | AUGUST 10, 2011

On Tuesday, Aug. 9, Naser Abdo, an American soldier, was indicted for plotting a terrorist attack against soldiers stationed at Fort Hood -- just the latest in a series of U.S. citizens who have been inspired to violence by the work of Anwar al-Awlaki, the American imam who went rogue and today threatens the United States from his father's country of Yemen.

Awlaki is clearly a dangerous man. As a country, the United States spends a lot of time talking about, worrying about, and trying to kill him. Unfortunately, attention runs fast, but not deep.

On July 27, Salon's Glenn Greenwald argued that Awlaki represented "the face of moderate Islam" and "the opposite of [Osama] bin Laden" before Sept. 11, 2001. By Greenwald's account, Awlaki was subsequently radicalized by America's wars and foreign policies. This conclusion was based on exactly two sources -- an interview conducted with Awlaki in 2001 and another interview dated 2009.

On the same day, Navy SEAL Adm. Eric T. Olson, speaking at the Aspen Security Forum, discussed the threat posed by Awlaki. "He's a dual-passport holder who has lived in the United States," Olson said, "so he understands us much better than we understand him."

In reality, Awlaki has given us a shocking abundance of material with which we can judge and understand him. He has recorded more than 100 hours of audio lectures, more than bin Laden, almost all of them in colloquial English. He has also figured in a long trail of investigations, including FBI and 9/11 Commission documents that are available to the public. Taken together, these sources reveal a portrait of a conflicted man whose path to radicalization started in the 1990s and steadily progressed to his present-day status as a terrorist icon.

Awlaki is not difficult to know, as Olson suggests, and he is not a two-dimensional talking point, as Greenwald would have us believe. He is a man, complicated and at times confounding, but accessible through his words and actions.

Awlaki was born in the United States, but spent his formative teen years in Yemen, during the height of the jihad against the Soviets. He reportedly grew up watching videos of the mujahideen as entertainment, in much the same way his American contemporaries watched Knight Rider.

He returned to the United States to study engineering at Colorado State University. According to his roommate, Awlaki spent one summer at a jihadi training camp in Afghanistan during the early 1990s, though that claim has not been independently corroborated. When he returned from Afghanistan, he was more interested in religion than engineering, and he began a career as an imam, or Muslim preacher.

Preaching in Colorado during the mid-1990s, Awlaki's stirring sermons on jihad reportedly moved a Saudi student to drop out of college and join jihadists in Bosnia and later Chechnya, eventually meeting death in battle.

When Awlaki moved to a bigger congregation in San Diego in the late 1990s, he inspired ever greater devotion in public, while failing his Islamic principles in private with arrests for soliciting prostitutes and hanging around a schoolyard, according to 9/11 Commission records. He also met with an al Qaeda facilitator named Ziyad Khaleel. The nature of their relationship remains unknown, but the FBI subsequently opened an investigation into Awlaki.

That investigation was closed for lack of evidence -- precious months too soon. In early 2000, two men arrived at Awlaki's San Diego mosque -- Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar, two of the 9/11 hijackers.

 

J.M. Berger is editor of Intelwire.com and author of Jihad Joe: Americans Who Go to War in the Name of Islam, which includes two chapters on Anwar al-Awlaki.

HURRICANEWARNING

7:55 PM ET

August 10, 2011

sounds like a great next

sounds like a great next candidate for a swift burial at sea...

 

XIRA666

10:04 PM ET

August 10, 2011

America, prepare for your com-upance.

America, prepare for your comupance.

After years and years of brutal oppression the world is waking up to your imperialist tactics and starting to organize at just the time that your economy is collapsing and you can no longer afford to defend yourself.

More bombings, more assassinations, more rebellion, more dead Americans.

You deserve it.

 

MICHAELGERALDPDEALINO

10:24 PM ET

August 10, 2011

Really?

I am not an American, but statements like yours can only come from an evil mind. Islamic fascism will never win. Good will triumph over evil.

 

MICHAELGERALDPDEALINO

10:58 PM ET

August 10, 2011

Skeptical

Thanks for the interaction, but I doubt if the fascists and other monsters would stop their atrocities if the US indeed withdraw from those countries. You give them a hand, and they'll ask for your arm-or your head.

 

MCJOHNSTONE

10:04 AM ET

August 11, 2011

Jihad Joe

J M Berger's poorly researched, poorly supported, and poorly argued article adds little to public understanding of the problem of Jihaadist movements in America or anywhere else. Coming from a self-styled expert on the topic, and in a well respected political journal, this is deeply disappointing.

The evidence against Awkali may be strong but that marshaled by Berger is circumstantial at best, often ridiculous. No attempt is made to chart Walaki's journey into Jihaadi politics, to examine his social origins, or even to substantiate Walaki's claim to a religious title. Based on Berger's descriptions, Walaki's understanding of the topics related in this article are pedestrian at best. It is standard Jihaadi dross and Berger, an expert on the topic, should know this.

By the same token Berger does little to establish himself as a serious analyst or scholar either. By focusing on Walaki's pseudo-religious arguments, Berger only succeeds at doing is further blurring the line between common Muslims and jihaadists, abetting the problem he claims he is confronting.

Not every expert is a journalist and not every journalist is an expert, but there are those how know and those who do not and Berger does not.

Berger's subtext is pure xenophobic hysteria. It does not belong in a journal like FP.

FP readers deserve better.

 

GSW1943

10:48 AM ET

August 11, 2011

Maybe I missed your point and Greenwald's but...

I understand the issue to be that al-Awalki is an American citizen and only under sharply circumscribed conditions in our law, none of which appear to be true of his case in so far as we know, can he be killed without a trial, conviction and death sentence in an American court. The president lacks the power to simply order American government forces or contractors to kill him.

I have no doubt that al-Awalki's views and intentions are despicable to almost all Americans, myself included, but, until these recent days, I have understood that he had a perfectly good right to hold these views and promote them so long as his activities fell short of incitement to imminent violence to carry them out.

Just as an aside, it is passing strange to me that the president cannot find the authority to raise the debt limit in some ambiguous words in the 14th Amendment but can find the authority in the Constitution to execute, without due process, an American citizen.

If there was a lot more to Greenwald's argument than this, I seem to have forgotten it or thought it less important than this key fact.

 

BILL STEWART

2:00 PM ET

August 11, 2011

Obama orders assassination of al-Awlaki instead of arrest

al-Awlaki sounds like a bad guy. The US probably has enough evidence to arrest him, give him a fair trial, and lock him up, and I'm just fine with that.

But writing an article about him that doesn't say near the front that Obama has ordered the CIA to assassinate him is dishonest. It's radically unconstitutional, and even George W. Bush didn't admit to doing such a thing. al-Awlaki is an American citizen, and it would be illegal under international law for Obama to have him assassinated even if he weren't.

While Obama's domestic policies may be much different than Bush's, apparently his foreign policies aren't improved any.

 

GSW1943

5:28 PM ET

August 13, 2011

Don't miss this deflation of Berger's points...

http://www.antiwar.com/blog/2011/08/12/on-another-awlaki-diatribe-and-the-insatiable-need-to-inflate-the-threat/

 

MATHALIE

5:52 AM ET

September 4, 2011

A person living in a Western

A person living in a Western country will always be at odds in perspective with a person living in an Islamic country, granted few exceptions. Anwar al-Awlaki, just like Osama bin laden can be a hero or terrorist as per your thinking.
What was the cause of the war, Islamic fundamentalism or US foreign policy, only the winner will decide. We can debate on this topic, it is more of a red herring. It is a sázkové tipy just war on terrorism or unjust war on Islam is a debate that has no face value. Is this war inevitable? Well that is the only question of significance.This was a war that was bound to happen. The clash between civilizations are a reality and we can ignore it at our own loss. The fundamentalist Islamists credit themselves as do the Westerners for death of Communism, a mutual enemy of convenience. Once there was no mutual enemy, the two partners in crime were bound to turn up against each other.

 

ANTIE

4:05 AM ET

September 7, 2011

Fly zap the Fundamentalists today!

U.S. has become a fly zapper in a limited sense; it does attract the flies of Islamic fundamentalists to it, but instead of killing them it is nurturing them by harnessing their missile power back in their home country. Fundamentalists like Anwar-al-Awlaki are finding their way into the country and are apparently carrying on their nefarious activities right under the nose of U.S. administration. This should be a wake –up call to the country’s administration who insists and focuses all their attention only on banning outsourcing to the third world countries rather than eliminating the weeds in their own backyard.

 

EGISTUBAGUS

8:40 AM ET

September 7, 2011

How become Awlaki is clearly a dangerous man

Awlaki is clearly a dangerous man. As a country, the United States spends a lot of time talking about, worrying about, and trying to kill him. Unfortunately, attention runs fast, but not deep. my question is how dangerous is he? (bacterialvagisymptoms hemroidstreatment, coffeetableplans, prematureejaculationexercises, tinnitusremedies, windturbinesforthehome, woodworkingideas, coffeemakersratings/ fibroidsinuterussymptoms,)

 

STACYB12

4:08 PM ET

September 9, 2011

The Myth of Anwar al-Awlaki

One of America's most-wanted Islamist radicals was once a humble, mainstream preacher who became enraged by the war on terror. At least, that's the story some people are selling. Do you imagine that the Middle East has been at peace for centuries,until those damn Americans came and stirred things up? Do you think our departure would do much of anything other than marginalize us as a global player? Lets play the scenario out. We withdraw form the region. No troops, no real policy, certainly no alliances with any one country. Iraq reverts to a battleground between Shi'a and mutual fund My dogs are the best. They know enough to object anyone coming within 100 ft. of my property. Darn tootin'. So do all the other dogs in my neighborhood. When America and its allies can see fit to stop bringing freedom and democracy via Lord Balfour, Chaim Weizmann, Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower, Kissinger, W, Obama, drones and dopey Americans, to the Middle East we can begin to have an intellige.