The Renminbi An Exorbitant Burden The New Triumvirate

The Buck Stays Here

Why the dollar isn't going anywhere anytime soon.

BY DANIEL W. DREZNER | SEPTEMBER 7, 2011

Five years ago, questioning the dollar's status as the world's reserve currency was confined to abstruse think-tank musings. How times have changed. The 2008 financial meltdown of the U.S. subprime mortgage market pushed debates about the dollar into the public eye. In September 2009, World Bank President Robert Zoellick warned, "The United States would be mistaken to take for granted the dollar's place as the world's predominant reserve currency. Looking forward, there will increasingly be other options to the dollar." This year's political meltdown in Washington has only exacerbated the issue. HSBC now predicts that China's currency will rival the dollar sometime this decade.  

The obstacles to a shift away from the dollar are still formidable. A useful global currency provides three necessary functions: It should serve as a medium of exchange for cross-border transactions, a unit of account to determine prices, and a store of value for those wishing to hold liquid assets. Measures like official currency reserves, invoiced international transactions, and international debt securities confirm that the dollar still surpasses any other currency in providing a unit of account and a medium of exchange. As a store of value, however, the dollar has become more suspect. Gyrations in the price of gold and the exchange rates of the Australian dollar and Swiss franc suggest at least a modest effort to diversify away from the greenback.

About a year ago, I argued in International Relations of the Asia-Pacific that "neither the opportunity nor the willingness to shift away from the dollar is particularly strong." That was before a global economic slowdown and a downgrade of U.S. debt by Standard & Poor's, however. So has the world changed enough to require me to retract that conclusion? Not really.

For the dollar's reserve currency status to fundamentally change, both public and private actors would need to prefer alternatives to holding and using dollars. Yet there remains no attractive alternative to the dollar as a reserve currency. In terms of currency reserves, the closest peer competitor to the dollar is the euro. The eurozone, however, has achieved the signal feat of making the United States look relatively stable by comparison. Furthermore, the European Central Bank (ECB) doesn't seem to want the euro to become the new reserve currency. It has placed high barriers on any country joining the eurozone and seems more intrigued by the idea of kicking out some of the periphery countries than expanding the euro's use overseas. In January 2009, ECB President Jean-Claude Trichet flatly stated, "I strongly disagree with those who say that the euro has been created to compete with the U.S. dollar. Let's be clear: The ECB is not campaigning for the international use of the euro."

The other long-standing alternatives have even greater problems. The yen, pound, Swiss franc, and Australian dollar are all based in markets too small to sustain the inflows that would come from reserve currency status. A return to the gold standard in this day and age would be completely infeasible. Economist Barry Eichengreen recently detailed in the National Interest the domestic deflationary costs if the United States alone went back onto gold. And a global gold standard would have the same problem -- the liquidity of the global economy would be held hostage to the vagaries of the gold supply.

There is, of course, the Chinese renminbi. China's currency remains inconvertible for now. For the past few years, however, authorities in Beijing have taken incremental but appreciable steps to promote the international use of the renminbi to settle accounts in international trade. With the intention of turning Shanghai into a global financial center by 2020, Chinese authorities are even tinkering with the idea of liberalizing the capital account as well. The only bet speculators are making on the renminbi these days is that it will appreciate in value. Surely it will be a worthy challenger to the dollar?

Despite these steps, turning the renminbi into a convertible reserve currency would require a fundamental and costly transformation of China's domestic political economy. For the renminbi to be a truly global currency, Beijing would have to allow the following to happen: full currency convertibility combined with a dramatic appreciation in the value of the renminbi, greater liberalization and transparency in the domestic financial sector, and a dramatic decline in the book value of its dollar holdings.

Getty Images

 

Daniel W. Drezner, professor of international politics at Tufts University's Fletcher School and a contributing editor to Foreign Policy, is author of Theories of International Politics and Zombies. He blogs at drezner.foreignpolicy.com.

 

XINGLONGNITE

1:05 PM ET

September 8, 2011

The other FP article by

The other FP article by Arthur Kroeber is a better thesis.
Renminbi internationalization has now crossed the Rubicon --- China is now reacting, instead of acting, to the forces that is bringing the matter to a reality today. To begin with, trade settlement by China in RMB has been rising at a 500% per year clip, with outbound flow far exceeding that of inbound. China has to open its capital account convertibility at an accelerated pace or its forex reserve would shoot through $5 trillion by end of 2013. China would much rather that money be used domestically toward powering its hyper GDP growth rate, rather than recycled elsewhere. Arthur Kroeber's paper correctly pointed out that the interest of China and US alike are well aligned in this regard.
Would it be possible for the US to forestall this eventuality, by coersion or otherwise, as alluded to in your writing? I'd submit the answer is affirmative, but at a cost. The issue is whether that cost would be lower than otherwise. Aquino's state visit was an excellent guide: after high decibel sabre rattling, then he walk away with $50 billion in deals. While it may be possible for the US to engineer and afford another brilliant coup (behind France and NATO) as Libya's regime change, China has the time and money and will to endure far more.
Even if the US could line up enough like events as Libya every year, or even every month, China's speed of economic growth would take care of it without much a fuss. During the same time span Bernanke doled out $600 billion in QE2 to monetize US debt (as a free pass to conquer the world, paid for by everyone else), China's forex reserve rose by roughly $1 trillion, all the while with a manageable 6.5% CPI.
As China's import set to surpass that of the US within the next two years, its vice premier was busy talking to willing countries, such as UK, to host Renminbi coming out parties (e.g. Cameron's government expressed interest to have London as a Renminbi trading hub, ahead of NY or Chicago, I suppose), I guess a good history to go back to to find useful lesson would be the Pound Sterling during the Suez Canal campaign during the Eden era.
Americans have far better things to do as the Brits did. Yes, US was a more powerful country then than the Great Britain, but China already did surpass the US in GDP ppp, overall capital stock, and even nominal central government budget (excluding welfare entitlements) back in 2010.

 

RAYFIN3

8:15 AM ET

September 9, 2011

convert

I'm not an economist, but common sense tells me that the US dollar is on the verge of collapse. You can't run the printing presses 24/7 and expect the dollar to retain its value. I'm in the process of converting my meager savings into something more solid, and suspect that I'm not alone. Regarding dollar devaluation, the worst is yet to come.

 

DREAM D

4:35 PM ET

September 9, 2011

I hope so

But things are looking quite bleak on the future of the dollar, hopefully Obama's recent 440 billion job creation policy doesn't further devalue our dollar by increasing nation debt.
vibrators

 

URGELT

4:41 PM ET

September 12, 2011

An Over-Strong Dollar

Americans who cling to a strong dollar as a symbol of national economic power are deluding themselves.

Our economy has been hollowed by loss of manufacturing jobs, loss of job security, stagnant wages and benefits. A strong dollar only makes it worse by advantaging imports and disadvantaging domestic job-creating industries.

The dollar is now propped up by foreign demand for it as the de facto international currency. But this is an unstable situation. The longer the dollar remains overvalued relative to other currencies, the worse the domestic impacts on lost jobs, lower wages, lost benefits, lost industrial might, and increased debt.

Those fundamental weaknesses must come home to roost in the form of a currency panic. The US does not produce the goods and services that would be needed to redeem the dollars in foreign hands; and the only tool in the US toolbox to avoid defaulting on endlessly mounting debt is to print still more dollars, the prospect of which will make foreign holders of dollars terribly nervous.

You can see the confidence leaking out of the system as bankers in China, Russia, Japan and elsewhere begin to wonder out loud if continued reliance on the dollar as the primary international currency might not be wise. But they are hesitant to use words like "looming disaster," because they fear triggering the very panic they desperately hope to avoid. A currency panic will wipe out enormous wealth worldwide.

No-one knows what to do, apparently.

Well, one thing to do is to engineer a soft landing. The dollar must be allowed to go lower on international exchanges; this will force foreign governments to diversify their holdings and staunch the American economy's internal bleeding. It will help our balance of trade and spur domestic jobs growth.

If we don't do this, a correction is headed our way anyway, and it will be a nasty jolt to the world economy far worse than Lehman.

 

MITTAL

8:43 PM ET

September 17, 2011

Don't Worry America, India will save you

I have few thousands of rupees, and will exchange one Indian ruppe for one yankee dollar

then I can buy a foreclosed home in America.

Americans are welcome to exchange all their dollars , one dollar to one ruppe, and buy any thing they want in Bombay, rice, sugar, curie powder, straw sandals, cotton loin cloths, cow dung cookies, etc, lots of lots good stuffs

 

CINGOZ439

5:56 AM ET

September 30, 2011

Crisis

Now looking to get rid of the curse of terrorism turkey bulunu?u in states all over the world thought otherwise, all states should fight against terrorism is a terrorism problem will continue. Terrorism be fought on one front
sikiş sikiş
sikiş
sikiş
web tasarım

 

YARINSIZ

3:24 PM ET

October 6, 2011

Would it be possible for the

Would it be possible for the US to forestall this eventuality, by coersion or otherwise, as alluded to in your writing? I'd submit the answer is affirmative, but at a cost. seslichat The issue is whether that cost would be lower than otherwise. Aquino's state visit was an excellent guide: after high decibel sabre rattling, then he walk away with $50 billion in deals. While it may be possible for the US to engineer and afford another brilliant coup (behind France and NATO) as Libya's regime change, China has the time and money and will to endure far more.