Cloudy with a Chance of Insurgency

Does extreme weather cause war? Don't count on it.

BY CHARLES KENNY | AUGUST 29, 2011

As the East Coast of the United States was pounded by a hurricane over the weekend, mere days after an earthquake had cracked monuments and upset lawn furniture from Virginia Beach to Baltimore, Mother Nature was once again front-page news across the country. So it was fortuitous that last week's issue of the scientific journal Nature included a much-talked-about article linking the wrath of nature to the wrath of man. "Climate Shifts Cause War" and "First Proof that Climate Is a Trigger for Conflict," the headlines suggested.

In the paper, Princeton University researcher Solomon Hsiang and colleagues argue -- as paraphrased by a Nature news article -- that "tropical countries face double the risk of armed conflict and civil war breaking out during warm, dry El Niño years than during the cooler La Niña phase." El Niño and La Niña (collectively known as ENSO, for the El Niño Southern Oscillation) are the warm and cool parts of the variation in temperatures that occurs every few years in the Pacific Ocean. In different parts of the tropics, El Niño can cause conditions ranging from floods to droughts -- in turn potentially linked to lower agricultural output and other risks. Hsiang and his co-authors looked at data on the timing of ENSO and civil conflict in the tropics and concluded that as many as one in five civil wars worldwide over the last 60 years may be related to El Niño.

Given that climate change is likely to be associated with warmer, drier tropical regions, the study's findings led numerous commentators to warn that the world's future could be increasingly violent. Thankfully, the study -- for all its careful design and academic interest -- provides little evidence that human-induced climate change will have any such effect. The nature of the relationship between the weather and violence in the past remains open to question, and the study itself suggests reasons why we'd expect any impact to decline in the future.

The paper is the latest in a line that has linked climate with violence. The Malleus Maleficarum, a 15th century Catholic treatise on witchcraft, has a whole chapter on how witches "Raise and Stir up Hailstorms and Tempests, and Cause Lightning to Blast both Men and Beasts," as economist Emily Oster notes in her study of the link between bad weather and witch burnings. During the Little Ice Age in the mid-centuries of the last millennium, witch burnings increased as the climate got cooler; as many as 1 million people were killed. In 2007, University of Hong Kong geographer David Zhang and colleagues from around the world looked at data covering global temperatures and warfare dating from 1400 to 1900 and estimated that the number of wars worldwide per year was almost twice as high in cold centuries as it was in warm centuries. This was, they suggested, because cold weather caused declining food yields and rising food prices, which brought with them famine and political instability.

Further south, the usual concern is with heat and drought rather than cold and overcast weather, so the plausible relationship between climate and warfare is different. In 2009, University of California, Berkeley, economist Marshall Burke and colleagues looked at temperature and conflict data from Africa and found a positive association between warmth and war. They went as far as to argue, "When combined with climate model projections of future temperature trends, this historical response to temperature suggests a roughly 54% increase in armed conflict incidence by 2030, or an additional 393,000 battle deaths if future wars are as deadly as recent wars."

But is the relationship between climate and violence really that clear? First off, even when rainfall and temperature patterns were directly included in Hsiang and colleague's statistical analysis, the association between El Niño years and civil violence remained. In other words, whatever the impact of El Niño on violence, it apparently isn't connected to its effect on precipitation levels or high temperatures in tropical countries. Perhaps, the paper suggests, El Niño's impact on violence is due to the timing of the rainfall, or altered wind patterns, or humidity, or cloud cover -- but those theories are (so far) untested.

Mario Tama/Getty Images

 

Charles Kenny is a senior fellow at the Center for Global Development, a Schwartz fellow at the New America Foundation, and author, most recently, of Getting Better: Why Global Development Is Succeeding and How We Can Improve the World Even More. "The Optimist," his column for ForeignPolicy.com, runs weekly.

IAN

8:05 AM ET

August 30, 2011

I see envonmental factors

as an added issue that ends up bringing the pot to a boil. A desperately poor place like Somalia might scrape by if agriculture and subsistance farming continue to survive. With the famine and the drought, however, as people get more and more desparate, they become more likely to look around and take what they need as they can.

In the end, while claiming weather directly relates to increased violence is not entirely true, it certainly has its merits. Maybe they just tried too hard to find conclusions that supported what they believed, rather than providing a paper on possibilities over "certainties". I personally believe that if climate change is effected and the world temperature is reigned in, all other things remaining the same (like no sudden peak oil production drop-off or what have you), you would see a decline in war deaths overall.

Like you said, though, it hasn't been proven. That's because it hasn't happened yet. Before we worry about this, lets get the governments and companies behind climate change first. Without that, this becomes a purely academic argument as the world gets too hot to effectively support mankind.

 

SIEGOO

8:59 AM ET

September 3, 2011

ilk baslarda zevkli dakilar

ilk baslarda zevkli dakilar geçirip daha sonra degisik turde videolar ve sendesik yin mutlu olun

 

SEO IN KENT

8:35 AM ET

August 30, 2011

Gone quiet lately

Over the last couple of years since the global recession it does seem that climate change is mentioned less and less, surely this should be at the fore-front of everything we do. Green living seems to have pushed under the rug so to speak. seo in kent

 

BENPANGAGXX

9:27 PM ET

September 22, 2011

totally right

you are absolutely right there my friend. We are also having this kind of problem in our country and i really don't see this problem going away anytime soon. We all hope it would but that would be wishful thinking. the sims social bot Although some of what you said there i don't totally agree since this is different from our country. But all in all, you have a great point there. Thank you for sharing your thoughts. the sims social cheats

 

YAFFEN

8:53 AM ET

August 30, 2011

Methodology

It also appears that he didn't study his statz.

http://www.edwardrcarr.com/opentheechochamber/2011/08/25/conflict-and-el-nino-how-did-this-get-through-peer-review/

 

DHSTRONGHEART

10:23 AM ET

August 30, 2011

The weakness of a global focus

I haven't read the Nature article that inspired Kenny to write this piece, but the approach taken by the researchers reveals the weakness of singling-out one driver in a global context and claiming that the observed dynamics can be solely attributed to that one driver. (A manifestation, I believe, of what A.N. Whitehead called this the "fallacy of misplaced concreteness"). What would be more useful is to take individual IMPACTS of climate change--increased evaporation, increased severity of storms, increased frequency of wildfires, etc.--and, on a more local scale, try to identify the increase in such impacts with socio-economic changes in a society, which would likely reveal a very convincing "breadcrumb trail" from climate change to increased social tension/violence.
D.H. Strongheart
Santa Fe, NM

 

UBOAT53

10:37 AM ET

August 30, 2011

Interesting Omission

The author claims to refute entirely the claim that climate change (of any sort) can cause war, but even the numbers he cites show an increase in warfare and conflict with changes in climate. Perhaps he should be a bit more subdued in his claims; climate change may not be the most significant factor driving conflict in the world, but it does seem to have a significant and measurable impact.

 

INDAYMANDRAXX

3:42 AM ET

September 26, 2011

very funny

the title is really very funny don't you think? Although the content isn't.Thank you for sharing your thoughts though. pacquiao vs marquez 3 tickets I find it to be very entertaining and informative. pacquiao vs marquez tickets You have a talent for writing. You should keep it up. watch pacquiao vs marquez online I just don't know about the other comments above. I don't think I understand what they're referring to at all. pacquiao vs marquez 3 fight live stream

 

HURRICANEWARNING

1:50 PM ET

August 30, 2011

I think it's pretty obvious

I think it's pretty obvious to anyone who pays attention to anything that environmental factors have a HUGE amount to do with conflict. While they are usually not the sole reason, they are often a catalyst or a precursor. When you think about this however, try to eliminate "war" from you mind and think instead in terms of "security issues" or "conflict". Think more along the lines of how a changing climate can create refugees, destroy food yields, and drive populations into resource competition. Overharvesting of resources can also lead to conflict, such as in the case of the Somali pirates; who initially started out as a coast guard to stop pirate fishing (and toxic waste dumping). This will all start off on a small scale and there will be many articles like this asking whether or not changing climate and human environmental degradation can cause conflict. The answer will soon be clear enough, maybe in 50 years, maybe in 100 years. The mere idea that environment, and human use/ misuse of the environment is NOT a catalyst for conflict is absurd. Of course it is.

 

LYNDSAY

6:39 AM ET

August 31, 2011

The climate is only one head of the Hydra

Stating that a changing climate is only one of the 'ingredients of conflict' is a fair point.

However, this doesn't alter the fact that climate variations (and it's subsequent effect on agricultural yields/water flows/precipitation) + declining phosphate deposits + declining hydrocarbon deposits + the fact the prices of many of these commodities aren't set by the fundamentals of supply & demand = A perfect storm for our children.

 

TAYFA34

5:25 AM ET

September 26, 2011

I don't like Terror

And Palestinian land will shrink, suicide bombers will respond, rockets will be launched and Israelis killed. Now Hezbollah and Sunnis have started up again in Lebanon. And Iran is powering up its nuclear capacity. Israel may feel impelled to react at some point if it calculates either Lebanon or Iran needs to be nipped in the bud. Add Syria to the toxic mix in Lebanon; and if things boil over there then Palestine will be left to sit and stew on the perennial international back burner. Hope, at this point, is not even a diamond in the rough. porno porno porno porno web tasarım