Waiting for Bushehr

The long wait for Iran's first nuclear power plant is finally over. It's now online, but is it ready?

BY ALI VAEZ | SEPTEMBER 11, 2011

The ancient city of Bushehr, a steamy port in southwestern Iran, is bustling with foreign workers preparing to launch Iran's first nuclear reactor. The Middle East's only commercial nuclear power plant will soon become operational. Back in Washington, officials worry about Iran's emergence as an atomic power and all the many ways it will upset the region's delicate balance. The year is 1978.

Thirty-three years later, history is repeating itself. Today, it is Ayatollah Ali Khamenei instead of the pro-Western Shah Mohammed Reza Pahlavi, and Russian, not German, engineers building the nuclear power plant. But some things are nearly the same: The United States still worries; and the Middle East's only commercial nuclear power plant, we are told once again, is finally, really, at last about to become operational.

The story of Bushehr is one of ambition and folly, of a country whose nuclear dreams survived revolution, war, and religious fervor -- and sometimes common sense itself. But it's not just Iran that is guilty of ambition and folly; so too are its enemies -- among them the United States, Israel, and its Sunni neighbors -- whose monumental opposition to a nuclear Iran has created a set of conditions that virtually requires Tehran now to make good on its goal of harnessing the atom, damn the consequences. And after more than 30 years of this tug of war, it's less a question of who will prevail than what's been lost and overlooked in the fight.

The Bushehr story, in fact, goes back decades, to a time long before President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and the ayatollahs, when the megalomaniacal shah, endowed by the oil boom, decided virtually overnight that the country needed nuclear power to prepare for life after fossil fuels. He famously used to say, "Oil is a noble material and should not be wasted," and he advocated a greater part for nuclear power in Iran's energy portfolio. For him, nuclear technology was not only the sine qua non of modernity -- it also symbolized Iran's newly attained power and prestige.

At the time, the United States, still reeling from India's first nuclear test, was suspicious of the shah's intentions. Washington refrained from entering Iran's lucrative nuclear bazaar, but Germany stepped in and Kraftwerk Union AG was contracted to build two 1,200-megawatt reactors in Bushehr, along the coast not far from the city of Shiraz, to which the plant would supply power. The turnkey contract was worth $4.3 billion.

Construction began in 1975; the completion date was set for 1981. But fate proved that estimate inaccurate by at least three decades. In 1978, when one reactor was 85 percent complete, the country began descending into revolutionary turmoil, which brought about the demise of both the monarchy and the nuclear program.

One of the first decisions of the revolutionary Jacobins who overthrew the shah was to halt the Bushehr project, deemed as a costly Western imposition on a self-sufficient, oil-rich nation. Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, the founder of the Islamic Republic, famously suggested that it would be better to use the unfinished reactor buildings as grain silos. But as the wave of revolutionary fervor receded in the early 1980s, the tide turned in favor of reviving the nuclear program. By then, however, Iran was engaged in a bloody war with its neighbor Iraq, and efforts to resuscitate the atomic phoenix came to nothing.

IIPA via Getty Images

 SUBJECTS: IRAQ, POLITICS, IRAN, MIDDLE EAST
 

Ali Vaez is a fellow for science and technology and director of the Iran project at the Federation of American Scientists.

TOUMARA

1:28 AM ET

September 12, 2011

nuclear energy

I think one can use the data obtained from reactor to make bombs agaisnt humanity. For this reason nuclear techology should not evolved. It's very risky under this insane leaders ready to war for stupid reasons...There is one word arabic called oyun this means something to hide the truth behind energy justification.

 

SPEAK YOUR MIND

4:45 AM ET

September 12, 2011

America is the only country to have used the bomb

Yet we trust America to behave rationally. Ironic!

 

KINSHANE

11:22 AM ET

September 12, 2011

I'm not sure what your

I'm not sure what your comment has to do with the excellent article to which it is appended, but thanks for coming.

 

GESWEB

10:45 AM ET

September 12, 2011

Nuclear Age

Iran now has nuclear power and I'm guessing it's only a matter of time before they take the small step up to the creation of nuclear weapons - after all, if the UK, US, France, China and Russia have them, why shouldn't the Iranians?

Although the awesome destructive power of nuclear power scares me to death we're now in a nuclear age and unfortunately can't 'unlearn' the technology.

Let's hope we use it for the benefit of the human race and not it's destruction.

Danny

 

PECASAUTONET

7:17 PM ET

September 12, 2011

I think you are right

power of nuclear power scares me to death we're now in a nuclear age and unfortunately can't 'unlearn' the technology.
Acompanhantes
Massagistas

 

KAMPER

8:05 AM ET

September 13, 2011

FTA: Despite having no

FTA:
Despite having no experience in operating nuclear reactors, Iran is insisting on taking over management of the reactor from Russia only one year after it goes online.....

This worries me. The Russian fuel, waste removal, and management agreement seemed to me to be a swtor way of ensuring that Buseshr wasn't used for untoward activities. The peaceful use of nuclear energy relies on cooperation and partnership between nations - not operating power reactors in a state of autarky.
That the Russians will not be involved after a year at the plant makes me uneasy, though I find it hard to believe that a LWR could be used for nefarious purposes. I don't see how it is feasible to do so.
Yet, neutrons are neutrons, and where there is a will there may be a way.

 

HURRICANEWARNING

2:53 PM ET

September 13, 2011

annnnnd just waiting for

annnnnd just waiting for Israel to fly in and bomb them...anytime now. tic toc. They have been practicing the bomber run into Iran for years , much as they did when the same thing happened with Iraq. They have also been killing Iranian scientists. So, if you think Israel will back down from this one, you are crazy. The scariest part about this is that Israel has gone silent about this whole thing. Historically, that is what they do right before they attack. Just wait for it...I only hope the war between Hezbollah (Iranian proxy) and Israel that will follow won't be too bloody.

 

THORSTENM

1:41 PM ET

September 14, 2011

Self destroy

Beside some military and strategic consideration, we must think at the Iranian people as well. To run a nuclear plant is danger anyway. But to do this under the condition of economic boycott is even more. The delay show this in a strong way.
Lamiz

 

TAYFA34

5:33 AM ET

October 6, 2011

self keeps

And Palestinian land will shrink, suicide bombers will respond, rockets will be launched and Israelis killed. Now Hezbollah and Sunnis have started up again in Lebanon. And Iran is powering up its nuclear capacity. Israel may feel impelled to react at some point if it calculates either Lebanon or Iran needs to be nipped in the bud. Add Syria to the toxic mix in Lebanon; and if things boil over there then Palestine will be left to sit and stew on the perennial international back burner. Hope, at this point, is not even a diamond in the rough. porno porno porno porno web tasarım evlilik teklifi

 

YARINSIZ

12:57 PM ET

October 6, 2011

This worries me. The Russian

This worries me. The Russian fuel, waste removal, and management agreement seemed to me to be a swtor way of ensuring that Buseshr wasn't used for untoward activities. seslichat The peaceful use of nuclear energy relies on cooperation and partnership between nations - not operating power reactors in a state of autarky.