Bridges to Somewhere

More austerity won't save the global economy. Building infrastructure just might.

BY JUSTIN YIFU LIN | SEPTEMBER 1, 2011

Today's mounting anxiety over weak growth prospects is more than just a bad hangover from the financial tumult of 2008. In the United States and several European countries, new jobs remain scarce. National incomes in some advanced countries still linger below pre-crisis levels. The medium-term outlook for the United States and Europe is dim. Not only will this make it more difficult for advanced economies to tackle fiscal and employment problems at home, but it will also reduce growth prospects for developing countries, many of which -- particularly in the Middle East and sub-Saharan Africa -- suffer from a lack of employment opportunities. The result? Millions trapped in poverty, creating fertile ground for social instability. While governments on both sides of the Atlantic are considering cutting budgets, what the world needs most right now is growth.

For More

Photos: The Road to Prosperity
How do you end a recession? Build something.

Without growth, it will be very painful and difficult for advanced economies to increase employment and significantly reduce their debt burden. But how to do it? The solution could take the form of a global infrastructure investment initiative, which would rest on two key pillars. First, advanced economies would need to spend billions of dollars on infrastructure projects, whether by upgrading old facilities or building new ones that release bottlenecks to growth. But even this might not be enough to generate sufficient growth and jobs. Thus, policymakers, entrepreneurs, and investors should also promote and facilitate infrastructure investments in developing countries where opportunities for such investments abound. This should not be seen as charity: Infrastructure investments in developing countries increase demand for capital goods, such as the turbines or excavators that are often produced in the United States and Europe.

Promoting infrastructure investments in developing countries, an idea that is also being advanced by the G-20, would boost exports, manufacturing employment, and growth in high-income countries, while reducing poverty and enhancing growth in the developing world. It's a win-win solution.

It is important, now more than ever, for advanced economies to continue investing in infrastructure to create jobs and support growth. Good private investment opportunities are hard to find amid the current turmoil. Factories continue to carry spare capacity, and homes and office buildings remain vacant. Infrastructure investments can fill the void, creating much-needed jobs in the construction sector, which has been particularly hard hit, and generating demand for industrial products. Upgrading existing infrastructure and building new transit nodes, if well chosen, can enhance future productivity, raising competitiveness and growth and boosting countries' ability to repay the investments in the future. U.S. 10-year Treasury bonds have been trading at historically low levels since the financial crisis hit. I could therefore not agree more with my colleague Joseph Stiglitz of Columbia University, who recently wrote, "[T]he real answer, at least for countries such as the US that can borrow at low rates, is simple: use the money to make high-return investments."

But what about the fear of unsustainable debt burdens, which have Western governments searching for budget cuts? Lack of growth is one of the biggest threats to debt sustainability right now, and cutting growth-enhancing expenditure is misguided. And many infrastructure projects can actually be self-financing: Take, for example, toll bridges or highways. What's more, it is often cheaper to keep roads and other infrastructure in good shape through regular maintenance than to repair them once they are badly damaged.

With public coffers empty or at best strained, innovative mechanisms are required to attract private-sector financing for infrastructure projects, including the use of public-private partnerships, or PPPs. Well-designed infrastructure investments can generate secure and attractive returns for private investors in the current low-growth, high-risk environment. Government officials on both sides of the Atlantic have drawn up interesting proposals to encourage PPPs for infrastructure investment. U.S. President Barack Obama's administration, for example, has backed the creation of the National Infrastructure Reinvestment Bank, which could issue infrastructure bonds, provide subsidies to qualified infrastructure projects, and provide loan guarantees to state and local governments. Europe is considering the implementation of a new Europe 2020 Project Bond Initiative, which would use public guarantees to leverage private-sector financing from nontraditional investors, such as pension funds.

QASSEM ZEIN/AFP/Getty Images

 

Justin Yifu Lin is senior vice president and chief economist of the World Bank.

SJQP2100

1:43 AM ET

September 2, 2011

Austerity

This whole issue of austerity is so phony it's understandable why so many who support oligarchy, especially in the U.S., are so vocal in promoting it. It's so unfortunate that so many people don't have the resources to see through the falsehoods and propaganda that have misled so many. This country desperately needs work done on its infrastructure, but the "Republican'ts" in Congress are a perpetual roadblock to anything meaningful being done. If there were a proposed release date for some money to be allocated to a particular project, the inevitable response of the Tea Party would be "No!"

 

LORIBROWN85@GMAIL.COM

9:48 AM ET

September 2, 2011

Wouldn't work in this political climate

Compelling argument, but good luck trying to get the US Congress to support investing in infrastructure projects outside of the country. It's hard enough to keep funding levels that we have now for international development with the cuts that are being pushed through. Regular Americans (i.e. voters) have no concept of how international development investments help growth in their country, and will therefore scream and cry about any money that is sent abroad. Pity.

 

APARICIO

10:17 AM ET

September 2, 2011

This is B-Sh.

Seriously, you gotta be kidding. Please. Do some real research. What you propose has been tried before, AND IT DOES NOT WORK. Governments has given trilliones of dollars already, and what has been the result? More crisis. You want to keep inflating the bubble with money that Governments do not have, chaining the future generations to a debt neither they or us agreed to. You want to give that power to politicians, giving all that money to bureaucrats. I mean, for god sake, be serious, the only thin that could bring us back in the way of prosperity is bringing economy back to reality, and that would hurt, but will hurt even more as long as we keep lying to ourselves.
Seriously, to all the readers of this piece, I beg youo to google a documentary called "Overdoze: the next financial crisis". It explains crystal clear all what I am saying.

 

NAMORADO_TX

1:32 PM ET

September 2, 2011

Think outside the box, change the system... Braun2012.US

. . . Harry Braun "thinks outside the box" of the traditional and corrupt political system, calling for comprehensive actions combining government accountability and transparency with direct citizen democracy and a proved energy and fuel technology that is cost-efficient and non-polluting. He says, get America off oil and into a Solar-Hydrogen Economy as an emergency priority.
. . . AlI I can ask you to do is go to his website, http://Braun2012.US ... scroll down to get an overview of the topics and graphics that demonstrate the urgency and sensibility of his comprehensive approach to government, then read from the top the details of how it could all work, based on technology that's been around for decades, but been suppressed by major energy corporations that fear loss of control to "off-the-grid" independent and self-sufficient communities that could produce their own fuel and food without need of dependency on Big Oil, Big Pharma, Big Agribiz, etc. It all makes sense, since President Eisenhower warned about the unrestrained growth of the military-industrial (and now-added private-incarceration) complex, the biggest portion of our productivity and national budget is now devoted to arms, munitions, and perpetual war. Removing the need for oil, coal, and radioactive nuclear energy resources means no excuse for resource-controlling wars, and all human-resource needs and social care could be funded within a balanced no-debts budget while returning to a sustainable environment.

 

PHILBEST

12:44 AM ET

September 3, 2011

Trust, politics, and culture

This essay happened to be mostly about infrastructure in developing countries, and "Private Public Partnerships". The writer's reasoning is good - getting better infrastructure into developing countries WOULD make them good contributors to the global economy.

The biggest obstacle to this happening, is simply that investors mostly are unable to trust the politics and the culture in developing countries. This is why millions of people lend and lend and lend to countries they trust, like the USA and Japan, even if the interest rates are pitifully low; and of course Zimbabwe cannot raise money for infrastructure at ANY interest rate.

 

BLUE13326

11:42 AM ET

September 5, 2011

Repackaged horseshit... This

Repackaged horseshit...
This has been tried and tried and never works...only fundamentalists would believe it at this point...

 

ERKKI

8:13 AM ET

September 27, 2011

The dogs...

There is no justice when the people that are responsible for this crisis are the ones benefittting from it. They must be held responsible.

 

TAYFA34

11:07 AM ET

September 27, 2011

No Comment :S

And Palestinian land will shrink, suicide bombers will respond, rockets will be launched and Israelis killed. Now Hezbollah and Sunnis have started up again in Lebanon. And Iran is powering up its nuclear capacity. Israel may feel impelled to react at some point if it calculates either Lebanon or Iran needs to be nipped in the bud. Add Syria to the toxic mix in Lebanon; and if things boil over there then Palestine will be left to sit and stew on the perennial international back burner. Hope, at this point, is not even a diamond in the rough. porno porno porno porno web tasarım