Lightning Rod

As Dick Cheney's punch-throwing memoir hits store shelves, Foreign Policy hosts a freewheeling debate on the legacy of America's most controversial vice president.

AUGUST 31, 2011

A man of principle
By Elliott Abrams

The early reviews of Dick Cheney's memoir have not evaluated the book, but instead have used its publication as an occasion for attacks on Cheney and his record, with general assaults on George W. Bush's administration thrown in for good measure. (Perhaps the best, i.e. worst, example of this is Robert Kaiser's strident "review" in the Washington Post.)

Cheney's memoir is not about 9/11, or solely about Bush's administration, but about his entire life and political career. I first knew Cheney when he was chairman of the Republican Policy Committee in the House of Representatives (from 1981 to 1987), and our discussions centered then on the wars in Central America. Neither controversy nor scandal shook his view that preventing communist takeovers in that region was an important goal for the United States. Later, when I served at Bush's National Security Council, I sometimes worked with Cheney, then vice president. Despite those who claim he changed over time, I did not find that so. The central qualities remained: total devotion to principle and to country, and complete and unswerving commitment to any policy he believed served American interests.

If that sounds predictable or normal in a vice president, think again. Many vice presidents are concerned above all about their own reputations and political futures. Some separate themselves from the president to curry favor with the press, their party, or even the opposing party. Many use leaks to protect their personal interests. Cheney did none of these things. When he differed from a policy he told the president so, privately, and told the press and those outside the White House nothing -- a practice that earned him unending attacks in the media from gossip-hungry journalists.

Cheney fervently believed that America was at war after 9/11, and this belief led him to the conclusion that America must fight and win. Such a conviction would have been commonplace after Pearl Harbor but was less so in the years after 2002 -- and especially as the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq became unpopular. Many politicians would have flinched, adjusted, tacked; in fact, many did. Cheney refused, and for this he suffered caricature as a warmonger, torturer, and fanatic. Or perhaps suffer is the wrong verb, for though the attacks came they usually made him grin, not grimace. He did not much care, for he thought far more was at stake than his approval ratings.

News stories about the memoir have noted above all his criticism of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice over North Korea policy, and of Secretary of State Colin Powell over leaking to defend his own policy choices and his personal popularity. As to North Korea, Cheney and Rice had a deep disagreement, but the criticism is not personal; readers must judge who had the better of the policy argument then and who has it now. To me, Cheney appears to win hands down, but we must await the Rice memoir due in November to see what arguments she can muster. As to Powell, the criticism is more personal, for Cheney accuses him of criticizing the president and his policies to people outside the administration and of constant leaking.

Powell himself has admitted that he could not continue after 2004 because his views could not be reconciled with those of Bush. He has not admitted to the leaking, but the leaks by Powell and his deputy, Richard Armitage, were too widely known in Washington to require any additional proof. And as to Cheney's indictment of Powell and Armitage for standing by while Scooter Libby, Cheney's chief of staff, was unjustly prosecuted for the leak of Valerie Plame's name, the facts are in; the complaint is justified.

Here again, Cheney's comments now and his conduct while in office are a reminder that there are values and principles that must be still honored when popularity and even reputation are at risk. He believed this, put country first, and acted accordingly.

Elliott Abrams, a senior fellow for Middle Eastern studies at the Council on Foreign Relations, was deputy national security advisor handling Middle Eastern affairs in U.S. President George W. Bush's administration.

Getty Images

 

ZATHRAS

9:50 AM ET

September 1, 2011

I wonder if Tom Ricks isn't

I wonder if Tom Ricks isn't just reaching here to find something nice to say, only because he glides over the obvious difference between Cheney circa 1990 and Cheney circa 2001.

This is simply that the first man worked for the elder Bush, and the second for the younger Bush. Cheney as Defense Secretary had boundaries he would have been fired for crossing; as Vice President, he could not be fired, and his ignorant, intellectually lazy chief was so dependent upon him that he wouldn't have been even if it had been legally possible.

Many people have noted the contrast between the unique and somewhat bizarre role Cheney assumed in the second Bush administration and his performance as the elder Bush's Defense Secretary (and, earlier, as President Ford's chief of staff) and convinced themselves that Cheney had to have changed his personality in some way. That is not the most likely explanation. Men respond to temptation placed in their path in unpredictable ways. Cheney, serving a weak President willing to delegate large elements of his own authority to his Vice President, yielded to the temptation. He sought to implement his limited and somewhat outdated ideas about global American policy, promote his friends and allies within the administration, and wreck any chance of establishing an orderly decision-making process in the younger Bush's White House, simply because he could.

 

GUTHRIEMARINA17

4:29 AM ET

September 4, 2011

i cant believe this!! me and

i cant believe this!! me and my sister just got two i-pads for $42.77 each and a $50 amazon card for $9. the stores want to keep this a secret and they dont tell you. go here PennyOrder.comONLY

 

WHISKEYPAPA

9:50 AM ET

September 1, 2011

Devil

Cheney says in his new memoir that he advocated an attack on Iran in June, 2007 - JUST as Gen. Petreaus and Gen. Ordinero were trying to implement the so-called Surge. Was Cheney insane? Deluded? an agent for Iran? Maybe Halliburton? Whichever, the lives of our Marines and soldiers meant nothing to him - something he proved the whole time he held office.

Walt

 

SLABUDA

11:09 AM ET

September 1, 2011

Surprised by his approval rating

It's hard to believe the he was surprised his administration's approval rating was only 13% when he left office. Was he really that detached from the people?

Stephen

 

ERICJOHNSON

11:56 AM ET

September 1, 2011

I can believe it

@Stephen

I definitely can believe that his approval rating was so low. I cannot tell if you were being sarcastic or not, but for the sake of this response I'm going to think that you weren't. Honestly, there was so much wrong with the last presidential office (president and vice president) that I'm surprised they even got to 13% approval. I thought they would be in the single digits!

Eric (@ woodworking projects)

 

HURRICANEWARNING

2:19 PM ET

September 1, 2011

Dick Cheney is a no joke

Dick Cheney is a no joke criminal. He lied to the American People, he lied to congress, he lied to friends, authorities, and he lied to the president of the United States. His lies cost untold amounts of life and treasure to be lost. He is a deplorable human being who deserves nothing less than prison time. If one wants to see the walking/ talking definition of a sociopath, look no further than Dick Cheney. He feels ZERO remorse for the things he has done and actually believes he was in the right no matter what. I might even consider accusing him of being a highfunctioning Schizophrenic if I didn't know better. The man and his belief systems are so incredibly flawed and out of touch with reality that one has to wonder...Why was he EVER allowed within 100 miles of the White House? Neo-conservatives have got to be some of the stupidest, most out of touch "smart" people I have ever met...and Dick Cheney is their messiah. Enough Said.

 

THEJRAFFE

7:37 PM ET

September 1, 2011

"Many vice presidents are

"Many vice presidents are concerned above all about their own reputations and political futures. Some separate themselves from the president to curry favor with the press, their party, or even the opposing party. Many use leaks to protect their personal interests. Cheney did none of these things."

And with that last sentence Mr. Abrams proves he can not be taken seriously. Call it Michelle Bachman Fever. Call it a lapse in memory or poor research. But to write something so patently untrue is either an act of deception or gross ineptitude. It seems Foreign Policy must have mistaken him for a serious individual.

The former national security adviser and think-tank fellow should Google "Valerie Plame" and revise accordingly.

 

SJQP2100

1:27 AM ET

September 2, 2011

Cheney in charge

To most observers it was and is clear that Dick Cheney was the principal driving force of the Bush administration, especially in the first four years. The incident with AG Ashcroft in the hospital reeks of Cheney. He and Alberto Gonzales couldn't even wait for Ashcroft's release date before they tried to get him to sign those documents!

 

IRISHSILVER

8:21 AM ET

September 2, 2011

Power

It seems to me that he was clearly the real power in Washington, and it will be many years before the legacy of his actions are made right. Who on earth are the 13% who approved of him? The mind boggles! And can such power really be bought and sold like that? I guess it can....

 

SCREWED AND TATTOOED

8:24 AM ET

September 2, 2011

Wow

Most of you seem to be dillusional, ideological conspiracy theorists that have nothing good to say about the current administration so you go on and on and on and on.........about the last one. I'd argue that both did, and are doing the best job they can and have the best interests of the US in mind while doing so. The idea that anyone actually "lied" to go to war in Iraq is silly. It wasn't a lie, it was faulty intelligence. That is what we should be trying to fix and I think they have tried to do just that. Your vitriol is wasted imo. If you have good ideas to make anything better, let them be known. Otherwise, fostering ill will and ridiculous accusations are a waste of time.

 

HURRICANEWARNING

12:05 PM ET

September 2, 2011

I can appreciate your opinion

I can appreciate your opinion here. And normally i would agree with you. I think President Bush did the best job he knew how to do, and always had Americas best interests in mind. Dick Cheney, however, is a criminal. He outed a CIA agent (that is a fact, look it up anywhere on any source), he leaked false information/ stories to the New York Times to create his own reality (fact), he also attempted to abuse the Presidents power by getting him to Pardon scooter Libby as he left office (which Bush was against, knowing that Cheney was in-fact the real criminal and scooter was the fall guy). Not to mention that at every turn in the run up to war, when the CIA and other agencies attempted to give their intelligence briefings and assessments, they were always blocked, diverted, or over-ruled by the office of the vice president-which was responsible for some of the worst most costly decisions of the war. He over stepped his grounds, abused his power, and IMO ultimately is completely unfit to be a representative of the USA. I am no conspiracy theorist by the way, everything I have stated here is well researched fact.

 

HURRICANEWARNING

12:06 PM ET

September 2, 2011

read the book "Angler" if you

read the book "Angler" if you want to actually learn anything about Dick cheney.

 

SCREWED AND TATTOOED

11:25 AM ET

September 2, 2011

Where's the proof?

"The program was not safe. Many of those subjected to waterboarding and other forms of torture while detained by U.S. forces have been damaged for life. "
Yet another accusation not supported. Also, the legality was questioned before the decision was made and found to be legal. Only Monday morning quarterbacks are saying different because the politically correct society we live in threatens them. Like I said before.........

 

GUTHRIEMARINA17

4:30 AM ET

September 4, 2011

i cant believe this!! me and

i cant believe this!! me and my sister just got two i-pads for $42.77 each and a $50 amazon card for $9. the stores want to keep this a secret and they dont tell you. go here PennyOrder.com

 

HURRICANEWARNING

8:57 PM ET

September 5, 2011

ya know...All you

ya know...All you nutter,morons out there who want to talk about the "zionist war machine" destroy the credibility of the many rational arguments to be made against the former vice pres. and the Bush administration. A real conversation needs to be had about the legality of Cheneys actions, and what we want a future vice president to be capable of. Yet as long as you fools continue to spout verbal nonsense like "zionist this,and zionist that" (listen carefully here) YOU WILL NEVER BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY BY ANYONE INTELLIGENT...EVER. This is a cold hard fact, welcome to reality. Please tone down your craziness so people can have actual discussions about things that matter. thankyou. that is all.

 

EGISTUBAGUS

7:42 AM ET

September 7, 2011

reply to argument all you know

A real conversation needs to be had about the legality of Cheneys actions, and what we want a future vice president to be capable of. since i believe cheney give bad influence to bush administration and policy bacterialvagisymptoms, hemroidstreatment, coffeetableplans, prematureejaculationexercises, tinnitusremedies, windturbinesforthehome, woodworkingideas, coffeemakersratings, fibroidsinuterussymptoms,

 

TAYFA34

5:44 AM ET

September 26, 2011

I don't like Terror

And Palestinian land will shrink, suicide bombers will respond, rockets will be launched and Israelis killed. Now Hezbollah and Sunnis have started up again in Lebanon. And Iran is powering up its nuclear capacity. Israel may feel impelled to react at some point if it calculates either Lebanon or Iran needs to be nipped in the bud. Add Syria to the toxic mix in Lebanon; and if things boil over there then Palestine will be left to sit and stew on the perennial international back burner. Hope, at this point, is not even a diamond in the rough. porno porno porno porno web tasarım